Sunday, July 24, 2022

Do not send recently acquitted wrongly convicted migrant worker out of Malaysia until he exercises his rights in Malaysian Courts and other avenues of justice - No attempts of ‘cover-up’ or preventing access of justice(19 Gps) - 24/7/2022

 

Media Statement – 24/7/2022

Do not send recently acquitted wrongly convicted migrant worker out of Malaysia until he exercises his rights in Malaysian Courts and other avenues of justice

No attempts of ‘cover-up’ or preventing access of justice

We the 19 undersigned groups are pleased that on 22/7/2022, the Tawau High Court Judge Dr Lim Hock Leng after revision acquitted documented migrant worker, Sabri bin Umar and ordered him released from prison immediately. Sabri was released on 22/7/2022.


On 19/4/2022, Sabri was wrongly convicted for being illegally in Malaysia for the offence under Section 6(1)( c) Immigration Act 1959/63 by the Tawau Session Court, when in fact he was a documented migrant worker with a valid work permit/pass at the material time.  This was a fact evident from, amongst others, Sabri’s Indonesian Passport, which was taken by the police when he was arrested on 5/4/2022.

The court acknowledged the fact that Sabri was whipped, which was an act against Malaysian law which prohibits the carrying out the sentence of whipping of the convicted until appeal filed is heard and determined. This was also confirmed by the Prison Department.

The highlighting of Sabri’s miscarriage of justice, vide Joint Media Statement by 45 groups issued on 19/7/2022 entitled, Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard’ and various letters, including from Sabri’s union, Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU) got the High Court’s attention that led to the calling up Sabri’s case for revision on 22/7/2022.

Worry of deportation or sending of Sabri out of Malaysia

We are worried that Sabri may be deported or send out of Malaysia.  This may be conceived as an attempt to ‘cover up’ the possible wrongful actions of the police, immigration department, prison department, prosecution, the employer, the courts and the government that caused an innocent man to be wrongfully charged, convicted and sentenced to 11 months imprisonment and 5 strokes of the whip. Sending out of Malaysia, may impede Sabri’s quest for justice, whereby all legal actions reasonably will have to be commenced in Malaysia and Sabri’s absence from the country may be detrimental to his enforcing his rights.

As it is, Sabri has already commenced a claim for reinstatement by reason of wrongful dismissal at the Industrial Relations Department, which is progressing and will be referred to the Industrial Court. Sabri wants to work and live legally in Malaysia, and his wife is also a migrant worker in the country.

Sabri’s Claims Against Malaysia For Wrongful Conviction And Whipping

Initial investigations have shown that Malaysian government, the police, the Immigration Department, Prosecutors, Prison Department and maybe even the employer may be liable for the grave injustice that has befallen Sabri. Sabri had to spend almost 94 days in prison, and 14 days in detention. He was wrongly whipped 5 times on 23/6/2022, despite there being an appeal that was filed on 22/4/2022 and yet to be heard. Sabri may also have a claim against the Indonesian government, and his lawyer.

The Prison Department, in their letter dated 18/7/2022, stated that the whipping was only carried out after they received a letter from the Session Court saying that there were no appeals from any party. This was false as there was an appeal yet to be heard.

The Immigration Department also furnished false records about Sabri, that also led to the Court being misled into believing that Sabri was an undocumented migrant, who had entered and remained illegally in Malaysia.

Besides the Malaysian government and its various departments, Sabri may also have cause of action against the Indonesian government and the lawyer.

Sending Migrants out of Malaysia impedes ability to maintains claims of rights violation

The speedy sending of migrants out of Malaysia, even when they have valid claims against their employer and/or others, which requires the physical presence of complainant/claimant at the law enforcement departments and/or courts, has denied many a migrant from even being able to claim their rights using the available legal avenues in Malaysia. Calls for confirmation of whether migrant workers have existing rights/claims or ongoing cases before sending them out of Malaysia has yet receive positive response.

