Thursday, July 30, 2026

Tabung Haji RCI Report 'delayed' WHY? - PM Anwar and MADANI to be blamed - if 'monies' wrongly given out not yet recovered, and wrongdoers/criminals YET to be acted upon?

Anwar and MADANI government must shoulder BLAME in delay in disclosing the RCI, not taking steps to recover monies, not investigating/prosecuting the criminal liable, etc - they had 3 years PLUS, and they failed?  

The Lembaga Tabung Haji Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) commenced on July 14, 2021, when the Cabinet approved its formation, and completed/ended its inquiry report in July 2022. 

Thus, it was classified 'SECRET' and not disclosed transparently to the Malaysian public by then Prime Minister Ismail Sabri of PN government.

Follow the Charles Hector channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6UokfB4hdNugYmph1B 

When Anwar Ibrahim became PM in November 2022, he had the power to declassify the RCI Report - and only now, after about 3 YEARS 8 MONTHS decided to finally disclose this very important RCI report - WHY NOW? Was it part of the Negeri Sembilan State Election strategy that reveals the fault of the Barisan Nasional regime that caused losses? 

Even though classified 'secret' - the Prime Minister and maybe all Cabinet members would have known the contents of the RCI - thus, they could have acted on it - to (1) Recover monies wrongly paid on as 'bonuses' to Directors and employees when Tabung Haji(and its subsidiaries) did not have PROFITS - but registered losses. VERY ODD - because dividends are paid out if there are PROFITS, and so too will bonuses to Directors and employees. How much are we talking about? Millions or Billions?

Now, the Tabung Haji is under the  Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs) - and this Minister like any other Minister or Deputy Minister is chosen by the then sitting Prime Minister ONLY according to the Federal Constitution - thus the PRIME MINISTER is ultimately responsible - and until GE14(2018) - it was Najib Razak. [It is absurd to suggest that any MINISTER is incompetent or incapable of dealing/monitoring matters about monies, investments, bonus, dividends - if he/she is so, then he/she should NEVER be appointed MINISTER who is responsible for ALL aspects of institutions/departments/agencies under said Minister's RESPONSIBILITY - we need quality MINISTERS > and the proposal of Parliamentarian approval before any Minister is appointed is a GOOD suggestion]

Tabung Haji and its many subsidiaries should not have been able to make any decisions without the approval of the said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs).  Thus, the said Minister is RESPONSIBLE - and so is the Prime Minister and/or the Cabinet??

Now, the RCI recommended  splitting Tabung Haji's oversight. Under the proposal, the Religious Affairs Minister will retain control over Hajj operations, while the Finance Minister will take over the fund's multi-billion ringgit financial investments. > But has Anwar or the MADANI government acted on this and proposed needed amendments to the TABUNG HAJI ACT 1995 > No, they have not acted on this yet.

What did the RCI reveal - see what AI says.. 

Unjustified Payouts & Excessive Bonuses (AI search results)
  • Illegal Dividends (Hibah): TH distributed a high 4.5% annual profit distribution and 1.75% Hajj hibah (totaling RM2.75 billion) in 2017 despite depleting its reserves and violating its governing Act, which forbids payouts during a deficit. [1, 2]
  • Excessive Bonuses: Tens of millions of ringgit in unauthorized bonuses were paid out. In 2014, a two-month "special bonus" was awarded on top of an 11-month performance bonus while the institution was in a financial deficit. [1]

WRONG PAYOUTS can be recovered - but what has Anwar and the MADANI government done thus far since November 2022? How much of the said monies have been recovered to date? 

4. Problematic Investments (AI search results)
  • Flawed Decisions: Investment decisions suffered from poor coordination between the Chief Investment Officer, CFO, and Treasury.
  • 14 Troubled Portfolios: The RCI recommended immediate forensic audits into 14 problematic assets. The largest failure was in FGV Holdings Bhd, accumulating an unrealized loss of RM1.059 billion. Other major wiped-out investments included Trurich Resources (RM364.31 million impairment) and TH Marine (RM278 million impairment). [1]

Again, has Anwar and the MADANI government done these forensic audits YET - necessary to reveal other losses, and other wrongdoings?

1. Masked Financial Deficits & "Creative Accounting" (AI search results)
  • Hidden Losses: TH operated with a continuous asset-liability deficit starting in 2014. [1]
  • True 2017 Position: Under full financial standards (MFRS), TH should have recorded a net loss of RM1.4 billion in 2017 instead of the reported RM3.4 billion profit. [1]
  • Impairment Failures: The fund failed to record massive declines in asset values for its property investments and underperforming subsidiaries. [1]
  • Unearned Income: TH illegally booked dividend income from subsidiaries that had not actually paid those dividends. [1]

Thus, by paying out DIVIDENDS, Tabung Haji 'LIED' about its financial position - a serious BREACH OF TRUST issue - they should have been HONEST and TRANSPARENT and tell Malaysians about its FINANCIAL situation and predicament.

Must we now look at Amanah Saham Nasional (and other Trust Funds), KWSP, KWAP, etc ...and see if the DIVIDENDS paid out was based on PROFITS and financial position. OR HAVE THE PEOPLE BEEN DECEIVED - all because government wanted to represent that it was doing a GOOD JOB in governance of nation. WERE LOANS taken out to cover dividend payouts? 

ALL in all, TRUST in Government has ERODED ...

What has happened to those who BROKE THE LAW - have they been investigated, charged and TRIED in Court yet? Looks like NOT, because our Communication Minister said...only NOW will law enforcement be asked to act???

