Tuesday, June 09, 2026

Criminalize TORTURE, enforced dissaperance, extra-judicial killing by law enforcement in LAW - 1st INDICATOR of Government's position, if not does MADANI and Government think it is OK? Charge in Court and NO to simply disciplinary actions or 'forgiveness by PM'???

Anwar Ibrahim's MADANI Government is yet to CRIMINALIZE Torture committed by law enforcement > this means that this Government(and previous government) still does not think that TORTURE, beatings, sexual torture, etc is A CRIME - IT must be a more serious CRIME especially when committed by Public Officers, Police, Prison Officers, MACC Officers, Immigration Officers - all Government Officers under the Prime Minister and/or Government. First STEP - criminalize it making it clear that the Malaysian Government takes the position that it is a WRONG - a serious CRIME.

Enforced Disappearance is a also a SERIOUS CRIME, more so it is a CRIME committed by government/State officers either by the officers themselves, or with the support of government officers..(this was recommended by SUHAKAM in the 2 Public Inquiries on Enforced Disappearance) - does Anwar think it is NOT a SERIOUS Crime? SHAMEFUL...

SO too is EXTRAJUDICIAL Killing... 

Enact law criminalising enforced disappearance, says PH's former deputy de facto law minister.

Thus, for cases of assault, Malaysia is still using the laws applied to anyone who cause hurt(s. 323 Penal Code) and grievous hurt(s.325) but there must be a MORE serious crime with higher deterrent sentence when the perpetrator is a public officer or law enforcement officer, and the crime was committed during the 'alleged' carrying out of public duty... We look at the Court of Appeal judgment of then IGP who TORTURED and caused Anwar to suffer a black eye...

 


We would, however, like to take this opportunity to remind the lower courts that they should take cases of police officers assaulting anyone very seriously. When a police officer, be he of whatever rank, is found guilty of assaulting a member of the public and more so of an arrested person as in this case, the courts should send a message of the public abhorrence of such acts - by coming down hard on and nothing short of a custodial sentence, even for a first offender, would suffice. Shaik Daud Ismail JCA,  TAN SRI ABDUL RAHIM MOHD NOOR v. PP,  COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR [2001] 4 CLJ 9  

FIRST CRIMINALIZE such offences in Malaysian LAW. Later we may look at the other problems in the administration of criminal justice - 'selective non-investigation', NFA(No Further Action) decisions, selective non-prosecution > the non-charging in CRIMINAL courts, and the 'poor' prosecution that results in NO conviction...??? To prevent 'difficulty in securing evidence', we have asked for CCTV everywhere in government law enforcement premises, detention places and also PRISONS, the use of 'BODY-CAM' for all officers whilst the work, when they arrest > all to ensure that the LAW is followed, and VICTIM rights are protected >> It has started in Malaysia > but still a long way to go...WHY? NOT PRIORITY? 


 

A total of 42 deaths in custody were recorded in 2025, says Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. He said the figure comprised eight cases in prison and 34 under police care including 22 deaths while under police detention and 12 in police lock-ups. - Star, 5/2/2026

The 40-year-old tow-truck operator lodged a police report on Tuesday, claiming that he was beaten multiple times during interrogation. According to Malaysiakini, he alleged that at least two officers beat him on the head with their footwear, while another twisted a pencil between his toes, causing severe pain. “My hands were handcuffed behind my back and were stepped on by several officers until I screamed in pain,” the man alleged in a police report. “At the same time, another police officer stepped on both my legs, leaving marks that are still visible. I was also slapped once by an unidentified person and electrocuted on my right ear by an officer I couldn’t identify because my eyes were covered.” The man claimed the alleged abuse was intended to force a confession from him. According to his report, the officers involved included a Malay and a non-Malay individual. - Malay Mail, 19/3/2026

ONE biggest problem in Malaysia, even during PM Anwar Ibrahim's PH-led Coalition MADANI government is the perceived 'attitude' to PROTECT government law enforcement and/or government agencies and government linked entities, and their Directors and officers - by a policy of selective non-investigation and non-prosecution policy - That is a PUBLIC PERCEPTION > how many public officers to date have successfully charged, tried and convicted for TORTURE and even killing of persons in police or law-enforcement custody? Most of these crimes occur within government establishment, and often in the presence of other public officers/police/MACC/prison officers...

