Easter - The Call of Jesus to ACT against injustice must be followed - Because we stayed 'silent', we now all suffer the consequence of the US-Israel Illegal War on IRAN?

Jesus, today will be called a Human Rights Defender - who always spoke out against injustices, violation of human rights > and this led to his arrest, torture and execution on the CROSS by the powers of the day. TO be a Christian, means that we personally need to ACT against injustices and human rights violations - not just praying for peace.

 “Why do you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?

Luke 6:46

Now, Palestine at the time of Jesus, was not Free and Independent - it was an OCCUPIED territory by the ROMAN Empire. 

Like West Bank today, the Romans gave the Palestinians certain limited powers to govern certain aspects. The Palestinians then could not EXECUTE anyone (or impose the Death Penalty) - and that is why in the Bible, the Chief priests had to go to Pontius Pilate(the Roman leader responsible of the religion) to get him to SENTENCE Jesus to Death - and so, Jesus ended up being sentenced to TORTURE followed by execution by crucifiction on the cross.

It was 'the chief priests, the officers of the temple guard, and the elders,' that came and arrested Jesus...'Then seizing him, they led him away and took him into the house of the high priest.' - it was   'the council of the elders of the people, both the chief priests and the teachers of the law,..'

They wanted to EXECUTE or KILL Jesus, but they did not have the POWER to do so in Occupied Palestine - so they took Jesus to Pontius Pilate(the Roman in-charge)

Pilate then send him to HEROD as Galilee fell under Herod's Jurisdiction... 

On hearing this, Pilate asked if the man was a Galilean. ⁷ When he learned that Jesus was under Herod’s jurisdiction, he sent him to Herod, who was also in Jerusalem at that time. 

But, after that Herod sends him back to Pilate - who despite finding no basis to sentence him to death, Pilate allowed Jesus to be tortured and then crucified...  

Pilate called together the chief priests, the rulers and the people, ¹⁴ and said to them, “You brought me this man as one who was inciting the people to rebellion. I have examined him in your presence and have found no basis for your charges against him. ¹⁵ Neither has Herod,...

Pilate was 'weak' and rather than antagonizing the Jewish local leadership finally gave in - and Jesus ended up being crucified - hanged on the cross until death...

SO, we need to analyze what Jesus was doing that 'angered' the 'authorities' that ended with him being put to death? Well, Jesus was very VOCAL and public in his views HIGHLIGHTING wrongs and also the wrongdoers, and that angered especially certain Jewish... 

 “Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. 

“Woe to you Pharisees, because you give God a tenth of your mint, rue and all other kinds of garden herbs, but you neglect justice and the love of God. You should have practiced the latter without leaving the former undone....

 “Woe to you Pharisees, because you love the most important seats in the synagogues and respectful greetings in the marketplaces...

Jesus replied, “And you experts in the law, woe to you, because you load people down with burdens they can hardly carry, and you yourselves will not lift one finger to help them. 

 “Woe to you, because you build tombs for the prophets, and it was your ancestors who killed them. ⁴⁸ So you testify that you approve of what your ancestors did; they killed the prophets, and you build their tombs. ⁴⁹ Because of this, God in his wisdom said, ‘I will send them prophets and apostles, some of whom they will kill and others they will persecute.’.. 

“Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering.” When Jesus went outside, the Pharisees and the teachers of the law began to oppose him fiercely and to besiege him with questions,  waiting to catch him in something he might say.

Jesus did NOT discriminate - he treated everyone as equals..

Even the ROMAN Centurion -  “I tell you, I have not found such great faith even in Israel.” ¹⁰ Then the men who had been sent returned to the house and found the servant well.

Samaritan(not Jew) as an example of good - The story of the Good Samaritan -  “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”³⁷ The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.” Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”

Jesus, a Jewish, initiates conversation with a Samaritan woman, breaking taboos regarding ethnicity, gender, and social status.

A Samaritan(person of another religion) - When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?” (His disciples had gone into the town to buy food.) The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.) Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.”

Woman of questionable repute - A woman in that town who lived a sinful life learned that Jesus was eating at the Pharisee’s house, so she came there with an alabaster jar of perfume. ³⁸ As she stood behind him at his feet weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears. Then she wiped them with her hair, kissed them and poured perfume on them. When the Pharisee who had invited him saw this, he said to himself, “If this man were a prophet, he would know who is touching him and what kind of woman she is—that she is a sinner.”...

A CORRUPT public officer - Jesus entered Jericho and was passing through. ² A man was there by the name of Zacchaeus; he was a chief tax collector and was wealthy....When Jesus reached the spot, he looked up and said to him, “Zacchaeus, come down immediately. I must stay at your house today.” ⁶ So he came down at once and welcomed him gladly. All the people saw this and began to mutter, “He has gone to be the guest of a sinner.”...But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, “Look, Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the amount.” Jesus said to him, “Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham. ¹⁰ For the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.”

Today, many claim to be followers of JESUS - but then they are NOT doing what Jesus wanted them to DO. - he wanted all his followers to follow his example > that means SPEAKING OUT against injustices - and also laying blame on the one's responsible. THUS, is it enough to around claiming that you are CHRISTIAN, if all you do is just PRAY? 

Take US President TRUMP, he claims to be a Christian > do you think what he does would be approved by Jesus?

As it was during the time of Jesus, there are still 'BAD' Jews and good Jews - and despite God's sending of so many prophets, and even JESUS - there still remains JEWS like those in the Zionist Regime. Some sadly regard non-JEWS as not people of concern - More than 70,000 have been killed in Gaza, Iran, Lebanon...

It is sad that some Christians support ISRAEL - because of the Bible, and the fact they were paid special attention - RETHINK - Some JEWS are good, but some JEWS like the Zionist regime is not ... we should oppose those JEWS that do wrong, and thus our objection now is NOT against all Jews(a religion) - but only the Zionist Regime, and their supporters... 

There was NO COUNTRY named Israel - but after World War II, some pushed for an Israel State - and it was created by the United Nations, BUT without any consultation or REFERENDUM of the people who had been living in the area - the question whether they want/agree that their land be divided into 2 > A Palestinian State and an Israeli State - So, the peoples' right to SELF DETERMINATION was violated - worse not by some State, but the UNITED NATIONS itself.

Then, what did the NEW State of Israel do? It took the 'broom' and started trying to RID of all non-Jews, and seize their homes and property >   

The Nakba, Arabic for "catastrophe," refers to the 1948 violent displacement and dispossession of Palestinians during the creation of Israel. Over 700,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled, losing their homes and land.

The UN had made a GRAVE MISTAKE because they never foresaw that the new State of Israel will do this > GET rid of the original inhabitants of the land unjustly - it is only after that UN passed resolutions condemning the expulsion of non-Jews, and urging their RETURN and restoration of the property/land - so many UN Resolutions about this, against the building of 'illegal' Jewish settlements > but it has continued, and Israel had not complied with UN demands - and the UN failed to take needed actions (WHY? Because most of the time US, UK and other UN permanent member States will prevent UN Resolutions against Israel by abusing their VETO power).

Would Jesus approve of Israel's actions - the answer is 'NO' - even if a new State of Israel was formed according to law, he will demand EQUALITY for all persons in the land, no persecution based only religion. Remember, before this, Palestine(including where Israel is) was a multi-religious community - Muslims, Jews and Christians and they lived in harmony for centuries... Zionism came in with the migrants who came to Israel - some not all). 

