Showing posts with label Detention Centres/Jail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Detention Centres/Jail. Show all posts

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Australian Parliament condemns Malaysian-Australian asylum-refugee swap deal

Well, this is about the proposed (or has it been finalized?) agreement between Australia and Malaysia - whereby Australia was to sent to Malaysia about 800 asylum seekers currently in Australia seeking asylum in Australia, and in return Australia agreed to accept 1,000 UNHCR recognized refugees per year for 4 years for re-settlement in Australia.

It would have been good if a similar vote was also cast, where all MPs and Senators could vote on motions without being forced to vote according to what party whips tell them - irrespective of who tabled the motions. It would be good to know exactly the number of MPs/Senators/ADUNs who voted in favour, voted against and abstained with regard to each and every motion.

 

Related posts in this blog:- 

How can Malaysia arrest and detain persons who never broke Malaysian laws?

800 Australian asylum seeker brought into Malaysia to be detained in Semenyih - Is this legal?

The trade of asylum seekers for refugees between Malaysia and Australia (Law Council of Australia)

Source: The World Today, ABC News, 16/6/2011

Parliament condemns Govt on Malaysia asylum deal

 Listen to MP3 of this story ( minutes)
ELEANOR HALL: But we go first today to Canberra, where the House of Representatives this morning passed a motion condemning the Federal Government over its plan to send 800 asylum seekers to Malaysia.

Critically, it was the Greens MP Adam Bandt who proposed the motion, which was supported by the Coalition and the independents Andrew Wilkie and Bob Katter. But the Coalition Leader Tony Abbot challenged the Greens to take their objections to the deal one step further, and force the Government to change its policy.

In Canberra, Sabra Lane reports.

SABRA LANE: The Greens two-part motion was put to the House of Representatives this morning. It called for the condemnation of the proposed asylum deal and its immediate abandonment.

HARRY JENKINS: The result of the division is ayes 70, nos 68. The question is therefore resolved in the affirmative.
SABRA LANE: The Senate had previously passed the motion. In this morning's vote, the Opposition voted in favour of it, with the independents Andrew Wilkie and Bob Katter. The Greens MP Adam Bandt introduced the motion into the House of Reps.

ADAM BANDT: Today is a significant day because for the first time in this Parliament, both Houses of Parliament have passed a motion condemning a policy decision taken by the Government. Use of the word condemn is strong and it is not a step that I took lightly to introduce this motion into the House.

SABRA LANE: The Opposition's immigration spokesman, Scott Morrison.

SCOTT MORRISON: Now, you'll have to check your history books but it has been some time I suspect that both Houses of Parliament have condemned a government policy in this way.

SABRA LANE: And he says Government MPs are guilty of hypocrisy.

SCOTT MORRISON: Those Labor members who have protested and condemned the Howard government for a decade, sat in their seats today glued there just not speaking up, not getting up, sitting silent.

SABRA LANE: But it's a non-binding motion, the Government can't be forced to abandon the policy.

The Immigration Minister Chris Bowen.

CHRIS BOWEN: Well, look the Greens and the Liberal Party have very different positions on this. Of course they have joined into a coalition of convenience this morning and that was well known, it was always going to be the case but if you asked the Greens and the Liberals to agree on a way forward or the Parliament to agree on a way forward, of course they wouldn't be able to. They are diametrically opposed.

SABRA LANE: But the Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says Mr Bowen can't brush it off.

TONY ABBOTT: This is a government which if it persists with the Malaysian people swap, is acting in clear defiance of the Parliament. Now, we are in unchartered waters here. I suppose it is then up to Members and Senators to decide what further sanctions they wish to apply against the Government.

SABRA LANE: And he says if the Greens are serious about their Opposition, they should flex their muscles in their alliance with the Government.

TONY ABBOTT: If the Greens want to be taken seriously, it is not enough to move non-binding resolutions in the Parliament. They are going to have to force some changes on their alliance partner in government.

SABRA LANE: Again, Adam Bandt.

ADAM BANDT: Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has already indicated that she intends to introduce a bill into Parliament that will give the Parliament greater oversight of deals like this and would allow the Parliament to say the Malaysia deal was off and would allow the Parliament to say you cannot send people to a third country and so the test is going to be for the Coalition as to whether they are going to support that bill if they are serious about what they're saying.

SABRA LANE: Again the Opposition's immigration spokesman, Scott Morrison.

SCOTT MORRISON: We'll meet with the Greens but that matter yet hasn't been introduced. It hasn't been debated and there is not a schedule yet for it to be considered so when those things are clear, we'll form a view when the matter is considered in the Parliament.

SABRA LANE: And on ABC24, Mr Bowen warned the Coalition if that bill passes Parliament, this and future governments including the Coalition would have to abide by it.

CHRIS BOWEN: Neither would any other arrangement. If a future government tried to do something with Nauru in future for example, that wouldn't get through the Parliament anyway so we would say that we are using the powers given to us by the Parliament legitimately under the Migration Act.

SABRA LANE: Nearly six weeks ago, the Government announced its Malaysia plan, but it's still not signed.

It's been reported that Australian officials have travelled to Geneva to talk with the UNHCR about it. The Government says there's nothing unusual about that with Mr Bowen saying the agreement will be signed in weeks, once oversight measures have been agreed to.