He[Government spokesman Datuk Seri Fahmi Fadzil] said the Cabinet had also agreed for enforcement agencies to immediately begin comprehensive investigations based on the report. "Parties involved will be brought to court if there are any violations of the law," he said. - NST, 29/7/2026

This means that Anwar and the MADANI government sat on the RCI report - and DID NOT even BEFORE ask law enforcement to investigate with a view of charging those who broke the LAW. This should have been done, soon after the RCI Report was out in June 2022, or at least soon after Anwar became Prime Minister at the end of 2022...

The people were left in the DARK as we did not even know the findings of the RCI until just now...

Can we say that this 'COVER UP' was to protect CRIMINALS? If Anwar did not reveal this RCI REPORT now, and then BN came back into power after GE16, would that government reveal the RCI REPORT - more so, since the problems arises during the BN Rule that ended in 2018 in GE14.

In my opinion, a ROYAL COMMISSION OF INQUIRY REPORT must IMMEDIATELY be revealed to the people - PM or Cabinet cannot for any reason HIDE the Report from the People...?? Was it a DEAL that Anwar had to make with BN when BN decided to join PH to form the MADANI government?

Azam Baki investigation was done by a Cabinet Select Committee - and that the Cabinet can arguably hide from the people but SHOULD not > BUT certainly NOT a Royal Commission of INQUIRY report/findings? If the PM/Cabinet can hide RCI Report/Findings > WHY should we ever ask for an RCI anymore?

ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY must be observed by government, more so a DEMOCRATIC Government > where the people chose the Members of Parliament, and these MPs choose the Prime Minister.

HAS Official Secrets have been ABUSED by Anwar and the MADANI government in this case, in my opinion. AND, one may ask 'FOR WHAT REASON?' in this case as the RCI was only investigating matters until 2020 - long before PM Anwar Ibrahim and the MADANI Government?

In the case of UMNO's Ismail Sabri, maybe it was to protect BN leaders and political leaders of past who were involved - BUT why did ANWAR not declassify it as soon as he became Prime Minister is the question? 

HOPEFULLY, it was not for 'some deals' or to be used as a 'potential threat in the event that they cease to be loyal to Anwar' - WE wont know WHY the DELAY - maybe Anwar Ibrahim and/or Communication Minister Fahmi Fadzil should TELL US...  

If something happens like 1MDB, and now Tabung Haji, the Malaysian people and PARLIAMENT deserves to know soon as possible - NO COVER UP Please.

It must be noted that Pakatan Harapan government is not implicated as bonus payouts seems to be based on financial capabilities... 

However, the commission noted that from the beginning of the 2018 financial year to date, the granting of bonuses to employees has been controlled according to Tabung Haji’s financial capabilities.

BUT, then the RCI only looked until 2020 - so what is the situation of Tabung Haji and its many subsidiaries after that from 2021 to 2026 > do we need another RCI or maybe some Parliamentary Committee to look into this.

It is good to BAR active politicians from being appointed as Directors, CEOs or Management of Tabung Haji and its many subsidiaries > BUT better still NO MORE political appointees too. The selection should be the BEST CLEAN people to be Directors, CEO and management.

Anwar Ibrahim certainly do not have a track record of finding GOOD PEOPLE - not since his chosen POLITICAL Secretary has been charged in Court, and another past Political Secretary is subject to 'allegations' of wrongdoings. 

Maybe, Parliament should be the one vetting and approving persons to be appointed Directors,CEOs, etc of Tabung Haji, its subsidiaries...and in fact all GLCs, government Commissions like MACC and MCMC. Independent vetting and approval needed also for all law enforcement heads, Public Prosecutor ...

Even when it comes to RCI - the Commissioners must be INDEPENDENTLY selected ...and the COMMISSIONS OF ENQUIRY ACT 1950 (REVISED 1973) need to amended to make it MANDATORY that the findings of the RCI must be forthwith published and made available to the PUBLIC > No more 'SECRETS' and no more DELAYS in informing the Public the findings of any RCI. 

 

 

### The text in purple above are from AI search results - which also cites sources, but AI results can be wrong > so best check and verify please  

Tabung Haji RCI report declassified - Fahmi

By Hakim Mahari
July 29, 2026 @ 2:25pm
facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
whatsapp sharing button

KUALA LUMPUR: The Cabinet today agreed to declassify and release the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report into Tabung Haji, ending years of speculation over findings into the pilgrims fund's management between 2014 and 2020.

Government spokesman Datuk Seri Fahmi Fadzil said the decision was made after the Cabinet received a briefing from Tabung Haji's top management and deliberated on the RCI findings.

He said the report would be made public today and would also be tabled and debated at a special Dewan Rakyat sitting in the near future.

"The Cabinet noted that the report contains 25 recommendations for improvements, of which 75 per cent have already been implemented by Tabung Haji's management," Fahmi said in a statement today.

He said the Cabinet had also agreed for enforcement agencies to immediately begin comprehensive investigations based on the report.

"Parties involved will be brought to court if there are any violations of the law," he said.

Fahmi, who is also Communications Minister, said the Cabinet also took note that Tabung Haji had declared a 3.5 per cent profit distribution for the 2025 financial year, reflecting an improved financial and operational position.

Earlier, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim confirmed that the Cabinet had discussed the release of the RCI report.

When approached by reporters after attending the GBA-Asean Conference on Energy Transition and Integration at Sunway Resort Hotel, Anwar replied briefly: "Yes, yes."

The government had previously indicated that the decision on whether to publish the report would be made by the Cabinet.

Last week, Anwar said the report could be released immediately if Cabinet approval was not required, but indicated that the matter would be decided at the Cabinet meeting.

He said the release had previously been delayed as Tabung Haji was still undergoing financial recovery, with the government seeking to avoid undermining public confidence or alarming depositors.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Religious Affairs) Datuk Dr Zulkifli Hasan had earlier told the Dewan Negara that the proposal to publish the RCI report would be presented to the Cabinet for a final decision.

