Loading...

Monday, March 30, 2009

Election Commission should just conduct elections fairly. Rejection of PSM logo???

How difficult it is to register a political party in Malaysia? It is very very difficult.

The Socialist party of Malaysia (PSM - Parti Socialis Malaysia) have been trying to register their party since 1998 - and finally after many court battles, they were finally succeeded in being registered by the Resgistrar of Societies (ROS) in August 2008. [Note after GE2008 in March 2008 - and as a result PSM candidates had to contest under the name/logo of other Pakatan Rakyat parties].

One would have expected all their troubles to end - and thereafter the party can finally start its membership drive and get down to party work, etc...

But wait - now we find that Election Commission is preventing their registration as a political party for the purposes of contesting in elections. And the issue is the party logo - the clenched fist. What nonsense...

The Election Commission should merely record the already legally registered Parti Socialis Malaysis (PSM)

They have been using that symbol since day one - and how can one rightly expect them to change their logo now...[Think about it....what would be the effect if UMNO, or DAP, or PAS or BN is suddenly asked to change their logo...]

And why can't PSM use the 'clenched fist'? because “it is morally unsuitable” and “has connotations of violence.”

What about the KERIS that is used by UMNO in its logo, or the 'Rocket' in DAP's logo, and the list can go on and on....

Any reasons whatsoever...any means whatsoever is used by the UMNO-led BN government , and now the Election Commission (whose independence is in question) to ensure that UMNO led-BN government will continue to rule.

The Election Commission have overstepped its 'boundaries' a few times recently:-

- in not accepting the Perak Speaker's information that 3 State Assemblypersons of Perak had resigned (The EC's duty is thereafter to just fix the date for the by-elctions - but alas, the EC did not do this but contradicted the Perak Speaker, and declared that there was no resignation - no vacancy - no by-elections. I doubt if they would have done the same if it was some BN ruled State Assembly speaker)

- in suddenly creating a 'new rule' about not being able to display flags/materials if the said party was not contesting in the by-elctions. It was specifically directed at the Pakatan Rakyat political parties. They said that all BN parties could however do so since BN was legally See earlier post:- Only PAS flag, materials (maybe speakers later) allowed for Bkt Gantang by-elections - so UNJUST

- now this non-sense about PSM (after the ROS has approved their registration)...

Parti Socialis Malaysia (PSM) is concerned that if the Election Commission (EC) does not approve its party logo – a fist – it may not be able to contest in any state election.

Founding member Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj said that the EC, in its letter dated Feb 13, had questioned the PSM logo because “it is morally unsuitable” and “has connotations of violence.”....

....The EC would not be independent in its decision making if it rejects the symbol, Dr Devaraj said.

“They should be consistent in their decision since Umno has a keris symbol and the tiger symbol of an independent contesting in the Bukit Selambau by-election was approved recently,” he said.

Since PSM received approval from the Home Ministry and the ROS last August, it had submitted copies of its registration certificate, party constitution, organisation chart and party logo as required by the EC in order to register as a political party for elections, he said. - Star, 30/3/2009, PSM is still waiting for EC’s approval


We want Local Council elections - we already have the Act. So, why the delay? FEAR?

Have we all forgotten about that promise to have Local Council Elections?

Some said that we needed time, and that Local Council Elections would be held soon before the end of 2009 at least in the States still under Pakatan Rakyat - now clearly 4. Who controls Perak is controversial - we have 2 Menteri Besars, etc..

Well, when are we going to have that Local Council Elections..

If it was done in 2008, immediately after PR became government in 5 States, we could have had the 2nd elections by 2011, before the next General Elections..now maybe, the chance is lost...

We hear almost no talk about Local Council Elections - and I am concerned. Is work being done for the preparation for Local Council Elections by end 2009 at all...

There will be by-elections..and by-elections...party hopping, etc...and 'constitutional crisis' - but it no excuse for not doing the required to have the Local Council Elections.

Even if no Local Council Elections - at least do the Kampung, Taman, etc elections first - and there is nothing that stands in the way of this.

Just to share with you all, theLOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS ACT 1960 (Revised 1991)ACT 473.

YES - there already is such an Act in place. Remember we did have Local Council Elemctions until UMNO-led coalition decided to stop them because the worry then was, I believe, that other than persons from the UMNO-led coalition of parties may be elected in as Local Councillors. Is this the same fear now that the Pakatan Rakyat State Governments have..

Maybe, it is time for Pakatan Rakyat to re-affirm its commitment that, at the very least, they will do the very best to have Local Council (or Local Government) Elections before the end of 2009.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTIONS ACT 1960 (Revised 1991)

ACT 473

PREAMBLE

PART I - PRELIMINARY

1. Short title.

2. Interpretation.

PART II - CONSTITUTIONS OF MUNICIPALITIES

3. Administration of municipalities.

4. Grant of Constitution of municipality.

PART III - TOWN AND RURAL BOARDS

5. Elections of members of Town and Rural Boards.

PART IIIA - LOCAL COUNCILS

5A. Elections of members of Local Councils.

PART IV- COUNCILLORS

6. Qualifications of Councillor.

7. Provision against double membership.

8. Effect of disqualification, and prohibition of nomination or appointment without consent.

9. Resignation.

10. Absence of Councillor.

11. Decision as to disqualifications.

11A. Appointment and power of Secretaries in Town Councils.

12. Casual vacancies.

13. General election.

13A. Filling of vacancies.

PART V- SUPERVISION OF ELECTIONS

14. Appointment of Supervisor of Elections and other officers.

15. Powers of Supervisor of Elections.

16. Powers of Election Commission relating to wards, etc.

PART VI -ELECTIONS

17. Qualifications of electors.

18. Electoral rolls.

19. Elections.

20. Power of the Election Commission to make regulations for the registration of electors.

21. Powers of the Election Commission to make regulations for the conduct of elections.

PART VII- GENERAL

22. Cesser of application of certain laws.

23. Special provision relating to orders under section 52 of the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance, 1950.

24. Saving concerning the Federal Capital.

FIRST SCHEDULE (Section 6) - Qualifications of Councillor

SECOND SCHEDULE (Section 17)

THIRD SCHEDULE (Section 11A)

Preamble

An Act for the purpose of ensuring uniformity of law and policy in respect of local government elections throughout Malaysia and for matters incidental thereto.

[West Malaysia-1 June 1960; East Malaysia]

[Enacted in 1960 as Act 11/60. Revised in 1991 and published as Laws of Malaysia Act 473. The revised version came into force on 16 September 1991.]

BE IT ENACTED by the Duli Yang Maha Mulia Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-Pertuan Agong with the advice and consent of the Dewan Negara and Dewan Rakyat in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

PART I

PRELIMINARY

1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the Local Government Elections Act 1960.

2. Interpretation.

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires-

"ballot paper" means any paper referred to in section 19(2);

"candidate" means a person who is nominated, in accordance with any regulations applicable to such nomination, as a candidate for election;

"Constitution" in relation to any municipality means the Constitution for the time being in force granted to such municipality;

"Councillor" means, in respect of-

(a) a City Council, the Mayor, Deputy Mayor and any Councillor of such Council;

(b) a Municipal Council, the President, Deputy President and any Councillor of such Council;

(c) a Town Council, District Council or Rural District Council, the President, Deputy President and any Councillor or member of such Council;

(d) a Local Council, the Chairman, Deputy Chairman and any member of such Council;

"contested election" means an election at which more candidates have been nominated than there are vacancies to be filled;

"Deputy President" includes a Deputy Mayor or Deputy Chairman;

"election" means an election for the purpose of electing a Councillor;

"elector" means a person qualified as an elector in accordance with section 17 and entitled to be registered as an elector to vote at an election;

"electoral roll" means an electoral roll kept and maintained under regulations made under section 20;

"electoral ward" means a division of the local area made by the Election Commission under section 16;

"general election" means an election held pursuant to section 13 or 23;

"local area" means the area under the jurisdiction of a local authority;

"local authority" means the Council of any municipality to which a Constitution has been granted or any Town Board or Rural Board to which a direction has been given under the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance 1950, or this Act, or any Local Council to which a direction has been given under section 5A as the case may be;

"Local Council" means a Local Council established under section 4 of the Local Councils Ordinance 1952;

"municipality" means a municipality created under the provisions of the Municipal Ordinance;

"Municipal Ordinance" means the Municipal Ordinance of the Straits Settlements in force in the States of Malacca and Penang and as applicable to the States of Johore, Kedah, Kelantan, Negeri Sembilan, Pahang, Perak, Perlis, Selangor and Trengganu by the Municipal Ordinance (Extended Application) Ordinance 1948;

"President" includes a Mayor or Chairman;

"registered elector" means in relation to any electoral ward or division an elector whose name at the date of the election appears on the electoral roll for such ward or division; and "registering officer", "revising officer", "returning officer" and "Supervisor of Elections" or "Supervisor" in relation to the local area or an electoral ward or division mean respectively a registering officer, a revising officer, a returning officer and the Supervisor of Elections appointed under section 14 in respect of the local area or an electoral ward or division of the local area;

"State Authority" means the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri of the State, as the case may require;

"voter" means a person who, whether his name does or does not appear in an electoral roll, applies to vote or votes at an election.

PART II

CONSTITUTIONS OF MUNICIPALITIES

3. Administration of municipalities.

(1) Notwithstanding any provision of the Municipal Ordinance to the contrary the municipal affairs of every municipality in a State shall be administered by a Council consisting of a President and a Deputy President (if one be appointed) and such number of elected or of elected and of appointed Councillors as may be prescribed by the Constitution granted to such municipality:

Provided that nothing in this subsection shall prevent the Legislature of a State to provide in the Municipal Ordinance for the transfer of any of the functions of the Council relating to the municipal affairs of the municipality to any person, officer or authority for such period as the State Authority may deem necessary or desirable in the public interest.

(2) Such Constitution may provide for the election of the President and of all the Councillors, and shall in all cases provide that-

(a) the total number of Councillors (exclusive of the President) shall be not less than six and not more than twenty-four; and

(b) the number of elected Councillors shall be at least a majority of the total number of Councillors (exclusive of the President).

4. Grant of Constitution of municipality.

(1) The State Authority shall, after consultation with the Election Commission in respect of the boundaries of the local area and the number of Councillors to be elected to such municipality, by order grant to each municipality created within the State under the Municipal Ordinance at any time after the coming into operation of this Act, and within three months of the date of the notification creating such municipality, a Constitution under this Act.

(2) Subject to subsection (3), every Constitution granted under this Part may-

(a) prescribe the total number of Councillors;

(b) prescribe the number of Councillors to be elected and the number (if any) to be appointed;

(c) prescribe the manner in which the President and Deputy President of the Council shall be appointed or elected;

(d) prescribe the powers and duties of the Deputy President of the Council;

(e) subject to this Act, prescribe the disqualifications of Councillors and candidates for election as Councillors;

(f) prescribe the manner in which appointed Councillors shall be appointed and, subject to the provisions of this Act, the term of office of appointed Councillors;

(g) subject to this Act, prescribe the circumstances in which the seat of any Councillor shall become vacant and the manner in which such vacancy shall be filled;

(h) prescribe the number of Councillors present at any meeting which shall constitute a quorum;

(i) provide for the payment to Councillors of allowances and other privileges and of a salary or allowance to the Councillor for the time being performing the duties of the President or Deputy President;

(j) regulate or authorise the making of rules by the Council of the municipality to regulate the procedure at meetings.

(3) Every Constitution granted under this section shall be laid on the table of the Legislative Assembly of the State concerned and shall not come into operation until it has been approved, with or without amendment, by a resolution of such Legislative Assembly.

(4) Upon a Constitution being approved under subsection (3) it shall, together with any amendments so approved, be published in the Gazette of the State within which the municipality is situate.

(5) Every Constitution published under subsection (4) shall have the force of law and shall have effect notwithstanding any provision in the Municipal Ordinance to the contrary; and on and after the date of the coming into operation of any such Constitution any reference in any written law to the President or Deputy President or to the Municipal Commissioners or to the Municipal Commissioner or Commissioners of a municipality to which such Constitution refers shall be deemed to be a reference to the President or the Deputy President or to the Municipal Councillor or Councillors respectively appointed or elected under such Constitution; and such Councillors shall be deemed to be the successors of any Commissioners appointed for such municipality under the Municipal Ordinance without any break in such succession, as if such Councillors had been duly appointed under such Ordinance:

Provided that where the State Authority pursuant to any power in the Municipal Ordinance transfers any of the functions of the Council relating to the municipal affairs of a municipality to any person, officer or authority the Constitution aforesaid (or so much of the provisions thereof as may be specified in the order effecting such transfer) shall during the period of the transfer be deemed to be suspended and shall cease to have the force of law and shall cease to have effect.

(6) Subject to Article 76 of the Constitution, no Constitution in operation under this Act shall be amended, modified or repealed otherwise than by a law passed by the Legislature of a State.

PART III

TOWN AND RURAL BOARDS

5. Elections of members of Town and Rural Boards.

(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any written law which relates to Town Boards or Rural Boards in force in any State, the State Authority may, after consultation with the Election Commission in respect of the boundaries of the local area and the number of Councillors to be elected to the Town Council, Town Board or Rural Board having jurisdiction in such area, by order published in the Gazette of the State direct that the whole or a majority of the members of a Town Council, Town Board or Rural Board established in the State under any such written law shall be elected instead of appointed or nominated by the State Authority; and where any such order is made in respect of a Town Board or Rural Board such Board shall thereupon be called a Town Council, District Council or Rural District Council, as the case may be, and every member thereof shall be styled a Councillor.

(2) Subject to subsection (3) every order made under this Part may-

(a) prescribe the total number of Councillors;

(b) prescribe the number of Councillors to be elected and the number (if any) to be appointed;

(c) prescribe the manner in which the President and Deputy President of the Council shall be appointed or elected;

(d) prescribe the powers and duties of the Deputy President of the Council;

(e) subject to this Act, prescribe the disqualifications of Councillors and candidates for election as Councillors;

(f) prescribe the manner in which appointed Councillors shall be appointed and, subject to this Act, the term of office of appointed Councillors;

(g) subject to this Act, prescribe the circumstances in which the seat of any Councillor shall become vacant and the manner in which such vacancy shall be filled;

(h) provide for the payment to Councillors of allowances and other privileges.

(3) The State Authority may at any time amend, modify or repeal any order made under this section.

PART IIIA

LOCAL COUNCILS

5A. Elections of members of Local Councils.

(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the provisions of any written law which relates to Local Councils in force in any State, the State Authority may, after consultation with the Election Commission in respect of the boundaries of the local area and the number of Councillors to be elected to the Local Council having jurisdiction in such area, by order published in the Gazette of the State direct that the whole or a majority of the members of a Local Council shall be elected under this Act.

(2) Subject to subsection (3) every order made under this Part may-

(a) prescribe the total number of Councillors;

(b) prescribe the number of Councillors to be elected and the number (if any) to be appointed;

(c) provide for a Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Council and prescribe the manner in which they shall be appointed or elected;

(d) prescribe the powers and duties of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Council;

(e) Subject to this Act, prescribe the disqualification of Councillors and candidates for election as Councillors, and provide that, notwithstanding section 6, paragraph 2(g) of the First Schedule shall not apply to such class or description of officer in any public service in Malaysia as the State Authority may by notification in the Gazette prescribe;

(f) prescribe the manner in which appointed Councillors shall be appointed and, subject to this Act, the term of office of appointed Councillors;

(g) subject to this Act, prescribe the circumstances in which the seat of any Councillor shall become vacant and the manner in which such vacancy shall be filled;

(h) provide for the payment to Councillors of allowances and other privileges;

(i) prescribe the form of any declaration of acceptance of office as a Councillor;

(j) provide for the procedure, quorum and meetings of the Local Council.

(3) The State Authority may at any time amend, modify or repeal any order made under this section.

PART IV

COUNCILLORS

6. Qualifications of Councillor.

Every person with the qualifications specified in the First Schedule is qualified to be a Councillor unless he is disqualified under the said Schedule.

7. Provision against double membership.

A person shall not be elected as a Councillor for more than one electoral ward, nor be both an elected and appointed Councillor.

8. Effect of disqualification, and prohibition of nomination or appointment without consent.

(1) If a Councillor becomes disqualified for membership of a local authority, or dies, his seat shall become vacant.

(2) If a person disqualified for being a Councillor is elected or appointed to a local authority, or if an election or appointment is contrary to section 7, the election or appointment shall be void.

(3) (Repealed by Act 20/1965).

(4) A person cannot be validly nominated for election or appointed as a Councillor without his consent .

(5) Subsection (4) shall not apply to any public officer who is appointed as an official or ex officio Councillor.

9. Resignation.

(1) A Councillor may resign his office by writing under his hand addressed to the President of the local authority.

(2) Any Councillor so resigning shall, subject to the provisions of this Part, be eligible for re-election or re-appointment.

10. Absence of Councillor.

If a Councillor is without leave of the President of the local authority absent from three consecutive ordinary meetings of the local authority or fails during a period of three consecutive months to attend at least one meeting of any standing committee to which he may have been appointed the local authority may by resolution declare his seat vacant.

11. Decision as to disqualifications.

If any question arises whether a Councilor has become disqualified for membership of a local authority, the decision of the local authority shall be taken by resolution, and such resolution, when approved by the State Authority, shall be final:

Provided that this section shall not be taken to prevent the practice of the local authority postponing a decision in order to allow for the taking or determination of any proceedings that may affect the decision (including proceedings for the removal of the disqualification).

11A. Appointment and power of Secretaries in Town Councils.

(1) In relation to a Town Council, the President of which is an elected Councillor, and in respect of which the written law specified in column 1 of the Third Schedule applies, the State Authority may in the order made under section 5-

(a) provide for the appointment by the State Authority of a Secretary; and

(b) prescribe the tenure of office and the duties of the Secretary.