CHRIS BOWEN: I must say, much more transparent and much more robust arrangements than say for example might have been in the case in Nauru where journalists weren't even allowed in and nobody was allowed in to monitor the arrangements and all this nonsense we hear from Mr Abbott and Mr Morrison about Nauru being more humane, I mean give me a break. I mean that is just complete nonsense and total hypocrisy on behalf of the Liberal Party.

ELEANOR HALL: And that is the Immigration Minister Chris Bowen ending that report by Sabra Lane in Canberra.

Thursday, June 02, 2011

800 Australian asylum seeker brought into Malaysia to be detained in Semenyih - Is this legal?

So, it seems that the 800 asylum seekers from Australia, sent possibly forcibly and without the expressed consent of the said 800, will be placed in Malaysia's Semenyih Detention Centre. There is already a problem of overcrowding, etc at these detention centers. Recently, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention had much to state about these centres - see About Migrants in Malaysia - UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention -8/2/2011. Selected quotes from the report is as follows:- 

"...the Working Group was seriously concerned by the administrative detention regime applied to asylum-seekers, refugees and migrants in an irregular situation..."

"...no special legislation relating to refugees and asylum-seekers in Malaysia, since they are not recognized as such under domestic law; indeed, current legislative framework does not even recognize the terms “refugees” and “asylum-seekers”...."

"...The Government should not use immigration detention for asylum-seekers, refugees and vulnerable groups of migrants, ..."

"...that at least six asylum-seekers and migrants had died of leptospirosis, an infectious disease, in immigration detention camps. In 2009, 14 detainees died in immigration detention centres. ..."

"...Most prisons visited were found to meet international standards and regulations on conditions. This finding does not, however, apply to immigration detention centres...."

"...The regime applied to migrants in an irregular situation, refugees and asylum seekers is not seen to be in line with international human rights law..."    

Let us also not forget the fact is that 29,759 migrants 'caned' in Malaysia between 2005-2010 (9/3/2011) and this information was based on answers given in Parliament.

In a response to a parliamentary question on 9 March, Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein disclosed that Malaysia had caned 29,759 foreigners between 2005 and 2010 for immigration offences alone.

I wonder also the legality of detaining the said 800 from Australia. What Malaysian law did they violate - for certainly their coming into the country is with the blessing and consent of the Malaysian government - so, you cannot even justify detaining them in Malaysian Detention Centres for Undocumented Migrants. This 800 would not have broken any Malaysian law - you cannot just go to another country, pick up people and bring them to Malaysia and then  detain them for being 'illegal' migrants... at these Immigration Detention Centres.  I believe that there is no law that will make this exercise legal...

Malaysia Solution: Semenyih immigration depot a barbed wire home for asylum seekers


Semenyih
Barbed wire ... Malaysia's Semenyih immigration depot / Pic: Stephen Cooper The Daily Telegraph

THIS is the first look at where asylum seekers will be sent under Julia Gillard's proposed swap with Malaysia.

The Semenyih immigration depot, which holds up to 1500 detainees, is usually heavily fortified but The Daily Telegraph simply walked through the front gate.

A riot at the notorious depot presented the perfect opportunity for the Malaysian Home Affairs office to renovate the facility as the new home for 800 Australian asylum seekers.

In return, Australia would accept 4000 processed refugees from Malaysia.

Workers are putting final touches to the compound's buildings. The detention blocks, complete with bars, have been given a new coat of paint, new fencing and the rooms cleaned up in preparation for the new arrivals.

"It is almost finished," a worker said.
 
Lining the compound is 1m-high barbed wire and three giant watchtowers. Further south at Lenggeng detention depot, security has been increased.

A successful Amnesty International mission to expose the dirty conditions that women and children are living in has spooked the Ikatan Relawan Rakyat Malaysia (RELA) paramilitary corps.

The yellow beret-wearing volunteer army is made up of part-time "neighbourhood watch" storm troopers.

Refugee advocates said RELA had recently raided apartment blocks where Burmese immigrants had been hiding. If the Burmese are caught for the second time, they are sent to secretive courts within immigration depots where they are ordered to be caned with a rattan.

At Lenggeng, this reporter was frisked by RELA officers who temporarily confiscated my phone, passport and camera and I was ushered into Commander Salaze's office.

Out the front of the office in two 10m x 15m cages are two groups of Burmese refugees huddled together.

Outside, RELA officers twirl their batons under the hot sun.

"I can't let you in to have a look because we are on a heightened security alert," Commander Salaze said.
He denied the photos released by Amnesty International were taken at the camp but it is understood detainees who commit serious offences are transferred to local prisons where canings take place.

He also laughed off suggestions that 6000 detainees were caned in Malaysia every year: "The caning does not happen in any of the immigration camps, it happens in the prisons."

In April, 109 Burmese refugees scaled the rear wall of the compound and ran into the jungle. Across Malaysia, there are regular riots and mass escapes as the system struggles to cope with the influx of refugees from Burma, Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia.

"We caught most of them but some got away," Commander Salaze said.

Aerial surveillance and tracker dogs were used to hunt them down in the nearby palm oil plantations.

The Daily Telegraph could not get past the front gate of the KLIA compound, near the international airport.

There are more than 800 refugees living there.

Across Malaysia, there are more than 90,000 registered refugees and asylum seekers. - Herald Sun, 1/6/2011, Malaysia Solution: Semenyih immigration depot a barbed wire home for asylum seekers

For more on the Semenyih depot, where asylum seekers will be sent under Prime Minister Julia Gillard's "Malaysian Solution" go to The Daily Telegraph.

