Kho Jabing, young Malaysian migrant worker, has been executed by Singapore...but in the aftermath, Singapore's administration of justice is being questioned. How can it be a 'fair trial' when one of the judges sat in the Court of Appeal that re-sentenced him to death sat in an earlier Court of Appeal. The expectation of an independent judge untainted by 'bias' is a pre-requisite for a fair trial. A judge who has already previously heard an Appeal by Kho Jabing will certainly no longer be unbiased - and normally a Judge in this situation would have recused himself and not heard that new Appeal..
One may not have realised this before, but after it was raised - Singapore should have acknowledged the 'mistake' and done the right thing.. see earlier post: QUESTIONABLE VALIDITY OF THE COURT OF APPEAL THAT RE-SENTENCED KHO JABING TO DEATH REASON ENOUGH FOR IMMEDIATE STAY OF EXECUTION OF KHO JABING, NOW SCHEDULED FOR FRIDAY 20/5/2016
Anyway, the lawyers of Kho Jabing filed applications to Court - but the manner in which the Courts conducted themselves was disturbing. There seem to be more concern about hanging Kho Jabing on Friday(20/5/2016) - Wesak Day, over and above everything else..
The hearings were rushed through without even according enough time for the lawyers to prepare...Why? AND guess what, the same judge whose presence may have invalidated the sentence to death sat and heard the application. See:- MADPET CONCERNED ABOUT THE UNFAIRNESS OF THE HEARING OF APPLICATION BYKHO JABING CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A COURT OF APPEAL DECISION BECAUSE JAPHANG WAS ON THAT CORAM.
What happened? Did that judge get 'personal' and let his feelings affect his judgment? At the end of the day, I would say that Kho Jabing became a victim of an unfair trial...would you not agree?
What about Clemency? Surely, afterer the amendment that came into effect, and the case was sent for re-sentencing to the High Court, which decided that Kho Jabing should not be hanged, and the appeal to the Court of Appeal thereafter that decided that he should be hanged again on a 'split decision' 3-2, Kho Jabing deserves a right to a Clemency consideration - but then the date of execution was fixed so fast, even though the notice that the application for Clemency was forthcoming shortly - and the Clemency Petition was filed - but how could that have been disposed in so few days - more so with the date of hanging being fixed. Pressure was put on the those who had to consider the Clemency application ...and this, too is not right. The Malaysian Bar, Advocates Association of Sarawak and the Sabah Law Association sent a letter to the Singapore President dated 18/5/2016 (see that letter below).
To hang a man to death, surely Singapore should have given more careful consideration and there was no need to rush the execution. Why did Singapore rush the execution of this Malaysian Kho Jabing? Was it in the hope that a speedy execution will make people disinterested in the apparent flaws in the Singapore administration of justice that has led to this execution?
Would Singapore review this case or simply say that Jabing is already dead, so there is no need?
Would we forget and walk away? I hope not - for there are others in similar cases awaiting to be hanged in Singapore...and we should try to make sure that they do not. In any event, I believe that the family of Kho Jabing, if they so do, may have a case against Singapore - but then, if the Singapore courts are going to behave in the manner they did in the past few days - will justice be done?
Maybe Malaysia should consider acting against Singapore to ensure that justice is done - maybe even take this matter up to some international court? [But then, maybe Malaysia is not so bothered about a life of a Srawakian - maybe, if it was little island in dispute, Malaysia will be more interested. And then there is that ASEAN comaraderie ... Will justice be done ...or will it all be 'swept under the carpet' - after all Kho Jabing is just a poor Sarawakian migrant worker of little significance...
What Malaysia did for Kho Jabing also need to raise concerns? What assistance will Malaysia give to Malaysians overseas who need our assistance??