(2) All the functions of a president of a Town Council aforesaid (other than the functions specified in the corresponding column 2 of the Third Schedule) shall on the appointment of a Secretary, be exercisable only by the Secretary.

12. Casual vacancies.

(1) (Repealed by Act 49/61).

(2) Whenever a casual vacancy among the elected Councillors of a local authority occurs within six months before the date of the next general election, an election shall not be held to fill the vacancy but the vacancy shall be filled at such general election:

Provided that if upon a vacancy or a number of simultaneous vacancies so occurring more than three months before the date of the next general election the total number of unfilled vacancies exceeds one-third of the total number of elected Councillors this subsection shall not apply and a Councillor shall be elected to fill each of such vacancies.

(3) A person elected to fill a casual vacancy in the seat of an elected Councillor shall hold office until the date upon which the Councillor in whose place he is elected would regularly have retired.

(4) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, if at any time within three months before the date of the next general election the number of seats of the elected Councillors of a local authority which are vacant from any cause whatever exceeds one-half of the total number of seats of such elected Councillors the State Authority may if he shall think it necessary for the due discharge of the functions of the authority, appoint persons to fill all or any of such vacant seats:

Provided that every such appointment shall determine upon the date of the next general election following the appointment.

(5) For the purpose of this section and of section 13A a vacancy shall be treated as having occurred on the date on which it is established that there was a vacancy.

13. General election.

(1) The Councillors elected at each general election to a local authority shall, subject to this Act, hold office for a period of three years from the date appointed by the State Authority pursuant to subsection 2.

(2) A general election in respect of all the elected seats of a local authority shall be held within sixty days of the expiration of the period of three years referred to in subsection (1), and the local authority shall meet on such date, being not later than thirty days from the date of such general election, as the State Authority may appoint.

(3) The Councillors elected or appointed to any local authority who are members of such authority immediately prior to the expiration of the three years prescribed in subsection (1) may continue in office until the day preceding the date appointed under subsection (2).

13A. Filling of vacancies.

If for any reason-

(a) an election is not held on the day appointed for the election or within the appointed time;

(b) an election fails wholly or in part or becomes void; or

(c) a casual vacancy occurs among the elected Councillors,

the Election Commission shall within sixty days from the date on which it becomes aware of the facts contained in paragraph (a), (b), or (c), conduct an election.

13B.Election may be held after sixty days.

Notwithstanding section 13(2) and section 13A an election (whether a general election or an election to fill a casual vacancy) may be held after the expiration of the period of sixty days mentioned in the said subsection (2) or the said section 13A, where the Election Commission, upon representation in that behalf being made to it by a State Authority, is satisfied that the holding of such election within the period of sixty days aforesaid is impracticable or would not be in the interest of the public.

PART V

SUPERVISION OF ELECTIONS

14. Appointment of Supervisor of Elections and other officers.

(1) The Election Commission may appoint in respect of each local authority a Supervisor of Elections and such registering, revising and returning officers, assistant returning officers and other election officers for the local area as may be necessary.

(2) The Election Commission may, from time to time, appoint such number of clerks and interpreters as may be necessary for the purposes of this Act.

15. Powers of Supervisor of Elections.

The Supervisor of Elections shall, subject to the general direction and control of the Election Commission, in regard to the local authority-

(a) have general direction and supervision over the administrative conduct of elections of Councillors and enforce on the part of all registering, revising and returning officers, presiding officers and other election officers fairness, impartiality and compliance with the provisions of this Act and of any regulations made thereunder applicable to such elections;

(b) have power to issue to registering, revising and returning officers, presiding officers, and other election officers such directions as he may deem necessary to ensure effective execution of the provisions of this Act or of any regulations made thereunder applicable thereto;

(c) have power to administer any oaths required to be taken under this Act or under any regulations made thereunder;

(d) exercise and perform all other powers and duties which are conferred and imposed upon him by this Act or by any regulations made thereunder.

16. Powers of Election Commission relating to wards, etc.

(1) The Election Commission shall by notification in the Gazette of the State concerned, in respect of each local area-

(a) divide the local area into electoral wards and such other divisions as the Commission may consider necessary or expedient for election purposes;

(b) specify the names of the wards and other divisions of the local area and assign a distinguishing letter or letters or number or both to each such ward and division;

(c) appoint a place and, where the Commission considers it necessary or expedient so to do in the special circumstances of the case two or more places as the polling station or stations for each ward and division.

(2) The Election Commission may use free of charge as a polling station any school or any portion of a school in receipt of a grant, or in respect of which a grant is made, out of monies provided by any Government in Malaysia.

(3) The Election Commission shall make good any damage done to, and defray any expenses incurred by the persons having control over any school or portion thereof by reason of its being used as a polling station under subsection (2).

PART VI

ELECTIONS

17. Qualifications of electors.

(1) Every citizen with the qualifications specified in the Second Schedule is entitled to vote in an electoral ward in any election to a local authority unless he is disqualified under the said Schedule.

(2) No person shall in the same election to any local authority vote in more than one electoral ward.

(3) If a person is in an electoral ward by reason only of being a patient in an establishment maintained wholly or mainly for the reception and treatment of persons suffering from mental illness or mental defectiveness or of being detained in custody he shall for the purposes of subsection (1) be deemed not to be residentin that ward.

18. Electoral rolls.

(1) The electoral rolls shall, unless the Election Commission shall otherwise direct, be combined with the register for Parliamentary electors and State electors maintained under the Election Act 1958.

(2) For the purpose of preparing the electoral rolls relating to the first general election to any Local Council held under this Act, the Election Commission may use such parts of the current electoral rolls relating to Parliamentary or State Constituencies as relate to any polling district situated within the local area of such Council.

19. Elections.

(1) Subject to the provisions of the Election Offences Act 1954, the candidate for an electoral ward who polls the greatest number of valid votes cast by the registered electors of such ward shall be deemed to be the elected Councillor for such ward:

Provided that if more than one Councillor is required to be elected for such ward, candidates shall be deemed to be elected Councillors in accordance with the relative number of such valid votes polled by them.

(2) In any poll in a contested election the vote of each voter shall be given by means of a paper marked by the voter to indicate his vote, which shall be inserted by the voter in a closed ballot box provided for the purpose in such manner that the vote given by such voter shall be secret:

Provided that if any voter is unable to read, his vote may be given in any such manner as may be prescribed.

(3) No person shall be entitled to more than one vote at any election:

Provided that if more than one Councillor is required to be elected for an electoral ward each voter shall be entitled to a vote in respect of each vacancy to be filled at such election.

20. Power of the Election Commission to make regulations for the registration of electors.

(1) The Election Commission may make regulations for the registration of electors and for all matters incidental thereto.

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may-

(a) prescribe the keeping and maintenance of electoral rolls in the local area or in any electoral ward or division of the local area and the form of such rolls;

(b) prescribe the procedure to be followed in the preparation and publication of electoral rolls therein;

(c) prescribe the time at which any electoral rolls shall be revised and the procedure to be followed in making such revision;

(d) prescribe the procedure to be followed in the preparation and publication of new electoral rolls of any electoral ward or division where the boundaries of such ward or division have been altered or where such ward or division has been created after the preparation of electoral rolls;

(e) prescribe the procedure to be followed in the making and determination of claims to have any name inserted in an electoral roll or in a new or revised electoral roll and of objections to the insertion or inclusion of any name therein;

(f) provide for the payment of compensation, not exceeding fifty ringgit, to any person aggrieved by the making without reasonable cause of an objection to the insertion or inclusion of his name in any electoral roll;

(g) prescribe any form of application, notice or other document which it may be necessary or desirable to use in connection with any of the matters dealt with in this section;

(h) authorise any registering officer or revising officer, for the purpose of considering or determining any application, claim, objection or appeal which he is required to consider or determine under any regulations made under this section, to summon any person to appear before him and to give evidence on oath or affirmation and to administer any such oath or affirmation for such purpose and to order the production of any document relevant to any issue which such officer is required to consider and determine;

(i) prescribe the fees to be paid upon any application, notice, claim or objection and the manner in which such fees shall be disposed of;

(j) prescribe the manner in which any electoral roll or new or revised electoral roll shall be certified and provide that such electoral roll shall be conclusive evidence, in such manner and subject to such exceptions and limitations as may be so provided, of the right or non-existence of the right of any person to vote at any election in the electoral ward or division to which such roll relates;

(k) provided for the correction of clerical errors in any electoral roll;

(l) prescribe the form of notices and certificates to be used under the Second Schedule.

21. Powers of the Election Commission to make regulations for the conduct of elections.

(1) Subject to section 17, the Election Commission may make regulations for the conduct of elections and for all matters incidental thereto.

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power such regulations may-

(a) prescribe the date of the holding of any election and the manner in which notice of the holding of such elections shall be given;

(b) prescribe the procedure for the nomination of candidates and for the making of, and decision on, objections to any nomination;

(c) prescribe the amount of any deposit, not exceeding two hundred and fifty ringgit in each case, to be made by or on behalf of candidates and the circumstances in which such deposit may be forfeited;

(d) provide for the publication of notice of the date on which a poll in the case of a contested election will be taken;

(e) prescribe the facilities to be provided at polling stations, and the persons who may be admitted to polling stations on the date at which a poll is taken and provide for the appointment of presiding officers in respect of polling stations;

(f) prescribe the manner in which votes may be cast and the construction and sealing of ballot boxes used in such elections and for the issue of ballot papers to electors;

(g) provide for the manner in which, and the persons by whom, any question as to the identity of any person claiming to vote shall be determined;

(h) prescribe the form of any ballot papers and counterfoils to be used in elections;

(i) prescribe the manner in which ballot boxes, unused or spoilt ballot papers, marked copies of the register of electors, counterfoils of ballot papers, and other documents shall be dealt with upon the closing of the poll;

(j) prescribe the procedure to be followed in the counting of votes and the circumstances in which votes may be rejected by a returning officer as invalid;

(k) provide for the making and publication of returns by the returning officer and of a statement of the poll in regard to any election;

(l) prescribe such forms as may be necessary or desirable to be used in connection with the matters dealt with in this section or any regulations made thereunder;

(m) provide that certain acts are to be deemed illegal or corrupt practices for the purposes of the Election Offences Act 1954.

PART VII

GENERAL

22. Cesser of application of certain laws.

(1) On the coming into operation of this Act-

(a) in any State other than the States of Penang and Johore, Parts I, II, III, IV, VII and VIII of the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance 1950, shall, subject to this Part, cease to apply to such State;

(b) in the State of Penang, Parts I, II, VII and VIII of the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance 1950, and the Penang Conduct of Elections Authorisation Enactment 1958, shall subject to this Part, cease to apply to such State;

(c) in the State of Johore, Parts I, II, VII and VIII of the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance 1950, and the Johore Conduct of Town Council Elections Enactment 1959, shall, subject to this Part, cease to apply to such State,

and such cesser shall be deemed to be a repeal for the purposes of the Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967.

(2) All orders, directions, appointments, notifications and regulations made under the laws referred to in subsection (1) and still subsisting or in force immediately before the coming into operation of this Act in any State shall, insofar as they apply to the State and are not inconsistent with this Act, be deemed to have been made under this Act and shall continue in force until other provision shall be made under this Act or until the date upon which they expire.

(3) Within three months of the coming into operation of this Act the State Authority shall, after consultation with the Election Commission in respect of the boundaries of the local area and the number of Councillors to be elected to such municipality, by order grant to each municipality created within the State under Municipal Ordinance and in respect of which an order under section 4 of the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance 1950, is in force immediately before the coming into operation of this Act a constitution under this Act; and Part II (other than section 4(1)) shall apply to every such Constitution as if it were a Constitution granted under that Part.

23. Special provision relating to orders under section 52 of the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance, 1950.

(1) Upon the expiry of any order made under section 52 of the Local Authorities Elections Ordinance 1950, and in force in any State in relation to any local authority in the State immediately before the date of the coming into operation of this Act the term of office of all Councillors of such authority shall determine and a general election shall be held in respect of the vacancies in the seats of such Councillors or, in the case of appointed Councillors, appointments thereto shall be made, within sixty days from the date of such determination, and the local authority shall meet on such date, being not later than thirty days from the date of such general election, as the State Authority may appoint:

Provided that notwithstanding any such determination of the term of their office such Councillors may continue in office as if they had been elected or appointed, as the case may be, under this Act until the day preceding the date appointed under this subsection.

(2) Notwithstanding section 13(1), the Councillors elected under subsection (1) shall, subject to the other provisions of this Act, hold office for a period of two years from the date of the general election referred to in subsection (1); and section 13(3) shall have effect as if for the reference to the three years contained therein there were a reference to a period of two years.

24. Saving concerning the Federal Capital.

Nothing in this Act shall affect the Constitution of the Municipality of Kuala Lumpur, as from time to time amended, or the Federal Capital (Municipal Elections) Ordinance, 1958.

FIRST SCHEDULE

(Section 6)

Qualifications of Councillor

1. A person shall be qualified to be a Councillor under section 6 if?

(a) he is not less than twenty-one years old;

(b) in the case of an elected Councillor, he is a citizen; and

(c) he is not disqualified under paragraph 2 of this Schedule.

2. A person shall be disqualified for being a Councillor if?

(a) he is and has been found or declared to be of unsound mind; or

(b) he is an undischarged bankrupt; or

(c) he has been convicted of an offence under the Election Offences Act 1954, or has in proceedings relating to any election in Malaysia been proved guilty of an act constituting such offence; or

(d) having been nominated for election to either House of Parliament or the Legislative Assembly of a State or a local authority, or having acted as election agent to a person so nominated, he has failed to lodge any return of election expenses required by law within the time and in the manner so required; or

(e) in a court of law in Malaysia, there has been proved against him, or he has been convicted on, a charge in respect of?

(i) an offence involving fraud or dishonesty; or

(ii) an offence under any law relating to corruption; or

(iii) any other offence for which he is sentenced to imprisonment for a term of not less than one year or to a fine of not less than two thousand ringgit and has not received a free pardon; or

(f) he has voluntarily acquired citizenship of, or exercised rights of citizenship in a foreign country or has made a declaration of allegiance to a foreign country; or

(g) in the case of an elected Councillor, he holds any whole-time office in any public service in Malaysia; or

(h) without the written permission of the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri of the State he is concerned or interested in any contract or work made with or done for the local authority:

Provided that?

(i) a person shall not be deemed to be so concerned or interested merely by reason of his being a shareholder in or a director (other than the chairman or managing director) of a duly incorporated company which has a contract with or executes work for the local authority;

(ii) this paragraph shall not apply to contracts made with a local authority for the supply to a Councillor of water, gas, electricity or other local authority services;

(iii) this paragraph shall not apply to contracts the consideration for which does not exceed one hundred and fifty ringgit; or

(i) he has, during the period of five years preceding the election, been convicted of an offence under section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948 which is an offence by reason of section 3(1)(f) of that Act; or

(j) he is subject to such other disqualification as may be prescribed in the Constitution granted under Part II or the order made under Part III or Part IIIA in respect of the local authority.

3. The disqualification of a person under paragraph 2(c), (d) or (e) may be removed by the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri of the State and shall, if not so removed, cease at the end of the period of five years beginning with the date on which the person convicted as mentioned in the said paragraph (c) was convicted or released from imprisonment or proved guilty, whichever shall be the later, or the date on which the return mentioned in the said subparagraph (d) was required to be lodged or, in the case of a person mentioned in the said subparagraph (e), the date on which the charge was proved against such person or the date on which he was convicted or the date on which the carrying out of any punishment (including the carrying out of the terms of any bond ordered to be executed as a consequence of a charge having been proved or a conviction having been had) imposed upon such person was completed, whichever of these dates shall be the later, and a person shall not be disqualified under paragraph 2(f) by reason only of anything done by him before he became a citizen.

4. In paragraph 2 "foreign country" does not include any part of the Commonwealth or the Republic of Ireland.

SECOND SCHEDULE

(Section 17)

Qualifications of Elector

1. A citizen shall be entitled to vote in an electoral ward under section 17 if?

(a) he has attained the age of twenty-one years on the qualifying date; and

(b) he is resident within the electoral ward on the qualifying date or, if he is not so resident, if?

(i) he is the owner of immovable property within such ward with an assessed net annual value of at least sixty ringgit or an improved value of at least five hundred ringgit; and

(ii) he has paid such rates as have been assessed thereon and are payable thereon, in accordance with the provisions of any law relating to rating for the time being in force, for the year or half-year ending on December 31 of the year preceding such qualifying date; and

(iii) he has filed with the Election Commission within the registration or revision period notice in the prescribed form of his desire to have his name placed on or retained in the electoral roll for such ward, together with a certificate in the prescribed form that he has complied with the qualification specified in subparagraphs (i) and (ii); and

(c) his name is on the current electoral roll relating to such ward in accordance with this Act and any regulations made thereunder; and

(d) he is not disqualified under paragraph 2:

Provided that where a person who is not so resident is the owner of immovable property referred to in subparagraph (i) in more than one electoral ward of the local area, he shall be entitled as a non-resident voter, and on compliance with this paragraph, to only one vote in such local area, in respect of such electoral ward thereof as he may, in giving the notice required by subparagraph (iii), specify in such notice.

2. A citizen shall be disqualified for voting if?

(a) on the qualifying date he is detained as a person of unsound mind or is serving a sentence of imprisonment; or

(b) having before the qualifying date been convicted in any part of the Commonwealth of an offence and sentenced to death or imprisonment for a term exceeding twelve months, he remains liable on the qualifying date to suffer any punishment for that offence; or

(c) he is disqualified under any law relating to offences committed in connection with elections.

3. In this Schedule?

"qualifying date" means the date by reference to which the electoral rolls are prepared or revised;

"registration period" or "revision period" means the period within which electors may apply for registration or within which the electoral rolls are revised, as the case may be.