 


Tuesday, May 10, 2011

From 'asylum seekers'in Australia to 'illegal immigrants' in Malaysia

So Australia is 'exporting' people who have arrived in Australia and are seeking asylum..to "Malaysia" - but when they arrive in Malaysia, what will happen to them? Is Australia also providing for food and board in some facility to be built in Malaysia - or will they just be released into the local population to fend for themselves, facing the usual RELA, police and other enforcement officers threats of arrest, detention, 'whipping', and maybe even deportation.Of course, there is also the access to healthcare issue - whereby you do need a valid passport - do this people have this? And even then, Malaysia charges 1st class rates to all foreigners, including refugees and asylum seekers. Who then is going to pay for the additional personal needed to look after these persons? Australia? 

Would Malaysia be providing a better or differential treatment to these 'asylum seekers from Australia'? If they do, would that not be going against the Federal Constitution guarantee for equality for all persons (not limited to citizens). What then happens to those who after being processed, are not granted asylum in Australia - will Malaysia have to shoulder this burden? So when Malaysia deports them back to their country of origin, Malaysia will get the 'bad name' - not Australia.

Malaysia already has over-crowded detention centers - and is struggling to cope with possibly more than 5 million undocumented migrants, which include asylum seekers and refugees - and it makes no sense whatsoever. 

Malaysia have no laws that recognizes asylum seekers and/or refugees at this time. Thus, even those that have been processed by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and were successfully granted 'refugee status' are considered illegal immigrants in Malaysia.  

So, when Australia sends their 'asylum seekers' to Malaysia, they automatically become 'illegal immigrants' in Malaysia - 'undocumented migrants'. 

In return, what will Australia do? They will accept 1,000 UNHCR Refugees from Malaysia per year for the next 4 years. Note that Australia already have an obligation to accept refugees - and over the past years, they have an annual quota of accepting 13,450 refugees. Wonder how many they have been accepting from Malaysia? Was it 1,000 or more? Hence, would this 'new agreement' increase or decrease the number of refugees accepted from Malaysia for re-settlement in Australia? In short, Malaysia may be losing out as now the maximum that they will accept from Malaysia have been set at 1,000... and as of September 2010, there was still over 40,000 UNHCR recognized refugees waiting to be re-settled in 3rd countries. Given the current state of Europe, and the situation in the Middle East and Arab nations which is generating even more refugees, there will be lesser chances for resettlement of refugees currently in Malaysia. So, 1,000 refugees per year from Malaysia is a laughable commitment by Australia.
We really need to see the full agreement between Malaysia and Australia to understand why Malaysia accepted to this deal.

What happens to those who are send from Australia who are not successful in getting 'refugee status'? Does Malaysia send them back to Australia - or does Malaysia have to be burdened with this problem? 

Which refugee would Australia accept? After 9/11, many countries are very slow in accepting Muslim refugees. Many countries also want to accept only educated, professional and 'rich' refugees - would it also be the case with Australia? Or will Australia commit to accepting refugees selected randomly - maybe by a 'lottery' system, which would also give equal opportunities for all UNHCR recognized refugees - including Muslim refugees and those others that are not highly educated, professional and 'poor'.

Over 90,000 refugees in Malaysia

Thursday, November 11th, 2010 15:20:00

KUALA LUMPUR: There were 90,301 refugees in Malaysia registered with the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) up to September this year.

Deputy Foreign Minister Datuk A. Kohilan Pillay said Malaysia cooperated with the UNCHR and International Organisation for Migration (IOM) in repatriating refugees to their countries of origin or relocating them to a third country willing to accept them.

"Until now, 49,082 refugees have been sent to third countries, 68 per cent of them through the UNHCR and 32 per cent through IOM," he said in his reply to a question from Hamim Samuri (BN-Ledang) in the Dewan Rakyat, here, today.

Kohilan said issues related to refugees had not been raised by the source countries like Cambodia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Thailand during their bilateral talks with Malaysia.

"However, their embassies here would always assist in the documentation process for refugees to be relocated to third countries," he said.

To a supplementary question from M. Kulasegaran (DAP-Ipoh Barat) on claims that the Malaysian government allowed the exploitatiion of refugees, Kohilan said the UNHCR and IOM were responsible for looking after the registered refugees.

However, he said, Malaysia also assisted in terms of medical aid and educational programmes for them.

He said as there were no special laws for refugees in this country, issues involving them came under the Immigration Act 1959/63 and that refugees were considered as illegal immigrants.- Malay Mail, 11/11/2010, Over 90,000 refugees in Malaysia

Announcements of character tests for refugees and the reintroduction of temporary protection visas (TPVs) are distractions. So too is the recent decision by the Gillard Government of its Malaysian ‘solution’.

The deal between Australia and Malaysia proposes that Australia take 4,000 asylum seekers who have been declared refugees by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) but have not been settled in a host country. Most of the 4,000 refugees Australia is likely to take are Burmese. The rate will be 1,000 a year over four years.

The annual quota for Australia’s refugee intake will increase from 13,750 to 14,750 a year. The increase in the annual quota will reportedly cost the Federal Government $216 million and a further $76 million to fly refugees from Malaysia to Australia.

Costs of the Australian Government’s international advertising campaign with the slogan 'Don’t do it', warning people smugglers and refugees in Indonesia, Afghanistan and Pakistan to resist coming to Australia or risk ending up in Malaysia, have been undisclosed.

