Wednesday, July 01, 2026

FIFA - How US discriminated IRAN and others, and FIFA FAILED to act? Remove Gianni Infantino as President of FIFA? Withdraw Trump's FIFA Peace Price? An unnusual off-side rule?

In this current WORLD CUP, there are several actions of the US at the last minute that are GROSSLY UNJUST to some of the participating teams, and it is MOST DISAPPOINTING that FIFA did nothing about it - Should Giovanni "Gianni" Vincenzo Infantino, the FIFA President be KICKED OUT? 

1. IRAN was a team that qualified, BUT Iran had to relocate its base camp to MEXICO despite having its games in the US - and then was only allowed to come to the US on the day of the match and return thereafter. This meant also that there was no time to 'acclimatize' to the venue that they had to play - and also no time to recover after the match. The 'fatigue' of travel also have to be considered - meaning the moment that IRAN got on the field to play any Opponent - they were already at a 'disadvantaged' position...

2. US also refused VISA for entry to the US to many support staff and officers of the Iran team > this would also significantly affect the IRAN team..

Multiple members of Iran's 2026 World Cup delegation—including federation officials and administrative staff—were denied entry into the United States. This occurred because the U.S. State Department cited national security restrictions, preventing individuals with alleged links to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from entering the country.The U.S. government issued visas for the Iranian players and necessary coaching staff but strictly mandated that the team stay in Tijuana, Mexico, only flying into the U.S. directly for their matches and returning the same day

3. In fact, others like even a FIFA referee selected  

Somali FIFA referee Omar Artan was denied entry into the United States at Miami International Airport on June 6, 2026. Despite holding a diplomatic passport and valid visa, he was barred from the country over U.S. Customs and Border Protection vetting concerns and "derogatory information" relating to suspected ties with terrorist organizations. Because of the travel ban and immigration policies, Artan was forced to return to Somalia and could not officiate at the 2026 FIFA World Cup

WHAT FIFA could have done when these issues arose?

A. FIFA could strongly condemned US actions - this is, after all, expected conduct of any country hosting the FIFA World CUP - Every participating country should be accorded EQUAL treatment - thus we have a football competition on a level playing ground. 

B. FIFA could have shifted all IRAN games to MEXICO or Canada for the first round - this could have been done in advance, so that all teams playing IRAN in the 1st round could have relocated to MEXICO or Canada too putting all teams in the same group in equal footing.

C. FIFA could also considered all subsequent games involving IRAN not to be played in US - this would have been better. Even the FINAL, if Iran was in it could have been done in Mexico or Canada. 

D. FIFA can now award IRAN a 'Special Award' for being the MOST DISCRIMINATED TEAM IN WORLD CUP 2026 - hence also sending a STRONG message of disapproval of US, and a 'warning of all future WORLD CUP Hosts' - no HOST should deny entry to any qualified team and support staff, or impose conditions on where they should stay, when they can enter and leave for games...Would the next FIFA HOST country also do the same to competing teams now that FIFA has been 'silent' about what US did?

E. US commenced an illegal war on VENEZUELA last year, and then with ISRAEL commenced an unjustifiable war on IRAN, which is clearly in violation of International Law, and also the UN Charter. Should FIFA had acted then, and acted strongly by removing US as a venue for the World Cup - allowing Mexico and Canada to remain as host then? By continuing as though 'nothing is wrong', did FIFA do wrong? Now, the US showed its 'true colours' in imposing restrictions on participating teams and also FIFA referees - will Fifa and its President continue on as though all is WELL... 

E. With regard to Somali FIFA referee Omar Artan, FIFA should have made a stronger stance - as this was a FIFA Referee and surely the names of all Fifa Referees and staff should have long ago been provided to US - this referee was allowed to travel to US, and then was prevented entry in US. If he was to be prevented entry to US, it could have been done long before. ANYWAY, Fifa should have asked him to go to MEXICO or CANADA, and re-assigned his tasks to referee games in these countries - NOT US. Why did not FIFA do so?   

IRAN may not have moved on to the Quarter Finals, Semi Finals or the FINALS - but what is MOST IMPORTANT is that no participating team in the World Cup should have been treated indiscriminately by the HOST country. 

An ODD offside rule - 1st time used against IRAN  - the "second-last defender," offside rule > so even if goal keeper is no longer the last defender, the last defender is considered, and so the off-side rule looks at the attacker in relation to the second last defender - First time I heard of this - see report below,...Why offside was called on Iran goal in controversial ending vs. Egypt to deny World Cup win

WHY should we remove Gianni Infantino as President of FIFA?

Infantino insisted he had no regrets over Fifa awarding hosting rights to the US, which will stage 78 of the tournament’s 104 matches, despite fans from four competing countries being hit with travel bans and the Somali referee Omar Artan being denied entry .. focus on football before addressing what he described as the three main issues: ticket prices, Iran and immigration to the United States...Artan’s exclusion led the UN to call for an American rethink on immigration earlier in the day, but Infantino defended the US’s right to control its borders despite having previously promised that this would be the most inclusive World Cup ever.

1st - because of how he handled this World Cup - IRAN, the Fifa Referree issue, and maybe others including Fans who were denied entry to US to watch the WORLD CUP..

2nd - Of the fact, that FIFA gave TRUMP a FIFA Peace award in December 2025 > and failed to withdraw it 

Donald Trump has been named the first winner of the newly created Fifa peace prize, claiming “the world is a safer place now” as he received the award at the draw for the 2026 World Cup in Washington DC. - https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/dec/05/fifa-peace-prize-trump-world-cup-infantino

3rd - How could he suddenly call up and ask The Palestinian Football Association’s president, Jibril Rajoub, to shake hands/hug the Israel FA’s vice-president, Basim Sheikh Suliman in April 2026 when the Zionist Israeli was still continuing to kill Palestinians - more than 70,000 now? And was it not all a 'publicity stunt' before he announced he was standing again for FIFA President? Was it to show that FIFA was apolitical - but then the recent failure to CONDEMN US treatment of Iran and some other competing statements - may show FIFA as being pro-US and maybe just too INDIFFERENT to the injustices happening in the world that affects players and also football fans? 

 

FIFA represents all footballing nations - and can FIFA IGNORE the injustices caused by TRUMP, and also within the recent World Cup - Should FIFA withdraw the FIFA Peace Award that it awarded to TRUMP - I think YES > it is within the power of those who gave an AWARD to also withdraw the award... 

REMEMBER Malaysia too that won against Vietnam also had the VICTORY withdrawn because Malaysia broke FIFA laws... Likewise in Malaysia, the King also revoked 

The “Tan Sri” title conferred on former Felda chairman Isa Samad, who is serving a jail sentence for corruption, has been revoked by Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim. - FMT, 11/6/2026

Malaysia (or FAM) should move FIFA to revoke Trump's FIFA Peace award.  

