Saturday, June 14, 2008

Senior citizens living alone can get monthly monetary aid of RM300 BUT is this enough...

1.1495 million Malaysians above the age of 65 years old in 2006, today it will be more. The Ministry's homes are housing only 13,714. There are about 400,000 pensioners(that would be those above 55 years old)... What is the status of the rest of our senior citizens. Those who opted for KWSP(EPF) would have expended all in less than 10 years.

In many towns there are extremely depressing "old folks home" housing usually the Chinese old. Usually, there is no proper bedding let alone full-time staff at these "homes". Wonder whether the government is aware of these homes....

Even the wisest of our senior citizens will find that their calculations for their old-age going hay-wire -- and the increased cost of living may not be having an immediate direct effect save for the increase tension and worry of what will happen tomorrow.

With the increase in fuel-prices and the already high toll-rates, there will lesser "balik kampungs", and this will definitely have its effect on family relations - and families of the "modern" Malaysia would be more nuclear. The concern now is the old. With the rise in the cost of fuel, the visits home will reduce....

Saturday June 14, 2008


Welfare of senior citizens protected

MALAYSIA Nanban reported Women, Family and Community Development Deputy Minister Datuk Noriah Kasnon as saying that the Government had not neglected the welfare of senior citizens in the country.

She said the Government currently managed 19 social welfare homes throughout the country that housed about 13,714 senior citizens and that the ministry organised various programmes to help them.

She added that it was the policy of the ministry that these homes serve healthy food and ensure cleanliness was always maintained.

Senior citizens living alone could apply with their district social welfare offices for monthly monetary aid of RM300, she said.

Noriah was refuting allegations that the Government had ignored the welfare of senior citizens.

Have more non-Malay staff
MIC central working committee member S. Murugesan said the Government must issue a directive to all government departments to ensure more non-Malays were employed in the civil service, reported Makkal Osai.

He was referring to the recent recruitment of 751 assistant enforcement officers by the Road Transport Department (JPJ). Only 15 candidates were non-Malays, of which 10 were Indians.

Other News & Views is compiled from the vernacular newspapers (Bahasa Malaysia, Chinese and Tamil dailies). As such, stories are grouped according to the respective language/medium. Where a paragraph begins with a sub-heading, it denotes a separate news item.

School students to receive RM20 from per month from government from.....????

As expected the prices of everything is going up...up...up and the reason is that Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his BN Government - that is UMNO, MCA, MIC, GERAKAN, PPP.... decided that the price of petrol and diesel should rise.

There was an argument that stated that Pertronas profits by reason of the increase of oil prices globally is more than enough to maintain the SUBSIDY --- and even if there was going to be price increases, it could have done very very s
lowly. With the increase of fuel price, which will translate to an increase of the price of everything -- and there being no changes in income -- there will be greater DESPERATION amongst the people, especially those who were just making enough to live month to month...(them "kais pagi makan pagi" people which I believe is a significant number in Malaysia). It is predicted that there will be MORE crime - the smaller crimes, the robberies without firearms, stolen motorbikes, cars, etc.. After all, by reason of inadequate wages, in Malaysia it is almost impossible to find many families with a sole bread winner. Most wifes/spouses have to work to make ends meet -- and because of that, we needed to get foreign domestic workers (now there are over 300,000 in Malaysia) because some one was needed to be at home when both parents are working.... Our development has been very lop-sided....and surely Malaysians can maybe "see it" but not really "feel it" or "experience it".

Would like to also share with you our fromer PM's comments on the increase of petrol/diesel price, taken from his blog (chedet.com.)


The price of crude oil has increased by 400 percent in the last three years. It follows that the price of products must increase, sooner or later. In other countries petrol prices had already increased. In the United Kingdom one litre of petrol sells for more than one pound sterling or RM7. In the United States it is about RM5. That the price in neighbouring countries has gone up is shown by the rush to fill up by Thai and to a lesser extent Singapore vehicles. The Government has now announced an increase in petrol price by 78 sen to RM2.70 per litre, an increase of more than 40 per cent.

I may be mistaken but there seems to be less vehicles on the road today. But obviously that is not all that will happen. All other consumer goods, services and luxury goods would increase in price.

The cost of living must go up. Put another way there will be inflation and the standard of living will go down.

Obviously our increase in petrol price is far less than in the United Kingdom or the United States. But
our per capita income is about one-third of theirs. In purchasing power terms our increase is more than in the UK or the US.

The increase hurts but the pain is greater not just because of the increase percentage-wise is higher than in developed countries but because of the manner the increase is made.

A few days ago the Government decided to ban sale of petrol to foreign cars. It flipped. Now foreign cars can buy again. Flopped.

Knowing that in a few days it was going to raise the price and foreigners would be allowed to buy, why cannot the Government just wait instead of banning and unbanning.

But
be that as it may what could the Government have done to lessen the burden on the people that results from the increase in petrol price.

In the first place the Government should not have floated the Ringgit. A floating rate creates uncertainties and we cannot gain anything from the strengthened Ringgit. Certainly the people have not experienced any increase in their purchasing power because of the appreciation in the exchange rate between the US Dollar and the Ringgit.

Actually the Ringgit has increased by about 80 sen (from RM3.80 to RM3.08 to 1 US Dollar) per US D
ollar, i.e. by more than 20 per cent. Had the Government retained the fixed rate system and increased the value of the Ringgit, say 10 per cent at a time, the cost of imports, in Ringgit terms can be monitored and reduced by 10 per cent. At 20 per cent appreciation the cost of imports should decrease by 20 per cent. But we know the prices of imported goods or services have not decreased at all. This means we are paying 20 per cent higher for our imports including the raw material and components for our industries.

Since oil prices are fixed in US Dollar, the increase in US Dollar prices of oil should also be mitigated by 20 per cent in Malaysian Ringgit.

But the Government wants to please the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and decided to float the Ringgit. As a result the strengthening of the Ringgit merely increased our cost
of exports without giving our people the benefit of lower cost of imports.

This is not wisdom after the event. I had actually told a Government Minister not to float the Ringgit three years ago. But of course I am not an expert, certainly I know little about the international financial regimes.

I believe the people expect the increase of petrol price. But what they are angry about is the quantum and the suddenness. The Prime Minister was hinting at August but suddenly it came two months earlier, just after the ban on sale of petrol to foreigners.

If the increase had been more gradual, the people would not feel it so much. But of course this mea
ns that the Government would have to subsidise, though to a decreasing extent.

Can the Government subsidise? I am the “adviser” to Petronas but I know very little about it beyond what is published in its accounts. What I do know may not be very accurate but should be sufficient for me to draw certain conclusions.

Roughly Malaysia produces 650,000 barrels of crude per day. We consume 400,000 barrels leaving 250,000 barrels to be exported.

Three years ago the selling price of crude was about USD30 per barrel. Today it is USD130 – an increase of USD100. There is hardly any increase in the production cost so that the extra USD100 can be considered as pure profit.

Our 250,000 barrels of export should earn us 250,000 x 100 x 365 x 3 = RM27,375,000,000 (twenty seven billion Ringgit).

