Monday, June 30, 2025

Edisi Siasat blocked by court order: Lawyer insists Comms Minister spell out crimes of whistleblower site

Edisi Siasat blocked by court order: Lawyer insists Comms Minister spell out crimes of whistleblower site


IN George Orwell’s satire, Animal Farm, one tyrannical regime is toppled by a popular revolt, only for it to be replaced by one that is infinitely worse.

This was seemingly the point that lawyer and human rights activist Charles Hector was making with regard to whistleblowers.

He was referring to the action taken against whistleblower sites – Edisi Siasat – whose Telegram channel has been blocked and can no longer be viewed by its 1.18 million followers.

Editor’s Note: Apart from Edisi Siasat, another well-known Telegram channel, Edisi Khas, is also facing similar wrath from the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) for allegedly spreading content that could harm public order and erode trust in national institutions.

Hector very pointedly asked what laws did this site break?

The anti-death penalty proponent demanded that Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil and the MCMC to immediately inform Malaysians as to what is happening in detail. This is to avoid confusion.

The legal eagle outlined several pertinent queries:

“What was the alleged crime committed by Edisi Siasat? What post? How was it harmful? Was it fake? Which law exactly did it violate?” he enquired, wondering if it fell afoul of the broadly worded Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 which many citizens have called to be repealed.

Hector further drew comparisons of Edisi Siasat with that of the restrictions placed on Sarawak Report by Datuk Seri Najib’s administration. The latter website had been instrumental in revealing damning details on the 1MDB scandal and drawing public attention to it.

In 2015, the Sarawak Report was blocked in Malaysia with authorities having issued an arrest warrant for its editor/founder Clare Rewcastle Brown for “threatening parliamentary democracy.”

Pre-0emptive measure

With a number of cases against officials from the previous administration on-going, perhaps there is a fear among Madani officials that they, too. would be subject to such scrutiny should Pakatan Harapan (PH) fall at the next elections.

Hence, they are safeguarding themselves by taking the necessary pre-emptive measures, according to the outspoken lawyer. This includes the dubious blocking of sites and abuse of authority.

Charles Hector

“Remember that public officers are responsible to Malaysians and not just the current PM and government,” he reminded civil servants of their duty.

“The fact that (past) PMs and ministers do commit crime and sometimes abuse their power is already clear. Even now, there are pending investigations and on-going trials against past government PMs, ministers, etc.

“After GE16 –if and when PMX Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s’s Madani government is ousted – it is possible we will see cases being commenced against ministers of this current government.” – June 20, 2025, Focus Malaysia

Thursday, June 26, 2025

Statement (World Drug Day) – 26/6/2025 Abolish Life Imprisonment and Death Penalty for DRUG offences. Also abolish WHIPPING

 

Media Statement (World Drug Day) – 26/6/2025

Abolish Life Imprisonment and Death Penalty for DRUG offences

On the occasion of the World Drug Day (26th June), MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) applauds Malaysia for the elimination of the mandatory death penalty for the offence of drug trafficking, which now finally allows judges, after convicting a person of the offence of drug trafficking, do have the option to sentence persons convicted of drug trafficking offence to life imprisonment and whipping, other than death. This was made possible after the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023.

An Oversight Which Still Provides for Life Imprisonment for Drug Trafficking Should Be Speedily Dealt With

However, there was an oversight, when the alternative imprisonment sentence for drug trafficking remains the life imprisonment, when MADPET believed that ‘life imprisonment’ should have been amended to 30 to 40 years imprisonment, which MADPET hope Malaysia should speedily do the needed amendment. This is inconsistent, as all other previously mandatory capital offence, now carry an alternative sentence of imprisonment – not the life imprisonment, which was also abolished with the mandatory death penalty.

Section 39B(2) still today reads ‘(2) Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence against this Act and shall be punished on conviction with death or imprisonment for life and shall, if he is not sentenced to death, be punished with whipping of not less than twelve strokes.’

Until that ‘imprisonment for life’ for drug trafficking is speedily amended to a range like 30 to 40 years imprisonment, Courts will have a problem when they chose the alternative to death sentence, they still have to sentence convicted drug traffickers to ‘imprisonment for life’.

Now, some courts have been since sentencing drug traffickers to 30 to 40 years imprisonment, and not imprisonment for life, which is JUST but still could be seen as illegal when this Drug law specifically provides the alternative punishment of ‘imprisonment for life’ for the crime of drug trafficking.