Gianni Infantino tells football fans to ‘chill’ in response to Fifa’s critics

  • Fifa president defends handling of tournament

  • ‘Screaming and shouting does not find a solution’

Gianni Infantino told football fans to “chill and relax” on the eve of the World Cup, while Fifa faced criticism from the United Nations over the immigration issues that have overshadowed the buildup to the tournament.

The Fifa president launched a staunch defence of his organisation’s handling of the tournament, particularly regarding ticket prices and visa problems, and claimed no one else would have been able to secure the participation of Iran, who are at war with one of the three host nations, the United States.

Infantino plays the hits as Fifa’s defender-in-chief on eve of World Cup

Infantino insisted he had no regrets over Fifa awarding hosting rights to the US, which will stage 78 of the tournament’s 104 matches, despite fans from four competing countries being hit with travel bans and the Somali referee Omar Artan being denied entry at Miami airport this week.

“We don’t live on the moon, we live on planet Earth,” Infantino said. “We have to respect that we are not kings of the world, who can rule over governments and police forces. We are a sports organisation that does as much as we can. It’s important sometimes to chill, relax. We work on everything. Sometimes screaming and shouting does not find a solution.”

Infantino began with a 35-minute monologue in which he urged the media to focus on football before addressing what he described as the three main issues: ticket prices, Iran and immigration to the United States.

The 56-year-old, who has been widely criticised for Fifa’s lack of transparency, then gave lengthy answers to the handful of questions that were permitted over a further 40 minutes before departing the stage with a wish that his audience enjoy the tournament.

Artan’s exclusion led the UN to call for an American rethink on immigration earlier in the day, but Infantino defended the US’s right to control its borders despite having previously promised that this would be the most inclusive World Cup ever.

“In 2035 we hope the Women’s World Cup will be in the United Kingdom,” he said. “Would you find it normal that Fifa would dictate to the British government who to let into the country?

“Unfortunately we live in an aggressive world and security goes above everything.

Gianni Infantino holds a press conference before the World Cup.
Gianni Infantino was talking to the media in Mexico City a day before the start of the World Cup. Photograph: Henry Romero/Reuters

“When I say chill I don’t mean sit and do nothing. I mean trust us that we are trying to find solutions. Sometimes we are successful, sometimes we are not.”

Infantino was equally robust in defence of Fifa’s ticket pricing, claiming that if they were cheaper the majority would have been resold on the black market, and that the money generated was required to fund football in poor countries all over the world.

“Until today we have sold over six million tickets,” he said. “The demand has been unprecedented, not by a little bit, but by a factor of 10 or more.

“The World Cup is a unique event that takes place every four years, and when you’re in one country you need to deal with local habits and local customs. Our entry price at $60 is the lowest of all the American sports in the playoff phases. Our average price of $500 is lower than the average price for American playoffs. You can at least compare the World Cup with the playoffs. When we put tickets on sale on the secondary market they are sold at a much higher price, which shows the original price was accurate.

“What’s most important in all of this is that every dollar we generate goes back into football. If we were selling our TV rights to pay-TV, like everyone else, we would generate four times as much revenue. And we could give all the tickets away, but they would still end up on the black market.

“As Fifa president we have to strike a balance. We invest in countries where no one else does – South Sudan, Bhutan. No one else is doing this.”

Infantino also claimed credit for the participation of Iran despite the fact that they have been forced to move their training camp to Mexico with many of their backroom team denied entry to the US, and ended with a personal note of thanks to Donald Trump.

“I went to see the Iran team in Turkey in March when people were saying it would be impossible for them to come,” he said. “I told them they would come and if I had to take a bus to Iran and drive them here, I would. They said they would drive the bus themselves. I don’t know who else in these circumstances would have made sure that Iran would come and play.

“I’m very proud of my team and grateful to the administrations of all three host countries. I have a great relationship with President Trump. Without his engagement it would have been impossible to organise a World Cup in the United States. He understood immediately the magnitude of the World Cup and he helped to assist.” - Guardian, 10/6/2026


Why offside was called on Iran goal in controversial ending vs. Egypt to deny World Cup win

Billy Heyen

Why offside was called on Iran goal in controversial ending vs. Egypt to deny World Cup win originally appeared on The Sporting News

There was still a defender behind the ball when Iran scored the goal that seemed like it would get them a FIFA World Cup win on Friday night.

Offside was called after a VAR review. The goal was disallowed. The match with Egypt ended in a 1-1 draw.

On screenshots of the play, it's confusing for most fans of the game.

There was clearly an Egypt defender deeper than the attacking player when the ball was hit in his direction. 

But that's not actually how the whole rule works.

Why was it offside on Iran?

The rule actually refers to the "second-last defender," because the goalkeeper is almost always behind the play.

On this play, though, Egypt's goalie had come out of his net, and he's no longer the last defender.

So the defender behind the ball more or less becomes like the goalie for the interpretation of this rule.

And because there wasn't a second player there, it's offside.

It's a brutal break. It's unlucky. There's nothing Iran could've really done differently here.

But sometimes, the depths of the rulebook work out in your favor, and sometimes they don't.

Here, Iran was the one so close to a glorious moment, one that was taken away by replay and a sneaky rule. - The Sporting News, 27/6/2026


Gianni Infantino’s attempt at Israel-Palestine handshake backfires

This article is more than 1 month old
  • Jibril Rajoub refuses handshake at Fifa congress

  • Infantino to seek third term as president

The Fifa president, Gianni Infantino, confirmed his intention to stand for re-election for a third full term next year after an attempt to orchestrate a handshake between the Palestinian and Israeli delegates at the governing body’s congress backfired.

The Palestinian Football Association’s president, Jibril Rajoub, refused to stand alongside the Israel FA’s vice-president, Basim Sheikh Suliman, in an awkward moment towards the end of the 76th Fifa congress after both men had been called to the stage in Vancouver by Infantino.

Several sources in the congress hall suggested that Infantino, who created the Fifa peace prize last year which he awarded to Donald Trump, had wanted to stage a photoshoot before announcing his candidacy.

Infantino shrugged off the palpable embarrassment of those present to announce the worst-kept secret in sport, that he will seek re-election next year. The election will take place at the Fifa congress in Rabat, Morocco, and he is unlikely to face any opposition.

Infantino was first elected as a reform candidate to replace the disgraced Sepp Blatter in 2016, but is likely to stay in post for 15 years after Fifa’s statutes were altered so that only full terms counted towards the three-term limit.

“I want to confirm I will be a candidate for the election for Fifa president next year,” Infantino said. “I wanted you to be the first to know. Thanks for your encouragement and support.”

