Tuesday, April 07, 2009

What will the results of these by-elections prove? Nothing really...

What really would the results of these 3 by-elections prove...

Bukit Gantang - well, was it not an Opposition seat - so the question is really whether the people still support the Pakatan Rakyat.

Bukit Selambau - they voted for an independent in GE2008 - and this independent joined PKR. So, these are people that will vote a people's representative irrespective of party affliations. The already know that Pakatan Rakyat governs the State - so maybe they may vote for a 'check and balance' - maybe also to benefit from the goodies that they may enjoy from the Federal Government...

Batang Ai - well the State is controlled by BN. So, maybe they may vote BN again for this by-election. Saving their 'oust the BN vote' for the Sarawak Elections coming soon. The driving force is reap whatever benefits from those in power now...

At the end of the day - really no conclusions can be drawn from the outcome of these 3 by-elections.

Maybe Bukit Gantang - but it very much depends on how BIG the win was compared to GE2008. It may be an indicator of what the people of Perak want - i.e. to be governed by Pakatan Rakyat or the BN - but surely it is but one constituency, and this cannot really be an indicatioon of all in PERAK..


Monday, April 06, 2009

A pre-occupation with RIGHTS is better than with coloured 'i-Kad'..

When you get stopped by the police and Immigration enforcement officers, do they accept these 'i-Kad', or do they still want to see the original passport and/or the NRIC (myKad).

When you go to the government hospitals, is this i-Kad recognized.

Has the law been amended that states that you can use the i-Kad in place of the passports? No, it has not - and until that is done, the migrant workers will have to take along their original passports - if not, they may end up being arrested, detained...and even maybe deported.

Our police, immigration officers, RELA, court .... can arrest and keep detain for months a Malaysian woman - who finally gets released with a child. , what about the poor migrant worker - what will be his/her fate? (see earlier post:-Pregnant Malaysian mum wrongfully detained in Migrant Detention Centre for 11+ months)

Why this 'i-Kad'? The Immigration Deputy DG, says it for convenience.... "...so that they can move around easier without having to carry passports all the time...". The foreign worker is not complaining about the size of the passport - their complaint is that their employer is wrongly keeping their passports. This is where the Immigration Department must be acting on - take these employers to court and charge them. Make it clearly known that it is against the law to keep someone else's pasport.

Employers should bring their domestic maids to the Immigration Department for them to be issued the i-Kad.

Department deputy director-general (control) Sulaiman Keling said some employers were unaware of the need to get i-Kad for their maids.

“But this is for the maid’s welfare so that they can move around easier without having to carry passports all the time,” he said. - Star, 6/4/2009, Immigration: Bring maids along for i-Kad application

So, why 'i-Kad'?....I believe it was to give an opportunity for some people to make some money... after all with 2.1 (or 2.4 million) documented migrants - this is a lots of money. How much do they charge for that i-Kad anyway? Who got the contract?

Well, there is so much pre-occupation and effort with regard this 'i-Kad' for migrant domestic workers - but really should the authorities not be wasting time with this stupid card - and focus on getting some rights for migrant domestic workers.

He said registration for the i-Kad could be done anytime at the nearest state Immigration Department.

“The maid must be present, however, for the registration as we will need to get her thumbprint for the i-Kad. The employer should also bring along two passport-size photos of the maid and her passport,” he said.

Sulaiman said many employers did not bother to register their maids for the i-Kad with the department, saying that they had no time or that it would disturb the maids’ schedule.

“We would love for employers to come forward with their maids,” he said, adding that there was no penalty for not having an i-Kad at present. Star, 6/4/2009, Immigration: Bring maids along for i-Kad application


1 day off per week. Maximum 8-9 hours work per day ( not this 24-hours a day work). Freedom of movement. Freedom to use one's own phones. Proper and separate accomodations to ensure privacy. Respect for one's religious belief and obligations. [Today, whilst the employment law recognizes the domestic worker, many of minimum standards, protections and conditions of work that protects other workers does not apply to the domestic worker, but today with over 300,000 domestic workers in Malaysia, this must be looked into in a serious way]

And what is this nonsense about the different coloured cards for migrant workers - based on their sectors of work. So, if the employer fumbles or the immigration department fumbles and the worker gets a wrong-coloured card, he may again risk arrest,m detention, deportation... If there is to be i-Kads for Migrant Workers - just give them the same cards, and whatever information about the name of employer, etc could very well be in that card...soon, the Malaysian government may require migrant workers to walk around wearing a big 'YELLOW STAR' on their clothes just like what happened to the Jews during WW II.

