Friday, December 12, 2025

Health Club Raid - SUHAKAM raises concerns about PRIVACY, legality of the Raid/Arrest/Detention/Disciplinary Actions, Pre-Conviction 'defamation' of patrons and business?

Recently, there was a police raid on what the police allegedly said was 'a health club believed to have been used for unnatural sexual activities'. Pictures of men in towels were circulated ... 

Was not the premises a LEGAL business operation - which had the needed permits by the Local Government/Council, and all other needed permits/licenses by relevant authorities - unfortunately no mention of the establishment, or these relevant facts. If they were carrying out any 'illegal activities' - then naturally the premises and the business would be de-registered > to date no mention of this.

If the police/authorities raid a LEGAL massage parlour - and ask customers getting a massage to step out, not giving them time to bathe or change into their clothes - they too will end up just with towels.

No body used a SAUNA fully clothed..Nobody uses a Jacuzzi fully clothed...Nobody uses a hot bath, or even a swimming pool fully clothed - and if the authorities did not allow them to change into their normal clothes - and made them come out in their towels... it will end up with a group of towel clad men..and sometimes even women. DOES this mean that they are involved in 'illegal' or unnatural sexual activities.

At the end of the day - there was NO EVIDENCE of any illegal or unnatural sexual activities. Even if there was, it would definitely not involve ALL the patrons in a LEGAL Business establishment..

After the raid, all the patrons were arrested indiscriminately and the police then went to apply for REMAND so they could detain them for more than 24 hours - and guess what, we had a GOOD Majistrate, who did not blindly give the remand order simply based on the police/authorities allegations...

WHY did this happen? Our PM Anwar Ibrahim was previously tried and convicted for SODOMY - and the convictions was affirmed by both appellate courts - including the Federal Court, and he was sentenced to imprisonment -Months before he completed serving his sentence, after PH won the GE, he was released from incarceration by reason of a ROYAL PARDON. However, Anwar has always insisted on his INNOCENCE - and, after he became Prime Minister, there has been crackdowns - was it to prove that Anwar Ibrahim was straight - and not a gay, bisexual or one with other sexual preferences?

* A concert was stopped because 2 of the male performers kissed one another on stage - but NO charges was levied against them - WHY? Was it because they were popular foreign artists? 

* There was a crackdown where 172 rainbow-coloured SWATCH watches were illegally seized, because that 'rainbow colour' was identified with other kinds of sexual preferences > 

* Then, there was a crackdown on GISBH -  were allegations of human trafficking, exploiting children....- children were asked to sodomise other, etc ... BUT since the crackdown that happened more than a year ago, there has still been NO court convictions proving the truth of these allegations. Even, if there 1 or 2 cases of Sodomy, the only crime of any leader, officer or GISBH is not reporting the crime >> and even then, whether SODOMY occurred and whether the perpetrator ought to be charged is up to the police after investiagtion and the Public Prosecutor.. to date, I believe there is still NO charges..

* The health club crackdown follows a 'similar mindset' - a crackdown on unnatural sexual activities?

One wonders is it all about the IMAGE of the PM Anwar Ibrahim - a demonstration that he is against all forms of 'unnatural' sexual activities, and other sexual preferences other than the traditional man-woman sexual activity? Then, the IMPORTANT question, as to whether Malaysia should CRIMINALIZE sexual activities different from man-woman sexual activities? 

DANGER...danger - a perusal of the current SODOMY offences makes criminals of even husbands if they do certain crimes.. The definition of 'carnal intercourse against the order of nature' NEED to be amended - if not how many husbands within a lawful marriage may also be guilty of the CRIME?

377A  Carnal intercourse against the order of nature

Any person who has sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature.

Explanation Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual connection necessary to the offence described in this section.

LGBTQ - What consensus of the Malaysian people? Did Anwar misrepresent to the world? Repeal Section 377B Penal Code - decriminalize consensual sexual acts between man and wife, and consenting adults?

Back to the RAID on the Health CLUB - there are other issues - like PRIVACY, and also the 'defamation' of the patrons?

If the premises are LEGAL - then it is wrong also to target Public Officers caught in the RAID - Is there a LAW preventing Public Officers going for masssage, sauna, hot baths, jacuzzi or even health centres? NO - there is NOT at the moment.

Is there any ISLAMIC law prohibiting Muslims from going for a massage, sauna, jacuzzi, public baths, etc...? 

WHO made the police report - should he/she also be investigated? Was there some other ULTERIOR motive on the part of the maker of the report?

If someone makes a police report of immoral and illegal sexual activities happening at the PM's residence/premises or some Minister's or some political party premises, would the police have acted in a similar manner? 

Consider, some of the possible reasons for such a RAID on massage centres and health clubs?

# CORRUPTION - would some premises to prevent such raids, that can seriously impact their businesses now be willing to "BRIBE" the police or others to prevent such publicized raids? 