What Malaysia MUST do is to actually CRIMINALISE Torture, providing for a more serious and deterent offence when the alleged perpetrators are PUBLIC OFFICERS and the said TORTURE happened when they were on duty - arrest, detention, investigation, etc...

This is ALSO a demand of the Coalition Against Torture and Death in Custody Malaysia (Gabungan Anti-Penyeksaan dan Kematian dalam Tahanan Malaysia – GAPKTM) when it presented a Memo to the IGP, etc 

....calling for the establishment of a permanent independent mechanism between enforcement agencies and prosecutors to prevent custodial death cases from being delayed, neglected, or compromised. An Anti-Torture Act should be enacted to eliminate all forms of torture and death in custody at state institutions.

The CRIMINALIZING of TORTURE is simple - an indication that the Government and MALAYSIA no longer tolerate TORTURE, and perpetrators will be charged, tried and severely punished, if CONVICTED if the criminals are public officers..., then a DETERRENT SENTENCE??? 

This call also is NOW most relevant for the 100 plus detainees that SUHAKAM found recently were tortured, where there was also 1 DEATH IN CUSTODY

When Doctor's LIE in letters/documents, should they be DISALLOWED to Practice as Doctors in Malaysia? Should he be also charged for MURDER, obstruction of justice, false documents?


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 8 JUNE 2026

*FOUR FAMILIES DEMAND JUSTICE: COALITION URGES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND IGP TO END IMPUNITY IN CUSTODIAL DEATH CASES*

PUTRAJAYA – The Coalition Against Torture and Death in Custody Malaysia (Gabungan Anti-Penyeksaan dan Kematian dalam Tahanan Malaysia – GAPKTM), together with family members of four victims who died while under the custody or care of state institutions, today submitted a memorandum to the Attorney General and the Inspector General of Police demanding immediate action to secure justice after years of delays, and lack of accountability.

The memorandum highlights four cases involving:

Syed Mohd Azlan Syed Mohamed Nur, who died in police custody in Johor in 2014 after suffering 61 documented injuries.

J. Soosaimanicckam, a Royal Malaysian Navy cadet whose death was ruled a homicide by the High Court in 2024.

Rafi Ullah, a Pakistani refugee who died in Sungai Buloh Prison in 2021 amid allegations of torture and whose promised inquest has yet to commence.

Mohd Zaidi Abdul Hamid, a prisoner who died in 2024 following complications linked to caning injuries and alleged failures in medical treatment.

The four families have waited years for answers, accountability, and justice. Despite court findings, official inquiries, recommendations from EAIC, SUHAKAM and other oversight bodies, critical investigations and legal proceedings remain stalled.

DEMANDS OF THE FAMILIES

1. Justice for Syed Mohd Azlan

The family demands that the Attorney General reopen criminal investigations into evidence destruction and cover-up activities identified by the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC), and pursue accountability against all officers involved in the incident.

2. Justice for J. Soosaimanicckam

The family demands that the Royal Malaysia Police complete its homicide investigation without further delay and submit investigation papers for prosecution recommendations against those responsible.

3. Justice for Rafi Ullah

The family demands that the Attorney General immediately direct the commencement of a judicial inquest, as previously promised, to establish the circumstances surrounding his death and allegations of torture.

4. Justice for Mohd Zaidi Abdul Hamid

The family demands an immediate judicial inquest into the circumstances of his death, including the role of caning injuries, adequacy of medical care, and any possible negligence by authorities.

CALL FOR SYSTEMIC REFORM

Beyond the individual cases, GAPKTM is calling for the establishment of a permanent independent mechanism between enforcement agencies and prosecutors to prevent custodial death cases from being delayed, neglected, or compromised. An Anti-Torture Act should be enacted to eliminate all forms of torture and death in custody at state institutions.

The coalition stresses that deaths in custody engage the State's constitutional responsibility to protect life and ensure equal protection under the law. Families of victims must not be left waiting indefinitely while investigations stagnate.