Years later, we saw a similar 'genocidal' act when Myanmmar caused the 'expulsion' of Rohingya - More than 750,000 Rohingya Muslims fled Myanmar. Today, that number is over 1.2 million Rohingya are displaced. Today, the number of Palestinian refugees, including descendants, is estimated at over 8 million.

Israel then started OCCUPYING land beyond its 1947 UN defined Borders - What is Israel's AGENDA - expand its BORDERS, then expel NON-Jewish population, then annex these lands to be part of Israel? WHY did Israel even attack IRAN - Iran had never attacked any of its neighbors - and only historically did defend when attacked?

As Christians - we must CONDEMN the US-Israel war on IRAN - because it was clear violation of the United Nations Charter, and International Law.

We must CONDEMN US for attacking IRAN, when the US and Iran were in the midst of negotiations - when US 'surprisingly attacked' without notice.

IRAN's action, thus far may be justified as a RIGHT TO DEFEND itself, under the UN Charter - given also that they have been primarily targeting US military bases and interest in the Gulf States >  but this war is now affecting the whole world > thus we should call on US and Israel to immediately STOP this war - and then IRAN would follow. Asking IRAN to stop first is UNREASONABLE if US and Israel will continue bombardment.

Israel(can it be trusted/), even after entering a CEASEFIRE agreement, have continued breaching it's commitment/obligation. Hence, it is DIFFICULT to Trust Israel when it comes to an 'CEASEFIRE' agreements.. 

As of late March 2026, more than 600–670 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza by Israeli strikes since the ceasefire agreement took effect in October 2025. Despite the truce,intermittent Israeli military operations have continued, resulting in hundreds of fatalities, bringing the total conflict death toll to over 72,000.

IRAN too does not trust US - because last year in the midst of 'NEGOTIATIONS', US attacked Iran, and the same thing happened again this year. 

Rightly, the UNITED NATIONS should come in, in the person of  António Guterres the current Secretary-General of the United Nations,should initiate and end this WAR. UN also may need to be willing to deploy UN forces to end this war - and if US,Israel and/or Iran violates any agreement towards peace - UN must be ever ready to take action even against the US?

It might be of interest to consider what the Roman Catholic Pope Leo has been saying about this 'illegal' WAR 

Pope Leo delivered an unusually forceful message on Sunday, stating that God rejects the prayers of leaders who initiate wars and possess "hands full of blood", as the conflict in Iran entered its second month. Speaking to tens of thousands gathered in St Peter's Square for Palm Sunday, the celebration that inaugurates the holiest week of the year for the world's 1.4 billion Catholics leading up to Easter, the pontiff asserted that Jesus cannot be invoked to justify any form of warfare. "This is our God: Jesus, King of Peace, who rejects war, whom no one can use to justify war," Leo, the first U.S. pope, told crowds in brilliant sunshine...."(Jesus) does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them, saying: 'Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: your hands are full of blood'," he said, citing a Bible passage. - Independent, 29/3/2026

Pope Leo has said aeroplanes should be “carriers of peace” and that aerial bombardments should be banned, in his latest condemnation of war amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran...“Airplanes should always be carriers of peace, never of war. No one should be afraid that threats of death and destruction might come from the sky,” Leo said. He did not specifically refer to the war on Iran. Guardian, 23/3/2026

Pope Leo spoke on the phone with Israeli President Isaac Herzog on Friday and urged him to “reopen all paths of dialogue” to end the Iran war, the Vatican said. The pope, who has emerged as a sharp critic of the regional conflict, also urged Herzog to protect civilians and promote respect for international and humanitarian law, the Vatican added. - Algemenier, 3/4/2026

AS Christians, we must be reminded that silence is not an option - We have to ACT ...  

⁴⁶ “Why do you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say? ⁴⁷ As for everyone who comes to me and hears my words and puts them into practice, I will show you what they are like. ⁴⁸ They are like a man building a house, who dug down deep and laid the foundation on rock. When a flood came, the torrent struck that house but could not shake it, because it was well built. ⁴⁹ But the one who hears my words and does not put them into practice is like a man who built a house on the ground without a foundation. The moment the torrent struck that house, it collapsed and its destruction was complete.” 

Sadly, many people choose not to bother. They shut their eyes, close their ears...and simply do not bother about anything...and that is WRONG. They are only concerned about their own well-being, and their own families and maybe their own business/jobs > thus not bothered about what happens to other people, in other countries,... this is wrong, for we need to be CONCERNED about every human person, the environment, etc.

The unlawfully commenced Iran War started by US and Israel is TODAY affecting everyone - we feel it with the increase in fuel/gas prices, and an increased cost of living...

The TIME to ACT, as shown by Jesus through his example is NOW.

HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE 

 

 

Pope Leo decries 'atrocious violence' in Iran war, urges ceasefire

By Angelo Amante

 

March 15, 20267:12 PM GMT+7Updated March 15, 2026

 , opens new tab

VATICAN CITY, March 15 (Reuters) - Pope Leo made an impassioned plea on Sunday for an immediate ceasefire ​in the expanding Iran war, lamenting "atrocious violence" that he said had ‌killed thousands of non-combatants and caused suffering across the region.

 

As the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran enters its third week, the first U.S. pope warned that violence would not bring the justice, ​stability and peace that the peoples of the region long for.

Report Ad

"For  ​two weeks, the peoples of the Middle East have been ⁠suffering the atrocious violence of war," the pope said at his weekly Angelus ​prayer in St. Peter's Square.

 

"In the name of Christians in the Middle East ​and of all women and men of good will, I appeal to those responsible for this conflict: Cease fire!" Pope Leo said.

IDEA THAT WAR SOLVES PROBLEMS IS 'ABSURD'

Leo added that ​the situation in Lebanon - ravaged by a war between Israel and the Iran-backed Lebanese ​group Hezbollah - was also a cause of "great concern".

 

"I hope for paths of dialogue that can ‌support ⁠the country's authorities in implementing lasting solutions to the serious crisis currently underway, for the common good of all the Lebanese people," the pope said.

Report Ad

During a visit to a Rome parish later, the pope said war could never ​resolve problems and hit ​out at people ⁠who invoke God to justify killings.

 

"Today many of our brothers and sisters in the world are suffering because of ​violent conflicts, caused by the absurd claim that problems and ​disagreements can ⁠be resolved through war, when instead we must engage in unceasing dialogue for peace," he said during his homily.

 

"Some even go so far as to invoke ⁠the name ​of God to justify these choices of ​death, but God cannot be enlisted by darkness. Rather, He always comes to bring light, hope and ​peace to humanity."

Reporting by Angelo Amante; Editing by Aidan Lewis and Andrew Heavens - Reuters, 15/3/2026

 

Dusuki - wrongful exercise of prosecution powers - charged for murder, when others RTA crime, Charging b4 determining sufficient evidence - Why prosecutor's power must be subject to challenge in court?

During the premiership of Anwar Ibrahim - Dusuki is the 3rd Public Prosecutor (highest rate of change of prosecutors). Now the PM has the power to appoint and remove a Public Prosecutor at any time and that is a PROBLEM - PP then may be threatened to do as PM wants, OR ELSE - that is why we need SECURITY FOR TENURE (until retirement age), and the removal of the Public Prosecutor must be made to be as difficult as it is to remove a Judge.