# ELIMINATION OF BUSINESS COMPETITION - did some competing business try to get rid of a competitor? After all customers tend to avoid premises that have been raided by the authorities, and patrons end up being arrested or taken in for questioning? WORSE if it is reported in media, as people tend to blindly believe on reported allegations...and so the victims, although later proven innocent or the report/allegations baseless do suffer the prejudice caused...

This is NOT the first time - for we often read of arrest of WOMEN, usually foreigners, on premises allegedly providing illegal sexual services - here too, we then do not see any trial or convictions for the said charges... so, everyone would have got the impression that they are prostitutes or sex-workers breaking Malaysian laws > when they may be just INNOCENT persons. Many of the foreigners may later find themselves being sent back after their social visit passes expire... and once, they are out of Malaysia, they cannot even easily take action against the law enforcement officers...

As SUHAKAM pointed out - law enforcement cannot simply raid/arrest/detain based on just some police report -  

SUHAKAM notes reports that the raid was conducted and arrests hastily effected without the presence or identification of victims. Enforcement actions, especially involving personal conduct and arrest, must be based on verified information and credible evidence. In the instant case, the absence of identifiable victims and evidence, as clarified by the Kuala Lumpur Police Chief Officer (CPO), raises concerns about the basis of the mass arrests and any ensuing disciplinary measures.

Here, they did not even have ANY EVIDENCE of the Crime, or even any 'VICTIM' of the alleged crimes.   

 

 

Media Statement No. 56-2025_SUHAKAM Calls for Transparent and Fair Process Following Raid at Wellness Centre

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

“Justice for the Disappeared: What the Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat Decision Means for Human Rights in Malaysia”- Mohd Hishamudin Md Yunus(SUHAKAM Chair) - a good read..

# Much appreciation to SUHAKAM Chairman Mohd Hishamudin Yunus who was willing to share his speaking notes, for the speech he gave at a recent program “Justice for the Disappeared: What the Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat Decision Means for Human Rights in Malaysia”. Many of us would have not had the pleasure of hearing and reflecting on his speech, and thus here we share the said 'Speaking Notes' unedited - and being speaking notes, it may slightly differ from the actual speech on 6/12/2025... 


. Speaking Notes Dato’ Seri Mohd Hishamudin Md Yunus, Chairman, Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
 

“Justice for the Disappeared: What the Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat Decision Means for Human Rights in Malaysia”


6 December 2025 (Saturday)
Venue: TBC


Salutations

Distinguished guests, members of the legal fraternity, distinguished representatives from various agencies and organisations, friends from the media, and members of the public.

Assalamualaikum and good morning.

I would like to begin my speech by expressing my sincere appreciation to HAKAM for organising this important forum and for inviting me to deliver the opening remarks. It is an honour for SUHAKAM to be part of this gathering, especially when we meet in conjunction with International Human Rights Day, a time when the global community reflects on our shared humanity and our collective responsibility to protect the dignity of every person. I also would like to thank HAKAM for creating a public space to discuss what is, quite frankly, a pivotal moment for human rights in Malaysia.


INTRODUCTION

1. Ladies and gentlemen, over the past few weeks, Malaysia has witnessed a landmark judgment that has drawn national attention. The recent High Court’s decision on the enforced disappearances of Pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat marks a significant moment for our nation. It is a moment that compels us to pause, to reflect, and to consider what this ruling means not only for the affected families, but also for the state of human rights and the rule of law in Malaysia.


2. I would like to take this opportunity to offer my sincere congratulations to the legal teams and all who worked tirelessly to bring these matters before the courts. Their dedication, perseverance and professionalism have enabled a judicial finding that will help shape our national understanding of enforceddisappearance and the obligations of the State. Their work exemplifies the highest ideals of the legal profession, which is to speak truth to power, to pursue justice with integrity, and to stand by victims even when the path is long and difficult.

3. In 2019, SUHAKAM’s Public Inquiry concluded that both Pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat were victims of enforced disappearance. SUHAKAM undertook such Public Inquiry because it is our statutory duty to investigate allegations of human rights violations. Today, the Court’s decision affirms the importance of that Inquiry, and reinforces why independent human rights
institutions exist, which is to seek truth, to insist upon accountability and to make certain that families are not deprived of the truth. SUHAKAM is glad to have played its part and remains committed to ensuring that the principles expressed in the judgment translate into meaningful advancement.


ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCES AND HUMAN RIGHTS

4. Beyond the legal and procedural aspects, this judgment invites us to reflect deeply on the human rights dimensions of enforced disappearance. Enforced disappearance is one of the gravest violations of human rights as it deprives a person of liberty. It removes them from the protection of the law and it strips away liberty. It causes immeasurable suffering to their families, who continue to live with uncertainty, anguish and the hope that their loved ones
may return.

5. The recent High Court’s judgment is monumental because it affirms a principle at the very heart of human rights: the right to life and personal liberty, and the right to equal protection before the law, as enshrined under Article 5 and Article 8 of our Federal Constitution. These rights are not abstract. They are the foundation of our social and legal order. It reinforces the idea that no one, whether an ordinary citizen or an officer of the State, may act outside the
boundaries of the law. It serves as a profound reminder that no institution, however powerful, is above the Constitution. The Court ruling therefore holds profound meaning for the human rights landscape in Malaysia.