Infantino has increasingly looked to portray himself as an international statesman in recent years, but the exchange between Rajoub and Suliman illustrated the limits of his diplomatic powers. After Rajoub declined to do his bidding, Infantino returned to the stage and said: “We will work together, President Rajoub, Vice-president Suliman. Let’s work together to give hope to the children. These are complex matters.” - Guardian. 30/4/2026

Iran hit out at ‘lies and mistreatment’ following US official’s joy at team’s exit

  • Iran responds to US homeland security secretary comments

  • ‘I was so happy when we said they could leave US soil’

Iran’s football federation has responded to a senior US official celebrating their exit from the World Cup by accusing the co-hosts of peddling “lies”, saying they are “used to mistreatment”.

On Monday, the US homeland security secretary, Markwayne Mullin said he performed a “happy dance” and “sung a song or two” after Iran failed to qualify for the last 32.

Mullin, speaking at a briefing at the government’s special event coordination centre in Washington, said: “I’m just glad they’re [Iran] done, and they’re not coming back.

“I was so happy when we were able to pull their visas and said they could leave the US soil, and I might’ve sung a song or two or maybe even danced a happy dance. I’m very happy they’re going back because there wasn’t a single team that we dealt with more than them.”

Iran’s head coach, Amir Ghalenoei, argued his team were the “most oppressed” at the tournament in his first press conference and, after their final Group G match in Seattle, Iran’s captain, Mehdi Taremi, intimated the US would rather Iran not advance to the knockout stage.

Homeland security secretary Markwayne Mullin at Capitol Hill this week
Homeland security secretary Markwayne Mullin at Capitol Hill this week Photograph: José Luis Magaña/AP

“We have to fight against everything here,” Taremi said after last Friday’s draw against Egypt. “I don’t know if people want it or not, but as we see it by our perspective, yeah, they are like that I think.”

Ghalenoei said on numerous occasions that the treatment of his staff and players was unfair. Eleven of Iran’s wider team, including the Football Federation Islamic Republic of Iran (FFIRI) president, Mehdi Taj, were denied visas by the US authorities.

They were also angry about their travel arrangements imposed by the US. On the eve of the tournament they were forced to move their training base, relocating from Arizona to Tijuana, Mexico.

Responding to Mullin’s comments, a spokesperson for the FFIRI said: “Iranians are used to the mistreatment and lies of US officials, so no one in Iran is surprised by these hostile remarks. These remarks once again demonstrate that US officials have no commitment to international law or the principles expected of a host nation capable of organising a global sporting event.

Iran coach Amir Ghalenoei and assistant coach Saeed Alhoei during the national anthems before the match against Egypt
Iran coach Amir Ghalenoei and assistant coach Saeed Alhoei during the national anthems before the match against Egypt Photograph: Daniel Cole/Reuters

“The fact that he openly celebrates Iran’s elimination says far more about him than it does about our team. It reflects a level of pettiness that cannot even tolerate the presence of a football team competing on the world’s biggest stage.

“After our match against New Zealand, our head coach said that the United States did not want Iran to remain in this tournament because of the inhumane and unprofessional treatment our team experienced. These latest comments only reinforce that belief.”

Iran left a handwritten note in Tijuana to thank locals for the warm hospitality and also make their feelings clear on the US. “You showed us that hosting a Fifa World Cup is about far more than stadiums and tickets,” it read. “True hosting is about respect, humanity, and dignity. We leave this World Cup with pride, but also with one fundamental question: Did every team truly compete under equal conditions and equal professional standards?” - Guardian, 30/6/2026

 

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

UN Report - Israel Targetting Palestinian Children - so how will Malaysia respond? INDIFFERENCE -because of worry of US retaliation?


The UNITED NATIONS has been shown to be a 'TOOTHLESS TIGER' - And the Primary reason is the existence of the VETO power which is held by the 5 Permanent States, including the USA. With the VETO power, the VETO can prevent the UN from acting even though the majority of UN member States wants to act definitely against violation of human rights and injustices. The use of the VETO can even prevent the UN Security Council from passing Resolutions against States that clearly violates INTERNATIONAL LAW and even the UN Charter itself.

France on Tuesday said 11 new African countries have backed its joint initiative with Mexico to limit the inappropriate use of vetoes at the UN Security Council...Foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot later wrote on X that “11 new African countries” had given their support during the Kenya summit, taking the total number of backers to 118...The resolution would be non-binding even if adopted by a two-thirds majority. Officials hope to make it more difficult for a permanent member of the council – Britain, China, France, Russia and the US – to use its veto in such cases.

# To remove the VETO, it needs a vote of 2/3 UN Member States, and the agreement of the 5 permanent member States that have the VETO - so literally impossible. Likewise the UN also cannot EXPEL the US or any of the permanent member with VETO power. So, is the ONLY solution the formation of a NEW United Nations with NO VETO POWER? 

Abolish VETO power to enable the United Nations to be able to be an effective defender of human rights (HR Day Statement of 19 Groups)

US clearly violated International Law and the UN Charter when it waged war on Venezuela and kidnapped the President of that UN member State;

The US and Israel clearly violated International Law and the UN Charter when it suddenly waged war on IRAN...

BUT, the UNITED NATIONS cannot act because any UN Resolution condemning US (and Israel) actions will not pass because US (and its allies) will use the VETO POWER to block it... 

MALAYSIANS had for a long time stood up against INJUSTICE and violations of human rights - Malaysia had a reputation, although being a small nation, is being BRAVE and standing up against the most powerful nations when it comes to issues of justice and human rights'

MALAYSIA's response had not been simply because of the ethnicity or religion of the victims or the perpetrators > it had been PRINCIPLED and based on the values/belief that we hold especially when it comes to INJUSTICES outside Malaysia - hence our strong stance against Zionist Israel, NOT all JEWS, for the human rights violations it committed against the Palestinian people(Muslims, Christians and Jews) 

Malaysia, like many countries, are now infected by FEAR especially of retaliation of big countries like the US, more so when Trump is President. NOW, the US has even fallen further down in its respect for Justice and Human Rights

# We are APPALLED by the US action that chose to attack a sovereign nation of Venezuella, and the 'kidnapping' and removal of its President by the US in violation of international law (Would Malaysians tolerate such an attack, and the taking of our Prime Minister or King by any other nation? I am sure Malaysians and all good people in the world will not > so, what should we do?). We will certainly not tolerate US or any other country that tries to STEAL our natural resources/sovereignty and try to get us how to deal with our Petroleum and wealth... 