MADPET believes that the offence of drug trafficking ought to broken up to provide for different types of drug trafficking offences with different sentences. ‘Mules’ arrested with drugs in their possession should be subjected to much lesser sentences, compared to kingpins or bosses, that manufacture, sell, or arrange distribution networks. Rather that fixing the minimum imprisonment term at 30 years, it may be just to set it at no more than 5 years, or simply not fixing any minimum term of imprisonment, and leaving it to judges to determine the appropriate just sentence for each particular case.

DRUG OFFENCES and Death Row

In November 2023 in Malaysia, on death row, there were 840 for drug offences, and 435 for other offences – about 65% because of drug offence – drug trafficking.  Now, in January 2025, only 40 are on death row for drug offences, and another 100 for other offences – about 28% on death row for drug offences (Malay Mail, 5/4/2025)

This happened not only because of the Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, but more importantly the Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction Of The Federal Court) Act 2023 that allowed the Federal Court temporary special jurisdiction to consider the application of death row inmates, who had already exhausted all appeals, to review their death sentence.

“… 814 individuals were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment through hearings under the Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Review (Temporary Jurisdiction of the Federal Court) Act 2023 [Act 847], which came into effect on September 12, 2023,” she[Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said] said in a parliamentary written reply to Bukit Gelugor MP Ramkarpal Singh Deo.[Malay Mail, 6/11/2024]

After the Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023, courts hearing appeals could also change death sentences in appropriate cases to the imprisonment sentence. The Minister also said “Of that number, 52 were prisoners at the appeal stage who were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment….’ .[Malay Mail, 6/11/2024]

Likewise, now courts hearing drug trafficking case could now avail themselves to the alternative to death sentences if the accused had been found guilty.

Despite The Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty, Persons Still Being Sentenced To Death..

Although Malaysia abolished the MANDATORY death penalty, the death penalty still exists in all these offences. The only difference, is that now, upon conviction, judges have the option of sentencing to death, OR imposing the alternative imprisonment plus whipping sentence.

The problem is that some Judges/Courts, despite the abolition of mandatory death penalty, still continues to impose the death penalty, both after trial at the court of first instance, or the appeals following.

In November 2024, the Minister acknowledged this. ‘Azalina noted that 18 individuals received new death sentences — 12 from the High Court and six from the Court of Appeal.’ [Malay Mail, 6/11/2024]

This means that there will still be death row prisoners, and the numbers will rise in time – and there is NO possible way on how to deal with this existing and new death row prisoners.

Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction Of The Federal Court) Act 2023 only gave TEMPORARY powers to the Federal Court, and effectively now is a ‘DEAD Act’ – as persons in death row cannot anymore apply for a revision of their death penalty.

In Indonesia, at the end of 2022, their revised Criminal Code introduced an automatic 10-year probation for convicts on death row to demonstrate good behavior for the possibility of having their sentences commuted. This law will take effect on January 2, 2026.

MADPET urges Malaysia to revive the Federal Court’s jurisdiction to be able to revise death penalty of those on death row, who have already exhausted their appeals. Those on death row ought to be allowed to make applications, maybe once every 2 years or when circumstances warrant such an application.

MADPET also reiterates for the abolition of the death penalty, noting Malaysia’s commitment to the world at large to have a moratorium on execution pending abolition of the death penalty. Malaysia voted in favor of the UN General Assembly Resolution in 2018, 2020, 2022 and 2024 which is also Malaysia’s commitment to abolish the death penalty.

No Public Outcry Indicates Malaysia’s Readiness For Total Abolition Of Death Penalty

There was no public outcry when the mandatory death penalty was abolished. Likewise, there was no outcry when dead sentence was commuted to imprisonment plus whipping, and as such it is a positive indicator that Malaysia and Malaysians are ready for the abolition of the death penalty.

A possible next step is the abolition of death penalty for offences that does not directly result in death or grievous bodily harm to any victim/s.

Drug offences are one such category of offences, where death penalty ought to be abolished.

Statutory Denial of Bail Must be Abolished – Let Courts decide on Bail

Section 41B(1) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952[DDA] now states that ‘Bail shall not be granted to an accused person charged with an offence under this Act – (a) where the offence is punishable with death; or….’. The 39B Drug Trafficking offence carries the sentence of death OR life imprisonment, and as such BAIL, by law, cannot be granted.

Yusoff Rawther, and 7 others in 3 different cases, from February this year, who had languish in detention for months, and the worst for more than 5 years because of this denial of bail, ended up being found not guilty and acquitted (NST, 6/3/2025) (The Star, 14/3/2025) (NST, 12/2/2025). This were only the media reported cases, and so there can be more.