Recent protests at Sydney’s Villawood detention centre have again focused the public’s attention on mandatory detention. In response to the protests the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship made it clear that “asylum seekers found to be refugees will lose the right to a permanent visa if convicted of an offence”.  The Minister’s threat to deny or regulate protection of an asylum seeker because of their character distracts society from examining why we are intolerant of refugee protests.

Asylum seekers have the right to seek our protection. There is no requirement that they must accept long periods of detention with humility. The poor conditions of Australia’s detention centres have been well documented and much criticised. Neither character tests nor TPVs will halt the movement of those fleeing persecution nor ensure they accept the criminalisation of their asylum claim.

Reports in the Australian media about the reintroduction of character tests and TPVs seeks to divert attention away from the failures of the Liberal and Labor party’s refugee policies. As Green’s Senator Sarah Hanson-Young correctly acknowledges, TPV’s “won’t stop people rioting in detention centres” and they “won’t stop people making the treacherous voyage”.

Yet, Minister Chris Bowen has recently said: “I think that it’s perfectly appropriate to say to somebody who has misbehaved in a detention centre, "you’re not getting a permanent visa, we’ll look at sending you home, if we can’t send you home for whatever reason at the moment, we might give you a temporary visa but it’s got all these restrictions on it".

Even for a Labor government that maintains a populist hardline on asylum seekers, this is a remarkable statement given Bowen’s previous comments. The 2007 Labor Government, according to Bowen, was elected on a platform that included a more humane treatment of those seeking protection. This included abolishing TPVs, described by the Minister as “the symbol of the former government’s continued punishment of those found to be owed our protection”.

TPVs contravene the 1951 Refugee Convention’s protection mandate. As one migration lawyer recently put it: “the only [TM1] grounds on which refugee protection provisions could be revoked involved crimes against humanity” and “they’re not supposed to be denied protection for criminal matters or detention centre misbehaviour”.

Character tests and TPVs are not the answer to detention protests nor the growing numbers being detained. According to the Refugee Council of Australia there has been a 1,400 per cent increase in long-term detention in just one year. Detainees grew by 196 per cent. Those detained more than six months grew seven times faster (from 258 in March 2010 to 3,901 in March this year).

Regardless of the length of detention – be it two months or two years – criminalising protesting and denying humanitarian protection because of protesting – fails to recognise the illegality and inhumanity of mandatory detention.

Delays in processing lead to overcrowding and frustration. It is this that leads to self-harm and protests. The introduction of a character test to those that engage in “unacceptable behaviour”, including protesting, is designed to send a message to voters that Labor is tough on refugees. Apart from pandering to xenophobic nationalism, it distracts debate from the administrative problems of mandatory detention.

ASIO in 2010, for example, failed to complete security checks on 900 asylum seekers who had found to be genuine refugees, leaving them to languish in detention. It also detracts public attention and scrutiny away from those with mental illnesses, those that self-harm, and the tragedy of deaths in mandatory detention.

The character test built into Australia’s 1958 Migration Act (Section 5C) is already strong. Every refugee must pass the test before they get a visa. New character tests will mean refugees have to jump more hurdles that anyone else. Even if they are granted a TPV, restrictive conditions on family reunion will continue to punish refugees.

The Gillard Government’s plan to deny permanent visas to those caught breaking the law “even if they’re a legitimate refugee” seems legally absurd and morally repugnant.

It also contravenes international law which states asylum seekers “should not be refused refugee status unless they have ‘committed a serious non-political crime’, been involved in ‘war crimes, or crimes against humanity’, or are a serious security risk.”

The Liberal Coalition policy on refugees has been consistent if impractical. According to Tony Abbott the “two things that the Government should be doing today is they should be picking up the phone to the president of Nauru to say, ‘Let’s re-open the centre’ and making TPVs the rule for all people who come illegally by boat.”

Sadly the current problems – increasing numbers of asylum seekers in detention centres, longer lengths of incarceration, and protests – is not seen as a humanitarian issue for the Gillard Government. It is seen as a “perception” issue. Protests have highlighted the Labor Government doesn’t have an effective policy.

This leaves room for conservative commentators to recall deplorable policies such at the expensive and ineffective Pacific Solution. The Government has also realised that the East Timor ‘solution’ will not be accepted (as prime minister Xanana Gusmao had privately acknowledged and which president Jose Ramos-Horta has now publically stated).

It seems Papua New Guinea’s Manus Island and Malaysia are the next stop for Gillard and Bowen.

The best that Labor does is to distract us with character tests, TPVs, and the Malaysian ‘solution’ serve to remind us of Phillip Ruddock.

Jo Coghlan is a lecturer in politics at the School of Social Sciences and International Studies at the University of New South Wales. - Australian Broadcasting Company (ABC News ), 10/5/2011, Labor lured to the Ruddock Solution for refugees

Monday, May 09, 2011

Asylum seekers and refugees are not commodities to be traded (Malaysian Bar)

logo letterhead left-right.png


Press Release
 
Asylum seekers and refugees are not commodities to be traded
The Malaysian Bar is opposed to the recently-announced arrangement agreed to between the Governments of Malaysia and Australia. As we understand the arrangement, Australia will send to Malaysia 800 asylum seekers who have been detained by the Australian authorities. In return, Australia commits itself to accepting for resettlement 4,000 refugees currently in Malaysia, over a period of four years.

The proposed exchange of asylum seekers for refugees between Malaysia and Australia is a misguided approach for dealing with a complex issue with serious ramifications.

