Call 999, and the police turn up. A home break in and the house has been robbed. A neighbour with the key calls the police. Nobody enters the crime scene before the police arrives. Then the police tells the neighbor to ask the owner to check what was stolen and make a police report. Rightly, as soon as the police gets information of the crime, the police lodges a police report (First Information Report) which starts the Investigation. The Investigation Officer will proceed to the crime scene to start the investigations. Photographs are taken, and even the crime scene will be dusted for fingerprints... and this is material evidence to help identify the criminals.
BUT, here we find the police, eventhough they have information of the crime, and had seen the crime scene to confirm that a CRIME did indeed happen fails to make the POLICE REPORT that would have started the criminal investigations.
When it comes to police receiving information of crime, the POLICE must make an immediate report - that will start the investigation > Because the police did not report the crime, investigation did not start immediately - and the crime scene gets 'contaminated' and decreases the chance of identifying the perpetrator...and finding needed evidence to convict
WRONG for law enforcement to say that they will NOT investigate until they get a police report - The law imposes a duty on police/law enforcement to file a police report themselves as soon as they get information of a CRIME...
Section 107 Information of offences {Criminal Procedure Code}
(3) (a)
Notwithstanding subsection (1), information given by a person relating
to the commission of an offence to a police officer, who at the time of
receiving the information is not in a police station, shall be deemed to
be received at a police station;
(b) A police officer receiving such information under paragraph (a)
where practicable shall record or cause to be recorded the name and
address of the informant, the date and time of the receipt of such
information, and shall convey such information to an officer in charge
of a police station or any police officer whose duty is to receive such
information; and
(c)
Such information shall be reduced in writing and entered in a book in
accordance with subsections (1) and (2) and shall subsequently be signed
by the person who gave the information.
(4) A police officer shall be duty bound to receive any information in relation to any offence committed anywhere in Malaysia.
Another case, person makes police report about a neighbour shouting and threatening violence and even sexual abuse... After the report, it happens again, and victim calls the police station, and the officer allegedly told the victim - wait for the perpetrator to beat/strike you and only then, the police can take action. > What NONSENSE, in my opinion,? The police should have immediately acted on the threats - and should not wait to take action only after the victim has been beaten or there has been actual sexual abuse.
A person files a police report on LAND encroachment/trespass by people - Police takes NO Action - and after repeated calls to the police, the police tells the VICTIM to file a CASE in the Courts? Again, the crime has been reported, and investigation would reveal that the crime happened - then the police should arrest, investigate and CHARGE the perpetrator for the CRIME, and ensure that the encroachment/trespass ends - In Malaysia, SELF HELP is not encouraged - should the VICTIM get a Tractor and clear the area trespassed? Should he hire 'gangsters' to end the encroachment?
Recently another friend informed me, that a person had been DEFRAUDED by his/her business partner, who had taken monies of the common business > this again was a CRIME that police/law enforcement should have acted on. And again, after all police reports have been filed - the police tells the victim to FILE a case in the CIVIL COURT??? A crime has been committed, and the police/law enforcement must take criminal action against the perpetrator - Later, if the victim wants, he can go further civil action against the perpetrator if he/she wants to recover damages/compensation.
(By the way, being a lawyer, I am bound by solicitor-client privilege - so I cannot reveal names or more details about the cases above.)
THESE kinds of allegations of POLICE failure is rising - why is the police taking action for these crimes.
Do NOT tell me, it is a DISCRIMINATORY practice - if it was some Minister or even a 'Datuk' who reports, action is taken FAST - but if it is some ordinary citizen, ... then maybe... OR maybe it was just 'LAZINESS' - just avoid doing work of investigating, etc...
Malaysia has seen a 6.4% drop in index crime thanks to an increase in security operations nationwide.The
achievement reflects the effectiveness of coordinated efforts by
enforcement agencies, particularly the Royal Malaysia Police, in
ensuring public safety, Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd
Khalid Ismail- Star, 26/3/2026
VERY ODD - because in Temerloh, the number of house/shop break in and thefts seems to have INCREASED - So, what exactly is the CRIMES being considered in this CRIME INDEX. Some crimes, is dependent on law enforcement like DRUG Crimes, if poor law enforcement, they will detect LESSER crimes - some CRIMES cannot be hidden like MURDER, robberies and theft... But then, with regard to many CRIMES - has people completely LOST FAITH in the police so that many are not even interested in making Police REPORTS - sometimes, they now make police reports for some other reason - NOT expecting our police to promptly investigate, find and charge the perpetrator in courts. What are some of the OTHER reasons, people make police reports - INSURANCE claims, reported needed to apply for new Bank Credit/Debit Cards, and maybe some other documents.