The response of Malaysia's Opposition was also pathetic - Kho Jabing will hang on Friday - what will BN,PKR,DAP,PAS,..do to try and save this Sarawakian?
| Joint Open Letter to the President of the Republic of Singapore | Appeal for Clemency for Kho Jabing |
|
|
|
| Wednesday, 18 May 2016 05:09pm | |
18 May 2016
H.E. Dr Tony Tan Keng Yam
President of the Republic of Singapore
c/o H.E. Vanu Gopala Menon
High Commissioner of the Republic of Singapore to Malaysia
209 Jalan Tun Razak
50400 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
(Delivered by hand)
Your Excellency,
Appeal for Clemency for Kho Jabing
We
are jointly writing to you in our capacities as the Presidents of the
Advocates’ Association of Sarawak, Sabah Law Association and Malaysian
Bar, respectively. We represent approximately 20,000 lawyers who are
practising in Malaysia.
As
Your Excellency may be aware, the prison authorities at Changi Prison,
Singapore had on Thursday, 12 May 2016, written to the family of Kho
Jabing, a Malaysian from Sarawak, to inform them that he will be hanged
on Friday, 20 May 2016. We are concerned that the family has only been
given very short notice of Kho Jabing’s impending hanging.
Kho
Jabing was first sentenced to hang in 2011, pursuant to Singapore’s
mandatory death penalty provisions, when he was found guilty of murder.
However, when provisions were introduced for a review of the mandatory
death penalty, he was resentenced to life in prison and whipping. On a
subsequent appeal by the prosecution, his death sentence was reinstated.
This clearly shows that the prosecution was not satisfied that justice
had been done and that Kho Jabing would pay for his crime by spending
the rest of his life in prison, and be whipped, but actively sought the
imposition of the death penalty.
More
importantly, in the course of his trial, appeal and review, one judge
of the High Court of Singapore and two justices of the Court of Appeal
of Singapore had opined that Kho Jabing had not exhibited a “blatant
disregard for human life” and should therefore not be sentenced to hang.
The
question of whether Kho Jabing should live or die, we respectfully
suggest and humbly submit, should not ultimately depend on the
collective decisions of a majority of judges. The fact that learned
judges of Singapore have expressed doubts that Kho Jabing exhibited
sufficient mens rea or intention to commit the crime of murder should,
in and of itself, give rise to concerns whether Kho Jabing should be
made to pay the ultimate price for his crime and be sentenced to hang.
If there is any doubt at all about his level of intention, and there
genuinely is, that doubt must be resolved in Kho Jabing’s favour.
This
is not, we wish to clarify, a questioning of the system of justice in
Singapore. Kho Jabing was found to have committed a crime, and we
accept that. Neither is this a questioning of the sovereignty of the
nation of Singapore or the jurisdiction of the courts of Singapore.
Laws passed by Singapore’s own legislature have provided for a review
of the mandatory death sentence. The doubts that have been raised have
been so raised by Singapore’s own judges.
This
is an appeal for a reconsideration of the case and the grant of mercy.
We ask Your Excellency to take into account that there is genuine doubt
whether a death sentence is justified in this case. The death penalty
is an irreversible punishment. Once taken, Kho Jabing’s life cannot be
returned to him or his family.
We
therefore sincerely implore Your Excellency to exercise Your
Excellency’s discretion with respect to the power of pardon and to
commute Kho Jabing’s sentence to that of imprisonment, and to stop his
execution once and for all.
We thank Your Excellency for considering this call for clemency.
Yours sincerely,
Leonard Shim
President
Advocates’ Association of Sarawak
Brenndon Soh
President
Sabah Law Association
Steven Thiru
President
Malaysian Bar
|
The life of Kho Jabing
He grew up in a longhouse and was very close to his little sister Jumai, who turns 28 years old today.
He worked on a family plantation, then as a technician laying cables
in Miri before moving to Singapore to earn a better wage to help his
family.
He called his mother twice a day - once when he woke up in the morning, and once before going to bed at night.
He got very drunk one night - we don't know how drunk exactly, or how
much the excessive levels of Ethanol he had consumed affected his
mental capacity, because this was never established properly in court.
He did a very stupid, awful thing. Even a High Court judge said his choice of weapon was impulsive.
He didn't mean to kill a man, but he did.
For this one moment of violence our Singaporean criminal justice system began to exact a slow, steady vengeance.
