ON HUMAN RIGHTS, JUSTICE AND PEACE ISSUES, LABOUR RIGHTS, MIGRANT RIGHTS, FOR THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY, TOWARDS AN END OF TORTURE, POLICE ABUSES, DISCRIMINATION...
Maybe GOOD INTENTION but the means of giving AID raises doubts/questions - WAS this program to help certain to help certain Businesses? To help certain BRANDS?
Financial AID is akin giving alms to a beggar or the poor - it is a short term immediate response which does not solve the problem.
SARA money is deposited in the National Registration Identity Card(IC)/Kad Pengenalan(KP), and Malaysians can only utilize this money(financial assistance) only at SELECTED shops ... to buy goods from selected BRANDS using the money in the IC/KP, they have to go to selected shops only (not all) - so this result in a SERIOUS problem to the small sundry shops, that are already suffering with the emergence of supermarkets/Hypermarkets/Mini Mart chains, and now Anwar Ibrahim's MADANI government has maybe 'placed the last nail on the coffin' - further killing these small sundry shops or small establishment that sells sundry items that now exist in every town, Taman and even kampungs... these small shops are usually businesses of those in the B40 group (and lower M40 group).
Small sundry shop's customers have to go to some SELECTED shop to be able to buy sundry items with money in MyKad --- will small sundry shops lose customers?
NO reason why SELECTED businesses only - because the government already has a list of all shops(small and big) that are involved in the sundry business - they need Local Government permits to legally operate.
But, other problem is that the small sundry shops may also not have the EQUIPMENT to read the MyKad?
NEXT issue - the selected products > do all Brands that produce the said product/item get the same 'preference' - that you can buy using the money in your MyKad? This we need to investigate. If NO, why? Is the government giving preferential treatment for some Brands produced by certain companies?
In Malaysia, SARA (Sumbangan Asas Rahmah) is a government aid program where funds, often in one-off amounts like RM100, are credited directly to your MyKad (Malaysian Identity Card) for purchasing essential items at participating stores, with no registration needed for adult citizens to receive it; you check eligibility and balance via the official SARA portal or MyKasih portal. The MyKad acts as the payment method, allowing you to buy necessities like groceries and personal care items by just bringing your card to designated merchants
Meanwhile, Anwar said Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) monthly recipients will receive RM200 in their IC beginning Jan 9. -Star, 5/1/2026
The Sara cash assistance can be used to purchase necessities in 14
product categories at about 4,100 participating premises nationwide.
If a consumer has to go to some bigger shops/supermarkets to use the government assistance in their Identity Card to buy items, they will also buy other items too that are not covered by the SARA scheme?
It would have been BETTER to just transfer the money into the recipient's Bank Account - so he can spend at whichever shop, and buy whatever brands?
Ministry of Domestic Trade and Costs of Living must INVESTIGATE - as we are also concerned about the well-being of small sundry shops, and other Malaysian brand products..
Last year, only 69% used the money deposited > thus Anwar's MADANI government FAILED to help the poor - about 31% never utilized this 'aid' - So, is the government giving AID effectively or not (if directly banked into Bank accounts it would have been 100% utilized??? Give AID means GIVE - do not take it back if the recipients not used it please.
“Last year, 69% of Malaysians used STR, and that was nearly RM2.1bil,” he[Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim] said.
This is proof that money disbursed for AID effectively was never used by the intended recipients - 31% never used it? Would it not have been more EFFECTIVE AID if the said monies were directly banked into the BANK accounts of the intended recipients.
What will happen to money not used - go back to the government? AID DELIVERY mechanism BAD and ...and raises question of whether it was to help certain BIG and Medium-sized businesses, be it them 'selected participating stores' or maybe just certain BRANDS that market the selected products which the Aid money could buy..Were some other companies that produced the same/similar products excluded? Were these also Malaysian businesses - note that some of the current 'participating stores' maybe are owned by foreigners > not 100% Malaysians.
Of course a supermarket or a shop, at present, are not required to make available products from ALL brands/companies - as such many even Malaysian companies that produce said products are kept out of consumer market...That maybe a RIGHT of retailers - but detrimental to other producers and the consumer too. Should we have a LAW requiring all supermarkets and big Shops to place all products from all Malaysian companies...especially LOCAL companies. Take COFFEE, there are many local companies producing coffee but we do not see them in most supermarkets and big shops... so consumers find it hard to buy these LOCAL products...
NEXT questions - how much did the said 'SELECTED Business' benefit more by reason of the money in the MyKad?
Before the MyKad Sara Aid and now - how many new consumers that came to their business premises, how much new business and profits from such new consumers - DID Anwar's MADANI government just improve the business/profits of these participating outlets - which translate a LOSS of business to the Local Malaysian small businesses(who are still not listed as 'participating stores') As mentioned earlier, all businesses including shops that sell sundry/healthcare/etc are all registered with the government at the relevant Local Councils - so NO problem for getting the FULL LIST of all these shops/Stores???
Another problem using money in MyKad - the stores need the necessary equipment to scan the MyKad to get the money - this is ADDED cost which many small sundry shops/shops simply cannot afford. Note that most small shops still only accept CASH only, and some may accept payment if you scan QR code and make payments. Most shops do not even have the equipment needed to allow one to pay by Credit or Debit cards yet...and prefer not to simply because then money does not immediately come to them, but need to be obtained later from the relevant Card company.. So, CASH or scan QR codes that money immediately goes into your bank account is PREFFERED and BEST for the poorer businesses.
SO, BEST solution is DIRECT Transfer of the AID into the personal bank accounts of the Receipients
No more, TRANSFER Aid into MyKad, and if you do not spend, the Government may or will take it back.. IF YOU WANT TO GIVE AID, GIVE IT AND NOT USE A DIFFICULT WAY FOR PEOPLE TO USE IT.
WHAT IS THE BEST METHOD TO ASSIST THE POOR?
During the Najib ERA - he used the 1Malaysia Shops and the 1Malaysia products - Who got the 1Malaysia shops(which ultimately failed to attract customers), and the right to produce or package these 1Malaysia products(problem was that the consumer does not simply buy products but also considers the BRAND, the manufacturers and also personal taste/preference). Even rice, there are so many different BRANDS - and customers pick the Brands they like/prefer - CHOICE). That was why the 1Malaysia method failed.
With Anwar and his MADANI government, it is the SARA Aid - but again it is for SELECTED products. selected stores, and maybe also 'selected' Brands -
The best option, in my opinion, is PRICE CONTROL for basic items - RICE, Floor, Cooking Oil, Cooking Gas, Chicken, Eggs, Milk, Selected Local Vegetables, Onion, Garlic, Chili, - This will the BASIC items that people need to have a healthy life in Malaysia. The PRICE will be such that the poorest can afford. Even if the RICH buys, it does not matter as many rich generally will buy more expensive stuff.
If you want a TARGETED approach where the RICH or those who can afford will not benefit from aid to the poor and needy, then do the following
* No SCHOLARSHIP or maybe GOVERNMENT Education LOAN for the RICH for they can certainly afford higher education overseas and even in Malaysia. (Anwar talked about removing subsidies for the rich when they went for HAJ - but since then, there is NO mention of anything else including no more government scholarship or student loans, etc for the RICH - the T20 and the upper middle class that can afford. No houses for the poor, ...