Role of Judiciary

6. One clear message from the judgment is the centrality of the judiciary in protecting human rights. Courts are a crucial check on abuses of power. When the judiciary acts independently and with courage, as it did in this case, it becomes an essential guardian of the rule of law and a catalyst for institutional reform. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the essence of a functioning
constitutional democracy.

7. This decision demonstrates the judiciary’s role in ensuring justice where other mechanisms have failed. Judicial independence is not a mere concept, it is a living mechanism that safeguards the rights of the vulnerable, especially when they stand alone against powerful forces.

8. It reflects a judiciary that is willing to ask difficult questions and demand accountability, even if it invites controversy or scrutiny. In doing so, the judiciary restores public confidence and signals that Malaysia’s legal system retains the moral courage to confront wrongdoing, even when perpetrated by agents of the State. This courage is indispensable, not only for the families of the disappeared, but for all Malaysians who rely on the courts to protect their liberties.

Accountability of Enforcement Agencies

9. Ladies and gentlemen, the judgment also sends a strong message about the accountability of enforcement agencies. The police and other enforcement agencies carry immense responsibility. They hold powers that directly affect the liberty, security and lives of individuals. With such powers comes the duty to act with integrity, transparency and full respect for the law and human rights. They must be guardians, not violators of human rights. As such, the recent Court’s decision has, in its own way, helped restore public trust and reaffirmed that those entrusted with power must exercise it responsibly and in accordance with human rights principles.

10. Another striking aspect of the High Court’s decision is its recognition that State responsibility can arise even when every detail has not been fully reconstructed. In cases of enforced disappearance, the withholding of information is itself part of the violation. Liability does not simply disappear because certain facts remain hidden. The concealment of information, itself, is a component of the harm. The Court found that the disappearances of Pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat involved the conduct of State agents, directly or indirectly, and that the State bears responsibility for the violation of their constitutional rights, even where crucial evidence was concealed or withheld. This judgment reminds us that the truth cannot be buried indefinitely, for justice has a way of resurfacing, even after many years.

11. The Court also took notice of the findings of the Special Task Force regarding the State’s responsibility, which were consistent with SUHAKAM’s own findings. This reinforces the seriousness of the State’s conduct behind these tragedies and strengthens the call for meaningful institutional reform. This ultimately reflects a vital human rights principle, that accountability is not optional, it is a continuing obligation.

International Human Rights Obligations

12. Ladies and gentlemen, we must reflect on our wider human rights obligations. While Malaysia has yet to accede to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”), the principles embodied in it remain highly relevant to our national commitments. Article 9 of ICCPR guarantees the right to liberty and security of person, while Article 18 protects the freedom of thought, conscience and religion. These rights already echoed in our Federal Constitution and in the international standards we have pledged to uphold.

13. The High Court’s findings resonate strongly with these obligations. Enforced disappearance represents one of the most severe forms of interference with fundamental liberties, not only by removing individuals from the protection of the law, but also by creating an environment of fear that suppresses belief and expression.

14. As a nation that has repeatedly affirmed its commitment to strengthening human rights protections, Malaysia must ensure that these rights are respected in practice, not merely acknowledged in aspiration. We must ensure that every measure is taken to protect these fundamental rights and to prevent similar violations in the future. This requires sustained commitment in strengthening investigative procedures, ensuring judicial oversight of detentions, prohibiting secret or unauthorised operations and cultivating a culture within enforcement institutions that prioritises human dignity.

International Convention for The Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

15. Similarly, the decision of the High Court is aligned with the principles embodied in the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (“ICPPED”). Article 1 of the Convention recognizes that enforced disappearance is a continuing crime, which is a violation that persists until the fate or whereabouts of the person is established. Article 3 further emphasises the State’s duty to investigate every allegation of disappearance promptly, thoroughly and impartially, and to ensure that those responsible are
brought to justice.

16. These principles underscore that enforced disappearance is not merely an individual tragedy, but it is a profound violation of multiple fundamental rights. International human rights standards make clear that when a person goes missing in circumstances implicating State responsibility, the State must respond promptly, transparently, and thoroughly. This is a binding obligation, not a matter of discretion. As Malaysia has not yet acceded to this Convention, cases such as those of Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat illustrate why we should consider taking this step to become a State Party to the treaty.

National Human Rights Institutions and Public Inquiry

17. I am also encouraged that the Court expressly acknowledged the role of SUHAKAM’s Public Inquiry. The judgment recognised that many of SUHAKAM’s findings were persuasive and consistent with the evidence before the Court. This validation of SUHAKAM’s work affirms the importance of independent national human rights institutions and reinforces why mechanisms such as Public Inquiry remains essential in safeguarding rights and uncovering truth where ordinary processes encounter barriers.