4. The State Authority may by order notified in the Gazette direct that paragraph 1(b) shall not apply in relation to such local authority, or description of local authority, as may be specified in such order; and on the coming into force of any such order such subparagraph shall be deemed to be repealed in relation to such local authority, and replaced by the following subparagraph:

"(b) he is resident within the electoral ward on the qualified date;"

THIRD SCHEDULE

(Section 11A)

(1)

(2)

Town Boards Enactment of the Federated Malay States (F.M.S. Cap.137)

(1)The functions relating to meetings provided by Part II;

(2) The functions provided by subsection (iii) of section 44 and Parts V and VI.

Town Boards Enactment of Johore (Enactment No.118)

Town Boards Enactment of Trengganu (Enactment No. 12 of 1355)





Sunday, March 29, 2009

NO DAP flags, materials for 3 by-elections - ABSURD

No DAP flags and materials for these 3 by-elections is absurd.

We all know Pakatan Rakyat is PKR, DAP and PAS..

See earlier post :Only PAS flag, materials (maybe speakers later) allowed for Bkt Gantang by-elections - so UNJUST

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Only PAS flag, materials (maybe speakers later) allowed for Bkt Gantang by-elections - so UNJUST

Malaysia's 'independent' Election Commission has done it again...

No DAP, PKR flags material for the Bkt Gantang by elections. (Only PAS flags and material allowed)

No PAS and DAP flags/material for Bkt Selambau and Batang Ai - only PKR flags/materials.

Shocking how they make such announcements at the 11th hour - as nominations are tommorrow...and all posters, campaign materials have all been prepared, printed and paid for...

No such rule for all previous by-elections or even General Elections according to my memory...

Free and fair elections....

DAP and other irrelevant parties in Pakatan Rakyat are barred from displaying party materials during the tri by-elections in Bukit Selambau, Bukit Gantang and Batang Ai.

Election Commission deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said that as Pakatan Rakyat was a loose coalition which was not legally recognised, its component parties were not allowed to display party flags, banners and logos during the campaign period.

“We also do not allow irrelevant parties to apply for ceramah permit.

For example, in Bukit Selambau, we only allow PKR to apply for ceramah permits and display party materials. In Bukit Gantang only PAS flags can be displayed, he said.

However, Barisan Nasional component parties were free to display their respective party flags as it was a legally recognised coalition, he added.

DAP and other irrelevant parties in Pakatan Rakyat are barred from displaying party materials during the tri by-elections in Bukit Selambau, Bukit Gantang and Batang Ai.

Election Commission deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said that as Pakatan Rakyat was a loose coalition which was not legally recognised, its component parties were not allowed to display party flags, banners and logos during the campaign period.

“We also do not allow irrelevant parties to apply for ceramah permit.

For example, in Bukit Selambau, we only allow PKR to apply for ceramah permits and display party materials. In Bukit Gantang only PAS flags can be displayed, he said.

However, Barisan Nasional component parties were free to display their respective party flags as it was a legally recognised coalition, he added. - Star, 28/3/2009, ‘Irrelevant parties’ cannot display party flags at by-elections

Why? Because BN is a legally recognized coalition, and Pakatan is not...

All BN parties can fly their flags and display their materials BUT not Pakatan Rakyat parties...

Next, they will say only PAS members(and nobody else) can speak at ceramahs in Bukit Gantang by-elections...

I believe any party, group or persons should be allowed to display/distribute their flags/banners/posters/pamphlets materials during any elections. Of course, organisations and groups should be free to circulate their material in support of their chosen candidate.

Changing the rules at the eleventh hour is also very MEAN and unjust - an now maybe the UMNO-led BN controlled police will be out there pulling down pro-Pakatan Rakyat (pro-Opposition) materials ...maybe even making some arrests, etc..

Maybe, soon only members of contesting parties can be agents for the candidate - including polling and counting agents.

What is Malaysia coming to? Is it the flexing of muscle by the new UMNO chief?

UMNO leadership - strong and united? Don't kid around..

New PM - changes are coming

But is it for the better or for the worse..

Najib's concern is certainl not Malaysia and Malaysians. His primary concern seems to be UMNO - that 20-year old political party (Remember the UMNO was declared illegal - and was no more...then we had Mahathir-led UMNO Baru, and Tengku Razaleigh's Semangat 46).
"What is important is not individual feelings, but the future of Umno in this country!" added Najib. - Malaysiakini, 28/3/2009, Najib to abolish Umno's quota system
At least Mahathir Mohammad at one time was hinting about a new Barisan Nasional party - where members shall be of all ethnic groups, religions, cultures, etc..the Malaysian party. Believe that Pak Lah also did mention it once ...

Now, we have PKR (Parti Keadilan Rakyat), DAP, PRM(Parti Rakyat Malaysia) and maybe PSM (Parti Sosialis Malaysia) that claim to be truly Malaysian - and open to all irrespective of ethnicity, religion or culture.

Malaysian race - interesting to note that Wanita UMNO is also talking now about the Malaysian race. But alas you cannot move towards a Malaysian race when you talk about focusing the attention on one ethnic group.

Wanita Umno has proposed a formula to realise the formation of a Malaysian race as enshrined under Clause 3 of the Umno Constitution by outlining six thrusts. - Bernama, 27/3/2009, WANITA UMNO PROPOSES FORMULA FOR MALAYSIAN RACE

Najib, if he becomes PM, would things change?

- Will Uthayakumar, HINDRAF % and all those arrested and detained under the ISA and other laws that allow for Detention Without Trial be released...

- Will the 3-month suspension of HARAKAH and Suara Keadilan be immediately be revoked?

- Will there freedom of speech, opinion, expression and peaceful assembly be allowed to truly exist in Malaysia?

Interestingly this man, Najib, talks about justice being same for all BN and the Opposition.

Well, will be seeing more independent reporting in Television - would there be equitable and just opportunity given to those who do not subscribe to the UMNO-led BN views to express their views? We will be watching TV and monitoring the main-stream print media during these 3 by-elections in Kedah, Perak and Sarawak - and see whether is a fair coverage in the media, after Mohd Najib razak has become the President of UMNO. Whether by his actions he has ensured that there is that same justice for all.
He remarked that justice should not have double standards, one for the government and one for the opposition. - Malaysiakini, 28/3/2009, Najib to abolish Umno's quota system
The top post election winners are interesting.

We know that Hishamuddin Hussein Onn and Najib are realated (cousins) - and possibly in one team.

Muhyiddin - well, he was said by some to be the preferred choice of Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to be the DPM, but alas Najib (the VP with the highest number of votes) was not going to allow that - he wanted to be DPM. Respect for the elder, a value of many Asian cultures, was just not there in the quest to be DPM. Finally, after some time, Pak Lah gave in and named Najib as the DPM.

Muhyiddin did harbour thoughts of going for presidency - and then later 'gave in' to run for the post of Deputy President. So, is Muhyiddin and Najib in one team? I do not think so. Muhyiddin will be just waiting to prounce on Najib in his quest to be President - possibly PM of Malaysia. Why the need to pledge support...
Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin yesterday pledged his support to Datuk Seri Najib Razak to take charge of the government.
"I will do my very best if I am entrusted to be his deputy (deputy prime minister)," he said, but responded in jest that it was up to Najib to appoint him to the post when asked if he was sure the job was his. New Straits Times, 27/3/2009, Muhyiddin urges all leaders to close ranks
Muhyiddin also made an apparent bid to dispel allegations of his ambition to take over as the party president and the prime ministership.

pak lah and najib raising the umno flag agm 2009 260309 02“A number 2 must be like a number 2 and he cannot act like number 1. If I do, then the ship will sink."The experiences of all the number 2 will be my reference to serve and there is no better example of a number 2 than Najib,” he said to laughter from the delegates.

In typical Umno fashion, Muhyiddin then pledged his allegiance to Najib as the new Umno president and called on all party members to follow suit.
Was it in jest? Or Muhyiddin is really not sure of his future. Najib may chose Hishammuddin as the DPM. Why not?

After all, if the BN loses all 3 by-elections (or even 2 of the by-elections), blame will lie on Muhyiddin. Najib has put the '1st trap' for Muhyiddin.. Najib, as new President of UMNO should have just taken the responsibility himself - for after all he is still not PM yet. - Malaysiakini, 28/2/2009,
Muhyiddin to PM: I have done wrong, forgive me
If Mohd Ali Rustam contested, maybe Muhyiddin may have lost. Maybe, Najib did him a favour, and Muhyiddin now owes Najib - and will be totally loyal to Najib, when he became the PM. Let's not forget that Muhyiddin was not really 'loyal' to Abdullah Ahmad Badawi when he was PM...did he not 'derhaka' kepada pemimpin - but at least now he apologized.

The man who openly attacked Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s leadership and had undoubtedly hurt the prime minister’s feelings along the way apologised publicly today.

MCPX
Newly-elected party deputy president Muhyiddin Yassin in his closing speech today ‘poetically’ admitted to have done wrong to Abdullah and asked for his forgiveness.

najib mahathir pak lah umno 2009 agm final day 280309 11“I admit to have wronged you, I hope that you forgive me,” said Muhyiddin in citing a traditional Malay pantun (poem) to convey the message.

Muhyiddin was one of the main players behind the early retirement of Abdullah and was the most vocal Umno leader to have called for the latter to step down following the party’s poor electoral performance in the 12th general election in 2008, its poorest performance since 1969.

His public assaults triggered the domino effect that hastened Abdullah’s departure when other senior party leaders began to openly call on him to step down.
- Malaysiakini, 28/2/2009, Muhyiddin to PM: I have done wrong, forgive me

What about the Vice Presidents?
Ahmad Zahid Hamidi - Bagan Datok, Perak (1,592)
Hishammuddin Hussein - Sembrong, Johor (1,515)
Mohd Shafie Apdal - Semporna, Sabah (1,445)
Ahmad Zahidi Hamidi - he was the UMNO Youth President in 1998 - and was seen by many as an Anwar Ibrahim's man.
In a sign of a continuing sweep against Mr. Anwar's supporters, a seventh ally, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, head of the youth wing of the ruling party, was arrested today. He was also charged under the Internal Security Act. - New York Times, 22/9/1998, Malaysian Police Break Up Protests on Arrest
On 30/9/1998, Umno Youth Chief Zahid released from ISA, as well as 4 leaders of ABIM. And on 2/10/1998, Zahid announces his resignation as Umno Youth Chief. “The decision to resign is not due to any particular party or UMNO leader,” he told a news conference. “It is due to the realisation of the importance of party unity and the sacrifice I had to make as leader of the youth wing.”

“As a leader with responsibility, I thought resigning was something I had to do,” he said. “I will continue to work for the party as a member and I will remain in UMNO. I hope my descision is respected by all parties.” (source: AFP) [Source: Website]

Now, it was said that Zahid Hamidi's deputy, Hishammuddin Hussein grabbed the opportunity and forced Zahid to resign - and hence the begining of Hishamuddin Hussein as the UMNO Youth head until just a few days ago.

Has Zahid forgiven what Hishammudin did to him? Is he in the Najib team - a 100% loyal supporter? I wonder...

From the same website, which also gives a chronology - it may be of interest for us to remember 1998...and I have pasted this at the bottom of my post... (Note that I am not saying that this is 100% true - but is merely a version of the chronology of what happened)

Mohd Shafie Apdal - I have nothing to comment about him. Need more research...mmm

The other Vice Presidents - the UMNO Youth Head - no need to say anything there

The Wanita UMNO head - seen as a Pak Lah loyalist

The Puteri UMNO head - nothing to say there..

At the end of the day, we are talking about politicians - today they proclaim to the world that they fully support you...but tommorow, they stab you in the back...

Let us not forget the 'forcing out' of Tuanku Abdul Rahman, Dr M...and now our Pak Lah. Loyalty in politics really do not exist. PKR has seen it when 2 jumped boat in Perak. DAP also experienced it when Hee left the DAP. I do not trust politicians - let them prove it with their actions first. Stop getting happy because they said they will do this and that - wait until they have done it first before being happy.

Local Council Elections - the promise of Pakatan Rakyat...but alas, 28/3/2009, more than 1 year later and....

The end.

______________________

On 14th April 2008, around 8.50pm, deafening shouts of reformasi from the 20,000-strong (some say 40,000) crowd welcomed Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim arrival at Kampung Baru, central Kuala Lumpur, the venue for the Black 14 gathering held to welcome the expiry on his five-year ban from contesting in elections.

Time really flies. I still remember the bold headlines on all newspapers on the 3rd of September 1998, declaring “ANWAR SACKED”. Not many national headlines could top that, ever or since!

Noting the historic proportions of what was unveiling, I was completely engrossed and noted the minutest details from any source that I could find, at least for the first few weeks since the news broke.

One result of my efforts then was this chronology of events leading to the date of sacking and onwards to a few months later - I am not sure if this is available anywhere else. It must be noted that I did not jot down the exact sources of information then, so the authenticity of the following cannot be 100% ascertained.

—————————————————–

Chronology of events

1974

Detained under ISA until 1976 (22 months).

1982

Joined UMNO

1997

Poison pen letter

The book “50 Dalil Kenapa Anwar Tidak Boleh Jadi PM” hastily released.

7th June 1998

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim urges Umno members to stop the practice of cronyism, corruption and nepotism in the party. Umno Youth chief Datuk Zahid Hamidi echoed his call and said it was a serious problem in awarding of government contracts to bumiputra giant companies.

10th June

Zahid says Umno Youth will, at the the Umno General Assembly on June 18, reveal instances of nepotism in the awarding of mega projects.

13th June

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad denies foreign media reports of a rift between him and Anwar.

17th June

Anwar obtains an injunction against Khalid Jafri, author of 50 Dalil Mengapa Anwar Tidak Boleh Menjadi PM (50 Reasons why Anwar cannot become PM).

19th June

Dr Mahathir says he will support Anwar if there is a contest for the number two post. He also says that Umno will investigate whether Khalid’s book had any basis.

21st June

Anwar reiterates his loyalty to Dr Mahathir.

26th June

Police receives four reports in connection with Khalid’s book, including a report from former Malacca Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik.

30th June

Anwar refutes speculation that his position as Finance Minister will be undermined by the appointment of Tun Daim Zainuddin as Special Functions Minister.

1st July

Anwar says there is an attempt to topple him and claims that Khalid’s book is the tool used to achieve this. He also denies Bank Negara Governor Tan Sri Ahmad Mohd Dom would resign.

4th July

Anwar obtains fresh injunction on Khalid Jafri’s book.

11th July

Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Rahim Noor says police are making detail investigations into the book.

20th July

Anwar denies reports of policy differences with Dr Mahathir following the resignation of group editors of Berita Harian and Utusan Melayu.

31st July

Anwar succeeds in getting an interim injuction to stop distribution of Khalid’s book.

1st August

A businessman implicated in the Khalid’s book is detained for questioning.

7th August

Anwar again denies rumours that he will resign because of differences with Dr Mahathir.

11th August

Anwar, as Penang Umno liaison chief, along with the state’s 11 divisions, again pledges his loyalty to Dr Mahathir, reiterating his promise that he will not challenge Dr Mahathir in the next party’s elections.

12th August

* Khalid Jafri is charged in court and in connection with the case, Magnum Corporation Berhad’s executive director Datuk Nallakaruppan Solaiman, is charged with possessing 125 rounds of ammunition without permit.
* Anwar again denies rumours of him resigning.

15th August

Anwar calls on people to rally behind Dr Mahathir for the country’s economic recovery.

19th August

A Sessions Court fixes Khalid’s hearing for Dec 7.

22nd August

Attorney-General Tan Sri Mokhtar Abdullah does not rule out the possibility of more arrests in connection with Khalid’s book.

27th August

Bank Negara governor Tan Sri Ahmad Dom and his deputy Datuk Fong Weng Phak resign. No reasons given. Later it was reported that they quit in protest of the economic measures put forward by Mahathir.

31st August

Tension can be seen between the wives of the PM and DPM. According to Dr Wan Azizah, Dr Siti Hasmah adopted a regal pose and brushed her hand aside when Dr Wan tried to shake hands with her during the National Day celebrations in Penang. “In politics, you’ve got to have a thick skin”: Dr Wan Azizah. (source: Borneo Post (Sabah))

1st September

Evening: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad meets Mentris Besar at Sri Perdana while Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim meets Penang Umno division leaders at his official residence. Apparently, the PM wanted to show the MBs the “evidence” of Anwar’s “problem”, and to ask their opinion.

2nd September

* morning: rumours of Anwar resigning circulate among the press
* 10am: Anwar meets PM. PM asks him to resign. Anwar refuses. PM gives him until 3pm to relent.
* 4pm: Four journalists arrive at Anwar’s residence at 47, Jalan Damansara. A policeman on duty inside Anwar’s house asks them to stay outside. A number of cars believed to be of his supporters are seen parked inside the compound.
* 4.30pm: The group of journalists grows bigger and a few policemen are now seen inside the compound watching the gate.
* 5pm: More of Anwar’s friends and supporters begin arriving.
* 5.30pm: Two police cars and Land Rovers arrive to control rush hour traffic outside the house and the number of pressmen swells to about 50. They seal off part of the road leading to the homes of Anwar and Dr Mahathir.
* 6pm: More supporters arrive, including some who claim they are university students. By this time the crowd inside the house is estimated at 100.
* 7pm: Anwar’s sacking letter reaches him. A white Volvo with several people inside is seen leaving the house.
* 7.45pm: Three FRU trucks carrying personnel and one police Land Rover are seen passing by Anwar’s place and park in the area around the Prime Minister’s house, 100m away.
* 7.50pm: Anwar’s wife Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail comes out of the house alone, and drives off in a Mitsubishi Pajero. She looks calm. According to Anwar’s supporters, she drove to the Prime Minister’s official residence, 100m away. And according to some sources, Wan Azizah drove to say goodbye to the PM and Dr Siti Hasmah. There is some information saying that Dr Siti Hasmah was so touched that she wept.
* 8.30pm: One of the reporters calls Anwar’s press secretary Adlin M. Sabri, who is inside the house. When asked, Adlin says Anwar will not issue a statement and neither will he (Adlin). Asked what they are doing inside, he says they are praying.
* 8.45pm: One of Anwar’s lawyers, Sulaiman Abdullah, arrives at his house.
* 9.40pm: IGP Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor is seen passing by Anwar’s house in a Mercedes.
* 10.10pm: Two women place two candles at the driveway of the house, after being refused entry by the police.
* 11.30pm: IGP Tan Sri Rahim Noor tells reporters at Bukit Aman that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is under investigation for allegations made in book “50 reasons why Anwar cannot become Prime Minister.” He said police was monitoring the security situation in the country.