The colour-coded i-Kad, introduced last year, is a sophisticated travel document for foreign workers, foreign students and expatriates.

Students were the first to receive their green-coloured cards in 2007.

Domestic maids will be given purple cards, plantation workers red cards with yellow stripes and those in other sectors red cards.

Expatriates get gold-coloured cards and their spouses gold-coloured cards with red stripes. The social visit pass for participants of the “My Second Home” programme is silver in colour. - Star, 6/4/2009, Immigration: Bring maids along for i-Kad application


I really want to know who pays for this i-Kad? The employer? Will the emplooyers be permitted to wrongly deduct the workers wages to recover the cost of this i-Kad, the cost of travel involved, etc...

Already, there is really so little enforcement against employers who deduct almost all expenses involved in getting and employing a foreign migrant worker from the wages of the workers - and this makes it so much cheaper to get a foreign worker compared to a local worker.

The recent for the levy, etc was to compel employers to employ locals rather than foreigners - but alas, the government fails to action on the many employers who just turn around and deduct all their expenses (and maybe more) from the wages of the workers.

The law is clear - You can only deduct from a worker's wages things that are clearly permitted in law - like SOCSO(PERKESO) , EPF(KWSP) , ... you certainly cannot deduct levy paid, other expenses in bringing in a migrant worker..

The law is clear - Every month the worker has to be paid wages. Yes, every single month wages need to be paid.

The law is clear - The maximum amount of deductions is 50% of the workers monthly wages . That means at the very least the worker must receive 50% of his wages. (see earlier post:- Levy, Air Fare,...cannot be deducted from Migrant Worker's wages..it is LAW. )

Sunday, April 05, 2009

Again we be distracted by by-elections...3 of them

Alas, yet again we are distracted by 3 by-elections, and only one is to elect a new Member of Parliament. The other 2 are just to elect a person to the State Assembly.

It is not only the BN ...but also the Pakatan Rakyat that distracts us by focusing our attention on these by-elections. [Look at Malaysiakini - almost all reports are concerning the by-elections...]

We should maybe be focussing on other more important REFORMS that should be happening in Malaysia, and in its States - particularly the Pakatan Rakyat governed states..

Again, like an old record, I ask as to when will we be having Local Council Elections ...when will there be elections at the kampung levels, the Taman levels, ...

When will be electing Penghulus...and SENATORS..

What about the financial crisis...and the loss of employment. What about adequate damages and compensation for workers on fixed-term employment contracts who get retrenched. Certainly the current formula used to calculate lay-off and retrenchment benefits will do no justice to these workers on short-term contracts, and this would also include migrant workers.

What about education for all children - irrespective of the citizenship status..

What about adequate and free healthcare for all...

What about payments by governments to all individual Malaysians to help cope with this economic countries. It happens even in neighbouring Thailand - but alas in Malaysia all monies go to companies...

What about a government policy that compels Banks/Financial Institutions/Etc to allow some lee way for borrowers when it comes to the monthly loan repayments for houses, cars, household items and appliances. It is not right that defaulters during this economic crisis are also dragged to court - have their cars re-possessed, their homes auctioned off, their appliances re-possessed....Why is the government helping individual Malaysians during this 'tough' times...

Penang...oh Penang - let the people choose their Senators...

Senators should be elected...by the rakyat of the States (not just chosen by the State Legislative Assembly) or appointed..

Even if you do not want a election now ....at the very least conduct a referendum to get the peoples' views on who should be a Senator..

Pakatan Rakyat must not be like the BN - appointing Senators...

Return power to the people - let them have a right to choose who should be their Senators...

Shame on you Penang...

News Flash by Penang State Government in Georgetown on Thursday, 2nd April 2009:

Tunku Abdul Aziz dicalonkan sebagai Ahli Dewan Negara

Kerajaan Pulau Pinang akan mengemukakan Naib Pengerusi Kebangsaan Parti DAP Tunku Abdul Aziz Ibrahim dan bekas Pengerusi Pulau Pinang Parti Keadilan Rakyat Dr Mansor Othman dilantik sebagai Ahli Dewan Negara pada sesi Dewan Undangan Negeri yang akan datang.