18. National human rights institutions such as SUHAKAM have a distinctive and essential role in safeguarding fundamental rights. Our mandate is not limited to receiving complaints, it includes the responsibility to inquire, to document, to preserve evidence, and to make recommendations grounded in human rights principles.

19. These mechanisms do not replace the work of law-enforcement or the courts, but they reinforce it, by ensuring transparency, supporting accountability, and giving victims and families a platform when other doors are closed. This is why the Public Inquiry held by SUHAKAM was so crucial, and why its findings continue to provide an important foundation for uncovering the truth and advancing meaningful reforms in this case.

Impact on Families and The Moral Duty of The State

20. Ladies and gentlemen, let us not lose sight of the human reality behind all of this. Behind every legal document, every case file, and every institutional process, there are human beings—families, children, spouses and communities who live with pain and unanswered questions. The recent Court’s judgment acknowledged something deeply human, that the suffering of families
in cases of enforced disappearance is real, prolonged, and cannot be dismissed as speculative.

21. The Court had made another powerful observation, that no amount of compensation can bring closure in a case of enforced disappearance. Financial remedies, while important, cannot replace the truth. What families seek is not only justice, but knowledge of what had happened to their loved ones. Without truth, the wound remains open, and uncertainty becomes a quiet form of suffering that follows them every day. Only disclosure, and a sincere effort to uncover the truth, can bring dignity back to the lives affected.

22. For eight long years, the spouse and family of Pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat have endured emotional hardship and uncertainty. Their pain is not hypothetical as it is the natural consequence of a disappearance that remains unresolved. Their resilience is a testament to the strength of the human spirit and the unyielding desire for truth. As a society, we must honour their courage by ensuring that our institutions respond with integrity, compassion and a commitment to justice.

RECOMMENDATION

23. Ladies and gentlemen, allow me to outline several recommendations as we look ahead. In light of the High Court’s judgment and SUHAKAM’s long involvement, I wish to offer clear, concrete recommendations as follows:

First- A thorough, independent re-investigation on the disappearances

24. It is our recommendation that the re-investigation on the disappearances of Pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat as ordered by the Court is carried out with utmost independence, professionalism, transparency and adequately resourced. Independence is essential to ensure credibility and to bring perpetrators to account. While credible process is necessary not only for justice to be served, but also to restore public trust in our institutions. In order to find the truth, it requires a sincere and structured approach, free from interference or bias.

25. This thorough re-investigation should also extend to follow-up actions concerning the enforced disappearances of Joshua Hilmy and Ruth Sitepu. We strongly urge that their case be immediately re-investigated. Our SUHAKAM Public Inquiry in 2022 concluded that the couple were abducted by persons unknown and that the police’s half-hearted investigation amounted to State’s acquiescence in what must be considered an enforced disappearance.

26. Notably, as Ruth Sitepu is an Indonesian citizen, it invokes Malaysia’s obligations under international law to provide legal protection to all foreigners within its territory. These obligations arise under customary international law and apply regardless of formal treaty ratification. We believe Malaysia has failed in its international law obligation towards Indonesia by failure to accord protection to Ruth Sitepu. Given the severity of this violation and the failure to prevent it, the State must act immediately and demonstrate that accountability is upheld for every person within its jurisdiction.

27. It is often said that enforced disappearance is a “continuing violation,” because the pain does not end until the truth is known. For this reason, the State bears a fundamental duty to uncover the truth, to hold wrongdoers accountable, and to provide closure to the families. I remain hopeful that with the right commitment, we can ensure that the families will finally receive the closure they deserve.


Second- strengthen the rule of law and oversight mechanisms

28. We recommend meaningful reforms to strengthen both internal police accountability mechanisms and independent oversight. Malaysia needs stronger systems, inside and outside enforcement agencies to ensure that power is exercised responsibly. This includes improving internal disciplinary processes, strengthening command responsibility, enhancing external monitoring, and equipping parliamentary oversight to play a more active role.

29. These measures are not punitive, they are preventive. They are necessary to close systemic gaps that allow misconduct to occur unchecked, and to avoid recurrence. Only with meaningful checks and balances can the public’s confidence in the police and enforcement agencies be rebuilt.

30. At the heart of these reforms lies our constitutional commitment to the rule of law. The Federal Constitution, as the supreme law of the land, demands that public authorities act within the limits of the law and remain accountable to it. No officer, agency, or institution is exempt from this obligation. Upholding the supremacy of law is essential to preventing abuse of power and protecting the rights of the people.


Third- Malaysia to accede to the ICPPED

31. It is our recommendation that Malaysia should seriously consider acceding to the ICPPED. Doing so would demonstrate a national commitment to preventing and punishing enforced disappearance. Accession would provide Malaysia with a clear legal framework for prevention, investigation, victim protection and accountability—areas where the recent cases have shown significant systemic gaps.
 

32. Importantly, accession would harmonise our domestic framework with global standards and reinforce Malaysia’s commitment to human rights as we take our place on the international stage and towards international community. It would send a clear and unequivocal message that the State rejects enforced disappearance in all its forms.