Follow me on WhatsApp Channel https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6UokfB4hdNugYmph1B 

Many Malaysians are concerned that Public Prosecutors may not be INDEPENDENT - and may be using or abusing their powers to appease the PM or Government - the DNAA of Zahid, the sudden unnecessary NFA announcement that led to Zahid now applying for an acquittal, the withdrawal of the appeal against acquittal of Zahid, the charging of GISBH under SOSMA, etc - TIME to enact laws that allows prosecutor's action to be subject to Judicial Review, etc - so Courts can determine whether Public Prosecutor did wrong or not..

Second, the court may review the exercise of prosecutorial power to determine whether it has contravened constitutional rights. Consider a situation where X and Y were both caught by the police with 5 kg of cocaine prohibited under the Misuse of Drugs Act; however, the Prosecution chooses to charge X with a capital offence which attracts the death penalty (say, trafficking in A kg of drugs) while charging Y with a lesser offence (say, trafficking in only B kg of drugs).[23] The unequal treatment of these persons may potentially constitute an abuse of the prosecutorial discretion, as well as a violation of Article 12(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law.  - Judicial Review of Prosecutorial Decisions by Fun Wei Xuan, Joel

This possible wrongful exercise of prosecution powers and discretion may have happened when the ACCUSED is charged for MURDER, when in many similar cases, they are just charged for a Road Transport Act violation. The speed in which he was charged makes one ask whether prosecution had already completed investigation, and procurred sufficient evidence which prosecution verily beliefs in sufficient to prove a prima facie case, or guilt beyond reasonable doubt > Prosecutor CANNOT charge anyone before this. 

DUSUKI (Malaysia's Public Prosecutor/Attorney General) may have made a MISTAKE when he charged the drunk driver for MURDER, and also for drug consumption, to which the accused already pleaded GUILTY to the drug charges.

There are MANY killing charges - MURDER, Culpable Homicide Not Amounting To Murder, causing death by negligence...

When it comes to MURDER (death is caused is done with the intention of causing death), for culpable homicide (doing anything which he intends or knows to be likely to cause death) - the problem arises in proving INTENTION - more so when someone is drunk or under the influence of drugs... 

The mistake was for charging him also for drugs as well - which he pleaded guilty > so that is now a SERIOUS HURDLE for prosecution to prove INTENTION or even to prove that he intends or knows to be likely to cause death... will a person under the influence of drugs or alcohol have the capacity to form INTENTION or even know that he is likely to cause death?

Separately, Saktygaanapathy pleaded guilty to a charge of self‑administering drugs believed to be benzodiazepines and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), SH reported. The offence was allegedly committed at the Narcotics Office of the Klang District Police Headquarters at 3.30pm the same day.

The charge confirms that he was under the influence of drugs when the accident happened. Was there a mental evaluation conducted to determine even at the police station that he was capable of having the needed INTENTION to kill, or that he did KNOW his actions would cause death - this should be standard operating procedure...

2nd ISSUE

The public prosecutor can only charge anyone for a crime in court ONLY if investigation was complete, and the prosecutor verily believes that he can at least prove in court a PRIMA FACIE case, or better that the person is GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt - this is a settled legal principle. The legal principle as to when one should be CHARGED, Arrested and released on Police Bail - The Case of PP v Tan Kim San, judgement of late Supreme Court Judge Harun Mahmud Hashim

The principle is that a person should not be charged in Court until the investigation into the case against him has been completed and there is prima facie evidence to prosecute him of the charge. In other words, a person should not be put in peril of a criminal trial unless the prosecution is able to prove the case against him. To do otherwise is an injustice.

Yes, we know that he was the driver, when the man was killed - To charge for MURDER, has evidence been acquired by Prosecution that he intended to kill the deceased - if YES, then can charge for MURDER, OR did he know that his action may cause the death of someone (Culpable Homicide Not Amounting To Murder),...If NOT, no one should be CHARGED until investigation is completed and the prosecutor has secured the EVIDENCE required...

Was even the vehicle involved investigated to determine that there was NO mechanical failures (like brakes not working, steering wheel jammed, etc..) because then liability may lie with some other maybe the car manufacturer, or some law enforcement duty bound to check that vehicles are road worthy)  

So, did the Public Prosecutor violate this principle, when he speedily charged the driver for MURDER?

Was it because of 'public pressure' - well, a Public Prosecutor should not be affected by public pressure or even government pressure - he acts PROFESSIONALLY, and will not allow mere feelings or 'bias' to affect him.

THUS, if DUSUKI charged someone for MURDER to appease the Public and/or the Government, he certainly does not QUALIFY to remain Public Prosecutor??? 

3rd ISSUE 

Why was he charged for MURDER when perpetrators in similar cases were not - they ended up being charged for the offence under Section 41 Road Transport Act?   

Section 41 Road Transport Act 1987 -  Causing death by reckless or dangerous driving 

(1) Any person who, by the driving of a motor vehicle on a road recklessly or at a speed or in a manner which having regard to all the circumstances (including the nature, condition and size of the road, and the amount of traffic which is or might be expected to be on the road) is dangerous to the public, causes the death of any person shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than five years and not more than ten years and a fine of not less than twenty thousand ringgit and not more than fifty thousand ringgit and, in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years and not more than fifteen years and a fine of not less than fifty thousand ringgit and not more than one hundred thousand ringgit. 

 Several have raised this issue..

MP Rayer  

However, Rayer raised concerns over another fatal accident on Feb 9 in Batu Gajah, Perak, which claimed the lives of three family members - SR Sarala Devi, 34; G Sarasbathy Gopal, 65; and three-year-old S Shaastikka.

He recalled that in that case, the driver of a Toyota Hilux, who was also believed to be under the influence of THC, was probed under Section 41(1) of the Road Transport Act (RTA) 1987 for reckless and dangerous driving.

And lawyer Lateefah Koya

When contacted, lawyer Latheefa Koya echoed the demand for an explanation, citing another case against lorry driver Rudi Zulkarnain, who was charged on May 16 last year under Section 41 of the RTA for causing the death of nine FRU constables. 

GOOD QUESTION - and maybe PP DUSUKI can answer...

WHY so fast - accident/death happened on 29/3/2026, and he got charged so fast on 1/4/2026 - what about the case Rayer mentioned, have the alleged perpetrator been CHARGED yet? 

There should be NO DISCRIMINATION - all should be treated equally - Let's look at other similar accidents, how was the alleged perpetrator dealt with.

There is a 'PROBLEM' in Malaysia now - some who committed crimes are not being charged - WHY?  

Driver at centre of viral Klang crash faces murder charge, pleads guilty to drug offence

The driver at the centre of a viral crash that hurled a motorcyclist onto another car was brought before the Magistrates’ Court here today to face a murder charge and a separate drug offence. — Bernama pic

By Malay Mail

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2026 11:26 AM MYT

KLANG, April 1 — The driver at the centre of a viral crash that hurled a motorcyclist onto another car was brought before the Magistrates’ Court here today to face a murder charge and a separate drug offence.

