Tuesday, October 02, 2018

Anwar dan Saiful? Siapa yang Menipu? Kenapa tindakan belum diambil terhadap yang 'menipu' di Mahkamah?

Anwar Ibrahim atau Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan adalah penipu, berasaskan dakwaan Anwar,  dan kini kedua-dua bertanding untuk menjadi Ahli Parlimen Port Dickson. Ini adalah keadaan yang agak lucu.

Seseorang yang menipu di Mahkamah yang membawa kepada seseorang yang tidak bersalah disabitkan dan dihukum penjara atau mati atau sebatan TIDAK  harus dilepaskan gitu sahaja. Orang sedemikian harus disiasat dan dituduh di Mahkamah.

Anwar, time to investigate, prosecute and fair trial for all false witnesses, bad prosecutors and judges?...travesty or miscarriage of justice?



Ya, Saudara Anwar Ibrahim telah terus mendakwa bahawa beliau tidak bersalah ....tetapi adakah beliau sudah membuat lapuran polis mendakwa Saiful dan/atau saksi lain telah menipu. Jika belum, kenapa tidak? Kini pun, setelah Pakatan Harapan sudah menjadi kerajaan, kes ini boleh dibuka semula dan semua yang telah menipu termasuk di Mahkamah harus disiasat, dituduh dan dikenakan hukuman sewajarnya. Berapa tahun yang Anwar terpaksa merungut di penjara?

Untuk mengulangkaji keputusan Mahkamah yang menyabitkan beliau, adalah langkah perlu tetapi, mengikut pendapat saya, tidak mencukupi. Mengapa? Seseorang akan disabitkan tuduhan sekiranya pihak pendakwaan berjaya membuktikan di Mahkamah 'beyond reasonable doubt'(melebihi keraguan munasabah) - biasanya ini lebih kurang 99% - ya, tahap yang sangat tinggi ...hampir kepastiian. Sekira pihak pendakwaan tidak dapat buktikan sampai tahap ini, sidituduh tidak akan disabitkan.Justeru, tak ada kepastian bahawa yang dituduh sebenarnya tidak melakukan kesalahan yang didakwa dilakukan...

Untuk kepastian, dan didalam kes Anwar ini, untuk mendapatkan kepastian Saiful perlu didapati bersalah menipu...dan mungkin juga saksi yang lain.

Kini, penumpuan kepada Shafee Abdullah, ada kini dakwaan bahawa Najib telah membayar Shafee lebih kurang RM9.5juta. Adakah ini ada kena mengena dengan kes Mahkamah Persekutuan bila Shafee telah dilantik sebagai Pendakwa khas...(special prosecutor)..

Jika pun ya, persoalan yang timbul adalah bagaimana seorang pegawai pendakwa melakukan 'kesalahan' yang membawa kepada kekalahan Anwar Ibrahim di Mahkamah Persekutuan. Yang membuat keputusan, adalah para Hakim di Mahkamah - justeru adakah Hakim tersebut telah mengambil 'rasuah'...atau telah 'diugut'...atau 'diperintah' memberi penghakiman tidak berpihak kepada Anwar Ibrahim? Adakah bukti sedemikian wujud dan akan dikemukakan Anwar semasa bicara 'penyemakan semula' penghakiman? Jika itu berlaku, ertinya tindakan keras juga harus diambil terhadap Hakim-hakim berkenaan. Setakat ini, adakah apa-apa aduan polis atau aduan yang mendakwa bahawa Hakim-hakim berkenaan telah dirasuah... diugut ...dipaksa ...diarahkan ...untuk tidak melakukan tugas dan tanggungjawab sebagai hakim? Anwar perlu membuat aduan sedemikian sekarang...dan Hakim yang melakukan kesalahan sedemikian harus letak jawatan atau 'dibuang'.

Pendakwa raya dalam mana-mana kes akan hanya boleh membentangkan keterangan dan berhujah. Di dalam kes di peringkat rayuan, kemungkinan tidak ada keterangan baru ...justeru hanya boleh berhujah sahaja berasaskan keterangan sedia ada...mungkin membawa perhatian Mahkamah Rayuan kepada kesilapan Hakim sebelum menilai keterangan dan undang-undang...itu saja. Ini pendapat saya...