3rd September (Thursday)

* 1am: Anwar’s press secretary Adlin M. Zabri informs the media near his Jalan Damansara residence that the former Deputy Prime Minister has no statement to make.
* 1.15am: Anwar’s political secretary Anuar Shaari assures supporters that everything will be okay and tells them to go home.
* 5am: Journalists camp outside Sri Perdana and Anwar’s home while armed police patrol the area, keeping journalists and supporters about 100m away.
* 8.45am: Magnum public affairs director Datuk S. Nallakaruppan, who is detained under the ISA, is brought to the High Court at Jalan Raja for hearing of application to transfer him from the Bukit Aman lock-up to Sungai Buloh prison.
* 9.25am: Some 30 General Operations Force personnel armed with M-16s in two trucks stop outside Anwar’s residence. They get down and walk towards Sri Perdana.
* 9.40am: The hearing of Nalla’s case begins before Justice Abdul Wahab Patail and the contents of four affidavits are later made public.
* 10.35am: Nalla’s lawyers Manjeet Singh Dhillon and Balwant Singh Sidhu arrive at Anwar’s residence.
* 11.15am: The lawyers leave after declining to say if they briefed Anwar on Nalla’s case.
* 11.55am: A four-wheel drive vehicle carrying Anwar’s and his family’s belongings leaves the residence and heads for Anwar’s own house at Bukit Damansara.
* 12.15pm: Umno Youth chief Datuk Ahmad Zahid Hamidi goes into Anwar’s residence.
* 2.35pm: Zahid with Umno Youth secretary Saifuddin Nasution Ismail drive out of Anwar’s house.
* 2.57pm: A Mercedes Benz believed to be driven by Anwar’s father leaves the house.
* 3pm: Anwar moves out of the house with his wife and children in a four-wheel drive vehicle after telling reporters that he will hold a press conference at his Bukit Damansara home. Halfway, his entourage passes the Prime Minister’s entourage of cars, which was heading for the city.
* 3.08pm: Anwar denies allegations in the affidavit and tells a press conference at his house that there is a political conspiracy against him at the highest level.
* 4.25pm: Minister in PM’s Department Datuk Dr Ibrahim Saad, Umno Youth chief Zahid Hamidi, PAS president Fadzil Noor, are seen with Anwar in the house.
* 5.05pm: Manjeet Singh arrives at Anwar’s house in a Mercedes Benz. He leaves 40 minutes later.
* 6.05pm: Two Astro technicians arrive to install a satellite dish.
* 7.15pm: Anwar goes live on CNBC in a telephone interview, saying that he hopes for the best but is prepared for the worst. Some 50 Anwar supporters, including former Deputy Health Minister Datuk Farid Ariffin watch the broadcast in the living room.
* 7.25pm: Anwar concludes the CNBC interview, comes downstairs and hugs Farid. They then perform the maghrib prayers.
* 7.35pm: Anwar holds discussions with supporters.
* 8.07pm: Dr Mahathir arrives at PWTC to chair the Umno Supreme Council meeting. Present at PWTC are some 500 Umno supporters.
* 8.15pm: Anwar leaves his home in a Pajero heading for PWTC. His wife and two aides accompany him.
* 8.30pm: Anwar arrives to cheers.
* 8.45pm: Dr Mahathir chairs Umno supreme council meeting.
* 10.20pm: Anwar’s supporters who number 1,000 start chanting and singing.
* 10.30pm: Anwar’s supporters distribute two private and confidential letters from Anwar to the Prime Minister dated Aug 25 and Aug 28 defending himself against all allegations.

More comments:

* Anwar expelled from UMNO during Supreme Exco meeting at PWTC. A few ministers were jeered when they made their way to PWTC, including Daim Zainuddin, Sabaruddin Chik and Najib Tun Razak. When Dr Mahathir emerged at 1.30 am (Friday morning), he was booed, jeered and pelted with plastic bottles and cans. Apparently, Zahid also raised his hand during the “consensus”. He was asked a few times whether he’s sure, and he said yes. “Sources close to Dato Zahid” explains that the so called consensus decision of the UMNO supreme council to expel Anwar never was a consensus. The meeting began with Mahathir simply saying that Anwar is a womanizer and must be expelled. He said that Sanusi Junid, Megat Junid and Daim showed him all the evidence. The “evidence” was the in form of prostitutes and transvetites brougth to see him. Anwar then swore in the name of Allah that he never commited any of the sexual misconducts and that he will not resign. The attack on Anwar was then lead by Ibrahim Ali and Sulaiman Mohd. Four members stood to defend Anwar. They were Dato Khalid Yunus, Dato’ Ibrahim Saad, Dato Afifuddin Omar and Dato’ Zahid Hamidi. Zahid objected because Mahathir was basically making the Supreme Council into a court where he himself is the police, judge, prosecutor and executioner. Mahathir continued rambling that Anwar is immoral and must be expelled. Mahathir insisted and the other Supreme Council members played along with him. He then announced to the media the so call “unanimous decision”. No show cause letter was ever issued to Anwar, no discplinary proceeding was initiated and he was just summarily dismissed.
* Electric supply to Anwar’s former official resident was cut off the very night he was expelled.

4th September (Friday)

* 12.35am: Anwar emerges from meeting and tells his supporters that he has been sacked. He vows to fight against all the charges levelled at him.
* 12.45am: Anwar leaves PWTC to shouts of Hidup Anwar.
* 12.50am: Datuk Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad tells a press conference that the supreme council has decided to expel Anwar from the party.
* 1am: Supreme Council members start leaving.
* 1.05am: Dr Mahathir walks out. Crowd gets unruly and starts hurling objects in his direction. He is escorted by his bodyguards and driven away. The crowd continues shouting.
* Afternoon: Anwar performed Friday prayers at the Bukit Damansara mosque. He gave a speech after the prayers and the congregation was shouting “Allahuakbar”. They then carried him around the compound. Even the non-Malays in the surrounding offices came out to cheer him and shouted their support for him.
* Evening: According to one eyewitness who went to Anwar’s personal residence this evening, the following persons were there giving support and speeches: Chandra Muzafar, Samad Ismail, YB Ruhani Ahmad (Chairman of MARA and leader of the govt backbenchers club), Marina Yusoff, Dato Idris Jusoh, Dato Khalid Ibrahim (chairman of Guthrie), Prof Syed Naqib Al Attas, Dato Zahid Hamidi (there most of the time).

5th September

* Officially launches reform movement to “stand firm for justice, fight corruption and cronyism”.
* Several state governments have directed religious leaders not to allow mosques to be used for political purposes.

6th September

* Anwar cancels planned nationwide tour at last minute, due to fear of a backlash from the police.
* The New Straits Times quoted the country’s deputy police chief Norian Mai as confirming the arrest of Anwar’s adopted brother Siukam Sukma Darmawam, a businessman based in Kuala Lumpur.

7th September

* Anwar announces 2nd plan to go on nationwide tour. Scheduled to begin on 9th, 2 days before start of Commonwealth Games. Zahid pressured by some of his members to resign.
* Mahathir appoints Mustapa Mohamad, Entrepreneur Development Minister as Second Finance Minister with immediate effect. Mahathir will be First Finance Minister. Mustapa will continue to handle his current ministerial position, Bernama added. Some people are not pleased with this choice because allegedly, he made a mess while in charge of MARA.
* Mahathir gives official reason for Anwar’s sacking as: “doubts on his moral and personal integrity”.

8th September

Anwar cancels plans for a nationwide tour for the second time and will instead receive supporters at his home in the capital.

20th September

* Anwar arrested under ISA at 8.30pm at his home

21th September

* Zahid arrested under ISA at Kota Kinabalu
* Kamaruddin Mohd Nor detained under ISA

28th September

* Tian Chua arrested (from the Voice of the Malaysian People rights group, who chairs the Coalition for People’s Democracy)

28th September

* Sukma and Dr Munawar file appeal

29th September

* After 10 days in detention, Anwar finally emerges with a black eye and injured hand at the sessions court. His case is referred to the High Court and bail request was denied.

30th September

* Umno Youth Chief Zahid released from ISA, as well as 4 leaders of ABIM.
* Dr Mahathir hints that Anwar’s injuries in detention may be self-inflicted

2nd October

* Zahid announces his resignation as Umno Youth Chief. “The decision to resign is not due to any particular party or UMNO leader,” he told a news conference. “It is due to the realisation of the importance of party unity and the sacrifice I had to make as leader of the youth wing.”

“As a leader with responsibility, I thought resigning was something I had to do,” he said. “I will continue to work for the party as a member and I will remain in UMNO. I hope my descision is respected by all parties.” (source: AFP)

3rd October

* Kamaruddin Mohd Nor released from ISA detention
* Seven Malaysian women’s groups protests against alleged police violence and in support of Anwar and his associates who have been detained without trial. The groups are All Women’s Action Society, the Partners of Community Organisation, Sabah Women’s Resource Group, Women’s Development Collective, Tenaganita, the Women’s Friendship Association and the women’s wing of the committee in support of city exploration.

4th October

* Anwar taken to University Hospital for medical checkup

Source: Website - Post Title: Flashback: Chronology of Events leading to Anwar Ibrahim’s sacking on 2nd September 1998


Friday, March 27, 2009

If you do not want Najib as PM - off your lights at 8:30 pm, Saturday(28/3/2009)...mmm

A friend of mine just told me that we will be having a national referendum of sorts - i.e. to get the Malaysian public to indicate whether they want Mohd Najib Razak as the next Prime Minister of Malaysia..

If we do not want him as the next Prime Minister - then we are supposed to off our lights at 8.30pm this Saturday (28/3/2009) , whereby Saturday being the last day of that UMNO General Assembly that made him the President of UMNO - as such, by convention possibly the next Prime Minister...

Interesting and creative means of doing a referendum....mmm

Off your lights - if you do not want Najib as the next PM..

Keep your lights on if you want Najib as the next PM...

Anyway, Najib can only become Prime Minister if the current PM resigns,

AND Najib can show that he enjoys the confidence of the majority of them MPs (see earlier posts:- Golden Opportunity if Pak Lah Resigns - MPs can determine new PM - Anwar? Najib? Kit Siang?

AND the King appoints him as the PM...

MALAYSIA is certainly more humane - Rights and Justice are important for us

No politicians...including former human rights activist is today going to come out and champion for justice and human rights of foreign workers - after all they are not the ones who will be voting in the MPs and the ADUNs.

The Foreign Worker First Out policy and practice is unconstitutional, as it goes against Article 8 of the Federal Constitution that guarantees equality. Article 8 (1) provides that 'All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law...'. There is no exception that would allow the discrimination of a person based on whether he is a citizen or a foreigner. There is also no exception that allows for discrimination in the area of employment in the private sector. [see earlier posting:-Malaysia's 'Foreign Workers First Out'(FWFO) principle is unconstitutional and discriminatory. See also the Joint Media Statement that have been endorsed by Malaysia's ‘Foreign Workers First Out’(FWFO) Policy is UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY and UNCONSTITUTIONAL

So, who will champion the rights of these 'foreigners' - more so during this period of financial crisis.

'My political future will be jeopardized if I am seen taking the side of foreign workers at this period...." says the Malaysian politician.

Some may even say - let us just propose an amendment of our Federal Constitution to allow discrimination based on whether one is a citizen or not, especially in matters of private employment.

We should be concern about all human persons - irrespective of their nationality, ethnicity, religion, gender, etc.

Our concern must be Equal Rights and Justice for All..

An official guideline for employers to retrench their foreign workers ahead of local employees has alarmed civil society groups who fear that migrant workers could be sent home with inadequate compensation.
MCPX
Worries about retrenchment and unemployment have been mounting as Malaysia sinks into a recession, its export-oriented economy taking a hit from a slump in global consumer demand.

In the last quarter of 2008, the economy grew by just 0.1 percent and many fear the economy will shrink this year despite a huge RM60 billion government stimulus package.

In January, exports dropped by 28 percent and the number of workers employed by the manufacturing sector fell by nine percent against the previous year.

bangladesh foreign workers migrants 030108Thousands have been retrenched in the last few months. Labour Department statistics for the month of January alone show 4,325 workers retrenched of which 2,153 were local and 2,172 foreign. These of course are only reported figures.

The steady rate of retrenchments has worried the government, which has announced a principle of foreign workers first out (FWFO), meaning that employers should lay off foreign workers before they retrench locals.

Even the country's trade union movement is worried about the influx of migrant workers at a time when retrenchments are rising.

The issue came under the spotlight when the Bangladeshi labour counsellor said that 70,000 workers from that South Asian country with approved visas would be arriving soon to take up jobs in the plantation, construction and services sectors.

A senior official of the Malaysian Trades Union Congress pointed out that thousands of Bangladeshi workers were experiencing employment uncertainty. He said it would be better to revoke their visas while they were still in their country, instead of landing here and becoming unemployed or under-employed.

Don't exaggerate it

But activists point out that many of the foreign workers in Malaysia have paid small fortunes to agents in their home countries to work in Malaysia. Most of the foreign workers in the country are from Indonesia, Bangladesh, India, Burma, Vietnam, Nepal and the Philippines.

They are lured here by foreign recruitment agents or representative of the more than 250 registered outsourcing countries operating in Malaysia.

If visas are cancelled, foreign workers are unlikely to obtain refunds from the agents. Bangladeshi and Indian workers, for instance, have to raise or borrow around RM8,000 to RM10,000 to pay for agents fees and other charges.

Employment agreements are usually for a period of three years while work permits have to be renewed annually.

foreign workers 201107But the government has reportedly slashed its work permit approvals by over 70 percent this year. It has also approved a proposal to double the foreign workers' levy imposed on employers to discourage the hiring of foreign workers.

Activists worry that employers could pass down these higher charges for their foreign workers to absorb. In the case of restaurant owners, this could reportedly amount to RM3,600 per worker. Employers could also be tempted to hire undocumented workers due to the higher levies.

Foreign workers usually have to work one or two years before they can recover what they incurred - or repay the loans they took - in their home countries. If they are sent back earlier, they could well find themselves in debt upon their return home.

Indonesia has expressed fears that some 100,000 of the two million Indonesian workers in Malaysia could be retrenched as companies here shed workers.

"This has not yet happened, so don't exaggerate it," outgoing Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was quoted as saying in the Indonesian media during a two-day visit to Indonesia this week. "And if it ever happens, it will not only happen to migrant workers but also to Malaysians."

It is inhumane

In a joint statement, fifty civil society groups from South and South-east Asia endorsed a statement, pointing out it would be a great injustice if Malaysian employers were allowed to prematurely terminate their foreign workers' employment agreements and send them back home.

Early termination of their employment agreements means they would usually end up in a worse condition than when they first entered into the agreement.

''This is a great injustice, and it is inhumane,'' said the statement. ''If there is going to be early termination of employment agreements which are for a minimum fixed period of employment, then the worker must be paid adequate compensation, at the very least basic wages for the remaining duration of their employment agreement.''

frozen seafood industry protest hong san workers penang 171208 01Paying migrant workers the usual termination benefits that Malaysian workers are entitled to - calculated based on the number of years in service - would not be fair either in view of the huge costs the foreign workers incurred in arriving in Malaysia.

Before they send back anybody, the employers should pay what they owe the workers, says Ruth Paul, the coordinator of the Foreign Workers Service Centre on mainland Penang.

''These workers don't have (statutory) retrenchment benefits; so if, say, they have a year remaining on their contract, the employers could pay their outstanding wages (for the remaining period) plus the cost of flight tickets,'' Paul said.

She mentioned a couple of cases in the city of Ipoh recently, where migrant workers were sent back home without their wages because the company was shutting down.

Paul also fears that some employers might just shut down their factories without adequately compensating their migrant workers, leaving them in a lurch.

In the past, she had encountered cases where the employers, who had held on to their workers' passports, suddenly disappeared and could not be contacted. ''The only thing I tell them is to make a police report and contact their embassy.''

Human rights lawyer and blogger Charles Hector suggests that a new policy could be adopted: if a migrant worker has been retrenched, and if he or she has worked less than three years in Malaysia, a new amended work permit could be given to allow the worker to be employed in another sector that needs workers.

''They may be non-citizens, but they are workers and human beings, and they need to be treated as such,'' he wrote in his blog. ''The government needs to develop just policies and principles.'' -IPS - Malaysiakini, 27/3/2009, Gov't to bosses: Hit foreign workers first






Thursday, March 26, 2009

Why so bothered about UMNO? It may no longer be the party of the majority of Malays in Malaysia.

Why are we so bothered about UMNO - United Malay National Organisation, a Malay ethnic political party?

After all, we all know that most Malays today do not anymore support UMNO - their support is now with PAS, PKR , DAP...

How many members do UMNO have really? Some say, once you register as an UMNO member, you never lose your membership even if you do not pay your annual subscription. Even when you die, your name remains in the rolls. How many members? I know UMNO tries to give the impression that it has millions of members - but really how many active members who pay their own annual subscription does UMNO have.

By the way is UMNO members all Muslims? Are they all Malays?

Well, how many Malays are there in Malaysia? Interesting question but very difficult to get the real answer.