The RCI was established in 2021 to investigate Tabung Haji's management and operations following concerns over its financial position, including an estimated RM11 billion gap between its assets and liabilities, as well as alleged breaches of the Tabung Haji Act.

Following the 2018 general election, government reviews found that Tabung Haji had RM70.3 billion in assets against RM74.4 billion in liabilities as at Dec 31, 2017.

The government also raised concerns that profit distributions had continued despite liabilities exceeding assets.

As part of efforts to restore the institution's financial position, underperforming assets were transferred to Urusharta Jamaah Sdn Bhd, a special-purpose vehicle wholly owned by the Minister of Finance Incorporated, under a restructuring exercise approved by the government. NST, 29/7/2026

RCI: Governance failures, politics, 'creative accounting' led to Tabung Haji's financial crisis
Alyaa Alhadjri
Published:  Jul 29, 2026 9:38 PM
Updated: 11:08 P

The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Lembaga Tabung Haji has identified serious governance failures, political interference, and questionable accounting practices that contributed to the pilgrimage fund’s financial difficulties between 2014 and 2020.

In its report, the six-member commission chaired by former chief justice Raus Sharif said weaknesses in the Tabung Haji Act 1995 gave excessive powers to the minister in charge of religious affairs, particularly over appointments to the fund’s board and senior management.

The absence of clear qualification and expertise requirements allowed active politicians to become involved in the institution’s management, undermining its credibility and influencing decisions over hibah payments and financial assistance.

The RCI panel also recommended amending the law to prohibit active politicians from holding leadership positions in Tabung Haji or its subsidiaries.

It also proposed specific selection criteria for board members, including relevant professional experience and expertise.

Wearing many, many hats

The report found that board members and senior executives frequently held positions as directors or chairpersons of numerous subsidiary companies.

This divided their attention from their core responsibilities and created conflicts of interest, it said.

The report named Tabung Haji’s former board member and CEO, Ismee Ismail, who held positions in seven Tabung Haji subsidiaries and three more after his tenure ended in June 2016.

It also named another former board member, Johan Abdullah, who also served as the group managing director and Tabung Haji CEO from June 2016 to June 2018.

He was found to have held positions in 19 subsidiary companies.

Former board member Zukri Samat, who also served as the group managing director and Tabung Haji CEO between July 2018 and August 2019, was found to hold positions in four subsidiaries.

“The commission was informed by Zukri that he had relinquished those positions to avoid a conflict of interest while leading the management of Tabung Haji,” the report said.

Nik Hasyudeen Yusoff, who was a board member, group managing director, and Tabung Haji CEO between Sept 1, 2019 and May 5, 2021, was found to be involved in four subsidiaries.

The RCI found that Amrin Awaluddin, who has been serving as a Tabung Haji board member, group managing director, and CEO since May 6 to date, holds positions in three subsidiaries.

Rozaida Omar, who served as Tabung Haji’s senior general manager (finance) and group chief financial officer from August 2004 to April 2021 before being reappointed as general manager of its human capital department, also acted as its proxy representative in 21 subsidiaries during her tenure as senior general manager (finance).

Abd Kadir Sahlan, who was Tabung Haji’s chief investment officer from June 2010 to 2018, was found to be a board member in three Tabung Haji subsidiaries.

‘Creative accounting’

The RCI said Tabung Haji faced a serious financial crisis in 2017, which was aggravated by what it described as “creative accounting”.

Among others, the institution allegedly applied inconsistent impairment policies and failed to record substantial losses to support the payment of high hibah between 2014 and 2017, during which Baling MP Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim was in charge, and Najib Abdul Razak was prime minister.

This included RM227.81 million in impairments involving subsidiaries that were not recognised in its accounts.

The practices contributed to a widening gap between Tabung Haji’s assets and liabilities, the report said.

No names were mentioned in the orders relating to the creative accounting.

The commission also criticised shortcomings in regulatory and audit oversight.

It said the auditor-general was not sufficiently assertive in auditing Tabung Haji’s financial statements, particularly over an “emphasis of matter” in the 2017 accounts that should have been treated as a serious case of non-compliance.

Bank Negara Malaysia’s supervision of the institution was also found to be inconsistent with the provisions of the Tabung Haji Act.

Loss-making investments

The RCI highlighted several investments that resulted in significant losses and recommended forensic audits.

These included investments involving PT TH Indo Plantations, TH Properties Sdn Bhd, and FGV Holdings Bhd.

The report said some investments were pursued under Tabung Haji’s ambition to become a “pillar of the ummah’s economy”, despite the institution lacking sufficient expertise in sectors such as large-scale plantations and property development.

It recommended that Tabung Haji concentrate on fund management and avoid high-risk or strategic investments outside its core competencies.

The commission also proposed dividing ministerial oversight of the institution.

Under the recommendation, the religious affairs minister would be responsible for haj operations, while the finance minister would oversee investments and fund management.

An independent body should also be established to advise the prime minister on appointments to the Tabung Haji board, the report said.

Private auditors proposed

The report recommended that Tabung Haji appoint private accounting firms instead of relying on the auditor-general to audit its financial statements.

It said hibah payments should only be approved based on completed and audited annual financial statements, rather than provisional or pro forma (provided as a matter of courtesy) accounts.

The RCI also proposed establishing a dedicated haj fund to manage haj-related investments under the supervision of the Securities Commission.

To address rising haj costs, the commission recommended increasing the minimum savings required for depositors to qualify for the pilgrimage.

It also said haj subsidies should be targeted only at depositors who genuinely require financial assistance.

The report called for forensic audits into previous investments and for disciplinary or legal action to be taken against board members or senior executives found to have committed wrongdoing.