Therefore, we

-          Call on Malaysia and/or Indonesia not to cause Sabri bin Umar to be send out of Malaysia before he can exercise all his rights/claims in Malaysian avenues of justice, including his present claim for reinstatement by reason of wrongful dismissal at the Industrial Department/Court;

 

-          Call on all parties to not threaten, deceive and/or pressure Sabri from exercising his right to claim for damages, compensation and justice from relevant parties that have unjustly deprived Sabri his freedoms and rights, and caused him sufferings; and

 

-          Call on the government of Malaysia to ensure that Sabri can continue to work and stay legally in Malaysia until all his claims for justice are determined and satisfied.

 

Charles Hector

Apolinar Z Tolentino, Jr.

Adrian Pereira

 

For and on behalf of the 19 organisations listed below

ALIRAN

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia Pacific Region

WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)

North South Initiative

Black Women for Wages for Housework, US

Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL), Cambodia

Centre for Orang  Asli Concerns (COAC), Malaysia

Club Employees Union Peninsular Malaysia

Haiti Action Committee

Labour Law Reform Coalition, Malaysia

Network of Action For Migrants in Malaysia(NAMM)

Sabah Plantation Industry Employees Union, Malaysia

Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU)

Union of Forestry Employee Sarawak (UFES)

Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy

The William Gomes Podcast, UK

Timber Employee Union Peninsular Malaysia

Women of Color/Global Women’s Strike, US and UK

 

See earlier Statement - 

Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard - Statement of 45 Groups- 19/7/2022

Tuesday, July 19, 2022

Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard - Statement of 45 Groups- 19/7/2022

Media coverage

https://focusmalaysia.my/indonesian-migrant-worker-in-sabah-wrongfully-whipped-before-appeal-heard/

Media Statement (45 GROUPS) – 19/7/2022

Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard

We the 45 undersigned groups and organizations are shocked that Indonesian migrant worker Sabri bin Umar was whipped at the Tawau Prison on 23/6/2022 despite there being an appeal at the High Court regarding his conviction/sentence by the Session Court which have yet to be heard. The law in Malaysia clearly states that the sentence of whipping shall not be carried out until the appeal is heard and determined.

Convicted Cannot Be Whipped Until Appeal Heard And Decided

Section 311 of the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code states,  Except in the case of a sentence of whipping (the execution of which shall be stayed pending appeal), no appeal shall operate as a stay of execution, but the Court below or a Judge may stay execution on any judgment, order, conviction or sentence pending appeal, on such terms as to security for the payment of any money or the performance or non-performance of any act or the suffering of any punishment ordered by or in the judgment, order, conviction or sentence as to the Court below or to the Judge may seem reasonable.

For any other sentence, other than whipping, the convicted is required to file an application for stay of execution pending appeal.

Sabri ‘Wrongly’ Convicted Then Wrongly Whipped On 23/6/2022 Before Appeal Heard

On 19/4/2022, the Session Court convicted Sabri for committing the offence pursuant to Section 6(1)( c) Immigration Act 1959/63, and sentenced him to 11 months imprisonment and 5 whippings. He was unrepresented at that time.

Section 6(1)( c) Immigration Act (1) states that. ‘No person other than a citizen shall enter Malaysia unless- (a)…(c) he is in possession of a valid Pass lawfully issued to him to enter Malaysia; or..’

As such, a documented migrant worker like Sabri bin Umar can never reasonably be found guilty of this Section 6(1)( c) Immigration Act offence, for he was a documented migrant worker and his entry and presence in Malaysia were in accordance to law.

A perusal of court documents revealed that the Immigration documents tendered to the court was FALSE, as it stated that there was no records of entry and exit for Sabri. It failed to disclose the truth, that Sabri was indeed a documented migrant worker for the past about 7 years, and that he was in the employ of one Fu Yee Corporation Sdn Bhd in Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia. His work permit also had been renewed by the Immigration Department in 2022, and should reasonably be valid for a year.