We sentenced him to death, then life, then death again.
He sat in prison for nine years knowing he was waiting to be taken to die.
The Cabinet decided on clemency, the president signed the warrant, the prisons scheduled the execution.
His family were told to buy clothes for his pre-execution photo
shoot, and to make funeral preparations for a man who was, at that time,
neither critically ill nor dead.
There is no death, no murder, more premeditated than what happened today.
Last night, as Jabing's legal team scrambled and struggled to prepare
for their sudden 9am appeal hearing, Jumai told me that Jabing had
wanted her to celebrate her birthday.
"Don't worry about me," he'd told her. "You should celebrate your
birthday and not think about me. When you blow out the candles, you have
to think that I am by your side."
I write this now because we are so often detached from and ignorant of the people the state kills in our name.
We think of them as soulless monsters, as "human trash" that needs to be thrown out.
We think of them as statistics in the Singapore Prison Service's annual reports.
Very often, we don't think of them at all. (It is likely that another
man was executed this morning, but we don't even know his name).
But we need to see death row inmates for who they are: people who
have made mistakes, people who have made bad decisions, people who might
have been cruel, but also people who have families, who have struggles,
who are full of contradictions like us.
They laugh, cry, joke, dream, hate and fear like any other person.
But unlike any other person, they will one day know, down to the minute, when they will die. And all they can do is wait.
Yesterday in court Jabing gave us activists a big wave. Then he bowed and smiled.
He was executed today, hours after the Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal for a stay of execution.
I'm sharing the photos his family has shared with me.
The government says it kills people like Jabing to keep us safe.
I don't know how Jabing's death has kept me safe; it's simply made me
feel more hurt, more outraged and more fearful of a cold state
machinery that knows no compassion, that would rush a man to his death
out of procedural efficiency.
But if Jabing died in all our names, the least we could do is see these photos and know his face.
#RIP Kho Jabing. 1984 - 2016.
KIRSTEN HAN is a freelance journalist in Singapore and is a founding
member of 'We Believe in Second Chances', a group campaigning for the
abolition of the death penalty.
Malaysian hanged in Singapore after final appeal rejected
Execution carried out, say police, after court denies appeal by Kho Jabing, sentenced to death in 2010 for murder
A Malaysian murder convict has been hanged in Singapore, according to police, hours after the city-state’s highest court rejected a final appeal against his execution.
“A 32-year-old male Malaysian national, Jabing Kho, had his death
sentence carried out on 20 May 2016 at Changi prison complex,” the
Singapore police force said in a statement on Friday.
Kho, who was sentenced to death in 2010 for the murder of a Chinese
construction worker, had been due to hang in the prison at dawn on
Friday, but was granted a brief last-minute reprieve after his lawyer filed a challenge.
The court of appeal heard the latest plea on Friday morning but said
it raised no new arguments about the 2008 robbery attempt, clearing the
way for the execution.
“This case has been about many things but today, it’s about the abuse
of the process of the court,” said the appeal court judge, Chao Hick
Tin. Allowing Kho to continue with legal challenges would throw the
judicial system into disrepute, he added.
Executions in Singapore are normally carried out by hanging at dawn on Fridays.
After Kho was sentenced to death in 2010, Singapore amended its
mandatory death penalty for murder, giving judges the discretion to
impose life imprisonment under certain circumstances.
Kho’s case was reviewed and he was re-sentenced to a life term in
2013. But state prosecutors appealed against that ruling and his death
sentence was reinstated in January 2015. He was scheduled for execution
on 6 November last year but another last-minute appeal saved him.
Kho’s accomplice had his conviction for murder overturned and was
sentenced to more than 18 years in prison and 19 strokes of the cane.
Singapore, which has rejected rights groups’ calls to abolish the
death penalty, executed four people in 2015, one for murder and three
for drug offences, according to prison statistics.
Malaysia
also uses capital punishment, executing murderers and drug traffickers
by hanging, a system that, as in Singapore, dates back to British
colonial rule. - Guardian, 20/5/2016
No comments:
Post a Comment