According to Sinar Harian (SH), R. Saktygaanapathy, 28, nodded to indicate he understood when the murder charge was read before Magistrate A. Karthiyayini. No plea was recorded as the case falls under the jurisdiction of the High Court.

He is accused of murdering Amirul Hafiz Omar, 33, on Jalan Raya Barat at 11.47am on March 29.

The charge is framed under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which carries the death penalty or imprisonment of between 30 and 40 years. If the death sentence is not imposed, the law requires no fewer than 12 strokes of the cane.

Separately, Saktygaanapathy pleaded guilty to a charge of self‑administering drugs believed to be benzodiazepines and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), SH reported.

The offence was allegedly committed at the Narcotics Office of the Klang District Police Headquarters at 3.30pm the same day.

That charge was brought under Section 15(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, which provides for a fine of up to RM5,000 or a maximum two years’ imprisonment upon conviction.

Deputy public prosecutor Raja Zaizul Faridah Raja Zaharudin conducted the prosecution, while the accused was unrepresented. - Malay Mail, 1/4/2026

 

Suspend Azam Baki NOW Pending Investigation to Reduce Risk of Tampering of Evidence - don't wait until term ends in May?

 

Media Statement – 2/4/2026

Suspend Azam Baki NOW Pending Investigation to Reduce Risk of Tampering of Evidence

Azam Baki, the Chief Commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) must be immediately suspended pending completion of the investigation on the shareholding and the ‘corporate mafia’ scandal that alleged abuse of power by MACC officers.

It is foolhardy not to immediately suspend, and deny Azam physical or even remote access to MACC as he is now a suspect, that may have committed crimes, or maybe involved in crimes. The capacity and the possibility of tampering with evidence must be eliminated. Likewise, all other MACC officers who are suspected to be involved in crimes being investigated must also be immediately suspended temporarily until investigations are completed.

Suspension pending completion of investigation is a temporary, neutral action where any suspected wrongdoer or criminal is removed from the workplace for the purpose of investigation. It is not a disciplinary action itself or proof of guilt.  The purpose is to allow for an impartial/independent investigation while keeping the workplace safe, evidence secure and/or preventing any interference with the investigation.

Azam Baki is CHIEF not a mere employee

Azam Baki is not a mere employee or a public officer, but the Chief Commissioner of MACC, and as such he has ‘great power’ and/or influence over all of his subordinates, and access to all matters within MACC – and will be in a position of being able to tamper or ‘disappear’ any evidence that may implicate him and/or others of crimes.

Initially, it was thought that the Cabinet was just investigating Azam Baki’s shareholding – to determine whether at any time he committed an employment misconduct because he owned more that RM100,000 worth of shares, but this has been recently clarified by the Minister.

Azam Being Investigated on both ‘The Corporate Mafia’ Issue, Not Simply About his having more than RM100,000 Shares

Doubts resolved, when on 1/4/2026, it was reported in the media that the investigation is not just about Azam’s shareholding value, but also about the corporate mafia scandal.

‘Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil said the investigation into alleged corporate manipulation linked to MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki, including his shareholdings and claims of a “corporate mafia”, are ongoing and will be made public in due course. He emphasised that the inquiry must be thoroughly completed before any further action can be considered…

“As clarified by the AMLA this past Monday, the investigation is still ongoing. It is therefore essential to ensure the inquiry is fully completed before any further action is taken,” he said during the ministry’s weekly press conference here today…

Fahmi also said following guidance from the Cabinet, particularly Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, any announcements will be made once the two aspects of the investigation have been completed...’ (Malay Mail, 1/4/2026)

The Minister was probably referring to the investigations by Bukit Aman Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing (AMLA) investigation unit. “This case involves several people suspected of committing money laundering offences through various methods, including the acquisition or ownership of publicly listed companies on Bursa Malaysia, as well as private companies,” he (AMLA investigation unit chief Fazlisyam Abd Majid) said at a press conference here today. (FMT, 30/3/2026).

If that be the case, then should not have Azam and other MACC officers suspected rightly be suspended right from the start of that AMLA investigations pending the completion of investigation?

The risk of tampering/destroying evidence is real

The risk of tampering/destroying evidence even in the custody of law enforcement is REAL – remembering also how the Malaysian former spy probably got a DNAA because of this.

‘The [3 MACC] officers, who were detained last week, had allegedly stolen a portion of US$6 million (S$8.1 million) seized from the former director-general of the Malaysian External Intelligence Organisation (MEIO), Datuk Hasanah Abdul Hamid. Some of the stolen cash was replaced with counterfeit currency.’ (Straits Times, 20/9/2021). As a result, the former spy ended up with a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA).

In this case, the suspect is the Chief of MACC, and hence the ability and the risk of tampering with evidence is so much higher.

Rightly, Azam and/or other MACC officers suspected who were being investigated should have been suspended, and their physical and/or virtual access to MACC denied right from the point the AMLA unit started investigations until investigations are completed, and they are found to be innocent.

PM Should Not Be Involved Because of possible ‘Conflict of Interest’?

With regard the Prime Minister, MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) believes, that since the MACC comes under the jurisdiction of the Prime Minister’s Department, and the PM also is the one who chose Azam Baki as the MACC Chief Commissioner, he should best not be involved in this particular investigation or related matters, by reason of possible ‘conflict of interest’ issues.

How Can MACC Independently Investigate Offences Under the MACC Act?

Some offences may come under the jurisdiction of the MACC, not the police, and thus only the MACC can reasonably investigate such offences under the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009.

As such, MADPET proposes that some other, preferably not from MACC, be appointed in the interim to carry out the duties of the MACC Chief Commissioner so that offences under the MACC Act can also be investigated independently. Other officers, from other law enforcement bodies, should also be assigned to the MACC for this purpose. When it comes to the ‘corporate mafia’, there is still uncertainty as to which MACC officers may have been involved.

Justice must be not only be done, but must be seen to be done. As such, there must be independent investigation and prosecutions, and certainly alleged suspects should never be involved in the investigations.

It is fundamental that only law enforcement and the prosecution are responsible for acting independently when laws are broken.

The Prime Minister and/or the Cabinet should not be in any way be involved in deciding how an alleged crime is investigated or not investigated. It is also not the role of the Chief Secretary to the Government. We have laws, that already imposes duties of law enforcement to investigate when laws are broken.

If others, including the Prime Minister, Minister and even public officers, are involved, they open themselves to possible allegations of crimes of interference and/or obstruction of justice including the Obstruction of investigation (sec. 48 MACC Act) and the crime of obstructing any public servant in the discharge of his public functions (sec. 186 Penal Code).

Anyone who breaks the law will be treated equally, irrespective of the position he/she may hold. This is guaranteed by Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, when it says ‘(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.’ This means that no one is above the law, and no one will receive any ‘special treatment’ liked delayed investigation and/or prosecution’ just because of the position he/she holds.

Azam Baki’s term ends in about a month on 5/5/2026, but this should never impact considerations of whether to suspend him pending investigations or not. He should have been suspended as soon as AMLA started investigating the ‘corporate media’, and now, he must be immediately be suspended pending end of investigation. The concern is tampering with evidence.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

 

 

Fahmi: MACC investigation into Azam Baki’s shareholdings, ‘corporate mafia’ claims to be made public

Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil said the investigation into the shareholdings of Tan Sri Azam Baki, chief commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, is still ongoing. — Picture by Raymond Manuel

By Anis Zalani

Wednesday, 01 Apr 2026 6:15 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR, April 1 — Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil said the investigation into alleged corporate manipulation linked to MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki, including his shareholdings and claims of a “corporate mafia”, are ongoing and will be made public in due course.