MERE AID to help the poor does not ELIMINATE the problem - better a better solution that may be giving them jobs/skills so that they can earn an income - IT is more dignified than aid or alms that are given time after time...
RM100 Sara aid to be credited beginning Feb 9, says PM
PUTRAJAYA: The RM100 Bantuan Sumbangan Asas Rahmah
(Sara) will be credited to all adult citizens aged 18 and above
beginning Feb 9, says Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
“This
is for Ramadan preparations and this year’s Chinese New Year,” said
Anwar during his speech at a special monthly address in Putrajaya on
Monday (Jan 5).
Meanwhile, Anwar said Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) monthly recipients will receive RM200 in their IC beginning Jan 9.
For the first phase of STR payments, RM500 will be credited into the accounts of eligible Malaysians
“Last year, 69% of Malaysians used STR, and that was nearly RM2.1bil,” he said.
The
Sara cash assistance can be used to purchase necessities in 14 product
categories at about 4,100 participating premises nationwide.
Anwar said the RM150 early schooling aid would be credited on Jan 13 to students up to Form Six.
“Make sure that the money is spent on your children,” added Anwar.
Anwar said this aid cost the government about RM800mil in allocations.
When
tabling Budget 2026 in Oct last year, Anwar had said the early
schooling aid would benefit 5.2 million pupils from Standard One to Form
Five in government schools.
NOW, threat that FIFA will take over FAM - 'full takeover by a FIFA-appointed normalisation
committee"
Haresh
Deol, a prominent football pundit and editor at local news outlet
Twentytwo13, said it was "the biggest scandal in the country after
1Malaysia Development Berhad"
FIFA highlighted Malaysia's Football Scandal, and it also raised a Citizenship Scandal and also the possibility of government involvement in FRAUD - in the documents submitted by Malaysia.
The issues of concern for Malaysians > How did the said foreign players become Malaysian citizens? It is very difficult for them to acquire citizenship? Citizenship is a major concern as many deserving still have not been given citizenship - the Stateless, the Bajau Laut - and many others? Did they reside in Malaysia for 10 years and continue to reside in Malaysia? Did they relinquish the citizenship of other nations - Malaysia generally does not allow dual citizenship..The HOME Minister is responsible - till now, the government seem to have ignored investigating this issue - the CONDITIONS are mandatory, and the Minister has no power to exempt anyone from satisfying this conditions/requirement - although he
The issue that FIFA is concerned with is different. FIFA does not want its member countries to simple make foreigners citizens so that they can play for the country. So, FIFA requires something additional, that is either a grandparent or parent was born in Malaysia > and here FAM allegedly submitted documents to prove this birth in Malaysia, and WHO can issue this kind of documentary PROOF, if not the HOME Ministry...so, the allegations is also an allegation against the Malaysian Government - and FIFA suggested criminal action against perpetrators - but, as far as I know, still nothing that is publicly made known yet..
Football Association of Malaysia(FAM) comes directly under the Sports Minister - The Malaysian government and/or the Ministry should have commenced investigation to determine the TRUTH as soon as they became aware of the complaint lodged in JUNE 2025....still PM Anwar's MADANI government is not taking action including FIFA's recommendation that criminal action be taken that those who committed FRAUD???
*Complaint received by FIFA on June 11 2025 prompted the world football body
to open an investigation into the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM)
and the seven heritage players.
26/9/2025 - Fifa Disciplinary Committee rules against FAM(Malaysia) - and imposes punishment.
Early November
2025, FIFA’s Appeal Committee rejected that appeal in full, upholding
both the fines and the bans
NOW, threat that FIFA will take over FAM - 'full takeover by a FIFA-appointed normalisation
committee"
In November last year, FIFA's appeals committee dismissed appeals
from FAM and seven naturalised players - Gabriel Palmero, Facundo
Garces, Rodrigo Holgado, Imanol Machuca, Joao Figueiredo, Jon Irazabal
and Hector Hevel - who were found to have breached Article 22 of the
disciplinary code, relating to the forgery and falsification of
documents.
FIFA's disciplinary committee had earlier ordered FAM to pay a
CHF350,000 (RM1.8 million) fine, while each of the seven players
received a CHF2,000 (RM10,600) fine and a 12-month ban from all
football-related activities.
FIFA also forfeited Malaysia's results in three international
friendly matches last year, awarding 3-0 victories to their opponents -
Cape Verde, Singapore and Palestine.
In addition, FAM was ordered to pay a further CHF10,000 (approximately RM51,414) fine.
Further trouble could lie ahead for Harimau Malaya, with the AFC
expected to deduct points from their 2027 Asian Cup qualifying campaign,
as FAM await the outcome of their appeal to the Court of Arbitration
for Sport (CAS) over FIFA's sanctions on the association and the seven
heritage players.
MOST Disappointing the Minister responsible for Sports, when the issue was raised to FIFA > when a reasonable appropriate response was a SPEEDY investigation to VERIFY the truth/falsehood of the allegations, and to immediately TAKE NEEDED ACTION against all wrongdoers.. BUT our Minister(and the Government) sadly decided to side with FAM(Football Association of Malaysia) and waited until FIFA decided.
After FIFA decided against - the Minister(and Government) decided to wait for the outcome of the Appeal.. and the Appeal confirmed the earlier FIFA decision.
NOW, what wait for FAM taking FIFA to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)???
Same with 1MDB Scandal - it WAS first denied by the Malaysian AG/PP that it was a CRIME.
Is PM Anwar and the MADANI government still in denial that FAM, possibly some Government Ministries committed a CRIME - as the creation of fraudulent documents is certainly a crime > now known by so many countries, if not all members of FIFA.
IT IS A GREAT SHAME - Why does Anwar and the Government still try to 'believe' that Malaysia and FAM is innocent? Why still no serious investigation to find the perpetrators of the crime, that most probably involved the Home Ministry or officers therein - the generating of documents claiming that parent/grandparent born in Malaysia...
Is this foreign, now Malaysians, receiving SARA Aid as well? Will they be VOTING in the next elections...
Can the government set up an INDEPENDENT team or even a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate whether CITIZENSHIP was granted in accordance with LAW, and all mandatory conditions was satisfied - Was it an abuse of power by the Home Minister, wrongly believing that he can make any foreigner a Malaysian?
1MDB was exposed mainly by foreigners - and the FIFA related wrongs was exposed by FIFA. Who lodged the complaint is irrelevant - FIFA made its decision, and since nothing is happening in Malaysia, Malaysian football is at risk of being taken over by a FIFA-appointed normalisation
committee
Aysha Ridzuan, a sport consultant who previously worked for FAM, said the win against Vietnam was "huge for the fans"."[But]
as fans, we would probably rather lose … than win like this — having
players who are not supposed to play for us," she said.
"Presenting
fraudulent documentation with the purpose of gaining eligibility to
play for a national team constitutes, pure and simple, a form of
cheating," it said."The act of forgery strikes at the very core of the fundamental principles of football."Not
only those governing a player's eligibility to represent a national
team, but also the essential values of a clean sport and the principle
of fair play," FIFA concluded.