So, looks like there is an INCREASED of crimes - and interestingly committed by LOCALS - Low Minimum Wage, Higher QUIT rents in Penang, Loss of jobs and difficult to find jobs ...INCREASED cost of LIVING... and LAST YEAR, our Malaysian STATISTIC department reported a 11.1 percent increase in the CRIME INDEX? Now, IGP tells us it dropped 6.4%??? WHO TO BELIEVE??
Malaysia’s Crime Index rose by 11.1 per cent in 2024, with a total of
58,255 cases reported compared to 52,444 cases in 2023, according to
the latest report released by the Department of Statistics Malaysia
(DOSM). - Business Today, 16/10/2025
HOW DO MALAYSIANS THINK ABOUT MALAYSIAN POLICE? WHEN YOU SEE A POLICE OFFICER APPROACHING, what goes through your mind even when you verily believe you did not commit any crime? Do you think how much will it 'cost me' - if not, what will be consequence even if we did no CRIME?
PM's timely warning NOT to obstruct or interfere with police and/or law enforcement - should equally apply to the PM and his members of government, even the royalty..
PM warns influential parties not to meddle in police work...Prime
Minister Anwar Ibrahim has issued a stern warning to influential
parties, urging them not to interfere in police operations, particularly
cases involving large-scale criminal syndicates.He highlighted
that past attempts by certain quarters to shield powerful individuals or
groups only hindered the enforcement of the law.“Do not obstruct
actions by the police and enforcement agencies. Sometimes those
offering protection are influential people. This makes police work more
difficult,” he was quoted as saying by 'I am
giving a very clear directive: if we are serious about taking action, we
are also advising everyone else not to obstruct it,” he added during
his speech at the 219th Police Day commemoration at the Police Training
Centre (Pulapol) in Kuala Lumpur today.
For information, the charges against Anwar Ibrahim then in 1998/1999 was as follows:
(English translation of the charges) from High Court Judgment [1999] 2 CLJ 215
First Charge
That
you, from 12 August 1997 until 18 August 1997 at the Official Residence
of the Deputy Prime Minister, No. 47, Damansara Road, in the Federal
Territory of Kuala Lumpur, while being a
Member of the administration, to wit, holding the post of Deputy Prime
Minister and Minister of Finance and in such capacity committed corrupt
practice in that you, directed Dato' Mohd Said bin Awang, Director of
the Special Branch and Amir bin Junus, Deputy Director II of the Special
Branch, Royal Malaysian Police, to obtain a written
statement from Azizan bin Abu Bakar addressed to YAB Prime Minister
denying his allegation of sodomy as contained in his "Pengakuan
Bersumpah" dated 5 August 1997, which they obtained as directed, in the
form of a written statement dated 18 August 1997, for your advantage, to
wit, to save yourself from embarrassment, and you have thereby
committed an offence punishable under section 2(1), Emergency (Essential
Powers) Ordinance No. 22/1970.
Second Charge
That
you, on 27 August 1997 at the Official Residence of the Deputy Prime
Minister, No. 47, Damansara Road, in the Federal Territory of Kuala
Lumpur, while being a Member of the
administration, to wit, holding the post of Deputy Prime Minister and
Minister of Finance and in such capacity committed corrupt practice in
that you, directed Dato' Mohd Said bin Awang, Director of the Special
Branch and Amir bin Junus, Deputy Director II of the Special Branch,
Royal Malaysian Police, to obtain a written statement from
Azizan bin Abu Bakar to deny the allegation of sodomy as contained in
his "Pengakuan Bersumpah" dated 5 August 1997, which they obtained as
directed, in the form of a Kenyataan Umum, for your advantage, to wit,
you used it for the purpose of protecting yourself from any criminal
action, and you have thereby committed an offence punishable under
section 2(1), Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance No. 22/1970.
