Tuesday, March 19, 2019

On Death Penalty - What Malaysia accepted at the UPR in November 2018 - UN document dated 18/2/2019

For your information, Malaysia has published its response to the recommendations made during its review last November, and has accepted most of the death penalty ones. Based on UN document publishing Malaysia's response dated 18/2/2019 which states 'Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review'

It has fully accepted the following recommendations:
-          151.91 Establish a de facto moratorium on the death penalty with a view to its abolition (Portugal);
-          151.92 Ensure the adoption of the necessary legislation to abolish the death penalty in a timely manner (Republic of Moldova);
-          151.93 Continue to take steps for the abolishment of the death penalty and to revise the cases of persons on death row (Romania);
-          151.95 Establish a moratorium on the death penalty pending an act of Parliament to abolish it (Albania);
-          151.97 Continue with abolishing the death penalty and adopt a moratorium on the execution of the death penalty (Spain);
-          151.98 Take further steps in limiting capital crimes with the aim of abolishing the death penalty (Cyprus);
-          151.99 Intensify its efforts towards the abolition of the death penalty (Georgia);
-          151.100 Immediately place a moratorium on the application of the death penalty with a view to its complete abolition (Fiji);
-          151.104 Consider the adoption of a moratorium on executions (Italy);
-          151.106 Concretize the commitment of abolishing the death penalty as soon as possible (Switzerland);
-          151.107 Abolish the death penalty (Norway);
-          151.108 Introduce a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty (Paraguay);

It has partially accepted the following ones, with an aim to fully accept them in the course of the implementation cycle:
-          151.94 Complete legislative efforts aimed at abolishing the death penalty (Ukraine);
-          151.96 Ensure early submission to Parliament of legislation abolishing the death penalty and repealing the Sedition Act (Australia);
-          151.102 Maintain the recent moratorium on executions and completely abolish the death penalty (France);
-          151.103 Swiftly pass all necessary legislation to abolish the death penalty for all criminal offences (Germany);
-          151.105 Improve and implement legislation for the complete abolishment of the death penalty (Sweden);
ð  The following justification was given: The Government has announced on 10 October 2018 that the death penalty will be abolished. The announcement was made following the Cabinet’s decision for the Pardons Board to review their decision to reject the clemency request on death sentence and to consider replacing it with life imprisonment. A moratorium has also been imposed on all executions for death row inmates who have yet to be considered by the Pardons Board. Once the necessary legislation amendment for the abolition of the death penalty is deliberated at Parliament and endorsed, the recommendations will thereafter be fully accepted.

It has noted the following ones (yet it has emphasized that even the noted recommendations would remain under consideration in the next few years):
-          151.101 Fully abolish the death penalty without delay (Finland);
o   The following explanation was given for this response: “[…] With regard to the death penalty, once the amendment to the necessary legislation for the abolition of the death penalty is tabled before and passed by Parliament, the related recommendations will thereafter be accepted.
-          151.37 Ratify the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty (Montenegro);
o   The following explanation was given: The Government of Malaysia reaffirms its commitment to ratify all remaining international human rights instruments. However, there is a need to achieve precise and full understanding of the relevant rights and obligations as well as to consider the possibility of reconciling any of the standards established by the said instruments with those embodied in long-standing domestic laws, traditions and circumstances as well as philosophy, as reflected in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. As a responsible member of the international community, Malaysia has always taken into consideration its commitment and ability to fulfil the entailing obligations before becoming a signatory to any international instruments. With regard to the reservations made for the instruments that Malaysia has acceded to, these reservations will still be retained due to their inconsistency with the Federal Constitution, law and national policies. Nevertheless, consultations with the relevant Ministries and civil society organisations are ongoing to pursue the ratification of suitable conventions.

Thank you Jeanne Hirschberger, Assistante programmes / Programme support officer of ECPM 
 
-image for Malaysiakini
See earlier post that also shows Malaysia's official response on the various recomendations it accepted...which it only partially accepted and why...which it only noted and why.. .

What UPR recomendations Malaysia accepted. Why others partially accepted or just noted? (18/2/2019)



Torture, Education, Discrimination, Human Rights - Want to know what this PH government says? (18/2/2019)


 Below is Malaysia's response dated 18/2/2019 in response to the recommendations made by UN member countries on a wide range of issues. Malaysia accepted many. It explains also why it accepted some partially, and some it merely 'noted' - The explanations ought to be read as it concerns the death penalty, corporal punishment, migrant workers, indigenous people, human rights defenders, education, etc (I have highlighted the topics in red)..