It is irresponsible of Australia, as a State Party to the United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees adopted on 28 July 1951 (“Convention”), and its 1967 Protocol, to abdicate its international obligations under the Convention. Through this deal, Australia is consigning 800 people to a life of uncertainty and probable suffering, given that Malaysia is not a State Party to that Convention. Indeed, Malaysian law does not even recognise the concept of asylum seekers or refugees. Instead, it treats all undocumented persons as “illegal immigrants”, and subjects them to imprisonment and whipping.

It is untenable that Australia proposes to “pass the buck”, as it were, for the protection, care and support of these 800 asylum seekers, to Malaysia, when Malaysia has no comprehensive and organised system to provide assistance to asylum seekers or refugees. Even more astounding is the fact that Australia had reportedly rejected the use of an Australian-built processing facility in Nauru because that nation is not a signatory to the Convention, yet has no qualms about transferring asylum seekers to Malaysia.

As it is, Malaysia is already home to almost 100,000 asylum seekers and refugees who have been registered by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Kuala Lumpur. None of these asylum seekers and refugees is provided with any material or financial help by the Malaysian Government for housing, jobs, education or health care. Because Malaysia has not acceded to the Convention, there are currently no legislative or administrative provisions in place for dealing with the situation of asylum seekers or refugees in the country. They exist in a shadow society in which they have no legal rights, and even less protection and security. They live in constant fear of the authorities – the police, immigration personnel and Ikatan Relawan Rakyat Malaysia (“RELA”) members. The Malaysian Bar reiterates its concern that the legal situation and conditions of life of asylum seekers and refugees and their families in Malaysia is degrading, demeaning and dehumanising, and wholly unacceptable to any civilised society.

Thus, the Australian Government is proposing an arrangement under which it has no assurance that the asylum seekers it sends to Malaysia will be treated in accordance with international human rights norms, and in compliance with the principles of the Convention.

The Malaysian Bar calls upon the Australian and Malaysian Governments not to proceed with this arrangement. Instead, our Government must establish a proper and comprehensive framework for dealing with the situation of asylum seekers and refugees who are already in this country, and begin by according such persons due legal recognition. Malaysia must also demonstrate a proven track record of upholding human rights to the highest possible standards.

We wish to clarify that, contrary to the report titled “Pact gives refugees protection” published in today’s New Straits Times (“NST”), we did not say that the proposed plan is “generally a good one” or that “certain things needed to be done first”. Rather, our statement to NST asserted clearly that we are “stunned that Australia would have such an arrangement with Malaysia when Malaysia is not a State Party to the [Convention]”. Neither did we say that “the agreement was an opportunity for Malaysia to become a signatory to the [Convention]”; instead, we highlighted the urgent need for Malaysia to become a State Party to the Convention for the reasons outlined above.


Lim Chee Wee
President
Malaysian Bar

9 May 2011

Wednesday, April 06, 2011

Lenggeng Immigration Depot breakout - Investigate the root causes

When one is oppressed, ...and continue to be oppressed, then after complaints receive not much response - people will protest...and in the case of detainees at Immigration Detention Centres...it may end up as what happened at the Lenggeng Detention Centre...

Now, it is reported that they are investigating the breakout - but hopefully this investigation also includes the root causes for the dissatisfaction of the detainees, that culminated in the riot..the fire...the breakout.

And let us also not forget Malaysia's obligations to undocumented migrant workers..On 23rd April 1999, the Malaysian government together with other ASEAN governments signed THE BANGKOK DECLARATION ON IRREGULAR MIGRATION, and declaration 14 states as follows:-

Irregular migrants should be granted humanitarian treatment, including appropriate health and other services, while the cases of irregular migration are being handled according to law.    Any unfair treatment towards them should be avoided; - BANGKOK DECLARATION ON IRREGULAR MIGRATION
Let us also not forget the deaths by Leptospirosis at these detention centres.

Malaysian Trade Union Congress (MTUC) makes it 26 groups concerned about recent death of 6 Burmese in detention

2 migrants fell sick and died at the KLIA Immigration Depot. Could death have been avoided if the required healthcare was available?

126 groups:- Death of 2 Burmese Indicative of State of Detention Places in Malaysia - Denial of Healthcare Is a Violation of Right to Life 


Why are people being kept at these Detention Centres for so long?  Maximum should be two(2) weeks. Why are the percentage  of undocumented migrants from Burma at our detention centres increasing? Maybe, we should seriously consider documenting these undocumented migrant workers - and getting them jobs in Malaysia, as we certainly still do need many migrant workers. Would that not save the government money - it makes no sense spending so much to detain and deport, when we could solve the problem by just making them all documented migrant workers. Make the procedure for employing migrant workers simpler - let these undocumented migrants go through the existing private employment agencies, and if they get a job - register them, and that solves the problem.

Maybe, Malaysia should also think about the money earned from taxation of income earned by migrants, levy that employers of migrants pay, amount made from remittances services, insurances, etc...and these will also increase the 'coffers' of Malaysia.


SEREMBAN: Police have rounded up 25 of the 105 detainees who escaped from the Lenggeng Immigration Depot for illegals near here on Monday night.

The hunt is on for 80 others who are believed to have escaped to the nearby jungle or oil palm estate.

In the 9.45pm incident, the detainees, the majority of whom are Myanmar nationals, escaped after rioting and setting fire to the upper floor of their detention block.

Short-lived freedom: Some of the runaways who were caught waiting to be transferred to other detention centres at the Lenggeng Immigration Deport near Seremban Tuesday.