The committee said they were unable to determine the mastermind
behind the falsification due to several constraints, including the lack
of cooperation from the certifying notary public and the inability to
locate the seven players’ two agents, Nicolas Puppo and Frederico
Moraes.In line with FIFA’s written explanation to FAM last month, the IIC have recommended that a police report be lodged.“The IIC could not conclusively determine who falsified the disputed documents. - FAM's Independent Investigation Committee (IIC)
CRIME confirmed - but still no one charged in court. I believe that the Minister responsible for Sports, and the Prime Minister should also be criminally liable for their failure to prevent this crime in Malaysian sports - What do you think?
CITIZENSHIP Issue - is a Parliamentary Select Committee even investigating this?
FAM exco set for mass resignation to avoid FIFA takeover [WATCH]
KUALA
LUMPUR: In what is being described as a "strategic retreat" to
safeguard the future of Malaysian football, the FA of Malaysia (FAM)
executive committee is expected to tender a collective resignation as early as next week.
Sources close to the governing body said the move is a calculated
attempt to prevent a full takeover by a FIFA-appointed normalisation
committee.
By stepping down voluntarily, the current leadership aims to initiate
an internal "cleansing" process, allowing a temporary committee to
oversee a fresh extraordinary election congress.
"The goal is to show FIFA and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) that FAM is capable of self-correction," a source said.
"If the exco stays and a suspension is imposed, FAM loses all
control. By resigning now, they are effectively hitting the reset button
on their own terms."
The decision follows a meeting held two weeks ago, where 13 executive
committee members weighed the risks of international isolation.
While a small group initially resisted the proposal, consensus
eventually shifted towards a "mass sacrifice" to protect the future of
the domestic league and the national team.
A press conference to announce the transition is expected by Jan 28.
Previously, AFC had suggested that the FAM exco step down to avoid
suspension, which would otherwise result in the association being
temporarily administered by FIFA and the continental body.
In November last year, FIFA's appeals committee dismissed appeals
from FAM and seven naturalised players - Gabriel Palmero, Facundo
Garces, Rodrigo Holgado, Imanol Machuca, Joao Figueiredo, Jon Irazabal
and Hector Hevel - who were found to have breached Article 22 of the
disciplinary code, relating to the forgery and falsification of
documents.
FIFA's disciplinary committee had earlier ordered FAM to pay a
CHF350,000 (RM1.8 million) fine, while each of the seven players
received a CHF2,000 (RM10,600) fine and a 12-month ban from all
football-related activities.
FIFA also forfeited Malaysia's results in three international
friendly matches last year, awarding 3-0 victories to their opponents -
Cape Verde, Singapore and Palestine.
In addition, FAM was ordered to pay a further CHF10,000 (approximately RM51,414) fine.
Further trouble could lie ahead for Harimau Malaya, with the AFC
expected to deduct points from their 2027 Asian Cup qualifying campaign,
as FAM await the outcome of their appeal to the Court of Arbitration
for Sport (CAS) over FIFA's sanctions on the association and the seven
heritage players.
Malaysia had also fielded ineligible players in their 2-0 win over
Nepal on March 25 and the 4-0 victory against Vietnam on June 10. - NST, 21/1/2026
How Malaysia’s Naturalization Scandal Reached Its Familiar Ending
When
FIFA’s ruling was finally made public in late September 2025, it felt
less like a bombshell and more like the inevitable conclusion to a saga
that had been quietly building for months. The Football Association of
Malaysia was fined heavily, seven naturalized players were handed
12-month bans, and Malaysian football once again found itself under an
uncomfortable global spotlight. What caught attention was not the
severity of the punishment, but its direction.
As FAM absorbed the full weight of
FIFA’s sanctions, Tunku Ismail Sultan Ibrahim—the most influential
figure in the country’s football landscape—remained notably untouched.
That imbalance would come to define the affair.
The origins of the controversy did
not lie in the second half of 2025, but earlier that year. Malaysia’s
aggressive push to fast-track naturalized players had already gathered
pace by early 2025, with several foreign-born players claiming Malaysian
heritage being cleared to represent the national team. By June 2025,
seven such players had featured together in competitive fixtures, most
notably in Malaysia’s emphatic 4-0 victory over Vietnam in the
qualifiers for the 2027 AFC Asian Cup.
At the time, their eligibility
appeared settled. FIFA had initially indicated that the documents
submitted by FAM suggested the players were eligible. Public scrutiny
was minimal, and the results on the pitch only added momentum to the
project.
That changed almost immediately.
On 11 June 2025, a formal complaint
was lodged with FIFA questioning the authenticity of the documentation
used to establish Malaysian lineage for the players. What had previously
been a background murmur suddenly became an official investigation.
FIFA opened disciplinary proceedings, re-examining documents that had
earlier passed preliminary checks.
The process moved largely out of
public view until 26 September 2025, when FIFA’s Disciplinary Committee
delivered its verdict. The documents submitted by FAM were found to be
falsified or misleading. Under FIFA’s strict-liability framework, intent
was irrelevant. Responsibility lay with the association that filed the
paperwork. FAM was fined CHF 350,000, while the seven players were
banned from all football activity for 12 months.
FAM appealed. In early November
2025, FIFA’s Appeal Committee rejected that appeal in full, upholding
both the fines and the bans. Only then did the matter move toward the
Court of Arbitration for Sport.
On paper, the issue was resolved.
But Malaysian football rarely operates purely on paper.
The naturalization drive was not an
accidental administrative overreach. It was part of a broader strategy
to accelerate Malaysia’s competitiveness, a strategy publicly
articulated and defended by TMJ well before the sanctions were imposed.
Throughout the first half of 2025, he spoke openly about the need for
Malaysia to be more ambitious, to stop lagging behind regional rivals,
and to fully exploit legal pathways to strengthen the national team.
He approved candidate pools. He
defended the inclusion of naturalized players when doubts were raised.
And when FIFA’s sanctions were confirmed in September 2025, he stepped
forward once more, offering to personally finance FAM’s legal challenge
to CAS, stressing that no public funds would be used.
Yet when consequences were handed out, they stopped short of him.
From a legal standpoint, the
explanation was straightforward. TMJ did not sign the eligibility
documents. He did not submit files to FIFA. He did not hold a formal
administrative role within FAM when the documentation was lodged. FIFA’s
disciplinary system is designed to sanction associations, not
influential figures operating outside official structures. From Zurich’s
perspective, FAM alone fit the criteria for punishment.
Still, anyone who followed
Malaysian football closely in 2024 and 2025 understood that authority
did not always align neatly with job titles.
In many footballing environments,
an individual who shapes strategy so decisively would be expected to
share responsibility when that strategy collapses. In Malaysia, that
expectation shifts the moment royalty enters the equation. TMJ is framed
less as an executive actor and more as a patron—someone who guides and
pushes, but does not formally decide. It is a subtle distinction, yet
one that carries enormous weight when accountability is assigned.
That distinction also shaped how the story was told.
In the weeks following FIFA’s
ruling in late September and October 2025, criticism of FAM was blunt
and unrelenting. Questions of governance, compliance failures, and
internal oversight dominated the conversation. Discussion of TMJ’s role,
by contrast, was measured and indirect, often folded into broader
debates about systems and structures rather than individual
responsibility. Administrators understood the limits. Journalists
understood the sensitivities. FAM itself had little incentive to
redirect blame upward, knowing that admitting external influence could
trigger further scrutiny from FIFA.