Now, the document refers to recommendations by number, and to see what exactly these recommendation says, you may want to follow the link and see all documents concerning the UPR on Malaysia in detail at -   Universal Periodic Review - Malaysia

It is good to know what Malaysia accepted, partially accepted and/or noted.. 


A/HRC/40/11/Add.1

Advance Version
Distr.: General
18 February 2019

Original: English





Human Rights Council
Fortieth session
25 February–22 March 2019
Agenda item 6
Universal Periodic Review
               Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review*
               Malaysia
                   Addendum
                   Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review




Malaysia’s position on the recommendations received during the third Universal Periodic Review (UPR) on 8 November 2018

1.   Malaysia sees the UPR as an exemplification of positive dialogue between friends and as a forum for sharing of best practices in the field of human rights under the United Nations Human Rights Council. Malaysia’s Third UPR has provided us with an avenue for a constructive and frank assessment on our achievements and shortcomings.

2.   This is in tandem with the spirit of the Malaysian Government in placing greater importance and urgency on issues of human rights while at same time recognising the difficult steps and challenges which we have to undertake.

3.   During its Third UPR, Malaysia received a total of 268 recommendations put forward by 108 Member States. In deliberating the recommendations, the Government discussed with all relevant stakeholders which involved the civil society organisations (CSOs), Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), Ministries and Agencies at both the Federal and State levels.

4.   Malaysia is pleased to accept 147 recommendations in full (outright) and 37 recommendations are accepted in part. Outright acceptance is whereby the Government of Malaysia is able to adhere fully to the principles and spirit of the recommendations. On the other hand, those accepted in part means that the Government of Malaysia agrees with and is able to implement part of the recommendations due to existing Government policies or position.

5.   Malaysia also takes note of 84 recommendations due to several reasons, which amongst others being in contradiction with the Federal Constitution or existing laws. In addition to that, some recommendations which were made were formulated based on inaccurate assumptions or assertions.

6.   Nonetheless, the Government of Malaysia wishes to emphasize that all recommendations accepted in part or noted will be regularly reviewed taking into consideration its domestic development and international obligations. It is therefore fluid in nature.

               Recommendations fully accepted by Malaysia
7.   151.5, 151.6, 151.9, 151.24, 151.26, 151.31, 151.44, 151.47, 151.49, 151.50, 151.51, 151.52, 151.53, 151.54, 151.58, 151.59, 151.61, 151.62, 151.63, 151.64, 151.65, 151.66, 151.67, 151.68, 151.70, 151.71, 151.72, 151.73, 151.74, 151.75, 151.76, 151.86, 151.87, 151.88, 151.89, 151.90, 151.91, 151.92, 151.93, 151.95, 151.97, 151.98, 151.99, 151.100, 151.104, 151.106, 151.107, 151.108, 151.114, 151.116, 151.117, 151.118, 151.119, 151.120, 151.121, 151.122, 151.123, 151.124, 151.125, 151.128, 151.130, 151.135, 151.136, 151.139, 151.143, 151.147, 151.148, 151.149, 151.153, 151.154, 151.155, 151.156, 151.157, 151.158, 151.159, 151.160, 151.161, 151.162, 151.163, 151.164, 151.165, 151.166, 151.167, 151.168, 151.169, 151.170, 151.171, 151.172, 151.173, 151.174, 151.175, 151.176, 151.177, 151.178, 151.179, 151.180, 151.181, 151.182, 151.183, 151.184, 151.185, 151.186, 151.187, 151.189, 151.191, 151.192, 151.193, 151.194, 151.200, 151.201, 151.202, 151.203, 151.204, 151.205, 151.206, 151.207, 151.210, 151.211, 151.214, 151.216, 151.220, 151.221, 151.222, 151.223, 151.226, 151.229, 151.230, 151.231, 151.233, 151.244, 151.245, 151.246, 151.247, 151.248, 151.249, 151.250, 151.252, 151.253, 151.254, 151.256, 151.257, 151.259, 151.261, 151.264, 151.265, 151.266 and 151.267.

               Recommendations partially accepted by Malaysia
8.   151.8, 151.19, 151.29, 151.34, 151.35, 151.43, 151.94, 151.96, 151.102, 151.103, 151.105, 151.110, 151.115, 151.126, 151.134, 151.137, 151.138, 151.140, 151.141, 151.144, 151.145, 151.146, 151.188, 151.195, 151.196, 151.197, 151.198, 151.224, 151.225, 151.227, 151.234, 151.235, 151.238, 151.241, 151.243, 151.251 and 151.263.