He emphasised that the inquiry must be thoroughly completed before any further action can be considered.

“As clarified by the AMLA this past Monday, the investigation is still ongoing. It is therefore essential to ensure the inquiry is fully completed before any further action is taken,” he said during the ministry’s weekly press conference here today.

He then said that updates on the investigation may be disclosed publicly, but any further steps remain subject to the Cabinet’s decision should they determine at any point that the investigation has reached a stage where additional action is necessary.

Fahmi also said following guidance from the Cabinet, particularly Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, any announcements will be made once the two aspects of the investigation have been completed.

“The matter has been entrusted to the Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar, who will oversee the implementation of the necessary procedures,” he added.

Yesterday, it was reported that the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) will take action against Bloomberg over its claims that Anwar Ibrahim interfered in the disclosure of findings concerning Azam Baki shareholdings.

Shamsul Azri also dismissed the foreign news agency’s March 30 report, which alleged that the prime minister had instructed a special committee to delay the release of the investigation into Azam Baki. - Malay Mail, 1/4/2026

Victor Chin arrested, freed on bail in money laundering probe

3 days ago

FMT Reporters

Bukit Aman’s Amla investigation unit chief Fazlisyam Abd Majid says the businessman 'may be recalled if necessary'.

Bukit Aman’s Amla investigation unit chief Fazlisyam Abd Majid said Victor Chin was detained in December last year and has since been released on police bail. (MMAG pic)

PETALING JAYA:

Police have confirmed that businessman Victor Chin was among 10 people detained on suspicion of involvement in money laundering activities under Ops Viking.

The operation was conducted between Oct last year and Jan 13 this year, said Bukit Aman Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing (Amla) investigation unit chief Fazlisyam Abd Majid, Bernama reported.

Fazlisyam said Chin was detained in December last year and has since been released on police bail although he may be recalled if necessary.

He said the other six men and three women, believed to be directly linked to the investigation, had also been released on bail. Another 40 have been called in to provide statements.

“This case involves several people suspected of committing money laundering offences through various methods, including the acquisition or ownership of publicly listed companies on Bursa Malaysia, as well as private companies,” he said at a press conference here today.

Fazlisyam highlighted that the operation resulted in the freezing and seizure of various assets, including eight properties, 32 vehicles, 1,100 shares in two private limited companies, Central Depository System (CDS) accounts totalling RM323,588,293, trading accounts amounting to RM64,246,417, and 404 bank accounts holding RM85,624,528.

Fazlisyam said the operation was launched in Oct last year based on intelligence on money laundering activities dating back to 2018.

A formal investigation opened on Oct 25.

He said all parties suspected of being directly or indirectly involved in managing funds derived from unlawful activities are under investigation.

The probe is being carried out under Section 27B and Section 29B of the Moneylenders Act 1951, Section 176 of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 and Section 221 of the Companies Act 2016.

On March 16, the police confirmed that they had raided several premises belonging to Chin, who is alleged to be involved in corporate manipulation linked to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission.

Separately, Fazlisyam noted that authorities have not received any report regarding Chin’s claim that an MP had demanded RM10 million to assist in resolving the corporate manipulation issue. - FMT, 30/3/2026

Three Malaysian graft busters detained for allegedly stealing funds in case involving former spy chief

Get insights on the biggest stories in Malaysia

Former Malaysian spy chief Hasanah Abdul Hamid was charged in 2018 with criminal breach of trust, but was later granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal in the High Court.

Published Sep 20, 2021, 04:54 PM

KUALA LUMPUR - Three Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers have been arrested for allegedly misappropriating funds connected to a case involving the country's former spymaster, further tarnishing the image of the agency.

 

The officers, who were detained last week, had allegedly stolen a portion of US$6 million (S$8.1 million) seized from the former director-general of the Malaysian External Intelligence Organisation (MEIO), Datuk Hasanah Abdul Hamid. Some of the stolen cash was replaced with counterfeit currency.

 

The former spy chief was charged in 2018 with criminal breach of trust involving RM50.4 million (S$16.3 million) belonging to the government.

 

But in April, she was granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal in the High Court. This means that she can be hauled up to court again if fresh evidence arises.

 

During investigations into her case, the MACC had seized cash and other belongings from her.

A source told The Straits Times that the three suspects were part of a "special team" assigned to probe into the allegations of power abuse and malpractice involving the former MEIO chief.

 

"They belong to a very 'exclusive' team. It's a known fact among the agency's investigating officers that they have a close relationship with the chief," the source said, referring to MACC chief Azam Baki.

 

The arrest of the anti-graft busters came to light after a blog called Edisi Siasat posted an entry revealing the details on Sept 18.

 

It claimed that Madam Hasanah had gone to retrieve the money, only to discover that a portion had been replaced with fake notes, prompting her to file a police report.

 

But Malaysia's Criminal Investigation Department chief Abd Jalil Hassan on Monday (Sept 20) said in a statement that he had yet to receive any police report regarding the alleged abuse of power and misappropriation of funds.

 

All three suspects were said to have been remanded by the commission for six days from Sept 14, according to the blog, which questioned why their case was being treated as an internal investigation instead of a police case.

 

Responding to the blog's revelations, the commission confirmed that it has arrested three of its officers to assist in investigations into allegations of abuse of power and malpractice in the case of a former department head.

 

"The three officers were brought before the Putrajaya Magistrate's Court and remanded under Section 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code for six days from Sept 14 to Sept 19, 2021," it said in a statement.

 

It added that a thorough investigation is under way.

 

"MACC would like to emphasise that the commission will not compromise or protect any of its officers involved in any criminal act and will take appropriate action if the act is true," the MACC said.

 

This is not the first time that the MACC has found itself embroiled in a scandal involving its own.

 

On June 15, an MACC officer was charged with allegedly conspiring with another man to receive RM100,000 in cash to shield an individual from being investigated under the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001.

 

In April, two MACC officials were among 12 enforcement officers nabbed by the Malaysian police for their alleged links with Malaysian fugitive businessman Nicky Liow Soon Hee.

 

Liow, 33, who is wanted for alleged money laundering and organised crime activities, is said to have ties to convicted Hong Kong triad boss Wan Kuok-Koi, also known as Broken Tooth.... Straits Times, 20/9/2021

 

Deterrent Sentence YES but NO to Death Penalty for causing death in road accidents

 

 

Media Statement – 1/4/2026

Deterrent Sentence YES but NO to Death Penalty for causing death in road accidents

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) is appalled by the call of Machang MP Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal(formerly of BERSATU) urging the government to study amending ‘the law to allow for the death penalty to be imposed on drunk drivers who cause death.’(FMT, 30/3/2026). A deterrent sentence may be required, but not death penalty – where in Malaysia, a person is hanged to death.

Mandatory Death Penalty Abolished but Courts still sentencing to Death

Malaysia abolished the mandatory death penalty – but sadly the death penalty still remains in Malaysia. The Abolition Of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 (AMDP Act 2023), which came into force on 4/7/2023, now still gives the court the power to impose the death penalty – and sadly Malaysian Courts are still continue to use the death penalty.