Kekosongan ini timbul dari tempoh tamat perkhidmatan Dato' Omar bin Hj Faudzar dan Dato' Gooi Hoe Hin pada 30 Mei 2009.

Tunku Abdul Aziz merupakan bekas naib presiden organisasi antarabangsa terkenal Transparency International (TI). Beliau seorang tokoh aktivis Melayu berprofil tinggi dalam bidang kempen ketelusan dan integriti. Beliau dilantik sebagai naib pengerusi parti DAP pada Ogos 2008.


* Penang State Government- DAP Malaysia Website


Saturday, April 04, 2009

UMNO supremacy...the UMNO invention "Malay supremacy' should be rejected by all Malaysians

Propagating the myth that UMNO represents the Malays in Malaysia, the myth that MCA represents the Chinese, and that MIC represents the Indians is necessary for the continued survival of ethnic-politics, and ethnic based political parties.

But reality is that there are other parties that now represent the interest of Malaysians (including Malays, Chinese, Indians, Kadazans, Ibans, Kenyah, Melanaus, Penan, Muruts, etc...).

In fact the the party that represents the majority of Malays may today be the Pakatan Rakyat parties (PKR, PAS, DAP...) - and no more UMNO.

In fact the the party that represents the majority of Chinese may today be the Pakatan Rakyat parties (PKR, PAS, DAP...) - and no more MCA.

In fact the the party that represents the majority of Indians may today be the Pakatan Rakyat parties (PKR, PAS, DAP...) - and no more MIC.

Membership numbers may not be the basis of assessing a party'e stregth. The important question is now many paying members (i.e. members who actively take their money and pay their own subscription) are there in a political party. The minimum act of conscious payment of subscription will be some indication that they still do support the said political party.

In Malaysia, many became members on record because some person wanted to be a branch chairman. Notice how difficult it is to join jcertain political parties and be the member of the branch in your area. Some leaders just do not want 'new' members, who may be potential threats.

Propagating the myth that there is a big Malay majority in Malaysia is another means of continuing to stay in power, and suppressing reforms in the political arena. Note that the number of Malays (according to CIA Factbook, in 2004) is 50.4%. The number of Muslims in 2000 according to the same source is 60%. A recent Malaysian government census in 2005 revealed that there are 57% Muslims. [Remembering that to be a Malay, one needs to be a Muslim]. See earlier post: - Why so bothered about UMNO? It may no longer be the party of the majority of Malays in Malaysia.

Hence, the truth about the composition of Malaysia means that UMNO is really not at all that big - and today may really be representing a very small percentage of Malaysians.

This illumination also justifies MCA's call for the Deputy Chairperson of BN to come from another political party - MCA, maybe. Why should UMNO be allowed to hold on to the No. 1 and No. 2 position in BN, and also the position of the Secretary.

The MCA, an influential partner in Barisan Nasional, today called upon Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to create a post for a Chinese deputy prime minister and a Chinese deputy chairperson of BN.

loke yuen yowAnd the party's deputy secretary-general Loke Yuen Yow said these two posts should be given to the MCA president.

At present both the posts are reserved to the deputy president of Umno, currently Muhyiddin Yassin.

"The creation of a Chinese deputy prime minister's position will not only help to realise the true ideology of a power-sharing administration...

"It will also denote that the government gives importance to the role and contributions made by the Chinese towards the process of nation building," he said in a statement today. Malaysiakini, 3/4/2009,
MCA tells Najib to create a 2nd DPM post
I do not support MCA's call. I believe that maybe there must be elections within the BN, and that as a policy, different parties must preferably hold the post of Chairperson, Deputy Chairperson and Secretary of the BN. With regard to who is to be the Deputy Prime Minister and members of the Cabinet - that should be left to the Prime Minister to decide.

This principle should also be adopted by the Pakatan Rakyat as well.

We must also move away from looking at ethnicity and religion as the main consideration in chosing leaders, and should start looking at capacity and capabilities.

Malaysians have to face the facts - and hence new PM's thrust is on Malaysia and Malaysians, it seems.