Third Charge
That
you, from 12 August 1997 until 18 August 1997 at the Official Residence
of the Deputy Prime Minister, No. 47, Damansara Road, in the Federal
Territory of Kuala Lumpur, while being a
Member of the administration, to wit, holding the post of Deputy Prime
Minister and Minister of Finance and in such capacity committed corrupt
practice in that you, directed Dato' Mohd Said bin Awang, Director of
the Special Branch and Amir bin Junus, Deputy Director II of the Special
Branch, Royal Malaysian Police, to obtain a written
statement from Ummi Hafilda bt Ali addressed to YAB Prime Minister
denying the allegations of sexual misconduct and sodomy as contained in
her confidential report entitled "Perihal Salah Laku Timbalan Perdana
Menteri" dated 5 August 1997, which they obtained as directed, in the
form of a written statement dated 18 August 1997, for your advantage, to
wit, to save yourself from embarrassment, and you have thereby
committed an offence punishable under section 2(1), Emergency (Essential
Powers) Ordinance No. 22/1970.
Fourth Charge
That you, on 27 August 1997 at the Official Residence of the Deputy Prime Minister, No. 47, Damansara Road, in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, while
being a Member of the administration, to wit, holding the post of
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance and in such capacity
committed corrupt practice in that you, directed Dato' Mohd Said bin
Awang, Director of the SpecialBranch and Amir bin Junus, Deputy Director
II of the SpecialBranch, Royal Malaysian Police, to obtain written
statements fromUmmi Hafilda bt Ali denying the allegations of sexual
misconductand sodomy as contained in her confidential report
entitled"Perihal Salah Laku Timbalan Perdana Menteri" dated 5
August1997, which they obtained as directed, in the form of a Kenyataan
Umum dated 29 August 1997, for your advantage, to wit, you used it for
the purpose of protecting yourself from any criminalaction, and you have
thereby committed an offence punishable under section 2(1), Emergency
(Essential Powers) Ordinance No. 22/1970.
The Court, after trial, found him GUILTY and convicted him. Federal Court confirmed the Conviction. Some believe since the King Pardoned him, that conviction was overturned. NOT true, the King has no power to OVERTURN a Court conviction - only the Courts can.
Then, of late, we read in Bloomberg
On Thursday, Bloomberg cited three informed sources
as saying that Anwar had instructed Malaysian Anti-Corruption
Commission (MACC) chief, Azam Baki, not to investigate his former
political secretary Farhash Wafa Salvador over the controversial
purchase of shares in a company linked to the development of a new
billion-ringgit immigration system.
The report also claimed that Azam had told MACC officials that the
investigations into former leader Dr Mahathir Mohamad, his three sons
and former finance minister Daim Zainuddin were launched on Anwar's
instructions.
To date, it seems that these serious allegations, implicating the PM of wrongdoings, were never investigated - only that Malaysia investigated Bloomberg for possibly 'criminal defamation' and ended up with a NFA - meaning that Bloomberg was never even charged.
DANGER if Bloomberg was charged - because, in their defence Bloomberg may adduce evidence to show that their REPORT was true, or there was good reasons for Bloomberg saying this. The media would have covered the case - and the Malaysian public may form their own belief even if the Court convicted Bloomberg > that is the RISK when you sue someone for defamation or charge someone for criminal defamation. And, mind you, Anwar himself did NOT SUE Bloomberg for defamation either in Malaysia, or in US - and Anwar certainly could afford the cost.
HOPEFULLY, if a RCI is set up to look into Bloomberg that told us about the 'corporate mafia' - it will also look into the allegations of Anwar's attempt to 'obstruct' the proper working of what must be INDEPENDENT law enforcement agencies... I hope, ANWAR is repentant, and will never again do anything that will OBSTRUCT the workings of law enforcement in Malaysia after his 'abuse of power' and 'obstruction of law enforcement' conviction...Remember, Courts will ONLY convict if there is sufficient evidence to prove GUILT beyond REASONABLE DOUBT...
“Do not obstruct actions by the police and enforcement agencies.
Sometimes those offering protection are influential people. This makes
police work more difficult,” he was quoted as saying by Bernama. “I
am giving a very clear directive: if we are serious about taking
action, we are also advising everyone else not to obstruct it,” he (Prime
Minister Anwar Ibrahim) added...