Speaking at a press conference at the Attorney General’s office in Putrajaya, GAPKTM’s coordinator Syed Shariff Syed Mohamed Nur said :

"Today, four families stand before the Attorney General's Chambers carrying years of grief. They are not asking for special treatment. They are asking for the most basic accountability and upholding the rule of law: that when a person dies in the custody of or at the hand of the State, the truth will be uncovered and those responsible will be held accountable."

ABOUT US

The Coalition Against Torture and Death in Custody Malaysia (Gabungan Anti-Penyeksaan dan Kematian dalam Tahanan Malaysia – GAPKTM) is a victim family support group that advocates for elimination of torture, custodial violence and deaths, while promoting accountability, transparency and justice in Malaysia.

The coalition is endorsed by Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Association (TBH-ADA), Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET), Eliminating Deaths and Abuse in Custody Together (EDICT), Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) and HAYAT. TBH-ADA is the secretariat of the coalition.

See also some earlier relevant posts 

SUHAKAM Demands Justice, Transparency and Government Action on Enforced Disappearances

Rights group calls for laws to criminalise enforced disappearance (Malaysiakini) & FMT report

Media Statement – 30/8/2024 (International Day of the Victims of Enforced Disappearances)

SUHAKAM and Parliament Must Investigate Whether Extrajudicial Killings Are ‘Planned’ Murders with no intention of arrest - Improve public perception of law enforcement(Media statement and Sccop report)

Police Officer's Right To Defy Orders to Kill or Torture - Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions. 298 shot dead between 2007 and August 2012.

When police shoot and kill - Minister must apologize and Charge the police killers in court - Let Court decide on guilt or defence. Criminalize extrajudicial killing(with deterent sentence) - A Statement of 18 Groups - Criminalize extrajudicial killing, and charge law enforcement officers involved in the killing in Court, for it is Court that decides guilt and whether any defence including self defence will succeed

Charge the police officers in COURT - no to 'internal disciplinary' procedures or termination for enforced dissapearance cases

Police officers that tortured and killed detainee - what will the AG and the Malaysian government do?

Cepat tindakan kes bunuh lelaki korea, kenapa lambat tuduh polis/pembunuh Syed Mohd Azlan?

Police officers that killed Syed Mohd Azlan, and tried to hide a crime? What happened?

EAIC’S INVESTIGATION FINDINGS ON THE DEATH OF N. DHARMENDRAN IN POLICE CUSTODY

15 Immigration Officers 'Sacked' - not right, just charge them in court? To ensure no 'cover ups'? Deterrence too? Justice demands it..


Families of late cadet, inmates go to AGC seeking justice

NGO says investigations and legal proceedings have been delayed despite court findings and recommendations from oversight bodies.

The group submitting the memorandum to a representative of the AGC at its headquarters in Putrajaya.
PETALING JAYA:
Family members of a cadet and three inmates who died in custody have submitted a memorandum to the Attorney-General’s Chambers and the police seeking justice for their loved ones.

Supported by the Coalition Against Torture and Death in Custody Malaysia, their memorandum was submitted to the AGC’s headquarters in Putrajaya this morning, addressed to both the inspector-general of police and the attorney-general.

The group demanded that the police promptly complete their murder investigation into the death of naval cadet officer J Soosaimanicckam and submit the probe paper to prosecutors.

They also urged the attorney-general to reopen investigations into alleged cover-ups in the custodial death of Syed Azlan Syed Nur, and for an inquest to be held into the death of refugee Rafi Ullah, a Pakistani inmate who was allegedly tortured before dying in Sungai Buloh prison in 2021.

The families also called for an inquest into the 2024 death of Pokok Sena prison inmate Zaidi Abdul Hamid, after he allegedly developed severe infected wounds following 12 strokes of the cane.

“The four families have waited years for answers, accountability and justice,” the coalition’s coordinator, Syed Shariff Syed Nur, said in a statement.

“Despite the court findings, official inquiries, and recommendations from the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission, Suhakam and other oversight bodies, critical investigations and legal proceedings remain stalled.

“They are not asking for special treatment. They are asking for the most basic level of accountability and for the rule of law to be upheld.”