                   Clarification for the partially accepted recommendations

                1.      International instruments and dual legal system
                         Recommendations 151.8, 151.19, 151.29, 151.35 and 151.43

9.   The Government of Malaysia commits itself to ratifying all remaining core international human rights instruments as stated by the Prime Minister at the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly. The Government of Malaysia has always adhered in principle to the fundamental values expounded in the core international human rights treaties. Notwithstanding that, the signing and ratification by Malaysia will be carried out after in-depth consultation with all relevant stakeholders. The Government of Malaysia will also want to ensure that it will be in a position to fulfil its international obligations entailed following the signing or ratification of the treaties.

10. The jurisdiction of the Civil and Syariah Courts in Malaysia is provided for under the Federal Constitution. The Government of Malaysia will continue to take steps to further harmonise these dual legal systems.

                2.      Migrant workers

                         Recommendations 151.34 and 151.263

11. Malaysia will continue to protect and promote the rights of migrant workers in line with the International Labour Standards as well as regional instruments in accordance with relevant domestic legislations. To date, all foreigners have access to medical services including sexual and reproductive health at private or public health services subject to charges according to the Fees Act 1951.

                3.      Death penalty
                         Recommendations 151.94, 151.96, 151.102, 151.103 and 151.105

12. The Government has announced on 10 October 2018 that the death penalty will be abolished. The announcement was made following the Cabinet’s decision for the Pardons Board to review their decision to reject the clemency request on death sentence and to consider replacing it with life imprisonment. A moratorium has also been imposed on all executions for death row inmates who have yet to be considered by the Pardons Board. Once the necessary legislation amendment for the abolition of the death penalty is deliberated at Parliament and endorsed, the recommendations will thereafter be fully accepted.

                4.      Corporal punishment and enforcement
                         Recommendation 151.110

13. Malaysia wishes to emphasize that the valid and legal forms of corporal punishments such as whipping and caning as prescribed under its domestic laws will only be carried out upon the direction of the Courts.

14. Nonetheless, the relevant national legislation has been strengthened through the review of Law and Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and establishment of the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (SIAP) to prevent the torture and ill-treatment by enforcement agencies.

                5.      Trafficking in persons
                         Recommendation 151.115

15. The Government of Malaysia will always assist victims of trafficking in persons within the ambit of its legal jurisdiction, with the ultimate aim of ensuring the safe return of the victims to their home country.

                6.      Security Act and human rights defenders
                         Recommendations 151.126, 151.137, 151.138, 151.140, 151.141, 151.144, 151.145 and 151.146

16. A Special Committee has been established to review several laws including the Sedition Act 1948, Printing Presses and Publications Act, POCA, SOSMA, Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 and POTA. The recommendations proposed by the Special Committee will be submitted to the Cabinet for consideration. The Government will take into account its international human rights obligations while making the necessary amendments to ensure that public order and security are safeguarded.

                7.      Right to education
                         Recommendations 151.188, 151.195, 151.196, 151.197, 151.198, 151.224, 151.227 and 151.251

17. In Malaysia, access to formal education is provided to all Malaysian children including indigenous people, the underprivileged children and children with disabilities, as stipulated in Article 12 of the Federal Constitution. The Government of Malaysia will continue to take more progressive measures towards broadening education facilities to include those previously denied access, as what has been done with stateless children.

               Recommendations noted by Malaysia

18. 151.1, 151.2, 151.3, 151.4, 151.7, 151.10, 151.11, 151.12, 151.13, 151.14, 151.15, 151.16, 151.17, 151.18, 151.20, 151.21, 151.22, 151.23, 151.25, 151.27, 151.28, 151.30, 151.32, 151.33, 151.36, 151.37, 151.38, 151.39, 151.40, 151.41, 151.42, 151.45, 151.46, 151.48, 151.55. 151.56, 151.57, 151.60, 151.69, 151.77, 151.78, 151.79, 151.80, 151.81, 151.82, 151.83, 151.84, 151.85, 151.101, 151.109, 151.111, 151.112, 151.113, 151.127, 151.129, 151.131, 151.132, 151.133, 151.142, 151.150, 151.151, 151.152, 151.190, 151.199, 151.208, 151.209, 151.212, 151.213, 151.215, 151.217 151.218, 151.219, 151.228, 151.232, 151.236, 151.237, 151.239, 151.240, 151.242, 151.255, 151.258, 151.260, 151.262 and 151.268.