Why release 13 from ISA? Mistake..or belief that they have been 'sufficiently punished' - Tell us, Mr PM

In the first no one should be subjected to Detention Without Trial, i.e. arrest and detention under the ISA and other laws that allow for Detention Without Trial. Today, there maybe over thousand persons detained without trial, and under the ISA there were 46 as at December 2008. In fact, as of June 2008 there were 62 - meaning that old PM released 16 during that period, so what is the big deal about Najib releasing only 13. (see Aliran's ISA Watch page)

In his first address to the nation as prime minister, Najib Abdul Razak said the government has freed 13 Internal Security Act (ISA) detainees and lifted the ban on two opposition publications.

MCPX

najib tun razak"I would like to announce that the government has decided with immediate effect to remove the temporary ban on two news publications, release 13 detainees from ISA detention, and conduct a comprehensive review of the Internal Security Act," he said in his first act after taking office today.

"These decisions are timely as we move to enhance the confidence of our citizens in those entrusted with maintaining peace, law and order," he said. - Malaysiakini, 3/4/2008, 13 ISA freed, ban lifted on party organs





So, ALL ISA and Detention Without Trial persons need to be immediately released.. and like Guantanamo Bay, Kamunting Detention Centre and other Detention Without Trial Centres need to be closed down immediately.

REVOKE THE SUSPENSION of Harakah and Suara Keadilan --- mmm...this looks staged. Just a few weeks before for no apparent reason, the suspension is invoked. Was it done so that Najib could revoke it like a 'good guy' new Prime Minister...

There is no need to have any 'comprehensive review of the Internal Security Act' - just repeal the Act, and all other Acts that allow for Detention Without Trial. There are sufficient laws in Malaysia already. Remember that 'planning' or 'even preparing' for the commission of any offence is already a criminal offence in Malaysian law.

Today, the ISA and other Detention Without Trial laws DO NOT allow the questioning of the validity of the reasons for the Detention Order, and that is so very wrong. It means that good Minister can give any 'cock and bull' reason - and it cannot even be reviewed by the court.

Released from ISA - will there be any compensation given to them and their families? Nothing at all, and that is the evil of these Detention Without Trial Laws of Malaysia.

Will the names of those wrongly detained under the ISA and other Detention Without Trial be cleared? Can they now sue the Minister...the Government of Malaysia for defamation...to clear their name? Maybe they should try ...and maybe even seek a Declaration that their detention was wrong...

I take it that the release of persons under Detention Without Trial laws is an ADMISSION by the Government that they were never 'guilty' and their entire Detention was wrong. If not, they would have been charged, tried and found guilty.

I believe that many of these Detention of persons allegedly being a member of JI (Jemaah Islam), KMM, or Darul Islam is all 'bullshit' - more likely these innocent persons were just incarcerated because Malaysia wanted to show the world (not the world but maybe the US under Bush..) that Malaysia was also strong against 'terrorism' - even Islamic terrorist. If it is not so, then charge all those persons in court and prove that they were guilty of some wrong.

If Najib wants to do something good - then release them all immediately and go for the repeal of the ISA and all Detention Without Trial Laws. No need to review...

Why are you releasing 2 from the HINDRAF 5? Did you make a mistake in the 1st place? Do you now feel that the 2 have been 'sufficiently punished' for their wrongs but not the other 3? Explain Mr Home Minister the reasons for your release? Mistake...or because they have been punished enough..tell us. Is this not discrimination against the remaining 3 - unless the release was an admission of a mistake.

It was also very wrong to delay the release - for it seems the decision to release was made earlier, and it was delayed so that it could be announced by new PM when he made his speech. When Mr Home Minister did you decide to release them? Were you ordered by new PM to release them? Tell us....be open and honest..

Immediately after Najib's address, Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar announced the names of the 13 ISA detainees to be freed.

hindraf isa detainees 290808They include two of the Hindraf 5 - V Ganabatirau and R Kenghadharan - both of whom have been incarcerated for 15 months.

The others released are eight members of the Darul Islam movement and three foreigners.

The Home Ministry, as of December last year, said it was holding 46 people under the ISA, the majority of whom belong to militant groups like the Jemaah Islamiah and the Darul Islam movement. - Malaysiakini, 3/4/2008, 13 ISA freed, ban lifted on party organs





Friday, April 03, 2009

Najib is PM ...but does he have the support of the majority of MPs? We will never know...

Well, the people do not matter... and the MPs do not matter - for I do not think that there was even a check with the individual MPs of BN to see if they support the appointment of Mohd Najib Razak as the latest Prime Minister of Malaysia.