On 10/3/2026, for example, the Court of Appeal upheld the death sentences imposed on the Klang Valley couple involved in the 2020 Sibu ‘suitcase murder’.(Malay Mail, 10/3/2026)

On 9/1/2026, it was reported that Malaysian-based Nigerian, Ibekwe Emeka Augustine was sentenced to death by hanging for murdering a four-year-old boy in 2020. “You are sentenced to death by hanging until you are dead. However, you have the right to appeal against the sentence at the Court of Appeal,”, said High Court judge K. Muniandy.(Peoples Gazette, 9/1/2026).

As a consequence, the numbers on Death Row is increasing again.

When the mandatory death penalty was abolished, Malaysia also enacted the Revision of Sentence of Death and Imprisonment for Natural Life (Temporary Jurisdiction of the Federal Court) Act 2023, which came into force on 12/9/2023, to enable the Federal Court to review the death sentence of those on death row, and it resulted in most death sentences being revised to imprisonment and whipping sentences. However, the Federal Court retained the death sentence for some.

On 21/11/2025, Azalina Othman Said, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform), said that a total of 863 inmates facing the death penalty have had their sentences commuted or reduced However, 49 remain on death row as of October 2024. Today, the number on death would have now increased. (Star, 21/11/2025)

NO more mechanism to revise Death Sentence of Death Row inmates

The major problem now, is that the ability of the Federal Court to revise death sentences was only a temporary provision, and now, those on death row still and thereafter, have no longer this option of applying to the Federal Court to revise their death sentence. This means the numbers on death row will only increase with time.

MADPET calls for an enactment of a law that will permanently be available to death row inmates to apply to court for their death sentence to be revised, and it best be revised to an alternative sentence avoiding anymore persons being hanged to death.

The new Indonesian Penal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru or KUHP Baru), which should have come into force on 2/1/2026, with regards to death penalty, now imposes a ten-year probationary period, during which good behaviour may lead to the death sentence being reduced to  imprisonment.(The Jakarta Post, 22/12/2025)

Malaysia should totally abolish the death penalty, and until then enact a law, that ensures death sentence is not carried out, requiring the court to review death sentence, periodically maybe once every 2 – 5 years, taking into account good behaviour and repentance, that may lead to a revision of the death penalty to a sentence of imprisonment. Forgiveness and 2^nd chances are matters that Malaysians do accept.

Minister Azalina said the government has formed a task force to reassess the country’s death penalty policy and long-term direction. “The review is expected to be completed by January 2026, after which its recommendations, including the future of the execution moratorium, will be presented to the Cabinet,” (Star, 21/11/2025). It is April 2026, and we have not yet heard anything.

MADPET hopes that Malaysia will abolish death penalty, and in the interim a law is enacted to speedily deal with the rising numbers on death row.

Death Caused by Road Accidents

While, this Malaysian politician focusses on drunk driving, some of the causes of road accidents that resulted in deaths in Malaysia have been by reason of the failure of law enforcement and the government.

“The failure of the bus braking system, which was contaminated and inconsistent, combined with driving at speeds exceeding safe limits, led to a loss of vehicle control. Challenging road conditions, weaknesses in the design and installation of road barriers and the structural failure of the bus cabin further increased the severity of the impact and the resulting injuries,” the report (the Transport Ministry report on the 9/6/2025 bus crash in Gerik, Perak, that killed 15 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) students) read.(Star, 24/1/2026). If the braking system fails, can any driver be reasonably blamed for speeding?

Was the regular inspection of road-worthiness of the bus properly carried out by the relevant law enforcement? Or did lackadaisical attitude and ‘corruption’ prevent or ‘compromise’ law enforcement?

‘Apart from that, road markings have worn out and guardrails are defective.’ (FMT, 31/1/2026)

It is sad that we do not see any criminal actions taken against the Government and public officers, when their actions (or failures) may have caused road accidents that caused deaths, and MADPET calls for enactment of laws that imposes criminal liability on even Ministers(personally), and public officers, who by their action/omission contributed and/or caused fatal road traffic accidents and also fatal industrial accidents.

DUI – Alcohol and DRUGS

Driving under influence, is and must be a crime but it must apply also to drugs, and not just alcohol.

Does Malaysia now have an effective way of determining whether drivers are under the influence of drugs?

Should laws be enacted barring drug users from driving until proven that they are no more drug consumers? Focusing on alcohol only is just not enough in DUI (driving under influence) cases.

Many countries impose the death penalty for a variety of offences, including corruption, but Malaysia should abolish the death penalty for all crimes, and never increase death penalty for any new crimes including driving under the influence that caused death.

JUSTICATION for abolition of Death Penalty clear

MADPET notes that the death penalty is cruel, inhumane, violates the right to life, and there is the high possibility of miscarriage of justice, which cannot ever be reversed if the convicted is already dead.

Death Penalty goes against the religious and values of Malaysians, where our faith or beliefs advocate for compassion, forgiveness and second chances.

Death penalty also inadvertently makes all Malaysians ‘murderers’ – as it is intentional killing by the State.

MADPET reiterates the call for the total abolition of the death penalty in Malaysia, and a moratorium on execution pending abolition; and

MADPET calls on Malaysian political parties, MPs and peoples’ representatives, to make a clear public commitment for the abolition of the death penalty.

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

 

MP moots death penalty for drunk drivers in fatal crashes

2 days ago

FMT Reporters

An MP from PAS meanwhile calls for lifetime driving bans for offenders after the fatal crash in Klang yesterday.

A dashcam video clip believed to be of the accident showed an overtaking car crashing into an oncoming motorcycle.

PETALING JAYA:

An opposition MP has called on the government to consider imposing the death penalty for convicted drunk drivers after the crash in Klang yesterday involving a driver under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

Machang MP Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal said the stiffer penalties enacted under the Road Transport Act in 2020 failed to deter offenders from drink driving.

“Therefore, I urge the government to study amending the law to allow for the death penalty to be imposed on drunk drivers who cause death.

“When someone under the influence still chooses to drive, the law should consider that the person has intent to kill, because their actions clearly have a high risk of killing others,” the former Bersatu leader said in a Facebook post.

Jerantut MP Khairil Nizam Khirudin meanwhile called for lifetime driving bans for all drink driving offenders, saying suspensions are insufficient.

The PAS leader said the government must take a far tougher line on drink driving given the threat offenders pose to other road users, making it a matter of public safety rather than just a traffic offence.

He said the government should strengthen enforcement under the Road Transport Act and ensure that stiff punishments are consistently imposed.

“One more life has been lost. One more family has been destroyed. Justice must be served,” he said in a statement, urging transport minister Loke Siew Fook to take action.

Under Section 44 of the Road Transport Act, those convicted of causing death while driving under the influence may face 10 to 15 years in prison and a fine of between RM50,000 and RM100,000.

They will also be barred from holding a driving licence for at least 10 years from the date of their conviction.Repeat offenders can face 15 to 20 years’ jail, a RM100,000 to RM150,000 fine, and a 20-year ban from driving.

A motorcyclist was killed in Klang yesterday morning after being rammed by a car driven by a man in his 20s who was driving under the influence.