# We will not tolerate  the ILLEGAL US-Israel illegal war against IRAN - where the perpetrators targets and kills off our leaders, and want to return IRAN to what it was 47 years ago when US and some other western nations again wanted our Petroleum and a 'share' in our natural resources. (Are we OK if the US insist that our petroleum profits are SHARED with US companies?)

# Likewise, we will NOT tolerate what US is doing - in making Cuba another Gaza > where needed resources for life is being cut off by US like petroleum, etc .. 

# Likewise, we will not tolerate the almost 80 years of what Israel has been doing to the people of Palestine - the genocide, the killing and the OCCUPATION and control of the land of Palestine. Even the formation of Israel by the then United Nations is a VIOLATION of the right of self determination (where the inhabitants DECIDE whether they want to divide its land based on religion/ethnicity or NOT - if the people said OK to Israel - Palestine division, it is OK > but they were neither asked or consulted >> the British Colonial Government and the United Nations decided. Now, Israel, after UN determined its borders - committed GENOCIDE > they 'forced' non-Jews out of their homes/land and still is continuing to do so. Israel has still NOT even retreated back to its borders as determined by UN - but it is still not just 'expanding its borders' BUT also sweeping the residents out...ISRAEL today may be MOST EVIL nation..and sadly the UNITED NATIONS or other nation states have failed to stop these GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION..

# UN may have become a 'toothless tiger" unable to ACT because of US's use of the VETO - but within UN there are still people that TRY - this report by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem,and Israel is one such example >> and their recent finding that ISRAEL had been deliberately targeting CHILDREN is such - possibly in line with their GENOCIDAL AGENDA - killing off children can END any ethnic group??? READ THE REPORT - How should MALAYSIA respond?

Let us also not forget the GENOCIDE in Myanmar - and the ongoing injustices being inflicted on the minorities in MYANMAR.. 

Time for us to ask WHAT SHOULD WE DO? Some government, out of FEAR, ends with lame responses of mere words - some do BETTER > Has Malaysia at the very least made a FORMAL PROTEST against such 'evil nations' - has it gone further in moving RESOLUTIONS at the UN (as it once did - see the draft RESOLUTION moved by Malaysia and other countries  


MALAYSIANS CANNOT IGNORE INJUSTICE AND RIGHTS VIOLATIONS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT DIRECTLY AFFECTED - ultimately it will affect us...

Now, under PM Anwar Ibrahim and the MADANI Government, things seems to have changed...

Malaysian stance have weakened - WHY? Is it because Anwar is 'closer' with Trump - and as such do not want to anger TRUMP or the US...??

See also:-  

PM Anwar - Is Malaysia supporting Zionist Israel kill Palestinians/Iranians/Lebanese? Clarify and RESPOND to Al-Jazeera REPORT

Malaysians stance of Israel-Palestine maybe different from Anwar and government? Blackrock, BOYCOTT, dealings with arm suppliers that kill Palestinians?

Anthony Loke, Transport Minister, explain 30 Boeing Purchase, inconsistent with PH position before, and against the Palestinian cause???

 

 

Note: The excerpt of the report is reproduced below; footnotes have been omitted from this post and are available in the original PDF report.

18 June 2026

“The essence of childhood has been destroyed”: Israel’s deliberate targeting of Palestinian children in the Occupied
Palestinian Territory since 7 October 2023

Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory,

including East Jerusalem,and Israel

Summary:

The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel examines violations and crimes against and affecting Palestinian children, including serious physical and psychological harm by the Israeli security forces since 7 October 2023 resulting in the death of at least 20,179 and injury of 44,143 children.

The paper describes the deliberate targeting and killing of Palestinian children, including post-ceasefire since the October 2025 Gaza peace plan. The Commission also examines a sharp increase in violence perpetrated by members of Israeli settlers against Palestinian children in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.

The Commission examines the use of torture, inhumane and degrading treatment, including sexual and gender-based violence, against Palestinian children, particularly during mass arrests and in detention. It analyses pattern of Israel’s targeting of critical infrastructure essential to children, such as healthcare facilities and its short- to long-term consequences, as well as the impact of reproductive violence on newborns, resulting in poor neonatal health and birthing outcomes; attacks on orphanages and schools, impacting the loss of care for orphans and unaccompanied children, and inducing academic harm and learning disruptions for children, respectively.

The Commission examines the impact of the conditions of life imposed by Israel in Gaza resulting in preventable mortality of children, exacerbating morbidity, and serious mental trauma from the relentless and widespread attacks by Israel over two years – collectively revealing severe, multi-layered harm to Palestinian children’s survival, health, and development. Further, the Commission examines how Israeli soldiers mock and weaponize symbols of childhood in Gaza, raising ethical, disciplinary and legal questions about the conduct of the Israeli security forces during the ground invasion of Gaza.

Lastly, the Commission provides recommendations to diverse stakeholders for the cessation of attacks, reparations, accountability and international enforcement of sanctions – aimed at advancing child-responsive justice.

I. Introduction

1. This Conference Room Paper (CRP) of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel (the Commission) examines Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, as well as their short- to long-term impact on children, between 7 October 2023 and 31 March 2026. The Commission has published four mandated reports and four conference room papers since 7 October 2023.

2. This report presents the Commission’s new and expanded findings on the intentional targeting, arrests and ill-treatment, sexual and gender-based violence, attacks on educational facilities and healthcare, and the conditions imposed in the Occupied Palestinian Territory which directly affect children. For the purpose of this report, a ‘child’ means “every human being below the age of 18 years”, consistent with article 1 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

3. Since 7 October 2023, the Commission has sent 13 requests for information and/or access to the Government of Israel, four requests for information to the State of Palestine and one request for information to the Ministry of Health in the Gaza Strip. The State of Palestine and the Ministry of Health in the Gaza Strip provided information to the Commission. No responses were received from the Government of Israel.

4. The Commission’s comprehensive findings on violations and abuses against Israeli children committed by the military wing of Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups on and since 7 October 2023 were presented in its reports to the Human Rights Council in June 2024 and to the General Assembly in October 2024, as well as in a separate conference room paper published in June 2024.

5. In these reports, the Commission found that Israeli children were subjected to physical and emotional mistreatment on 7 October 2023. In addition to the 40 children who were killed and hundreds injured, many children lost one or both parents. Many children witnessed the killings of their parents and siblings and were also filmed for propaganda purposes by Palestinian armed groups who published videos depicting Israeli children in vulnerable positions while they were under the control of the armed elements. The Commission finds it particularly egregious that children were targeted for abduction, several of them taken alone. The Commission concluded that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, including against Israeli children and child hostages.

II. Methodology

6. The report brings together the Commission’s findings on violations and crimes against and affecting Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory from 7 October 2023 until 31 March 2026, with a particular focus on the Gaza Strip (Gaza).