The group also urged Putrajaya to establish an independent inter-agency mechanism to ensure custodial death cases are thoroughly and immediately investigated.

“It is the state’s constitutional responsibility to protect life and ensure equal protection under the law. Families of victims must not be left waiting indefinitely while investigations stagnate,” the memorandum said. - FMT, 8/6/2026

Former IGP sentenced to two months' jail
R. Mageswari
Published:  Apr 18, 2001 4:16 AM
Updated: Jan 29, 2008 5:21 P

Malaysia's former police chief Abdul Rahim Noor today was sentenced to a two-month prison term and fined RM2,000 for assaulting sacked deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim while he was in police custody on Sept 20, 1998.

Rahim, however, walked free when Sessions Court judge Akhtar Tahir allowed a stay of execution pending an appeal by Rahim against his sentence and allowed a bail of RM5,000 in one surety.

Appearing calm throughout the proceedings, an immaculately dressed Rahim promptly posted bail and left before reporters could approach him for an interview.

Rahim's counsel K.Kumaraendran filed a notice of appeal to the High Court this morning and said the defence is appealing "on the ground that the sentence does not commensurate with the service he (Rahim) has rendered to the nation and society".

Prosecuting officer Salehuddin Saidin, however, said he would have to refer to the Attorney-General Mohtar Abdullah before deciding whether to appeal against the sentence.

"We have to refer to our superior officer (Mohtar) in deciding whether to appeal or not," Salehuddin said.

In passing the sentence, Akhtar said "the court cannot disregard the grave injuries sustained by Anwar".

Anwar, after his arrest, appeared in court with a black eye and said he was beaten while in police custody. A doctor, testifying at the Royal Commission of Enquiry that was set up to investigate Anwar's allegations, said the blows to the head were "potentially lethal".

Describing the assault as "cruel", Akhtar said he "cannot deny the fact that, if not for the Royal Commission, the cruel act (by Rahim) would not have been known".

"The accused, being the police chief, should have acted reasonably even amidst the political tension in the country," Akhtar said.

In the mitigation plea for a minimal sentence, Kumaraendran yesterday told the court that Rahim was under immense pressure because of the massive demonstrations in downtown Kuala Lumpur staged by Anwar's supporters.

Akhtar said the sentence imposed on the ex-chief would be a "lesson to other police officers and the public".

The prosecution, meanwhile, submitted that the court should impose a jail sentence on Rahim as the offence committed by the former police chief is considered "very serious".

Deputy Public Prosecutor Sallehuddin Saidin pointed out that Anwar, handcuffed and blindfolded, was defenceless when he was assaulted by Rahim.

"If this court fails to impose the sentence, it will further erode public confidence on the country's judicial system," Sallehuddin told the court.

In a country where the police enjoy absolute power, this is the first time a former Inspector-General of Police was charged and convicted in a criminal court.

Anwar is currently serving a six-year jail term for corruption and stands trial for sodomy and sexual misconduct. The former finance minister has repeatedly denied all charges and says they were orchestrated by Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad's aides to topple him from power.- Malaysiakini, 18/4/2001

 

Monday, June 08, 2026

Zahid Hamidi(with a 348 majority) MAY have LOST if the about 140,000 Qualified Voters in government detention were able to cast their VOTES - VOTING RIGHT DENIED??? Anwar and Zahid seems to be MPs with the lowest VOTE Share according to AI????


 

WHO has a RIGHT TO VOTE, and who has NO RIGHT to Vote is clearly stated in Article 119(3) of the Federal Constitution

(3) A person is disqualified for being an elector in any election to the House of Representatives or the Legislative Assembly if—

(a) on the qualifying date he is detained as a person of unsound mind or is serving a sentence of imprisonment; or

(b) having before the qualifying date been convicted in any part of the Commonwealth of an offence and sentenced to death or imprisonment for a term exceeding twelve months, he remains liable on the qualifying date to suffer any punishment for that offence

THUS, most clear, that ONE who is NOT yet  tried, convicted and sentenced HAS the right to VOTE, and this is MORE IMPORTANT now, as all qualified Malaysians are now automatically registered as VOTERS - no more the need for the Malaysian to go register himself as Voter before he gets the RIGHT to VOTE.