A dashcam video clip posted online showed an overtaking car in the opposite lane crashing into an oncoming motorcyclist, sending the victim flying into the air and landing on top of another vehicle.

The suspect has been remanded until Thursday.

PAS Youth chief Afnan Hamimi Taib Azamudden has offered free legal aid to the victim’s family to ensure justice for the deceased. - FMT, 30/3/2026

49 still on death row, says Azalina

 

A total of 863 inmates facing the death penalty have had their sentences commuted or reduced, says Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said.

However, 49 remain on death row as of October 2024, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said.

“Although the mandatory death penalty has been abolished, judges still retain the discretion to impose capital punishment,” she said in a written parliamentary reply yesterday.

Azalina was replying to a question from Ramkarpal Singh (PH-Bukit Gelugor), who had asked whether the government intends to extend the moratorium on executions for prisoners whose death sentences have been upheld by the Federal Court.r

Under the Review of Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment Act 2023, the mandatory death penalty was abolished and the number of offences that carry capital punishment was reduced.

Azalina said the government has formed a task force to reassess the country’s death penalty policy and long-term direction.

“The group will work with the Criminal Law Reform Committee and conduct holistic stakeholder engagements, including with criminal law experts, families of death row inmates and families of victims.

“The review is expected to be completed by January 2026, after which its recommendations, including the future of the execution moratorium, will be presented to the Cabinet,” she added. 

Azalina stressed that the moratorium on executions, which has been in place since 2018, remains.

The move reflects the government’s commitment to fair trial standards, human rights considerations, and balancing justice for victims with the wider public interest. - Star, 21/11/2025

System failure, human error caused Upsi bus tragedy

By JUSTIN ZACK

Saturday, 24 Jan 2026

PETALING JAYA: Speeding, brake failure and human error have been found in the bus crash in Gerik, Perak, that killed 15 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (Upsi) students, say the comprehensive investigation report commissioned by the government following the June 9 incident last year.

In a 188-page report released by the Transport Ministry yesterday, the special task force concluded that a combination of factors, including mechanical, human, environmental and organisation elements were to blame.

“The failure of the bus braking system, which was contaminated and inconsistent, combined with driving at speeds exceeding safe limits, led to a loss of vehicle control. Challenging road conditions, weaknesses in the design and installation of road barriers and the structural failure of the bus cabin further increased the severity of the impact and the resulting injuries,” the report read.

It also said that all passenger seats, as well as the co-driver seat, were not equipped with seat belts.

The bus also lacked onboard cameras or GPS devices, and no internal footage from the vehicle was obtained.

“The footage used in the analysis was obtained from another public vehicle and served as the primary source for the incident’s reconstruction and kinematic analysis,” said the investigators from various institutions and agencies, including the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research, Land Public Transport Agency and Road Transport Depart­ment.

Investigators said the braking system lost its integrity, while the bus was being driven at an inappropriate speed just before the incident.

“Aggressive braking at high speed caused a rapid increase in brake component temperatures ... progressively reducing braking effectiveness,” said the investigators.

A simulation using kinematic analysis, together with footage from another vehicle, estimated the bus’ speed when entering the curve to be 114.7kph, well above the 60kph limit for that stretch, and also surpassed the critical threshold for skidding and rollover, estimated to be between 111.3kph and 114.5kph.

One of the two bus drivers was also using a licence that had expired since 1998 when the privately chartered bus collided with an MPV headed in the same direction along the East-West Highway near Gerik.

Other than the 15 students who died, the incident also left 33 others injured, making it the deadliest road accident in Malaysia since the 2013 Genting Highlands bus crash that killed 37. - Star, 24/1/2026

 

UPSI bus tragedy was no accident but a system failure

2 months ago

Letter to the Editor

If the mishap is treated as an isolated incident, rather than a warning, the system will fail again.

From Rahman Hussin

The release of the transport ministry’s final report on the investigation into the fatal UPSI bus crash on the East-West Highway should mark a turning point in how Malaysia understands road safety.

Not because the findings are shocking but because they confirm, with uncomfortable clarity, what transport safety research has long warned us: fatal crashes are rarely caused by a single mistake. They happen when multiple weaknesses in the system align.

This was not simply a case of a bus losing control.

It was a case of a safety system that failed to protect people when things went wrong.

For those who observe transport systems over time, the patterns revealed in this report are familiar. The investigation shows that the bus had passed routine inspection, yet still suffered critical brake failure under real downhill operating conditions.

This exposes a structural weakness in how we regulate safety, one that prioritises static compliance over dynamic risk.Passing an inspection does not mean a vehicle is safe in all operating environments.

Long-distance, overnight travel and hilly routes place very different demands on braking systems, maintenance quality, and driver management. Yet our regulatory framework largely treats all operations as equal, despite their vastly different risk profiles.

The road itself also failed.

The crash occurred on a steep, dark, sharply curved stretch with limited view at a distance. Apart from that, road markings have worn out and guardrails are defective.

These are not minor details. Internationally, modern road safety policy is built on a simple principle: people will make mistakes, but infrastructure should not turn those mistakes into fatalities.

In this case, roadside barriers that should have absorbed impact instead penetrated the bus structure, worsening injuries. Poor delineation and visibility reduced the margin for recovery. The road did not forgive error, it amplified its consequences.

Perhaps most troubling is what the report reveals about survivability.

Passengers were not protected by seat belts. Structural intrusion occurred during the rollover. Several victims were ejected. These outcomes were not inevitable; they reflect design and policy decisions made over time. Malaysia regulates buses primarily to operate but not to withstand crashes.

Globally, the focus has shifted from crash prevention alone to injury mitigation and survivability, particularly for high-occupancy vehicles operating in demanding conditions. Seat belts, rollover protection, interior integrity and restraint systems are no longer optional considerations. They are baseline safety expectations.

The investigation also exposes deeper governance questions. Maintenance occurred outside authorised frameworks. Licensing compliance slipped through enforcement gaps. Safety responsibility was distributed across agencies, each performing its function, yet no single entity owning the system outcome.

This is how systemic failure manifests: everyone complies within their silo, yet people still die.

The lesson from the UPSI tragedy is not about assigning blame. It is about recognising that road safety is a system, and systems must be designed to fail safely. This mirrors how other countries have reduced fatalities, not by perfecting people, but by strengthening systems.

If Malaysia is serious about reducing road deaths, the conversation must move beyond enforcement slogans and inspection checklists. We need risk-based regulation, infrastructure that forgives error, vehicles designed for survivability, and governance that treats safety as an integrated outcome, not a shared afterthought.

The report has done its job.

Now the harder task begins — learning from it; honestly, systemically, and without defensiveness.

Because if we treat this as an isolated tragedy, rather than a warning, the system will fail again.

Rahman Hussin is the executive director of MY Mobility Vision, a transport think tank. - FMT, 31/1/2026

 

Malaysian court sentences Nigerian Ibekwe Augustine to death for murder, sex crime

High Court judge K. Muniandy sentenced Mr Augustine to death after convicting him of murder on Friday.

Ahmed Oluwasanjo • January 9, 2026

Noose used to illustrate the story

A Malaysian-based Nigerian, Ibekwe Emeka Augustine, has been sentenced to death by hanging for murdering a four-year-old boy in 2020.