Nowadays, they talk only about Bumiputras - and that is Malays plus the natives of Sabah plus the natives of Sarawak plus maybe the 'Indian Muslims of Penang' plus maybe the Eurasian community plus maybe the Thai Malaysians.. well, I really do not know & sadly my quest for this information gave me no definite answers

Number of Malays in Malaysia - CIA World Factbook says
'Malay 50.4%, Chinese 23.7%, indigenous 11%, Indian 7.1%, others 7.8% (2004 est.) - CIA World Factbook
And with regard to religion, the CIA World factbook says:-
Muslim 60.4%, Buddhist 19.2%, Christian 9.1%, Hindu 6.3%, Confucianism, Taoism, other traditional Chinese religions 2.6%, other or unknown 1.5%, none 0.8% (2000 census) - CIA World Factbook, Malaysia
A government census in the year 2005 - showed that with regard to religions practiced in the country (Information obtained from a paper/presentation by Yayasan Kepimpinan & Strategi Malaysia)
Muslim - 57%
Buddhism - 23%
Christianity - 11%
Hinduism - 6%
Confucianism/Taoism/Traditional Religions/Others - 3%
Note that about 50.10% of Other than Malay Bumiputras are Christians, and only about 36.3% are Muslim.

Now since GE2008, UMNO has clearly lost the support of the majority of Malays to PAS and PKR and other Opposition parties, and so what percentage of Malays do UMNO represent today? 10%? 20%? 40%? maybe just 50%...

And are the Malays in UMNO true supporters of UMNO, its principles and values - or are they there just for the 'contracts' and the other 'opportunities/gifts/benefits'?

UMNO tries to propagate the myth that it is VERY strong ...and has the support of the MAJORITY of Malays...etc but really, it is time for us to wake up and realize that UMNO is just another political party - an archaic party - that is about to lie dawn and die, and may be no more come the next General Elections. Media and the 'past' is used extensively to propagate the idea that UMNO is bigger and more important than it really is...That is why...the UMNO assembly is made to be 'BIG' news - and not just the main assembly but also those of its various wings - Wanita (Women), Pemuda(Youth-Male), Puteri (Younger Women) ....and what happened to the Putera (the younger men).

UMNO is really so old-fashioned - and is not only divided by gender - but also age group.

Only the older men will be leaders of the Party.

So, no woman will be President of UMNO - and no woman will be PM of Malaysia. (Hello - we have already had women Prime Ministers/Presidents in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Philippines, - but not in Malaysia)

Which is the party that has the support of the majority of Malays? PAS...PKR....or UMNO. What do you think?



Is Khairy's victory an indication that majority in UMNO do not support Najib?

The defeat of Mukriz Mahathir was unexpected...but is it also indicative of the support that Mohd Najib Razak really has within UMNO...

I do not believe that Khairy won because the members support him - but rather he won because many of the members are not at all happy with Mohd Najib Razak, and they showed it by supporting Khairy

Of course the money/gifts that members received could have also been a factor - and this is based on the fact that UMNO Disciplinary committee did find Khairy 'GUILTY'...Mukriz was maybe just trying to rely on his goodness, his values, his personality, etc...
What are some of the political implications of Khairy’s improbable victory?

The first and most immediate implication has to do with Najib’s power and influence within Umno. If the ‘signal’ which was sent by Najib was not sufficient to ‘kill off’ Khairy’s chances to become the next Umno Youth chief, one has to wonder if the suspension of Mohd Ali Rustam is sufficient to pave the way for Muhyiddin Yassin to win the post of Umno deputy president and hence become the next DPM of Malaysia. We will find out within the next 12 hours. - Malaysiakini, 26/3/2009,
How Khairy managed the impossible

With regard to nominations, it was Mukriz Mahathir (74 nominations), Mohd Khir Toyo (62 nominations) and Khairy Jamaluddin (53 nominations)

But when it came to votes, it was the reverse with Mukriz Mahathir receiving the least of the votes, Khairy Jamaluddin polled 304 votes, enough to defeat Khir (252 votes) and Mukhriz (232 votes).

Mukriz Mahathir can reasonably be said to have been the choice of Mohd Najib Razak, and his cousin Hishammuddin Hussein, and in fact his allegiance started being expressed immediately after GE2008...

Umno Youth executive committee member Mukhriz Mahathir said he would support deputy president Najib Abdul Razak should he challenge Abdullah Ahmad Badawi for the party presidency. - Malaysiakini, 1/4/2008, Mukhriz backs Najib as PM

Asked if he would contest the Umno Youth chief’s post, he said this will depend on the decision of incumbent Hishammuddin Hussein.

mahathir khir toyo kmu forum 010408 03“I’ve not made that decision. Of course, I will have to consult my boss (Hishammuddin) to decide and announce where he will go next.”
- Malaysiakini, 1/4/2008, Mukhriz backs Najib as PM

MCPX






His father and former Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, who also now seems to be supporting Najib for PM (but conditionally)...and Muhyiddin for DPM (or Deputy President of UMNO).
“One of the candidates couldn’t write in English, he couldn’t speak English and therefore (that was why) he did something wrong in Australia because he could not understand English. My choice is Muhyiddin (Yassin).”
MCPX

Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad made this sarcasm-tinged comments when asked by a reporter as to who he would endorse as the country’s new number 2 once current Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak takes over the country....“It is important for the party that only personalities 'beyond any suspicion' are in the leadership line-up,” he told a press conference at his KLCC office this afternoon.

He said it was important for Umno members to be aware that Umno had already been rejected by the people as reflected in its poor performance in the March 8 polls last year.

mahathir and rais yatim pc 190309 01“This is caused by widespread public perception that Umno is a party with corrupt leadership and therefore members must elect clean leaders in the party polls next week in order to restore public confidence in the party.

And for him, Muhd Taib who was arrested in 1996 for carrying RM2.4 million in cash in Australia is seen by the public as a corrupt person and does not exactly fit in the ‘clean character’ bill. - Malaysiakini, 19/3/2009, Dr M endorses Muhyiddin as DPM

Mahathir certainly does not support the corrupt - and let us not forget that Khairy was found 'guilty' - but was left off with only a warning.
Meanwhile, former Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo has been cleared of all charges while Umno Youth deputy chief Khairy Jamaluddin was found guilty but let off with a warning. - New Straits Times, 17/3/2009, Ali Rustam out of Umno deputy presidency contest
Was the victory of Khairy by reason of support for Khairy - or was it really an anti-Najib vote? I believe that it is the latter, taking into consideration the nominations that he got.

The 'barring' of Mohd Ali Rustam from contesting could have been the 'last straw' for some - a 'wake-up call' that Najib must be stopped, and if not 'checked'.

Muhyiddin Yassin, who many believed was the preferred choice of Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to be the Deputy Prime Minister - was certainly not a 'close pal' of Mohd Najib Razak.

But alas, he fumbled when he chose not to offer himself as a candidate for Presidency - settled to contest for just the Deputy Presidency.

Over the months, Muhyiddin has become more and more pathetic. He has been voicing support for Najib - and how he will make a good deputy...how he will be a 'loyal follower' and support Najib's plans and vision....blah..blah. Unfortunately, Najib has been silent..

Some say that Muhyiddin should have been like Shahrizat Abdul Jalil - and gone ahead to offer himself as the Presidential candidate. But then, not a single division nominated him as a candidate for the post of President...

At the end of the day, in fact the members nominated 2 other persons to challenge him for even the post of Deputy President - and then the Disciplinary Committee, a few days before election, barred one from contesting.

So, his only challenge is now with a former Selangor MB, who, I believe, is also not an MP now, i.e. Mohd Taib (a.k.a. Mike Tyson..)...

Mohd Ali Rustam (now 'barred' from contesting) would have been a more real challenge.

If Muhyiddin wins with a small majority or if he loses, then maybe it would be an indication of what people feel about Najib (or maybe the race to monitor is the vice-president race, where Najib's cousin and former UMNO Youth Chief, Hishammuddin Hussein Onn, is contesting..)

Muhyiddin had his window of opportunity...and he missed it. Now, even if he wins, his political future may not be that bright...
"I have been able to cooperate all along. He knows my style, and I know his. If you ask me, we can cooperate. People say we complement each other.

"No leaders are alike but the ambition and spirit of struggle are one. That's important.

"The direction is the same, the vision is the same, the style different. Datuk Seri Najib is more handsome than I, he is younger than I. It's okay. There is no problem."
Muhyiddin said he hoped all quarters would not be influenced by claims that it was unnecessary for Umno to elect someone outspoken to a post below that of party president.

"Of importance is establishing a strong leadership.

"Two strong heads are better than one strong head or 10 heads because the problems we face are complex.

"It is one thing to handle political problems, it is another to handle economic problems.

"The economic issue will grow into a critical issue and this can add or reduce our political dividends.

"If we are not prudent in managing the economy we will lose out in terms of dividends. We need wisdom in managing the economy in a recession."

When asked what he would do first if he wins the Umno deputy president contest, Muhyiddin said: "Firstly, God willing if I win, I have to realise that I am not the No. 1, that I am the No. 2.

"I have always looked back at the history of Umno, that when you are No. 2 you have to act as the No. 2 and not as the No. 1. That is dangerous.

"When people ask about the vision, I say it is not my vision. It is his vision which I am aiding. The No. 2 man must behave as the No. 2, feel as the No. 2 and speak as the No. 2. I am very aware of the fact and I have to behave."

He said party members and the people would observe whether the No. 1 and No. 2 could work together and there would be various pro and contra views and, as such if elected, he would play any role given to him by the No. 1.- New Straits Times, 21/3/2009,
Muhyiddin: Najib and I complement each other

At the end of the day, we will really never know whether the membership of UMNO supports Najib Razak as President - as they never had the chance to vote for him, and the present quota system when it comes to nominations makes it very unlikely for there to be any contest when it comes to the post of President of UMNO...

The victory of Khairy indicates that Najib, who may have had support before, has now lost it...

Hence, again I reiterate that when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi resigns - it will be important to really be sure that Mohd Najib Razak has the support of the majority in the Dewan Rakyat. We cannot assume that all BN MPs...or all UMNO MPs want Najib to be the next Prime Minister.

Maybe, the majority in BN (UMNO) may want Khairy Jamaluddin to be the next Prime Minister...or maybe even Muhyiddin to be the Prime Minister...

Then, Najib, as President of UMNO, can really focus his attention in re-building UMNO and its image in preparation for the next General Elections which may end the UMNO led-BN rule of Malaysia.


Wednesday, March 25, 2009

RM10,629-99 expended to come to Malaysia - an early return is just not right ...or just

Well, I would like to share with you an Editorial in the Daily Star dated 25/3/2009, which carried the joint statement of 59 organisations entitled ' Malaysia's ‘Foreign Workers First Out’(FWFO) Policy is UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY and UNCONSTITUTIONAL

It says that "...A worker from Bangladesh spends no less than Tk. 2,00,000 on making his trip to Kuala Lumpur...", and this is about RM10,629-99. So, is it fair to suddenly terminate the worker's contract after 6 months, 1 year or even 2 years. Remember that most workers come over to Malaysia based on an agreement (and a representation) that they will be working for at least 3 years (and that further extension will most likely be there for another 2 or more years..).

A worker in Bangladesh is not a fool to expend so much and risk so much just to come over to Malaysia to work for a short period...at a low pay.

Sadly, Malaysian employers (some of them, at least) even go and deduct all their other expenses from these worker's wages. Employer pays the levy to bring in a foreign worker - but alas some employer wrongly deduct this back from the worher's wages...

Live rates at 2009.03.25 10:20:09 UTC

200,000.00 BDT

=

10,629.99 MYR

Bangladesh Taka Malaysia Ringgits
1 BDT = 0.0531500 MYR 1 MYR = 18.8147 BDT



Editorial

In defence of migrant workers

Time to mull global regulatory mechanism is here

FIFTY civil society groups straddling South and South-east Asia have come to the defence of hapless migrant workers, especially in Malaysia. The move reflects the urgency of the situation in which these workers, a very big group of which comes from Bangladesh, find themselves at present. The points which the civil society groups have raised certainly make much sense since they are aimed at cushioning the pain that migrant workers go through when they are informed suddenly that they cannot work any more. In these past many weeks and months, thousands of workers from Bangladesh have had to bear the brunt of the arbitrary moves made by the Malaysian authorities. The latest has been the cancellation of work visas issued to 55,000 Bangladeshi workers even before they could travel to Kuala Lumpur. Making matters worse was the plight of hundreds of others stranded at the airport in the Malaysian capital because they were not being allowed entry.

We agree with the contents of the joint statement issued by the civil society groups, and commend them for it, because they mirror the severe difficulties retrenched workers will face if they are not given adequate compensation by the firms that hire them in Malaysia. The bigger point here is that a contract is a binding agreement that must not be violated with impunity. But when hiring companies in Malaysia take it upon themselves to terminate contracts and tell migrant workers to go home after they have worked for two of the three years they were supposed to, they do not take workers' problems into consideration. That is a wrong approach, for it smacks of exploitation of the helpless and a certain cavalier attitude in dealing with poverty-stricken foreign labourers. While we acknowledge the difficulties that employers may be facing, we also think that when they dismiss workers, they should ensure that these workers go back home with adequate compensation in hand. A worker from Bangladesh spends no less than Tk. 2,00,000 on making his trip to Kuala Lumpur. He has invested a huge amount of money; he is in debt and expects to repay it through his remittances. It is these issues that must be looked into. Migrant workers must not be treated in the same way as local workers when it comes to compensating the affected.

Finally, we believe the time has now come for some serious new thinking into the dilemma all too often faced by migrant workers in different countries. The possibility of an international regulatory mechanism geared to a defence of the interests of the employers and especially of the migrant workers coming into operation ought to be looked into. The arbitrariness of governments needs to be replaced by a system that will be more humane where the rights of such workers are the issue. Perhaps the ILO could be involved. - Daily Star, 25/3/2009, EDITORIAL - In defence of migrant workers, Time to mull global regulatory mechanism is here

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Don't call them 'illegal migrants' - call them undocumented migrants.

Illegal migrants - this is not right for there can be no human being that is illegal.

The correct...progressive phrase to use is 'undocumented migrants' - i.e. referring to migrants whose entry and presence in Malaysia have not been documented in accordance to law. Or maybe their documents that permitted stay is no longer valid. Or maybe, they just do not have any documents...

Their entry...or maybe their continued presence may be against the law - illegal, BUT that cannot make them illegal migrants. They could be migrants that have entered the country illegally, or who have stayed here illegally - but they should never be called illegal migrants.

Let us STOP calling them illegal migrants or immigrants - used the more dignified term, i.e. documented or undocumented migrants/immigrants. The other term used sometimes by the UN and ASEAN is 'irregular migrants', but I still prefer the term 'undocumented migrants'.

The Immigration Department detained 216,373 illegal immigrants from 2005 to 2008, of which 191,583 have been deported.

The largest group of illegals were from Indonesia with 104,026, followed by the Philippines with 32,687, Myanmar with 18,986, Bangladesh with 14,433 and Thailand with 9,481.

“This staggering number shows that there is no effective system in place to send back illegal workers,” said Klang member of parliament Charles Santiago, in a reaction to the answer provided to his written question in parliament on how many illegals were deported.

The DAP lawmaker said that the high incidence of illegal foreign workers will depress wages and called for an “effective exit strategy” to be made available to them.

The incidence of illegal foreigners has been a source of concern, especially in Sabah where it is claimed by opposition politicians that they now outnumber local residents.

The use of foreign labour has also come under criticism for increasing competition with locals for jobs as well as undermining wages as foreign workers are seen as more willing to accept lower pay.

There are an estimated two million foreign workers in Malaysia. The home ministry has set a target of reducing this number to 1.5 million by 2015.

In a recent report, Home Ministry deputy secretary-general Datuk Raja Azahar Raja Abdul Manap said that an average of 250 permits for foreign workers were approved daily for the first two months of this year down drastically from 800 last year.

In an effort to reduce dependency on foreign workers, the government announced in the mini-budget recently that it would double the levy on foreign workers, a move that was widely criticised by some employers who claim that they are unable to find locals who are willing to work in dirty or low paying jobs. - Malaysian Insider, 23/3/2009, Over 200,000 illegals nabbed in past 3 years

Interesting figures, but there must be some more questions asked:-

a) How did these migrants become 'undocumented migrants'?
- Did they come into the country validly with an entry visa, and then were cheated by their agent/employer who did not get them the 'promised' work permit [Pas Lawatan(Kerja Sementara) - PLKS ]
- Did they have a work permit [Pas Lawatan(Kerja Sementara) - PLKS ], and it expired and was not renewed?
- Were they arrested by reason of not having their original passports with them and no employer/agent came forward with the proper pasport and visa - and as such they were classified 'undocumented' and deported?
- Are they really asylum seekers and refugees, which Malaysia may not want to openly recognize as they come from some ASEAN member country, and Malaysia really do not not want to jeopardize its relationship with that ASEAN country?

b) How many of these migrants were charged in court - and how many were not? Why the differential treatment?

c) How many of these migrants were 'whipped' before they were deported?

d) How many months did they spend in Detention Centres before being deported?

e) Why 191,583 out of 216,373 were deported? What happened to the rest?

f) Were the employers of these 216,373 undocumented migrants identified and action taken against these employers? How many of these employers were charged? [Unfortunately, very few employers are investigated...let alone charged, and as such they will again employ undocumented workers for very very low wages...Many arrested undocumented migrants gets 'whipped' before being deported - and errant employers are not even investigated...let alone charged...or tried...or convicted?]

g) How much money was expended for the detention and deportation? Who paid for this? Was the money recovered from those who employed these migrants? Or from those who brought these migrants into Malaysia?

Maybe, it is time we change our way of doing things...

Rather than arresting, detaining...and deporting, maybe we should just document and register them as migrant workers. As they are already in the country, it will save the potential employer much money as the employer will not be required to pay the incoming airfare and cost, etc..

