Thursday, June 22, 2023

PM Anwar Ibrahim and Malaysia needs to ensure justice be done to documented migrant worker Sabri, who was wrongly convicted, imprisoned and WHIPPED for being illegally in Malaysia(28 Groups)

 

28 Group Media Statement – 22/6/2023(Anniversary of a migrant being whipped wrongly)

PM Anwar Ibrahim and Malaysia needs to ensure justice be done to documented migrant worker Sabri, who was wrongly convicted, imprisoned and WHIPPED for being illegally in Malaysia.

We, the 28 undersigned groups, the trade unions, organizations and we call on Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and the Malaysian government to ensure that justice is done in the Sabri Umar case, the documented Indonesian migrant worker who was wrongly charged and convicted for being in Malaysia illegally in Malaysia. 

 


On 23/6/2022, one year ago, documented Indonesian migrant worker Sabri Umar, was wrongfully and illegally whipped 5 times at Malaysia’s Tawau Prison on 23/6/2022. Sabri Umar, who had been working legally in Malaysia for about 7 years, suffered a GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE when he was wrongly charged, convicted and sentenced to 11 months in prison and 5 strokes of whipping for being illegally in Malaysia on19/4/2022 by the Sessions Court.

When the police arrested Sabri at his workplace, the employer handed his valid passport to the police, which should have been clear evidence that he was a legal worker in Malaysia.

The Deputy Public Prosecutor who charged him in court had Sabri’s passport/s, which also had the Immigration Department’s endorsement of his still valid work permit. There was no reason why he he was even charged for being illegally in Malaysia.

The Immigration Department keeps record of entry, and also issues work permits – but then, it is a mystery why the Immigration Department submitted a document stating that there was no records on Sabri. This document, which was also tendered in court by the prosecution, would have confused the court.

It was the employer’s action of making a police report of an alleged sexual assault that cause Sabri to be arrested on 5/4/2022. It is disappointing that the Employer, one Fu Yee Corporation, who ought to be aware that Sabri was indeed a legal migrant worker in Malaysia failed to inform the courts and/or other authorities that Sabri was wrongfully convicted and sentenced for being illegally in Malaysia. An employer’s obligation to a migrant worker is until the worker is safely back in his country of origin.

The Injustice Was Highlighted by the Union and Civil Society

It was only because of Sabri’s Union, the Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union (STIEU), that finally moved Human Rights Defenders, Civil Society and Trade Unions to highlight this gross injustice through various actions including Joint Statements, amongst others, by 46 groups on 19/7/2022 entitled Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard. The statement was reported by media.

On 22/7/2022, the High Court called up the case for Revision, and Sabri was finally acquitted.

On release, Sabri had to get a Special Pass to remain in Malaysia to pursue justice, but alas the Immigration Department only gave him a 2-weeks Pass, not the usual 1-month Pass and for the reason for Sabri to make arrangement to leave Malaysia. This happened twice, and appeals were made to the Home Minister but to date Sabri is yet to get the decision on his appeals. Hopefully the current Home Minister will finally make a decision.

In fear of being repatriated forcefully back to Indonesia, Sabri filed a High Court case to get a court order that will allow him to stay legally in Malaysia until he will be able to complete his quest of justice. Unfortunately, the High Court denied his application, and he then had to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Sabri, subjected to ongoing harassment and threats from various quarters have now returned to Indonesia, hopefully temporarily. He was also in fear of being arrested again, imprisoned and whipped again.

National Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM)

On 10/8/2022, 47 parties including Sabri filed a Petition/Complaint to SUHAKAM urging also a Public Inquiry but sadly SUHAKAM came back and said that they will not not inquire into any complaint relating to any allegation of the infringement of human rights which- (a) is the subject matter of any proceedings pending in any court, including any appeals; or (b) has been finally determined by any court.’. This possibly was because he had a case for wrongful dismissal at the Industrial Court, but previously SUHAKAM despite there being a case in court had decided to hold a public inquiry in an enforced disappearance matter. We hope that SUHAKAM reconsider and inquire into this matter.

Malaysian Parliament

The matter was also brought to Parliament and the Malaysian Parliamentary Special Select Committee On Fundamental Liberty And Constitutional Rights on 16/8/2022, whereby a Joint Statement was also issued on that day entitled  ‘Call On Malaysian Parliamentary Special Select Committee To Ensure That Migrant Worker Sabri Umar’s Pursuit For Justice Is Not Impeded By Deportation And Other Means.’. Sadly, Parliament too failed to do anything till now, and we hope that this new Parliament will act.

Home Minister Yet To Decide on Sabri’s Appeal

The Home Minister has yet to respond to Sabri’s 2 appeals against the decisions of the Immigration Department to date.

What good is a right and a clear procedure in the law, if the Minister simply does not respond to appeals. Without the Minister’s decision on appeal, Sabri cannot use his right to take the matter up for Judicial Review in the High Court, if still dissatisfied with the Minister’s decision.

The failure of the State, the Parliament and even the National Human Rights Institution to do the needful to ensure justice in Sabri’s case is appalling. What use is laws that provides procedures for victims seeking justice if the Minister just ignores appeals in accordance to law.

Will PM Anwar do the needful to ensure justice be done?

Malaysia now has a new Prime Minister since November 2022, and we call on the Prime Minister and the government of Malaysia to do the needful to ensure justice is done in the Sabri Umar’s case.

The world is watching, to see if Malaysia is also against violation of rights of Sabri and other migrant workers, who reasonably have contributed much to the economy of Malaysia.  

A government committed to human rights and justice, and would ensure that all migrant workers whose rights are violated will find redress in Malaysia. The avenues available to these victims, when rights are violated in Malaysia are in Malaysia – the cannot claim justice in their countries of origin, unless Malaysia creates the possibility by giving other countries jurisdiction, or creating mechanisms in Malaysian embassies in these countries from where migrant workers come from.

The failure of Malaysia to ensure justice be done in cases involving rights violations of migrant workers and foreign nationals in Malaysia, would inadvertently encourage exploitation and rights violations, or even trafficking in Malaysia. The perpetrator will be emboldened to violate other migrants in the future, knowing that they get off scot free.

Royal Commission to look into Sabri’s and other Migrant victims of rights violations

We call on Malaysia to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry and look into the case of Sabri and other rights violations that may have befallen many other migrant workers.

Policy Change - No repatriation until confirmation of no outstanding claims/cases

The current position of Malaysia seems to be the speedy repatriation of migrant workers when their employment in Malaysia, irrespective of the fact that these migrant workers may have outstanding claims of worker or human rights violations against their immediate past employers and others.

This policy must change, and there must be NO repatriation of migrant workers or foreign nationals until the Minister of Human Resources determine that there are no outstanding or pending employment related claims against employers. The Home Minister must also determine that there is no outstanding claims against others, or that the migrant worker is not a needed witness in any other cases. The rights of migrant workers must also be protected by Malaysia – including the right to seek justice, including compensations.

Sabri victim of Malaysian Public Officers Actions or Negligence

Noting that in the Sabri’s case, that his claims arise also by reason of failings of public officers whose actions/omissions or negligence caused him to suffer loss of liberty from 5/4/2022 until 22/7/2022, and suffering by reason being whipped 5 times, it is only right that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Malaysia not only look into this matter, but also consider apologizing and compensating Sabri justly. Action must also be taken against the perpetrators.

Therefore, we call on Malaysia’s new Prime Minister, on behalf of Malaysia, to forthwith tender an apology to Sabri bin Umar, a migrant worker from Indonesia, Malaysia’s neighbor and fellow ASEAN Member State. A compensation would also be just.

We reiterate out call that Malaysia considers a Royal Commission of Inquiry to look into this matter, noting that Malaysia depends highly on migrant workers, and Malaysia needs to defend and protect the rights of these foreign workers.

Malaysia, being a member to the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) for the term 2022-2024, must set an example of a State that actively promotes and defends human rights of all, even migrant workers and foreign nationals in Malaysia.

Charles Hector

Apolinar Z. Tolentino, Jr

 

For and on behalf the following 28 groups

ALIRAN

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Building and Wood Workers International (BWI) Asia Pacific

WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)

Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha(MASUM), India

Black Women for Wages for Housework

Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)

Global Women’s Strike

Haiti Action Committee

International Women's Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW AP)

Japan Innocence and Death Penalty Information Center

Labour Law Reform Coalition, Malaysia

Legal Action for Women, UK

Migrant Care, Indonesia

Network of Action For Migrants in Malaysia(NAMM)

North South Initiative, Malaysia

Payday Men’s Network (UK-US)

Persatuan Komuniti Prihatin Selangor & Kuala Lumpur

Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor(PSWS), Malaysia

Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), India

Sabah Plantation Industry Employees Union (SPIEU)

Sabah Timber Industry Employees Union to Union (STIEU)

Safety and Rights Society (SRS), Bangladesh

Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)

Tenaganita, Malaysia

Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy

Union of Forestry Employees Sarawak (UFES)

Women of Color-Global Women’s Strike, US/UK

 

See earlier posts

Migrant Worker WHIPPED before High Court heard and decided on Appeal against conviction/sentence? Unjust? Contempt?

SUHAKAM Must Reconsider, just like in 2018, the decision to stop investigation and not hold Public Inquiry on the case of Sabri, the wrongfully detained, convicted, sentenced and whipped documented migrant worker(38 Groups)

SUHAKAM lost its teeth? No decision yet on wrongly detained/whipped Sabri's on whether a Public Inquiry (reqested by 47 Groups) will be held? see SUHAKAM Petition

Call On Malaysian Parliamentary Special Select Committee To Ensure That Migrant Worker Sabri Umar’s Pursuit For Justice Is Not Impeded By Deportation And Other Means.-- Rights And Liberties In Law Is Meaningless, If Victims Are Deterred From Using Available Avenues In Malaysia - 25 Groups, 16/8/2022

Sabri Umar's quest for justice continues to be hamperred as Immigration Department once again gives a 2-weeks Special Pass?

Sabri, Migrant Worker Wrongfully Whipped Before Appeal Heard - Statement of 45 Groups- 19/7/2022

Do not send recently acquitted wrongly convicted migrant worker out of Malaysia until he exercises his rights in Malaysian Courts and other avenues of justice - No attempts of ‘cover-up’ or preventing access of justice(19 Gps) - 24/7/2022

Malaysia wanting Sabri to leave Malaysia and not remain in Malaysia to pursue his rights against police and government agencies appaling - 29 Group Statement 4/8/2022

 Whipping must be abolished - it is inhumane, it is torture,...34,923 poor migrants whipped (2002-2008)



Image from NST,24/11/2014 - https://www.nst.com.my/news/2015/09/govt-wants-gazette-museum-heritage-site

 

Monday, June 19, 2023

Time to end the culture of impunity at MACC(Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy)

See also

Death in POLICE CUSTODY - we need the Coroner's Report 'confirming' police did not KILL?

 

Bilingual statement 中文请看下方

Press statement by Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy on 17 June 2023 in Petaling Jaya

 

Time to end the culture of impunity at MACC

 

As another death has occurred under the custody of Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy condemns the third custodial death case at the MACC.

 

We are gravely disappointed that there is still a lack of meaningful reform after the death of Teh Beng Hock under MACC and would like to emphasize the importance of the safeguards and rights of the detainees.

 

The victim was arrested by MACC and believed to be a suspect that was involved in illegal mining in the state of Pahang. According to reports, the victim was sent to Putrajaya hospital by MACC when he was found to be feeling ill. However, according to the chief commissioner of MACC Azam Baki, the victim passed away while receiving treatment in the hospital.

 

Firstly, we strongly believe that the MACC chief is not in a legal position to attempt to give an explanation to the incident or hastily conclude the cause of death; it should have been the duty of the police and Coroner's court to establish the truth behind the case to ensure full transparency.

 

Most of all, as the chief of MACC, any explanation from Azam Baki on a death that happened under his supervision should not be taken as conclusive evidence in the name of impartiality. Echoing the views of Lawyers for Liberty, we therefore form the conclusion that the MACC chief had "no business rushing into conclusions or explaining the cause of death".

 

Secondly, whenever a death in custody occurs, we also notice that enforcement officials have the tendency to push the 'responsibility' to the hospital. The language that Azam Baki has employed - where MACC officials first found the victim to be unwell and subsequently passed away in hospital - is too similar in the numerous deaths that occurred under police custody. The causal explanation where the detainee has passed away while receiving treatment does not do justice to the family and would cause the public to lose confidence in MACC.

 

Given that there were two custodial death cases at MACC in the past 14 years – Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sarbani – and the conclusion of the court of appeal that there was a pre-fall injury on the neck of Teoh and one or more unknown persons caused his death, the police must conduct a thorough investigation on the new custodial death case, including from the angle of tortures leading to death. The police must not be misled by Azam Baki that the decreased died of natural sickness.

 

For the public to continue having faith in MACC, the investigations must be impartial and transparent to uncover the truth behind. Justice must also be done where firm action needs to be taken if there was foul play involved behind the latest death under MACC supervision.

 

While MACC has recently shown to be fearless in performing its anti-corruption duty where actions have been taken even against a former Prime Minister, MACC still falls behind in observing and respecting the rights of detainees. We are shocked to hear from MACC deputy director Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin that the right to legal representation does not apply to those that were summoned by MACC as witnesses.

 

Lest we forget, this is the same excuse that was employed by the officials of MACC previously when they refused Teon Beng Hock's request for legal representation. The tragic death of Teoh Ben Hock should be a lesson and opportunity for MACC to revise its SOP and ensure the rights of legal representation are observed, to protect both the detainee and the public faith towards MACC. Even after 14 years, MACC has still refused to acknowledge nevermind reform this practice which contravenes with the Federal Constitution.

 

We demand the PH-led unity government to seriously consider reforming the MACC and ensure its anti-corruption crusade does not run afoul with human rights principles. The right to legal representation and freedom of torture must be guaranteed, officers violating the rights of detainees must be brought to justice.

 

More urgently, justice must be done and seen to be done; the police must investigate the truth behind the latest death in custody under MACC and actions must be taken if there was foul play behind the incident.

 

The culture of impunity of MACC can only be eliminated when the government takes bold action on previous custodial deaths cases at MACC, including Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sabarni, and prosecute the related officers in accordance with the law.

 

Ng Yap Hwa

Chairperson

Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy

 

Media enqury : 0111-0664526

--------------------------------------------------------------

 

赵明福民主基金会文告,2023年6月17日于八打灵再也发出。

 

终止反贪会免责文化 追究扣留所死亡责任

 

针对反贪委员会再有被扣留者的死亡案件,赵明福民主基金会谴责反贪委员会再次罔顾被扣留者基本人权。

 

根据报导,该名死者因涉及采矿活动的洗钱案,而被反贪会逮捕。反贪会首席专员阿占巴基指死者因身体不适,在医生接受治疗时死亡。我们认为,阿占巴基不应尝试解释死者的死因,并暗示死者自然病故于医院。

 

有鉴于反贪委员会曾经发生两宗命案 – 赵明福和阿末沙巴尼 – 及赵明福坠楼前颈部有伤口,警方应该全面调查涉及反贪会的新一宗被扣留者命案,包括死者或许被刑求致死的可能性,而非被反贪会引导往病故的方向调查。

 

过去的记录显示,反贪会不曾对付涉及被扣留者死亡的调查官,这种放任侵权调查官继续参与执法行动的做法,或导致扣留所命案重演。若政府欲重拾人民对反贪会的信心,政府必须展开公正和透明的调查,找出死亡案件的真相。

 

欲终止反贪会的免责文化,政府必须对滥权者采取严厉的法律行动,也应追究过去涉及赵明福和阿末沙巴尼命案,根据法律逮捕和提控违法者。

 

同时,赵明福民主基金会批评反贪会署理总监旺沙布丁指被反贪会传召的证人没有法律代表权。反贪会剥夺赵明福的法律代表权,长时间单独盘问赵明福至凌晨5点,最终导致赵明福死亡,14年后反贪会高层没从侵犯人权导致悲剧吸取教训和深刻反省。

 

我们呼吁希盟政府坚定改革反贪会的决心,确保反贪会执行反贪任务的同时,绝不能侵犯公民的基本人权。公民的法律代表权和免于酷刑的权利应该被保障,侵犯被扣留者人权的调查官必须受到法律对付。

 

赵明福民主基金会主席

黄业华

 

媒体查询:0111-0664526


--
Teoh Beng Hock Trust for Democracy 赵明福民主基金会
Telephone  :  (+60)111-0664526
Email        : teohbenghocktfd@gmail.com
 
See earlier posts of relevance -

MACC 'Scandal'? MACC sending letter to political parties, employers..'advising' disciplinary action is wrong? 

PM Najib says he has been cleared of corruption claims, but many, including the Bar, may disagree?

MACC kena ambil tindakan sekarang, jangan lewatkan tindakan terhadap ahli politik sehingga selepas PRU

AG? MACC Chief? Public servants preferential treatment? Role of Public Prosecutor? MACC? FAIR TRIAL?

Mah Siew Keong and GERAKAN plans to get MACC to give their candidates 'corruption free' certification is wrong? 

Ehsanuddin(a former UMNO MP) - "repayment of monies = acquittal", loan not corrruption? OR incompetency/abuse of MACC/Prosecution?

Azam Baki (innocent until proven guilty) but suitability to remain MACC chief??? Terence (MACC Panel member) 'quits'

Rais Yatim, Borhan Dolah, Abu Zahar bin Dato’ Nika Ujang - Terminate? Failure of duties in MACC?

Azam Baki - Termination in the Public Interest? Suspension pending Investigation? Result of police, MACC, LHDN investigation? Disciplinary Committee?

Know the misconducts so we can monitor police and public officers - PUBLIC OFFICERS (CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINE) REGULATIONS 1993- full text of this Regulations for your viewing pleasure

MACC under Parliament purview - Already is, and Parliament failed to act? Did Parliament fail/procrastinate in the MACC issue?

Parliament Select Committee on MACC (19th Jan) - Broadcast LIVE, and investigate comprehensively not just Azam Baki but also Borhan, Abu Zahar and Terence Gomez?

PUBLIC OFFICERS (CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINE) REGULATIONS 1993PU(A) 395/1993 - Where is report of actions, offenders and punishment?

Malaysian Anti-Corruption 'problems', 5 check and blance mechanisms, silence of the Parliamentarians' Special Committee on Corruption? 

Hiding identity using others' share trading account, bank account? The Azam Baki case raises concerns

 Did the SC just say OK for others to 'secretly' buy shares under the name of others when they suggested 'innocence' of Azam Baki?

 

MACC suspect dies in custody

MACC chief Azam Baki says the suspect died at a hospital after feeling ill this morning.

MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki was reported to have confirmed the suspect’s death. (Bernama pic)

PETALING JAYA: A suspect who was being investigated by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has died while in the anti-graft agency’s custody.

Malaysiakini quoted MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki as saying the man in his 50s died while being treated in hospital for an illness.

Stay up-to-date by following FMT's Telegram channel

The suspect had been detained by MACC yesterday, but he fell ill this morning while at the agency’s headquarters in Putrajaya.

“The man is among three suspects who were detained last night in relation to a money laundering case linked to mining activities.

“This morning, our officers noticed that the man was unwell and promptly took him to the hospital. He died at the hospital while receiving treatment,” Azam said.

The MACC chief said the graft-busters will fully cooperate with the police as they probe the matter.

MACC officers involved in the probe will give their statements to the police soon, he added.

Earlier today, MACC reportedly arrested three people on suspicion of being involved in illegal mining in Raub, Pahang, and money laundering involving some RM1.8 million.

The three suspects were said to have included a mining machine operator and a civil servant. - FMT, 15/6/2023

 

‘Most critical’ to reform MACC, Bar president tells govt

Karen Cheah says the death of a MACC detainee yesterday has reminded many about Teoh Beng Hock’s death in 2009.

Malaysian Bar president Karen Cheah said the procedure of appointing the MACC chief commissioner could be revamped.

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is the institution most in need of immediate reforms, says Malaysian Bar president Karen Cheah.

Her comments come after a suspect being investigated by MACC fell ill and died while in custody yesterday. The man in his 50s purportedly died at a hospital while being treated for an illness.

Cheah said this was not the first time that a detainee had died under MACC’s custody, citing the case of Teoh Beng Hock, adding that “everybody is reminded about that incident because of this recent case”.

“I think the time is now ripe for us to seriously look into reforming MACC. Obviously, there are some things that require improvement.

“We have a government pushing for good governance and institutional reforms, and MACC should be one of the most critical institutions to be reformed immediately,” she said.

Cheah was speaking to reporters after officiating the launch of the newly updated “The Police and Your Basic Rights” booklet, more popularly known as the “Red Book”.

Teoh, who was an aide to a then Selangor executive councillor, was found dead on the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam on July 16, 2009, hours after he had gone to the Selangor MACC’s headquarters on the 14th floor for questioning.

Cheah said reforms to MACC must be aimed at ensuring the anti-graft agency is accountable, transparent and free from external influence.

“Perhaps, the (procedure in the) appointment of the (MACC chief) commissioner has to be revamped.” - FMT< 16/6/2023

 

Friday, June 16, 2023

Sedition investigation against lawyers over motion - A Memory from the Past

 


Sedition investigation against lawyers over motion

The Melaka-Johor Diocese Catholic Lawyers Guild supports and prays for the well-being of Charles Hector, Francis Pereira 
and R. Shanmugam, the lawyers who proposed the motion for the resignation of Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohamed 
Apandi Ali. S Jeyakumar, the chairman of the guild said in statement released on March 30.


Apr 15, 2016

MELAKA: The Melaka-Johor Diocese Catholic Lawyers Guild supports and prays for the well-being of Charles Hector, Francis Pereira and R. Shanmugam, the lawyers who proposed the motion for the resignation of Attorney-General Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali. S Jeyakumar, the chairman of the guild said in statement released on March 30.

The motion, which was passed by a majority vote during the Malaysian Bar’s 70th Annual General Assembly on March 19, resulted in these 3 lawyers being summoned to Bukit Aman on 31st March 2016 to have their statement recorded for investigation on sedition. This is seen as a gross violation of the statutory duty of lawyers under the Legal Profession Act, to move resolutions deemed fit for consideration and approval at the Malaysian Bar AGM, without fear and favour.

“We are also deeply disturbed that the Secretary of the Malaysian Bar, Karen Cheah Yee Lynn, has also been called to have her statement recorded for the same reasons, arising out of the discharge of her statutory duty on behalf of the Malaysian Bar. We are strongly against such intimidatory acts being levelled against lawyers in the discharge of their respective statutory duties.”

Charles Hector confirmed that he had received a letter from the police on the matter at 3.57pm on Tuesday, Mar 29. He added that he was angry about the decision against the movers of the motion.

“I am definitely angry as this was something done in accordance with the law.

“It should not be investigated under the Sedition Act because there is nothing wrong,” said Hector.

“We are still committed to upholding the course of justice without fear or favour. No amount of harassment or intimidation of this kind will actually stop us,” Hector told the media after questioning.

Francis Pereira also confirmed that he had received a letter from Bukit Aman notifying him that he was being investigated under Section 4(1) of the Act in relation to the motion.

He said that the letter, which was sent to his office, called on him to record his statement on March 31 at 2.30pm.

He also confirmed that a similar letter was sent to Shanmugam.

He said that the police had opened the investigation following a police report that was lodged against the motion.

Pereira added that the letter also states that the investigating officer would be ASP Wan Aeidil Wan Abdullah.

“We take the position that our motion is not seditious in any way. This motion was subsequently debated by the Malaysian Bar and has become a resolution of the Malaysian Bar,” he said.

Pereira also stated that the Bar Council president had been notified about the letters.

The motion earlier this month, had also called on the Solicitor General to take on the role of Public Prosecutor in the corruption investigations involving Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, 1MDB, SRC International and the RM2.6bil controversy.

Earlier, Malaysian Bar president Steven Thiru had said that the Bar was not being political, despite passing the motion. He said the motion, along with two proposals touching on the National Security Council Bill and Internet censorship, were not political concerns but rule of law.

“We are pro justice, pro law,” he said. -- The Star, Agencies

https://www.heraldmalaysia.com/news/sedition-investigation-against-lawyers-over-motion/28807/5

Judges appointment -did PM Anwar follow the recommendation of the JAC or not?

Did Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim advice the King on the appointment and/or elevation of judges as per the recommendations of the Judicial Appointments Commission? Or did Anwar not follow it and made HIS OWN decision as to who should be made Judges? That really is the question PM Anwar must answer,,,

The Conference of Rulers today proposed the removal of the prime minister's power to appoint five representatives to the nine-member Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), the body which proposes candidates to be made judges in the superior courts.- Malaysia Now, 30/11/2022

What is Prime Minister Anwar doing about  what the Conference of Malay Rulers recommended - remove the PM power to appoint members of the Judicial Appointments Commission(JAC)?

See also:

Amend Federal Constitution and Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009 to remove Prime Minister’s role in appointment and elevation of judges in Malaysia. PM must disclose whether recent appointments is as per recommendation of the Judicial Appointments Commission or not. (MADPET)  

King presents instruments of appointment to 16 judges

The ceremony at Istana Negara was witnessed by Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat.
Bernama - 13 Jun 2023, 3:35pm


Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah presenting the instrument of appointment to Court of Appeal judge SM Komathy. (Bernama pic)

KUALA LUMPUR: The Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Sultan Abdullah Sultan Ahmad Shah, today presented instruments of appointment to 16 judges at Istana Negara here.

The Raja Permaisuri Agong, Tunku Azizah Aminah Maimunah Iskandariah, was present.

The ceremony began with the presentation of the instrument of appointment to Federal Court judges Abu Bakar Jais and Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil, followed by Court of Appeal judges Azmi Ariffin, Azhahari Kamal Ramli, SM Komathy and Choo Kah Sing.

Ten High Court judges also received their instruments of appointment – Nurulhuda Nur’aini Nor, Norliza Othman, Hasbullah Adam, Shamsulbahri Ibrahim, Roslan Mat Nor, Julia Ibrahim, Arief Emran Arifin, John Lee Ken How, Adlin Abdul Majid and Abazafree Abbas.
The new judges with Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat (centre, sitting) and other senior judges. ((Federal Court chief registrar’s office pic)

Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim, Chief Judge of Malaya Zabidin Diah and Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Abdul Rahman Sebli witnessed the ceremony.

Also present was deputy law and institutional reform minister Ramkarpal Singh. - FMT, 13/6/2023

Thursday, June 15, 2023

Death in POLICE CUSTODY - we need the Coroner's Report 'confirming' police did not KILL?

Now, law says ALL deaths in police custody have to be referred to the Coroner. Coroner then decides cause of death - and whether the death was criminally caused by anyone - including the police, other detainees in the lock-up, or others before the suspect was arrested by the police. Sadly, the Minister FAILS to report the Coroner's decisions - but chooses to  highlight the finding of the special police unit...

Did the police immediately inform the Coroner(Magistrate) of all deaths in police custody? Did the Coroner visit the scene of death and commence 'independent' investigations? YES - the Coroner can decide that inquest is not needed > but tell us WHY so we understand > nobody wants it to be assumed as a 'cover up' to protect suspected police officers...

CORONER's report - Mr Minister...

Minister seem to suggest that the establishment of police's USJKT resulted in a reduction of death in police custody ...ODD. Was it because of COVID? Was it because of CCTV with recording capacity placed in police stations? 

The Minister sadly DID NOT reveal the number of deaths in police custody in 2023...he only told us that 46 dies in police custody in 2021, and 24 in 2022. SUHAKAM's monitoring allegedly indicate that possibly 11 (10 men and 1 women) have died in police custody until May 2023...which means that we risk having a higher number in 2023, compared to 2022. 

All the more important that the CCTV with recording capabilities, body-cams for police officers, etc be speedily put in place....

 

 Media Statement – 15/6/2023

Coroner Need Report ‘Cause Of Death’ Of 24 In Police Custody in 2022, And Not Merely A Police Unit

MADPET (Malaysians against Death Penalty and Torture) and all Malaysians are still waiting for the Coroner’s finding on the about 24 deaths in police custody cases that happened in 2022.

We are pleased that since the Criminal Investigation Unit for Deaths in Custody (USJKT) was established in January last year, the number of deaths in police custody decreased by 48 percent in 2022 or 24 cases, compared to 46 the previous year.(Malaysiakini, 12/6/2023)

We are happy that the Minister announced the findings of the police, being the Criminal Investigation Unit for Deaths in Custody (USJKT) found that only 2 deaths of police custody had criminal elements, whereby one is already in court and the other is still under investigation. BUT what was the findings of the Coroner?(Malaysian Insight/FMT, 12/6/2023)

We trust better the investigation and determination of the Independent Coroner, who is a Magistrate or a Sessions Court Judge, rather than the USJKT, which at the end of the day is still part of the police that is looking at deaths in police custody.

The Coroner’s duty, according to the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code, is to establish the "cause of death" include not only the apparent cause of death as ascertainable by inspection or post-mortem examination of the body of the deceased, but also all matters necessary to enable an opinion to be formed as to the manner in which the deceased came by his death and as to whether his death resulted in any way from, or was accelerated by, any unlawful act or omission on the part of any other person.

We note that the police, other detainees in the same police lock-up or some other before the police arrest could have caused the death in police custody. Death caused by negligence like failure to provide needed healthcare in time, or even deprivation of needed regular medication is also a crime in Malaysia.

With regard to death in custody, Section 334 CPC states that ‘...When any person dies while in the custody of the police or in a psychiatric hospital or prison, the officer who had the custody of that person or was in charge of that psychiatric hospital or prison, as the case may be, shall immediately give intimation of such death to the nearest Magistrate, and the Magistrate or some other Magistrate shall, in the case of a death in the custody of the police, and in other cases may, if he thinks expedient, hold an inquiry into the cause of death….’

The Minister said that “… six cases have been referred to the Coroner's Court, with four of them in the midst of inquest proceedings while the other two are still pending…’

MADPET reiterates that all deaths in custody must according to law be brought to the attention of the Coroner, and it is only the Coroner who decides whether to conduct an inquest or not. The government, the Minister or even the police have no business determining whether an inquest be conducted or not.

The Minister should reveal as to whether inquests by the Coroner have been completed for the all the 24 deaths in custody cases that happened in 2022. It would be best if the findings of the Coroner is speedily revealed.

The Minister should also inform us as to whether there were CCTV recordings in the lock-ups or stations where the death occurred. If not, the Minister should inform us as to when the CCTV with recording capabilities and body-cams on police officers will become a reality. What exactly is the reason for the delay since the Budget for these have been long approved?

MADPET reiterates the call of the Malaysian Bar, vide Resolution adopted in 2022, that a Coroner’s Court Act be enacted, with Session Court Judges as Coroner.

MADPET calls for greater transparency on all deaths in police custody, and that an INQUEST be held for all such deaths for this will help erase the perception that the police caused the deaths.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

Death in police custody cases reduced by 48pct last year
Bernama
Published:  Jun 12, 2023 7:43 PM
⋅
Updated: Jun 13, 2023 8:19 AM

PARLIAMENT | Since the Criminal Investigation Unit for Deaths in Custody (USJKT) was established in January last year, the number of deaths in police custody decreased by 48 percent in 2022 or 24 cases, compared to 46 the previous year.

Deputy Home Minister Shamsul Anuar Nasarah said of all the death cases investigated last year, USJKT found two cases with criminal elements.

One involved a case in Taiping, Perak, which has been charged and is now being tried, while the other case in Kelantan is still being investigated.

In addition, he said six cases have been referred to the Coroner's Court, with four of them in the midst of inquest proceedings while the other two are still pending.

"USJKT will also present the report findings, investigations and developments of each custody death in meetings with Suhakam and EAIC (Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission), held every three months.

"These meetings are aimed at implementing a system of checks and balances functions for the investigation on deaths of individuals in police custody and to improve the management of police detainees."

He said this when briefing Tan Hong Pin (Harapan-Bakri) during the Special Chamber session in the Dewan Rakyat today on steps taken by the home ministry in managing cases of death in police custody.

Shamsul Anuar said that through the establishment of USJKT, various improvements to the standard operating procedures were implemented, including lock-up inspections, closed circuit television monitoring of lock-ups and so forth.

- Bernama - Malaysiakini, 13/6/2023

 

 

48% drop in number of deaths in police custody, MPs told

Deputy home minister Shamsul Anuar Nasarah says there were criminal elements in only two of the 24 cases last year.

Six deaths in custody cases have been referred to the Coroner’s Court with four in the midst of inquest proceedings and two pending.

KUALA LUMPUR: The number of deaths in police custody dropped by 48% to 24 cases last year, compared to 46 in the previous year, after the Criminal Investigation Unit for Deaths in Custody was established, the Dewan Rakyat was told.

Deputy home minister Shamsul Anuar Nasarah said the unit found two cases with criminal elements. One involved a case in Taiping, Perak, which is the subject of a trial, while the other case in Kelantan is still being investigated.

Six cases have been referred to the Coroner’s Court with inquest proceedings being held on four of them, while the other two are still pending.

He said the investigation unit would present its findings, reports of investigations and developments of each custody death in meetings with Suhakam (the human rights commission) and the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission which are held every three months.

“These meetings are aimed at implementing a system of checks and balances for the investigation of deaths of individuals in police custody and to improve the management of police detainees.”

Shamsul was briefing Tan Hong Pin (PH-Bakri) during the Special Chamber session in the Dewan Rakyat today on steps taken by the home ministry in managing cases of death in police custody.

The deputy minister said that through the establishment of USJKT, various improvements to the standard operating procedures were implemented, including lock-up inspections, closed circuit television (CCTV) monitoring of lock-ups and so forth. - FMT, 12/6/2023