The RCI concluded that Tabung Haji’s existing institutional structure should be maintained, but said its governance and operations required urgent and fundamental reforms to protect depositors’ savings and ensure its long-term sustainability.

The RCI panel also comprises former chief secretary to the government Samsudin Osman, RHB Group founder Abdul Rashid Hussain, Cariasean Research and Advocacy chairperson Munir Abdul Majid, Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah vice-chancellor Asmadi Mohamed Naim, and certified accountant Norsyahrin Hamidon.

The commission’s secretary was then-Jakim deputy director-general for policy Hakimah Yusoff.

It was also assisted by three conducting officers from the Attorney-General’s Chambers - Asmah Musa, Nazran Sham, and Budiman Lutfi Mohamed. - Malaysiakini, 29/7/2026

Tabung Haji must recover RM2.19m bonuses paid without proper approval: RCI
Yiswaree Palansamy
Published:  Jul 30, 2026 7:00 AM
Updated: 6:47 A

The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Tabung Haji has called for the recovery of RM2.19 million in bonuses paid to selected directors and officers of TH Properties Sdn Bhd, after finding that they were approved without following the required legal procedures.

In its 252-page report released last night, the RCI said bonus payments made by TH Properties in 2017 and 2018 had breached provisions under the Companies Act 2016, as the necessary approvals and shareholder resolutions were not obtained.

According to the report, TH Properties in 2020 consulted law firm MD Tajuddin & Co regarding the bonus payments in 2017 and 2018.

The commission said it agreed with the firm’s legal opinion that the 2017 payments by the TH Properties board had violated Sections 230(2) and 230(4) of the Companies Act 2016, while the 2018 payments had breached Section 230(3) of the same Act.

“The commission examined documents and meeting minutes relating to the issue of bonus payments to members of the board and certain employees of TH Properties.

“The bonus payments given to members of the TH Properties board and certain employees in 2017 and 2018 were made on the grounds that development projects in Australia, particularly The Bay Pavilion, had made significant financial contributions to TH Properties in 2016 and 2017,” it said.

The report added that the project was claimed to have generated returns of A$11.6 million (about RM35 million) for TH Properties.

“The commission found that several selected individuals were given special bonuses amounting to RM1,148,400 in 2017 and RM1,045,000 in 2018.

“The commission therefore recommends that efforts be made to recover the bonuses that were given to those involved, as the said bonuses were granted without complying with the prescribed regulations,” the report read.

The commission found that the bonuses were approved for two directors, two former directors, and six officers.

Excessive bonuses

The commission’s review also found that bonuses given to Tabung Haji employees were extremely high from 2010 to 2017, ranging between two and 13 months, including annual and special bonuses.

“The commission’s examination found that the bonus payment process went through three levels of approval, namely the board, the religious affairs minister, and the Finance Ministry.

“Generally, the religious affairs minister and Finance Ministry would only receive bonus payment proposals as recommended by Tabung Haji management and the board.

“This included the proposal for an extraordinary bonus payment in 2014, at a rate of one to 11 months’ salary for the annual bonus and two months’ salary for the special bonus, with the overall amount potentially reaching 13 months’ salary, involving an allocation of RM74 million,” the report read.

It added that the Finance Ministry had explained to the RCI that bonus payments for Tabung Haji employees exceeding two months were subject to the minister’s consideration and discretion.

This took into account, among others, Tabung Haji’s financial performance, operational activities, financial obligations, investment performance compared with previous years, the productivity performance of its members, and the financial implications of paying bonuses.

It also considered the recommendations of the board and the religious affairs minister.

“The commission is of the view that, taking into account the financial issues faced by Tabung Haji from 2014 to 2017, where the value of assets was lower than liabilities as reported in the annual financial statements and acknowledged by the National Audit Department, this proves that the granting of high bonuses by Tabung Haji was inappropriate,” the report read.

It explained that the high bonuses were granted because Tabung Haji assessed its assets based on real asset value, which showed it had recorded substantial profits throughout those years.

However, the commission noted that from the beginning of the 2018 financial year to date, the granting of bonuses to employees has been controlled according to Tabung Haji’s financial capabilities. - Malaysiakini, 30/7/2026

 

 

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

ELECTIONS - Have the fraudulent MyKad issue been resolved yet? Crime of manufacturing false MyKad, and using forged MyKad to steal a Voter's Right To Vote


In Malaysia, during elections, there used to be cases of people using FORGED MyKads to vote - thus denying the right of the REAL Voter's vote to be counted. This is something that I observed when I was a PACA(Polling and Counting Agent of a candidate). Is this still happening today?

There are 2 major CRIMES here

1 - The CRIME of producing forged MyKAD - which ought to be a very serious CRIME;

2 - The crime of the person who use forged MyKads to VOTE - here is the crime of impersonation, and 'Vote Theft' 

However, to date I have not seen any Media Report stating the makers of forged MyKad being charged and tried in Court. Neither have we seen cases of people who use forged MyKad to steal another's VOTE. There is NO LIMITATION for Crime in Malaysia > thus, they still can be charged even if the crime occurred 50 plus years ago.

Maybe, the Election Commission or the Government should DISCLOSE how many cases we have had in the past General and State elections. Did the Election Commission even file POLICE REPORTS - for the EC knows whenever 2 persons turn up with the SAME name...

Follow the Charles Hector channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6UokfB4hdNugYmph1B 

Sometimes, the REAL VOTER does not even turn up - JUST the FAKE VOTER with a FORGED MyKad. The EC could check and see if the said voter was at the time hospitalized, or held in remand in some detention facility - or even still ALIVE or maybe overseas??? 

What the EC does when a 2nd person with same name/MyKad turns up to vote? 

The Election Commission practice in the past has been to simply issue a DIFFERENT COLOURED BALLOT PAPER to the 2nd person that turned up to vote with the same name and MyKad.