Maybe, we should also allow potential workers to enter the country with social visit passes, and seek employment here. If they find employment within 30 days, then their employer must immediately register them as workers, and the said worker will be issued a work visa. If they cannot find work within 30 days, then they will have to leave ...or maybe apply to extend their visa. This is done in neighbouring Thailand...

For asylum seekers and refugees, who really escaped their home country 'illegally' and are many a times here in Malaysia without any documentations, maybe compassionate caring Malaysia can accord them special 'asylum seeker or refugee status' and allow them to also work in Malaysia. [There may be more than 500,000 'asylum seekers and refugees' in Malaysia coming mainly from Burma, Southern Thailand, Southern Philippines, Aceh (maybe no more or less), ...]

No human being is illegal - and it is wrong to call any human beings...including migrants illegal.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Is Najib's desperation the cause of the suspension without reason of Harakah and SK?


The suspension of PAS's Harakah and PKR's Keadilan for 3 months - with no reasons given is really so undemocratic..

The Home Ministry has suspended the organs of two opposition parties - PAS' Harakah and PKR's Suara Keadilan - for three months, effective immediately.

MCPX
With the suspension, both newspapers will not be able to publish until the end of June, missing out on a number of crucial political events including the three by-elections on April 7. - Malaysiakini, 23/3/2009, Harakah, Suara Keadilan banned 3 months

I saw the letter from Home Ministry that was sent to Wan Azizah, President of PKR, which was dated 23/3/2009, and I see that there was no reasons given for the suspension. [The letter could be seen in Malaysiakini]

It certainly looks like UMNO-BN is really worried - and wants to cut communications between Opposition parties and the people.

The mainstream print-media generally take a pro-UMNO-BN stance, and to get the perspective of the Opposition parties, many usually read the Harakah, and recently also the Suara Keadilan.

What about the internet media? Well, the truth is that many still rely on print media for their information....and the suspension will cause a 'black-out' to the truth (or to the PAS and PKR's version of the truth...) for 3 months, and it will affect the coming by-elections, and more importantly the possible change in the Premiership of Malaysia.

The Prime Ministership cannot be handed over like a baton in a relay race...but that seems to be the way it is going to happen, possibly some time in April. See my earlier posting :-
Golden Opportunity if Pak Lah Resigns - MPs can determine new PM - Anwar? Najib? Kit Siang?

And, remember that the Prime Minister need not be the President of UMNO. Someone else can be the Prime Minister.

There are many, even within UMNO, who do not want Mohd Najib Razak to become the next Prime Minister...

There may be MPs in BN who do not want Mohd Najib Razak to be the PM...

Hence, there should never be the presumption that since BN numbers outnumber the Opposition MPs, that all the BN MPs want Mohd Najib Razak as the next Prime Minister - or that they want the current PM to resign.

Recently, with the preventing of one of the 3 Deputy President candidate contesting, namely one Mohd Ali Rustam, who did manage to get 46 UMNO Division nominations, one wonders about the support that Mohd Najib Razak will still be having. Note that this man had more votes than even Muhyiddin in 2004...
During the 2004 Umno election, Mohd Ali won one of the three vice-president seats when he secured the second highest vote with 1,329 votes behind the former Federal Territories Minister, Tan Sri Isa Abdul Samad (1,507). The other winner was Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin (then Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister) who secured 1,234 votes.

Last November, Mohd Ali received 46 nominations to contest the Umno Deputy President's post, together with Muhyiddin (now International Trade and Industry Ministry), and Rural and Regional Development Minister Tan Sri Muhammad Muhd Taib. -
Bernama, 17/3/2009, Profile Of Mohd Ali Rustam

Would this barring of some candidates, all seemingly not allied with Najib, have an impact on the support of the UMNO MPs in parliament when it comes to choosing the next Prime Minister. See my earlier posting,'Corruption' and Discrimination in UMNO - Has the report to MACC against Ali Rustam (and KJ) been made?

There can be NO assumptions this time around that all BN MPs want Mohd Najib Razak to be the Prime Minister. The determination of whether Mohd Najib Razak has the requisite support of the majority can and should only be made after Abdullah actually resigns.

But will Parliament still be sitting? Or like Perak, will the Yang Di-Pertuan Agung call in MPs, one after the other, to determine who they support to be the next PM. Will Mohd Najib Razak be there in the room when this is done - or will he like Nizar be kept out? If he is on the room, some MPs may be too scared...and may just lie saying that they support Mohd Najib Razak...

Maybe, Mohd Najib Razak should just remain Deputy Prime Minister for some time to come...

The suspending of the alternative print media - the Harakah and the Suara Keadilan, would surely deprive the Malaysian people of views and opinions about very important things that will be happening in Malaysia in the next few months...

The non-giving of reasons is also very unjust and wrong - surely some reasons must be given.

Many persons employed by these publications directly and indirectly, and those who earn a living by distributing/selling, will lose their jobs and/or earnings - and this again is not at all right.

I urge the Malaysian Government, the Home Minister, to immediately revoke this suspension of permits in the name of democracy and justice.

Workers on fixed-term contracts:- HR Ministry fails to provide JUST calculation of benefits when they are retrenched

Today, many employers are using NEW methods to employ workers ...and unfortunately the government has not put in place laws that will protect these workers.

Short-term contracts - Now employers enter into short-term employment contracts with their employees. This could be for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year or maybe even 2 years. There may be promises of renewal but alas, there is no guarantee of renewal - and hence, job security is not there, and workers find it more and more difficult to get new jobs as they get older and gain more experience. What many employers do is not renew these short term contracts after 1 year...or 2 years. Maybe later on, after a month or 2 has passed, they may sometimes hire the same worker back for maybe a different position for another short term.

Using Labour Supply Companies - Again, on record, the employer is the Labour Supply Company (usually some 2 ringgit company with no fixed assets...) - and not the company that uses these workers. Wages are paid by the labour suppliers to the workers - and not by the Company to the workers. These workers also cannot join the unions of the Company, if they exist. Labour supply companies are usually not industry specific - hence workers there also have difficulty even being part of any national union. Employment in Labour Supply companies are also not at all 'permanent' - and even hints of wanting to unionize may invite termination. Further, the fact that workers in Labour Supply companies are placed in different locations for different periods makes 'organizing' workers even more difficult.

Outsourcing Work To Other Smaller Companies - Even Banks in Malaysia have started doing this - and check vetting, internet/phone bankings, etc have been all outsourced. But alas, workers in these 'smaller companies' that do these outsourcing work
are not members of of Union - the NUBE, the National Union of Bank Employees. Bank Employees have been retrenched when banks decide to 'outsource' parts of its work - and with the emphasis on automation (ATMs, etc), internet banking, phone banking - we would be seeing another 30% of bank employees being retrenched in the near future, and this would happen whether global crisis came or did not..

The current provisions in law, as provided for EMPLOYMENT (TERMINATION AND LAY-OFF BENEFITS) REGULATIONS 1980 really will not do any justice for workers who are under these short-term fixed contracts, etc..

To be entitled to termination and lay-off benefits, one must have been working for at least 1 year (12 months),

an employer shall be liable to pay termination or lay-off benefits payment calculated in accordance with regulation 6 to an employee who has been employed under a continuous contract of service for a period of not less than twelve months ending with the relevant date if —

(a) the contract of service of the employee is terminated; or

(b) the employee is laid-off within the meaning of regulation 5.

(2) For the purpose of this regulation a continuous contract of service for a period of not less than twelve months shall include two or more periods of employment which are not less than twelve months in the aggregate if the intervening period or periods between one period of employment and another does not in the aggregate exceed thirty days.- Regulation 3, EMPLOYMENT (TERMINATION AND LAY-OFF BENEFITS) REGULATIONS 1980

and the calculation of termination and lay-off benefits is based on the number of years that one has been working for...
...the amount of termination or lay-off benefits payment to which an employee is entitled in any case shall not be less than —

(a) ten days’ wages for every year of employment under a continuous contract of service with the employer if he has been employed by that employer for a period of less than two years; or

(b) fifteen days’ wages for every year of employment under a continuous contract of service with the employer if he has been employed by that employer for two years or more but less than five years; or

(c) twenty days’ wages for every year of employment under a continuous contract of service with the employer if he has been employed by that employer for five years or more,

and pro-rata as respect an incomplete year, calculated to the nearest month. - Regulation 6(1) EMPLOYMENT (TERMINATION AND LAY-OFF BENEFITS) REGULATIONS 1980

Under the current law, those who have been employed for less than a year will NOT get any termination or lay-off benefits.

When workers were being employed as permanent employees, and generally will be employed until they resign - the 'termination or lay-off benefits' would have been just and fair.

But it certainly will NOT be fair to those being employed under fixed-term employment contracts, and it is proposed that for justice to be done to these workers, the calculation of what they should be paid should be 70% of their basic wages multiply the number of remaining months in their fixed-term contract/agreement.

Why 70%, and not 100%? Because 30% would be roughly the amount of money that they may spend for their food, etc - and this is early termination. [Maybe, they should be given 100% ...]

Some employers may try to terminate the contract alleging worker's breach, etc - and maybe there must be a provision in law, that the employer should be required to deposit the amount due with a HR Ministry Fund pending resolution of any dispute initiated by the worker, etc...

The Human Resource Minister must amend the Employment Act to include this manner of calculation, which shall be the minimum amount that employers must pay their fixed-term contract employees/workers.

The HR Minister must also discourage the practice of using Labour Supply Agencies - maybe these Labour Supply Groups may need to be banned. There must be direct employment of workers by the Company.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody ...Kugan Ananthan,...

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody , passed on 14th March 2009 at the 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur

The Malaysian Bar,

recalling Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:
Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

recalling Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
noting that on 8 July 2008, the Ministry Of Home Affairs reported in Parliament that, based on the Prison Department’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 1535 persons died in prisons, rehabilitation centres and immigration detention camps;

noting that based on the Royal Malaysia Police’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 85 persons died in police custody, while 600 persons died in remand centres for drug addicts;

noting that the victims of custodial deaths are from various ethnic groups;

distressed that on 20 January 2009, Kugan Ananthan, a 22-year old reportedly detained for investigations into car thefts died in police custody;

shocked that the relevant authorities, at first instance, appeared to certify that Kugan Ananthan’s death was not caused by any person criminally concerned;

noting
that the nature of Kugan Ananthan’s death once again raises concerns regarding the treatment of detainees in the custody of law enforcement personnel and the interrogation methods used on detainees;

deeply concerned that custodial deaths continue to occur and erode public confidence in and perception of the Royal Malaysia Police;

1. Strongly calls upon all law enforcement agencies and their personnel to respect, protect and promote the rights of detainees.


2. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately sign and ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, and implement it as domestic legislation.


3. Strongly calls upon the Royal Malaysia Police, the Attorney-General and the Judiciary to cause all custodial deaths to be investigated by inquiries conducted pursuant to Chapter XXXII of the Criminal Procedure Code, and ensuring that all inquiries are conducted expeditiously, transparently and in a meaningful manner.


4. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately advise the King to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate the issue of custodial deaths including, but not limited to, Kugan Ananthan’s case.


5. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately establish the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission and implement all the recommendations of the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police.


The motion was unanimously carried.

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody ...Kugan Ananthan,...

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody , passed on 14th March 2009 at the 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur

The Malaysian Bar,

recalling Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:
Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

recalling Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
noting that on 8 July 2008, the Ministry Of Home Affairs reported in Parliament that, based on the Prison Department’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 1535 persons died in prisons, rehabilitation centres and immigration detention camps;

noting that based on the Royal Malaysia Police’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 85 persons died in police custody, while 600 persons died in remand centres for drug addicts;

noting that the victims of custodial deaths are from various ethnic groups;

distressed that on 20 January 2009, Kugan Ananthan, a 22-year old reportedly detained for investigations into car thefts died in police custody;

shocked that the relevant authorities, at first instance, appeared to certify that Kugan Ananthan’s death was not caused by any person criminally concerned;

noting
that the nature of Kugan Ananthan’s death once again raises concerns regarding the treatment of detainees in the custody of law enforcement personnel and the interrogation methods used on detainees;

deeply concerned that custodial deaths continue to occur and erode public confidence in and perception of the Royal Malaysia Police;

1. Strongly calls upon all law enforcement agencies and their personnel to respect, protect and promote the rights of detainees.


2. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately sign and ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, and implement it as domestic legislation.
3. Strongly calls upon the Royal Malaysia Police, the Attorney-General and the Judiciary to cause all custodial deaths to be investigated by inquiries conducted pursuant to Chapter XXXII of the Criminal Procedure Code, and ensuring that all inquiries are conducted expeditiously, transparently and in a meaningful manner.
4. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately advise the King to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate the issue of custodial deaths including, but not limited to, Kugan Ananthan’s case.


5. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately establish the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission and implement all the recommendations of the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police.


The motion was unanimously carried.

'Corruption' and Discrimination in UMNO - Has the report to MACC against Ali Rustam (and KJ) been made?

Fighting corruption within UMNO, a political party and a registered society, is all well and good but corruption is crime in Malaysia.

Hence, internal party punishment is really not enough - all those whom the party have evidence of involvement in corruption should be reported to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) - and the MACC should investigate, and if sufficient evidence is there, charges should be brought in court.

UMNO punishments are really odd - barred from running for elections, but not suspended as a member, and allowed to continue to hold all existing party positions - and the position of Chief Minister. ( Really odd, is it not....)

Guilty - barred from contesting for some, and others just let off with a stern warning. Wonder whether relationship with the PM had anything to do with that ' found guilty but let off with a warning'

The Umno disciplinary board has barred party vice-president and Malacca Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam from contesting the deputy presidency.

The announcement was made by Umno Disciplinary Board chairman Tengku Ahmd Rithaudeen Ismail at the party headquarters here.

Although Mohd Ali is not allowed to contest in next week's party election, he has not been suspended from the party.

Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has added that Mohd Ali Rustam will continue as Malacca Chief Minister. He said he hoped that Mohd Ali will accept the decision with an open heart, and also urged him to continue contributing to the struggle of the party.

Meanwhile, former Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo has been cleared of all charges while Umno Youth deputy chief Khairy Jamaluddin was found guilty but let off with a warning. - New Straits Times, 17/3/2009,
Ali Rustam out of Umno deputy presidency contest
Guilty but he can keep all his present positions - and even remain as Chief Minisiter...
Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam will keep all his posts, including that of Malacca chief minister, despite being barred from contesting in the party elections at its general assembly from March 24 to 28.
Deputy Prime Minister and Umno deputy president Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Ali was only not allowed to contest the deputy president's post by the party's disciplinary board.

"He can continue to function as the Malacca chief minister. I hope he accepts the board's decision with an open heart. I believe he is a loyal party member who will adhere to the rules and continue to contribute to Umno's struggles," said Najib.

Ali was found guilty of violating party ethics by indulging in money politics.

Asked if the disciplinary board meted punishments to people differently, Najib said the board was independent and not even the party's supreme council could interfere with its decisions. - New Straits Times, 18/3/2009, Election ban won't affect Ali's position as chief minister
So, 'dirty' to the extend of not good enough to stand for UMNO elections - but OK to still remain as Chief Minister.

So, 'dirty' to the extend of not good enough to stand for UMNO elections to contest the position of Deputy President (future) - but OK to still remain as Vice President of UMNO..what nonsence.

And another 'discrimination' - his political secretary and the alleged agents of Ali Rustam was suspended - but not him. What? Why? Agents and staff joust carry out the orders...instructions of the boss, and usually the boss receives the harsher punishment - not the underlings....Differential treatment because you are a 'VIP' member, mmmm

He said that Mohd Ali's political secretary Saadun Basirun and two other agents were found guilty of being involved in vote buying.

No other details were however revealed. Saadun and the other two Mohd Ali's agents were suspended from the party for three years.

Mohd Ali's party membership however was not suspended. - Malaysiakini, 18/3/2009, Ali Rustam to appeal decision
Now, how will the UMNO membership react? Possibly just like all Malaysians - accept it and move on. Remember quite a lot of UMNO Divisions chose to nominate this Ali Rustam to contest the one(1) Deputy President's post in UMNO...we shall see..we shall see..

So, is Ali Rustam happy...and accepted the decision - NOPE ...he is appealing.

Malacca Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam is appealing the Umno Disciplinary Board's decision barring him from contesting for the post of deputy president in the party elections next week.

"The appeal letter will be submitted today," the Umno vice-president told reporters at his residence, Seri Bendahara, here today. - New Straits Times, 18/3/2009 - Ali Rustam to appeal
So, what will the future be?

Will we get another 'split' ...and a new political party? Semangat 46 - when Tengku Razaleigh 'left' UMNO, Parti Keadilan - when Anwar Ibrahim 'left', and now maybe Parti Angkatan Rakyat - when Ali Rustam with his supporters leaves...mmmm.

How many MPs are with Ali Rustam? Would it be enough MPs to ensure that Mohd Najib Razak never becomes PM? [Maybe, we may have a 'Unity Government' ...made up Opposition Parties...and Independents]

How many ADUNs are with Ali Rustam? Maybe more States will fall to the Opposition and the Independents...

Posibilities....yes. But we shall see...we shall see...


Malaysian Bar Resolution on Detention of P Uthayakumar, M Manoharan, ...