State deputy police chief Senior Asst Comm Datuk Abdul Manan Mohd Hassan said 200 personnel from the police field force, air and canine units, Immigration Department and Rela members were involved in the manhunt to track down the runaways.

“We have set up roadblocks in the surrounding areas and at exits leading to Seremban and Semenyih while our air and canine units scour the surrounding areas.

“As at noon today (yesterday), we have rounded up 25 detainees who were found not far from the camp. We are confident all the escapees will be found by Wednesday evening,” he told a press conference at the centre yesterday.

SAC Abdul Manan said 85 of the escapees were Myanmar nationals while the rest were from Iran, Bangladesh, Nepal, Vietnam and Indonesia.

He said the illegals who had been detained at the camp for between three months and a year claimed that they were unhappy with the conditions at their detention block which was overcrowded.

Escape route: The fence which was damaged when 105 detainees made their escape on Monday night.

“The public, especially those living in the area near the camp, are advised to contact the nearest police station if they notice strangers hanging around,” he added.

It is believed that 348 detainees were confined in the detention block which was supposed to house 250 people. No one was injured in the incident.

SAC Abd Manan said as the two-storey block was damaged in the blaze, some of the detainees would now be moved to other detention centres.

There are a total of 925 detainees in the depot, including 192 females.

Meanwhile, Home Ministry secretary-general Datuk Seri Mahmood Adam said a committee comprising the Immigration Detention Centres Department, Prisons Department, Rela and the Civil Defence Department and police had been formed to investigate the breakout.

Immigration Detention Centres director-general Datuk Azri Yusof said none of its officers was injured.

“They could not stop the detainees from running away as there were too many of them,” he said.

He said the department was in the process of upgrading the centre when the incident happened.- Star, 6/4/2011, 105 escape from detention depot, 25 nabbed

Tuesday, April 05, 2011

109 escape from detention - No choice but to break out? or attract attention?

Let's get beyond the fire - and look at the main reasons for this incident at the Immigration Detention Centre, and again we see.. 
"Investigations show that they were dissatisfied with what they perceived as cramped living conditions, the food and long detention periods," he said.

Abdul Manan said it may well be that many of them had lost patience over the long process needed to settle them in third countries under the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR).
 


109 Immigrants Escape From Detention Centre

SEREMBAN, April 5 (Bernama) -- A group of 109 immigration detainees rioted and set a building on fire before escaping from the Lenggeng Immigration Detention Centre last night.

Using aerial surveillance and tracker dogs, the authorities managed to capture 23 of them.


Negeri Sembilan deputy police chief Datuk Abdul Manan Mohd Hassan said besides burning down a building, the group also rammed a nearby gate.


"We've set up a special team to determine how the fire was started. They made their escape via the oil palm plantation located behind the facility," he told reporters at the scene here Tuesday.


He was confident that more escapees would be apprehended as they had only the dark forest cover to evade the authorities and, during the daytime, it would be difficult for them to access public transport due to road blocks, police cars patrolling the area as well as aerial surveillance.


Abdul Manan disclosed that most of the escapees were Myanmar nationals who were joined by a handful of Bangladeshis, Nepalese, Iranians, Vietnamese and Thais.


"Investigations show that they were dissatisfied with what they perceived as cramped living conditions, the food and long detention periods," he said.


Abdul Manan said it may well be that many of them had lost patience over the long process needed to settle them in third countries under the United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR).


"Some of them have been in detention for three to 12 months," he said.


The facility had 348 male and 192 women detainees at the time of the incident. None of the women were involved.


Four fire engines were at the scene to control the blaze. There were no reports of injuries.


--
BERNAMA, 5/4/2011, 109 Immigrants Escape From Detention Centre

Illegal immigrants set fire to Malaysia detention centre; 109 escape but 30 recaptured
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — A Malaysian official says more than 100 illegal immigrants escaped from a detention centre after starting a fire that partially gutted the facility.

Home Ministry official Mohamed Asri Yusof says authorities recaptured 30 of the 109 detainees who broke out of the camp in central Negri Sembilan state late Monday. Most are from Myanmar.

Mohamed Asri said Tuesday authorities are unsure how the detainees managed to start a blaze. About 1,000 other detainees remain in custody, and no injuries were immediately reported.

The incident could refocus attention on conditions at detention centres. Activists have long said such facilities are overcrowded with detainees awaiting deportation after being arrested for illegally entering Malaysia or overstaying. - The Canadian Press, 5/4/2011, Illegal immigrants set fire to Malaysia detention centre; 109 escape but 30 recaptured

Friday, March 11, 2011

About Migrants in Malaysia - UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention -8/2/2011

Below are selected extracts only concerning migrants in Malaysia, for the full Report of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (Malaysia) - 8/2/2011 report go here


Report of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention on its Mission to Malaysia (7–17 June 2010) - 8 February 2011

“…Detention under immigration powers does not seem to be in line with international human rights law. The Working Group considers that the detention of migrants should be decided upon by a court of law, on a case-by-case basis, and pursuant to clear and exhaustively defined criteria in legislation under which detention may be used. The Working Group received complaints of detainee abuse, inadequate food, water, medical care and poor sanitation in most immigration detention centres. The situation at the overcrowded Lenggeng detention centre is especially highlighted. The Working Group expresses its concern at the caning of immigrants in an irregular situation and the powers extended to the Ikatan Relawan Rakyat Malaysia (RELA) volunteer force to be present in immigration detention centres and to track down foreigners living in Malaysia without valid documents.