So responsibility settled where it most often does: with the institution least able to deflect it.
FIFA, meanwhile, showed no
inclination to look beyond the association. Sanctioning FAM resolved the
matter efficiently. Pursuing an influential royal figure would have
taken the issue well beyond football, and FIFA has historically shown
little appetite for that kind of confrontation. In this case, governance
was about containment, not escalation.
This does not mean TMJ emerged
entirely untouched in the court of public opinion. By late 2025, the
naturalization project was already being discussed more cautiously, its
ambition reframed as a gamble that failed. Among supporters, the sense
that accountability flowed in only one direction was difficult to
ignore. Yet experience suggests that controversies linked to powerful
figures in Malaysian football tend to fade, remembered as failed
experiments rather than personal reckonings.
What remains is the pattern.
Influence in Malaysian football
often exists without liability. Ambition advances without consequence.
When initiatives succeed, credit flows upward. When they collapse,
responsibility falls downward. This scandal did not create that
imbalance—it simply exposed it more clearly than most.
In the end, this was never just
about seven players or documents submitted in March and June 2025 and
re-examined months later. It was about how the system decides who must
answer when ambition outruns governance.
And once again, the conclusion followed a familiar script.
Malaysian football in chaos after FIFA suspends national players from Argentina, Spain and Brazil
By Max Walden
Topic:Soccer
Five of the seven foreign-born players who have been suspended by FIFA. (AFP: Mohd Rasfan/ABC News Graphic: Jarrod Fankhauser)
In short:
Global
football's governing body FIFA has found Malaysia "cheated" by forging
documentation to improperly naturalise foreign players from South
America and Europe.
While the international players' union says the seven players are "victims", FIFA has imposed a 12-month suspension on them.
What's next?
FIFA
has lodged criminal complaints in five countries and launched its own
investigation into the Football Association of Malaysia.
It has been a year of intense highs and bitter lows in football-mad Malaysia.
The
men's national team, which has only qualified for four Asian Cup
tournaments in its history, thrashed Vietnam 4-0 in a June qualifier for
the region's top international competition.
"2027 Asian Cup, we're coming in style," a fan gushed on social media.
"This is our time," they declared.
Yet
days after the victory, the sport's governing body FIFA received a
formal complaint about several star players' eligibility to represent
Malaysia.
Brazilian-born Joao Figueiredo, playing for Malaysia in June, has been suspended from football-related activities. (AP: Vincent Thian)
Many
of those on the field were so-called "heritage players" — people
ostensibly with Malaysian ancestry naturalised as citizens in order to
represent the South-East Asian nation.
It soon emerged that five of the players who faced Vietnam had only been granted citizenship the week before kick off.
Another two had become Malaysians in the months prior.
'Cheating … pure and simple'
An
investigation by FIFA found the men's grandparents were not born in
Malaysia as claimed, but rather Spain, Argentina, Brazil and the
Netherlands.
The players whose
family heritage was in question were Spanish-born Gabriel Palmera and
Jon Irazabal; Facundo Garces, Rodrigo Holgado and Imanol Machuca born in
Argentina; Brazil-born Joao Figueiredo; and Hector Hevel who was born
in the Netherlands.
A table from FIFA's report shows where the footballers' grandparents were born in falsified versus original documentation. (ABC News: Jarrod Fankhauser)
FIFA
alleged the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) had "doctored"
documents in order to field the players, who it concluded were the
"ultimate beneficiaries" and "illegally, and successfully enjoyed the
consequences".
All seven
players were slapped with a 12-month suspension from football-related
activities and individual fines of around $3,800.
FAM was ordered to pay a fine of 350,000 Swiss francs ($663,000) to FIFA.
Aysha Ridzuan, a sport consultant who previously worked for FAM, said the win against Vietnam was "huge for the fans".
"[But]
as fans, we would probably rather lose … than win like this — having
players who are not supposed to play for us," she said.
Aysha Ridzuan says Malaysia fans want authorities to tell the truth. (Supplied)
The 63-page report released by FIFA's disciplinary committee was scathing.
"Presenting
fraudulent documentation with the purpose of gaining eligibility to
play for a national team constitutes, pure and simple, a form of
cheating," it said.
"The act of forgery strikes at the very core of the fundamental principles of football.
"Not
only those governing a player's eligibility to represent a national
team, but also the essential values of a clean sport and the principle
of fair play," FIFA concluded.
FIFA says the players involved in the naturalisation scandal were the "ultimate beneficiaries" of fraudulent conduct. (Reuters: Arnd Wiegmann, file)
FAM
suspended its general secretary Noor Azman Rahman but blamed an
"administrative error" and maintained the players were "legitimate
Malaysian citizens".
Haresh
Deol, a prominent football pundit and editor at local news outlet
Twentytwo13, said it was "the biggest scandal in the country after
1Malaysia Development Berhad" — referring to the largest corruption case in Malaysian history.
"Many questions, especially those pertaining the so-called forged 'documents', remain unanswered to date," he said.
Union says players are 'victims'
The scandal's consequences for Malaysian football are expected to be painful and long-lasting.
"They'll probably miss out on qualification for the next Asia Cup," said Paul Williams, host of soccer podcast The Asian Game.
"Malaysia
could also be banned from qualifying for the 2031 Asian Cup … which
would be a huge blow to the football system in Malaysia."
The Football Association of Malaysia was fined more than $660,000 by FIFA. (Reuters: Samsul Said, file)
Local
news outlets reported last month that the affected players were
planning to sue FAM for millions in lost income due to the ban.
FAM will appeal FIFA's decision at the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
"We feel someone should just come out and say the truth," Ms Ridzuan said.
FIFPRO, the
international union for soccer players, this week declared that the
12-month sanctions imposed on the players were "grossly
disproportionate".
"All steps
were handled by institutions outside their control, yet they now face
suspension from their clubs and the serious consequences that follow
through no fault of their own," FIFPRO said in a statement.
"It is clear that the players are, in fact, victims in this matter."
Meanwhile, FIFA has lodged criminal complaints in five countries.
"It
is imperative that the relevant authorities are informed so that
appropriate criminal investigations and proceedings may be pursued," it
said.
Malaysian journalist attacked
Deol,
who is also deputy president of Malaysia's National Press Club, was
last week allegedly assaulted by two men on the street in Kuala Lumpur
while another filmed the incident.
Police continue to investigate and have suggested it was a case of mistaken identity.
Malaysian football pundit Haresh Deol says many questions about the naturalisation scandal remain unanswered. (Supplied)
But
Deol told the ABC he believes the attack was intended to intimidate
because of his publication of critical journalism about the
naturalisation scandal.
"I've
been in the industry for 25 years and I can't think of anything else for
this attack but for my series of reporting and commentary on sports
integrity and governance," he said.
In
a forceful column published days before the alleged assault, Deol wrote
that the country's football association had "failed" Malaysians.
"The system is compromised. Sport has been reduced to a personal playground," he said.
"The onus is now on Malaysians to speak up. The demand for integrity, accountability, and transparency must continue." - ABC, 6/12/2025
Is Malaysia and Malaysians against CORRUPTION? Is this MADANI government under Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim against CORRUPTION?