It is a gross miscarriage of justice for these innocent persons to have suffered prolonged pre-conviction detention because the Statute, not judges, denied them bail. MADPET reiterates the call for the repeal of statutory provisions that deny bail, and ask that judges be restored that Judges be restored the jurisdiction to hear and decide on all bail applications.

DNAA If Trial Cannot Speedily Begin and End

What is of great concern is the delay of commencement and ending of criminal trials, more so for those who have to suffer pre-conviction detention in Malaysia’s already overcrowded prisons. Recently, in former Prime Minister Najib’s trial, where there was delay in starting and ending trial, the courts DISCHARGED Najib – a Discharge Not Amounting To Acquittal (DNAA).

MADPET asks for similar DNAA for all pre-conviction or remand prisoners, be it for drug offences of other offences, to ensure Malaysia’s Constitutional guarantee under Article 8(1) ‘All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.’

If trial cannot start within 3 months, they should all be DISCHARGED, and this will not be prejudicial to State who can at anytime re-charge them when prosecution is ready to start and end trial speedily. Justice Delayed is Justice Denied also applies to the presumed innocent accused persons, especially those subjected to pre-conviction or remand detention.

MADPET also reiterates for the abolition of whipping, more so since the recent case where a person died after being whipped.

In dealing with the DRUG problem, it seems obvious that death penalty or heavy penalties have not solved the problem of drug use and abuse. Thus, States should look at real causes of addiction, mostly done voluntarily, and deal with it in more effective ways like education.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

Two years after abolishing the mandatory death penalty, data shows Malaysia may be moving on for good

Data presented in Parliament during the February-March sitting showed a sharp increase in commutations of existing death sentences in the six months after Putrajaya repealed the mandatory death penalty, as death row inmates filed appeals for resentencing and judges granted them. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa
Data presented in Parliament during the February-March sitting showed a sharp increase in commutations of existing death sentences in the six months after Putrajaya repealed the mandatory death penalty, as death row inmates filed appeals for resentencing and judges granted them. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

KUALA LUMPUR, April 5 — Within two years year of the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim administration abolishing the mandatory death penalty, the number of death row inmates has plunged by nearly 90 per cent, the clearest sign yet that Malaysia is moving away from capital punishment — even as it remains legal.

Data presented in Parliament during the February-March sitting this year showed a sharp increase in commutations of existing death sentences in the six months after Putrajaya repealed the mandatory death penalty.

This comes as death row inmates filed appeals for resentencing and judges granted them.

Most sentences were commuted to prison terms of between 20 and 40 years, with the latter often reserved for serious crimes such as murder.
Flourish logoA Flourish chart

Rapid speed in resentencing

In January 2024, there were 1,275 death row inmates, with 936 awaiting their resentencing applications. By January 1 this year, the total number of death row inmates had dropped to just 140 — a staggering 87 per cent decline.

The data reflects the speed at which judges commuted these sentences, slashing resentencing cases by over half by July 2024 before clearing most of them as the year progressed.

Just 50 death sentences were retained

A total of 860 death sentences were commuted within 12 months, with just 50 retained. Meanwhile, courts struck out 22 applications on administrative grounds, barring them from reapplying.

Four inmates, however, died in prison before their resentencing applications could be approved.

Some drug offenders remained on death row

While the data shows judges largely retained death sentences for murder cases, dozens of drug offenders were not spared.

Still, the number of death row inmates convicted for drug trafficking dropped significantly by January 1 this year, from 840 a year earlier to just 40 — the highest rate of commutations among all offences.

In contrast, death sentences for homicide had the highest rate of retention. On January 1, 2024, there were 435 death row inmates convicted of murder, with 335 of them having their sentences commuted 12 months later.

A total of 100 death sentences were retained.

By gender, male death row inmates had the highest rate of sentence retention, at 137. Only three of the remaining death row inmates are women.

Progress made, but gaps remain

Anti-capital punishment groups such as Hayat, which works with families of death row inmates, said the data signals progress but also highlights gaps.

For instance, the absence of written judgments for resentencing cases was a missed opportunity to provide guidance for fair and just sentencing discretion, the group said.

There is also ambiguity around resentencing for juvenile offenders and those with mental health conditions. Laws governing sentencing for these groups still allow for indefinite imprisonment and the death penalty.