The Working Group also recommends that the Government change its laws and policies related to the detention of asylum-seekers, refugees and migrants in an irregular situation, so that detention is decided upon by a court of law, on a case-by-case basis and pursuant to clearly and exhaustively defined criteria; rule out systematic immigration detention of vulnerable groups of migrants; and provide in all cases for automatic periodic review by a court of law on the necessity and legality of detention, as well as an effective remedy for detainees. Lastly, the Working Group recommends that the Government of Malaysia strengthen the status, powers and functions of the national human rights institution SUHAKAM, in accordance with the Paris Principles.”

G. Detention pursuant to immigration powers
65.       With regard to detention outside the context of criminal law, during its visit, the Working Group was seriously concerned by the administrative detention regime applied to asylum-seekers, refugees and migrants in an irregular situation. In a population of around 28 million, between 3 to 4 million are foreign immigrants. It is estimated that at least half of them are in an irregular situation or without the necessary documentation. Malaysia is a transit point for asylum-seekers, particularly those from Afghanistan and Myanmar. Some 90,000 foreigners have refugee status as determined by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and mainly live in Kuala Lumpur. A significant number of migrants from, inter alia, Bangladesh, Indonesia and Nepal also live in the country without authorization.

66. There is no special legislation relating to refugees and asylum-seekers in Malaysia, since they are not recognized as such under domestic law; indeed, current legislative framework does not even recognize the terms “refugees” and “asylum-seekers”. It is understood that any non-citizens of Malaysia entering the country without the necessary documents and permits are categorized as illegal migrants, dealt with according to the relevant laws and punished accordingly.

67. Illegal migrants are detained under the Immigration Act for the purposes of making inquiries or investigations into an offence under the law, and also for removing from Malaysia any foreigners who violate the provisions under the Act.

68. While immigrants in an irregular situation are subjected to mandatory detention under the Immigration Act, they do have some recourse to a court law. Article 5 of the Federal Constitution provides that detained persons should not be detained for more than 24 hours without authorization by a magistrate, although in the case of immigrants, this period is extended to 14 days. Migrants are detained by order of the Director General of Immigration and, under the criminal Procedure Code, by a magistrate. Detention of migrants in a prison is governed by the Prisons Regulations (2000), which contain safeguards on fundamental liberties, inter alia the rights to food, clothing, medical examination and treatment, education and recreation, the right to visits and communication.

69. The Government has not ratified the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees or the Protocol thereto. The Government has yet to put in place a national legal and administrative framework for dealing with asylum-seekers and refugees. While the Government does not restrict the access of undetained asylum-seekers to the Office of UNCHR, it does nothing to facilitate access and, as part of its immigration enforcement efforts, often arrests and detains asylum-seekers and refugees.

70. Although Malaysia is not a party to the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the Protocol thereto, Malaysia has fulfilled its international obligations to persons who have entered Malaysia claiming to be refugees and asylum-seekers through special arrangements on humanitarian grounds with UNHCR.

71. Persons committing offences under the immigration laws (either travelling without travel documents or committing criminal offences) are detained by the relevant authorities. However, section 8 (3) of the Immigration Act 1959/63 also sets out to determine persons categorized and prohibited from entering Malaysia. In the event, however, that such offenders are from vulnerable groups, including minors, families with minor children, pregnant women, elderly persons, persons with disabilities and other such persons, the authorities are required, on the basis of humanitarian grounds, to take all reasonable measures to treat such persons with appropriate care and attention.

72. The Working Group believes that detention of migrants should be decided upon by a court of law, on a case-by-case basis, and pursuant to clearly and exhaustively defined criteria in legislation under which detention may be used. The Government should not use immigration detention for asylum-seekers, refugees and vulnerable groups of migrants, including unaccompanied minors, families with minor children, pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, or people with serious and/or chronic physical or mental health problems.

73. In all cases, immigrants should be provided with automatic periodic review by a court of law of the necessity and legality of their detention at any time.

74. Refugees and asylum-seekers are prosecuted for immigration-related offences and may be indefinitely detained at immigration detention centres or deported. Malaysia has no laws or regulations relating to the status of refugees and asylum-seekers in line with international standards. The 24 hours allowed for the police to bring a detainee before a magistrate becomes 2 weeks in the case of a foreigner detained under immigration laws.

75. In the absence of national refugee legislation, UNHCR performs core protection functions, including registration of asylum-seekers, determination of refugee status, issuance of identification documentation and promotion of solutions, including voluntary return, local integration or resettlement in a third country. UNHCR performs these functions, however, as a result of the Government’s unwillingness to perform what are clearly State functions of asylum management. UNHCR does so in the absence of a comprehensive legal and administrative framework for managing asylum-seekers.

76. The Government believes that the issue of refugees and asylum-seekers requires commitments from all States to cooperate in addressing the problems of the mass influx of refugees and asylum-seekers faced by many countries, including Malaysia. Such commitments would need to take into account the resources available of each State and their relevant domestic laws and migration policies. States should take measures jointly to eliminate the problems that give rise to persons having to migrate from their country of origin. Apart from addressing the issue of refugees, efforts need to be made to assist the countries of origin to alleviate the root causes of why their people migrate to other countries; only then would the international community to be able address the problem of refugees and migration as a whole.

77. The capacity of the 13 immigration detention centres in the country is around 6,000 places. All centres are under the control of the Immigration Department. Approximately 10,000 people were deported in 2009.