To achieve power, corruption cannot be overlooked - pardoned, non-investigated/prosecuted...simply because 'we need them to be able to stay in power to be able to do some good' arguments.
The Malaysian people rejected the Barisan Nasional/UMNO led-coalition because of CORRUPTION - and they voted Pakatan Harapan(PH) believing this alternative coalition would be different, and will finally not just eradicate corruption but more importantly finally prosecute them that were corrupt..
...Anwar said he is not interested in imprisoning certain individuals but
is more concerned about recovering the country’s misappropriated funds
so they can be returned for the benefit of the people. - Malay Mail, 14/6/2025
It was most disturbing when Anwar said that - as long as they RETURNED was the priority. This cannot be accepted as the perpetrators of crime must be charged, tried and convicted - and this means ALL, including politicians and 'friends' that the government need to protect to stay in power, etc?
Do Malaysians believe in Malaysia's administration of justice - and the finding/decision of courts?
UMNO No. 1, Najib has been convicted...BUT...
Corruption that refuses to go away — Mustafa K. Anuar
Wednesday, 21 Jan 2026 11:00 AM MYT
JANUARY
21 — That corruption is the scourge of society is obvious enough,
especially so when it adversely impacts nation-building and corrodes
social values.
Such transgression has become widespread in our
country over the years, involving leaders, politicians, government
officials and other perpetrators in the private sector.
This
scourge has deeply troubled many Malaysians who are concerned about the
future of the country, arising from the corruption committed by
individuals, particularly politicians who once swore to work for the
benefit of the common people and the country.
Similar concern has also found expression among the Malay rulers.
Recently,
the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku
Munawir expressed his disappointment at people who still supported
individuals who were convicted of corruption.
His Royal Highness rightly reminded us that corruption was “the foremost enemy of justice, trust and the nation’s future”.
Corruption
has become so rampant that certain segments of our society seem to have
acquiesced, giving the impression that corruption is kosher and a part
of our social norms.
Indeed,
as a society, we have crossed the red line to the extent that certain
personalities, who committed graft, appear to be unabashed about it.
Take the case of the 1MDB scandal. “Malu apa, Bossku”
(What is there to be ashamed of, my Boss?) became almost a rallying cry
for fallen prime minister Najib Razak and his diehard supporters.
To be sure, shame has an important value especially in a society where its moral compass urgently needs recalibration.
The integrity of justice is tested when corruption becomes normalised. — Unsplash pic
It
befuddles the scrupulous among us that certain tainted politicians are
still able to gain support from their followers who are predominantly
Muslim. This is ironic, given that Islam doesn’t take kindly to corrupt
practices.
It would appear that such Muslims are inclined to put
more emphasis on strict compliance with Islamic dietary restrictions
than fiercely fighting bribery that is clearly “haram”.
There are
members in Umno, in particular, who exhibit vigour in their relentless
demand that the punishment for their convicted leader be reduced to a
pardon or house arrest.
Is it any wonder, then, why the royal
intervention above on corruption did not seem to get much traction among
certain sections of the political tribe?
It is now public
knowledge that billions of ringgit were squandered in the 1MDB scandal.
This humongous amount of taxpayers’ money could have been spent
prudently for the common good of ordinary Malaysians and the nation.
And
yet despite the colossal consequences of such a scandal, certain
segments of our society, particularly the so-called nationalists among
politicians, were not agitated enough to categorically demand justice
and insist that the perpetrators be duly made to account for the severe
damage that had been done to the nation.
Perak ruler Sultan
Nazrin Shah also made known his deep concern recently regarding certain
sections of the Muslim community who seemed to have lost their moral
compass.
His Royal Highness cautioned the dangers of them
becoming “trapped in materialism, obsessed with status, and intoxicated
by power”.
The latest revelation of financial impropriety, apart
from the sexual kind, involves corruption in the armed forces – which,
incidentally, may also have national security implications.
Our
sense of right and wrong regarding corruption must not be muddied by,
say, an extreme adulation for a particular personality who has already
been found guilty.
In addition, rules must not be allowed to be
bent by those who have the wherewithal, the political connection, and
high social status.
That is why there were people who were deeply
concerned about the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ granting Discharges
Not Amounting to Acquittal (DNAA) to a number of individuals (mainly
politicians) as it was perceived as an act of letting them off the
hook.
Moreover, justice would not be served if there’s one rule
for the elite and another for the ordinary people. Double standards must
not be dressed up as a normal democratic practice.
If corruption is indeed regarded as a terrible scourge to be crushed, it is crucial that we have moral clarity. - Malay Mail, 21/1/2026
If there are existing houses, Temples/Places of Worship, and even farms/plantations on existence for 10 years or more on LANDs that records today show that the LAND belongs to another or State, where there was no previous action by State and/or owners to CLAIM illegality and insist end of encroachment/trespass, then the the users/occupiers have the LEGITIMATE right to claim ownership, and/or CONSENT of State/owners of the said occupation, and the Government must do all that is necessary to ensure OWNERSHIP of the said properties be transferred to the said home owners, worshipers at said religious places, or farmers that cultivate said land.
The STATE is duty bound to prevent illegal occupation and/or usage of said land - and the failure of speedy enforcement will give the said 'illegal' occupants and/or users a LEGITIMATE belief of APPROVAL by State and/or 'legitimate' owners - more so when the activities are known and allowed to continue.
In the case of the MADANI Mosque issue, the TEMPLE in question is located in the middle of town - and it was allowed to be built and exist by the then British Colonial government, and historical documents may prove State approval. Only on MERDEKA(Independence) was the Land transferred to the Malaysian government - who should have 'corrected' legal ownership - recognizing homes, places of worship, etc... and here again the said Temple continued to exist and function for more than 60 YEARS - and the State did nothing to even claim that the TEMPLE was illegal??? Worse, the State acknowledged the TEMPLE by asking it to move a bit for road enlargement...
NEW Owners should be aware of such homes and places of worship when they bought the land. Did the new owner(in this case JAKEL) buy the land with the object to get rid of the TEMPLE - so un-Malaysian like attitude?
AND NOW, It is shocking to see that JAKEL gave KL Hindu temple 7 days to vacate, offers RM1m in 'goodwill'...
It is Malaysian to WAIT until new Temple completed, and its functions are already operational - so that USERS of the Temple for worship are uninterrupted - if NOT, where will the worship/etc .... Stop WORSHIP??? WAIT for the NEW Temple to be BUILT and is operational before asking for the OLD Temple to be demolished or RELOCATED.
To understand the WRONG in Jakel's action - imagine if you were a Muslim and it was a Mosque/Surau about to be demolished, or a Christian and it is your Church/Chapel about to be demolished, or a Buddhist/Chinese Religion and it our 100 year old Temple to be demolished...YES put yourself in the shoes of the Hindus who have used this TEMPLE for decades ....
Malaysia is a MULTI-RELIGIOUS nation - and you we should all be concerned even if it is an issue of a Minority Religion ....in this case a HINDU temple..
Is there an issue of law here - YES there is... and if the Jakel and the Temple could have landed in court, and the issue could have taken years to resolve. As mention above, the Temple has a right to claim ownership of the land on which the Temple is, and there is also LEGITIMATE expectation. Was there an approval for the Temple to exist where it is - given by the Colonial British Government, or even the Malaysian government after MERDEKA? There are issues...