It was possibly assumed that all BN MPs want this latest UMNO President to be the new Prime Minister...and that is very wrong. Motions of no confidence with this 'new' Prime Minister which may be tabled later would most likely not see the light of day for one reason or another...and so Malaysia has a new PM today 3/4/2009.

But wait, there are 3 by-elections, in Perak, Kedah and Sarawak - and maybe the results would be the indicator of whether the people of Malaysia (oops...just the voters, I am afraid...) are happy that Mohd Najib Razak is the new PM. [But then, with the amount of 'money politics' going around which even saw 1 of 3 UMNO Deputy Presidential barred from contesting, one wonders about the extend of 'money politics' that will be there in these by-elections...maybe not just 'money politics' but threats, etc...]

The outcome of GE2008 brought fresh life to the hopes of people for change - but alas, the Perak debacle and now the manner of appointment of Mohd Najib Razak may have just 'killed' some of that hope.

The victory of the Pakatan Rakyat in 5 States also opened eyes again with regard to the true nature of Federal-State relationship especially here in the Peninsular. The ability of the Federal Government to control the flow of monies and resources to the individual States is shocking, .....not just the individual States but also the constituencies. But alas, we also saw this in Trengganu when Petronas allegedly withheld full payments to the State government when it was under PAS.

Mohd Najib Razak - he is perceived as being 'above the law'. There may be police reports filed, evidence unearthed, etc - but alas the police and/or the AG do not even want to act on these reports, let alone commence investigations. Altantuya and allegations of corruptions in some arms deals, are just some examples. We recall Bala, who alleged in his 1st SD (that was subsequently revoked by a 2nd SD) that references to Najib were deleted from his statement, and that the prosecution just did not raise any questions that connects Najib to the deceased Mongolian. When someone writes something about Najib and/or his wife, the State commences a criminal action against him/her. Normally, the 'defamed' will take a civil suit based on defamation...The fact that police have clearly 'banned' persons raising the 'Altantuya' matter during election campaigns is also indicative of the problems that we have now in the person of Mohd Najib Razak, new PM of Malaysia.

Mohd Najib Razak is the 1st tainted Prime Minister of Malaysia. The impression propagated is that nobody can do anything against him, even when he was just the Deputy Prime Minister. We are thus heading for some interesting times...and we shall see what happens.

The people who can vote in these 3 by-elections, if they have the courage and principles, can send a message to this new Prime Minister...

Najib Abdul Razak takes the oath as Malaysia's sixth prime minister before the king this morning.

MCPX

Dressed in black baju Melayu, he read his declaration of taking office and oath of secrecy before King Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin at 10.10am in Istana Negara.

pak lah and najib raising the umno flag agm 2009 260309 02"I, Najib Razak, who has been chosen to hold the post of prime minister, swear that I will carry out the responsibilities which I have been entrusted with to the best of my ability," the 55-year-old leader said in front of the king.

"I will be true to Malaysia and will defend and uphold the constitution." - Malaysiakini, 3/4/2009, Najib sworn in as PM

It saddens me that even the Pakatan Rakyat are behaving like the BN, in that the 3 leaders signed the petition on behalf of the 81 MPs from their parties. It should have been a petition signed by all 81 MPs personally - the handing over could have been done by the 3 leaders. Now, we are not 100% sure whether all 81 do support the petition....

Likewise, to prove that he has the support of the majority, Mohd Najib Razak should have been required to show that he had the support of the majority - and this should have been done through personal face-to-face meeting with the Yang Di-Pertuan Agung (or even signed letters from the relevant MPs) - but better still or more properly through a vote in the Dewan Rakyat.

Sadly, also the call for the delay of appointment was not to ensure that Najib had the support of the majority. Why was this not raised?

All 81 Pakatan Rakyat members of parliament have submitted a petition to King Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin to appeal for the postponement of Najib Abdul Razak's appointment as the prime minister.

anwar sodomy trial 141108The petition, which was submitted to the palace yesterday, was signed by Anwar Ibrahim on behalf of PKR, Abdul Hadi Awang for PAS and Lim Kit Siang for DAP.

The Pakatan MPs said the appointment should be put off until an independent commission cleared Najib of any wrongdoings.

The MPs said that Najib should be investigated on claims linking him to the Altantuya murder case.