But Petronas made a profit of well over RM70 billion, all of which belong to the Government.

By all accounts the Government is flushed with money.

But besides petrol the prices of palm oil, rubber and tin have also increased by about 400 per cent. Plantation companies and banks now earn as much as RM3 billion in profits each. Taxes paid by them must have also increased greatly.

I feel sure that maintaining the subsidy and gradually decreasing it would not hurt the Government finances.

In the medium term ways and means must be found to reduce wasteful consumption and increase income. We may not be able to fix the minimum wage at a high level but certainly we can improve the minimum wage.

Actually our wages are high compared to some of our neighbours. The investors who come here are attracted not by cheap labour but by other factors, among which is the attitude of the Government towards the business community and the investors in particular.

From what I hear business friendliness is wanting in the present Government – so much so that even Malaysians are investing in other countries. There are rumblings about political affiliations influencing decisions. Generally Government politicians are said to be arrogant.

Malaysia is short of manpower. The labour intensive industries are not benefiting Malaysians. Foreign workers are remitting huge sums of money home.

The industria
l policy must change so that high tech is promoted in order to give Malaysians higher wages to cope with rising costs of living.

The world is facing economic turmoil due to the depreciation of the US Dollar, the sub-prime loan crisis, rising oil and raw material prices, food shortages and the continued activities of the greedy hedge funds. The possibility of a US recession is real. In a way the US is already in recession. The world economy will be dragged down by it.

Malaysia will be affected by all these problems. I wonder whether the Government is prepared for this.

We cannot avoid all the negative effects but there must be ways to mitigate against them and to less
en the burden that must be borne by all Malaysians. I am sure the Government will not just pass all these problems to the people as the review of oil prices every month seem to suggest.



Saturday June 14, 2008


Canteen food costlier now

By ANN TAN

GEORGE TOWN: Pupils in some schools here have not been spared from spiralling prices – food in the canteen now cost between 10 sen and 30 sen more a plate.

A check by The Star yesterday found that several school canteens in Penang started charging the new prices after the recent mid-year holidays.

While parents complain about having to give their children more pocket money, canteen operators claim they have no choice but to increase prices to cover costs.

Canteen operator Yeoh Leng Kee, 70, said he had maintained prices for years but was no longer able to do so without incurring losses.

Feeling the pinch: Students lining up to buy food at a school canteen in George Town on Friday. Canteen operators claim they have no choice but to increase prices to cover costs.

“With the increased prices of flour, petrol and so on, I have had to raise the price of my char koay teow from RM1.50 to RM1.70. But I only did so after getting the school’s approval,” said Yeoh, who operates a canteen at a school in Green Lane.

Teh Chooi Pheng, 43, who sells economy rice, said she increased the price of each dish by 10 sen, adding that it would otherwise have been difficult to survive.

“We need to earn a living besides paying a monthly rental of RM300 to the school,” she added.

A roti canai seller, Khairuddin Mustafa Wan, 42, said his school canteen committee was meeting next week and he hoped they would allow the canteen to adjust prices to cover costs.

Year Five pupil Tan Qiao Yan, 10, said she tried to cut down eating at her school canteen by bringing food from home.

“My pocket money is limited, so I cannot afford to eat in the canteen too much now that the food costs more,” she said.

Student Nor Tasnim Abdul Aziz, 16, said her mother gave her RM100 monthly for food and it was not enough to cover the increase in prices.

A parent, Chew Soong Meng, 36, said the 20 sen to 30 sen increase was quite steep for school children.

A father of two school-going boys, Terrence Ng, said the price increase was reasonable but felt the food portion should also be increased.

“I have recently increased my sons’ pocket money to make sure they get enough food in school,” he said, adding that his two sons, aged 12 and 13, were big eaters.

Another parent, Quah Lean Hong, 49, said she disagreed with the price increase of canteen food as most families already had to put up with higher expenses following the fuel hike.

A senior staff member of a secondary school in Gottlieb Road said the school authorities had received a request from their canteen operator to raise prices and understood their plight.

“We still hope they will cooperate with us and maintain prices for the time being,” she said, adding that the school would discuss with the board the possibility of reducing stall rentals.

The little man should also be allowed to increase prices....to be fair.

Taxi Drivers want fares to increase. Retailers, Restaurants, Sundry Shops, Vegetable Sellers, .. want prices to increase -- and this is fair.....UNLESS...

Sometime the government tries to do stupid things like telling them that they cannot increase prices and fares - and this is really rather unfair, when their COST has really increased and the maintenance of "old prices and rates" will only translate in a reduction of profits and income.

The only way for the government to keep prices of certain items, fares, etc low is for the government to provide SUBSIDIES (or compensation) to ensure that the COST remains the same - hence NO NEED to increase prices.

Any increase of prices and the rakyat(the consumer) does not suffer....that is FACT.

That "not-so-smart" BN government seem to have really not considered the full implication of increasing FUEL prices -- what about the BAS SEKOLAH charges, transport vans/busses for workers, what about the increased cost of getting to work....

Now when it comes to the BIG BOYS - the government seem not bothered about them increasing charges, etc...

ASTRO
- they have increased charges, like recently they just pushed that 211 channel which contained a lot of soap operas in this new Maharaj Channel and charged about RM10 for that..and now they have that Astro On Demand where all good movies are...And I remember, when they started they said that we have to pay so that we can enjoy "advertisement-free" viewing. ASTRO also enjoys special treatment as they seem to be exempt from even the requirement of providing at the very least Bahasa Malaysia subtitles. And do look at some of the Bahasa Malaysia programs, the kind of language being used is pathetic and that is why the standard of language is on the decline.. Why is the government not doing anything....

Well talk about television - been shopping around for an aerial not wanting to be dependent on that ASTRO control - and guess what, the price for a workable TV arial is now RM250-00 (mind you that you can get a TV for that price today). Usi
ng cheaper arials do not give you good reception -- WHY? They have not been developing those necessary transmission towers as they should since that ASTRO and its satelite disc came into the picture. In short ASTRO controls - and even for the free channels like RTM1, RTM 2,..., the consumer has to pay a minimum of RM37-95 - this is very wrong - it should be FREE (maybe the only requirement be the getting of a Satelite Disc and the Decoder) - if not the government must continue to ensure that ordinary transmission is improved and consumers can use their ordinary TV aerials.

Look
at TNB -- electricity rates were increased and then we see that this TNB is making TOO MUCH profits, and the government is pleased. Why more profits? Beacuse the normal person is being charged higher and higher rates. (Just found out that rumah-kedai/the shop-house, that upstairs of shops that people stay is today being charged commercial rates.....mmmm. Should all residential premises be charged residential rates.

In October 2007, it was reported that TNB net profits increased by 88%....and so I ask what really is the justification of inceasing electricity rates..
"Tenaga Nasional Bhd's net profit by 88% to a record RM4.06bil for the financial year (FY) ended Aug 31, against RM2.16bil previously." (the said Star report is pasted below..)

At the end of the day, it is the small businessman, farmer...the SMALL PERSON who is being asked to keep prices down make less profits....BUT not the Big Boys...this is not at all fare.