If not for the SETTLEMENT agreement, which I believe also the PM and the Federal Government was involved, the Temple decided to MOVE to a new location 50 meters away - and reasonably the MOVE will happen when the new Temple is completely built and the appropriate movement of the Temple happens (being a religious place of worship, there may be prayers or religious activities when this happens).
Places of worship are sometimes considered where GOD resides - so, if JAKEL is asking the Temple to move out now before the new Temple is completed > it is GROSSLY unjust - will 'GOD' be homeless.
One must recall, how the Mid-Valley temple issue was resolved - There Mid-Valley allowed the Temple(with improvements) to remain..
This 100-year old Temple was suddenly asked by Jakel (with/without PM Anwar's knowledge) to expedite the building of the MADANI mosque.
The 'new' temple is yet to be completed, and clearly they should be waiting for the construction of the new Temple to be completed to allow for a move to the Temple so that there will be no disturbance in the Temple activities. If move now, before the new Temple is completed - what will happen to the USERS of the Temple - NO Temple for the community, and a disrupting of all other normal activities in the Temple possibly also religious classes/education, and other activities.
All Malaysians know that at any places of religious worship, be it mosque/suraus, churches, Buddhist Temples or Hindu Temples - the premises are used by the community for so many different functions besides prayers on 1 day - there is a lot of other related activities being carried out.
Back to Jakel, surely the naming of that mosque MADANI mosque and the invitation of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for the ground-breaking session maybe strategic to curry favour with the current MADANI government. If it was built during the Najib era - would it be called 1Malaysia Mosque.
Temple secretary Kaarthik
Gunaseelan, on behalf of the temple management committee, reminded that a
March 2025 directive by then-minister in the Prime Minister’s
Department (Federal Territories), Dr Zaliha Mustafa, offered the
government's commitment to ensure that the temple would not be moved
until the relocation process to its new premises is fully completed.
Some are doubtful whether this MADANI Mosque issue was to show Anwar Ibrahim was a Defender of Islam, even willing to go against Malaysians of other religion. Was it to show a "KETUANAN' Islam - and to remind Malaysians of other religions that if there is a CONFLICT between Islam and any other religion, Anwar and the Government will side with ISLAM. Thankfully in this case, the Temple and its HINDU users were willing to compromise because the alternative site was 50 meters away - but then, who PAID for the purchase and the relocation(including re-building) of this NEW Temple - was it Jakel or was it the Government. Justly, it should have been JAKEL.
IN Malaysia, there are many places of worships, sometimes without LEGAL title or LEGAL permit. Likewise, there are also houses, factories, Musang King plantations too....THAT been allowed to be built and even exist for many many years - giving the people the REPRESENTATION that the government and/or the owners are OK with it and have acknowledged their ownership - LEGITIMATE expectation of ownership recognized by State, owners and/or...
IF it was not OK, would not the government have acted speedily on being aware of any illegal building/structure or even plantation...would not the authorities immediate stop the construction or the clearing of durian plantations - and act on these 'trespassers' or law breakers > but when the government fails to do so - it strengthen the LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION of ownership...
In the case of the Temple, the Local Government also had formal/official interaction with the temple - asking it to relocate a bit, when road expansion
...former Malaysia Hindu Sangam president A
Vaithilingam said the temple merely shifted about two to three feet
(about a metre) to accommodate a road widening project. MIC deputy president M Saravanan said the
shift involved only the quarters for the temple workers, and was done
at the request of Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) in 2006.
This acknowledgement of the Temple when the GOVERNMENT asked the temple to shift 2 meters - If the government considered it an ILLEGAL structure - the government will not make such a request?
Now, the issue was in March 2025 - so why did it take SO LONG for the new land where the Temple was to be relocated to be gazetted for Temple Use. Why the delay in approving the Building Plans...
Instead,
he highlighted that despite constant engagement with local authorities
and stakeholders since April 2025, they had only received approval for a
new building plan in November 2025, and the new land was gazetted for
the temple’s use on Dec 10 last year.
Next, will be the issue of MONEY needed to build the new Temple - Is JAKEL paying for it? Is PM Anwar's MADANI government paying for it - which I believe the GOVERNMENT should be paying for the building of places of worship of all Malaysians - so how much is the Government contributing? Now, it is a TEMPLE, so the question will be MONEY - and usually this is raised by seeking public donations and it will take time? Plans may have been approved - next will come making an estimate of the monies needed. Being a Temple, it will also need skilled workers, and will take some time - much more than ordinary houses and buildings?
I find it most disappointing that a Malaysian company is behaving in such a way -
About Jakel Group
Jakel Group is a diversified Malaysian conglomerate, originating from one of the nation’s most established textile enterprises.
While
firmly rooted in its legacy as a textile leader, the Group has
strategically expanded into a wide range of sectors, including Energy,
Data Centres, Property Development, Information and Communications
Technology (ICT), Renewable Energy (RE), Agriculture, and Capital
Investment. This diversification underscores Jakel’s commitment to
innovation, resilience, and long-term growth.
By
leveraging its heritage and industry expertise, Jakel Group has built a
robust portfolio that spans infrastructure, technology, sustainability,
and financial investment, positioning itself as a forward-looking,
multi-industry leader in both traditional and emerging markets.
How do ordinary people react to a Conglomerate doings things that are unacceptable and wrong - be it violation of worker rights or in this case actions, which I believe are un-Malaysian' with regard to freedom of religion of a MINORITY group in Malaysia.
In other countries, ORDINARY people, who are also consumers, may TAKE ACTION - expressing their views, protesting and even BOYCOTTING products and services of the wrongdoer companies.
Now, any company has their SUPPLY CHAIN - which includes companies that supplies products/services to the said COMPANY, and who market products/services provided the said company. TODAY, blame is also on all these companies in the SUPPLY CHAIN - who still continue to have dealings with the alleged perpetrator company.
While adidas was busy stalling on
actingon antisemitism, the workers who make adidas products were in the
streets demanding an end to pervasive wage theft and union-busting.
In
more than a dozen countries, including Pakistan, Cambodia, Italy, and
the United States, unions and workers' rights groups protested at adidas
supplier factories and stores in a united chorus to tell the brand:
it’s time to #PayYourWorkers and #RespectLabourRights.
In Myanmar, striking workers called on adidas supplier Pou Chen, which
dismissed 26 union members this week, to stop retaliating against their
union and agree to a wage increase. Demonstrations in Germany brought
together activists in dance flash mobs in Leipzig, Muenster, and
Cologne. In Italy a public poster campaign raised awareness about
adidas' responsibility to the workers who make its products.
“With
adidas’ reluctance to end its lucrative deal with Kanye West despite
his antisemitic comments, the world saw something garment workers have
known for decades: adidas will only do the right thing when forced to by
public outrage,” said Nasir Mansoor, General Secretary of the National
Trade Union Federation in Pakistan.
Garment worker unions have
been demonstrating for months to bring attention to the brand’s long and
storied history of wage theft and anti-union repression in its apparel
and footwear supply chains. The Pay Your Workers campaign, endorsed by
260 civil society organisations around the world, including dozens of
unions representing garment workers, is calling on adidas to respect
workers’ rights in its supply chain.