In fact, prosecution had also failed in their duty to properly investigate before charging Sabri. An investigation would have revealed that Sabri was documented worker who cannot be charged for a Section 6(1)( c) Immigration Act. It must be pointed out that Sabri was arrested at his workplace on 5/4/2022. There also seem to be no charges against the employer, Fu Yee Corporation, for harboring or employing an undocumented worker.

The appeal to the High Court was filed on or about 22/4/2022, and this appeal has not yet been heard and decided upon. Sabri was wrongly whipped on 23/6/2022.


Migrant Workers and employers that violate worker rights

For a migrant worker, even after his employment agreement comes to an end, the employer has the duty or responsibility to ensure safe return back to the migrant’s country of origin. Hence, even if the immigration work permit/pass that allows for legal presence ends, an employer has the duty to keep the migrant worker safe, including making needed application for pass/permits to allow legal presence in Malaysia until employer can arrange the return to home country.

Some ‘bad’ employers do sometimes wrongfully terminate, and quickly, even forcibly, send migrant workers back to countries of origin. This denies migrant workers access to avenues of justice to pursue claims of wrongful termination and reinstatement, claims for wages/monies still owing by employers to workers and other legal claims. Unfortunately, in Malaysia many of the avenues of justice including labour departments, industrial relation departments and even courts require physical attendance of the complainant/claimant, failing which it assumes that the migrant worker is no longer interested and the process to ensure justice ends.

Some other worse employers may just cause the cancelation of permits, and then may even cause or facilitate migrants to be arrested, charged and convicted for being undocumented, and then deported.

In the case of Sabri Bin Umar, who is also a union member of the Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU), who claims that he was wrongfully terminated by his employer on 4/4/2022, and then was arrested by police on 5/4/2022 and was detained until charged and convicted on 19/4/2022. However, Sabri bin Umar did manage to file a wrongful dismissal claim in the Industrial Relations Department on 19/4/2022 seeking reinstatement, whereby this process is ongoing.

The employer, who knew that Sabri was not an undocumented worker failed to bring to the attention of the police, prosecutors and court this material fact, which reasonably would have meant Sabri would not be charged, let alone be convicted for being illegally in Malaysia under Section 6(1)( c) Immigration Act. Fu Yee Corporation should be doing the needed to end the current serious miscarriage of justice.

Whipping, a Corporal Punishment must be abolished

Sabri’s case has come to light, but there is concern about whether others have been whipped before their appeal is heard and disposed of. Whipping is a corporal punishment that inflicts serious physical and psychological injury, where victims are known to pass out even before the full sentence is carried out.

The Immigration Act 1959/63 was amended and as of August 2002, and the sentence of whipping was introduced for use against undocumented migrants. According to Prisons Department records, 47,914 foreigners were found to have violated the Immigration Act from 2002 to 2008. Of these, 34,923 were whipped.

The Malaysian Bar is unequivocally and unreservedly is against all forms of corporal punishment, including caning or whipping, in accordance with the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“UNCAT”), and international human rights norms. SUHAKAM (Malaysian National Human Rights Commission) has also long recommended that the Government of Malaysia prohibit the use of corporal punishment of caning and whipping.

Therefore, we 

a)    Call for Malaysia to immediately apologize and do the needful to ensure justice be done for the wrongful or illegal whipping of Sabri Bin Umar before his criminal appeal/s is heard and determined, and that actions be taken against those responsible;

b)   Call for the immediate abolition of whipping, a form of corporal punishment in Malaysia.

c)    Call on Malaysia to immediately ratify the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

Charles Hector

Apolinar Z Tolentino, Jr.