Another issue is whipping, which was not repealed despite the move to abolish the mandatory death penalty. Human rights groups have described whipping as inhumane. - Malay Mail, 5/4/2025

Over 800 death row sentences commuted to imprisonment under new Act, says Azalina

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said 866 individuals received reduced sentences from the Federal Court between Jan 1 and Oct 14, 2024. — Bernama pic
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said 866 individuals received reduced sentences from the Federal Court between Jan 1 and Oct 14, 2024. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 6 — More than 800 death row inmates in Malaysia have had their sentences commuted to imprisonment under the new Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Review Act 2023.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said 866 individuals received reduced sentences from the Federal Court between Jan 1 and Oct 14, 2024.

“Of that number, 52 were prisoners at the appeal stage who were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment.

“Additionally, another 814 individuals were granted a reduction of their death sentences to imprisonment through hearings under the Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Review (Temporary Jurisdiction of the Federal Court) Act 2023 [Act 847], which came into effect on September 12, 2023,” she said in a parliamentary written reply to Bukit Gelugor MP Ramkarpal Singh Deo.

Ramkarpal had asked the Prime Minister’s Department for the number of individuals newly sentenced to death from January 1 to October 14 this year, and the number of death penalty commutations during the same period.

Azalina noted that 18 individuals received new death sentences — 12 from the High Court and six from the Court of Appeal. - Malay Mail, 6/11/2024

 

Friday, June 20, 2025

Edisi Siasat blocked by Court Order on MCMC application? Whistleblower charged in court? Why Public Officers in PM's Department and Finance Ministry still not charged for 1MDB?

A whistle blower website Edisi Siasat has been blocked, and the whistleblower in the Sabah scandal have been charged... 

Does Malaysia encourage people to expose wrongdoings/crimes of Ministers, Prime Ministers, and others? When the 1MDB and SRC crimes were happening, why did not of our public officers expose it - if they did, then the CRIME could have been stopped, and Malaysia could have saved so much monies... Maybe, we need a law that would criminalize public officers who 'suspect' a crime for failing to report to the relevant law enforcement authorities...

Remember that PUBLIC OFFICERS are responsible to the Malaysian people, and not just the current PM and government... The fact that Prime Ministers and Ministers do commit crimes, sometimes abuse of power crimes, is already clear. Even now, there are pending investigations and trials ongoing against past government Prime Ministers, Ministers, etc.. After GE16, if and when PM Anwar's Madani Government is ousted, it is possible we will see cases being commenced against Ministers of this current government.

The 'attack' against whistleblowers or even investigative journalist who DARE to expose possible crimes of politicians in power, or their 'friends' was something we hoped will end when the 'REFORMASI' alternative government ousted the BN regime of old in GE14  - but it seems it is still here...

In George Orwell's Animal Farm, a key lesson is that even after overthrowing an oppressive regime, the new leaders can become just as corrupt and tyrannical as the old 

Anyway, 2 important NEWS

1 - The Whistleblower in the Sabah corruption case is not going to 'protected' but will charged in court - thus his/her identity will be exposed; and 

Malaysian whistle-blower to be charged alongside those he exposed,..Sabah-based businessman Albert Tei had secretly filmed senior state politicians allegedly soliciting and accepting bribes

 2 - The government has taken action against Edisi Siasat [The whistleblower Telegram channel Edisi Siasat has been banned and is no longer accessible.Checks by Malaysiakini revealed that the group, which had nearly 1.18 million members, cannot be viewed.“This channel can’t be displayed because it violated local laws (Malaysia),” a message on the group’s page stated.] - Now, the MCMC or the government ALLEGE that they violated laws - whether they actually did, or not is matter to be determined by Court??) Wonder what 'expose' made the government act? 

Online messaging platform Telegram has complied with a High Court order to stop the spread of offensive material by purported whistleblower channel “Edisi Siasat”. Checks on Telegram showed that Edisi Siasat has been blocked this evening, with users notified that the channel “can’t be displayed because it violated local laws”.FMT was made to understand that this was a result of Telegram complying with the interim injunction issued by the High Court.

 * What is happening to Edisi Siasat reminds us what happened to Sarawak Report, who played a significant role in exposing the 1MDB issue... 

In 2015, MCMC blocked access to the news blog Sarawak Report after the whistleblower website was deemed to have published content which could threaten national security.The UK-based website had earlier uploaded content about the 1MDB scandal. The blocking enforced under the administration of former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak, who is currently serving a prison sentence linked to the 1MDB scandal, was later lifted in 2018.

In a media report, it was stated that because Edisi Siasat was spreading 'content that could erode trust in public institutions and threaten social order.' 

So WHAT content, Minister Fahmi? And for something that may or may not happen in the future??? ...'could erode trust in public institutions...'  - so then similarly it means similar actions could be taken on all Malaysians social media accounts - because it too 'could erode trust...' anytime in the future.