Then, when it comes to COUNTING of VOTES - the DIFFERENT COLOURED BALLOT PAPER is removed and not counted. Thus, the REAL Voter who came 2nd - will end up with his VOTE not being counted.

Yes, under the regulations of the Election Commission of Malaysia (SPR), a different-colored ballot paper is explicitly used when a second voter tries to vote under a name that has already been marked as voted. [1, 2, 3This special type of ballot is called a Tendered Ballot Paper (Kertas Undi Ditender).

The 1st person with the same name and MyKAD will have his/her vote being counted - although he/she may not be the REAL VOTER.

Once, I asked the EC officer as to WHY they did that? The answer was that they did not want to disrupt the election process, and GUESS what, the 2nd REAL voter will not even be aware that it happened - that someone else appeared earlier and STOLE his/her VOTE - and that his/her VOTE now in the 'different coloured ballot paper' will not be counted. {Voters do not know that their BALLOT PAPER is of a different colour - in short, one may say that the EC just DECEIVED the Legitimate Voter...

SADLY, many political parties are just concerned about the RESULTS - who WON and who lost? They are not concerned about 'Phantom Voters' and FORGED MyKads...

What the Polling/Counting Agents do - is submit all the 'wrongdoings' observed during an elections - and send all information to the Candidate/Party they were agents of > expecting that all the wrongdoings and 'crimes' will be reported by the said candidate/party > but sadly, if the Candidate WINS, the reports of the crimes as observed by these PACA agents is NOT EVEN reported to the EC or the POLICE - this is SO SAD > whether you win or lose, these hanky panky is a SERIOUS CRIME ...and thus, the candidate/party should at the very least make a REPORT of CRIMES to EC and the POLICE. PACAs or Election Agents worked hard to detect these CRIMES and Election Wrongdoings - with detailed notes of the name of the voter where 2 VOTERS turned up..

NON-REPORTING of these CRIMES and Election Offences is an INDICATION of the Integrity, Values and Principles of the Candidate and the PARTY. Should we continue supporting such parties - that is not bothered about such CRIMES?

As mentioned earlier, the Election Commission DEFINITELY KNOWS when 2 voters with the same name and the same MyKad came to VOTE > Did the EC make a report? 

NOT reporting a CRIME is also an offence > will some MP or Senator ask this important question as to how many cases of FORGED MyKad - where 2 persons with the same name turned up to vote??

MY VOTE has been 'STOLEN' because of this - Which political party made reports in the past - giving details of name used by the 2 voters?  

ISSUE of qualified voters DENIED right to VOTE > Only convicted prisoners serving a prison sentence are DISQUALIFIED as VOTERS - but those in detention not yet tried, convicted and sentenced are QUALIFIED Voters > and the Election Commission can so easily ensure that they can exercise their RIGHT to Vote... > so, why has the EC not being doing this?

Right of Prisoners/Remand Detainee To Vote In Elections - Postal Ballot, Early Voting....About 100,000 maybe...

Likewise, on voting day, QUALIFIED Voters may be in remand in police/MACC or other law enforcement lock-ups > these are merely SUSPECTS - not even accussed persons charged in court - they too should NOT be denied the right to VOTE...

What about those in Hospital or cannot travel because of some disability or just OLD age? Some are TOO POOR to use GRAB and sadly the State of PUBLIC TRANSPORT is bad in most towns in Malaysia - Pahang, etc... It was disappointing that Anwar's MADANI GOVERNMENT failed to restore Public Transport - at least BUSSES running around the District providing transportation > it could be under the LOCAL Government/Local Council that could operate busses passing through every 30 minutes or 1 hour. Public Transport is a GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY - because it must service ALL people - and even if the occupancy rate is small from certain kampung or rural areas... Malaysia must as a matter of POLICY and WISDOM enhance public transport - so less people will need to have to use their own cars,etc (How much is Anwar's MADANI government wasting in petrol subsidy for private cars > that MONIES should have just been used in getting PUBLIC BUSSES running in all towns...now, we still have BUS STOPS but no busses??? 

In Malaysia, today many QUALIFIED VOTERS work/study in places FAR AWAY from the Constituency they are registered to VOTE - thus, rather than forcing the voter to go back to VOTE (travel from JB to Kelantan, travel from Peninsular to Sabah/Sarawak) - is it not best for the EC to allow them to vote by POSTAL BALLOT or the EC can just allow early VOTING from the nearest TOWN ... COST of LIVING and TRAVEL is HIGH - people cannot afford to travel. Cost of petrol also HIGH, and worst, in Malaysia, we still do not have PAID Election Leave - which should be at least 2-3 days > to allow a person to travel from Sabah to Negeri Sembilan to vote, or from Penang back to Sarawak to VOTE. WHY IN 2026 IS IT STILL DIFFICULT FOR MALAYSIANS LIVING/WORKING/STUDYING far away from their Constituency to VOTE.

The Election Commission (EC) has ruled out allowing Sabahans living in Peninsular Malaysia to cast their ballots by postal vote in the upcoming state election, EC chairman Datuk Seri Ramlan Harun said. - Malay Mail, 16/10/2025

POSTAL VOTE or EARLY VOTE right for all Malaysians who live/work outside their Constituency? RIGHT TO VOTE respected - but also facilitated to make it real...

The maximum permissible spending for a candidate running for Parliament is RM200,000, and for an ADUN is RM100,000 > but still some parties allege that they spend MORE than that - Has the Election Commission acted on this violation of Election Law. [Remember, the reason for the LIMIT on spending is to ensure FAIR elections - so RICH candidate/party cannot use more > every candidate the same LIMIT - Honestly, I believe that this LIMIT should be LOWER]

FAIR ELECTIONS - make it easier for people to stand for ELECTIONS - are the current deposits TOO HIGH > can a B40 candidate afford these deposits... OR the ability to stand for elections is only for T20 and upper M40? 

The Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) found that during an election period in Malaysia, an established political party may spend as much as RM5 billion to support its candidates and campaigning cost. - Edge, 7/5/2026 > This will be a CLEAR violation of spending limit - for if you are contesting 222 Parliamentary seats, and the Spending Limit is RM200,000, then the maximum you would be able to LEGALLY spend for all 222 candidates is RM44,400,000 - so, if any party spend more than that > IT IS AN ELECTION CRIME. 

Maybe, the EC or the POLICE should investigate these parties that spend 'as much as RM5 billion' > Such parties clearly do not believe in FREE and FAIR elections, and the LAW that imposes spending limits to ensure it is a FAIR elections...

Under the current Election Offences Act 1954, spending limits apply to individual candidates rather than the parties they represent. The maximum allowable spending is capped at RM200,000 for parliamentary candidates, and RM100,000 for state assembly candidates. “The EC is reviewing the appropriateness of new candidate spending limits and the possibility of including party spending during elections to improve the Act,” said Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said in a written parliamentary reply on Wednesday. - Edge, 25/2/2026

Is Azalina WRONG - because now, there is Section 15A of the ELECTION OFFENCES ACT 1954 (REVISED 1969) which, in my opinion, makes the spending by political parties or anyone else with a view to promoting or procuring the election of a candidate  a CRIME - and that spending by political parties/others should reasonably be considered spending by the Candidate themselves.

Party printed posters and paraphenelia that is used during campaign period - that cost should be the candidates, and total should not exceed RM200,000. If the party provides financial assistance for voters to go and vote, it should also be considered logically expenditure of the candidate. If a third party organises a dinner event to promote the candidate - it should also be considered candidate's expense. If the government parties, arrange for an event at a government facility  

Section 15A  Prohibition of certain expenses during campaign period 

(1) No expenses shall, with a view to promoting or procuring the election of a candidate, be incurred during the campaign period, by any person other than the candidate, his election agent and persons authorized in writing by the election agent on account-

(a) of holding, convening or organising any open public meeting, open public rally, open public display or open public entertainment or giving open public address or lecture;

(b) of printing or issuing advertisements, circulars or publications; or

(c) of otherwise presenting to the electors the candidate or his views or the extent or nature of his backing, or disparaging another candidate:

Provided that this paragraph shall not-

(i) restrict publication in a newspaper or other periodical of any matter relating to the election;

(ii) apply to expenses incurred by any person in travelling or in living away from home, or to similar personal expenses.

Thus, political party expenses  with a view to promoting or procuring the election of a candidate is and ought to be included in the candidate's expenditure, which now is limited to RM100,000 for State Assembly seats, and RM200,000 for Parliamentary seat. Thus, if a political party had 15 candidates contesting in the Johor elections, the maximum expenditure must be RM15,000,000 - if more, then this, it can be assumed a breach of Election Law and a violation of a FAIR ELECTIONS principles. How much did Anwar spend when he went down to campaign - was he using his own monies or government monies? 

The Election LAW must be amended to include more than just the official 'campaign period' but to include from the date the seat became vacant until the election date. It should also cover pre-campaign period because MONIES are also spent before nomination date - with a view to promoting or procuring the election of a candidate or a party's candidate?  

EXPENDITURE LIMITS is to ensure a FAIR Election > to ensure that ensure that all candidates are given an EQUAL Chance > thus a LIMIT is set with regard to expenses.   

Newly-minted Election Commission chairman Azhar Azizan Harun today lamented the commission’s lack of powers to act against any candidate who violates election laws.Under the existing legislative framework, the EC, he said, could not investigate or penalise an individual or party should they breach laws stipulated under the Election Offences Act 1954. “The power to probe any allegations of any offence lies with other investigative bodies, such as the police, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC),” he said in a statement.- FMT News, 5/10/2018

EC Azhar Azizan Harun 'tiup wisel' NOW jika ada salahlaku PRK PD? Anwar ingkar undang-undang? Had belanja RM200,000?

Report Election Offences - Election Spending Limit for fairness between candidates, PACA observed wrongdoings not reported by candidates?

The LAW must also be amended to give the EC the power to investigate and prosecute persons who violate Election Laws of Malaysia. 

 

 

 

Felda lost nearly RM10bil due to mismanagement, political meddling, says Anwar - and the one to be blamed is the Prime Minister? Time to change PM?

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is responsible for FELDA - and now, after more than 3 years, this PM is suddenly telling us that  '...Felda is facing losses of nearly RM10 billion because of mismanagement and excessive political interference, says Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim...'. He should have TOLD Malaysians this 'fact' long time ago, a few months after he became Prime Minister. What else is this PM hiding from Malaysians? TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY?

Follow the Charles Hector channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6UokfB4hdNugYmph1B 
 

Who is to be blamed? Najib? Mahathir? Muhyiddin? Ismail Sabri?...or Anwar Ibrahim himself? WHY did Anwar hide this from Malaysians? 

WHO exactly is responsible for these LOSSES - again, PM Anwar Ibrahim fails to REVEAL this very important fact... and so, was the 'incompetent' removed from FELDA or still there in FELDA 'unpunished'? 

If there was a SCANDAL in FELDA - should there have not been a PARLIAMENTARY inquiry, or even a Royal Commission of Inquiry? We will be 'FOOLS' to simply believe Anwar Ibrahim, the person ultimately responsible for FELDA...