Whilst, it usually is about worker rights, now it is broader - as calls for BOYCOTT of companies supporting the Israel Zionist Regime in protest of the Human Rights Violation of the Palestinian people.
Ansell,
which had been supporting the remediation program, suspended MediCeram
as a supplier and publicly expressed its unhappiness with the company.
On November 5, Ansell told the ABC it had suspended purchases from MediCeram, saying it was "surprised" by the sackings.
"We
promptly expressed our clear view to MediCeram that this was not an
appropriate course of action in the circumstances," a spokesperson said.
"In
the absence of any willingness by MediCeram to reconsider, Ansell has
made the decision to suspend its supplier relationship with the
company."
So, people in Malaysia and those in the SUPPLY CHAIN of JAKEL need to consider this issue and how we RESPOND?
The MADANI government also should respond - and how it response will be a consideration that VOTERS will take.
PERSONALLY, I would ask JAKEL to withdraw their recent EVICTION NOTICE - and wait until the new Temple in the NEW site is completed, and the Temple relocation is done...
WAIT until the Temple Users have a new place to move and continue their religious obligations and other related activities. That will be the PROPER Malaysian response as we all certainly respect our fellow Malaysians, including their freedom of religion.
We are MALAYSIANS, and so it is SAD to see the SILENCE of many Malaysian Political Parties? Are we still in the 'Divide and Rule' based on religion/ethnicity that was introduced the British Colonial government to weaken Malaysian peoples' unity in their struggle for Independence and Human Rights?
Are these political parties still following the 'practice' that only Indian political parties should be responding to issues affecting Indians/Hindus? SO SAD, if this is the case.
What is Akmal and UMNO's stance? Do they only CARE about Malay and Muslim Malaysian issues...? Amanah, PAS, BERSATU, MUDA,...?? Political parties may still be DIVIDED based on religion/ethnicity - but Malaysian people have moved on and we CARE about all issues of RIGHTS and JUSTICE irrespective of who is the perpetrator and victim, or what their ethnicity/religion are?
Sadly, PM Anwar and the MADANI government is also slow to ACT....WHY?
The TIMING of Jakel Notice is also an act of insensitivity - it was during the Hindu festival of Ponggal?
JAKEL should also APOLOGIZE ,,, and the Public Prosecutor should also consider whether JAKEL has violated any laws...????
Jakel gives KL Hindu temple 7 days to vacate, offers RM1m in 'goodwill'
Hariz Mohd & Yiswaree Palansamy
Published: Jan 15, 2026 4:35 PM
⋅
Updated: Jan 16, 2026 3:24 P
Jakel
Trading has given the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman temple management seven
days to relocate the existing structure from a land parcel owned by the
textile company along Jalan Munshi Abdullah in Kuala Lumpur.
According to a notice dated Jan 13, sighted by Malaysiakini, the company is seeking the temple’s immediate cooperation to vacate the site, for development works to begin within a month.
In
the letter signed by Jakel Trading’s general manager, Khadijah Yatib,
the company said it has set aside RM1 million, which may be disbursed by
Jakel’s lawyers “at any time upon confirmation that the temple has
fully vacated the site”.
The notice also warned that failure to
comply would leave the company with no alternative but to withdraw its
“goodwill offer” and take all necessary legal action to enforce its
rights as the landowner.
Malaysiakini contacted Jakel Trading director Nizam Jakel, who confirmed the notice.
“I sent the letter (to the temple) just yesterday. We hope they can vacate the land immediately,” he said in a text message.
Jakel Trading director Nizam Jakel
Nizam also confirmed that the RM1 million contribution was based on a previous agreement reached between Jakel and the temple.
Temple questions feasibility of move
However, temple committee secretary G Kaarthik told Malaysiakini that he is seeking advice from lawyers.
“Yes,
we got the letter from Jakel yesterday. They want us to vacate within
seven days. We want to negotiate, as we have not gotten a vacant
possession (status) for the new land.
“Also, is it possible to
move a whole temple within seven days? It’s impossible. We have already
shared all these with the government, so we are surprised as to why they
are not commenting.
“And where is the government’s commitment
made in their letter to us on March 25 last year, in which they agreed
that the temple need not move until the relocation process is completed
fully? The government must keep their promise,” Kaarthik said when
contacted.
Current location of the temple in Kuala Lumpur
He said that while the new site for the temple has been gazetted, further processes must be completed before the move.
“We have already gotten it, but there are processes to observe. We feel sad about this situation,” Kaarthik added.
Dispute draws national attention
The
dispute over the temple land gained national attention last year
following a March 20 press conference by Lawyers for Liberty, together
with former Malaysian Bar president Ambiga Sreenevasan and members of
the temple management committee.
The
press conference was held in response to Jakel Trading’s plans to
develop a mosque on the land, a project that would require the
relocation of the temple, which remains at its original location along
Jalan Bunus Enam, opposite Jakel Mall.
Advocates for the temple’s
preservation cited its long history, saying the shrine dates back to the
British colonial era and has been a place of worship for generations.
Critics,
however, argued that the temple has no legal claim to the land, which
was sold by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to Jakel, and should therefore
relocate to make way for development.
Following the public
outcry, discussions were held involving Jakel, the temple committee, and
DBKL, after which City Hall agreed to relocate the temple
to a site about 50 metres from its current location, within the same
Jalan Masjid India area. This was also agreed to by the temple’s
chairperson.
While a relocation plan was announced, the temple has
not been physically moved and continues to operate at its original site
pending the finalisation of relocation arrangements.
MIC deputy
president M Saravanan later said a 4,000 sq ft plot of land would be
gazetted permanently for the temple as part of the relocation exercise. - Malaysiakini, 15/1/2026
On eve of Ponggal, KL Hindu temple told to vacate in 7 days or face eviction
The
government previously assured the Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple that
it would not be required to vacate until the new site was ready.
MalaysiaNow
The more than a century old Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman temple, now nestled between skyscrapers near the Masjid India vicinity.
As Hindus celebrate Ponggal this week, a pre-Merdeka era temple in Kuala Lumpur which was at the centre of a massive dispute last year has been given notice to vacate or prepare to be evicted, MalaysiaNow has learnt.
Landowner Jakel, the textile company which had controversially
announced the construction of a mosque to be named after Prime Minister
Anwar Ibrahim's political slogan "Madani" on the site, has given the
Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman Temple, located just across Jakel Mall in the
busy Jalan Masjid India area, seven days to move to vacate the land. The
letter was issued on Jan 13, 2026, on the eve of the four-day Ponggal
festival.
The company said this was to allow it to "proceed with early
commencement of site activities" following approval from Dewan Bandaraya
Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) to begin construction.
The temple land dispute erupted in March last year after it was
reported that Anwar would officiate at a groundbreaking ceremony for the
construction of "Masjid Madani" on the same site.
At the centre of the dispute is the fact that the land on which the
temple is located was sold by the government to Jakel, despite the
temple's existence being facilitated by DBKL over the decades, including
instructing it to be rebuilt in 2008 to allow the construction of an
access road.
After the sale of the land to Jakel in 2014, DBKL gave the temple an
ultimatum to move to an alternative site in Sungai Buloh, which would
take it away from the large community of worshippers the temple served.