                   Clarification for the noted recommendations

                1.      International human rights instruments
                         Recommendations 151.1, 151.2, 151.3, 151.4, 151.7, 151.10, 151.11, 151.12, 151.13, 151.14, 151.15, 151.16, 151.17, 151.18, 151.20, 151.21, 151.22, 151.23, 151.25, 151.27, 151.28, 151.30, 151.32, 151.33, 151.36, 151.37, 151.38, 151.39, 151.40, 151.41, 151.42, 151.45, 151.46

19. The Government of Malaysia reaffirms its commitment to ratify all remaining international human rights instruments. However, there is a need to achieve precise and full understanding of the relevant rights and obligations as well as to consider the possibility of reconciling any of the standards established by the said instruments with those embodied in long-standing domestic laws, traditions and circumstances as well as philosophy, as reflected in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. As a responsible member of the international community, Malaysia has always taken into consideration its commitment and ability to fulfil the entailing obligations before becoming a signatory to any international instruments. With regard to the reservations made for the instruments that Malaysia has acceded to, these reservations will still be retained due to their inconsistency with the Federal Constitution, law and national policies. Nevertheless, consultations with the relevant Ministries and civil society organisations are ongoing to pursue the ratification of suitable conventions.

                2.      Human rights mechanism
                         Recommendation 151.48

20. The Government has consistently cooperated with the Special Procedures mandate holders. For example, Malaysia is expected to receive the visit by the SR on extreme poverty and human rights in August 2019. Malaysia will continue to work closely with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to facilitate future country visits by the Special Procedures mandate holders.

                3.      Anti-discrimination law and vulnerable groups
                         Recommendations 151.55. 151.56, 151.57, 151.69

21. The Government is currently seeking views and inputs from stakeholders to legislate a National Harmony Bill aimed at promoting national harmony, unity, reconciliation, integration and non-discrimination. Vulnerable groups officially recognized by the Government are women, children, older persons, person with disabilities, the destitute and homeless.

                4.      LGBT
                         Recommendations 151.77, 151.78, 151.79, 151.80, 151.81, 151.82, 151.83, 151.84, 151.85

22. The Government of Malaysia recognises that the rule of law depends on the moral consensus of the community which cannot be ignored in a democracy. In Malaysia, cultural or religious beliefs directly influence the views and outlook as well as the law on questions of sexual behaviours and the moral ethos of communities. The Government of Malaysia does not discriminate against the LGBT community and their rights are protected in accordance with our domestic laws.

                5.      Death penalty and corporal punishment
                         Recommendations 151.101, 151.109, 151.111, 151.112, 151.113, 151.228

23. Malaysia wishes to emphasize that corporal punishment as prescribed under its domestic laws will only be executed when a person is found guilty and convicted by the Courts. With regard to the death penalty, once the amendment to the necessary legislation for the abolition of the death penalty is tabled before and passed by Parliament, the related recommendations will thereafter be accepted.

                6.      Freedom of religion
                         Recommendations 151.127, 151.129, 151.131, 151.132, 151.133

24. Malaysia recognises the right to freedom of religion, as provided under Article 11 (1) of the Federal Constitution which states that "every person has the right to profess and practise his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it". Clause (4) allows States the power to legislate for the control or restriction of the propagation of any religious doctrine among persons professing Islam. The right to freedom of religion in Malaysia constitutionally guarantees the rights of any person to profess, practice, and propagate its own religion. Every person in Malaysia has the right to profess and practice any religion and subject to Article 11(4) on the propagation of religion.

                7.      Freedom of opinion and expression, freedom of speech
Recommendation 151.142

25. Malaysia remains committed to upholding the right to freedom of opinion and expression as enshrined in its Federal Constitution. The Government is in the process of amending the relevant laws but a complete abrogation may not be possible.

                8.      Transmission of nationality and application of permanent residency
                         Recommendations 151.150, 151.151, 151.152, 151.208 and 151.262

26. The Government wishes to emphasize that the registration for citizenship must be done in accordance with the relevant articles as stipulated in the Federal Constitution.

27. The Government would also like to highlight that subject to qualifications, foreigners may apply passes such as Resident Pass from the Immigration Department which will enable them to reside in Malaysia with their family. Permanent Resident Identity Card (MyPR) is the basis of eligibility of an individual to apply for Malaysian citizenship. Therefore, each application is thoroughly scrutinized to ensure national security and protect the best interest of the citizens.

28. Existing legislation framework for awarding citizenship in Malaysia is adequate in addressing this issue while laws on citizenship in Malaysia are based on provisions under Part III of the Federal Constitution. It is not awarded automatically and is subject to individual applications. With regard to the issue of equality, both men and women are given avenues under the Federal Constitution to confer Malaysian citizenship for their children. To ensure that sovereignty and national security are protected, all applications are properly reviewed especially with regard to foreign citizenships as Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship.