HENCE, it is a FAILURE of government, and now it is the PM Anwar Ibrahim PH-led MADANI Coalition government... and the GOVERNMENT and the Malaysian Election Commission must do all that is needed to ensure all Malaysians, who have the right to Vote are ABLE to VOTE. 

A RIGHT TO VOTE is a FUNDAMENTAL Human Right of persons in a DEMOCRACY - and a DENIAL OF THIS BASIC RIGHT must be condemned as a GROSS Injustice or VIOLATION of Human Right.

IT MATTERS that all these government detainees in police lock-ups, MACC detention, and detainees who have yet to be tried, convicted and sentenced(Presumption of Innocence) are DENIED the RIGHT and the ABILITY to Vote by the MADANI GOVERNMENT? A person out on BAIL can go VOTE - but a person too poor to afford Bail, or denied Bail by law must be TREATED THE SAME - and allowed the RIGHT TO VOTE. [Only those Tried, Convicted and Sentenced to imprisonment ARE DISQUALIFIED and cannot VOTE - but should be CHANGE even this in the future??]

YES, it MATTERS... as election results for an MP or ADUN can change with just a FEW VOTES - and the NUMBERS of Malaysians denied their RIGHT TO VOTE is HIGH....and significant enough to alter the election results ...

How many in Malaysian prisons and Detention Places that have not yet been tried and found guilty, and ARE NOT SERVING A SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT?

About 132,000 Malaysians, yet to be tried, convicted and sentenced, WHO HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE. 

On sentencing categories, Saifuddin said that of the 355,604 inmates recorded in 2024, 225,961 were remand prisoners, while 129,643 were convicted inmates. Of the remand group, 176,625 were Malaysians and 49,336 were non-citizens, while among the convicted inmates, 86,787 were Malaysians and 42,856 were non-citizens. "As for 2025, 174,356 were remand prisoners and 103,916 were convicted inmates. "Among the remand group, 132,030 were Malaysians and 42,326 were non-citizens, while for convicted inmates, 67,433 were Malaysians and 36,483 were non-citizens." - NST, 18/11/2025

If we estimate, about 5 per lock-up, then it is about 3,500, and if about 10 per lock-up, it will be about 7,000 or more??? ALL who have the right to VOTE but maybe could not exercise to vote because they could not go to the election centres to vote.. 

Malaysia operates a network of over 700 police lock-ups across the country...The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) operates 15 officially gazetted lock-ups across Malaysia. Other than that, there are  Immigration Department, Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA), Customs Department, and National Anti-Drug Agency (AADK) lock-ups too...

THUS, all in all we are talking of about 140,000 or maybe more LEGITIMATE VOTERS who were not able to exercise their RIGHT TO VOTE

Would it influence the OUTCOME of elections if they VOTED > YES, Definitely as a few votes can vary the RESULTS...and thus even change governments 

Pakatan Harapan (PH) chairman Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has officially won the Tambun parliamentary seat with a 5,328-vote majority. Up to midnight, the PKR president secured 32,026 votes, defeating Datuk Seri Ahmad Faizal Azumu of Perikatan Nasional (PN), who polled 26,698 votes. Barisan Nasional candidate Datuk Aminuddin Md Hanafiah garnered 16,275 votes and Parti Pejuang Tanah Air's Abdul Rahim Tahir got 656 votes.

P203 Lubok Antu and P032 Gua Musang was won with less than 200 majority. P075 Bagan Datuk (Perak), the seat that Zahid Hamidi won had just a 348 vote majority> thus if those QUALIFIED VOTERS in remand detention were allowed to vote > the outcome may CHANGE.

POINTS:-

A person who is being detained in Malaysia, who has not yet been CONVICTED and serving a prison sentence, is a QUALIFIED VOTER and thus have the RIGHT TO VOTE

A person on the date of Elections, is being detained as a suspect for the purposes of investigation be it in police lock-ups, MACC or other law enforcement detention places is a QUALIFIED VOTER who must be accorded the RIGHT to VOTE

ONLY Convicted Criminals serving out their prison sentence, like former PM Najib Razak, is DENIED by the Federal Constitution of his RIGHT TO VOTE.