Malaysian Bar Resolution on Detention of P Uthayakumar, M Manoharan, R Kengatharan and V Ganabatirau under the ISA , passed on 14th March 2009 at the 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur


(1) Whereas Article 5 of the Federal Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law.
(2) And whereas Article 8 of the Federal Constitution guarantees that all persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.
(3) And whereas Article 8(2) of the Federal Constitution guarantees that except as expressly authorized by this Constitution there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race or descent or place of birth
(4) And whereas Article 10 of the Federal Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, assembly and association.
(5) And whereas Article 11 of the Federal Constitution guarantees freedom of religion.
(6) And whereas Article 12 of the Federal Constitution provides that there shall be no discrimination against any citizen on the grounds of religion, race, descent or place of birth:-
(a) in the administration of any educational institution, maintained by a public authority and in particular the admission of pupils or students or the payment of fees or; and
(b) in providing out of the funds of a public authority financial aid for the maintenance or education of pupils or students in any educational, institution (whether or not maintained by a public authority and whether within or outside the Federation)
(7) And whereas Article 153(1) of the Federal Constitution provides that it shall be the responsibility of the Yang Di Pertuan Agong to safeguard the special position of the Malays and natives of any of the states of Sabah and Sarawak and the legitimate interest of the other communities in accordance with the provision of this Article.
(8) And whereas Article 153(2) provides that the Yang Di Pertuan Agong is to ensure the reservation for Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak of such proportion as he may deem reasonable of positions in the public service and of scholarships, exhibitions and other similar educational or training privileges or special facilities given or accorded by the Federal Government and when any permit or license for the operation of any trade or business is required by Federal law
(9) And whereas Section 42 of the Legal Profession Act 1976 empowers Advocates and Solicitor to represent their client’s interest without fear or favour.
(10) And whereas Article 1 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights stipulates that “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the most widely subscribed body of principles that establishes Universal Human Rights norms and standards.
(11) And whereas the Declaration on the right and responsibility of individuals, groups and organs of society to promote and protect Universally Recognised Human Rights and fundamental freedoms, adopted by consensus by the United Nations General Assembly on the 9th of December 1998 recognises the legitimacy of the activities of human rights defenders their rights to freedom of association and to carry out their activities without fear of reprisals.
(12) In the Harare Commonwealth Declaration 1991, the Heads of Government of the countries of the Commonwealth had reaffirmed the pledge that were set out in a Declaration of Commonwealth Principles agreed to by their predecessors at their meeting in Singapore in 1971 among them being that, they believe in the liberty of the individual under the law in equal rights for all citizens regardless of gender, race, colour, creed or political belief and in the individual’s inalienable right to participate by means of free and democratic political processes in framing the society in which he or she lives. They recognize racial prejudice and intolerance as a dangerous sickness and a threat to health development and racial discrimination as an unmitigated evil. They oppose all forms of racial oppression and they are committed to the principles of human dignity and equality.
(13) And whereas the United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights states in it’s preamble that it developed out of recognition of the fact that “in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the ideals of free human beings enjoying freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone especially the minority may enjoy his economic, social and cultural rights as well as his civil and political rights”.
(14) And whereas Articles 3, 10 and 11(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 provides for no detention without trial, right to personal liberty and a fair trial and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
(15) And whereas the United Nations Convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination, the term racial discrimination shall mean any on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise on an equal footing of human rights and fundamental and any other field or public life.
(16) At the world conference on human rights held in Vienna, Austria in June 1993, Malaysia along with 170 other countries reiterated the universality, indivisibility and interdependence of human rights and commitment to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
(17) And whereas the preamble to the Internal Security Act 1960 starts of by stating “An act to provide for the Internal Security of Malaysia preventive detention, the prevention of subversion, the suppression of organized violence against persons and property in specified areas of Malaysia, and for matters incidental thereto.

“Whereas action has been taken and further action is threatened by a substantial body of persons both inside and outside Malaysia:-

(a)

To cause and to cause a substantial number of citizens to fear organized violence against persons and properly; and
(b)

To procure the alteration otherwise than by lawful means the lawful Government of Malaysia by law established.
(18) And whereas even the drafter of the ISA, the late Professor R.H. Hickling had said that the Internal Security Act (ISA) was only intended against communist insurgents and those bent on armed struggle. In an interview with the New Straits Times (on the 30th day of July 2006) Hickling said the ISA was being used against people for whom it was not intended “it was designed to be more limited in its scope than it is at the moment”. Organised violence is the key to this preamble but a lot of people who had nothing to do with organized violence at all were arrested (and detained under the ISA). “I would want Judicial review at all times”.
(19) And whereas Advocates and Solicitors P. Uthayakumar, M. Manoharan, R.Kengatharan and V.Ganabatirau had at all material times been discharging their duties pursuant to Section 42 of the Legal Profession Act and further to the aforesaid Malaysian Constitution, Laws of Malaysia Commonwealth, United Nations and International laws and obligations in particular in championing the minority, human rights and dignity of the Malaysian Indian community who are suffering from about the worst forms of violations of minority and human rights.
(20) And whereas when P.Uthayakumar had filed a RM100 Million Civil Suit against the aforesaid parties, they had speedily and without even filing their statement of defence filed an application to strike out the Writ of Summons and Statement of claim now denying that they were referring the said terrorist link to P.Uthayakumar. They had further stated that they were merely referring to Hindraf leaders knowing fully well that P.Uthayakumar was the main Hindraf leader.
(21) And whereas these Advocates and Solicitors are still languishing in Malaysia’s very own “Guantanamo Bay” the Kemta Prison without trial and against the rules of natural justice and the rule of law for about one year and three months as at the date hereof despite having pursued their struggle only through legal and peaceful means.
(22) And it is now hereby resolved by the Malaysian Bar that :-
(a) Advocates and Solicitors and activists P. Uthayakumar, M. Manoharan, R.Kengatharan and V.Ganabatirau were at all material times acting without fear or favour through peaceful legal and legitimate means further to the Federal Constitution, Laws of Malaysia, the Commonwealth, United Nations and the International laws, conventions and obligations as aforesaid.
(b) The arrest and detention of Advocates and Socilitors P.Uthayakumar,M.Manoharan, R.Kengatharan and V.Ganabatirau is against the letter and spirit of Article 5 of the Federal Constitution the Internal Security Act 1960, Laws of Malaysia, the Commonwealth, United Nations the International Laws, Conventious and Obligations, rules of natural justice and the rule of law.
(c) Justice has not been done for Advocates and Solicitors P.Uthayakumar, M.Manoharan, R.Kengatharan and V.Ganabatirau who have now been detained and imprisoned without trial for one year and three months now since the 13th day of December 2007 and for an indefinite period of time thereafter.
(d) The Malaysian Bar hereby calls upon the Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Home Minister and the Government of Malaysia to forthwith set free and release from ISA detention the aforesaid P. Uthayakumar, M. Manoharan, R.Kengatharan and V.Ganabatirau.
(e) That all the remaining 43 detainees currently detained under the Internal Security Act 1960 also be forthwith released.
(f) The Malaysian Bar calls for the abolishment of the Internal Security Act 1960 which provides for detention without trial and all other such laws providing for detention without trial with immediate effect.
The amended motion was unanimously carried.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Malaysian Bar Resolution on Detention without Trial laws

Malaysian Bar Resolution on Detention without Trial laws, passed on 14th March 2009 at the 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur


The Malaysian Bar,
affirms that the detention of persons held without trial under laws such as the Internal Security Act 1960, Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 and Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985 is an unjustified infringement of universal principles of human rights, and a violation of the rule of law and the principles of a democratic Government;

affirms that legislation which ousts the jurisdiction of the Courts to review the detention of persons held without trial is a further violation of international human rights law;

taking cognisance of the numerous complaints of torture or of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment inflicted on detainees by law enforcement personnel;

concerned that the said complaints have not been investigated properly and transparently, nor the perpetrators held accountable and prosecuted or disciplined for their actions;

concerned
that the Government appears to sanction the use of unlawful and questionable methods in the interrogation and detention of detainees;

concerned
with the immunity that the Government appears to accord to the perpetrators of torture or of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;

encouraged by the recent landmark judgments of the High Court of Malaya in the cases of Abd Malek Hussin v Borhan Hj Daud & Ors [2008] 1 CLJ 264 delivered by Mr Justice Hishamudin Mohd Yunus and Raja Petra Bin Raja Kamarudin v Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri delivered by Mr Justice Syed Ahmad Helmy Bin Syed Ahmad;

1. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately and unconditionally release all persons presently detained without trial, and where appropriate, to prosecute them in a public and fair trial.


2. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately repeal the Internal Security Act 1960, Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 and Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985.


3. Strongly denounces torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment inflicted on detainees during their interrogation and detention.


4. Strongly calls upon the Government to advise the King to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to conduct a full and open investigation into the complaints of torture or of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment inflicted on detainees by law enforcement personnel.

The motion was unanimously carried.

Malaysian Bar Resolution on indigenous peoples' rights

Malaysian Bar Resolution on indigenous peoples' rights, passed on 14th March 2009 at the 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur

The Malaysian Bar,

taking note that Malaysia is a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council and is obliged to uphold the underlying values of international human rights laws and norms set out in, inter alia, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966;

taking note that Malaysia has ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women 1979 and the Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989, and signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2006 which, inter alia, accords protection for vulnerable groups such as women, children and the disabled in Malaysia;

taking note that Malaysia voted, at both the United Nations Human Rights Council and the United Nations General Assembly, in favour of adopting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2007 that, inter alia, reiterates the right of indigenous peoples to self-determination;

encouraged by the decision of the Court of Appeal in Kerajaan Negeri Selangor & Ors v Sagong Tasi & Ors [2005] 4 CLJ 169, which recognises the right of indigenous peoples in and over their ancestral lands at common law;

encouraged by the recent introduction and establishment by the Perak State Government (under Pakatan Rakyat) of an “Orang Asli Land Rights Task Force”;

deeply concerned that the ancestral lands of indigenous peoples are under constant threat in the name of “development” (as unilaterally defined and understood by the Federal and State Governments without consultation with, nor consent of, indigenous peoples);

deeply concerned that notwithstanding the fiduciary duty of the Federal and State Governments to promote and protect the welfare and rights of indigenous peoples, the latter are instead often coerced into relinquishing their ancestral lands to Government-linked or private enterprises, or under the pretext of integration;

deeply concerned that the Department of Orang Asli Affairs has failed to perform its fiduciary duty to empower indigenous peoples and assist with their welfare, but is instead complicit in the violation of the rights of indigenous peoples;

deeply concerned that the implementation of integration policies causing coerced resettlement of indigenous peoples removes them from their source of livelihood, their physical and spiritual way of life and their economic, social and cultural heritage which have been practised, and have evolved, over centuries;

deeply concerned that the majority of indigenous peoples are not able to fully enjoy their fundamental human rights as their traditions, customs and values are being eroded;

deeply concerned that the relevant authorities, in an attempt to justify their “development” policies and actions to resettle and integrate indigenous peoples, seek to portray indigenous peoples as resistant towards changes that are purportedly for their benefit;

deeply concerned that despite numerous requests and appeals to the relevant authorities, the ancestral lands of indigenous peoples have yet to be fully recognised and protected;

taking note that there is no simple nor single solution to the formal recognition and protection of these ancestral lands, as the problems encountered vary according to place and community;

taking note however that various options are available for the formal recognition and protection of these ancestral lands depending on the needs of the respective indigenous communities, inter alia:

(a)
the issuance of individual land titles to every indigenous family;


(b)
the gazetting of communal land parcels by the State Governments under Section 62 of the National Land Code 1965;


(c)
the gazetting of communal land parcels under the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 with perpetual and unlimited foraging rights extending beyond the gazetted communal land parcels; and


(d)
in exceptional cases of certain semi-nomadic indigenous communities, who are the most vulnerable of indigenous peoples, perpetual and unlimited foraging rights (with concomitant and greater opportunities for education and vocational training towards sustaining their livelihood);

deeply concerned that many indigenous communities still live without basic needs, amenities and infrastructure;

recognising that indigenous peoples are invaluable yet vulnerable communities whose livelihoods, cultures and lands are deserving of our protection;

1.
Strongly calls upon the Federal and State Governments, the Department of Orang Asli Affairs and all public and private enterprises and individuals to respect the rights of indigenous peoples pursuant to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2007, and not to act in any manner inconsistent with those rights.


2.
Strongly calls upon the Federal and State Governments and the Department of Orang Asli Affairs, in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, to take all appropriate measures, including legislative measures, to achieve the spirit and intent of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2007.


3.
Strongly calls upon the Federal and State Governments, the Department of Orang Asli Affairs and all public and private enterprises and individuals to discontinue any “development” (as unilaterally defined and understood by the Federal and State Governments without consultation with, nor consent of, indigenous peoples), deforestation and logging activities on indigenous peoples’ ancestral lands until a process of consultation is conducted with the affected communities, and their free, prior and informed consent and cooperation are obtained.


4.
Strongly calls upon the Federal and State Governments, and the Department of Orang Asli Affairs, to formally recognise, protect and guarantee the right of indigenous in and over their ancestral lands throughout the country and to gazette such ancestral lands as reserved areas for them, and if necessary to amend our land laws to achieve the same. In cases of doubt, a mapping exercise in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples must be carried out.


5.
Strongly calls upon the Federal Government to organise and host a nationwide consultation with indigenous peoples, relevant bodies and interested parties to discuss, design and adopt a holistic programme of action to better the lives of indigenous peoples, including according every indigenous person the full extent of all rights guaranteed under international human rights laws and norms.


6.
Strongly calls for the establishment of an independent “High-Level Task Force on Orang Asli Affairs”, comprising representatives of indigenous communities, the Federal and State Governments, the Department of Orang Asli Affairs, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia, the Attorney-General, non-governmental organisations, human rights groups and the Bar Council, to, inter alia, consider making amendments to the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 consistent with principles of international human rights laws and norms, and to formulate policies and co-ordinate initiatives to better protect the rights of indigenous peoples.


7.
Mandates the Bar Council to take and continue all appropriate and necessary action to implement, assist and empower indigenous peoples in their struggle to promote and protect their rights under international human rights laws and norms.

The motion was unanimously carried.

Monday, March 16, 2009

PR suspended 7 ADUNs, now BN's payback by suspending ...??

No Member of Parliament...and/or ADUN must be suspended for any reason. These are the people's representative - and their right to be and to participate in Parliament or State Legislative Assembly must never be impeded.

This time around - sadly it was the Perak Speaker which started this suspension nonsense. (We note that in past, we had the suspension of Karpal Singh,'...DAP MP for Sandakan Fung Ket Wing in 1984, DAP MP for Batu Gajah Fong Poh Kuan who was suspended for six months without allowance in December 2001 and my[Lim Kit Siang] seven-month suspension in 1992..." (see earlier post, The power to suspend MP/ADUNs must be removed, and)

Now, Gobind may be suspended...
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nazri Abdul Aziz today tabled a motion in Parliament to suspend Puchong member of parliament Gobind Singh for 12 months.

The motion was filed at about 11.30am before Speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia. - Malaysiakini, 16/3/2009
, Motion against Gobind being debated
And suspending an MP/ADUN without allowance and perks is very unjust. Many MPs/ADUNs, who have no side-business or income depend 100% on their salary, allowance and perks - and this is also the money they use to pay rental of the service centres and employ their staff. Deprivation of allowances and perks is so very unjust..

I believe this fear of being suspended without pay also will keep many MPs/ADUNs silent in Parliament and the State Legislative Assembly. If I do not open my mouth, I certainly would not invite 'suspension'....I hope not.

Of course, some MPs and ADUNs may go overboard ....and invite 'suspension', but I hope it is for the right reasons - not merely to get self-publicity...and 'political mileage for oneself'. If the reason is to get 'political mileage' and publicity for a cause, then it is different...and will be acceptable.





Whose permits are being renewed? And whose are not? Contractual obligations must be fulfilled.

When it comes to foreign/migrant workers, it must be noted that these workers do enter into employment agreement/contract with their employers whereby it is usually stipulated the minimum number of years that they will be working in Malaysia for, and the wages and other employment benefits that they will be receiving.

But, alas when it comes to work permits - these are usually issued for the period of 1 year at a time by the Malaysian government (Immigration Department).

If all is well, then these work permits are renewed annually, and employers are able to fulfill their contractual obligations to their workers.

Now, we hear that the Malaysian government is not renewing permits - and that causes some worry. Are employers being prevented from fulfilling their contractual obligations to these migrant workers? This is not at all right.

For many a migrant worker, they need to work for at least 3 years to be able to justify their coming over to Malaysia to work.

If they work 1 year or less, they will be in worse off condition that before they left their home country. They may not even be able to settle the debts incurred, when they chose to come over to Malaysia to work.

If they work for 2 years - they may be able to settle their debts (and, maybe situation may be the same if they had just stayed and worked in their home country)

If they work for 3 years, or more - then they will be better off - and their sacrifices, of being separated from family and friends, and being subjected to difficult living/working conditions, may be justified.

Hence, the non-renewal of work permits is of concern...

Maybe, permits need to be renewed to ensure that the migrant worker at the very least had the opportunity to work 2-3 years.

With regard to termination of workers, by reason of retrenchment - maybe the long accepted principle of "Last In First Out" (LIFO) should be applied, or maybe not when it comes to migrant workers. Certainly, that warped principle knowed as Foreign Workers First Out priciple need to go (see earlier posts : Malaysia's ‘Foreign Workers First Out’(FWFO) Policy is UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY and UNCONSTITUTIONAL)

The termination and lay-off benefits as provided for in our Malaysian laws may not be appropriate or just to migrant workers. In fact, it may also not be just to Malaysian workers, many of whom are no more employed as full time workers - but are employed as very short fixed term contractual workers, or as workers supplied by some sub-contractor.

A new law need to be made that will deal with these 'fixed-term contractual workers' - and maybe their 'termination and lay-off benefits' must be, say 75% of their basic wages times the number of months remaining in their fixed-term (or minimum duration) employment contracts/agreements. 25% is deducted as being roughly the sum one will spend for own meals, etc.

The other policy that may be adopted is that in the event that the migrant worker has been retrenched, then the said migrant (if he has been in employment in Malaysia for less than 3 years), will be given new amended work permits to be able to work with an employer in a sector that still has a need for workers. Maybe, migrant workers with the shortest time in Malaysia shall be the priority.

They may be non-citizens, but they are workers and human beings, and they need to be treated as such. The government needs to develop JUST policies and principles.

The government has slashed its work permit approvals for foreign workers by almost 70 percent so far this year, faced with the twin threat of layoffs and recession.