7. The Commission applied an integrated child rights analysis in preparing this report to examine holistically all aspects of Palestinian children’s lives and development, including the harm caused by Israeli attacks on their physical, emotional, social and cognitive well-being.

8. The Commission applied the same methodology and standard of proof previously adopted for all its investigations. Multiple sources of information were consulted; thousands of open-source items were collected and verified; and remote and in-person interviews and group discussions with victims and witnesses were conducted. The Commission attempted, to the extent possible, to incorporate children’s own perspectives through carrying out interviews and group discussions with them. The Commission’s interactions with children were conducted in alignment with the principles of ‘best interests of the child’ and ‘do no harm’ and the right of the child to participate and to be heard in matters affecting them. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the established protocols. Prior to engaging with a child, the Commission received informed consent from a parent, caregiver or other appropriate adult (such as a guardian or other adult associated with organizations with a duty of care towards the child), after which the Commission obtained verbal and informed consent and assent of the child (depending on the age), indicating their willingness to participate.

9. In conducting interviews for this report, the Commission recognised and attempted to minimize the risk of re-traumatising children and their families, especially when they had lost a child. Where it assessed that the risk of re-traumatization was high, the Commission did not contact the family directly but relied on information already collected by independent national and international organizations as well as open-source published photographs and videos assessed as ‘credible’ and used for the purposes of analysis and corroboration.

10. The Commission received information from healthcare workers, members of academia, journalists and lawyers who had been in contact with victims and their families. The Commission received evidence, such as medical reports including x-radiation (xrays), photographs, videos and audio statements of patients who had given consent to share this information with the Commission. The Commission consulted two independent forensic pathologists who provided forensic analysis of the evidence, including computed tomography (CT)-scans, medical reports, photographs and videos, of the children who were shot and either killed or maimed. Open-source material was forensically collected in accordance with international standards on the preservation of web-based content and rules of admissibility of digital evidence. Where needed, open-source material was verified through comprehensive cross-referencing with a broad, varied collection of reputable sources and complemented by advanced forensic examination, including visual media authentication, geolocation and chrono-location analysis, metadata extraction and face recognition. A full list of sources used for the present report is on file with the Commission.

11. The Commission has sought to include a broad range of topics and themes in the report and is aware that in addition there are other issues that fall within the scope of violations against children in armed conflict. This includes reports of the use of children by the parties to the conflict. These have not yet been investigated by the Commission.

III. Applicable legal framework

12. Under international law, the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, remains subject to belligerent occupation by Israel, to which international humanitarian law applies concurrently with international human rights law. The Commission finds that Gaza continues to be under Israeli occupation because of, inter alia, Israel’s control over the enclave’s airspace, territorial waters and land border crossings, as well as the re-establishment of an Israeli military presence and control on the ground in Gaza since October 2023. This has been affirmed by the International Court of Justice in July 2024. 8 Israel therefore is bound by the obligations incumbent upon an occupying power under international humanitarian law, as set forth in the Fourth Geneva Convention9 and customary international law, including the Regulations annexed to the 1907 Hague Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land (“1907 Hague Regulations”).

13. The Commission affirms that children are rights holders whose rights are enshrined in human rights instruments. Children are entitled to all the rights of human beings, as well as rights held by them alone as children, including under article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR),10 which entitles them to special care, assistance and social protection, and under the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). This heightened protection applies to all Palestinian children under the occupation of Israel, as an occupying power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. This special status of children is stipulated under international human rights law, international humanitarian law, international criminal law and customary international law, which together recognise that persons under 18 have distinct needs and vulnerabilities that require additional safeguards in situations of armed conflict, occupation and law enforcement.

14. Israel has signed and ratified the CRC and two of its optional protocols, and therefore is legally bound by their provisions.11 The CRC obliges Israel to respect and ensure all rights in the Convention to every child within its jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, including on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin, disability, gender, religion or other status, thereby covering Palestinian children across the occupied territory where Israel exercises effective control. The CRC requires Israel, inter alia, to ensure for Palestinian children: (i) enjoyment of all rights without discrimination; (ii) their best interests as a primary consideration in all decisions affecting them; (iii) protection of their right to life, survival and development; and (iv) respect for their right to be heard and to have their views taken into account in all matters affecting them. The CRC protects children from unlawful or arbitrary detention, allows lawful detention only as a last resort and for the shortest appropriate time, and requires humane treatment, access to assistance, family contact, and the ability to challenge detention for those who are detained. Other human rights treaties binding on Israel reinforce and deepen these special protections for Palestinian children.

15. During its review by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (UN Committee) in September 2024, Israel maintained its longstanding position that it does not have legal responsibility under the CRC for Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Gaza. The UN Committee, in its Concluding Observations adopted on 13 September 2024, again regretted this position of Israel, characterizing it as a repeated denial of Israel’s obligations towards Palestinian children. The Commission, aligning its position with that of the UN Committee, reaffirms that Israel, as a State party to the CRC, is obligated to ensure the protection of children’s rights beyond its sovereign territory where it exercises effective control, including Palestinian children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

16. Customary international law recognises that children in armed conflict are entitled to special protection, including priority access to relief, safeguards in evacuation and family reunification, and prohibits their recruitment or use in hostilities. Together with treaty law, it requires Israel to treat Palestinian children as a particularly protected group whose specific needs must guide all security, administrative and military decisions.

17. International humanitarian law applies in Gaza, which is considered to be under belligerent occupation. Based on the Fourth Geneva Convention, its Additional Protocol I16 and the 1907 Hague Regulations, the Commission notes that Palestinian children are “protected persons” and benefit from broad protections. Israel must avoid attacks expected to cause excessive incidental civilian harm, including to children, relative to anticipated legitimate military advantage. It must take all feasible precautions to minimise harm – such as choosing appropriate means/methods, suspending disproportionate attacks and issuing effective warnings where possible – and specially protect densely populated areas, schools, hospitals and facilities essential to children’s survival. The obligation to minimise harm includes the provision of medical care and evacuation to civilians, including children, injured as a result of military operations.

18. As an occupying power, Israel has extensive duties towards the protected civilian population, especially children: it must, to the fullest extent of the means available, ensure the provision of adequate food and medical supplies, maintain medical and hospital services, and facilitate the work of relief organisations to meet children’s needs. It is prohibited from imposing collective penalties or other measures that result in widespread deprivation among children.

19. Internment or administrative detention of protected civilians should be an exceptional measure of last resort, permissible only when the security of the detaining power makes it “absolutely necessary”.