There was problems in FELDA - and who did Anwar choose to help Anwar - ZAHID HAMIDI? ODD, because Zahid was Najib's DPM? ODD because the Courts found a prima facie case of 'guilt' against Zahid, and the Court never had the chance to find him not guilty because the Court was robbed the opportunity when the Public Prosecutor chose to stop the trial? In another case, the prosecution appeal against Zahid's acquittal was also withdrawn - leaving us uncertain whether the the High Court that acquitted him was right or wrong? If Anwar had chosen some other, not connected to past political regimes, more so since he now blames 'political interference' as the cause of FELDA's losses, it would have been more reasonable. WHO 'politically interfered' -NAME them...

WORSE, Zahid's authority has been recently formally confirmed in January 2026? If Najib is responsible for the FELDA losses, can we honestly say that Zahid, who still believes Najib is a 'innocent man' be able to blame Najib if evidence shows that Najib is responsible for the FELDA Scandal? I doubt it noting UMNO/BN position on the guilt of Najib????? 

Umno president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi today confirmed that his role in overseeing the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) and Felda Global Ventures (FGV) has now been formalised following an official letter he received yesterday.He explained that he had previously assisted Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim with Felda matters in an informal capacity through meetings. 

“I have been tasked with representing the prime minister and assisting with Felda matters through various meetings. “However, following a recent official letter, this role has been formalised and expanded to cover both Felda and FGV. “This means that I am now officially responsible for Felda and FGV affairs in support of the prime minister,” he said in a press conference after his winding-up speech at Umno AGM 2025 here today. He then clarified that the responsibilities fall under the Prime Minister’s Department, not the Ministry of Rural and Regional Development. - Malay Mail, 17/1/2026

FELDA is not just about FELDA SETTLERS - some is about the settlers, but MOST is NOT. It is a Government entity - and, as such, it concerns all Malaysians... it is the peoples' monies ... 

Settler plantations account for approximately 56.2% of the primary agricultural land footprint, while FELDA’s corporate/own plantations make up the remaining 43.8%. Besides, this FELDA (nothing to do with the original/current settlers?) are involved in many other business ventures FGV Holdings Berhad (FGV), Felda Holdings Berhad (FHB), Felda Investment Corporation (FIC) and other entities.

PM Anwar Ibrahim and PH, after GE15, realised that it had little Malay support > and it looked like they wanted to get more Malay support - was that a reason why the FELDA Settler's debt was 'wiped out"....  FELDA - RM10 Billion Bailout? Clarification needed...'Bailing out FELDA or Settlers?' No explanation how DEBT occurred? 

Peneroka FELDA - malas silap sendiri atau silap UMNO-BN?Polisi Pembangkang?

ABOUT 15 years ago, tens of thousands of settlers signed a replanting agreement with Felda that activists claim has led to one of their biggest problems today – crushing debt. 

“Only in the Madani Budget in November 2023 did I(PM Anwar) start to set aside RM990 million as an early allocation to dispose of Felda’s settlers’ debts which total RM8.3 billion,” he said.. - Malay Mail, 8/7/2023

Earlier, Anwar allegedly stated that FELDA SETTLERS debt(Not FELDA's debts) of RM8.3 billion have been 'wiped out' - Now, he is again talking about FELDA's losses of RM10 billion? Same or different? Are we talking about RM18 Billion plus here? If other plantation companies are doing well, why is FELDA not? 

FELDA SETTLER's DEBT - Why did the government settle INDIVIDUALS debt? Was it because FELDA was to be blamed - by its actions of getting settlers' to enter bad 'agreements' leading to debt RATHER than encouraging Settlers to do themselves the work required to maintain their plantations? How could other smallholders do BETTER but FELDA Settlers with government advice/monitoring INCUR DEBTS rather than PROFITS?  

WHITE PAPER - this was HOW the Government EXPLAINS - during PM Anwar's premiership we have yet to see any WHITE PAPER on  KWAP, IMDB Recovery, the GISBH crackdown, the FAM-FIFA Scandal, ...A White Paper serves as the government's official account and justification

The Memali Incident White Paper (officially presented as Command Paper 21 Year 1986) was tabled in the Malaysian Parliament on February 25, 1986, by then-Deputy Prime Minister and Home Minister Tun Musa Hitam. It served as the government's official account and justification for the bloody siege on November 19, 1985, in Kampung Memali, Kedah. The clash resulted in 18 deaths: 14 civilians and 4 police officers. 

In fact, even in Parliament - a recent observation is that the Government do sometimes not even give CLEAR and direct answers to questions asked. In Parliament too, a recent Star report disclosed a NEW bad trend where the government fails to answer questions directly and clearly in PARLIAMENT..' The Star’s analysis of the first 2026 Dewan Rakyat meeting from Jan 19 to March 3 found that at least one in nine written replies – 157 out of 1,354 – were flagged by MPs as being generic, deflective or failing to directly address the questions asked.(Star, 15/6/2026)“Of late, this has become – you ask A, they answer B,”(Star, 15/6/2026)

White Paper on the Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA) was in fact tabled by PM Mahathir's first PH Government in 2019 - see what AI searched revealed... so this explains why the PM after, Muhyiddin was also responding ...and raises the question as to what did ANWAR do after becoming Prime Minister now about 3 Years and 9 months? He should have stated what he had done - who was at fault precisely, were they charged in Court ... OR...

Anwar Ibrahim maybe a good politician, public speaker, party leader > BUT is he or Can he be a GOOD Prime Minister? I think another maybe a better Prime Minister... and maybe Anwar should just be an 'adviser'...Following the outcome of Sabah and Johor elections, PH needs to do a SERIOUS REVIEW and even consider replacing the Prime Minister ...IF IT wants to survive as a CREDIBLE political party...One must be 'sensitive' to the signs of the times including public feedback expressed through election results >> if not, PH may suffer the wrath of the people... and may not survive...