The temple has firmly rejected accusations that it is occupying the
land illegally, citing its hundred year history and assurances given by
successive governments and ministers.
In the midst of the storm, Anwar went ahead and officiated the
groundbreaking event for the construction of the mosque named after his
government's slogan.
The dispute was resolved on the eve of the groundbreaking ceremony,
following negotiations involving Jakel and then minister in charge of
federal territories, Dr Zaleha Mustafa, and it was agreed that the
temple would be given a new plot of land about 50m away.
In addition, Zaleha in her capacity as the FT minister gave the
government’s commitment to the temple committee by a letter dated March
25, 2025, that the temple was not required to move "until arrangements
for relocation to the new site are completed".
In its letter this week, Jakel warned that it would seek to evict the temple if it did not vacate by Jan 20.
"Please be advised that failure to comply with this request will
leave us with no alternative but to withdraw our goodwill offer and to
take all necessary legal options to enforce our rights as the lawful
landowner, including but not limited to initiating legal proceedings for
eviction," it said.
MalaysiaNow is attempting to contact the relevant parties for their response. - MalaysiaNow, 15/1/2026
Temple accuses Jakel of defying govt's orders
Published: Jan 16, 2026 3:12 PM
⋅
Updated: 5:05 PM
The
Dewi Sri Pathrakaliamman temple committee has accused Jakel Trading of
"defying and disregarding government undertakings”, following the
textile company's latest demands for the temple to immediately relocate
its premises within seven days.
Temple secretary Kaarthik
Gunaseelan, on behalf of the temple management committee, reminded that a
March 2025 directive by then-minister in the Prime Minister’s
Department (Federal Territories), Dr Zaliha Mustafa, offered the
government's commitment to ensure that the temple would not be moved
until the relocation process to its new premises is fully completed.
“We note that until now, Jakel Trading had not objected to the March 2025 agreement and undertaking of the government.
“Therefore,
we deeply regret your sudden and unreasonable demand that we vacate the
land, in disregard and defiance of the government's undertaking,” he
said in a letter today, addressed to company directors, Faroz Jakel and
Nizam Jakel.
Yesterday, Kaarthik told Malaysiakini
that he would seek legal advice after receiving the notice to
immediately vacate their temple from the land parcel owned by the
textile company along Jalan Munshi Abdullah in Kuala Lumpur.
The Jan 13 notice sighted by Malaysiakini urged immediate cooperation and noted that development works would begin within a month’s time.
The
textile company also said it has set aside RM1 million as a “goodwill
offer”, which may be disbursed by Jakel’s lawyers “at any time upon
confirmation that the temple has fully vacated the site”.
However,
they warned that the temple’s failure to comply would leave Jakel with
no alternative but to withdraw its offer and to pursue legal action in
enforcing its rights as the landowner.
Nizam Jakel
Nizam confirmed the matter when contacted by Malaysiakini yesterday.
Concern over threat
Meanwhile,
Kaarthik said that they were reluctant to accept the company’s RM1
million “goodwill offer”, especially since they disagreed with many of
the conditions imposed.
“We appreciate your proposed contribution
of RM1 million towards our building costs. However, we cannot and will
not accept it with any conditions attached to it as stated in your
letter,” he stressed in his address to Jakel's directors.
Further, Kaarthik also emphasised that there have been no delays whatsoever in the temple’s efforts to relocate its premises.
Instead,
he highlighted that despite constant engagement with local authorities
and stakeholders since April 2025, they had only received approval for a
new building plan in November 2025, and the new land was gazetted for
the temple’s use on Dec 10 last year.
“And only yesterday, Jan 15,
were we told by email that vacant possession of the plot was ready. In
short, we have proceeded with all possible speed since last year,” he
said.
Kaarthik also expressed concern over Jakel’s threats of
“further escalation” if the temple committee failed to comply with their
demands.
He described such language as “inappropriate and unacceptable”, as well as “defiant and disregarding government undertakings”.
The temple’s current location
He
also rebuked the textile company’s claims that they had already
received a development order and building plan for their new project on
the site, noting that such approvals were also in breach of government
directives.
“If such approval has been given by Kuala Lumpur City
Hall (DBKL), without our knowledge, the government is obliged to cancel
or revoke it, as the government is bound by the March 25, 2025,
undertaking.
“DBKL as a government body cannot act in defiance of a public undertaking made by the government itself,” he stressed.
Yesterday,
Kaarthik also questioned the government’s commitment and reminded the
government to fulfil its promise to the temple’s management committee.
Land dispute
The
dispute over the temple land gained national attention last year when
Lawyers for Liberty, together with former Malaysian Bar president Ambiga
Sreenevasan had publicly criticised Jakel Trading’s plans to develop a mosque on the land.
The project would require the relocation of the temple, which remains at its original location along Jalan Bunus Enam, opposite Jakel Mall.
Advocates
for the temple’s preservation cited its long history, saying the shrine
dates back to the British colonial era and has been a place of worship
for generations.
Critics, however, argued that the temple has no legal claim to the land, which was sold by DBKL to Jakel, and should therefore relocate to make way for development.
Following
the public outcry, discussions were held involving Jakel, the temple
committee, and DBKL, after which City Hall agreed to relocate the temple
to a site about 50m from its current location, within the same Jalan
Masjid India area. This was also agreed to by the temple’s chairperson.
While
a relocation plan was announced, the temple has not been physically
moved and continues to operate at its original site pending the
finalisation of relocation arrangements. - Malaysiakini, 16/1/2026
A multi-billion ringgit scandal that dwarfs 1MDB?
-
Check out this story in The Edge about the MBI pyramid scheme which emerged
about a decade ago: The Ponzi scheme that rocked Penang (I remember back
then t...
APA PADA NAMA
-
1. Sejarah Malaysia dikait rapat dengan UMNO, Parti Kebangsaan Melayu
Bersatu. Parti UMNO pula dikenali dengan pemimpinnya. 2. Demikian di
peringkat permul...
China and HK may be barred from Asia Team meet
-
PETALING JAYA: The status of next week’s Asia Team Champion-ships in
Manila, the Philippines, is in quandary as two badminton nations – China
and Hong Kong...
PRU14 - Keputusan TEMERLOH - Parlimen dan DUN
-
Keputusan di Temerloh, harus kita analisa
1- Parlimen dimenangi Pakatan Harapan, yang juga menang DUN Mentakab,
tetapi BN menang DUN Lancang dan DUN Kuala ...
Thank you, Malaysians
-
Before the lights go out on The Malaysian Insider at midnight, we say
"Thank You" to our readers. TMI started on February 25, 2008. Today, after
eight year...
I believe in the freedom of expression - and everyone is free to use, reproduce, quote, copy and circulate, etc... materials published here. Please credit the source: http://charleshector.blogspot.com/.
For those of you who do have Blogs/Websites, it would be good if you could add a link to CHARLES HECTOR Blog. Please do promote the BLOG.
Anonymous comments or those containing profanities and obscenities (or irrelevant matters) will be rejected. Note that all comments made in post are personal opinions.
Number of Visits
Over 4 million visits. On an average, we have about 700-750 visits per day.Thank you all for your support and encouragement..