Can persons not yet convicted and sentenced in places of Detention be allowed to VOTE in Malaysia. YES, they can - they could be allowed to vote by POSTAL Votes, or the Election Commission can allow them 'early voting' at their places of Detentions > or for those in police/MACC or other law enforcement detention places > arrangements can be so easily made to ensure that they have the ability to exercise the RIGHT to VOTE..

Same too persons detained or with movement restriction orders preventing them from moving out of a District/Area, they are also may NOT be able to VOTE because they have to some other State or District to cast their votes... 

NOW, the Election Commission has the POWER and ABILITY to ensure that all these 140,000 Malaysians are able to exercise their RIGHT TO VOTE in upcoming elections > and END the DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE, a fundamental right in a DEMOCRACY like Malaysia -- simple too since we know where they are > Just like police, armed forces, election commission officers, etc - their RIGHT to be able to VOTE can be ensured...

Should those who have been advocating FREE and FAIR elections now LOBBY that ALL Qualified Voters can exercise their RIGHT TO VOTE - because it matters as it may determine the outcome of elections, more so, since the ability and freedom to go VOTE is now restricted by the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, now the PM Anwar led PH led MADANI government... 

I did an AI search to see which MPs in GE15 secured the LARGEST Majority, Highest VOTE Share Percentage, and the MPs with the LOWEST Vote Share Percentage for FUN > Interestingly, Zahid Hamidi and our current PM Anwar Ibrahim was listed with the LOWEST Vote Share Percentage in GE15 > now our Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister...

The Top 10 MPs with the Largest Majorities 

1. Gobind Singh Deo (P106 Damansara) Majority: 124,619 votes

  • 2. Wong Chen (P104 Subang) Majority: 115,074 votes
  •  3. Ganabatirau Veraman (P110 Klang) Majority: 91,801 votes
  •  4. Mohamad Sabu (P111 Kota Raja) Majority: 73,998 votes
  •  5. Syahredzan Johan (P102 Bangi) Majority: 69,701 votes
  •  6. Teresa Kok Suh Sim (P122 Seputeh) Majority: 67,187 votes
  •  7. Lim Lip Eng (P114 Kepong) Majority: 61,081 votes
  • 8. Tan Kok Wai (P123 Cheras) Majority: 60,294 votes
  • 9. Liew Chin Tong (P162 Iskandar Puteri) Majority: 60,036 votes
  •  10. Hannah Yeoh Tseow Suan (P117 Segambut) Majority: 59,684 votes 

 The Top 5 MPs with the Highest Vote Share Percentage

1. Teresa Kok Suh Sim (P122 Seputeh) Vote Share Percentage: 83.74%

 2. M. Kulasegaran (P065 Ipoh Barat) Vote Share Percentage: 81.57%

3. Hannah Yeoh Tseow Suan (P117 Segambut) Vote Share Percentage: 80.05%

4. Lim Lip Eng (P114 Kepong) Vote Share Percentage: 72.1%

5. Wong Chen (P104 Subang) Vote Share Percentage: 69.8%

 

The 5 MPs with the Lowest Winning Vote Share
  • 1. Datuk Seri Dr. Ahmad Zahid Hamidi (P075 Bagan Datuk) Vote Share Percentage: 39.65%
  • 2. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (P063 Tambun) Vote Share Percentage: 39.77%
  • 3. Datuk Seri Ikmal Hisham Abdul Aziz (P026 Tanah Merah) Vote Share Percentage: 40.92%
  • 4. Roy Angau Gingkoi (P203 Lubok Antu) Vote Share Percentage: 41.44%
  •  5. Datuk Adnan Abu Hassan (P129 Kuala Pilah) Vote Share Percentage: 41.76%

 ## In the 2018 Port Dickson By-Election, Anwar Ibrahim got a 71.32% vote share, but in the last elections in 2022 General Election (GE15)P063 Tambun he won the seat with a career-low 39.77% vote share 

 NOTE - in another AI search, Zahid and Anwar is listed as No.7 and No.8 ....