Fourth- Lawmaker to enact specific legislation criminalising enforced disappearance

33. We also recommend that Parliament to enact a specific legislation criminalizing enforced disappearance. The absence of a standalone domestic offence of enforced disappearance leaves critical gaps and weakened the State’s ability to respond effectively. Parliament should enact specific criminal legislation that codify the duties of the State to search for the disappeared, to preserve evidence, to prevent concealment, and to provide rights to families.

34. A comprehensive dedicated statute would ensure clarity in investigation, prosecution and punishment. Such legislation should reflect international best practices and should be developed in consultation with civil society, victims’ groups, and human rights institutions to ensure that it is practical, enforceable and victim-centred.

Lastly- Protection and support for victims and witnesses

35. It is our recommendation that the State shall ensure meaningful protection for families, witnesses and individuals who come forward. We strongly urge the State to build an environment where truth-tellers feel protected, where victims feel heard, and where the justice system actively safeguards those who seek accountability. Protection programs, psychosocial support, and legal assistance must be available so that truth-tellers are safeguarded.


CLOSING

36. Ladies and gentlemen, as we reflect on the impact of this judgment and the path forward, let us remember that the pursuit of truth and justice is not the responsibility of the courts alone. It is a shared responsibility of institutions, of public officials, of civil society, and of every individual who believes in fairness and humanity. 

37. This judgment is not an end but a summons to action. It is now for the Government, Parliament, the courts, enforcement agencies, and civil society to work together to ensure that the lessons from these tragedies are translated into durable reforms.

38. As a nation, we must take this moment seriously. This judgment invites us to reflect on the kind of institutions we want — institutions that protect rights, uphold the law, and serve the people with honour. It reminds us that human rights are not theoretical ideals, but living principles that must guide our actions, policies and decision-making.

39. SUHAKAM will continue to discharge its mandate without fear or favour. We will continue to investigate, to advise, and to advocate for victims. We stand ready to work with all stakeholders to strengthen protections, to support families in their search for truth, and to ensure that Malaysia upholds its human rights obligations and the rule of law.

40. I conclude by thanking HAKAM and all partners for organising this public forum.I thank the legal teams, the advocates, and especially the families who have persevered in the pursuit of truth. May today’s discussion deepens the public understanding, strengthen our institutions, and bring us closer to justice and closure for the disappeared.


Thank you.

Malaysian Bar Reiterates that Legal Professional Privilege Must be Upheld - what about how a lawyer on site should be treated by law enforcement?? Maybe the Bar will come out soon...????

Recently, there was a great concern surrounding the arrest of Albert Tei, whereby even the lawyer present at the scene whilst arrest and search were being conducted highlighted serious concerns - the arresting officers came in Balaclavas (masks covering their face preventing identification), and even refused to identify themselves to the lawyer, refused to even tell the lawyer where arrested Albert Tei was being taken, failed to inform the lawyer too of the reason for the arrest, search or even what was taken from Albert's premises - this is AGAINST the law, for the authorities should have identified themselves, etc - see

Abolish VETO power to enable the United Nations to be able to be an effective defender of human rights (HR Day Statement of 19 Groups)

 


Media Statement – 10/12/2025(World Human Rights Day)

Abolish VETO power to enable the United Nations to be able to be an effective defender of human rights, with the power to end human rights violations

On this World Human Rights Day (10 December) we, the 19 undersigned groups, organizations and trade unions express our greatest disappointment that the United Nations that was expected to defend and promote human rights have failed in its objects, and the expectations of the peoples of the world.

It is still possible to rectify this dilemma, if and only if the member states of the United Nations are committed to abolish the VETO power that is now with the 5 Permanent member States – Russia, China, France, United States of America and the United Kingdom, so that it can no longer impede the UN from defending and promoting human rights, and ensuring justice be done.

VETO violates principle of sovereign equality

The UN Charter, in Article 2(1) states, ‘The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its members.’ This fundamental principle of EQUALITY is violated if the United Nations continue to allow a class of ‘super members’, who can use their VETO power to prevent actions advocated by even the majority of UN member States.

VETO prevents UN from ending human rights violations

The preamble of the UN Charter clearly states the obligation of the UN is ‘to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small,’. Thus, the UN acts for human rights, not just when States commit extra-territorial human rights violations but also human rights violations within the jurisdiction of respective States, regardless they are UN members or not. Thus, the UN protects human rights of ALL human persons, and not just rights of member States.

Through the various UN processes, including the UPR process, the UN and UN member States has called on member States to move away from injustices and human rights violations, and calls on States and others to enact rights protecting laws, and abolish laws, practices and even policies that are in violation of human rights. As such, the UN has worked to promote, amongst others, women rights, indigenous rights, environmental rights and the rights of human rights defenders. It has opposed ethnic cleansing, genocide, forced labour

However, the United Nations have been prevented from doing the needful, by reason of abuse of power of some of the permanent 5 by the use of the VETO – that has effectively prevented UN from fulfilling its intended duties to human rights, especially when the perpetrator and collaborators of rights violation, are ‘friends’ of VETO power holding States, or the said VETO power holding States themselves.