78. The Government is working to address the issue of overcrowding, the number of detainees has been reduced to an average of 4,500 to 4,800 from the total capacity of 6,640 of all detention centres. Cooperation with non-governmental organizations and international bodies is vital to improve management of immigration detention centres. The Government is therefore working closely with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and organizations such as Buddhist and Shelter.

79. The Government recognized that there is a need to improve conditions in immigration detention centres. It is taking steps such as by establishing a new set-up comprising personnel from various departments. The Government is also currently looking at emulating best practices in detention centre management of other countries such as Australia and the Netherlands. An additional allocation of RM100 million was recently approved by the Government to upgrade physical conditions and renovations of the centres concerned.

80. The Working Group was informed that at least six asylum-seekers and migrants had died of leptospirosis, an infectious disease, in immigration detention camps. In 2009, 14 detainees died in immigration detention centres. 

81. Capacity at Lenggeng detention centre is 1,250, including a block for 250 women. As a transit place, detainees should stay for a maximum of 14 days for investigation. The Working Group found evidence of overcrowding, insufficient access to potable water, poor sanitation and inadequate medical care. Allegations were received of inadequate food and lack of ventilation. The unsanitary and overcrowded conditions facilitated the transmission of communicable diseases, particularly skin diseases. Three detainees died during the first five months of 2010. Some detainees also stated that the overcrowding often led to confrontations and fighting between the detainees, with very limited or no intervention at all from the security guards.

82. The Working Group found a 14-year-old boy who had been in the centre since June 2008. He stated that he was born in Malaysia, although his documents indicated that he was Indonesian, as both his parents are Indonesian. He was adopted by a Malaysian family after his parents returned to Indonesia in 2006. His adoptive family had not visited him since 2009. He has no bed in his cell and was uncertain about his future.

83. According to the Government, all immigrants are subject to the same criminal justice system in Malaysia; detainees may therefore challenge the necessity and legality of their detention at any time. This is a common principle of the criminal justice system in Malaysia. Migrants who are found in an irregular situation (without valid travel documents) or commit an offence are charged in court. After the sentence period has been served, migrants are kept in immigration detention centres until deportation. The Working Group reminds the Government that it is an obligation of the State to guarantee the right to safety of all foreigners when it decides to place them in detention.

84. In Sabah, concern was also expressed at the detention of foreign children whose parents had been deported. 

85. Migrants found to have violated immigration laws are liable to imprisonment, substantial fines and, in some cases, caning. Since 2002, caning has been used to punish immigration offences, such as illegally entering the country. The Working Group was informed that most of the 10,000 people caned each year are immigrants in an irregular situation.

86. Upon the conclusion of its visit, the Working Group was informed that no migrant in detention was denied the necessary medical treatment.

V. Conclusions

92. Most prisons visited were found to meet international standards and regulations on conditions. This finding does not, however, apply to immigration detention centres.

100. The regime applied to migrants in an irregular situation, refugees and asylum seekers is not seen to be in line with international human rights law. Immigrants in an irregular situation arriving in the country are subjected to mandatory detention without genuine recourse to a court of law. The conditions of detention at most of the immigration detention centres visited adversely affect the ability of detainees to challenge the lawfulness of their detention. The Working Group received complaints of detainee abuse, inadequate food, water and medical care, and poor sanitation in the immigration detention centres.

101. The Working Group expresses its concern about the excessive powers granted to the non-official organization RELA, particularly its activities concerning asylum seekers, refugees and migrants in an irregular situation. The Working Group received allegations of ill-treatment and beatings by RELA militants.

103. The Working Group further expresses its concerns about the situation of overcrowding in prisons, but mainly in immigration detention centres.

A. General recommendations

105. The Government should increase its efforts to develop a human rights culture in Malaysia. The judiciary should train magistrates, judges and prosecutors in international human rights law in order to increase the capacity of applying international human rights principles and standards in the resolution of judicial cases.

106. The Government should become a party to the main international instruments on human rights, particularly the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the Protocol thereto, the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons, the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

107. The Government should also study the possibility of becoming a party to the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families and the Optional Protocol thereto, as well as of revising the reservations and declarations it made to those conventions to which it is a State party.

C. Concerning detention under immigration powers

117. Regardless of immigration status, nobody should be subjected to arbitrary detention or appalling detention conditions. The Government is reminded that it is its responsibility to guarantee the right to physical and psychological integrity and the right to security in immigration detention centres. 

118. The Government should ratify the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the Protocol thereto, and put in place a national legal and administrative framework for dealing with asylum-seekers and refugees that meets international standard


119. The Government should also rule out detention of asylum-seekers and refugees as well as vulnerable groups of migrants, including unaccompanied minors, families with minor children, pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, people with serious and/or chronic physical or mental health problems.

120. The Government should, in all cases, provide for automatic periodic review by a court of law on the necessity and legality of detention.

121. The Government should also provide for an effective remedy for detainees to challenge the necessity and legality of detention at any time of the detention period and ex post facto, and define the circumstances.

122. As long as there is a regime of mandatory administrative detention for migrants in an irregular situation, the Government should legally define its maximum period rather than basing it on Government regulations or policy.

123. The Government should also provide for a system of legal aid for immigration detainees.

124. The Government should assume the responsibility of improving the conditions in immigration detention centres as a matter of urgency.

125. RELA, as a volunteer force, should not be used for law enforcement nor for guarding immigration detention centres.