I say that the government must get its priorities right - and place more importance on the good of the RAKYAT and less on them BIG Companies and their shareholders. Fuel Prices must come down....electricity tariffs must come down... and RI
CH Malaysia has the requisite capacity to do that...




Saturday June 14, 2008

Cabbies to raise fare unless they get subsidised petrol

By TEH ENG HOCK

PETALING JAYA: Cabbies will raise their fares unless they receive subsidised petrol.

Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Indian Taxi Owners and Drivers Association secretary S. Balakrishnan said they wanted to be part of the fleet card system too so that they could buy petrol below pump price.

Under the fleet card system currently used by buses and lorries, diesel is sold at RM1.43 a litre compared with the pump price of RM2.58.

“Not all the 26,000 taxis in the country run on natural gas. And there are not many natural gas pumps in the country. The queue is always long and a lot of times we have no choice but to pump petrol,” Balakrishnan said.

During the recent fuel price hike, the price of natural gas remained unchanged at 63sen per litre.

Balakrishnan said he hoped taxi drivers would be issued fleet cards entitling them to buy petrol at RM1.35 per litre, half the pump price of RM2.70.

“If not, we will have to increase our fares. We would like to start the first kilometre at RM4 instead of RM2.

“We will maintain the rate of 10sen for every subsequent 150m. When the cab is idle, like during traffic jams, we want it to be 10sen for every 20 seconds instead of 45 seconds,” he said.

Another way to avert the fare increase is to install gas pumps at all petrol stations and not limit them to Petronas stations.

“That way, we can go on with our business of transporting people and not waste time queuing up. It is even okay if they want to raise the price of natural gas to RM1 per litre.”

____

Friday October 26, 2007

TNB profit soars 88%

By KATHY FONG and YVONNE TAN



Chairman: Impractical not to expect tariff change given spiralling costs

KUALA LUMPUR: Stronger power demand growth and foreign exchange gains boosted Tenaga Nasional Bhd's net profit by 88% to a record RM4.06bil for the financial year (FY) ended Aug 31, against RM2.16bil previously.

Revenue rose 14% to RM23.3bil on a 13.6% increase in electricity sales. Earnings per share (EPS) expanded to 94.92 sen from 52.52 sen previously.

TNB declared a final gross dividend per share of 16.3 sen, bringing the total for the year to 36.3 sen, representing 40% of the group's free cashflow.

Chief executive Datuk Seri Che Khalib Mohamad Noh, however, warned that the year ahead would be challenging for the national utility group amid rising fuel costs and increased payments to the fully completed Tanjung Bin power plant in Johor.

“Financial year 2008 will be a challenging year,” he said at the group's annual financial results announcement yesterday.

Che Khalib admitted that it would be difficult for TNB to achieve the consensus net profit forecast of RM3.6bil in FY08.

Foreign exchange gains and the write-back on taxation accounted for nearly RM1bil of TNB's earnings.

Analysts said the group's profit may shrink if the contribution from these two items were to decline in FY08.

Che Khalib said the price of coal, the main fuel for power generation besides gas, had gone up substantially, adding that it would erode TNB's earnings in FY08.

He said the company had hedged 50% of the group's coal requirements for next year at US$50, against the current market price of above US$70.

Analysts said fuel costs would be the wild card for the utility giant's earnings, adding that the sustainable growth of power demand might help cushion the adverse impact of higher fuel costs.

Kenanga Investment Bank equity research sees electricity demand growing between 5.8% and 6.4% in FY08.

“The main concern for the company, going forward, is the rise in the price of coal.

“The company has locked in only half of its coal requirements for FY08, so this could be quite an issue,'' OSK equity research analyst Tursina Yaacob said.

TNB shares have sunk in the past few months as the fortunes of the utility stock were clouded by uncertainties over the Government's decision to raise gas prices, which would take a toll on its earnings in the absence of a pass-through mechanism.

The blue chip has fallen RM1.45, or 13%, since the beginning of the year. It closed at RM9.35 yesterday.

Che Khalib said electricity tariff would “naturally have to go up” if the Government removed the subsidy on gas. He expects the impact of the gas price hike to be “neutral “ for TNB.

Chairman Tan Sri Leo Moggie said the country's current energy prices did not reflect the true costs.

The former Energy, Communications and Multimedia Minister said it was not “practical” to expect no change in electricity tariff given the spiralling fuel costs.

For the fourth quarter ended Aug 31, TNB's net profit was sharply lower at RM139.8mil compared with RM745.6mil in the corresponding quarter a year earlier due to a foreign exchange loss of RM549mil.

Quarterly revenue was higher at RM6.1bil versus RM5.6bil in the previous corresponding period. EPS fell to 3.89 sen from 18.07 sen.




Friday, June 13, 2008

BREAKING NEWS - Are we a Democracy or are we a Feudal State?

"King Abdullah" has decided that the next Prime Minister of Malaysia shall be his current deputy Najib Tun Razak.

"Datuk Seri Najib and I have decided on the right time for me to hand over the premiership to him...."

Let us consider the FACTS:-
a) The current government is the Barisan Nasional government, and of course it should have been a matter that should have been discussed and agreed upon by the various d
ifferent component parties ----- BUT NO...it was just "Datuk Seri Najib and I have decided...."

b) The main dominant party in the Barisan Nasional coalition is UMNO (United MALAY National Organisation), and as all past Prime Ministers have been UMNO Presidents, maybe it was a matter that should have been discussed and agreed by that UMNO Supreme Council (MPT) at least-----BUT it seems NO...2 persons who were not even elected by the majority of its party's membership by reason of that rediculous quota requirement before any person can challenge the top 2 position. Do these 2, the current PM and his DPM really even have the support of the majority of UMNO members -- we do n
ot know - all we know is that there are not enough UMNO DIVISIONS who have the 'guts' to nominate any other person to challenge the post of President and DPM. Dr Mahathir was the last President of UMNO who demonstrated that he had the support of the majority, when he defeated Tengku Razaleigh by a few votes.

It is sad that
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his deputy Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, or the majority of the incumbents in UMNO seem to be NOT really interested in removing that "quota hurdle" that impedes potential challengers... and so like Kings of old, our PM has decided on who will be next PM and when will the "power" be handed over.....It really is so DEMOCRATIC ....nope, that is not the word I was looking for. It was "FEUDAL".

And we wonder whether the UMNO membership will sit by and allow this to happen. After all, what is happening is that they are being denied their right to choose and vote in their next UMNO President, No.2, 3, 4, 5.... But then, it is UMNO members -- we really cannot expect much (or can we???)

What about the Barisan Nasional component party members -- will we be hearing that normal voicing out of support for Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak to be the next PM...and ha
ppiness that the timing of handing over of power has been decided...or have things changed..and MCA, Gerakan, MIC and the other component parties are not going to come out falling head over heels to give that expected endorsement for an agreement made between the PM and his DPM.

I expect that the Media would be carrying reports of all kinds of people expressing great JOY and happiness about this BREAKING NEWS -- (of course, we will never see the views of thos
e who are not happy or read any such comments -- mmmm maybe just a few to give the impression that the media is still 'independent'...)