The MOST URGENT MATTER now, after the 1MDB scandal/crimes is ensure that all Malaysian Law Enforcement Agencies, the Attorney General/Public Prosecutor are INDEPENDENT and professional, and NO Prime Minister or government can 'obstruct' or interfere...
MACC did not REVEAL the crimes of Najib then - and finally only investigated, charged and got Najib convicted after Najib was no longer Prime Minister... Was MACC not free to act - because of the PM or the government?
WHO picks the head of LAW ENFORCEMENT in Malaysia > it cannot remain the PM or a Minister-Cabinet member chosen by the PM - It must be an INDEPENDENT body...and with regard to reporting, these law enforcement bodies must directly report to the people - Parliament and the Cabinet...
See my Astro Awani interview in CONSIDER THIS - where I also highlighted the PM's power's in MACC, from the power to decide who the MACC Chief is, and.. https://international.astroawani.com/video/taxonomyterm124029/should-there-be-rci-macc-part-2
Malaysia’s Crime Rate Jumps 11.1% In 2024, Led By Property Related: DOSM
Malaysia’s Crime Index rose by 11.1 per cent in 2024, with a total of
58,255 cases reported compared to 52,444 cases in 2023, according to
the latest report released by the Department of Statistics Malaysia
(DOSM).
The increase was largely attributed to a rise in property-related
crimes, which climbed by 12.4 per cent to 47,188 cases, while assault
crimes also saw a moderate increase of 5.9 per cent to 11,067 cases.
Decline in Homicide and Kidnapping Cases
Despite the overall increase, homicide cases recorded a
significant drop. Intentional homicides fell 9.5 per cent to 237 cases,
while non-intentional homicides remained unchanged at two cases.
Kidnapping cases also declined slightly to 17 incidents, with children accounting for 11 of those cases.
Mixed Trends in Sexual and Robbery Offences
Sexual offences showed a divergent pattern. Total rape cases rose
by 12.1 per cent to 1,899 cases, driven by a 29.3 per cent increase in
rape without force, while rape with force declined by 15.3 per cent — a
shift that may reflect evolving reporting trends or patterns of
perpetration.
Meanwhile, robbery cases fell by 6.8 per cent, totalling 4,276
cases. Most involved robbery from the person (41.7%), followed by other
types (38.2%), robbery of establishments or institutions (13.5%), and
vehicle robberies (6.7%).
House break-in and theft also recorded a 1.8 per cent decline, with 77.6 per cent of these incidents occurring at night.
Drug Offences Continue to Climb
Drug-related offences continued their upward trend, rising 10.6 per cent to 81,090 cases in 2024.
Cases
involving drug supply increased 4.6 per cent, while drug possession
jumped 12.7 per cent, indicating intensified enforcement and possibly
higher rates of substance use.
Bribery and Misappropriation Cases on the Rise
Arrests for bribery-related offences rose sharply by 24.6 per cent, with 764 individuals apprehended.
Cases
involving giving bribes surged 51.2 per cent, while accepting bribes
rose 20.3 per cent, underscoring continued efforts by enforcement
agencies to combat corruption.
Similarly, misappropriation of controlled goods increased by 19.1 per cent to 2,243 cases.
The
most misappropriated items were diesel (30%), petrol (26.7%), cooking
oil (19.8%), sugar (10.1%), liquefied petroleum gas (9.1%), and wheat flour (4.4%).
Workplace Safety Offences Surge
Offences related to health and safety at work recorded the steepest rise — up 71.1 per cent to 296 cases.
The
manufacturing sector accounted for the majority of cases (57.4%),
followed by construction (27.4%) and business services (8.1%).
Animal Cruelty and Sea Robbery Remain Low
Animal-related offences dropped to 12 cases in 2024, comprising cruelty and welfare violations.
Sea robbery, once an occasional concern, was completely absent in 2024, compared to just one reported case in 2023.
Sharp Rise in Prison Population
Malaysia’s correctional statistics reflected a significant 28.4
per cent increase in convicted prisoners, totalling 128,916 individuals
in 2024.
Male prisoners represented 90.9 per cent of the total, while female prisoners accounted for 9.1 per cent. - Business Today, 16/10/2025
Malaysia sees 6.4% drop in index crime due to increased security
Thursday, 26/3/2026
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia has seen a 6.4% drop in index crime thanks to an increase in security operations nationwide.