Shafee kini didakwa menerima wang kotor(money laundering)...dan tidak mendedahkan pendapatan kepada Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negara...Justeru, jika pun, Shafee dibayar Najib, apakah kaitan dengan kes Anwar Ibrahim? Mungkin di masa akan datang, kita akan diberitahu lebih...

PENGAMPUNAN - adalah 'kamu dimaafkan' bukan kamu sebenarnya tidak bersalah. Pengampunan  akan membawa kepada pengurangan hukuman, yang mungkin akan juga bererti dibebaskan segera, serta juga akan membenarkan seseorang hak segera boleh bertanding jadi MP/ADUN... Kepercayaan YDP Agung bahawa Anwar bersalah hanya itu...itu juga kepercayaan ramai orang. Jika hasil penyemakkan semula keputusan Mahkamah, membawa kepada keputusan menyokong Anwar - itu akan menyatakan bahawa Mahkamah mendapati Anwar tidak bersalah..itu lebih baik. 

Anwar's Pardon - Meaning, Validity and Matters concerning Attorney General?


TETAPI jika dibuktikan bahawa Saiful sebenarnya telah MENIPU, termasuk di Mahkamah, itu akan lebih menyakinkan semua..

Pada pendapat saya, apa yang dilakukan oleh dua inidividu di ruang peribadi tidak harus di jadikan JENAYAH. Jika ia dilakukan secara paksa tanpa persetujuan pasangan, ia menjadi kesalahan ROGOL. 

Harus juga diingatkan kembali, bahawa Anwar hanya menjadi 'REFORMIS' bila beliau dipecat sebagai Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan seterusnya dikeluarkan dari UMNO...

PERHIMPUNAN AMAN Reformasi yang berlaku berkali-kali di Kuala Lumpur sebenarnya bukan sahaja berkenaan isu mahu Anwar diambil balik sebagai TPM atau membantah cara Anwar dipecat tetapi mengenai banyak isu lain ...ketidakpuas hati rakyat dengan kerajaan semasa. Laungan 'REFORMASI' mungkin hasil janaan Anwar tetapi protes REFORMASI adalah berkenaan banyak isu tidak puas hati dengan kerajaan semasa...Tanya sahaja mereka yang protes...

Selepas Anwar dibebaskan, ramai yang gembira kerana Anwar yang dilihat menjadi mangsa ketidakadilan telah akhirnya bebas...TETAPI ini sebenarnya bukan sokongan untuk Anwar menjadi Perdana Menteri ...atau 'politik' Anwar?

Justeru, beberapa bulan selepas itu, 'sokongan' Anwar berkurangan ...dan bila ditangkap dan dituduh liwat kali kedua, Anwar Ibrahim sekali lagi kembali menjadi 'popular'...khususnya di mata  media dan mungkin juga komuniti antarabangsa... 

Kini akibat PENGAMPUNAN, beliau dibebaskan awal beberapa minggu ...dan dibenarkan bertanding untuk jadi MP/ADUN...

HAKIKAT adalah hanya jika pembangkang bersatu, ada peluang menumpaskan UMNO-BN. PKR nampaknya(bukan pasti) telah mengenakan beberapa SYARAT - antaranya semua parti PH perlu setuju bahawa Anwar akan segera diampunkan, bahawa Anwar akan menjadi Perdana Menteri mengantikan Dr. Mahathir dan juga bahawa PKR akan diberikan kerusi MP/ADUN terbanyak...jika tak setuju, PKR mungkin juga tidak akan menjadi parti dalam PH? Begitu juga parti lain pun mungkin ada syarat masing-masing? Tidak salah jika ada syarat...tetapi, bagi saya, objektif utama adalah menumpaskan kerajaan UMNO-BN dan menubuhkan kerajaan ALTERNATIF yang akan berasaskan keadilan, hak asasi, demokrasi dan kebebasan.