BUT WAIT, what does the Federal Constitution say about the Prime Minister -- his appointment, etc..and that can be found in Article 43 of the Federal Constitution -- and it says that it is the "...Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall first appoint as Perdana Menteri (Prime Minister) to preside over the Cabinet a member of the House of Representatives who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of that House..." - it is the Yang Di-Pertuan Agung that appoints the PM - not the current PM who decides on the next PM...and here Abdullah is reported stating th
at there was an agreement ---

I do not know -- BUT is this not an action that demonstrates disrespect to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. Is it also not an action (....an agreement) that is in breach of our very own Federal Constitution?

Our highest law of the land, the Federal Constitution, is also clear that the only consideration before appointment by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is that the candidate for PM is "...likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of that House[i.e. the Dewan Rakyat]..."

And here, I wonder whether the Barisan Nasional MPs at least were consulted on this "handing over of premiership" - was there some secret ballot as to whether this Najib Tun Razak has the "confidence of the majority", and in this case today this means that number of MPs sufficient to make up more that 50% of the total number of MPs in Parliament say they did have such confidence and agreed to this "agreement". [I wonder whether such a vote was also taken when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was made PM.] With the happenings after the results of General Elections 2008 came out, especially in Perlis and Trengganu, I also do wonder whether he still do have the "confidence of the majority" -

Even if Abdullah Ahmad Badawi does not have, and If there was going to be a vote. I be
lieve that many may vote because of UMNO...because of Barisan Nasional....but really not because they have confidence in the man, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

The days of FEUDALISM within UMNO, and the Barisan Nasional must come to an END. The windows must be OPENED so that a fresh air of change can enter and bring about change - but will that happen in UMNO...in Barisan Nasional ...maybe not.

Some
say that it will happen in MALAYSIA in the near future, when there is a change of the Federal government, which some claim will happen in or around Malaysia Day.

___________________

43. Cabinet. (Federal Constitution- Art. 43)

(1) The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall appoint a Jemaah Menteri (Cabinet of Ministers) to advise him in the exercise of his functions.

(2) The Cabinet shall be appointed as follows, that is to say:

(a) the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall first appoint as Perdana Menteri (Prime Minister) to preside over the Cabinet a member of the House of Representatives who in his judgment is likely to command the confidence of the majority of the members of that House; and.....


________________



Friday June 13, 2008 MYT 3:05:21 PM

Abdullah, Najib agree on best time for leadership change


KOTA BARU: Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his deputy Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak have reached an agreement on the right time for a leadership change, the Prime Minister said Friday.

Reiterating that he and Najib enjoyed good working relations, Abdullah said they have mutually agreed on the "best time" for a leadership transition.

Abdullah raised the issue as some people were still suspicious of the relationship between him and Najib including Kelantan Umno leaders who raised the matter at the Kelantan Umno liaison committee meeting chaired by the Umno president here on Friday.

"Datuk Seri Najib and I have decided on the right time for me to hand over the premiership to him. We've no problems and we enjoy good working relations.

"The leadership change will definitely take place at the right time," he said at a luncheon with senior government officials and community leaders.

Earlier, Abdullah chaired a two-hour Kelantan Umno meeting. Abdullah is in Kelantan for a one-day visit.

Najib said in London on Thursday that he would not challenge Abdullah for power because as a "true Umno man" he would not risk destroying the party his father had built.

He described himself as a loyal party member who subscribed to an orderly leadership change, as has been the Umno convention.

Abdullah said the people should stop speculating on his relationship with Najib as such talk was of no benefit to anyone.

"It's important for everyone to see the relationship between me and Najib as very crucial to strengthen Umno and the Government and to implement the development projects and programmes that have been planned," he said. The Prime Minister also expressed his gratitude to the support given to him to continue to lead the nation and Umno.

He promised to work hard for the country, party and the people.

"I really value and appreciate the support given to me. If I am accorded solid support, it will spur me to work even harder for the party and the Government," he said. - Bernama

Doctor-Patient Ratio in Malaysia is appaling - We need to seriously look at HEALTHCARE for the masses.

Let us not forget that this is JUST another area in which the government had really slacked. At one time, there was this "policy", it seems to "privatize" health-care - and so the government apparently stopped building government hospitals and promoted private hospitals. Then, they changed their mind and started again building government hospitals.

But then without informing the people, the Government went and signed WTO Agreements including the 'not at all good for Malaysia' TRIPS Agreement - and thereafter the cost of medicines sky-rocketted. Gone were the days when we had them "KK" medicines, whereby KK, I believe, stood for Kementerian Kesihatan. Now the government is bound by "copyright" "trademark" etc and have to get medicines from them BIG powerful medical companies - and hence the cost of medicine sky-rocketed. Now, it is not uncommon to find that in government hospitals, the pharmacy asks patients to just take part of their supply of prescribed medicine and come back in a month for the balance of their medicine.. With the fuel rise, additional burden will be felt by the consumer of government medical care services.

Talking about doctors, the amount of monies expended to train doctors is very high - and medical students in the local government universities only pay a small fraction of this cost. Previously, there has been a condition that just graduated doctors should render their services to the government for certain number of years - maybe that should be revised to a longer term as full-time services, and thereafter part-time services for yet another period.

Now, the government is trying to woo medical practitioners from the private sector ...but "...the Government was offering the private practitioners an allowance of up to RM80 an hour...". I believe that this is rather low, and should be revised. I also believe that there should be consideration as to the number of years of practice, as well as qualifications.

The police, army and the fire depart have a volunteer corp, who do step in from time to time when assistance is needed. Maybe, it is time to also set up a kind of "volunteer medical corp" - which will not just include doctors BUT also other medical staff, and this could be done at the individual hospital levels or town levels -- and I believe that Malaysians who are doctors and medical staff in private practice would HELP and assist where possible. A forming of such a body or association can also help negotiate and iron out the terms of service.

It is of course SHOCKING and most embarrassing to now become aware that the doctor-patient ratio is so far from what it should be in a developed nation. Malaysian government claims that we are on the VERGE of being a developed nation...

"
doctor to patient ratio was 1 to 1,145, when the ratio for developed countries was 1 to 600"

I have already also pointed out in my blogs that we are also in a pathetic state with regard to our courts -- and also our schools:-

Federal Court chief registrar Datuk Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat (as reported in
New Straits Times, 20/9/2006), disclosed that the number of judges in the country was low compared with other Commonwealth nations. He was quoted as saying that the Malaysian ratio is "2.4 judges to a million people - a far cry from the ratio in India (10.5), Australia (57.1), Britain (50.1) and Canada (75)."

Deputy Education Minister Razali Ismail ...said "70 percent of schools in the country already have access to water and electricity...." and that means that 30 percent of schools do not even have access to water and electricity. (Malaysiakini 6/6/2008, 'One-third of schools lack water, power').

Friday June 13, 2008 (Star Online)

Docs shy away from service at govt hospitals

By CHRISTINA KOH and ONG YEE TING

IPOH: The Health Ministry has received dismal response from private doctors after its call for them to volunteer their services at government medical facilities, said minister Datuk Liow Tiong Lai.