One wonders WHY Anwar is raising this FELDA issue now, just before Negeri Sembilan State elections? Is it to lay blame on Zahid who Anwar picked to assist him with FELDA? NOW, this is 'FOOLISH' because the person responsible for FELDA is PM/Finance Minister Anwar Ibrahim himself...and the problems in FELDA has been known since 2019 - and thus, Anwar knew of the problems when he became Prime Minister in 2022 > THUS, what Anwar should be telling Malaysians NOW is WHAT has he done since becoming Prime Minister > has those responsible been prosecuted or removed? how has he dealt with this problem - if FELDA continued in the same state or incuring more debt ...THEN, Anwar Ibrahim personally has FAILED - Is it time for a NEW Prime Minister to deal with the problems? 

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is RESPONSIBLE for all government doings and failures including FELDA, KWAP, Khazanah, Petronas, all Ministries, Departments, Agencies and even GLCs ...and even Public Officers > he cannot simply 'shift blame or responsibility' to others...he is PRIME MINISTER, and he picked his Cabinet, and even 'chose' who heads various agencies/departments and government entities... Likewise, the responsibility falls on all MPs who decide who is Prime Minister and who remains Prime Minister...  
 

 

 

The White Paper on the Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA), titled "Ke Arah Kelestarian Lembaga Kemajuan Tanah Persekutuan (FELDA)", was tabled in the Malaysian Parliament on April 10, 2019, by then-Economic Affairs Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali. [1, 2]
The diagnostic document exposed multi-billion ringgit financial mismanagement and structural failures within FELDA between 2007 and 2017. It simultaneously mapped out a massive state-backed economic turnaround model. [1, 2, 3, 4]

🚨 Key Exposures & Financial Malpractice
The White Paper revealed that the statutory body, initially established by Tun Abdul Razak to eradicate rural poverty, was pushed to near-insolvency due to severe corporate governance failures: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • Squandered IPO Proceeds: In 2012, FELDA's commercial arm, FGV Holdings Berhad (formerly Felda Global Ventures), raised RM10.5 billion through a public listing. The White Paper exposed that FELDA spent RM6 billion of those proceeds on loss-making, non-strategic, and unproductive ventures rather than securing the long-term interests of settlers. [1, 2, 3]
  • Skyrocketing Institutional Debt: Due to poor investment choices by its subsidiary, Felda Investment Corporation (FIC), FELDA's total liabilities surged from RM1.2 billion in 2007 to RM14.4 billion by 2017. [1]
  • Settler Debt Evasion: The paper highlighted a breakdown in the plantation supply chain. Over 20,000 settlers bypassed internal management and "hijacked" their own crops—selling their harvest to private middlemen to avoid automatic debt deductions owed to FELDA. [1, 2]

🛠️ The RM6.23 Billion Turnaround Strategy
To rescue the institution and secure the livelihoods of over 112,000 settler families, the government announced a comprehensive rescue package: [1, 2, 3]
  • Government Financial Aid: An allocation of RM6.23 billion in government grants, loans, and financial guarantees was approved to restructure FELDA’s debt obligations and maintain living assistance loans for settlers.
  • Asset Divestment: Executing a strict exit strategy from non-core and underperforming assets globally to improve cash flow liquidity.
  • New Land Management Model: Introducing a land rental model backed by a RM1 billion allocation. This allowed FELDA to consolidate aging, fragmented smallholder plots and manage them via commercial economies of scale using smart farming and precision agriculture.
  • Settler Debt Restructuring: Overhauling the debt repayment collection system by rolling out modern pioneer cash-payment schemes to incentivize settlers to return their crop distribution to FGV factories. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

⚖️ Political Fallout & Legacy
The 2019 White Paper caused immediate political waves. Shortly before it was officially presented in Parliament, former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was referred to the Parliament's Rights and Privileges Committee for leaking the embargoed document on his personal Facebook page. [1]
The systemic transformations initiated by this White Paper laid the groundwork for structural reforms that subsequent administrations expanded upon—including the multi-billion ringgit settler debt waivers and ongoing modernization rollouts overseen by the Ministry of Economy. [1, 2, 3, 4]
 

Felda lost nearly RM10bil due to mismanagement, political meddling, says Anwar

The prime minister says the agency was brought down not by the settlers' work ethic, but by those entrusted to manage it.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said Felda was once the world’s largest plantation company, delivering good returns to settler families developing the land scheme.
PETALING JAYA:
Felda is facing losses of nearly RM10 billion because of mismanagement and excessive political interference, says Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.

Anwar said reports he received after returning to lead the government showed Felda was saddled with the debt, forcing the government to shoulder a heavy financial burden each year, Berita Harian reported.

“Eight years ago, there was a change in decisions. (There was) excessive political interference. In the end, the RM10 billion in profits has now turned into losses.

“I am now taking over and looking after Felda. Why? I received reports that Felda owes nearly RM10 billion. This is not politics, this is a fact,” he was quoted as saying during the Semarak Kenegaraan programme at Kem Syed Sirajuddin in Gemas, Negeri Sembilan, today.

Anwar said that under past leaders such as Raja Alias Raja Muhammad Ali and the late Taib Andak, Felda was managed efficiently, becoming the world’s largest plantation company and delivering good returns to settler families developing the land scheme.

He said the agency’s decline was not because of settlers failing to work hard, but because of those entrusted with managing it betraying that trust.

“Did the settlers not work hard? No. The problem was that those entrusted with responsibility betrayed that trust. This is the reality today,” he said.

Anwar also said the younger generation who would inherit the country had a responsibility to safeguard peace and prevent elements that stop society from progressing.

He said the country would remain peaceful and secure if the position of Malay leadership, the Malay royal institutions, and leadership in key national institutions continued to be upheld based on integrity and trust. - FMT, 27/7/2026