Menang PH - kesemua syarat perjanjian antara parti PH kepada PKR dipatuhi kecuali satu lagi iaitu persetujuan bahawa Anwar akan jadi PM seterusnya selepas Mahathir mungkin dalam 2 atau 3 atau 5 tahun lagi. 

Kini, Anwar mencuba jadi MP di Port Dickson kerana hanya MP boleh jadi Perdana Menteri. 

Tetapi ramai tak berapa suka cara, iaitu 'PD Move' - tidakkah Anwar boleh bersabar sehingga sebuah kerusi Parlimen jadi kosong mungkin kerana kematian MP sedia ada.... Ramai tak suka MP PD terdahulu tiba-tiba meletak jawatan tanpa pun rundingan dan persetujuan pengundi dan penyokongnya... Baca pos sebelum ini...

MP Danyal folly? Anwar? Unnecessary waste of our monies? Betrayal? Hero?


Jika Anwar belum jadi MP, beliau juga sebagai seorang daripada kepimpinan Pakatan Harapan boleh membawa REFORMASI...tetapi masalah kini, semua masih tertanya-tanya apa 'reformasi' yang perlu dibawa lebih daripada apa yang kerajaan PH membuat sekarang...Anwar tidak menyatakan secara khusus apa yang perlu dibuat lagi oleh kerajaan PH, dan jika beliau berbuat demikian, kerajaan PH akan melakukannya...sebab Anwar Ibrahim adalah seorang daripada 4 pemimpin UTAMA PH pada masa ini. Sebagai Presiden akan datang PKR, besar lagi pengaruh beliau dalam kerajaan PH pada masa ini...

Dia boleh minta perkara khusus yang masih belum dilakukan dilakukan dengan kadar segera...saperti naik Gaji Minima RM1,500(bantah cadangan kerajaan menaikkannya kepada RM1,050) - tapi beliau tak menyatakan apa-apa..Beliau boleh seru kerajaan jangan melengahkan pemansuhan SOSMA, Akta Hasutan, POCA, POTA dan undang-undang tahanan tanpa bicara,...Beliau tak menyatakan apa-apa. Beliau hanya setakat ini hanya menimbulkan isu hak Melayu ...tetapi itu pun tak jelas, adakah dia mahu tambahkan kuota Melayu? Anwar Ibrahim - 'Malay Malaysian Rights' Do Not Exist? Only 'Quotas'? EXPLAIN please...

Ya, Anwar sentiasa dikaitkan dengan 'REFORMASI' tetapi beliau sering tak menyatakan dengan jelas apa yang harus dilakukan. Adakah beliau mahu 'rahsiakan' semua sehingga beliau sendiri menjadi Perdana Menteri - itu mungkin tindakan wajar sekiranya BN-UMNO masih memerintah...tetapi kini Pakatan Harapan sudah memerintah dan beliau harus bersuara supaya 'visi' atau idea beliau segera dilaksanakan...Jangan sampai jadi PM...Tabiat atau sifat sebegini nampaknya memberi gambaran bahawa Anwar, bila ia melaungkan 'REFORMASI" hanya bermaksud bahawa beliau sendiri menjadi Perdana Menteri (ini, saya harap tak benar?)

Apakah sebenarnya yang Anwar Ibrahim mahu selain daripada menjadi Perdana Menteri?

Mengapa tak sabar...mahu kini jadi MP - adakah ini ada kaitan dengan pilihanraya partinya sendiri, PKR? Ada ura-ura bahawa dalam pilihanraya PKR yang sedang dijalankan, ada yang bertanding bukan mereka yang akan sentiasa menuruti arahan/perintah/kehendak Anwar ...di mana Anwar mungkin risau, jika mereka yang mempunyai personaliti sedemikian, akan kemudian mengambil pendirian Anwar Ibrahim tak perlu menjadi Perdana Menteri seterusnya jika ada calun lain yang lebih dipercayai dan berkebolehan muncul. Apakah yang terbaik untuk Malaysia? Keinginan peribadi harus tidak diberikan keutamaan lebih daripada 'apa yang terbaik untuk Malaysia?'. MUngkin masa Anwar sudah berlalu..