"Of late, there have been too many scandals associated with the deputy prime minister. For example, he has been linked to a scandal involving commissions in the purchase of Scorpene submarines.

"Even worse, he has been linked with the murder of a Mongolian woman, and the case has been reported in newspapers and magazines around the world.

"Hence, we urge the king to postpone his appointment as prime minister until all these allegations have been cleared by an independent commission," said the MPs in the petition.

They added that the position of the prime minister was the most important in the country and as such, it must be given to someone with unquestionable integrity.- Malaysiakini, 2/4/2009,
81 MPs ask king to put off Najib's appointment


Wednesday, April 01, 2009

Elderly should be those over 55, not 60. Maybe 3 million elderly in Malaysia...??

Finally, the government is shifting its attention to the elderly Malaysians. 1.45 million in 2000, and in 2010, expected to be 2.1 million. If we include those above 55, then the numbers will be even higher, and really the elderly should be defined as those above 55 years of age..not only those above 60, given the fact also that retirement age is still 55 for most Malaysians.

With its ageing population surpassing the two million mark by 2020, Malaysia will have to pay more attention to the needs of this group, says Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Musa Aman.

The number of Malaysians above the age of 60 is widely expected to reach 2.1 million in 11 years, he said, adding the aged population in 2000 was just over 1.45 million.

He said the government was committed to looking after the welfare and to improve the quality of life of its senior citizens.

“This change in demographic will pose challenges to governments in providing them (senior citizens) with suitable health care and social services,” he said when opening the Sabah Senior Citizens Association building in Tanjung Lipat near here yesterday. - Star, 1/4/2009, Population shift poses challenge


For a long time the government's concern seem to be towards the pensioners (pesara) only, who were former public servants (also known as 'government servants' - a term used to, possibly, 'brainwash' public servants into believing that they must be pro UMNO led-BN, that was the government of the day. Now, after Pakatan Rakyat is also beginning to be government in many states - there may be a tendency to just use the correct term being 'public servants' - which also conveys clearly that first loyalty is to the people(rakyat)...not some political party/coalition which wins elections)

What kind of care should be accorded to the elderly :-

* Healthcare - thie should preferably free, and also easily available. [Maybe even need to have mobile medical units, with doctors, who will be able to go to homes of the very elderly (or the elderly who have difficulty moving around) to treat them, or even just give them a medical check-up]

* Food & Board allowances - maybe they should also be given a fixed monthly sum generally, especially those that are not under any pension scheme.

* There must be special travel rates for the elderly - air, sea, road, rail (for taxis too - and the government could subsidize the rest)

Assistance for the elderly must be through a government Ministry - not through the BN political parties.

Recently, I heard that MIC was collecting the data (and/or photocopy of NRIC) of the elderly Indians, apparently because 'they' were going to give the elderly some 'benefits'/allowances - but alas, not all Indian elderly will get recorded, especialloy those that are not in MIC (or have no MIC friend). They may probably be giving the elderly some monies that the government has decided is for them. Maybe, MIC just wants this data for some other reason - maybe Samy Velu wants to share his monies with the elderly to celebrate his recent victory...

But, if it government monies intended for the elderly, will all that is entitled to receive it get it? NO.

Will those who are entitled get ALL that they are entitled to? MAYBE, some may be siphoned into the pockets of the party...

Disbursing any assistance through political parties or 'elected political reps' causes problems. There is that problem of 'corruption', the problem of 'discrimination', the problem that not all intended beneficiaries of what is really a government allocation will recieve what is due. Like the fuel subsidy, moneys/benefits for the people should be disbursed to the people through the relevant government departments & ensure that there are sufficient public announcements on the TV, Radio and print media about these.

Nizar vs Zambry: Has it not now become a case of getting a pro-BN judge?

Many will be thinking that the change of Judges was because the UMNO-led BN wanted to get a Judge that would be more favourable to them - i.e. a judge that will not decide that Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin is still legally the Menteri Besar of Perak.

After all, the number one in the Judiciary, is a former UMNO man- not just an ordinary member but someone that fraternized and/or was known by the top leadership of UMNO. So, anything is possible. The new CJ has also been accused of bribery (based on his own public confession), and also of lying (based on an audio recording that rebuts his denial of saying that he was involved of bribing).