                9.      Education and health
                         Recommendations 151.190, 151.199, 151.260, and 151.268

29. Formal education is only for children of Malaysian citizens while healthcare is accessible to everyone.

30. Although Malaysia is not a State Party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, it has introduced guidelines for the establishment and registration of Community Learning Centres (CLC) and Alternative Learning Centres (ALC) as an alternative for undocumented non-citizen children to gain access to education in Malaysia.

              10      Women, children and gender equality
                         Recommendations 151.60, 151.209, 151.212, 151.213, 151.215, 151.217, 151.218, 151.219, 151.232, 151.236, 151.237, 151.239, 151.240, 151.242

31. The Government has always placed importance on the promotion and protection of the rights of the child, including taking the necessary measures to set up the minimum age of marriage. The Government will also strengthen its efforts in addressing the main factors of child marriages such as low income household, school drop outs and lack of knowledge on sexual reproductive health.

32. Malaysia objects to any practices that are harmful to female babies and children. Female circumcision is allowed to be practiced under strict medical procedures performed by accredited medical professionals.

33. In 2004, the Penal Code was amended vide the Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2004 to insert a new Section 375A which provides that:
“Any man who during the subsistence of a valid marriage causes hurt or fear of death or hurt to his wife or any other person in order to have sexual intercourse with his wife shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years”. Any man who is found guilty of this offence shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years”.

34. Section 375A mainly intends to further strengthen legal protection for wives from being hurt by their husbands in order to have sexual intercourse, although the term “marital rape” is not explicitly stipulated in the provision.

35. Apart from section 375A, there are other existing provisions in the Penal Code which can be resorted by wives, depending on facts of the case. Among others, a husband can always be charged for an offence of causing injury in which the punishment may go as high as 20 years imprisonment. Such a punishment is generally similar to punishment for rape, and significantly higher than certain other countries that make specific provision for “marital rape”.

             11.      Indigenous peoples

                         Recommendations 151.255 and 151.258

36. The Government takes note that UNDRIP covers all aspects of the rights of indigenous peoples including economic, social, political, cultural and land. However, as each State in the Federation has its own jurisdiction over their natural resources, the Government of Malaysia will continue to look for the best manner in ensuring the rights of the indigenous peoples are protected.

37. The Government of Malaysia will continue to ensure that the indigenous people are represented at the highest level, including having their voices heard as Senators and Members of Parliament.
                                      



                     *   The present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services.
 

Mahathir, the Cabinet and government must have the courage to abolish the Death Penalty, not just the Mandatory Death Penalty(MADPET)


Media Statement – 14/3/2019
Mahathir, the Cabinet and government must have the courage to abolish the Death Penalty, not just the Mandatory Death Penalty
-          Table the Bills, and let Parliament Decide on the Abolition of Death Penalty 
MADPET (Malaysians against Death Penalty and Torture) is saddened by the alleged U-turn by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and his Cabinet who had decided earlier to abolish the death penalty, but now will apparently only abolish the mandatory death penalty.
On 13/3/2019, Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohamed Hanipa Maidin was reported saying in Parliament that only the mandatory death penalty will be repealed, being the mandatory death penalty for nine offences under the Penal Code and two under the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971. (Malay Mail, 13/3/2019)

It must be noted that the Cabinet under Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, had at a meeting in October 2018, decided to repeal not just the mandatory death, but the death penalty for 33 offences under eight acts. 

‘The Cabinet has decided to abolish the death penalty, and it will be tabled in the next Parliament sitting, which will begin on October 15, said Datuk Liew Vui Keong [Minister in charge of law in the Prime Minister’s Department] …. “All death penalty will be abolished. Full stop.” ‘ (Malay Mail, 10/10/2018)

This decision was applauded worldwide, and even celebrated at the recent 7th World Congress Against the Death Penalty in Brussels on 26/2/2019 to 1/3/2019, who also highlighted the United Nations General Assembly 7th Resolution for the moratorium of executions pending abolition that was adopted on 17/12/2018, with 121 in favour(including Malaysia for the very first time), 35 Against  and 32 Abstention.

It is now disappointing that some Cabinet Members and political parties in Pakatan Harapan may have buckled, and this maybe what led to a change in position. It must be noted that at the end of the day, it is the Prime Minister that chooses his Cabinet, and so blame would really fall on the Prime Minister.

All the Cabinet had to do was to table the Bill/s to repeal the death penalty, and leave it to Parliament. If Parliament defeats the Bill, then blame lies with Parliament not Mahathir and his Cabinet.

The mandatory death penalty has already been declared unconstitutional in about 12 jurisdictions, the last being in Kenya and in June 2018, in Barbados. There is currently a challenge at the Federal Court, seeking a similar declaration that the mandatory death penalty is unconstitutional, in a case represented by Gopal Sri Ram. (Star, 6/3/2019). The court may most likely declare that mandatory death penalty is unconstitutional.

 Mandatory sentences, is undemocratic and unconstitutional as the legislature infringes and takes away completely the power of the Judiciary, when it comes to the imposition of an appropriate and just sentence on a convicted person. Parliament could fix minimum, and maybe maximum sentences but should never take away judge’s discretion when it comes to sentencing.

As such, the abolition of the mandatory death penalty is  long overdue, but is really no great achievement. Abolishing the death penalty, on the hand, will be something we can all be proud of, as Malaysia joins the majority of nations. Everytime someone is executed, every Malaysian is responsible for the death.

The reason for the abolition of the death penalty is clear. It has been shown in Malaysia that it is no deterrent to crime. It has been shown for drug trafficking, and we believe that number of murders have been increasing, a fact that cannot be shown ever since the past government stopped giving actual statistics of crimes, including murder since about 2014. Now, we get a crime index, which is a basket of several crimes, which hides the fact whether the number of murders, rapes, snatch thefts, robberies or any particular crimes are actually increasing or decreasing. Malaysians deserve real statistics of each and every crime.

The risk of miscarriage of justice is very real, where an innocent man could wrongly be executed – the flaws of the administrative of justice is real. Many believe that Anwar Ibrahim, who was convicted and sentenced twice for sodomy, is such a ‘miscarriage of justice’. The police, prosecutors, lawyers and judges can all make mistakes or wrongs. Anwar was lucky as his sentence was imprisonment, not death.

Spending time in prison is adequate punishment, and there is really no justification of putting anyone to death in this modern world. The notion justice will be done only by the killing killers, raping those who rape, beating up those who had assaulted others and such kind of punishments is not the kind of justice that Malaysia should ever advocate.  

Without the total abolition of death penalty, Malaysia is most unlikely to bring back Sirul Azhar from Australia, and as such that may prejudice the investigation of other perpetrators who may have been involved in ordering or paying for the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder.

In a criminal trial, accused person will usually elect to remain silence, not pleading guilty or let alone say ‘I did it with so and so’ or “I did it because I was ordered or paid to do so by some other person’ because any such statement will also be a personal admission of guilt. It is also less likely for those sentenced to death, to even after all appeals and petitions are exhausted to come forward and give information about perpetrators yet to identified and/or prosecuted – what is the use, as they still will be executed.

Remember that there is always a possibility that those perpetrators, still free and unidentified, may threaten the convicted to remain silent, if not their family members may be harmed. However, if the sentence is not death, then there is a better chance of the convicted speaking up and more perpetrators being brought to justice.

Malaysia, being a Muslim majority nation, should also not insist the death penalty, now in secular laws not Islamic laws,  that do not comply with the evidential and procedural requirement of Islam, to be retained. Christians, and especially Catholics, after Pope Francis’s clear position for the abolition of the death penalty,  also do not support the continued existence of the death penalty. Likewise, Buddhist, Hindus and Sikhs that advocate the sanctity of life, should be against the death penalty.

SUHAKAM, the Malaysian Bar, Parliamentarians for Global Action(PGA) and so many others also wants the Death Penalty abolished in Malaysia.  

It must be pointed out that even in France, when the death penalty was abolished by the government, over 60% of the population were against abolition.

The Prime Minister and the parliamentarians must have the required political will and courage to do the right and just, and immediately abolish the death penalty.

The worry of loss of popular support and the impact on the next General Elections, in 4 years time, is a deplorable reason not to completely abolish the death penalty now.  

MADPET urges PM Mahathir and his cabinet to bravely table the Bill to abolish the death penalty for all offences, and let Parliament decide on it. Let the votes be transparent, so all will know how each and every Parliamentarian voted, which will also help in people to later lobby their MPs.

MADPET also calls for the continued moratorium on all executions pending the abolition of the death penalty.

MADPET calls on the Malaysian political parties to come out and clearly state their position on the Death Penalty. It is shameful to give the impression in certain forums that it is for the abolition of the death penalty, only to see some of their leaders come out later taking an opposite stance.

MADPET also calls for Parliamentarians in the Opposition and backbenchers to also support the abolition of the death penalty on principle and for justice, and not simply vote against it just because it is a Bill tabled by the government.