 

For and on behalf of the 45 organisations listed below

 

ALIRAN

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia Pacific Region

WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)

Asosasyon ng mga Makabayang Manggagawang Pilipino Overseas (AMMPO) in Malaysia

Black Women for Wages for Housework

Citizens Against Enforced Disappearances, CAGED

Civil Society Action Committee

Domestic Caretaker Union (DCU), Taoyuan City. Taiwan

Federasi SERBUK, Indonesia

Federasi Serikat Buruh Kehutanan Perkayuan dan Pertanian Serikat Buruh Sejahtera Indonesia (HUKATAN)

Federation of Indonesia Workers’ Awakening (FKUI)

Haiti Action Committee

Hong Kong Federation of Asian Domestic Workers Unions, Hong Kong

International Domestic Workers Federation (IDWF)

International Women's Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific, Malaysia

Japan Innocence and Death Penalty Information Center (jiadep.org)

Koalisi Buruh Migran Berdaulat, Indonesia

Labour Law Reform Coalition(LRRC), Malaysia

Malay Forest Officers Union (MFOU), Malaysia

Malaysian Trade Union Congress Sarawak (MTUC – Sarawak), Malaysia

Migrant Care, Indonesia

Migrant Forum in Asia (MFA)

National Union of Transport Equipment & Allied Industries Workers, Malaysia

Network of Action For Migrants in Malaysia(NAMM)

North South Initiative(NSI)

Persatuan Pekerja Rumah Tangga Indonesia Migran (PERTIMIG), Malaysia.

Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor (PSWS), Malaysia

Sabah Plantation Industry Employees Union (SPIEU)

Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU)

Sarawak Bank Employees Union (SBEU), Malaysia

Sarawak Dayak Iban Association

SETEM Catalunya,Spain

Singapore Anti Death Penalty Campaign

Scalabrini International Migration Network (SIMN)

Sedane Labour Resources Centre, Indonesia

South Africa Domestic Service and Allied Workers Union (SADSAWU), South Africa

Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy

The Cross-Regional Center for Refugees and Migrants, Lebanon

The William Gomes Podcast, United Kingdom

Timber Employees Union of Peninsular Malaysia (TEUPM)

TIEUS (Timber Industry Employee Union Sarawak)

United Domestic Workers of the Philippines , Philippines

Union of Forestry Employees Sarawak (UFES), Malaysia

Women of Color/ Global Women’s Strike

 

 

 

Saturday, July 16, 2022

Anti-Hopping laws - it is about VOTER rights - has it been hijacked by political parties?

The main issue about the need for anti-hopping laws was to protect VOTER or people's rights - the right to be represented by a person of their CHOICE as their MP or ADUNs...so, if a BN or PH or PAS MP changes parties after elections, voters get to vote again to choose the NEW MP - which may also be the same old MP again...or not.

Simple, when an elected MP or ADUN, after elections change parties, then the people wanted the right to DECIDE whether we still want the same person to continue to be their MP or ADUN - so, what we needed was simply automatic disqualification, where a by-election and the people get a right to VOTE again(with of course the 'party hopper' having the chance to contest as well) - and then we will see who the people of the particular constituency wants as their MP or ADUN.

AZMIN ALI - after he left the Pakatan Harapan to join BN and be part of the PN government, the question is whether the people of his constituency wants him still to be their Member of Parliament...after he left PH parties and joined another?

What exactly is the draft Anti-Hopping Bill's contents? We do not know...maybe the PN and BN, and even the different parties know...but we. the people are still in the DARK...

The worry is that the Anti-Hopping Bill, its very purpose, MAY be changed and may now be about protecting POLITICAL PARTIES - and giving parties more 'CONTROL' over the MPs or ADUNs who stood as candidates of their party during elections... In short, it may have shifted from protection of VOTER's RIGHTS to some other thing... 