The will of the majority of UN member States in issues of human rights can thus be IGNORED or prevented by the use of the VETO. Of late, this has happened in several countries including Palestine, Myanmar and Ukraine.

The VETO has been used to block UN actions. “Instead of being a vehicle for action, the Security Council has too often become an instrument of deadlock. “We see the consequences in places like Gaza, in the persecution of the Rohingya, and in the war in Ukraine,” he [Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim] said in his keynote address at the Common Action Forum (CAF) 2024.

The abolition of the VETO power will restore true sovereign equality in the United Nations, and will allow the UN to be a more effective tool to act against violation of human rights and injustices.

If perpetrators do not heed the call of the UN to stop human rights violations and restore justice, the UN can then take further actions in the form imposition of sanctions, and even cause the United Nation’s forces to enter into the area of rights violations, to not just protect victims, but to also cause perpetrators to do the needful to restore justice including the return of people back to their land and property, and to ensure justice be done.

VETO power CAN be ABOLISHED …

The VETO power can be abolished, whereby the UN Charter, amongst others, in Article 108 states that ‘Amendments to the present Charter shall come into force for all Members of the United Nations when they have been adopted by a vote of two thirds of the members of the General Assembly and ratified in accordance with their respective constitutional processes by two thirds of the Members of the United Nations, including all the permanent members of the Security Council.’

The VETO power can thus be abolished, if two-thirds of the UN Member States support the move, and the 5 existing Permanent Members with VETO power agrees to it. If any one of the VETO power-holding member State objects, it cannot be done. We hope that no member State will oppose this move to abolish the VETO power.

Therefore, we call of all members of the UN Member States to vote in favor of abolishing the VETO power, and all call on all the VETO power holding States to also support this initiative.

We call on all UN Member States to vote without fear or favour to remove this often abused VETO power, that has made the UN a ‘toothless tiger’ unable to act definitely to defend human rights and restore justice even when an overwhelming majority of UN member States wants the UN  to act;

We also call on all the 5 Permanent Members, being Russia, China, France, United States of America and the UK, to agree to the removal of the VETO powers to restore democracy and sovereign equality within the UN, so that the UN can regain its power to act in the interest of human rights, and

We call all the 5 Permanent Members, being Russia, China, France, United States of America and the UK to adopt a MORATORIUM in using their VETO powers pending the abolition of VETO.

Charles Hector

Koong Hui Yein

 

For and on behalf the 19 organizations/groups/trade unions listed below

 

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement, Malaysia

Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), India

COAC (Center for Orang Asli Concerns), Malaysia

Global Women’s Strike, UK

Global Women’s Strike, US

Legal Action for Women, UK

North South Initiative (NSI), Malaysia

Payday Men’s Network, UK-US

Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India

Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU), Malaysia

Second Chance Redemption, Pakistan

WH4C (Workers Hub for Change)

Women of Colour Global Women’s Strike, UK

Women of Color Global Women’s Strike, US

ALIRAN

National Union of Transport Equipment & Allied Industries Workers (NUTEAIW), Malaysia

Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL), Cambodia

Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM)

 

PM Anwar calls for ban on UNSC veto power in mass atrocities cases, wants global justice reform

United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto power should be banned in cases of mass atrocities until it can be abolished, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. — Bernama pic
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto power should be banned in cases of mass atrocities until it can be abolished, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 2 — United Nations Security Council (UNSC) veto power should be banned in cases of mass atrocities until it can be abolished, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

He said the UNSC decision-making processes require broader support from both permanent and non-permanent members and be subject to ratification by the General Assembly through a simple majority.

Anwar said the veto power has paralysed the council, while the lack of representation from regions such as Africa and Latin America reflects a bygone era.

“Instead of being a vehicle for action, the Security Council has too often become an instrument of deadlock.

“We see the consequences in places like Gaza, in the persecution of the Rohingya, and in the war in Ukraine,” he said in his keynote address at the Common Action Forum (CAF) 2024, here today.

The Prime Minister said the world stands at a critical juncture for global justice, emphasising that Israel’s actions against Palestinians undermine the very foundations of the global order.

“... war crimes, collective punishment, and genocide are a blatant affront to the norms of international law and fundamental human rights,” he said.

As Malaysia has advocated at the UN, Anwar said the world must take bold, immediate steps, starting with an arms embargo on Israel.

However, he said the severity of Israel’s actions warrants more including a global consensus towards suspending or even expelling Israel from the UN.

The UNSC reform is one of the key areas proposed by Anwar that urgently needs to be reformed for a more equitable world.

Other areas are the international financial architecture, international trading system, climate finance and climate justice.