Charles Hector
For and on behalf MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Deputy minister: Death penalty to stay but will be made optional


Hanipa said the mandatory death penalty was for nine offences under the Penal Code and two under the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971. ― Picture by Yusof Mat Isa
Hanipa said the mandatory death penalty was for nine offences under the Penal Code and two under the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971. ― Picture by Yusof Mat Isa
KUALA LUMPUR, March 13 — The mandatory death penalty for 11 criminal offences are to be repealed and substituted with the death penalty imposed at the discretion of the court, the Dewan Rakyat was told today.

Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohamed Hanipa Maidin said this mandatory death penalty was for nine offences under the Penal Code and two under the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971.

“We have made a decision. The government will only repeal the mandatory death penalty. We will make the amendments. This is in keeping with the 27th pledge in the Pakatan Harapan (election) manifesto,” he said when replying to a question from Datuk Che Abdullah Mat Nawi (PAS-Tumpat) during Question Time.

Replying to a supplementary question from Abdullah on whether the government intends to set up a parliamentary select committee to discuss the repeal of the death penalty before tabling the amendment bill, Mohamed Hanipa said he would forward the suggestion to the government.

The Cabinet, at a meeting in October 2018, decided to repeal the mandatory death penalty for 33 offences under eight acts. — Bernama - Malay Mail, 13/3/2019


Minister: Putrajaya to abolish death penalty


Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Liew Vui Keong, gives a speech during the ‘Law Reform Talk’ in Universiti Malaya October 10, 2018. — Picture by Miera Zulyana
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Liew Vui Keong, gives a speech during the ‘Law Reform Talk’ in Universiti Malaya October 10, 2018. — Picture by Miera Zulyana

PETALING JAYA, Oct 10 — The Cabinet has decided to abolish the death penalty, and it will be tabled in the next Parliament sitting, which will begin on October 15, said Datuk Liew Vui Keong.
The minister in charge of law in the Prime Minister’s Department said while the government is studying certain cases, as of now, all executions have been halted.
“All death penalty will be abolished. Full stop.
“We are studying certain issues... we need to look into it and hear the views of all, but as it stands today, the decision is to abolish the death penalty,” he told the media after the “Law Reform Talk” at Universiti Malaya here, today.

Liew said that with Putrajaya intending to abolish the death penalty, the Pardons Board will be tasked with looking into the applications of death row inmates.

“Our view is that executions should not be carried out we will inform the Pardons Board to look into the various applications for all the death row inmates to either commute or release them.

“When commuted, they would have to face life imprisonment because there had been several deaths that were caused by the offender and so they were sentenced to death by the court,” he said.

Liew added that all the paperwork for the abolishment of the law is in its final stages, and that the Attorney General (AG) had given the green light for it to be tabled in Parliament.

“All the papers are in the final stage. The AG has also indicated to us that it is ready to be tabled, hopefully in this (Parliamentary) session,” he said.

Earlier in his opening speech, Liew said the Pakatan Harapan government is also mulling a repeal of the Sedition Act 1948 and other draconian laws. - Malay Mail, 10/10/2019

No more suspending MPs from Parliament? BN era bad practices should not continue

Suspending Members of Parliament and/or ADUNs/Senators which results in their being removed from the House, and not being allowed in for a few days is a draconian practice that really must stop. This should be a REFORM brought in by the new PH government.

When a peoples' representative is removed, he/she is denied the ability to participate - to ask questions and express their views. This prejudices tens of thousands of Malaysians who elected that particular MP/ADUN/Senator.. 

If an MP/ADUN/Senator does wrong, the more appropriate form of punishment is a FINE, which is personal and comes from that representatives pocket..It will not impact on the rights of people/constituents -  they still have the peoples' representative present and participating in the very forum he should definitely be being the Dewan Rakyat or the relevant House.

ABSENTEEISM - well, that really should be an offence that should be punished. If there is some really good reason, being a reason related to being an MP/ADUN/Senator or being a member of the Federal/State Cabinet or government, it may be excusable. If the reason is that he has to be present elsewhere is something connected to his side-business and/or profession - that is not a good reason. An MP, who is a lawyer, says he cannot be in Parliament because he has a case in Court, or a dentist MP saying that he had to attend to a surgery/customer is really not a good reason. MPs should be full-time MPs or peoples' representatives - they are being paid high enough, whereby a basic salary is about RM16,000 (with the various different allowances, it may be even higher..). Now, Parliament does not even disclose the attendance list of MPs (which should not just state date they were absent, but also the times that they were absent in each day).   