Disappointed, Liow said only one doctor from the private sector had come forward since he made the call a month ago, making it just eight since the move was introduced half a year ago.

He doubted that the low take-up rate was because the Government was offering the private practitioners an allowance of up to RM80 an hour.

“When I made the statement a month ago, many private doctors praised the move because they would be able to come forward, not for the money but for the challenge of the job.

“Perhaps many of them don’t know where to sign up for the scheme,” speculated Liow, who urged those interested to do so at the ministry website (www.moh.gov.my).

He said the country was still facing a severe shortage of doctors in government , with only 60% or 13,000 posts filled so far.

This meant that the doctor to patient ratio was 1 to 1,145, when the ratio for developed countries was 1 to 600, said Liow.

In George Town later, Liow said the ministry had appealed to the European Union (EU) for more time to improve the standard and quality of fishery products exported to Europe.

Currently, Malaysia exports about RM1.5bil of fishery products to Europe annually.

Liow said the ministry would hold a dialogue with the exporters on Monday before tabling the issue at the next Cabinet meeting.

He was commenting on a report that the EU might impose a possible ban as seafood products from Malaysia had failed to meet the EU health standards. The EU’s Food and Veterinary Office representatives had visited seafood processing companies and facilities supporting the industry here in April.

In a random check, six out of nine exporters were found to be lagging behind in the health standards and practices set by the EU.

They have been blacklisted, with an immediate effect, from exporting their products to Europe, said Liow, adding the government had also de-listed the six .

“We are committed in doing our part to ensure the exporters abide by the EU regulations,” he told a press conference after attending the presentation of Joint Commission International accreditation for Penang Adventist Hospital here yesterday.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

2.4 judges to a million people - is just NOT ENOUGH... REFORMS please....

Today, we also need look again at the Malaysian Courts, and ask whether it still is the place where all persons can go to seek justice. Is it a place where the poor can battle the rich in search of justice?

One of the tools that was used by those who wanted to prevent the courts from hearing the case on the merits was to raise one of the many preliminary objections on some technical non-compliance, which can get a case struck-off or dismissed without going into the merits of the claim. But this trend seem to have come to an end with judicial pronouncements like in the case of Megat Najmuddin, and then the amendment of the Rules of courts.

But sadly, this practice of striking out suits based on some technical objections still continues on, and today it seems that it may be by reason of the increased amounts of court cases/work that Judges and courts have to deal with, and the pressures from the higher-ups who insist on the clearing of "back-logs".

This is very sad - for people are not fools, and a person who finds his case be struck-off for some technicalities will not at all be satisfied - and hence an appeal, or the filing of yet another suit.....and at the end of the day, it means more cost and expenditure, it means more suits/applications/appeals... and it can also mean "NO JUSTICE".

Nowadays, it is also not uncommon that COST being awarded is EXTREME - In one matter, that I am aware whereby the suit was struck off for some technical non-compliance, the cost awarded for the matters before the Registrar itself comes to over RM200,000-00 - the poor person or company, the Plaintiff, will surely not be able to afford to pay this much and as a result we may be looking at a phenomena that if you take a matter to court against certain persons/companies - not only will your matter be struck-off BUT you may also end up being made a bankrupt and/or wound-up --- and the VICTIM who went to court for JUSTICE will be just further victimized and the GUILTY will escape scott-free. There is a need to formulate a policy for absolute minimum cost awards, and also a policy that should let matters be litigated on the merits completely before there be any cost taxed and/or paid out generally. REMEMBER access to justice must be for ALL - both the rich and the poor. After all, access to them alternate dispute resolution means like Arbitration and/or Mediation is too expensive and is not accessible to the POOR.

Cases filed should MOVE smoothly and should end soonest - and by end we mean that the dispute must be heard on the MERITS by a competent independent and fair Judge, and things like cost, etc should be done away with or kept to the bare minimum - i.e. no more than the cost of them filing fees, etc.. Whoever wins, will be awarded DAMAGES or COMPENSATION and that will be a fair sum - not that COST.

NOT ENOUGH COURTS AND JUDGES

The main problem then and today is still the fact that we really do not have enough courts and judges -

Federal Court chief registrar Datuk Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat (as reported in New Straits Times, 20/9/2006), disclosed that the number of judges in the country was low compared with other Commonwealth nations. He was quoted as saying that the Malaysian ratio is "2.4 judges to a million people - a far cry from the ratio in India (10.5), Australia (57.1), Britain (50.1) and Canada (75)."

The number of lawyers have increased, the literacy and legal literacy of the Malaysian people have increased... and as such clearly there will be more and more cases being filed in courts.

Now, there are rules that stipulate where you file a case -- and one of it is that it must be filed where the Defendant has its address, or where the crime /facts concerning the case occurred, etc..

Now, in Selangor we have 3 High Courts (for civil, commercial, family, probate. land, appellate and special powers, bankruptcy, etc) and 17 High Courts in KL(Appellate & Special Powers Division of the KL High Court - 2, Commercial Division Of The KL High Court - 7,
Civil Division Of The KL High Court - 8). There is a definite shortage of High Courts in Selangor - Shah Alam. In other states, the number of High Courts are even lower, i.e. 1 or 2 - and these High Courts also have to deal with Criminal Matters. The problem is not "back-log" - the problem is clearly the shortage of courts and judges.

GET RID OF THAT PROBATIONARY JUDGE - THE JUDICIAL COMMISSIONER

There really is no need to nowadays use threats, etc to get the kind of Judges the PM and his government wants - for after all we now have that new "Probationary Judge ", them Judicial Commissioners who will not be made JUDGE unless the PM and/or the Government is satisfied.

GET RID OF THE PRACTICE THAT REGISTRARS CAN STRIKE OUT CASES OR GIVE JUDGMENTS IN HIGH COURT MATTERS

These Registrars (Deputy Registrars and Senior Assistant Registrars), who now sit in the High Court hearing applications which may lead to a case being struck-off, or even judgment entered into are an affront to Justice. Them Registrars are from the Judicial and Legal Service Commission - "under the Attorney General", and yesterday a Public Prosecutor tomorrow a lower court Judge or a Registrar.

Some of them are so young, new graduates with hardly a few months in practice and they decide to strike off High Court cases, or give judgment - and this is very wrong --- Certain cases can only be heard by the High Court, and here we have persons who should not even be Magistrates or Sessions Court Judges making "final" decisions....

WE NEED SERIOUS REFORMS -- WE NEED TO REMIND OURSELVES THE FUNCTIONS OF COURT - WE NEED TO ENSURE THAT EVERYONE, INCLUDING THE POOR SHOULD HAVE FULL ACCESS TO THE COURTS - WE NEED TO GET RID OF PRACTICES, ETC... THAT DISCOURAGE USAGE OF THE COURTS OR SHUTS PERSONS OFF FROM JUSTICE....

HENCE, the need for a ROYAL COMMISSION FOR THE REFORM OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY.










Wednesday, June 11, 2008

ROYAL COMMISSION FOR THE REFORM OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY.....