Next, what 'trust in public institutions' - how much trust really remains in Malaysian public institutions today? If it already lost all trust of Malaysians - then why bother about further possible erosion of trust... Trust must be earned, but ...

Threaten Social Order - what does this mean Minister Fahmi? Does this ensuring that Madani Government and PM Anwar remain in power until GE16? What do you mean.

Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil and the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) must IMMEDIATELY inform Malaysians as to what is happening in detail - to avoid confusion.

1 - What was the alleged crime committed by Edisi Siasat? What post? How was it HARMFUL? Was it fake? Which law exactly did it violate - hopefully not that 'very wide can be abused in any situation Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (“CMA”) which many have called for its repeal)?

2 - Apparently, there was a Court application and a Court Order, and this is GOOD and the right way of doing this compared by arbitrary action by some government department. Courts will evaluate the application and make a legally acceptable order generally. So, Minister Fahmi, tell us what the Court application was all about? Was it a civil suit, and did the government get an ex-parte injunction order(a temporary injunction order after only 1 party(the government) was heard - which means there will soon be an inter-parte injunction soon where all parties[Telegram, Edisi Siasat, etc} will be heard before the court issues a temporary injunction or not) - So, Minister Fahmi disclose the FULL FACTS so that we, Malaysians know the TRUTH. If not, then the media and people may come to a wrong conclusion as to what that order is?? The Minister can issue a Statement, to be placed on the MCMC Website, to satisfy the requirement of TRANSPARENCY... The application and the Court Order/and Judgment must be made accessible to the public...

Hopefully it is not like 1MDB, where the then government, in my opinion, ABUSED ITS POWER to protect the then Prime Minister Najib and Government from crimes committed during the 1MDB scandal - crimes that have seen prosecution and convictions in so many different countries, not just Malaysia..

 

 

 

 

Malaysian whistle-blower to be charged alongside those he exposed, sparking debate

Sabah-based businessman Albert Tei had secretly filmed senior state politicians allegedly soliciting and accepting bribes

Reading Time:2 minutes
Sabah-based businessman Albert Tei. Photo: Facebook/Albert Tei
Hadi Azmi
 
Two Malaysian lawmakers – along with the businessman who exposed them in covert videos – have been arrested in Sabah state, anti-corruption authorities have confirmed, in a scandal that has raised questions over protections afforded to whistle-blowers.

Sabah, Malaysia’s second-largest state, is among the country’s poorest and has long been plagued by corruption allegations, including those linked to former chief minister Musa Aman, controversially appointed governor earlier this year.

On Wednesday, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief Azam Baki confirmed the arrests of the lawmakers in a major development since officials reopened investigations following strong public pressure.“Those people will be charged in court this month, maybe [towards] the end of this month, pending court dates,” Azam said.

But the MACC also confirmed that Sabah-based businessman Albert Tei would be charged alongside the two assemblymen – who were not named – as he was not protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010.

Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission chief Azam Baki. Photo: Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission
Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission chief Azam Baki. Photo: Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission

Tei had secretly filmed videos allegedly showing senior state politicians soliciting and accepting bribes. He shared the videos with news portal Malaysiakini, which posted them on its platform.

The footage went viral, prompting denials from the politicians involved, who accused Tei of releasing the videos as revenge for not receiving government contracts.

Initially, the MACC dismissed the videos as inadmissible as they were not directly surrendered to it and had been edited, but it reopened the case after public outcry.

MACC legal and prosecution senior director Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said the law clearly stated that anyone involved in the offence they reported would not be eligible for protection.

“If a person is involved in the offence in any way, they are not protected under the Act and therefore cannot be considered a whistle-blower,” he said. “This is to preserve the integrity of the whistle-blower framework and prevent it from being misused as a ‘shield’ by those trying to escape accountability.”

The legacy of Malaysia’s 1MDB scandal on politics and corruption-fighting

Transparency International Malaysia previously said Tei’s situation highlighted that whistle-blowing was rarely clear-cut and that reforms to strengthen protections for whistle-blowers – who were often caught between complicity and conscience – were needed.

Under Malaysia’s current Whistleblower Protection Act, those who approach the media before going to the authorities are also automatically disqualified from legal protection. This remains the case even when disclosures are made in good faith, based on a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing and are clearly in the public interest.

“If we are to genuinely support transparency and anti-corruption efforts, our laws must protect – not punish – those who take steps to correct wrongdoing in the public interest,” the NGO’s president, Raymon Ram, told This Week in Asia. SCMP, 19/6/2025

How the Sarawak Report Broke Malaysia’s 1MDB Scandal