Kini, di Port Dickson ada 7 orang yang bertanding menjadi MP Port Dickson...termasuk Saiful, di mana dakwaannya yang menyebabkan Anwar dituduh dan dipenjara...

Semua orang sedar, jika pun Pakatan Harapan kalah di Port Dickson, ianya tidak cukup untuk melakukan apa-apa kepada kerajaan Pakatan Harapan. Jika calun BN bertanding, kemungkinan pasti kalah...dan tidak ada calun BN. Calun PAS ada dimana mereka sebelum ini mungkin jadi lawan kuat tetapi berita kerjasama dengan UMNO mungkin akan ada kesan...Akhirkata, pengundi mungkin perlu lihat sifat dan peribadi setiap calun dan undi yang terbaik menjadi MP. Isu perkauman dan agama harus diketepikan...

Jika Anwar kalah di Port Dickson pun tak ada isu, beliau boleh bertanding pilihanraya kecil kerusi Parlimen yang akan datang...mungkin dalam masa setahun atau kurang.

ANWAR kini nampak bersalam dengan Saiful yang telah mendakwa Anwar telah meliwatnya ...Jika Anwar tidak memulakan tindakan terhadap Saiful dan yang lain yang menyebabkan beliau disabit dan dihukum...ramai yang akan mula curiga? Siapa yang menipu? Saiful atau Anwar? 

Jikapun Anwar bersalah, beliau sudah menjalankan hukumannya...dan seterusnya juga telah diampun. Silap atau kesalahan lepas tidak harus prejudis Anwar. Apa yang penting adalah nilai, prinsip, apa yang dia perjuangkan,....

Pos berkaitan sebelum ini:-

Anwar to focus on campaign, not bothered by Mohd Saiful

EYE ON THE PRIZE ... Pakatan Harapan (PH) candidate for the Port Dickson by-election, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said he has his eyes on the prize in Port Dickson and not former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, who would also be contesting for the parliamentary seat. — Sunpix by Adib Rawi Yahya

PORT DICKSON: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has urged PKR supporters not to resort to personal attacks during the campaign period for the Port Dickson by-election.

The PKR's president-elect was referring to an incident where his former aide Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, who is contesting as an independent candidate in the Port Dickson polls, was loudly booed during the nomination process earlier today.

The boos rang out each time his name was mentioned by the returning officer Khairy Maamor at the nomination centre in the Port Dickson Municipal Council hall.

"I will advise them of course but then you have to consider his malicious efforts in the past.

"It is easier to say that, for me to forgive and move on, but also to appreciate the concerns of many who were deeply hurt and suffered in the process," Anwar said during a press conference after the nomination process.

Anwar also added that he is not interested in Saiful's campaign for the Port Dickson by-election.

He said he would instead be concentrating on his own campaign to win the parliamentary seat.

"It's up to Saiful (to use the sodomy issue as campaign material). I don't want to interfere. I am concentrating on my task, which is to strengthen the government under the leadership of Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, and to ensure we fulfil our commitments to Port Dickson voters and people," he said.

Earlier, the two candidates shared an awkward moment when they briefly shook hands before entering the nomination centre.

In 2008, Saiful accused Anwar of sodomising him in an apartment in Damansara. Following a series of court trials and appeals, Anwar was found guilty by the Federal Court and subsequently sentenced to a five-year jail term in February 2015.

A week after Pakatan Harapan's victory in the May 9 polls, he was released after being granted a royal pardon. - Sun Daily, 29/9/2018


New evidence may lead to Anwar's conviction being overturned, say lawyers


Bede Hong
PKR president-elect Anwar Ibrahim (pic) says his lawyers have received an affidavit signed by an Attorney-General's Chambers officer backing his claim that Umno lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah was paid RM9.5 million after prosecuting him. – The Malaysian Insight pic by Nazir Sufari, September 7, 2018.
FRESH evidence that Muhammad Shafee Abdullah received RM9.5 million for his services as an ad hoc prosecutor in Anwar Ibrahim’s second sodomy trial will likely lead to a new hearing to overturn the conviction, said lawyers.

They said such a hearing, if granted, could proceed independent of any probe into alleged wrongdoing.

