Lawyers
group Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) today took the country's top cop to
task over his response to a case involving the wife of Prime Minister
Anwar Ibrahim, calling police involvement in the matter a clear abuse of
power and a waste of public funds.
LFL director Zaid Malek also rubbished the claim of criminal
defamation in the investigation which centred on the reproduction of a
post by Syarul Ema, a local political influencer better known as Ratu
Naga.
Ratu Naga had republished an Instagram post by Benjamin Netanyahu,
which showed Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail attending a session for the
spouses of heads of states which included the Israeli leader's wife,
Sara Netanyahu.
"The picture was uploaded by the Israeli PM, his wife and Wan Azizah herself in their Instagram account.
"There is no element of criminal defamation or any other offence
arising from subsequent displays of the picture, as allegedly done by
Syarul Ema," said Zaid.
Ratu Naga was called in for questioning at the Bukit Aman police headquarters in Kuala Lumpur yesterday.
Zaid said if Wan Azizah was aggrieved by the matter, she was free to file a defamation suit in the civil courts.
"The PM’s wife does not hold any special status; she has the same
rights as any other citizen. Article 8 of the Federal Constitution
promises equality of all before the law, regardless of their status in
society.
"The fact that the full might of the police is being used to clamp
down on social media users for any criticism or disaffection against
those in the government or those married to them, is tyrannical and is
contrary to a healthy democracy," he said.
Zaid also slammed the remark by Inspector-General of Police (IGP)
Razarudin Husain that Ratu Naga had been "uncooperative" when giving her
statement to the police by not answering the questions posed to her.
"Contrary to the claims of the IGP, there was no legal obligation for
Syarul Ema to answer police questions in this misconceived
investigation. The right to remain silent during police interrogation is
the cornerstone of our criminal justice system, codified under Section
112(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
"Section 112(2) clearly states that any person can exercise their
right to remain silent to any questions that may expose them to a
criminal charge. The IGP cannot claim to be ignorant of Section 112(2).
If he truly is, then he is not fit to hold the position of IGP," he
said.
Describing the investigation as "inane and farcical", he compared the
situation to that under the Najib Razak administration which he said
Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders had "vociferously" criticised.
"The PH-led government has with every passing day forgotten their
promises of reform to the public as they now have no qualms in utilising
the same laws that they were once victims to."
Speaking to reporters yesterday, Ratu Naga had described the complaint lodged against her as a "false police report".
"For your information, I did not edit or break any laws, or make any
negative comments on the photograph. I feel the police report was lodged
against the wrong person. PKR should have lodged the report against
Benjamin Netanyahu. He was the one who posted it, not me. And I have
never edited (the picture) at all," she said after being questioned by
Bukit Aman police. - Malaysia Now, 31/10/2023
No comments:
Post a Comment