At the UNSC Debate in New York in September, Malaysia made a strong appeal to limit the use of veto power in the UNSC, stressing that the unchecked use of veto has obstructed peace efforts, particularly in the case of Palestine. — Bernama

Malaysia urges UN to curb or abolish veto power

Foreign minister Mohamad Hasan says the UN Security Council must be freed from this humiliating paralysis.

mohamad hasan
Foreign minister Mohamad Hasan said the general assembly should be allowed to serve as the conscience and voice of the world, unimpeded. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA:
The survival of the United Nations hinges on some urgent reforms, especially on the veto power held by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.

In addressing the 80th session of the UN general assembly (UNGA) 2025 in New York yesterday, Malaysian foreign minister Mohamad Hasan said there was a need to limit, if not abolish, the veto power, Bernama reported.

“We must challenge it each and every time that it is wielded, particularly in cases of crimes against humanity.

“Authority must flow back to the general assembly. As the most inclusive body of this house, it should be allowed to serve as the conscience and voice of the world, unimpeded,” he was quoted as saying.

Mohamad urged the organisation to continue to demand accountability from the permanent members of the UN Security Council, referring to the United States, Russia, China, France and the United Kingdom.

“We must pursue results through Resolution 377A: Uniting for Peace. No more shall we quietly accept the dismissal of our collective voice.

“We must question and challenge the veto. We must free the UN Security Council from this humiliating paralysis,” he said.

He added that the UN must remain a relevant and effective international organisation and a global guardian of peace.

On the issue of Israel and its recent actions, Mohamad called for the UN to impose sanctions on Israel, stressing that the metastasis of Zionist regime brutality in the Middle East must not be allowed to continue.

He said Israel’s latest assault on Doha, Qatar, was not merely an attack on a few Hamas representatives but a violation of another state’s sovereignty and an insult to all mediation efforts.

Mohamad added that the strike signalled that Israel’s violence would continue to destabilise the region.

“The atrocities may have begun with Palestine, but they certainly will not end with Palestine. As the Middle East grows ever more dangerous for its residents, we will feel the reverberations all over the world.

“This is why simply advocating for a two-state solution is not enough,” he said, according to Bernama.

He also reiterated Malaysia’s commitment to support the Palestinian people through any measure, including the New York Declaration.

Mohamad said concrete action must also be taken against the occupying force, while long-term support should be prepared to ensure the development of a self-governing Palestinian state.

“The test that we now face is an existential one. After 80 years of the UN, and 77 years of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, if we cannot resolve this, the citizens of the world will lose faith in us and in the international order,” he said. - FMT, 28/9/2025

 

Slovenian president reiterates end to UN Security Council veto power

Slovenian President Dr Natasa Pirc Musar at HBKU yesterday. PICTURE: Thajudheen.
Slovenian President Dr Natasa Pirc Musar at HBKU yesterday. PICTURE: Thajudheen.
 
Slovenian President Dr NataÅ¡a Pirc Musar has reiterated her call to abolish the United Nations (UN) Security Council’s absolute veto power, arguing that the privilege 'corrupts absolutely' and has left the UN in a 'big struggle' to uphold its mission of global peace and security.

“When you do have something absolute, it is always a problem,” she said. “You know what the saying is?, ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. It is so true, also in politics,” Pirc Musar said in her lecture, titled “The Realities of Multipolarism vs the Need for Multilateralism”.

She was speaking at Hamad Bin Khalifa University’s Minaretein Auditorium Monday, addressing global governance, artificial intelligence, and gender equity. The event forms part of her official visit to Qatar and reflected HBKU’s ongoing efforts to foster international dialogue on diplomacy and leadership.

Elected in 2022 as Slovenia’s first woman head of state, Pirc Musar used the platform to make an appeal for UN reform, particularly targeting what she described as the “hybrid war” within the Security Council, where five permanent members – the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China – hold veto powers.

The Slovenian president noted that while France and the United Kingdom have refrained from using the veto since 1986, other permanent members continue to use, and in some cases, abuse the power, stalling collective action in times of global crisis. “For 25 years we have been discussing UN reform. For 25 years we didn’t make any steps,” she added.

Pirc Musar outlined three proposals to curb the Security Council’s unchecked authority: Restricting voting rights of countries under discussion in the Council; banning the use of vetoes in cases involving mass atrocities, crimes against humanity, or genocide; and subjecting veto decisions to review by the UN General Assembly, where a two-thirds majority could overrule or confirm them.

The Slovenian president cited her September address at the UN General Assembly, where Slovenia urged the body to seek an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the legality and limits of the veto power in cases of humanitarian crises. “Now is the time to discuss this really very important topic,” she said, adding that “we don’t have another 25 years to waste.”

Pirc Musar also touched on the interconnectedness of global issues, from wars in Ukraine, Palestine, and Sudan to the ethical implications of artificial intelligence: “Everything is interconnected,” she stressed, adding that knowledge-sharing and cultural dialogue are vital to overcoming political egoism and sustaining multilateral co-operation.

“Knowledge is to be shared and not a single country on this planet has all the knowledge it needs,” she said. “If you only stick to your own country and are not willing to share, that is egoistic.”

Pirc Musar also tackled the theme of gender equity, linking it to the broader struggle for fairness and inclusion in global governance.