"...God has given me the strength and fortitude, as a lesser mortal, to act without fear or favour, for fear of a breach of oath of office and sacrifice justice, and above all to truly act as a judge and not a “yes-man” - Muhammad Kamil Awang J

Well, that Muhammad Kamil Awang J did get it right for that is how a judge is to behave....

Below is the response of the Bar Council, Dr Mahathir (our former premier)...and the response of our current government in the form of the de-facto Minister of Law who said that there will be no investigation into the matters revealed by Ian Chin because it will be a waste of money.... (is that indicative of really how our current PM and the government view the judiciary....mmmm)

In any event, the question is WHO should be doing the PROBING or the INVESTIGATING? In a Democracy, there are three independent pillars, i.e. the Executive (being the PM and his Cabinet), the Legislative (being Parliament - the Dewan Rakyat, the Dewan Negara,...) and the Judiciary. Should the executive be deciding? I think not .... maybe it should be the KING - a Royal Commission...or maybe the Judiciary.

Will the police or maybe the ACA start an investigation --- or are they going to be waiting to get orders from the Attorney General ....who is waiting for the "go-ahead" from the current Prime Minister...

What we need now is the setting up of ROYAL COMMISSION FOR THE REFORM OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY....(which is very different from the Judicial Appointments Commission who is concerned with the choosing, appointment, elevation of Judges...who according to our PM will only be advising him anyway - and he (the PM) will not be bound to follow that advise. Now if the PM advise, then the King must follow....odd is it not)
who will also look at

So, yes, we do need a ROYAL COMMISSION FOR THE REFORM OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY - and that is not for the narrow purpose of looking at the allegations made by Ian Chin (or some other Judge some time ago...) BUT to really look at the Judiciary and propose some serious reforms....certain questions need to be answered.....

a) If a person has a complain about a Judge or the court, to whom would he make it? Who will be responsible for investigating and acting on that complaint?

b) If a Judge has some complaint, like that of Ian Chin..., where would they go to...? They cannot go to their heads in the Judiciary ...since it may just be about these heads that the complaint is all about. After all that directive to Muhammad Kamil Awang J came from his superiors. In the case of Ian Chin, the complaint is about the PM, the DPM and the government(i.e. the executive)...so who should be dealing with this kind of matters.

c) A Judicial Ombudsman - appointed by the yang Di-Pertuan Agung reporting back to the Parliament (mmmm but that provision about that reporting back to parliament really do not work as we see that despite a statutory provision is there with regard to SUHAKAM's reports - to date I believe, Parliament has yet to discuss, let alone, debate that SUHAKAM reports, its reccomendation.

d) Should Judges be elected?

e) Separation of the Judicial and Legal Services Commissions...

-- BUT then some may say, do we need to waste time now with yet another ROYAL COMMISSION when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi is PM (and BN is government) - for after all the 2 Royal Commissions' proposal on the POLICE (IPCMC) , which Abdullah assured us he would implement, is still far from being a reality. Mind you the Royal Commission did even prepare a Draft Bill - all you needed to do was put it before Parliament and it would have become law and we would have had that IPCMC for the Police.....

I say - better have that ROYAL COMMISSION FOR THE REFORM OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY now - so even if Badawi-led government does not implement the recommendations maybe the next government would.

I would say no to setting up small little Inquiry Panels and Commissions of Inquiry for that Lingam Tape matter, now the Ian Chin Disclosures - BOOT CAMP and all, some other matter or scandal tommorrow - better just have ONE big ROYAL COMMISSION FOR THE REFORM OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY

Considering the state of our Malaysian Judiciary today, I believe that maybe the Malaysia should adhere to the recently passed UN General Assembly resolution calling for an immediate moratorium of the death penalty... A person should not be executed by the State based on the judgment of some possibly BAD Judge or Judges, should he, now?



Press Statement: Bar Council’s immediate response to the Report in the Borneo Post dated 10 June 2008



Contributed by Ambiga Sreenevasan
Tuesday, 10 June 2008 10:51pm

Ambiga SreenevasanThe disclosures made today by High Court Judge Ian Chin J are both startling and damning. They speak to forms of executive and other interference in the judiciary which have undermined the institution. Judges must make known and if necessary make public any such acts of interference by any party.

One of the more significant disclosures made by the Judge is that he was informed by another High Court Judge Muhammad Kamil Awang J (as he then was), that he had received a telephone call from the then Chief Justice asking the latter to dismiss an election petition that was heard in 2001 in relation to the Likas constituency elections in March 1999. This corroborates the similar disclosure made by Muhammad Kamil Awang J himself in his judgment on that election petition namely in the case of Harris Mohd Salleh v The Returning Officer, Ismail Majin & Ors [2001] 3 CLJ 161. In that case, the Judge said:

“The only guide to a man is his conscience, the only shield to his memory is the rectitude and the sincerity of his action. In my view, it is an insult to one’s intelligence to be given a directive over the phone that these petitions should be stuck off without a hearing, and above all, it is with prescience conscience that I heard these petitions. God has given me the strength and fortitude, as a lesser mortal, to act without fear or favour, for fear of a breach of oath of office and sacrifice justice, and above all to truly act as a judge and not a “yes-man”.”

Another disclosure by Ian Chin J about the conduct of a “boot camp” for judges and judicial officers was equally shocking and should be investigated.

These allegations and all the other disclosures made by Ian Chin J must of course be comprehensively looked into, not only by the Chief Justice but by all other relevant authorities. Judges, both present and past, must be encouraged to come forward and provide information of any such instances of interference so that further action may be taken.

Ambiga Sreenevasan
President
Bar Council


Dr Mahathir's response as found in his blog, Che Det:-


Dr M threatened judges


Both the New Straits Times and the Star today chose to splash Justice Dato Ian Chin’s “stunning” claims of my alleged interference in the judiciary, providing brief respite from the current issues of oil price hike etc etc

I will refrain from commenting for now and will do so in due time.

However, I am quite curious about what Ian Chin considers as “veiled threat”. Perhaps he could be more specific as his allegations are very serious.

And in Malaysiakini, it was reported that "....De facto law minister Zaid Ibrahim today ruled out a probe into
MCPX
claims
by Sabah and Sarawak High Court judge Ian Chin on executive intervention into the judiciary some 10 years ago...." (Zaid: No probe on judge's expose)

JUDGES should NEVER be affected by threats and promises...

Now our Judges must be brave and must perform their duties as JUDGES without fear or favour taking into consideration only the need to do Justice. They must not be affected by threats, promises and/or anything else. We have seen many junior Judges elevated to higher courts speedily - and there has been wonder whether this was the way the government of the day (through the Prime Minister) was paying them back for the services that they rendered by making a judgment in the way the government wanted it in some selected cases.

There are safeguards that have been placed to ensure the "independence" of Judges - and this includes the security of tenure (i.e. until their retirement age, with an extremely difficult "earlier temination" process which is rarely used - the last time it was used was in during the 1988 Judicial Crisis.), that Consolidated Fund which guarantees that salaries/allowances due to Judges are paid in time (irrespective even if government coffers are empty or drying up)....