The Secrecy behind the draft BILL is of great concern ...the fear is that the BILL will be tabled and passed fast without even the opportunity for the people's participation...or protest. Unlike other BILLs, this Bill must involve the people directly - and just the MP(the Elected Reps after GE 14 - noting that a lot of them are 'Party Hoppers' - will the party hopper MPs be excluded from the voting, as these party hopper MPs may really be no more the CHOICE of their constituents be their 'wakil rakyat' in Parliament)

What needed to be done was simple, as per the Malaysian Bar Resolution - i.e. a Constitutional Amendment of the provision dealing with the disqualification of MPs

The Malaysian Bar Resolution in 2021 proposed the Malaysian Constitution be amended as follows:-

13. As, it is the Federal Constitution, being Article 48 Disqualification for membership of Parliament, that need to be amended, specifically Art. 48(1) to add on 2 additional situation that results in disqualification. being a new clause (g) and (h)

48 (1) Subject to the provisions of this Article, a person is disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if -

(a) he is and has been found or declared to be of unsound mind; or

(b) he is an undischarged bankrupt; or

(c) he holds an office of profit; or

(d) having been nominated for election to either House of Parliament or to the Legislative Assembly of a State, or having acted as election agent to a person so nominated, he has failed to lodge any return of election expenses required by law within the time and in the manner so required; or

(e) he has been convicted of an offence by a court of law in the Federation (or, before Malaysia Day, in the territories comprised in the State of Sabah or Sarawak or in Singapore) and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than one year or to a fine of not less than two thousand ringgit and has not received a free pardon; or

(f) he has voluntarily acquired citizenship of, or exercised rights of citizenship in, any country outside the Federation or has made a declaration of allegiance to any country outside the Federation.

(g) If he or she joins another party or leaves the party and decides to remain an Independent member; or

(h) If a member was elected as an independent and joins a party
This proposal is similar to what Uganda has....

 in Uganda in Article(83) of their Constitution, where it is stated that ‘…a Member of Parliament may lose his or her seat in any of the following instances—

               - On resignation in writing to the Speaker;
               - If he or she subsequently ceases to qualify to be a Member of Parliament;
               - If he or she is absent from 15 sittings without permission of the Speaker;
               - If he or she is found guilty of violation of the Leadership Code of Conduct;
- If he or she joins another party or leaves the party and decides to remain an Independent member;
- If a member was elected as an independent and joins a party; or
               - On appointment as a public officer….

What is the BILL to be tabled really? Is it an amended Constitution (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2022 that will rightly amend Article 48 of the Federal Constitution? Will it be another different Bill?

Note, unless Art 48 is amended - no MP can be effectively disqualified by some other ordinary Act of Parliament?

The AG knows this ...the government knows this - so will it just be a 'SHOW' - which then will be delayed ...we shall see...

 

 

 

 

 See earlier related post:-

Automatic Elections if MP hops to another party? If still enjoy confidence of people, they will get elected again?

Resigning MPs/ADUNs by reason of 'party hopping' must have right to re-contest in by-election that follows

'Lompat Party'/ Party Hoping Motion to be discussed at Bar EGM

Anti-Hopping laws for people - NOT for party to 'enslave' or gag further their members who are MPs? Malaysian Bar Resolution

Automatic Elections if MP hops to another party? If still enjoy confidence of people, they will get elected again?

Party Hopping Bill will not end deprival of voter rights, unless Art. 48 of Constitution amended - disqualifying MPs that change parties after election

 

Cabinet approves draft anti-hopping Bill, to be tabled in Parliament Monday, says law minister

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Parliament and Law) Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar reiterated the government’s commitment for the second reading of the draft Bill to be held on July 27 and 28, subject to the discretion of the Speaker. — Picture by Shafwan Zaidon
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Parliament and Law) Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar reiterated the government’s commitment for the second reading of the draft Bill to be held on July 27 and 28, subject to the discretion of the Speaker. — Picture by Shafwan Zaidon
 

KUALA LUMPUR, July 14 — The Cabinet has approved a draft anti-hopping Bill that is scheduled for tabling in Parliament on Monday, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Parliament and Law) Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar said today.

“The Cabinet meeting held yesterday had no objections and unanimously approved the draft of the Bill,” he said in a statement here today.

An official letter has been submitted to Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Azhar Azizan Harun for the draft of the Constitution (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2022 to be laid on the tables of MPs for reference in line with Dewan Rakyat Standing Order 60, he said.