The
achievement reflects the effectiveness of coordinated efforts by
enforcement agencies, particularly the Royal Malaysia Police, in
ensuring public safety, Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd
Khalid Ismail (pic) said.
“Despite
several incidents recorded during the review period from March 2025 to
March 2026, the overall security situation in the country remains good
and under control,” he said at the 219th Police Day celebration at
Pulapol Kuala Lumpur yesterday.
Index crimes are serious offences that are used to measure the annual crime index.
The IGP said the police are facing major challenges in
remaining relevant amid increasingly complex and evolving security
threats.
He said the force must continue to adapt and meet the
expectations of both the government and the public without compromising
its core responsibility to uphold the law.
“However, pressures and
public perception will not undermine the police’s firmness in upholding
justice based on the rule of law,” he said.
He also recalled several attacks on police personnel, including
the 2017 shooting at the Pinggiran Subang police station and the 2024
attack at the Ulu Tiram police station in Johor, which left two officers
dead and another seriously injured.
“We need improvements to
infrastructure at critical premises, as well as amendments to existing
laws, to ensure they remain progressive and relevant in addressing the
complexity of current security threats,” he added.
Meanwhile, the
IGP expressed appreciation for the government’s continued support,
including a total allocation of RM12.063bil for 2026.
He said the
government has also approved RM200mil to expand information and
communications technology (ICT) facilities at police stations and
quarters nationwide.
“This shows the government’s commitment is
not merely rhetoric but translated into tangible action in strengthening
national security,” he said.- - Star, 26/3/2026
PM warns influential parties not to meddle in police work, praises cops for courage
Published: Mar 25, 2026 5:24 PM
⋅
Updated: 4:24 P
Prime
Minister Anwar Ibrahim has issued a stern warning to influential
parties, urging them not to interfere in police operations, particularly
cases involving large-scale criminal syndicates.
He highlighted
that past attempts by certain quarters to shield powerful individuals or
groups only hindered the enforcement of the law.
“Do not obstruct
actions by the police and enforcement agencies. Sometimes those
offering protection are influential people. This makes police work more
difficult,” he was quoted as saying by Bernama.
“I am
giving a very clear directive: if we are serious about taking action, we
are also advising everyone else not to obstruct it,” he added during
his speech at the 219th Police Day commemoration at the Police Training
Centre (Pulapol) in Kuala Lumpur today.
Anwar
also praised the courage of the police department, noting their
increasingly assertive approach in dismantling major illegal syndicates
and against corrupt figures who had long seemed “immune” to the law.
“I
am grateful because I see firmness and courage in taking action, not
only against minor corruptors but also against major ones who have
operated for decades yet were never dared to be touched.
“These
large illegal syndicates have long been embedded in our system, and I
congratulate (the police) for successfully breaking them through
professionalism, determination, and courage,” he said.
Under the
Madani framework, the prime minister stressed, the government is
committed to ensuring the law is no longer drafted or enforced to favour
certain powerful and wealthy groups.
He said the public now
recognises the dedication and sacrifices of the police, which has helped
Malaysia maintain its status as one of the safest countries in the
world, despite facing a range of domestic and global security
challenges.
Highest appreciation for the police
Anwar
urged police personnel to continue strengthening professionalism and
integrity, which he described as essential pillars for driving national
transformation.
“The peace achieved through the sacrifices of
security forces is a fundamental foundation that allows the government
to focus on economic reforms, information technology agendas, and
digital transformation.
“Our duty is to honour past service and set a new guideline for enhancing the professionalism and integrity of the police force.
“In
any renewal or reform, the agenda begins with the prerequisite of
peace. As citizens, we must express our highest appreciation for the
service, sacrifice, and loyalty of the police, which has enabled
Malaysia to be recognised as one of the safest countries in the world,”
he added.
Also present at the event were Deputy Prime Minister
Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, Deputy Home
Minister Shamsul Anuar Nasarah, and Communications Minister Fahmi
Fadzil.
Other dignitaries included Chief Secretary to the
Government Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar, Inspector-General of Police Khalid
Ismail and his deputy Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay, along with directors of
the police. - Malaysiakini, 25/3/2026
Posts