20. Where children are deprived of liberty, lawfully or unlawfully, international humanitarian law requires that they be treated at all times with humanity and protected from all acts of violence, intimidation, insults and public curiosity. Children must be held in conditions that fully take account of their age and needs: they should be accommodated separately from unrelated adults (unless it is demonstrably in their best interests not to be), in facilities that safeguard their physical and mental health and provide adequate space, light, ventilation, sanitation and nutrition, as well as access to education, recreation and age-appropriate health care. Regular contact with their families must be facilitated as a matter of priority through visits, correspondence and other means of communication, recognising the centrality of family life to a child’s well-being. Prolonged or indefinite internment, internment without effective periodic review or based on secret evidence, or harsh and punitive regimes aimed at breaking children’s will or extracting information conflict in all circumstances with the combined requirements of international humanitarian law and international human rights law and other juvenile justice instruments.

21. Under international humanitarian law, the dead, including children, must be respected and their remains treated with dignity. Parties to the conflict must facilitate recovery, identification and, wherever possible, return their remains to families to enable burial in accordance with religious and cultural traditions and to permit relatives to mourn.

22. The Commission reiterates that Israel’s existing obligations under international humanitarian law and international human rights law are mutually reinforcing in providing protection for Palestinian children against all violations.

23. International criminal law, as codified in the Rome Statute and customary international law, defines genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes25 and recognises that these offences may be committed against children and produce childspecific harms. Crimes under the Rome Statute can have age-specific elements in their intent, commission or consequences, including when the conduct is directed at children as a distinct group or when children undergo particular forms of suffering.

24. Children enjoy special protection due to their inherent vulnerability and subordinate status, compounded by discrimination that heightens their risk of harm and impedes enjoyment of their human rights. It is also essential to recognise that abuse of power, central to such inequities and discrimination, exposes children to specific vulnerabilities, including sexual violence and exploitation, particularly in captivity or conflict settings.

25. The Commission recognises children as independent rights holders under international law and reiterates that crimes against and affecting children are a priority for the Commission’s investigative and accountability work, as stated in the Commission’s first report to the Human Rights Council in May 2022 (A/HRC/50/21, para.13). Furthermore, the Commission refers to its previous recommendation in September 2023 (A/78/198, para. 83) that the UN Secretary-General list Israel in the annexes of the next annual report [2024] on children and armed conflict, following which the Israeli security forces were listed in the annexes of the 2024 Secretary General’s Annual Report in connection with grave violations, particularly for killing and maiming of Palestinian children and attacks on schools and hospitals, signalling sustained concern about patterns of serious harm to children and reinforcing the need for independent and effective investigations to bring those responsible to justice where appropriate.

/…

VIII. Conclusions

352. As an occupying power, Israel is legally bound to ensure the protection, care and survival of Palestinian children. However, through the nature, scale and extent of Israel’s military operations in Gaza, the Israeli government and security forces have deliberately carried out acts inflicting death and severe bodily and mental harm on hundreds of thousands of Palestinian children, irreparably destroying the sanctity of childhood, including family ties, identity, innocence, safety and future. The Commission found that much of the harm suffered by Palestinian children was not incidental but intended to destroy the existence of the Palestinians in Gaza as a group. Since children embody the biological and social continuity of the group, the Commission has reasonable grounds to conclude that these acts form part of a deliberate strategy to destroy the future of the Palestinians in Gaza by targeting their children.

353. The protection, care, and survival of Palestinian children and pregnant women, are inextricably linked to the Palestinian people’s fundamental right to selfdetermination, as children represent the future bearers of their collective identity and resilience. By targeting children, Israel is eroding the foundational structure of Palestinian society, weakening the demographic vitality, and overall capacity of the Palestinian people to sustain and exercise its right to determine its future as a people.

354. Israel has targeted Palestinian children in Gaza in two distinct ways: directly by shooting at their vital organs using precision weapons such as quadcopters and snipers; and through use of high impact weapons causing widespread and systematic attacks on residential buildings, schools, and displacement camps crowded with children. Israel is also legally responsible for failing to protect Palestinian children from being targeted by Israeli soldiers and settlers in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and for allowing, enabling and encouraging ongoing settler violence, which serves to entrench settlements, annex Palestinian land and force Palestinians off their land.

355. The killings continued even after the October 2025 ceasefire. After October 2025, children continued being killed and injured in various circumstances, including when approaching the so-called ‘yellow line’, indicating Israel’s flagrant disregard of the terms of the ceasefire. The Commission maintains that a ceasefire that allows Israeli security forces to open fire on children crossing an ill-defined boundary cannot credibly be seen as a cessation of hostilities. The vague markings, absence of clear warnings, and lack of safe corridors have turned the area into a death trap, particularly for children. Egregiously, the ‘ceasefire’ has effectively solidified Israel’s continuous occupation of Gaza, marked by restricted civilian movement and attacks resulting in casualties, including children.

356. Based on its own investigations and documentation, the Commission has concluded on reasonable grounds that following divisions, brigades or units of the Israeli security forces may be responsible for the killing and injuring of Palestinian children in Gaza and the West Bank in the following incidents:

(a) Kfir Brigade for drone strikes and killing two brothers, aged 10 and nine, near Bani Suheila, east of Khan Younis in southern Gaza on 29 November 2025.

(b) 162nd Division, specifically the 401st Brigade and Shayetet 13, for throwing hand grenades inside a house with 30 family members, severely injuring a five-year-old boy, and later shooting and killing eight of his family members, including the boy’s seven-months pregnant mother and the father, in Sheikh Radwan between 20 and 21 December 2023.

(c) 401st Brigade, under the 162nd Division, for shooting and killing Hind Rajab and her extended family members, including Layan and other children in the car, and shelling the PRCS ambulance, killing two Palestinian humanitarian workers in Tel al-Hawa, Gaza City on 29 January 2024.

(d) 98th Division for shooting and killing a 15-year-old boy holding a white flag and his brother using sniper rifle in the west of Khan Younis on 24 January 2024.

(e) Multi-Dimensional Unit/Unit 888 or “Refaim” (Ghost) Unit, which operates quadcopters,468 for shooting and injuring a 10-day-old baby boy on 12 April 2024469 and a four-year-old girl on 24 August 2024.

(f) 99th Division for shooting and injuring an eight-year-old boy using sniper rifle in the Bureij refugee camp on 10 December 2024.

(g) Duvdevan Unit for shooting and injuring two girls (and an elderly woman) in Anza, south of Jenin on 25 September 2024.

(h) “Jordan Valley and the Valleys Brigade” also known as the 417th Territorial Brigade, for the killing of a 10-year-old boy, an eight-year-old boy along with their 23-year-old male cousin through a drone attack in Tammun Village on 8 January 2025.

(i) Menashe Brigade for shooting and killing a two-year-old girl in south Jenin on 25 January 2025.

(j) Ephraim Brigade for shooting and killing a 10-year-old boy in Tulkarem on 28 January 2025.

(k) Paratrooper Battalion, who were operating under the command of the Menashe brigade, also known as the 431st Territorial Brigade, for shooting and killing a 14-year-old boy in Al Faraa refugee camp on 16 November 2025.

357. Israeli attacks in Gaza have created a new generation of Palestinian children who will now face a lifetime of disability that will shape their sense of autonomy and agency over their own future. Children now suffer from a myriad of compounding injuries which have transformed them into long-term patients who will require repeated surgeries and rehabilitation (services largely unavailable in Gaza) as they grow, anchoring disability into every phase of their lives. As a result, disability among Palestinian children has ceased to be an individual medical condition and has now become a defining demographic reality – a cohort of Palestinians growing up without one or more limbs, with chronic pain, and visible and invisible scars.

358. Israel is responsible for causing a severe orphan crisis. The Israeli security forces have orphaned thousands of Palestinian children in Gaza. Compounding the situations of orphans, at least two orphanages in Gaza have been damaged through direct and indirect attacks. Israel has essentially turned these spaces of care into militarized zones throughout their military campaign in Gaza.

359. Palestinian children from Gaza and the West Bank, especially adolescent boys, have been arrested, tortured, and ill-treated in Israeli prisons and detention facilities. Removing them from their families and communities and punishing them based on their age and their identity as Palestinians – or presuming they pose threats for future acts they have not committed – raise critical issues of proportionality, necessity and reasonableness under international law. They were held with adults, routinely subjected to torture and physical violence, without any access to lawyers, parents, or information about their whereabouts. This has created prolonged uncertainty for their families, amounting to enforced family separation. Their detention may also amount to enforced disappearances.

360. The Commission has also documented incidents of sexual and gender-based violence targeting Palestinian children, often during arrests or in detention, causing severe physical and mental harm. Consistent with the Commission’s previous findings on sexual violence committed against Palestinians, Israeli security forces used sexual violence as a tactic of war to punish, instil fear, and treat the bodies of Palestinians, including children, as instruments of collective shaming and oppression, entrenched within a prolonged, ethnic, gendered, and intergenerational pattern of Israeli occupation and hostilities.

361. Israel’s deliberate attacks on hospitals, including those serving children and newborns, systematically dismantled children’s access to life sustaining care, undermining their survival as a protected group. These attacks, including the forced closure of paediatric hospitals, form part of a broader pattern of targeting infrastructure essential to children – including newborns’ health and survival. As Gaza’s healthcare system collapsed, injured children have undergone procedures in overstretched or damaged facilities, often without anaesthesia, sterile conditions, or postoperative care, leading to lifelong harm and increased mortality. Healthcare facilities caring for children were targeted and destroyed by Israeli security forces, with the foreseeable effect of depriving children, including newborns, of essential healthcare, causing long term physical and psychological harm and preventable deaths. One egregious outcome is that Gaza now has the highest concentration of child amputees in the world.

362. The Commission contends that Israel’s targeting and destruction of neonatal and maternity healthcare infrastructures in Gaza has had particularly severe impact on birth rates and infant health outcomes. These attacks have disrupted prenatal care, induced maternal trauma, and contributed to a systemic collapse of the neonatal healthcare system, leading to a rise in miscarriages, premature births, low birth weights, and neonatal mortality, as well as an array of congenital birth defects that has induced lifelong vulnerabilities among newborns. Over two years, the birth rate in Gaza has decreased, undermining the continuity of the Palestinian population. The harming of Gazans’ reproductive capacity and the denial of reproductive health care have inflicted grave, disproportionate, and long-term harms on pregnant women and newborns and future generations.

363. Israel’s use of starvation as a method of war, imposed through a blockade and siege, has produced acute and chronic malnutrition among children in Gaza, removing the basic conditions necessary for their survival. Children, including newborns, have been deprived of calories, proteins, and nutrients necessary for growth, with visible effects such as damaged hair, skin, teeth, and paralysed limbs. Immunological vulnerabilities have also contributed to the re-emergence of diseases like polio. Growing food insecurity, destruction of healthcare, and reduced immunization have severely undermined children’s health. Israel’s use of starvation as a method of war has also caused severe reproductive harms to women and girls, impacting all aspects of reproduction, including pregnancy, childbirth, post-partum recovery and lactation, as well as adversely impacted the health of newborns.

364. Israel’s attacks on schools in Gaza and the broader disruption of access to education due to the conflict have resulted in the complete removal of children’s education in the Gaza Strip. Repeated bombardment, displacement, and the collapse of basic services have severed years of schooling, weakening core skills like reading, mathematics, memory retention, and structured study. Children in Gaza have effectively been ‘left behind’ even if they have been able to receive some informal learning in makeshift classrooms or online classes. Disruption of education has also extended to the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, where Israeli security forces and settlers have closed schools, attacked students and schools, and interfered with schooling. The Commission highlights that the cognitive damage caused by disruption to education extends beyond lost years. It reconstructs Palestinian childhood around survival rather than learning, particularly in Gaza. By severing schooling, Israeli authorities have systematically disrupted children’s ability to learn, thereby sabotaging the intellectual and social foundations of Palestinian society itself.

365. Children in Gaza have been suffering from immense psychological harm as a direct result of the hostilities and the deteriorating conditions of life. They have been stripped of any sense of safety and future. In the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Israeli military operations, arrests and detention, checkpoints, raids, settler violence, and constant surveillance have terrorised children and created a pervasive sense of hopelessness among children. Israeli policies have produced a constant situation of diffused, ambient terror, that does not require constant bombing to remain effective. Mental harm has become intergenerational, producing a distinctive “occupied psyche” in which the freedom to play, imagine, hope, and develop an identity has been eroded. Israel’s occupation and control have functioned as long term mechanisms of domination, subjugation and oppression, thereby damaging memory, identity and hope across generations.

366. Israeli soldiers in Gaza filming themselves destroying and mocking children’s toys raise serious ethical, disciplinary, and legal concerns, symbolising the dehumanization of Palestinian childhood itself. The Commission considers that such acts were carried out in order to show Israel’s dominance and control of the population by reducing symbols of childhood into objects of debasement and ridicule and Israel’s subversion of an entire community through the desecration of shared possessions and spaces.

IX. Recommendations

A. To the Government of the State of Israel:

(a) Immediately halt military operations in Gaza, including in populated areas in Gaza and close to the so-called ‘yellow line’; strictly adhere to the principles of necessity, distinction and precaution in the use of force; end the use of high-impact weapons in residential areas, as well as quadcopters, drones and snipers; withdraw all the Israeli security forces to the 1967 boundary between Gaza and Israel;

(b) Immediately implement the orders for provisional measures of 26 January, 28 March and 24 May 2024 of the International Court of Justice in the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) and the advisory opinion of 19 July 2024 in respect of the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and end the unlawful occupation, including by ceasing all new settlement activity and evacuating all settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

(c) Immediately implement and comply with the recommendations made by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in September 2024;

(d) Ensure accountability for all those with responsibility for crimes against and affecting Palestinian children, both individual perpetrators and those in positions of political or military command responsibility (including, but not limited to, the specific Israeli military units identified by the Commission in this report – for example, see Section. (VIII). Conclusions, para. 356);

(e) End arbitrary and administrative detention of children and use of torture and ill-treatment; ensure that all children are treated in accordance with international laws and juvenile justice standards including the presumption of innocence and the obligation for humane treatment; guarantee that detention is used only as a last resort, for the shortest period, and that children are not held incommunicado;

(f) Ensure incidents involving children are adjudicated exclusively by specialized civilian courts – not military courts – with expertise in juvenile justice, in full compliance with international standards, and end labelling Palestinian children as “terrorists” or security threats;

(g) Immediately release accurate data of children detainees, including those detained from Gaza, and inform child detainees’ families regularly about their place of detention and their condition;

(h) Immediately return the bodies of all deceased children to their family members and end the practice of withholding bodies of children and other Palestinian victims;

(i) End the practice of targeting healthcare facilities, educational facilities and other facilities for children such as orphanages, and ensure the urgent reconstruction of damaged facilities;

(j) Guarantee safe medical evacuation for injured children and family members and guarantee their return;

(k) Facilitate the safe, unrestricted and immediate entry of humanitarian organisations and delivery of humanitarian assistance to children, including medical care, food, and water;

(l) Take all necessary measures to ensure the protection of Palestinians including children from settler violence, in accordance with the Fourth Geneva Convention and the CRC, including through the issuance and enforcement of clear orders to the Israeli security forcesto protect the Palestinian population, and immediately dismantle all outposts and ensure that they are not reestablished;

(m) Engage and hold structured dialogue with the Palestinian authorities to establish joint protection mechanisms for Palestinian children in Israelioccupied areas, ensuring that the security operations of Israeli and Palestinian authorities prioritize the physical safety, mental and physical wellbeing and basic rights of Palestinian children in line with international child protection and child rights laws and standards;

(n) Urgently develop an Action Plan in accordance with Israel’s listing by the UN Secretary-General in relation to children and armed conflict, under A/78/842- S/2024/384, in coordination with the UN, to end grave violations against Palestinian children;

(o) Incorporate IHL and IHRL, including the special obligations towards children under international law, into training, strategy and military operations of the Israeli security forces and Israeli prison services;

(p) Cooperate fully with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and other international mechanisms investigating international crimes committed in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

B. To all the Member States and those involved in ceasefire negotiations:

(a) Arrest any Israeli officials against whom arrest warrants have been issued by the ICC and extradite them into the custody of the ICC;

(b) Employ all means reasonably available to them to prevent the commission of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity and to ensure full compliance with the Geneva Conventions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

(c) Cease the transfer of arms and other equipment or items, including jet fuel, to the State of Israel or third States where there is reason to suspect their use in military trade or operations that have involved or could involve the commission of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity or other violations of the Geneva Conventions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

(d) Conduct investigations under domestic or universal jurisdiction of Israeli individuals or organisations suspected of having participated in unlawful acts of violence against Palestinian children, including Israeli suspects holding dual or multiple nationalities;

(e) Impose targeted sanctions, including prohibiting financial dealings and revoking or denying visas of individual Israeli ministers and officials and Israeli military personnel who may be responsible for inciting or committing violence relating to the abuse, killing or maiming of children;

(f) Impose targeted sanctions on extremist settlers, including a ban on financial transactions and travel, as well as on private entities, including charities, that support the settlement enterprise;

(g) Exhort Israel to end the siege of Gaza immediately, completely and permanently and allow unhindered humanitarian access to deliver aid and other support tailored to children’s needs in Gaza;

(h) Support political solutions and processes aimed at achieving lasting peace in Palestine, based on the right of Palestinians to self-determination and rooted in the principle of inclusivity and ownership, engaging and listening to Palestinians, including children;

(i) Support and facilitate access to justice for victims of crimes against children as a key component of any political solutions and process.

C. To the UN Security Council:

(a) Prohibit all two-way military-related trade with Israel and impose immediate, comprehensive sanctions, including travel bans, asset freezes and financial restrictions, on Israeli officials in positions of command responsibility, the leadership of the Israeli security forces and those in military command positions, and soldiers serving in Gaza on or since October 2023 who have or may have committed international crimes;

(b) Hold a dedicated debate on the situation of children in Palestine, taking stock of Israel’s compliance with ICJ’s Provisional Measures of January, March and May 2024, and authorize enforcement measures on Israel if it is found non-compliant.

D. To the UN General Assembly:

(a) Taking into account the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 19 July 2024, adopt a resolution calling on Member States to prohibit all two-way military-related trade with Israel and impose sanctions against Israel for its violations of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

(b) Hold a stock-taking session on Israel’s compliance with General Assembly resolution A/RES/ES-10/24 on implementation of the International Court of Justice advisory opinion of 19 July 2024 in respect of the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.

E. To the UN Secretary General:

(a) Expand the existing listing of the Israeli Security and Armed Forces in the annexes of the annual report on children and armed conflict to also include abduction of Palestinian children, in line with the findings of this report;

(b) List Israeli settlers, as an extension of the State of Israel, in the annexes of the next annual report on children and armed conflict as “persistent perpetrators”479 for child killing, maiming and sexual violence;

(c) Issue dedicated, standalone country specific reports on the situation of children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel;

(d) Prioritize monitoring and reporting of sexual violence against Palestinian children by Israeli security and armed forces, given the alarming increase in incidents and patterns of such grave abuses;

(e) Incorporate ‘denial of humanitarian assistance’ in the future UN Action Plan with Israel, given that the siege of Gaza by Israel has caused severe malnutrition and preventable deaths of children;

(f) Closely monitor and report Israel’s deliberate ‘denial of humanitarian assistance’ to Gaza which has had a profound, continued and life-threatening impact on children, noting that the humanitarian situation in Gaza meets all five primary categories of ‘denial of humanitarian assistance’ under the CAAC agenda.

F. To the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court:

(a) Within the continuing investigation in the Situation in the State of Palestine, give particular attention to crimes against and affecting children, taking into account the principles outlined in its Policy on Children;

(b) Examine the involvement of officials mentioned in this report and others involved in crimes against and affecting children for inclusion as those most responsible for international crimes committed in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

/…