Now, I believe that if a Judge feels that some persons are doing things to undermine the independence of the Judiciary -- then he is duty bound to do something about it and make it known immediately - not so many years later. But then, maybe these threats, requests, promises and gifts may be happening every now and then, so much so a Judge is already "immune" to these corrupting diseases and is strong enough to be not affected by them - he may just ignore it. I wouldn't be surprised if all Judges may have been approached with threats or goodies to decide on some cases this way and that way at least once during their career on the bench - BUT have been strong to REPEL this advances and continue on doing the job as Judges. I feel that today, it must be compulsory that Judges report immediately of any such attempt or even perceived attempt to some body who could investigate it, and take action against those that try to undermine our judiciary.

The Prime Minister and the Government may express that they want judges to toe the line, and he did do so very openly. Dr Mahathir was reported in the 24 November 1986 issue of Time magazine, as saying:O“The Judiciary says, ‘Although you passed a law with certain thing in mind, we think that your mind is wrong , and we want to give our intepretation.’ If we disagree, the courts say, ‘We will intepret your disagreement.’ If we go along, we are going to lose our power of legislation. We know exactly what we want to do, but once we do it, it is intepreted in a different way, and we have no means to intepret it our way. If we find that a court always throws us out on its own intepretation, if it inteprets contrary to why we made the law, then we will have to find a way of producing a law that will have to be interpreted according to our wish.”

O
f course, Dr Mahathir did also in a speech made at the opening ceremony of the Asean Law Association General Assembly on 26 October 1982, he had this to say about the Malaysian Judiciary:- “I will always respect the Judiciary. We do not expect the courts to be pro or anti Government, only pro the Constitution and pro the law. The Government always considers the Constitution and the law carefully before we do anything so we expect the Judiciary to be free to judge our alleged trespasses without fear or favour, but in accordance with the law, in accordance with the law of evidence and procedure justly and fairly. We shall always respect their judgments...”

Although, many would say that it was not proper for the Prime Minister (and/or the government) to say such things OR express such wishes/hopes OR make such threats, at the end of the day, the ball really, is in the individual Judge's court - what do you do, My Judge?

Honourable Judge, do not come back many years later, and say that I made such a judgment because there was a threat or some directive or some "orders from above" - that is not acceptable.

You are a Judge appointed by the King, and you only have to do your duty as Judge - and if you cannot do that, then you have no other choice BUT to resign.

Being asked to go to a "boot-camp", you have the choice to refuse to go ..... or even to leave when you find out that something is not right.

Being asked to go for a "holiday" or a "party" --- you have the choice to say NO - as it is conduct that may bring about a perception that the judiciary (or me, the Judge) is biased and no more independent.

A judge's independence cannot be affected by any other person - be he the King, the Prime Minister, the Chief Judge, the Lord President, the president of MIC, some Lingam lawyer, etc-- and Judges should KNOW this.

At the same time, it is NOT wrong to attend some meeting or conference or boot camp and have some person there say that Judges must be pro-Government, or anti- government, pro-environment or anti-environment, pro-Israel or anti-Israel, pro-Islam or anti-Islam --- There is nothing wrong with listening, getting inputs on various positions, etc..... But at the end of the day, when sitting as a Judge, the only consideration is that justice be done......FULL STOP.

Pro-government and government policies "brain-washing" continuously happens through the media, amongst others, in any country, and as such it is important that Judges also do expose themselves to opposing and other viewpoints on a particular subject matter. This exposure is essential -- and it will make a Judge more holistic and better equipped to be a Judge. Judges should not just be influenced by earlier judgments of their peers, or higher courts in this Jurisdiction or that jurisdiction - BUT should also be influenced by other thoughts and viewpoints.

At the end of the day, I say CONGRATS to Ian Chin for highlighting this matters - which would have been better if it had been highlighted before. To be fair, the matter about that DIRECTIVE from the chief judge was highlighted so much earlier - is that Judge still around?

Now, let us not again start focussing too much on the happenings in the past, the former Prime Minister, that former Chief Judge -- we have to look at TODAY, and do the needful to ensure that things are right from now onwards...

Our government and the Prime Minister would really love to re-focus our attention on his predecessor -- who now today is a serious critic of the current Prime Minister.


2008/06/11



'Dr M threatened judges...'
Judge's stunning allegation in court
Datuk Ian Chin.
Datuk Ian Chin.

SIBU: A High Court judge here has alleged that Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad threatened to punish the judiciary in 1997 for decisions he disliked.


Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
Justice Datuk Ian Chin, 60, is the most senior of the 48 High Court judges in the country.

He made the stunning allegation at the start of proceedings on Monday when hearing an election petition filed by Wong Hus She, the defeated DAP candidate for the Sarikei parliamentary seat, the Borneo Post reported.

Anticipating a motion for his recusal, Chin took the "step to disclose what the parties and counsel may not be aware of but which they may later complain that I should have disclosed".

Wong lost the Sarikei seat to Barisan Nasional's Ding Kuong Hing by 51 votes.
Both sides did not object to Chin as the presiding judge, the Borneo Post reported.

He referred to two cases he had presided over in February 1997 - a libel suit and an election petition - the decisions with which the then prime minister was apparently displeased, he said.

He said Dr Mahathir had gone to the judges' conference about a month later "to issue a thinly veiled threat to remove judges by referring to the tribunal that was set up before".

From May 26 until 30, he was "packed off to boot camp" for lessons on taking the government line in judicial decisions.

Last month, the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Lingam video clip castigated Dr Mahathir for going against the Constitution in appointing judges and called for an investigation into Dr Mahathir.

According to the notes of proceedings made available to the New Straits Times, Chin said in the libel suit: "I distinguished M.G.G. Pillai v Tan Sri Datuk Vincent Tan Chee Yioun & Other Appeals (1995) 2 MLJ 493 and refused to give what I consider to be an astronomical award for damage to reputation in libel cases".

In the election petition, he had set aside the victory of BN's Mong Dagang in the 1996 state polls in the Bukit Begunan seat.

Chin said Dr Mahathir had "expressed unhappiness" over the decision.

"After he was done with issuing that threat, he then proceeded to express his view that people should pay heavily for libel.

"He managed to get a single response from a Court of Appeal judge who asked whether he would be happy with a sum of RM1 million as damages for libel.

"He approved of it and he later on made known his satisfaction by promoting this judge (since deceased) to the Federal Court over many others who were senior to him when a vacancy arose."

Chin said he was "devastated" by what went on but was consoled by fellow judges who remarked "the prime minister was too much".

"It will be recalled that the prime minister not long after he assumed office had said, in a much publicised campaign against corruption, that he will put the fear of God in man but this apparently, given his diatribe in that conference, changed to instilling a fear of him if any judgment is to his dislike."

He said the "boot camp" he attended with selected judges and judicial officers was "an attempt to indoctrinate those attending to hold the view that the government's interest" was "more important than all else when we are considering our judgments".

"Stating this devilish notion was no less a person than the president of the Court of Appeal," he said.

"The perversion of justice did not stop there. My brother judge (Datuk Muhammad) Kamil Awang was one morning looking for me after clocking in. We were both then serving in Kuching.

"When I met him in his chambers, he was distraught and he told me about receiving a telephone call the night before from the chief justice asking him to dismiss the election petition that he was going to hear in Kota Kinabalu.

"He sought my opinion as to what to do about the telephone call.

"We went into the possibility of making a police report or of writing to the chief justice a letter to record what he had said over the telephone but in the end, he decided against it since it would be his word against that of the chief justice," Chin said.

"I was happy to learn later on that he did not bow to the pressure by the chief justice and went on to hear the petition and thereafter, making a decision based on the law and evidence."

Chin also declared that he had twice stood unsuccessfully for election as a BN candidate in the 1980s, in one of which he lost to the DAP. He had also heard other election petitions.

"Now, though no longer the prime minister and so no longer able to carry out his threat to remove judges which should, therefore, dispel any fear which any judge may have of him, if ever there was such fear, nevertheless the coalition party that he led is still around and the second respondent won on a ticket of that coalition party and it may cross someone's mind that I may have an axe to grind against the party concerned or any member thereof.

"The petitioner in this case may also have a similar view with regard to my defeat by a candidate standing on the ticket of the party to which he belongs.

"So I wish to hear from the parties as to whether they entertain any such notion and whether they wish to apply for my recusal so that, if any, I can make a decision thereon.

"After this disclosure, litigants who were affected by the hundreds of judgments that I handed down since those infamous days may justifiably worry as to whether any of my judgments were in any way influenced by this attempt to hang the Sword of Damocles over my head.

"No amount of words from me would assuage you of your worry; you will have to read my judgments as to whether they are according to the evidence and the law or whether they were influenced by threat."

Chin then adjourned for half an hour to let the parties consider an application for his recusal.

None, however, was made.

Datuk Ian Chin was appointed judicial commissioner on Feb 26, 1992 and since then has served in the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. He is, at present, a resident judge at the High Court in Kota Kinabalu.



No comment from Dr M

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad will not respond to the allegations made by a High Court judge anytime soon.

In a SMS sent to the New Straits Times, Dr Mahathir's aide, Sufi Yusoff, said the former prime minister would respond 'in due time, if at all' to the allegations by Datuk Ian Chin yesterday.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

RETIREES and the OLD -- how will they survive the increased COST of LIVING

It is already starting to happen.....cost of living is going up....and all because of the increase of fuel prices. (But let us also not forget that we are also facing a "Global Food Crisis" - which is also going to cause the increase of food prices. Now, increase of oil prices is one of many factors that brings about this "Global Food Crisis")

I am very concerned for all those persons who have RETIRED -- who did put aside some money for their old age.

The government, of late, have been talking about PENSIONERS - and these are those who were previously in government service who are receiving monthly pensions (which will be paid until they die, and thereafter until their spouse passes on ....). Here, the government can increase the monthly pensions to cope with the increased cost of living.

BUT what about those who are under the EPF(KWSP) - they would have taken what they had when they retired - and there is no continuous monthly payments until they pass on. Them pensioners, it is said is less than 1/2 million - the rest fall under the EPF or do not have such "Savings for their Old Age" since they may have been self employed.

How much really do you get from EPF when you retire -- One chief clerk in a government service received RM70,000-00, and how long would that have survived. 6 years (maybe 7 years) - after that what happens..

Now, after the rising the cost of fuel...electricity rates, etc - the government's attention is seem to be in giving relief to owners of vehicles - what really is the plan to deal with all the others that will be suffering the consequence of these price-hikes - the increased cost of living.

The Prime Minister is talking about restricting holidays of his Ministers (and their families) to ASEAN - I say NO MORE such holidays and perks. They too should just be paid their salary as Ministers, and that is it. After all, they also get their salary as MPs and Senators (and the other allowances). There is no justification for the Malaysian people to be paying Ministers/Deputy Ministers and their families to go for annual holidays, and for their entertainment.... What is this "entertainment allowance" which, for example the PM gets about RM18,865 monthly (DPM, Ministers and Deputy Ministers all get them). If it is in the carrying out of their duties, then the government will pay for it - there is no necessity for such "entertainment allowances".

The PM, his deputy and his Ministers really seem to be taking home SO MUCH and that is why they do not feel the effect of the hike in fuel prices ---- and the cost of living.

We have to really look into the plight of the RETIREES - the old as well.



Monday June 9, 2008


Prices to go up 10% next month

IPOH: Consumers can expect the prices of many essential items to increase by as much as 10% next month.

Federation of Sundry Goods Merchant Associations of Malaysia president Lean Hing Chuan said sundry store owners have no choice but to raise the prices of goods not controlled by ceiling prices to survive the impact of the fuel price hike.

Lean said canned food and other items with plastic packaging were likely to be sold at a higher price but declined to disclose the actual list of goods.

“Goods transported long distance by lorries are also expected to increase by at least 10%,” he said yesterday after the 87th anniversary luncheon of the Perak Sundry Shops Guild.

Earlier in his speech, Lean urged the Government to open up more vacant land for cultivation and start measures for rice-producing states like Kedah to improve rice production per hectare.

He also expressed doubt about the effectiveness of the government’s move to place colour stickers on rice sacks enabling consumers to differentiate between price-controlled rice and imported rice.

Perak Sundry Shops Guild chairman Lee Kim Seng urged the state government to set up an air-conditioned “retailing centre” for shop owners to set up their business.

He suggested the lots be rented out cheaply to business owners of all races.

“It will be a place where you can find Chinese medicine, pharmacies, hardware, clothes, shoes and other goods all in one place,” he said.

Perak Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry president Datuk Lim Kok Cheong reminded members that inflation may be inevitable but it was no reason to close down their businesses

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Reduce fuel prices - lower production cost - ATTRACTS foreign investor - good for Malysian company and MALAYSIANS

What if.....Malaysia, an oil-producing country did not raise fuel prices, electricity rates, etc...

What if, in fact, the Malaysian government increased subsidies and really reduced the cost of fuel in Malaysia - which would also bring about reduction in the electricity rates, transport costs, cost of food and all other materials generally.... would that NOT make Malaysia VERY ATTRACTIVE to the the Foreign Investor - who would want to bring and set-up his factory here and this will provide more employment for Malaysians and more MONEY for the nation.


The LOW production cost would also be very beneficial for the LOCAL companies as they would be able to market their products at much lower prices and hence grab a bigger share of both the local and the global market.

After all, Malaysia have been using CHEAP LABOUR, TAX HOLIDAYS, etc to lobby the foreign investor to COME to Malaysia ....or to continue to stay put in the country.

Now with the rise of fuel prices globally, and given Malaysia's advantage of being an OIL & GAS producer, should Malaysia not take advantage of the situation --Rather that torturing its own people by rising prices of fuel, electricity rates,....and generally the COST of LIVING....

Cheap Fuel, Cheap Electricity, Very Low Tolls or NO Toll, Cheap Food --- this would be good for the Malaysian people, for the Local companies, for the Foreign companies that will come --- we cannot lose..