The Pakatan Rakyat should be formalized now - with a logo, a constitution, etc.... just like the Barisan Nasional.
The present "working relationship" between PAS, DAP and PKR (and some other political parties in Sarawak, etc..) is just too flimsy and uncertain - in fact, good if Anwar is running under Pakatan Rakyat name, flag, banner, logo... in the up-coming by-elections.
How does Pakatan Rakyat come to a decision or a position - is it by majority OR does it like the ASEAN require consensus (the later being not the preferred system).
Would the founding 3 have veto powers like the UN Security Council - would each of the parties in the coalition have ONE vote each, or will the vote be based on the number of members that they have (or something else).
Formalization now is good - on the verge of the formation of the Federal government...
Because tommorrow when in power, there may arise other complications ....remember that saying 'power corrupts absolute power corrupts absolutely' - Now the Pakatan Rakyat has power - and by 16 September, they may have absolute power.
To get absolute power - there may be parties leaving the BN and joining the Pakatan - MIC and MCA may come over and join the Pakatan. Maybe GERAKAN may join the Pakatan. Maybe PSM, when registered may join Pakatan....
mmmm
MACC’s demand that Albert Tei’s lawyer come in for questioning is unlawful
and an act of blatant intimidation
-
Lawyers for Liberty says MACC's questioning of Albert Tei's lawyer
threatens solicitor-client privilege and the rule of law.
The post MACC’s demand that ...
34 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment