SUHAKAM calls for the Peninsular Malaysia Orang Asli(indigenous people) to be inserted in the Constitution as a group entitled to preferential treatment - LONG OVERDUE..

In Malaysian Federal Constitution, there is recognition of ethnic groups considered behind in terms of economics/finances, business achievements,  education, numbers in professions, etc - hence there is a provision for preferential treatment to ensure equity between the many ethnic groups in Malaysia. 

But, one group that was missed out was the Orang Asli(the Indigenous people of Peninsular Malaysia), the earliest residents in Malaysia - there were also generally the most marginalized group and justly ought to have been included as ethnic groups 

As of 2017, the Orang Asli accounted for 0.7% of the population of Peninsular Malaysia. 

18 ethnic subgroups generally classified for official purposes under Negrito, Senoi and Proto-Malay. They numbered 178,197 in 2010 representing a mere 0.6 per cent of the national population (28 million).

It is good that SUHAKAM(Malaysian Human Rights Commission)  has called for Article 153 of the Federal Constitution to be amended to explicitly recognize the Orang Asli as entitled to the same constitutional safeguards and affirmative action measures as other indigenous groups.

Is it time to move away from ethnic based preferential system , in light of PM's Anwar Ibrahim view that it is Unjust for the very rich (being from the identified preferential ethnic groups) benefiting from the benefits provided for these preferred ethnic groups .... Hence, a proposal to move towards a preferential system for the Poor...  

Amend Article 153 to recognise Orang Asli rights, says Suhakam

2 days ago

FMT Reporters

Suhakam says this is essential to ensuring that the rights, identity, and entitlements of the Orang Asli are no longer subject to administrative ambiguity or exclusion.

Suhakam said policy gaps have left indigenous communities vulnerable to land disputes, displacement, and the loss of livelihoods. (Bernama pic)

PETALING JAYA:

 

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) has called for Article 153 of the Federal Constitution to be amended to explicitly recognise the Orang Asli as entitled to the same constitutional safeguards and affirmative action measures as other indigenous groups.

In a statement, Suhakam said such recognition was essential to ensuring that the rights, identity, and entitlements of the Orang Asli were no longer subject to administrative ambiguity or exclusion.

Suhakam said the amendment was also in line with its call to develop and implement a comprehensive national action plan to safeguard the rights of indigenous peoples.

“For decades, these communities have endured systemic neglect, marginalisation, and violations of their fundamental rights, particularly concerning land, identity, and socio-economic inclusion,” said the rights body.

Article 153 of the Federal Constitution ensures that the Malays and natives of East Malaysia have access to “such proportion” of positions in the public service, scholarships, as well as permits and licences for the operation of any trade or business, as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong may deem reasonable.

In its statement, Suhakam also pushed for the creation of an independent national commission on indigenous peoples, as recommended in its National Inquiry into the Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The proposed commission would advise the government on relevant laws and policies, monitor sustainable development on indigenous lands, encourage indigenous participation at all levels, and conduct research on issues affecting their communities.

Suhakam said the commission must comprise mostly indigenous representatives, selected transparently and with community endorsement, to ensure that it truly represents their voices and respects the principle of self-determination.

Suhakam said although the government accepted 17 of its 18 recommendations from the national inquiry, progress had been slow.

Suhakam also called for a full review of the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 and a reform of the Orang Asli development department (Jakoa).

It said Jakoa, currently the main federal agency overseeing Orang Asli affairs, must evolve into a rights-based institution capable of protecting indigenous rights, not just delivering welfare.

Another critical issue highlighted in the statement was a lack of alignment between federal and state policies, particularly in the recognition and protection of ancestral and customary land. Suhakam said policy gaps had left indigenous communities vulnerable to land disputes, displacement, and the loss of livelihoods.

Suhakam said both federal and state governments must uphold their responsibilities as custodians of indigenous land and resources, including enforcing land rights through clear, consistent policies aligned with international standards such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the ILO Convention 169.

“These instruments affirm indigenous peoples’ rights to free, prior, and informed consent, and to preserve their culture, lands, and institutions,” said Suhakam.

Suhakam added that no meaningful reform could happen without the active involvement of indigenous communities and civil society, stressing the necessity of their participation to ensure that any changes are effective and accepted by those directly affected. - FMT, 3/6/2025

Another LRT death - Negligence of Minister of Transport/Government - Deaths that could have been avoided, Anthony Loke??

Anthony Loke must apologize and RESIGN as Minister of Transport for yet another death of a man falling on the LRT track - YES, this is not the 1st case - so, the Minister knew but did nothing or PROCRASTINATED until yet another died...

The announcement comes in response to the death of a Taiwanese man, who is believed to have fallen onto the tracks at the Pusat Bandar Puchong LRT station and was subsequently hit by an oncoming train. The incident occurred at around 12.30pm on June 3.

To protect people from walking and falling onto tracks, and possibly killed by oncoming trains requires safety measures like platform doors - that prevent people from walking close to tracks, and falling or jumping on tracks ...this is a standard safety measure in many countries, that should have long been in place in all LRT and also train stations...

The Minister of Transport is RESPONSIBLE and he failed to ensure this safety measure was in place...WORSE, this is not the first time...in February, another person died  

In February 2025, a visually impaired man died after falling onto the tracks at the Titiwangsa LRT station in Kuala Lumpur and was struck by a train.Similarly, in 2018, a man died at the same Puchong station where the latest incident occurred when he descended onto the tracks and was hit by an oncoming train.

At risk, have been persons of disability..

The Society of the Blind in Malaysia (SBM) in February highlighted that, to date, there have been at least 20 accidents involving visually impaired individuals falling onto rail tracks at Monorail, LRT or KTM stations. 

Ever since assuming office as Minister of Transport in about November 2022, Anthony Loke is fully aware of the problem - so, his FAULT is for speedy implementation of safety measures, and until then other temporary measures to prevent such incidents - maybe a placement of chains/ropes to prevent anyone falling off the tracks, where it is removed when the train arrives to facilitate entry/exit without incident... 

Again after this recent June incident, he again he 'instructs' - this kind of Minister who 'talks' and do not effectively ACT is the kind of Minister Malaysia does not need.

The KLIA aerotrain is still not operational - WHY? We have the needed expertise in KTMB, etc - who could have resolved the problem speedily within weeks...

Another man has died by reason of the Minister's failures - Did he even APOLOGIZE? Will he personally compensate for the loss of life? Will the government take action against the operators of the LRT - will they be prosecuted and jailed? At the very least, the Company, its Directors/Owners should be charged .... 

PUBLIC TRANSPORT - Most towns and rural areas today have no Public Busses running (the most affordable public transport) - and, again Anthony Loke fails in his responsibility - his focus should not just be his State(Negeri Sembilan - Seremban) or the Klang Valley or big West Coast towns - it should be ALL the smaller towns and rural areas where the poorer Malaysians live - who simply cannot afford that expensive Grab charges(if even Grab service is available in these areas) - we need a better Minister of Transport...?????   

 

 

 

After Taiwanese tourist’s death, Loke orders platform doors at LRT stations

the directive is aimed at enhancing passenger safety, especially at older LRT stations that are not yet equipped with such features.

By SINAR DAILY REPORTER

04 Jun 2025 02:40pm

The Transport Ministry has instructed Prasarana Malaysia Berhad to install passenger platform doors, also known as platform screen doors, at all Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations nationwide following the tragic death of a Taiwanese tourist who was fatally struck by a train at the Pusat Bandar Puchong station on Tuesday.

PUTRAJAYA – The Transport Ministry (MOT) has instructed Prasarana Malaysia Berhad to install passenger platform doors, also known as platform screen doors, at all Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations following the tragic death of a Taiwanese tourist who was fatally struck by a train at the Pusat Bandar Puchong station on Tuesday.

Transport Minister Anthony Loke said the directive is aimed at enhancing passenger safety, especially at older LRT stations that are not yet equipped with such features.

He stated that Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) stations already have platform doors that serve as barriers between passengers and the train tracks, only opening once the train has arrived and come to a complete stop.

“Passenger platform doors are already in place at MRT stations, serving as an additional layer of protection before the train arrives.

“However, there are still a number of LRT stations that have yet to be fitted with this safety feature,” he said during a press conference on June 6.

Transport Minister Anthony Loke speaks at a press conference today. Photo by Bernama

The announcement comes in response to the death of a Taiwanese man, who is believed to have fallen onto the tracks at the Pusat Bandar Puchong LRT station and was subsequently hit by an oncoming train.

The incident occurred at around 12.30pm on June 3.

Closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras footage from the station has been obtained and will be handed over to the police, who have been tasked with leading the investigation.

“We understand that it was indeed an accident, but we will leave it to the police to conduct a thorough investigation,” said Loke.

He added that Prasarana would coordinate with the Foreign Ministry (Wisma Putra) to liaise with the victim’s family and assist with the necessary arrangements.

This incident is not isolated. In February 2025, a visually impaired man died after falling onto the tracks at the Titiwangsa LRT station in Kuala Lumpur and was struck by a train.

Similarly, in 2018, a man died at the same Puchong station where the latest incident occurred when he descended onto the tracks and was hit by an oncoming train.

The Society of the Blind in Malaysia (SBM) in February highlighted that, to date, there have been at least 20 accidents involving visually impaired individuals falling onto rail tracks at Monorail, LRT or KTM stations.

These incidents have triggered public concern over safety gaps at certain older LRT stations, with many questioning why crucial features like platform doors remain absent in parts of the Klang Valley’s rail infrastructure.

The installation of platform screen doors is expected to be rolled out progressively, although the ministry has not yet announced a specific timeline for implementation.

As investigations continue, Loke stressed the government’s commitment to improving public transport safety to prevent similar tragedies in the future. - Sinar Daily, 4/6/2025

 

Report on blind man’s tragic death by LRT train sent to Transport Ministry, APAD

Prasarana is taking immediate steps to improve safety at LRT stations, including increasing the number of auxiliary police and operational staff on platforms

Updated 2 months ago · Published on 31 Mar 2025 5:38PM

The company is actively pursuing technological solutions to prevent such accidents from reoccurring - March 31, 2025

AN investigation report regarding the tragic death of a visually impaired man, who was crushed by an LRT train after falling onto the tracks at the Titiwangsa LRT station on February 22, has been submitted to the Ministry of Transport (MOT) and the Land Public Transport Agency (APAD). 

Bernama reported today that Prasarana Malaysia Berhad CEO Mohd Azharuddin Mat Sah confirmed that a special committee had been formed to investigate the incident and to propose recommendations to prevent such accidents from happening again.

He mentioned that Prasarana is taking immediate steps to improve safety at LRT stations, including increasing the number of auxiliary police and operational staff on platforms, particularly at stations commonly used by people with disabilities.

“To address medium-term solutions, we will work closely with the authorities. If possible, we aim to install sensors on platforms that will alert if someone has crossed into dangerous areas,” he said, emphasising that long-term plans include installing automatic platform screen doors (PSD) similar to those used at MRT stations.

The fatal incident has spurred Prasarana to enhance safety measures at stations, particularly for vulnerable groups like those with disabilities. As part of their commitment, the company is actively pursuing technological solutions to prevent such accidents from reoccurring.

On the subject of public transport operations, Mohd Azharuddin shared that 3,730 Prasarana staff, including those working with Rapid KL buses and trains, were on duty to ensure smooth operations during the Aidilfitri holiday. This ensures that people can visit relatives and travel around the city, especially during the festive period.

“The operations are running smoothly today with 3,730 staff members ensuring everything goes as planned. When people start returning to the city after the holidays, we will increase the frequency of buses and trains, just like on regular working days, with over 5,000 staff on hand,” he explained.

When asked about the recent cyber security breach affecting certain computer systems at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) on March 23, Azharuddin assured the public that security remains a top priority for the company, working in close cooperation with the National Cyber Security Agency (NACSA).

“We have received instructions from the Transport Minister Anthony Loke to ensure that our cyber security systems remain at optimal levels,” he added.

Meanwhile, station manager Mohamad Fauzi Abdul Manap, 47, who oversees the KLCC LRT station, shared his personal experience of working during the festive season. Despite the sadness of being away from his family, he expressed his commitment to ensuring the smooth running of operations.

“It's certainly sad not to be able to go back to my family, only seeing pictures of the celebrations on WhatsApp. But we are used to it for the sake of our duty. As a station manager, I have to ensure everything runs smoothly and all equipment functions properly,” he said.

He also highlighted the challenges of working in busy stations like KLCC, Pasar Seni, and Masjid Jamek during the holidays, especially when dealing with foreign visitors who may struggle to navigate the LRT services due to language barriers or unfamiliarity with the system.

“We get a lot of foreign visitors, not all of whom can read the signs or are familiar with how to use the LRT services, which adds to the complexity of managing operations during such a busy period,” Fauzi added. - March 31, 2025 - Vibes

 

GISBH - A SPEEDY Fair Trial where Guilt is Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt needed to prove 'allegations' true and not lies? SPEEDY trial for all in detention in Malaysian prisons?

What happened to the GISBH trials - that will prove that the allegations were TRUE, ...WHY has it not started yet? 

GISBH(Global Ikhwan Services and Business Holdings) was a Malay(Bumiputra) business enterprise with business in Malaysia and many other countries - it could be the biggest most successful Malay business enterprise (which is said to have been developed without government assistance) - and it was the Malaysian government under Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim that 'cracked down' and possibly 'destroyed' it - accounts were frozen, businesses all over the country ended up being shut down (In Temerloh, for instance so many different businesses have ceased operations). How many workers and those involved in these businesses have been affected - 10,000(or 100,000 or more) including families and children.

Additionally, 96 GISBH bank accounts were frozen, and four were closed, involving assets valued at over RM581,000.

All kind of ALLEGATIONS made - but the ODD thing is WHY HAVE THE TRIALS yet to begin - the public is waiting for the trials, to know if all those allegations are really true - or was the 'crackdown' really for a different reason. Remember, any person is PRESUMED INNOCENT until they are accorded a FAIR TRIAL and the Court finds them GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt, and CONVICTS them... [Remember the Prosecution can only charge anyone when they verily believe that they have sufficient evidence to proof guilt beyond reasonable doubt...so, there should be NO DELAY in the commencement of trial - the need to complete investigation is not an acceptable reason for the delay]

Malaysia remembers OPS LALLANG where there were all kind of allegations forwarded by the government to justify the detention - but, now we know it was all baseless ...

Remember MEMALI - again there was all kinds of justification - then the truth showed that the allegation was baseless...

We need the GISBH TRIALS to start - the people need to be convinced that the allegations made by the police and various authorities are TRUE - do not delay the TRIAL - let Justice be done.

ALLEGATIONS include child abuse in children/welfare homes - the fact that one or 2 of the persons in these establishment committed child abuse crimes NO way justifies the making the COMPANY/GISBH guilty of the crimes. If UMNO or PKR members are convicted of crimes, does that make UMNO or PKR guilty of the crimes as well?

Child/Welfare homes - do these not come under the jurisdiction of some Ministry, and is not that Ministry and its officers responsible for law enforcement to ensure all is done in accordance to law? So, was there a FAILURE of government - why no public officers arrested, investigated or charged for the failings in duty - were they 'bribed' to close their eyes to non-compliance of the law? When a report/complaint or the authority becomes suspicious, are they not obligated to speedily investigate and take action on the suspected person/home - odd that the raids were on many homes at the same time? Was the DELAY cause for more victims? Surely, such homes require the needed license/permits to operate?

One other questionable crime - being a member of an organised crime group. When did GISBH become an organised crime group? Was it gazetted as an organised crime group - when? Or is it open to charge anyone as they please without there being a need of any prior gazette/order that such a group is an 'organised crime group' - and this makes it most unjust - and allows for State abuse of power? What crimes did this 'organised crime group' commit - has it already been proven, and if not - proof will be tabled during trial, and so will the list of crimes that makes this an 'organised crime group' is simply unjust...???

They were charged with being members of an organized crime group at a location in Bandar Country Homes, Rawang, between October 2020 and Sept 11, 2024. The charges were made under Section 130V(1) of the Penal Code, which provides for imprisonment of between five and 20 years upon conviction.

It would have been more JUST if they were charged for specific crimes - not a crime so VAGUE as being a member of an 'organized criminal group' for which one does not even know what CRIMES these 'organized criminal group' even committed? How does an accused even defend himself/herself when the charge is so VAGUE > Worse, there is a legal presumption as well - pushing the burden of proving that he/she is not a member of such an 'organized criminal group"? 

130V  Member of an organized criminal group

(1) Whoever is a member of an organized criminal group shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than five years and not more than twenty years. 

(2) Until the contrary is proved, a person shall be presumed to be a member of an organized criminal group where-

(a) such person can be identified as belonging to an organized criminal group; or

(b) such person is found with a scheduled weapon as specified under the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958 [Act 357].

Was there a BAD INTENTION on the part of the State to charge them for this offence, knowing that it is a SOSMA listed offence, which means BAIL can be denied - forcing them to languish in detention until the trial begins and ends...? I looked at cases of persons charged with this offence - but I did not find any case where there was a TRIAL and I could not find any - most cases was about denial of Bail, and cases where the accussed pleaded Guilty - possibly because the delay in commencement of trial and having to languish indefinitely in detention without BAIL may have forced innocent persons to plead guilty just to have some certainty when they can be free after serving whatever sentence - THUS, it makes this a DRACONIAN piece of legislation, that can be easily abused by State. It must be repealed. In the GISBH, all have claimed trial - and the trial is still to start...

With regard to GISBH - one issue was they practiced a deviant Islam - but then the FATWAs against GISBH was just issued - but then there is a Constitutional guaranteed protection against retrospective criminal laws  - no one can be punished for crimes that were not crimes when it was committed. So, it was not a crime if it was done before the FATWA was issued making GISBH a deviant muslim group...

7  Protection against retrospective criminal laws and repeated trials

(1) No person shall be punished for an act or omission which was not punishable by law when it was done or made, and no person shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed.

Was GISBH made a 'organized criminal organization' because of these FATWAs? 

Consequently, on Oct 3, the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, approved the fatwa issued by the state’s Fatwa Committee, declaring that the leaders, followers, workers, or members of GISBH and its network deviated from the true Islamic faith. The same fatwa was issued in Pahang, Perlis, Negeri Sembilan, Sabah, Melaka, Perak, and Penang, followed by a similar decision by the National Council of Islamic Religious Affairs on Nov 14.

What makes GISBH an organised criminal group? 

Since, the crackdown, how many leaders, followers, workers, or members of GISBH and its network have been charged and convicted for being Islamic deviants by the various State Syariah Courts? This is an important issue...

For Justice to be done, we need SPEEDY TRIAL - which should be completed fast, as the accussed (presumed innocent) languish in Detention without BAIL until the trial is over. Don't make DELAYING TRIAL a tactic to 'force' the innocent to plead guilty..

In 2017, statistics suggest that 29.8%(17,663) of those in Malaysian prisons are 'pre-trial/remand prisoners - How long will they have to spend in prison? And, if they are found to be innocent after their trial, a GREAT INJUSTICE. INajib do not have to spend time in prison awaiting trial - but about 17,000 have to? NOT JUST? REFORMS needed.

In mid-2021, about 41.7 percent of persons in Malaysian prisons are yet to be tried, convicted and sentenced, according to World Prison Brief, who obtains information from Malaysian government sources.  40% (or 30,000) innocents, not yet tried and convicted, are in Malaysia’s overcrowded prisons of about 76,336 inmates - A travesty of justice.(MADPET)

IMMEDIATELY  commence the TRIAL of persons who are pre-conviction detainees in Malaysian prison, or alternatively DNAA all of them (as they can all be re-charged once the prosecution and courts are ready to start and complete trials speedily) 

GISBH - Was it an ABUSE OF POWER, for if not, speedily start the trial and prove them in a FAIR TRIAL to be guilty beyond reasonable doubt.. 

see earlier related posts:- 

9/11 GISBH - What is happening? Are the actions in accordance with law? PAS raises concern about unfair targetting of business premises?

Is 'feelings' about GISBH's alleged 'religious deviation' prejudicing the Government and Police in the possibly 'overboard' pre-conviction 'punishments'/actions?

GISBH - SOSMA abuse? Only can be used when one is suspected of SPECIFIC 'security' offences listed? Child and religious exploitation are NOT such 'security offence"? So, what is the offence? Tell us PM,IGP or government..

GISBH – Do Not Impose Pre-Conviction ‘Punishment’, Which May Caused Irreversible Damage to Business and Workers, Based on Allegations or Police’s Suspicions Before the Court Makes A Determination Of Guilt (MADPET)

Repeal AMLA Draconian Provisions - ONLY Court should make ORDERS related to criminal administration of justice - not police, enforcement agency, Minister or prosecution.

GISBH should not be considered an ‘organized criminal group’ like Triads and crime gangs that commit serious offences of violence, murder, etc....???

TEACHER(cum Caretaker), who caned child for littering, etc, UNJUSTLY sentenced to 10 years? If he had nothing to do with GISBH, would his sentence be much lower?

2024 in review: GISBH raids expose dark secrets of alleged child exploitation and Al-Arqam ties

GISB Holdings (GISBH) Sdn Bhd chief executive officer Datuk Nasiruddin Mohd Ali is brought to the Sessions Court in Selayang October 23, 2024. — Bernama pic

Tuesday, 24 Dec 2024 10:27 AM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 24 — Three decades after the teachings of Al-Arqam were declared deviant in 1994, the nation was once again abuzz with controversy following allegations surrounding GISB Holdings Sdn Bhd (GISBH), an organisation reportedly linked to the group.

GISBH, known for its extensive business network comprising restaurants, hotels, clinics, and tahfiz centres, came under scrutiny this year after raids uncovered books associated with Al-Arqam’s teachings. 

Authorities also investigated allegations of exploitation, abuse, and other crimes, based on reports from individuals claiming to be victims.

The controversy surrounding GISBH broke out when the Malaysian Centre for the Study of Deviant Teachings (PUKAS) claimed the company was linked to alleged cult activities, via its Facebook page on Aug 16.

Subsequently, the Perlis Mufti Datuk Dr. Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin raised issues of purported violence and cruelty within the group, urging an investigation and intervention by the authorities.

Based on reports and intelligence, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) launched the first phase of Op Global in early September, conducting raids on 20 charitable homes believed to be linked to GISBH in Selangor and Negeri Sembilan.

Social Welfare Department tape blocks off a gate at the entrance to a GISBH-linked care home after a crackdown by authorities in Subang Jaya September 12, 2024. — AFP pic

 

The coordinated operation, involving multiple enforcement agencies including religious authorities led to the detention of 171 individuals to assist in investigations into cases of child abuse and religious exploitation.

A total of 402 individuals, comprising 201 boys and 201 girls aged between one and 17, were also rescued. Among them were 10 children with disabilities, including autism.

The rescued children were sent to the Police Training Centre (Pulapol) in Kuala Lumpur for health screenings, which revealed that 392 of them showed signs of suspected neglect and abuse, with both physical and emotional harm.

However, GISBH released a statement denying allegations of exploiting children for labour, asserting they would not engage in such activities that violate the law, especially in matters concerning children.

The issue also drew the attention of the King, His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, who ordered the PDRM to conduct an immediate and thorough investigation into allegations of child abuse and mistreatment. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim similarly called for swift action on the case.

The health screening results of the 266 children rescued from GISB Holdings Sdn Bhd (GISBH) in Selangor found that 26.8 per cent are stunted while 6.8 per cent suffer from serious stunting. — AFP pic

The ensuing police investigation led to the remand of numerous individuals to assist in the inquiry, including senior management members, their spouses, several GISBH leaders, and the son of former Al-Arqam leader Ashaari Mohammad.

Additionally, 96 GISBH bank accounts were frozen, and four were closed, involving assets valued at over RM581,000.

Multiple investigation papers were initiated under the Child Act 2001 (Act 611); the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 (Act 792); the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (Act 670); the Penal Code (Act 574), and other applicable laws.

In the fourth phase of Op Global, authorities raided GISBH premises across several states, seizing pamphlets and documents allegedly associated with Al-Arqam teachings contrary to Islamic principles, along with various items linked to superstitious practices.

In a separate operation in Kelantan, authorities raided three houses in Kampung Panji, suspected to be the residences of GISBH’s CEO and his family.

Various Al-Arqam doctrine-based books and documents were discovered buried near a riverbank, with some reportedly burned.

A file photograph shows Al-Arqam material seized from three houses of top GISBH executives, in Kampung Pinji September 21, 2024. — Bernama pic

Consequently, on Oct 3, the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah, approved the fatwa issued by the state’s Fatwa Committee, declaring that the leaders, followers, workers, or members of GISBH and its network deviated from the true Islamic faith.

The same fatwa was issued in Pahang, Perlis, Negeri Sembilan, Sabah, Melaka, Perak, and Penang, followed by a similar decision by the National Council of Islamic Religious Affairs on Nov 14.

By Oct 10, police had initiated 97 investigation papers covering numerous offences, including under Section 130V of the Penal Code, the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001, and the Sexual Offenses Against Children Act 2017.

Other related laws involved the Child Act 2001, Sections 354 and 506 of the Penal Code, the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007, and the Child Care Centre Act 1993.

On Oct 23, GISBH CEO Datuk Nasiruddin Mohd Ali and 21 others were charged in the Selayang Sessions Court under Section 130V (1) of the Penal Code with being members of a criminal syndicate, which carries a prison sentence of between 5 and 20 years upon conviction.

On Dec 23, the Selayang Sessions Court transferred the case to the Shah Alam High Court.

As of the time of writing, 625 victims, ranging in age from two months to 28 years, have been rescued since Op Global began in September.

The police are still carrying out investigations, particularly involving followers and GISBH premises abroad. — Bernama, Malay Mail24 Dec 2024

Poverty - Cultivating Dependency or Empowerment? Anwar - what is the plan to overcome local poverty, and old age poverty? Should we reduce migrant workers?

How do one effectively deal with POVERTY?

WELFARE approach -  Give a person a fish to eat, and continuously give him fishes all the time. 

DEVELOPMENT approach - Teach the person to fish. Thus this method provides the needed skills, for one to escape poverty - and become independent. The original FELDA model did this - the poor and landless were given land, and taught skills so that they could become rubber/oil palm small holders - ultimately out of poverty. The State provided loans/housing with the understanding that the smallholder will ultimately pay back the loan, after his efforts bore fruit and profit. The principle was good, and it protected the DIGNITY of the worker - and led to liberation from poverty.

JUSTICE approach - But, the problem, is that self-empowerment alone is not enough. Knowing how to fish alone is not enough, when the fish in the river starts dying because of pollution caused by some factory upstream illegally discharging waste, some logging activities affecting the river, the building of some dam/land reclamation project that affects the fish in the water. Hence, the need for empowered persons to understand the socio-economic and political factors that may affect his/her livelihood so that he can act to prevent such happenings - to secure his/her livelihood and life..and the live of the community/nation.

Thus, whilst the welfare approach may be the first - to ensure that the poor have sufficient food, shelter, clothing > it cannot stop there but it must move forward UNLESS the State or POLITICIANS simple just want to build a culture of 'DEPENDENCY' - so that the people will always DEPEND on them, and will be unable to act on their own, not yet EMPOWERED to ensure their life and livelihood, and prevent any future destruction of that livelihood. The end of DEPENDENCY - the beginning of informed choices for a BETTER LIFE for oneself and all others.

Many a politician (and even political parties) prefer to cultivate DEPENDENCY - so that people will always believe that without these politician/political party, they will be goners .... so rather than striving for independence, empowerment,... dependency to keep them all 'poor', and believe that they need the politician or party to survive... without whom, they will again be marginalized and suffer.

When Malaysia achieved independence, it is an undeniable fact that many people were 'behind' in terms of education, skills, etc - it is the case in any community/nation, where special attention may be needed to UPLIFT people to a more equitable position...Rather than providing for a social upliftment or empowerment program based on poverty, marginalization, Malaysia took an ethnic-based approach - preferential treatment for Malays and natives of Sabah and Sarawak... unfortunately some groups were missed out like the many Orang Asli communities in Peninsular Malaysia(many of whom were in a far worse condition) - Subsequent governments, to date, have yet to amend the Constitution to include the different Orang Asli communities as a group that ought to be accorded preferential treatment. 

When Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim came into the picture, he identified a serious flaw, in that the very rich from these identified preferred groups were benefiting from this ethnic based solution, and so he took steps to remove the really rich from using/benefiting -   

“We are not reducing or discontinuing subsidies to the people but subsidies such as electricity and Tabung Haji benefited by the rich are not reasonable to be continued,” he[Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim] said. He said he could not understand why there are still people defending subsidies for Malaysia’s rich who are said to make up roughly 20 per cent of income earners and are known colloquially as the T20 — for top 20 percentile demographic group....On May 22, Anwar said the exclusion would further include the T20 group from the subsidy scheme, for the purpose of facilitating the granting of subsidies in a more targeted manner. - Malay Mail, 12/6/2023

In my opinion, Anwar made a GREAT move - and moved towards an option for the POOR and MARGINALIZED, irrespective of ethnicity/religion > so no more will the RICH benefit from the ethnic based preferential system.

BUT, save for subsidies, he failed to address other issues like scholarship, places in educational institute, licenses, contracts, --- will the top rich Malays still be getting scholarship and university places(in Malaysia and overseas) for their children? Anwar's OPTION FOR THE POOR approach is right and we will see if he follows through...

Anwar's WELFARE approach to aid the POOR currently include the RAHMAH scheme, which include direct cash aid to recipients - it is NOT NEW, just a re-branding since Najib was Prime Minister

Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR)  handouts will be distributed in stages from Jan 17 onwards. This is the fourth time that the programme has been renamed since Najib Razak's administration, when it was known as Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia or BR1M. It was rebranded as Bantuan Sara Hidup (BSH) after Pakatan Harapan (PH), led by Dr Mahathir Mohamad, took over the federal administration in 2018, and Bantuan Prihatin Rakyat (BPR) under the Perikatan Nasional government led by Muhyiddin Yassin. The administration of Ismail Sabri Yaakob, which took over from Muhyiddin in 2021, called the handouts Bantuan Keluarga Malaysia (BKM), in line with the Keluarga Malaysia tagline being promoted at the time.

Menu Rahmah Programme have agreed to provide daily meals (either lunch or dinner) at a rate not exceeding RM5 per meal. Usually, the dishes in the Menu Rahmah Programme contain one source of protein either chicken or fish and one type of vegetable. 

One fundamental problem is that it is NOT A RIGHT - for that, we need a LAW that clearly stipulates the RIGHT TO ENTITLEMENT, possibly clearly stating who exactly is entitled, and HOW MUCH is the entitlement - for so long as it is not a RIGHT in law, it all depends on the sitting PM and his/her government, and it can be extinguished anytime. There is also the problem of determining who is entitled to receive it > for Malaysia still do not have a clear mechanism to determine who should be getting it - Does it just rely on self-declared monthly income, without taking into consideration other sources of income - shares/unit trust, lands, other buildings, etc? The RISK is that many who are really entitled may not get it...

The other problem is that AID in fact only is RM100 or RM200 a month - certainly far from enough for any poor person to survive on. It should be sufficient to cover rental, food, transportation and other NEEDED expenditure to survive...at least RM2,000 per month for those who really do not have any income whatsoever.

Now, the scheme helps 8.4 million recipients (or do they mean families?). 

Rather than AID(or Fish), should we not protect the DIGNITY of people like the provision of job/work as done in some countries. What they do is to provide small jobs - like sweeping roads, office cleaning, selling parking tickets,etc - simple jobs within their means.. better jobs with an income, rather than welfare aid..

Malaysia has acknowledged that 8.4 million people need assistance - welfare aid is not a solution - it is better to provide jobs, appropriate to their capacity - Local Government and other governments can do this... After all, one problem in Malaysia is road cleanliness - now, most roads are not swept and maintained. In China, we see many people employed to sweep roads daily -- Rather than giving jobs like cutting grass to contractors, consider giving it to the poor in the towns, ...Malaysia have been removing jobs like tol booth collectors, petrol station attendants (now requiring drivers to fill their own petrol) - bring it back and give it to the local poor... security guards in schools.. better jobs, which preserve dignity, that outright aid..

FOR the elderly poor above 60 years of age, a government PENSION scheme until the pass on... let our OLD FOLKS retire and enjoy the remaining of their life. {As it is, thanks to the 'abuse' of the EPF/KWSP scheme allowing people to withdraw from the 'old age savings' have left many with no money... a poor scheme to provide houses for the poor has caused financial obligation of repaying loans even after they reach 60...

The government must deal with this issue of POVERTY amongst local Malaysians - as cost of living sky rockets, money set aside for 'old age', if any' is clearly not enough...

 

 

 

 

Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) 2024 explained: Are you eligible to claim?

finance

2024-05-03

In support of the B40 community, the Malaysian Government has kickstarted the distribution of phase 2 of the Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) programme. They're increasing the funds by 20%, adding to last year's RM1.26 billion allocation to reach RM1.5 billion. This will benefit 8.4 million Malaysians, who will receive payments ranging from RM100 to RM650, based on their individual needs.

What is Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) programme?

Formerly known as Bantuan Keluarga Malaysia, the Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR) programme, or Rahmah Cash Contribution in English, provides cash assistance to Malaysians from the poor, B40 and M40 individuals, households, and senior citizens. The programme aims to alleviate financial burdens and enhance the well-being of eligible recipients.

Payments are distributed in four phases throughout the year:

• Phase 1: January 2024

• Phase 2: April 2024

• Phase 3: August 2024

• Phase 4: November 2024

These phases ensure that assistance is provided periodically to those in need, contributing to the overall welfare of Malaysian society.

Here’s what you need to know about eligibility and claiming:

Household income range: RM0 – RM2,500

0 child: RM150

1 - 2 child(ren): RM300

3 - 4 children: RM500

5 children and more: RM650

Household income range RM2,501 – RM5,000

0 child: RM100

1 - 2 child(ren): RM200

3 - 4 children: RM250

5 children and more: RM300

Senior citizens living alone (aged 60 and above)

Income range: RM0 – RM5,000: RM150

Single individuals and single OKU (aged 21 to 59)

Income range: RM0 – RM2,500: RM100 ...https://www.touchngo.com.my/blog/eligible-sumbangan-tunai-rahmah-str/

Another name change for govt cash aid programme

This is the fourth time the programme has been renamed since the Najib Razak era.

Staff Writers

January 16, 2023 4:31 PM

People queue to check their eligibility for Bantuan Sara Hidup payments at an Inland Revenue Board office in 2019. Photo: Bernama

The government's cash aid programme has undergone yet another round of rebranding, with Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announcing today that Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah (STR)  handouts will be distributed in stages from Jan 17 onwards. 

This is the fourth time that the programme has been renamed since Najib Razak's administration, when it was known as Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia or BR1M. 

It was rebranded as Bantuan Sara Hidup (BSH) after Pakatan Harapan (PH), led by Dr Mahathir Mohamad, took over the federal administration in 2018, and Bantuan Prihatin Rakyat (BPR) under the Perikatan Nasional government led by Muhyiddin Yassin. 

The administration of Ismail Sabri Yaakob, which took over from Muhyiddin in 2021, called the handouts Bantuan Keluarga Malaysia (BKM), in line with the Keluarga Malaysia tagline being promoted at the time. 

In his announcement today, Anwar, who leads a coalition government comprising PH, Barisan Nasional, Gabungan Parti Sarawak, Gabungan Rakyat Sabah and several other parties, said a total of RM1.67 billion would be disbursed under the STR programme.

Of this, RM1.20 billion will go to some 400 households in payments of RM300 while the rest will be divided between RM100 handouts for 1.2 million single senior citizens and RM100 handouts for 3.5 million single individuals. Malaysia Now, 16/1/2023

 

 

PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT - Did PM Anwar choose Rafizi to be Minister because he was PKR Deputy Chief or because he was qualified to be Minister? Time has come for vetting/approval by Parliament of PM's proposed Ministers?

Choosing Ministers - time for a re-evaluation of how Ministers are chosen, noting that individual Ministers have a lot of power, as contained in Acts of Parliament, which can be exercised without consent of PM or Cabinet, thus, the need to ENSURE that only principled, ethical, suitable and qualified persons are made Ministers and/or Deputy Ministers - Time to introduce laws like PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT, i.e. PM can nominate, but Parliament will vet and approve, before the King appoints.

At present, it is the PM that picks and causes appointment - but it seems, that he alone, picks MAYBE on the basis of whether one is a holder of party position, or by reason of 'deals' with coalition partners, OR .... - END RESULT - RISK of an unsuitable person  becoming a Minister, vested with power that even the PM or Cabinet cannot control. Should we also enact a law, that ensures the need for Cabinet approval before a Minister can exercise his/her power?

Was Rafizi and Nik Nazmi even qualified or suitable to be appointed Ministers - or were they appointed simply because they were Deputy President and Vice President of PKR? 

Note being a leader of a political party does not translate into suitability or qualification to be a Minister... Some good political leaders of parties make bad members of the Cabinet.. Malaysians should demand ONLY Suitable and Qualified persons be made Ministers.

Rafizi and Nik Nazmi, after they lost party elections - they resigned as Ministers - was it a VOTE of loss of confidence in PM Anwar Ibrahim? Or was it just proof of their 'unsuitability' to be even have been appointed as Ministers.

Worse, Rafizi and Nik Nazmi resigned, and went on leave stating their resignation will be after their leave is over? Should Ministers who wanted to resign be responsible enough in completing their work, and preparing 'hand-over' documents so that their replacements could take over easily. Again, is this a sign of irresponsibility and unsuitableness as Ministers. 

Rafizi confirmed that his resignation will take effect on June 17 and that he will be on annual leave until then.... “I have submitted my resignation letter to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, effective July 4, 2025. I will be on leave starting tomorrow until July 3, 2025,” he [Nik Nazmi] said.

You are a Minister of Malaysia, and losing party elections should not mean you forsake your duties/responsibilities as Ministers. If you quit the party in protest, or even stayed in the party but opted to declare loss of confidence in Anwar as PM, it may be OK(as what the BERSATU MPs did), but suddenly abandoning your Ministerial responsibilities is a totally different thing - it is a BETRAYAL of the people of Malaysia.

One must note that some of Anwar's Ministers have been found wanting - thus, the time has come for vetting and approval by Parliament - to ensure Malaysia has suitable and qualified Ministers and Deputy Ministers   (Art. 43A(2)(2) Deputy Ministers shall assist Ministers in the discharge of their duties and functions, and for such purpose shall have all the powers of Ministers.)  

It must be noted that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's choice of Ministers and Deputy Ministers have raised some concern. Whilst previous Prime Ministers; Muhyiddin and Ismail Sabri, chose not to appoint anyone who was facing investigations and trials as Ministers or Deputy Ministers, Anwar, on the other hand, appointed some of them in the 'court cluster' as Ministers/Deputy Ministers.

One may argue that Anwar had NO CHOICE because that may have been a 'condition' for BN joining PH, so that the coalition government could be formed, and Anwar could finally be the Prime Minister... Alternatively, PH would not be able to form the government...

Many were then supportive of PH because of its REFORM agenda and promises - but today, as REFORMS never really came, people's perception, and possibility support, for PH may have declined. 

Now, the fact that you lost PKR elections, and even GE15 elections is not a reason why you are not suitable to be appointed as Minister - the appointment of Saifuddin Nasution as Home Minister is case in point.

But, if you are facing a charge or trial for a criminal offence makes one unsuitable for being appointed Minister, or remaining as Minister..The case in point is Zahid Hamidi, who was appointed Deputy Prime Minister.

The point is made clear in the Federal Constitution itself, whereby Article 33A,(1) Where the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is charged with an offence under any law in the Special Court established under Part XV he shall cease to exercise the functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.  

Naturally, the same principle ought to apply to the Prime Minister, Minister or Deputy Minister - i.e. if they are charged with any offence and facing trial, they should never be appointed as Minister.

Zahid Hamidi, when PM Anwar made him Minister, and Deputy Prime Minister was still facing trial. 

It was only on 4/9/2023, that Zahid Hamidi was granted a DNAA (Discharge Not Amounting To An Acquittal). No problem about appointing Zahid as Minister after he was discharged - meaning facing no more charge, but the appointment when he was charged and facing a trial was wrong - same standards that apply to the King should apply to any of the King appointed Ministers.

That is WHY we need to amend the LAWS requiring APPROVAL of Parliament for all persons that Prime Minister Anwar wants to be appointed as Ministers or Deputy Ministers.

Time for PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT for Malaysia to ensure that only SUITABLE and QUALIFIED persons are made Ministers and Deputy Ministers in Malaysia.  

Such an ACT that requires Parliamentary Approval should also apply to the Public Prosecutor, and all heads of Law Enforcement - police, MACC, ...

A NEEDED REFORM....

Rafizi resigns as Economy Minister

• Neville Timothy Sanders
• Nation
• 28 May 2025
• 9:32 pm

Mohd Rafizi Ramli

KUALA LUMPUR: Economy Minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli, has officially tendered his resignation from the Cabinet to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, citing his recent defeat in the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) party elections as the primary reason for stepping down.

In his Facebook post on Wednesday, Rafizi confirmed that his resignation will take effect on June 17 and that he will be on annual leave until then.

He emphasised that he no longer holds the mandate from his party to represent and implement the people-centric agenda championed by PKR within the government.

“I entered politics to foster a new political culture centred on accountability and the people’s mandate.

“Following my loss in the recent PKR elections, it is only right that I pave the way for new leadership to take my place,” he said.

Rafizi, who is the Pandan MP, also urged the Cabinet to continue with bold reforms introduced under the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), especially in the education sector, despite his departure.

“I would like to confirm that 13MP has been finalised and is ready to be tabled in the next parliamentary session,” he added.

Rafizi, 47, hails from Besut, Terengganu and is an electrical engineering graduate from the University of Leeds, the United Kingdom.

He began his career as a chartered accountant and held senior positions in the private sector before venturing into politics in the late 2000s.

Known for his data-driven approach and policy advocacy, Rafizi gained prominence for his role in pushing for economic reforms and greater transparency in governance.

He served as PKR vice president and was re-elected to Parliament in 2022 after a brief hiatus from active politics.

Rafizi expressed gratitude to the civil service, media, and stakeholders who supported him during his tenure and reaffirmed his belief in the long-term economic restructuring agenda laid out by the Ministry of Economy.

“Our journey towards building a stronger economic structure and achieving high-income nation status is far from over.

“We must remain committed to making difficult but necessary decisions for the benefit of future generations,” he said.

His departure marks a significant shift in the economic leadership of the Unity Government, with speculation mounting over who will succeed him in the pivotal role. - Sarawak Tribune, 28/5/2025

 

After Rafizi, Nik Nazmi resigns as minister following PKR election loss

Minister of Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad said his resignation will take effect on July 4, with him going on leave beginning tomorrow. — Bernama pic

By Malay Mail

Wednesday, 28 May 2025 4:38 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR, May 28 — Following Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli’s resignation as economy minister, Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad has today announced his decision to step down as natural resources and environmental sustainability minister after failing to retain his PKR vice-presidency.

In a statement today, Nik Nazmi said his resignation will take effect on July 4, with him going on leave beginning tomorrow. 

“I have submitted my resignation letter to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, effective July 4, 2025. I will be on leave starting tomorrow until July 3, 2025,” he said.

Nik Nazmi reflected on his tenure, highlighting key reforms achieved under his leadership, including amendments to the Environmental Quality Act 1974, increased transparency in environmental impact assessments, and significant progress in biodiversity protection.

“Malaysia became one of the earliest nations to submit the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plan, which received recognition from United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres,” he noted.

He also cited accomplishments such as the passing of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act and the introduction of the much-needed Tariff Setting Mechanism in the water sector.

Nik Nazmi acknowledged that his Cabinet appointment had been influenced by his position as a PKR vice-president, which he lost in the party’s recent elections.

“Given that I was unable to retain the position, I have decided to resign as minister,” he said.

He expressed gratitude to civil servants, his office team, and stakeholders for their support, adding that he looks forward to resuming his responsibilities as Setiawangsa MP.

Quoting late British MP Tony Benn, Nik Nazmi said, “I am leaving the Cabinet to give more time to politics and public service.”

Rafizi, who lost his bid for re-election as PKR deputy president to Nurul Izzah Anwar, announced his resignation as economy minister earlier today.

The Pandan MP had previously stated his intention to step down if he failed to secure the deputy presidency, citing the importance of Cabinet members holding party leadership positions.

The resignations of Rafizi and Nik Nazmi signal significant shifts in the party’s representation within the federal administration and raise questions about the Cabinet’s future composition. - Malay Mail, 28/5/2025

NO. 33 OF 2011
PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT
[Date of assent: 11th November, 2011.]
[Date of commencement: 14th November, 2011.]

An Act of the Parliament to provide for procedures for parliamentary approval of constitutional and statutory appointments and for connected purposes

1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) Act, 2011.

2. Interpretation
 

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires—

“appointing authority” means any person who, under the Constitution or any other law, is required to make an appointment for which the approval of Parliament is required;

“appointment” includes any re-appointment to the same body, whether or not in the same capacity;

“candidate” means a person who has been proposed or nominated for appointment to a public office;

“Clerk” means the Clerk of the relevant House of Parliament; and “Committee” means the relevant committee of Parliament or such other Committee as the Speaker may, for good reasons, direct.

3. Exercise of powers of appointment
An appointment under the Constitution or any other law for which the approval of Parliament is required shall not be made unless the appointment is approved or deemed to have been approved by Parliament in accordance with this Act.

4. Notification of vetting requirements
Any advertisement inviting applications for nomination for appointment to an office to which this Act applies shall indicate that candidates so nominated shall be required to appear before a committee of Parliament for vetting