Mr Augustine has been on trial for murdering his four-year-old step-grandson by throwing him from the third floor of an apartment and also sexually assaulting his 25-year-old stepdaughter, Malaysian local media reported on Friday.

High Court judge K. Muniandy sentenced Mr Augustine to death after convicting him of murder on Friday.

"You are sentenced to death by hanging until you are dead. However, you have the right to appeal against the sentence at the Court of Appeal,” Mr Muniandy said.

The judge also sentenced Mr Augustine to one year in prison for attempted suicide, five years for sexually assaulting his then 25-year-old stepdaughter, five years for attempted murder of his son, then aged 7, and 14 years for causing grievous hurt to his wife.

“All these inhumane and despicable acts of the accused could have been stopped, as the accused’s wife attempted to do so, but the accused persisted even after grievously injuring her.

“The victims were all traumatised by the entire incident and had to run away from the home before anything more dreadful was inflicted on them,” Mr Muniandy said.

Before the judge pronounced judgment, Mr Augustine had pleaded for leniency, stating, “I regret everything that happened, and it will not happen again. I remember going swimming and playing football with him. Please have mercy on me. Everything is in your hands.”

Mr Augustine’s counsel, Zulkifli Awang, had pleaded for leniency over the death sentence, arguing that his client threw the child from the third floor under drug intoxication.

“The facts show that his actions were due to schizophrenia and that he was of unsound mind, although the court had ruled that self-intoxication is not a defence,” Mr Awang said.

“But I want to stress that what occurred was due to his insanity, due to drug consumption. He has been in remand since his arrest, and he is repentant. Imprisonment would be a more appropriate sentence. It is not necessary to take another life.” - Peoples Gazzette, 9/1/2026

Indonesia's modernized penal code ratification represents positive transformation  

Indra Allen and Agnes Wardhana (Partner and Junior Partner at PwC Legal Indonesia) Jakarta Mon, December 22, 2025 (Courtesy of PWC Indonesia) 

I ndonesia is set to implement the New Indonesian Penal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru or KUHP Baru), scheduled to come into effect on Jan. 2, 2026, enacted through Law No. 1 of 2023. The change demonstrates the country’s move away from a colonial-era criminal justice framework and reflects a modernized legal system rooted in national values and aligned with contemporary international norms. Overall, the reforms represent a deliberate move toward a more balanced and humane criminal justice system that prioritizes fairness, reduces reliance on incarceration and promotes societal healing. Among the most significant developments in this reform is the expanded and clarified regime of corporate criminal liability, a development that signals heightened responsibilities and potential risks for businesses across Indonesia. Understanding these changes is essential for corporations, legal practitioners and stakeholders as they navigate the shifting legal landscape. Introducing a new philosophy The shift is the new development highlights restoration over retribution, a clear distinction from its predecessor of KUHP Lama, which has long characterized Indonesia’s criminal law. The KUHP Baru reflects a fundamental reorientation of criminal justice objectives, endorsing restorative justice as the central sentencing philosophy. The retributive system that emphasizes punishment, particularly through incarceration, has contributed to practical challenges such as prison overcrowding and has often been critiqued for neglecting victim interests and social reintegration. In contrast, restorative justice seeks to redress this imbalance by focusing on repairing harm, rehabilitating offenders and restoring relationships between offenders, victims and the community. Viewpoint Every Thursday Whether you're looking to broaden your horizons or stay informed on the latest developments, "Viewpoint" is the perfect source for anyone seeking to engage with the issues that matter most. View More Newsletter By registering, you agree with The Jakarta Post's Privacy Policy Aiming for a greater structural change in the new penal code, KUHP Baru abolishes the former categorical distinction between “crimes” and “violations,” consolidating all unlawful acts under a single classification of “offenses.” Judges now have greater discretion to apply sanctions tailored to individual circumstances, streamlining prosecution and enabling a more contextual approach to justice. Modernized sanctions KUHP Baru introduces a more nuanced and flexible approach to criminal sanctions, moving away from rigid frameworks toward proportionality and fairness. While the code retains the traditional categories of principal and additional sanctions, it significantly broadens the range of options available to judges, allowing penalties to be tailored to the circumstances of each case.

One of the most notable changes is the death penalty. Rather than being a standard punishment for certain crimes, it is now positioned as an exceptional measure, applied only as an alternative to life imprisonment or a lengthy fixed-term sentence. It now comes with an imposition of a ten-year probationary period, during which good behaviour may lead to a reduction to life imprisonment through presidential clemency. This reflects a more cautious and humane approach, consistent with global human rights trends. 

The new code also introduces greater flexibility in its application. Fixed-term sentences can range from as little as one day to 15 years, extendable to 20 years under aggravating circumstances, while life imprisonment remains available for the most serious offences. Meanwhile, financial penalties varies into eight tiers, ranging from Rp 1 million to Rp 50 billion, enabling courts to impose penalties that are proportionate to both the gravity of the offence and the offender’s financial capacity. The most striking is the emphasis on non-custodial measures, where community service and supervisory sanctions are now recognised as principal options, signalling a shift toward rehabilitation and reintegration rather than mere punishment. These measures can be adapted to individual circumstances, with community service ranging from 8 to 240 hours. Additional sanctions include the revocation of certain rights, confiscation of assets, public announcements of convictions, compensation to victims and fulfilment of customary obligations. Special measures such as counselling, rehabilitation and vocational training are also introduced in the new penal code. Corporate criminal liability It is underlined in articles 45 to 50 that the KUHP Baru formally recognize corporations as autonomous legal subjects capable of engaging in criminal conduct and being held liable independently of natural persons. The new advancement acknowledges that liability extends not only to corporations but also to executives, directors, commissioners, managers and other decision makers, including external controlling parties and beneficial owners. Corporate liability arises when these actors commit crimes benefiting the corporation or on its behalf. Beyond individual responsibilities, KUHP Baru emphasises the corporation’s duty to implement preventive measures. Failure to establish compliance, oversight or internal controls may negate defences and trigger liability. However, KUHP Baru also allows for measures such as compensation to victims, confiscation of illicit profits, public disclosure of convictions, license revocation and even operational suspension or dissolution in extreme cases. In addition, authorities may impose special controls, including forced takeovers or state supervision, to prevent repeat offenses. Implications for businesses and legal practitioners KUHP Baru signals intensified enforcement against corporate wrongdoing and aligns Indonesia with global trends in corporate accountability. Businesses must strengthen governance, compliance programs and internal controls to mitigate risks. Corporate leadership should foster a culture of legal and ethical compliance supported by robust training and monitoring. Lawyers and inhouse counsels play a critical role in guiding clients through this complex environment, advising on risk management and defence strategies. Regulators face the challenge of enforcing these laws fairly while providing clarity to encourage responsible business conduct. In conclusion, KUHP Baru represents a paradigm shift toward fairness, rehabilitation and corporate accountability. As the effective date approaches, stakeholders must engage deeply with their provisions to ensure compliance and integrity. This transformation does not stand alone. Alongside KUHP Baru, Indonesia is introducing a new criminal procedural law (KUHAP) to address procedural inefficiencies and human rights concerns under the current framework. Together, these reforms mark a modernization of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

This article was published in thejakartapost.com with the title "". Click to read: https://www.thejakartapost.com/opinion/2025/12/22/indonesias-modernized-penal-code-ratification-represents-positive-transformation.html.