Something is very fishy here ... and I am of the opinion that is best that the matter be transferred back to the court it was, and be heard by Judge Lau Bee Lan. The perception of 'judge choosing/fixing' must be avoided at all cost, especially in this 'highly contreversial' case.

The suit by ousted Perak Menteri Besar Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin against BN's Zambry Abd Kadir will be heard before a new judge tomorrow.

High Court judge Abdul Aziz Abd Rahim will be hearing the matter - starting with a leave application for the proper suit to follow - tomorrow afternoon at 2.30pm in Kuala Lumpur.

The matter was previously before justice Lau Bee Lan. No reasons have been given for the sudden transfer of the case, which was informed to the parties this morning.

Mohd Nizar' suit against Zambry is to determine the legitimate Perak menteri besar.

In the suit filed on Feb 13, Nizar, among others, is seeking a declaration that he is the rightful Perak menteri besar. - Malaysiakini, 1/4/2009,
New judge to hear Nizar vs Zambry

He is also seeking an interpretation of Article 16(6) of the Perak constitution on when can the menteri besar's post be vacated.

In his application, Nizar said Zambry should cite the authority that allowed him to legitimately become the menteri besar.

Nizar is also seeking a declaration that Zambry has no right to be menteri besar at any material time plus an injunction to prevent him or his agents from continuing his task and role as the menteri besar.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Election Commission should just conduct elections fairly. Rejection of PSM logo???

How difficult it is to register a political party in Malaysia? It is very very difficult.

The Socialist party of Malaysia (PSM - Parti Socialis Malaysia) have been trying to register their party since 1998 - and finally after many court battles, they were finally succeeded in being registered by the Resgistrar of Societies (ROS) in August 2008. [Note after GE2008 in March 2008 - and as a result PSM candidates had to contest under the name/logo of other Pakatan Rakyat parties].

One would have expected all their troubles to end - and thereafter the party can finally start its membership drive and get down to party work, etc...

But wait - now we find that Election Commission is preventing their registration as a political party for the purposes of contesting in elections. And the issue is the party logo - the clenched fist. What nonsense...

The Election Commission should merely record the already legally registered Parti Socialis Malaysis (PSM)

They have been using that symbol since day one - and how can one rightly expect them to change their logo now...[Think about it....what would be the effect if UMNO, or DAP, or PAS or BN is suddenly asked to change their logo...]

And why can't PSM use the 'clenched fist'? because “it is morally unsuitable” and “has connotations of violence.”

What about the KERIS that is used by UMNO in its logo, or the 'Rocket' in DAP's logo, and the list can go on and on....

Any reasons whatsoever...any means whatsoever is used by the UMNO-led BN government , and now the Election Commission (whose independence is in question) to ensure that UMNO led-BN government will continue to rule.

The Election Commission have overstepped its 'boundaries' a few times recently:-

- in not accepting the Perak Speaker's information that 3 State Assemblypersons of Perak had resigned (The EC's duty is thereafter to just fix the date for the by-elctions - but alas, the EC did not do this but contradicted the Perak Speaker, and declared that there was no resignation - no vacancy - no by-elections. I doubt if they would have done the same if it was some BN ruled State Assembly speaker)

- in suddenly creating a 'new rule' about not being able to display flags/materials if the said party was not contesting in the by-elctions. It was specifically directed at the Pakatan Rakyat political parties. They said that all BN parties could however do so since BN was legally See earlier post:- Only PAS flag, materials (maybe speakers later) allowed for Bkt Gantang by-elections - so UNJUST

- now this non-sense about PSM (after the ROS has approved their registration)...

Parti Socialis Malaysia (PSM) is concerned that if the Election Commission (EC) does not approve its party logo – a fist – it may not be able to contest in any state election.

Founding member Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj said that the EC, in its letter dated Feb 13, had questioned the PSM logo because “it is morally unsuitable” and “has connotations of violence.”....

....The EC would not be independent in its decision making if it rejects the symbol, Dr Devaraj said.

“They should be consistent in their decision since Umno has a keris symbol and the tiger symbol of an independent contesting in the Bukit Selambau by-election was approved recently,” he said.

Since PSM received approval from the Home Ministry and the ROS last August, it had submitted copies of its registration certificate, party constitution, organisation chart and party logo as required by the EC in order to register as a political party for elections, he said. - Star, 30/3/2009, PSM is still waiting for EC’s approval