DESPITE his arrest last night, social activist Sarajun Hoda Abdul Hassan will continue to speak up on critical issues, but with a better choice of words.
Keeping Malaysians 'under control' - by depriving people the right to speak up their opinions and viewpoints is one of the bad characteristic of our present UMNO-BN government. That is certainly not how a democracy works - in fact, in a democracy, the people must be encouraged and empowered to speak up and express themselves - so that the peoples' representative and the Prime Minister chosen by the MPs know what Malaysians want - and will follow the will of the people and govern it in such a way...
Now, with in this day and age of the Internet and social media, people have the ability to share their views and opinions...with many other people. Why should we just listen to the politicians and political leaders only (who get a lot of media coverage)? People should also be able to give their own opinion and viewpoints ...YES, some of it you may disagree with...and some you may agree with. When someone speaks up, other respond with their own views...and there is 'dialogue'...and new opinions, viewpoints and positions are created...
There has been just too many actions against people speaking up and expressing themselves...This UMNO-BN has made it difficult for people to gather and exchange views (We have that law that prevents 5 or more to gather, and if we want to, then looks like we have to apply for 'Permission' from the government - WHY?). They are acting against people dropping balloons with the word 'Justice', people who share on WhatsApp, FB Groups ...Well, it has had its effect, for now many people in FB groups simply choose to read comments made ...not even pressing 'Like' or making a comment in agreement or disagreement...In fact, the number of people expressing their views seems to have declined... Many people now just tend to share JOKES, For sale items/services, Greetings like 'Good Morning'...Malaysians are MORE - they have their own views and thoughts ...and more should share it...
Since 1998(REFORMASI) ...BERSIH...HINDRAF...HIMPUNAN RUU 355 - an indicator that Malaysians have become Brave again and is willing to RISK arrest and detention, and express their opinions and views collectively. Such Peaceful Assemblies are important to show the government that MANY people share a common viewpoint, opinion or position..
The UMNO-BN government(and maybe even the Opposition government) seem to be scared of people sharing and discussing...They would rather prefer people to stay home and watch TV or EPL(English Premier League football)...They prefer people to come and LISTEN to them...They are afraid of people coming together and talking and acting ...
Sarajon Hoda - well, he was apparently being investigated for some view that he published and shared online ... Well, if the police wanted to investigate the possibility of a crime ...the police could simply send him a letter(summons to appear at the police station for the purpose of investigation....)
BUT, why did they go to his home at night and arrest and take him to the police station, and keep him there for hours and he was finally released passed midnight... Well, in my opinion, it is wrong and MAYBE also just to put more FEAR into people like him and all of us....(I recall, that in 2016, I and 3 other lawyers were informed by letter to appear at the police station, and we certainly turned up - Likewise, I am sure Sarajun Hoda would have done the same...).
The message this UMNO-BN government may have wanted to sent to the people by ...maybe you and I should stop speaking up...or expressing ourselves... SHUT UP - the government knows best? [Or maybe the police were just acting on their own?]
What is your response - Stop speaking ...'I do not want to risk being arrested, detained...charged...' - Well, then the strategy employed by the government succeeded - Government Win People Lose!
Well, Sarajun Hoda is going to continue to SPEAK OUT... The incident seems to have not deterred his will and commitment to uphold the cause of justice without fear or favour...
I will continue to speak out, says activist
DESPITE his arrest last night, social activist Sarajun Hoda Abdul
Hassan will continue to speak up on critical issues, but with a better
choice of words.
The Aliran member and former Bersih deputy chairman was picked up from his house yesterday evening for a Facebook posting he put up in July last year.
He was released just after midnight today after he had his statement recorded at the Dang Wangi district police headquarters.
Speaking to The Malaysian Insight at a restaurant in Klang today,
Sarajun said his “offensive” posting was on the issue of tauliah, where
any speaker on Islam must get the approval of the state religious
department before giving any sermon anywhere.
“Even international Muslim scholars were shunned from any (public) place because they didn’t get the tauliah.
“The tauliah issue is not Islamic. It’s political,” the 61-year-old said.
Sarajun added that he deleted the post three months later on the advice of lawyers and friends.
But by then, a police report was lodged against him in Putrajaya.
“The police came looking for me in November and December last year
but I was overseas, on holiday. I came back on January 12 and police
arrested me yesterday,” he said.
He is being investigated under Section 298 of the Penal Code which
makes it illegal to utter words that could hurt the religious feelings
of another person while Section 233 of the Multimedia Act states it is
an offence to use network services to transmit any communication that is
deemed offensive.
Sarajun said he only posted his opinion on what he felt was happening in the country and what was affecting Malaysians.
“The complaints against me are petty. Their understanding of Islam is
shallow because they don’t read the Quran and reflect on its
interpretation and meaning, he said.
He said Malaysia was in a dire situation in terms of social cohesion, race relations and religious bigots.
“As a Malaysian I should voice out against those who make statements
that are not conducive to the country environment such as the elected
representatives,” Sarajun said.
“I will continue to write, but I will have to rethink my choice of words.”
Sarajun was an activist for 40 years and a member of Aliran Kesedaran Negara (Aliran) which was set up in 1977.