Wan Junaidi reiterated the government’s commitment for the second reading of the draft bill to be held on July 27 and 28, subject to the discretion of the Speaker.

He also said that the special select committee set up to review the Bill has finalised and confirmed amendments made to the draft report. — Bernama, Malay Mail, 14/7/2022

Anti-party hopping Bill among highlights in Parliament meeting starting July 18


  • Nation
  • Friday, 15 Jul 2022

KUALA LUMPUR: The tabling of the anti-party hopping Bill will be the focus of the Second Meeting of the Fifth Session of the 14th Parliament which will be for three weeks beginning this Monday (July 18).

The draft of the Constitution (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2022 and on provisions prohibiting Members of Parliament (MPs) from party-hopping will be laid on the table of the MPs this Monday for their reference.

ALSO READ: Anti-hopping law could be in force by Sept 2, says Wan Junaidi

According to Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Parliament and Law) Datuk Seri Dr Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar, in a statement two days ago, the bill is proposed for debate on July 27 and 28, subject to the discretion of the Dewan Rakyat Speaker.

Prior to that, he said, engagement session by the Legal Affairs Division and the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) with government MPs will be held on July 25 and with the opposition MPs on July 26.

Once passed by the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara, the bill will be presented to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong between Aug 11 and 26 for His Majesty’s consent and then to be sent for gazette between Aug 29 and Sept 2.

The bill was among the matters agreed upon in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on Transformation and Political Stability signed between the federal government and Pakatan Harapan in September last year as a form of bipartisan cooperation which upholds the spirit of the Malaysian Family (Keluarga Malaysia).

The issue on living cost is also expected to be a topic of discussion at this coming sitting, especially with PAS having proposed for a special Parliament session to be held to discuss the matter.

However, Wan Junaidi was reported to have said that there was no need to hold the special session as the MPs could submit motions on the issue during the Dewan Rakyat sitting to be held until Aug 4.

Meanwhile, nine bills are expected to be tabled at this Parliament session for the second and third reading.

They are the National Forestry (Amendment) Bill 2022, Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases (Amendment) Bill 2021, Offenders Compulsory Attendance (Amendment) Bill 2021, Anti-Sexual Harassment Bill 2021, the Malaysian Border Security Agency (Dissolution) Bill 2021, Poisons (Amendment) Bill 2022, Control of Padi and Rice (Amendment) Bill 2022, East Coast Economic Region Development Council (Amendment) Bill 2022 and the Independent Police Conduct Commission (IPCC) Bill.

The coming Parliament sitting will also see whether there would be an election for the post of Dewan Rakyat Deputy Speaker to replace Pengerang Member of Parliament Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said.

On Aug 23 last year, Azalina resigned from the post but continued to temporarily shoulder the responsibility of Deputy Speaker throughout the meeting of that session.

During the sitting on Oct 25, Wan Junaidi told the Dewan Rakyat that the election of Deputy Speaker would be postponed to the next meeting.

According to Wan Junaidi, the motion on this matter was originally listed under an Order Paper of the Second Meeting of the Fourth Session but was postponed to enable amendments to be made to Article 57 (1)(b) of the Federal Constitution to increase the number of Deputy Speakers from two to three.

Article 57 (1)(b) of the Federal Constitution states that the Dewan Rakyat shall from time to time elect two Deputy Speakers from among members of the House.

The coming Parliament session will also see Minister of Plantation Industries and Commodities Datuk Zuraida Kamaruddin, who announced leaving Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia last May 26, attending as a Parti Bangsa Malaysia (PBM) representative.

Two other PBM representatives in the house are Julau MP Larry Soon @ Larry Sng Wei Shien and Tebrau MP Steven Choong Shiau Yoon.

With the Parliament session next week to be held during the transition to endemic phase, members of the house and staff will be required to adhere to the stipulated standard operating procedures (SOP), including wearing face mask in the building, but they no longer need to undergo Covid-19 test twice a week as was required during the last sitting. - Bernama, Star, 15/7/2022