Echoing her faith in multilateralism, she described the UN as “the only multilateral body covering the whole planet,” insisting that it “should be the diamond of international politics.” - Arab Times, 10/11/2025

Finland's president wants end of single state veto at UN Security Council

By Anne Kauranen
 
HELSINKI, Sept 18 (Reuters) - Finland's President Alexander Stubb has called for expansion of the U.N. Security Council, abolition of its single state veto power, and suspension of any member engaging in an "illegal war" such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine. .. Reuters, 18/9/2024
 

India to UN: Abolish Security Council veto powers or give them to new permanent members

Pressing its case for a reform of the United Nations Security Council, India has called for an equal voice for all nations—or at least, for permanent members.

Pratik Mathur, a counsellor at India's United Nations Mission addresses the General Assembly on Wednesday, April 26, 2023, on the use of veto powers by permanent members of the Security Council. (Photo courtesy the UN).

Pressing its case for reforming the UN Security Council, India has said that either the veto rights should be abolished or be given also to new permanent members in a reformed Council.

"Either all nations are treated equally in the context of voting rights or else the new permanent members must also be given the veto," Pratik Mathur, a counsellor at India's UN Mission said on Wednesday at the General Assembly.

"Extension of veto to new members, in our view, will have no adverse impact on the effectiveness of an enlarged Council," he said, countering arguments made by some countries against expanding permanent membership.

He said that the question of veto should be addressed as part of a comprehensive reform of the Council through clearly defined timelines in the Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) for reforms.

The IGN has virtually stalled because a small group of countries have manipulated the process to prevent progress, observers believe.

Mathur was speaking at an Assembly debate held on the first anniversary of the landmark resolution requiring a discussion by the Assembly within 10 days of a veto being cast in the Council.

While the Assembly cannot override a veto in the Council, by having a discussion, it hopes to bring moral pressure to bear on the vetoing countries or hold them accountable to the rest of the world.

Mathur said that the veto resolution adopted by consensus "unfortunately, reflected a piecemeal approach to UNSC reform, thereby highlighting one aspect, ignoring [the] root cause of the problem".

The root cause—in the view of India and many countries—is the architecture of the Council that reflects the post-World War II scenario and gives veto-wielding permanent seats to the five victorious Allies (Britain, China, France, the US and now Russia, which holds the seat originally given to the Soviet Union).

Mathur said, "As rightly called out by our African brothers, it goes against the concept of [the] sovereign equality of states and only perpetuates the mindset of World War II: 'To the victor belongs the spoils'.


"Let me flag what our African brothers have repeatedly stated in the IGN: The veto as a matter of principle should be abolished. However, as a matter of common justice, it should be extended to new permanent members so long as it continues to exist."

During the debate, Kenya's deputy permanent representative Michael Kiboino reaffirmed the same point, citing the Common African Position on the Security Council reform.

"If the pursuit of the purposes of the UN Charter is based on the principle of sovereign equality of states, then the veto is a contradiction that should be abolished.

"But if it is to be retained in a reformed Security Council, it must be extended to new permanent members with all its attributes, including the prerogatives and privileges of permanent membership," Kiboino declared.

The most vigorous push for Council reform comes from the 54 nations of Africa, a continent without any permanent members on the Council although the majority of its actions relate to it.

South Africa's permanent representative, Mathu Joyini, said that the Assembly's veto resolution requiring discussions of it "should not be seen as an interim or ad-hoc solution to the need for urgent Security Council reform, which will address the structural challenges within the Council itself".

"We must continue our efforts for urgent Council reform and the revitalisation of the General Assembly. Ultimately, focus should be on giving greater momentum to the reform of the Security Council itself," she added.

The Assembly's resolution in April 2022—on holding debates on vetoes—was adopted after the Council was paralysed by Russia's veto of a resolution in February last year, condemning its invasion of Ukraine.

Russia vetoed another resolution in September condemning its referendums in areas of Ukraine it had annexed.

Last year, Moscow also vetoed a resolution on border crossings for sending aid to rebel-held areas of Syria, and joined China to shoot down a resolution condemning North Korea's intercontinental and other ballistic missile tests.

The Assembly held debates on those three vetoes.

Assembly President Csaba Korosi called the veto resolution "a breakthrough, a gamechanger" that "opened the door for a new form of collaboration and accountability" between the Assembly and the Security Council.

While India has insisted on veto rights for all permanent members in a reformed Council, it had also offered to forgo the veto power temporarily as a compromise.

During an IGN meeting in 2016, Syed Akbaruddin, who was then India's permanent representative, said, "Our own national position has been and remains that the veto should, as long as it exists, be extended to new permanent members. As a measure of flexibility and willingness for compromise, the use of the veto can be deferred till the Review Conference."

The UN Charter provides for a conference to review and amend the veto rights, but such a meeting has never taken place. - National Herald, 29/4/2023

 

China, Russia Again Veto UN Statement on Myanmar Conflict - The Diplomat