Anwar, who was convicted in 2014 and jailed a year later, yesterday said his lawyers had received an affidavit signed by an Attorney-General’s Chambers officer backing his claim that the Umno lawyer was paid the amount after prosecuting him.

The officer claimed that former prime minister Najib Razak had issued two cheques on September 11, 2013 and February 14, 2014, for RM4.3 million and RM5.2 million, respectively, and that Shafee received the money in his account on September 13, 2013 and February 17, 2014.

Anwar, who is the PKR president-elect, previously said Najib had paid Shafee from September 2013 to February 2014, when the lawyer was made a special prosecutor in his sodomy appeal at the Federal Court.
Lawyers said the evidence would likely bolster Anwar’s appeal against a high court decision in February, which struck out a previous application to overturn his conviction due to a lack of evidence.

“The new evidence came to Anwar’s knowledge after the application was struck out,” said Sankara Nair, who represented Anwar in both sodomy trials.

“Now, what they want is an application to admit this affidavit as fresh evidence, which was not available at the high court level.”

Anwar had based his application on a Sarawak Report article published in June last year, alleging that the funds transferred came from a bank account that was funded by money stolen by Najib from former 1Malaysia Development Bhd subsidiary SRC International Sdn Bhd, which had borrowed RM4 billion from civil service pension fund Retirement Fund Inc, or KWAP.

Anwar previously said Shafee’s appointment was not free from bias or suspicion, and the prosecution’s integrity was compromised as Shafee was paid by Najib.

He had also applied in vain for a court order to reveal details of Shafee’s personal account.

Shafee last year denied any such payment, and slammed the claim as “nonsense”.

“The Court of Appeal may send the matter back to the high court to be heard,” said Sankara, adding that any police probe into the matter was unlikely to affect the case.

“Whether Shafee is charged later is not the issue here. Ad hoc prosecutors can actually be paid by the government. It’s not an offence, and we cannot speculate.

“However, this new information confirms what was stated in the previous application.

“Now, Anwar has an affidavit confirming that money did get transferred into his (Shafee’s) account.”
Umno lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah (pic) has rubbished as 'nonsense' the claim that he was paid RM9.5 million after prosecuting in Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, September 7, 2018.
Umno lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah (pic) has rubbished as 'nonsense' the claim that he was paid RM9.5 million after prosecuting in Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, September 7, 2018.
Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad today said Putrajaya would look into claims that Shafee had received money from Najib to prosecute Anwar.

However, he said, the probe would prioritise Najib’s wrongdoings.

“The investigation papers on Shafee’s case will have to be opened under the main file, that is, Najib’s,” said Dr Mahathir’s lawyer, Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla.

“This is because the allegation is that the money originated from Najib’s account, which, in itself, is believed to have originated from 1MDB.

“If there is any wrongdoing on Najib’s part, it will be taken to court. If there was criminal wrongdoing, the proper charges will follow suit, against all the culprits.”

He said Shafee would likely continue to act as Najib’s lawyer in the SRC International graft case.

“At this moment, because there are no charges, it would be improper to get him to stop acting (for Najib). To ask a person who may face an investigation to stop carrying on with his life is unfair.

“What if at the end of the day, there are no charges brought against him? One should wait until the investigation is concluded.”

DAP’s national legal bureau chairman, Ramkarpal Singh, called for the fresh evidence to be “thoroughly investigated”.

“Shafee cannot remain silent on such a serious allegation. He must clear the air and categorically deny the same, as his failure to do so will only attract an irresistible inference that his position as a prosecutor in the said appeal was indeed compromised,” said the Bukit Gelugor MP in a statement today.

“RM9.5 million is a lot of money to be paid to a lawyer, irrespective of how good the lawyer is,” said former Malaysian Bar president Christopher Leong.

“However, we have only heard from one side. We should wait to hear from the other side, namely, Shafee and Najib, before making conclusions. As those in law say, ‘audi alteram partem’ (let the other side be heard as well).”

Shafee did not respond to requests for comment.

In May, Anwar received a full pardon from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong for his sodomy convictions, and had the said convictions expunged from records. – September 7, 2018, Malaysian Insight

No comments:

Post a Comment