There was one MP apparently, who never turned up for months to be sworn in - and that was OK? I think not swearing in and not attending Parliament are serious offences that violates peoples' rights - the right to be represented in Parliament.

When should an MP/ADUN/Senator be removed from the House? Well, if he has become uncontrollable, then maybe he can be removed for a few hours or even a day, but the reason is to allow him to cool down - so that his/her behaviour does not disrupt proceedings in the house.

During the BN era, there were cases where MPs were suspended for days...and that was wrong..

Now, during the PH reign, such bad practices must not repeat itself...No more suspension or barring of MPs from the Dewan/House... save only to cool down emotional outbreaks that disrupt proceedings...


 


Opposition walks out after Noh Omar suspended for 3 days


Chan Kok Leong
OPPOSITION MPs staged a walkout today after deputy speaker Nga Kor Ming suspended Barisan Nasional’s Noh Omar for three days from Parliament proceedings for questioning the integrity of the speaker’s office.

The 20 MPs from BN and PAS were led by Ismail Mohamed Said (Kuala Krau-BN) and Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man (Kubang Kerian-PAS).  

Earlier, Nga said that Noh was suspended for questioning the integrity of the speaker’s office.
Noh was not in Dewan Rakyat this morning, which led Ismail to tell Nga that he should make the ruling when the Tanjung Karang MP was in the chamber.

‘He is not here. He should be here to defend himself or be given a chance to apologise,” he said.
However, Nga said it was every MP’s responsibility to be present when the sitting started.

Nga said it was not his job to ensure Noh was in the chamber when the meeting started.

Seeing that the deputy speaker was not going to budge, Ismail, a deputy speaker when BN was in power, led the walkout.

“This is an abuse of the speaker’s power as this issue happened outside Parliament.

“When Nga made the statements about PAS and Umno, it was done outside where he didn’t have any immunity.

“Noh had only asked him to clarify his statements,” said opposition leader Ismail Sabri Yaakob during a press conference in the Parliament lobby.

Ismail Sabri said there was also an element of conflict of interest as the matter involved Nga.
Ismail Sabri, a former deputy speaker, said Standing Orders 43 and 44 state that MPs who are to be sanctioned should be in Parliament when the orders are given.

“This is not the convention as Noh wasn’t here this morning,” said Ismail Sabri.

He said that the Tanjung Karang MP should be given the chance to withdraw the remarks before the deputy speaker made his ruling.

The opposition MPs said they will stay out of the proceedings today as long as Nga chairs the Dewan Rakyat.

During the debate yesterday, Ahmad Fadhli Shaari (Pasir Mas-PAS) said that comments about the Umno-PAS partnership would turn Malaysia into a Taliban state was unhelpful.

At this point, Noh interjected to say that if Nga felt he had been misreported, he should have sued the media.

“If it’s true that Nga did not say those words, he should sue the parties as he is a lawyer. He should respect the robes he’s wearing and not try to cheat Parliament,” said Noh.

Nga said he had already explained his remarks in Parliament last week, to which Noh questioned why Nga’s statements within and without Parliament were different.

“Did you or did you not make those statements? You are not fit to be deputy speaker for saying different things within and without Parliament. It’s shameful to Parliament and the robes you wear,” said Noh yesterday. – March 19, 2019. - Malaysian Insight, 19/3/2019


Opposition MPs walk out from Dewan Rakyat after Noh Omar suspended

Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri (centre) and other opposition MPs stage a walkout from the Dewan Rakyat March 19, 2019. — Picture by Miera Zulyana
Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri (centre) and other opposition MPs stage a walkout from the Dewan Rakyat March 19, 2019. — Picture by Miera Zulyana
KUALA LUMPUR, Mar 18 — About 20 Opposition MPs staged a walkout from the Dewan Rakyat this morning, saying they would not return as long as Deputy Speaker Nga Kor Ming chairs the proceedings in the Lower House of Parliament.

The Barisan Nasional (BN) and PAS lawmakers had done so in protest over Nga’s ruling earlier to suspend Tanjung Karang MP Tan Sri Noh Omar for three days effective immediately.

Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri said the MPs will discuss if they will table a motion against Nga, accusing the latter of misusing his power.

“We urge the deputy speaker to retract the ruling as the issue raised had nothing to do with sitting.

“It is misuse of power as as he could not suspend Tanjung Karang for an issue that had taken place outside of the Dewan Rakyat,” Ismail told reporters outside the House, referring to a statement made by Nga on the Umno-PAS union that prompted Noh to ask the deputy speaker for a clarification yesterday.

Nga suspended Noh after the latter branded him unfit to sit as deputy speaker.... Malay Mail, 19/3/2019