Aliran is Malaysia first multi-ethnic reform movement dedicated to justice, freedom and solidarity.
Listed on the roster of the Economic and Social Council of the United
Nations since 1987, Aliran’s main activity is publishing Aliran
Monthly, a periodical to raise awareness on local human rights issues. –
Malaysian Insight, January 30, 2018.
Well, we need more and more MALAYSIANS TO CONTINUE SPEAKING UP AND ACTING WITHOUT FEAR ...
Thursday March 31, 2016
05:20 PM GMT+8
05:20 PM GMT+8
UPDATED:
March 31, 2016
07:53 PM GMT+8
March 31, 2016
07:53 PM GMT+8
KUALA LUMPUR, March 31 — The three lawyers under investigation for
sedition over their motion calling for the Attorney-General’s
resignation said today the possibility of facing charges for their
action would not stop them from carrying out their duties.
Lawyer Charles Hector Fernandez said that as lawyers, it is their
obligation to uphold the rule of law, even in the face of alleged
intimidation by the authorities.
“We are still committed to upholding the course of justice, no amount
of harassment or intimidation will stop us because ultimately, our
position is that as lawyer and a member of the Bar, we have a right and
also a duty, and an obligation, to uphold the course of justice and
bring about reforms to the course of justice.
“It’s not just the obligation of lawyers but of each Malaysian to
improve things,” he said outside the Bukit Aman police headquarters
after he and his two colleagues gave their statements for the sedition
investigation.
Lawyer R. Shanmugam added that the trio did no wrong in calling for AG
Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali’s resignation as anyone holding public office
has a right to be scrutinised by the public.
“No public officer is so infallible that he cannot be questioned. We as
lawyers have a right to scrutinise the conduct of any public officer,”
he said.
Lawyer Francis Pereira pointed out they were merely carrying out their
statutory rights as lawyers, adding that the Malaysian Bar annual
general meeting (AGM) where the motion was proposed was held behind
closed doors.
“To the extent of law, we want to emphasise that it was a closed-door
meeting and the act of calling and asking what happened is bad and
unnecessary.
“Irrespective of whatever the police report said in regards to the
motion, this is quite uncalled for certainly the Bar isn’t intimidated
and we’ll carry on,” he said.
Former Malaysian Bar president Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan, who was also
present, claimed the “unprecedented” investigation suggested panic
within Putrajaya, and that such action was unnecessary if the people in
power did not do anything that merited criticism.
She added that the authorities were disrespecting the statutory rights
of the Malaysian Bar by pursuing a sedition investigation over a motion
made behind closed doors.
“They think they can barge into our territory and tell us what to do. It’s our home in a sense,” she said.
Malaysian Bar vice-president George Varughese was confident, however,
that the police will find no cause to charge the three lawyers after
their questioning today.
But Ambiga insisted that the authorities’ move to investigate members
of the Bar over the motion was an act of intimidation with a knock-on
effect on others.
“For me even the questioning is wrong because it is an attempt at
intimidating other organisations like human rights organisations; they
might think twice because action can be taken,” she said.
About 20 lawyers and activists gathered outside the federal police
headquarters today in solidarity with the trio, with some holding up
signs that read “#RespectMyAGM,” punning the #RespectmyPM hashtag from
several weeks ago.
Others present included Bersih 2.0 chief Maria Chin Abdullah, PKR’s N.
Surendran, DAP’s Gobind Singh Deo, civil liberties lawyer Syahredzan
Johan and Lawyers for Liberties’ Eric Paulsen.
The contentious motion at the Malaysian Bar’s AGM called on Apandi to
resign as AG over his decisions in cases involving state investment firm
1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), former 1MDB unit SRC International,
and the transfer of RM2.6 billion into the prime minister’s personal
accounts.
Apandi told a press conference on January 26 that he found that Prime
Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak did not commit any criminal offence in
the cases of SRC International and the RM2.6 billion transfer, which he
said was a donation from the Saudi royalty. - Malay Mail,31/3/2016
Earlier related post:-
1 comment:
Tafsiran Kehakiman, Konstruksi Perlembagaan dan Kerajaan Berperlembagaan
Kerajaan Berperlembagaan bukan hanya bermakna kerajaan yang menurut terma perlembagaan. Ia bermakna kerajaan yang menurut peraturan dan ini berlawanan dengan kerajaan arbitrari; kerajaan yang dibatasi oleh terma perlembagaan. Justifikasi perlembagaan ialah mengehadkan kerajaan dan memerlukan mereka yang mentadbir mematuhi undang-undang dan peraturan.
Perlembagaan menetapkan had kuasa institusi yang ditubuhkannya dan dimaktubkan bahawasenya tanggungjawab dan tugas badan kehakiman untuk menentukan sama ada tindakan itu melanggar had-had tersebut.
Kes-kes perlembagaan banyak negara demokratik merujuk kepada keputusan John Marshall, Ketua Hakim Negara Amerika Syarikat dalam tahun 1803 dalam Mahkamah Agung dalam kes Marbury v Madison (I Cranch 137).
Post a Comment