MCPX

In January and February, an average of 250 permits were approved daily compared to 800 last year, following a more stringent vetting process by the authorities, a Home Ministry official told the Star newspaper.

"Those requesting for foreign labour have to prove that they have made the effort to employ locals," the ministry's senior deputy secretary-general Raja Azahar Raja Abdul Manap was quoted as saying.

"If they can prove it, then they will get the clearance," he said.

A ministry spokesman was not immediately available to confirm the report.

Hiring of new foreign workers banned

In January, Malaysia banned the hiring of new foreigners in the manufacturing and services sectors after a report forecast 45,000 Malaysians would lose their jobs in the next few months.

And last week, the government cancelled work visas issued to 55,000 Bangladeshi workers after unions said the situation for Malaysians was bleak enough without additional foreign manpower being brought in.

Malaysia is one of Asia's largest importers of labour and has an estimated 2.2 million foreign workers, who are the mainstay of the plantation and manufacturing sectors.

However, the government has become concerned about the ramifications of having such a large migrant workforce and periodically tries to reduce it.

- AFP- Malaysiakini, 16/3/2009, Foreign worker permits slashed by 70%



Sunday, March 15, 2009

Malaysia's ‘Foreign Workers First Out’(FWFO) Policy is UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY and UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Media Statement - 14th March 2009

MALAYSIA’S ‘FOREIGN WORKERS FIRST OUT’ POLICY IS UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL

We, the undersigned organizations, groups and networks, concerned about migrant and worker rights, are appalled at Malaysia’s unjust, discriminatory and unconstitutional anti-worker policy, known as ‘Foreign Workers First Out’ (FWFO) policy when it comes to retrenchment.

A recent Malaysian newspaper report read,“…Employers must retrench their foreign workers ahead of their Malaysian staff as they seek to weather the current economic slowdown, said Deputy Human Resource Minister Datuk Noraini Ahmad. She reiterated that employers should adopt the Government’s foreign worker first out (FWFO) principle…”(Star, 28/2/2009 - Retrench foreign workers first, employers told)

Whilst appreciating Malaysia’s concern for its own citizens’ employment, this should never excuse employers from fulfilling their contractual obligations to workers.

It is very wrong for the Malaysian government to compel/encourage employers in Malaysia to retrench their foreign workers first, before the expiration of the agreed duration of employment. Employers should have been fully aware of risks of economic crisis and other business risks, and as such there is no justification whatsoever of their breaching their employment agreements now.

It must also be appreciated that foreign workers do expend lots of monies, incur debts and make great sacrifices when they do decide to come over to Malaysia to work. These workers rely heavily on the representations of the employers and/or their agents especially with regards to wages and the length of period that they will be employed, before deciding to enter into employment agreements and coming over to Malaysia to work.

Employment agreements with migrant workers are usually for a period of 3 to 5 years, and it would be a great injustice if Malaysian employers are now encouraged and permitted to prematurely terminate this employment agreement, and send these foreign workers back to their home country.

Early termination of employment agreements for many a migrant worker means ending up in a far worse condition than when they first entered into employment agreements to come and work in Malaysia. This is a great injustice, and it is inhumane.

If there is going to be early termination of employment agreements which are for a minimum fixed period of employment, then the worker must be paid adequate compensation, at the very least basic wages for the remaining duration of their employment agreement. Usual termination and lay-off benefits paid to local workers will definitely not be just for a foreign migrant worker who is sent back to her country.

We also wish to state that this ‘Foreign Workers First Out’ (FWFO) policy and practice is unconstitutional, as it goes against Article 8 of the Malaysian Federal Constitution, whereby Article 8(1) clearly provides that 'All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law...', and there is nothing in the Constitution that permits discrimination against non-citizens, in favour of citizens, with regard to employment. Therefore, section 60N of the Employment Act 1955, which some use as the basis of FWFO practice is ultra vires the Federal Constitution, and as such is invalid.

We believe that it is better that migrant workers who are now in Malaysia who are or will be prematurely terminated be first used to fill up existing manpower needs, rather that bringing in new migrants.

We call on the Malaysian government to immediately stop this unjust, discriminatory and unconstitutional policy and practice, known as ‘Foreign Workers First Out’ (FWFO) principle.

We call on Malaysia to demand that all employers fulfill their contractual agreements with regard to all workers, including foreign workers. We hope that mechanisms are put in place to ensure that employers pay workers adequate and just compensation for any early termination of employment agreement.

Charles Hector

Pranom Somwong

for and on behalf of the following 47 organisations

ALIRAN, Malaysia

All Nepal Women's Association (ANWA) (Nepal)

Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)

Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants (APMM)

Asia Pacific Forum on Women Law and Development (APWLD)

Bahrain Center for Human Rights

Building and Wood Workers International, Asia Pacific Region (BWI)

CARAM Cambodia

Civil Rights Committee - Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall

(CRC-KLSCAH), Malaysia

Committee for Asian Women (CAW)

Community Development Services (CDS), Colombo, Sri Lanka

Coordination Of Action Research on Aids &Mobility (CARAM-ASIA)

Federation of Trade Unions – Burma (FTUB )

Global Alliance against Traffic in Women (GAATW)

Hope Workers’ Center, Taiwan

IMA Research Foundation Bangladesh

Institute for Migrant Workers (IWORK), Indonesia

International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development (INFID)

Lawyers for Human Rights and Legal Aid (LHRLA) Pakistan

Legal Support for Children and Women (LSCW), Cambodia

MADPET (Malaysians against Death Penalty and Torture)

MAP Foundation for the Health and Knowledge Of Ethnics Labour, Thailand

Messrs Charles Hector, Malaysia

Mindanao Migrants Center for Empowering Actions, Inc. (MMCEAI), Philippines

Migrant CARE (Perhimpunan Indonesia untuk Buruh Migran Berdaulat)

Migrant Services Centre – NWC, Sri Lanka

Multi National Women's Organization of Burma ( MNWOB)

Myanmar Refugee Volunteer Group (MRVG)

National Alliance of Women Human Rights Defenders (NAWHRD), Nepal

Nepal Institute of Development Studies (NIDS)

Network of Action for Migrants in Malaysia (NAMM)

Nijera Kori, Bangaladesh

Ovibashi Karmi Unnayan Program( OKUP), Bangaladesh

Parti Rakyat Malaysia (PRM)

Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor & Wilayah Persekutuan (PERMAS), Malaysia

Raks Thai Foundation, Thailand

Solidaritas Perempuan, Indonesia

Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)

The Action Network for Migrant Workers (ACTFORM), Sri Lanka

The Development Action for Women Network (DAWN), Philippines

The Prevention of HIV/AIDS among Migrant Workers in Thailand

Project (PHAMIT)

Transient Workers Count Too, Singapore

United for Foreign Domestic Workers Rights (UFDWRs)

WARBE Development Foundation, Bangladesh

Writer Alliance for Media Independence (WAMI), Malaysia

Women's Rehabilitation Centre (WOREC), Nepal

Workers Hub 4 Change (WH4C)

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Obama 'murders' another 22 in Pakistan

Obama is President - but nothing seems to have changed.

USA still shows no respect for other nation states...and human life.

The new President taking their army out of Iraq ... but wait, he is sending them to Afghanistan. Sitting safe, protected by Oceans, the US have possibly killed the biggest number of civilians, not its citizens, since World War II.

And these killings are still on-going, but alas with the Media controlled by them, we do not always hear about the wrongs of the US..

Al-Jazeera, a bit more independent, that other news providers, sometimes gives us a glimpse of what are being 'covered up'...

Well - recently another US Drone attack in Pakistan - killing 22 persons (and amongst the dead there may be 'suspected' al-Qaeda fighters). What happened to rule of law? What happened to the right of defence...the right to a fair trial.

We strongly condemn police 'shoot to kill' incidents in Malaysia - and we must be even more angered about these murders perpetrated by Obama - using un-manned planes.

Murder? - ...oh yes, it is. These are planned killing of human persons. It is not accidents.

It was shocking to learn that since Obama became President - there were 5 such attacks...

And since August 2008, there have been about 30 such attacks killing more than 320 human beings..

At least 22 people in Pakistan, including suspected al-Qaeda fighters, have been killed in a missile attack thought to have been carried out by an unmanned US drone.

Security officials said the raid targeted a Taliban camp in northwest Pakistan on Thursday.

Two missiles fired by a drone hit the alleged camp in the tribal area of Kurram, one of seven semi-autonomous regions near Pakistan's border with Afghanistan.

A senior security official, speaking anonymously, said "the training centre was run by local Taliban commander Fazal Saeed and training was under way at the time of the strike".

The Taliban has sealed off the area and was retrieving bodies from the rubble of the building, officials said.

Kurram is a known hub for fighters loyal to Baitullah Mehsud, Pakistan's most wanted man, and Sirajuddin Haqqani, de facto commander of Taliban-aligned groups on the border.

Security officials had earlier said that at least seven fighters had been killed in the attack, including "foreigners" - using a term adopted to mean al-Qaeda operatives.

Repeated strikes

More than 30 such missile attacks have been carried out since August 2008, one month before Asif Ali Zardari was sworn into office as president of Pakistan, killing more than 320 people.

The US military does not confirm drone attacks, but it and the Central Intelligence Agency operating in Afghanistan are the only forces to deploy drones in the region.

It was the fifth missile attack blamed on unmanned US aircraft since Barack Obama, the US president, came to power, dashing the Pakistani public's hopes that the new administration would abandon the policy.

Obama says fighters in Pakistan and Afghanistan, where US troops are battling the Taliban, pose a grave threat.

Islamabad has repeatedly protested to Washington that drones violate its territorial sovereignty and deepen resentment among the 160 million people of the nuclear-armed Islamic nation. - Al-Jazeera, 14/3/2009, Deaths in Pakistan drone strike


Friday, March 13, 2009

PM M'sia on Asylum Seekers : '...be pushed back if they attempt to land...'

How does Malaysia deal with refugees or asylum seekers? Badly - maybe even worse that Thailand's handling of the Rohingyas (see earlier post -Thailand may have caused the death of about 300 Rohingya refugees - Malaysia must act.)

It seems that Malaysia would also possibly do the same, as what was shamefully done by Thailand - that has resulted in hundreds losing their lives. But wait, at least the Thais brought them in, fed them and later put them out to sea - but Malaysia may not even do that.

Malaysia's Prime Minister, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, dealt a severe assault to the image and notion of we, being a caring people.

For those who flee persecution in their country, irrespective whether they are MUSLIMS or not, will apparently be 'pushed back to sea if they try to land'.

Thus, those who flee for their lives and liberty from oppressive regimes - will only be further subjected to harm by Malaysia, who is also calling on other ASEAN countries to do the same - '...to be pushed back if they attempt to land on any Southeast Asian shores in search of asylum...'

There was silence from the other Ministers in the UMNO-led BN government - and, as such, we can safely assume that they all agree that refugees or asylum seekers that come by sea will be pushed back - to face the dangers of the sea, starvation, thirst, poor health...and maybe even death. They just do not care for human life - irrespective also whether there are women and children above.

They maly not be voters, and people that matter to win elections (and by-elections) BUT they are human persons. The silence of our politicians and political parties when it comes to persons not-voters..not-citizens have been rather pathetic, and unfortunately th

This is so embarassing - and it certainly is not me. It is certainly not most Malaysians. We have always been a caring people, and we will certainly not treat other human persons in such a cruel, inhumane manner.

It is sad that the UMNO-led BN government is showing itself more and more to be 'EVIL' - more concerned for the well-being of companies and businesses rather than human persons and human life.

No religion, be it Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism would not consider this 'pushing back if they attempt to land' policy as a an evil..a Sin. We need to get new leaders, leaders that will better reflect the caring nature of the Malaysian people.

Malaysia's prime minister has called for Myanmar's Muslim boat people to be pushed back if they attempt to land on any Southeast Asian shores in search of asylum, according to newspaper reports Friday.

Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi also took swipes at Myanmar and Thailand on the Rohingya issue, which has escalated into a major problem for the region and one of concern internationally.

Thousands of the stateless Rohingya have fled Myanmar as well as refugee camps in Bangladesh in recent years, but their plight was only highlighted recently when hundreds were believed to have drowned after being pushed out to sea by the Thai military.

"But if we cannot be firm we cannot deal with this problem. We have to be firm at all borders. We have to turn them back," Abdullah said in an interview with the English-language Bangkok Post...

...But Abdullah expressed frustration in his interview with Myanmar's unwillingness to take the boat people back.

"Of course, we know they come from Myanmar (Burma). When we ask Myanmar, they ask: 'Are you sure they are our people? What evidence have you got?'" he said.- Washington Post, 27/2/2009, Malaysian PM: Send Muslim boat people back


Malaysia Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi told the Bangkok Post on Thursday that the government would turn back Rohingya boat people if they tried to come to Malaysia.

"We have to be firm at all borders. We have to turn them back," Abdullah said.

Malaysia has become the home of thousands of Rohingya in the past decades with the number being registered by the government reaching 14,300 - The Jakarta Post, 28/2/2009, Junta to take Rohingya back

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Maybe 100,000 foreign spouses - but only 8,600 given Entry Permits in last 7 years

It is shocking that in the past 7 years (2001 - 2008) ,Entry Permits have been only been issued to 8,600 foreign spouses (and their children) - when it is estimated that there may be at least 100,000 foreign spouses in Malaysia today. The Minister, in his reply to Parliament failed to give us the other important statistics - i.e. the number of foreign spouses in the country today...who have still not got their Entry Permit.

MORE than 8,600 foreigners, who are the spouses and children of Malaysians, have been given entry permits to stay in the country. Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar said 2,439 of them were Thais. The second largest group of 1,955 were Indonesians, followed by Indians, 1,785, Singaporeans, 846, Filipinos, 578 and other nationalities, 1,019. These permits were issued from 2001 to last year. Syed Hamid was replying to a question by Tan Ah Eng (BN-Gelang Patah). - New Straits Times, 12/3/2009, Entry permits for foreign spouses

As soon as the marriages are registered in Malaysia, foreign spouses of Malaysians should immediately be given Entry Permits, which would give them permanent residence status.

A marriage in our Asian context, is not just a bonding with 2 individuals, having responsibility only for each other and for children of their marriage. In our Asian context, marriage is also the 'marrying of 2 families' - and hence the responsibilities of a spouse also extends to the parents and family of the other spouse as well.

In the event, that there is an unexpected death of the Malaysian spouse (before the foreign spouse has been here more than 5 years and have had obtained her Entry Permit), the current situation in Malaysia will not allow the foreign spouse to continue to remain here in Malaysia and look after children of her marriage (who will be all Malaysians) and/or the parents/relatives/dependents of her now deceased Malaysian spouse. And this is definitely not right.

The foreign spouse then may have to uproot her Malaysian children - and go back to their country of origin. Is this right? But, the problem is that even if the foreign parent wishes to stay in Malaysia, with the children, it is generally not possible...considering her ability to remain in Malaysia depended on her Malaysian spouse being alive.

The foreign spouse then may have to leave the elderly parents/dependents of her now deceased Malaysian spouse and leave the country...

The foreign spouse may also have to leave the matrimonial home in Malaysia and go back...

And, that is why there must be a change in the law, and Entry Permits must be issued to the foreign spouse on the point of registration of a marriage. (Of course, Entry Permits could always be revoked later - if there is fraud, etc...)

Entry Permit (EP) is a permit issued to foreigners who are not citizen of Malaysia entering to reside in this country. Those who have been issued with EP are exempted from applying for any type of Pass either for employment or other purpose.
Conditions
Application
Notes
  • Wife of Malaysian Citizen residing in this country on long stay Social Visit Pass / Temporary Employment Pass / Employment Pass on a year-to-year renewable basis CONTINOUSLY for 5 years or more.

  • Application can be made using an IM.4 Pin 1/93 Form with a local sponsor by husband of applicant.

Enquiries can be forwarded to :-

Visa, Pass and Permit Division
Entry Permit Unit,
Department of Immigration, Malaysia
Level 3, Block 2G4 (PODIUM) Precint 2,
Federal Government Administration Centre,
62550 Putrajaya.


Tel No : 03-88801391, 03-88801373
Fax No : 03-88801374
or any department nearest to applicant.

Ministry of Human Resources.
Tel No : 03-8886500
Fax No : 03-8882378
E-mail:mhr@po.jaring.my
Website : www.jaring.my/ksm

The payment for issuance of Entry Permit is RM 120.00

  • Children of Malaysian Citizen below 6 years old.
  • Application can be made using an IM.4 Pin 1/93 Form sponsor by father / mother / close relative of applicant who is Malaysian Citizen / Permanent Resident of Malaysia.

  • Spouse and children of Malaysian Citizen who posess expertise / skills and overseas working experience, planning to return and work in Malaysia (under the programme to encourage Malaysian Citizens with expertise residing overseas to return to Malaysia).
  • Approval of this application will be given within 6 months from the date submition to the Immigration Department.
Source: Official Website of the Immigration Department of Malaysia

Discrimination also happens now - with this new policy to get Malaysians with skills/expertise now working overseas back to Malaysia.

As a lure, the government is giving their foreign spouses and children Entry Permits within 6 months from the date of application. Sometimes, these applications can also be made before the actual return.

For Malaysians who have been living(working, etc...) in this country all the while, their foreign spouses will only get their Entry Permits after more than 5 years have lapsed. No time is also specified as to when they will get the Entry Permit after submission of their applications.

This Discrimination must end...

This is an issue concerning children...and it must be a priority

This is an issue concerning the elderly...and it must be a priority

This is an issue concerning family ...and Asian values...and it must be a priority.

With regard to foreign spouses of Malaysians, there should also be no more requirement for Work Permits of any kind, upon the receipt of Entry Permits.

Read also my earlier posting/s on this matter:- Foreign spouses should get PR status on registration of marriage

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Levy on Foreign Workers Doubled - Make sure employer do NOT recover levy from workers

Many employers wrongly deduct the wages of their migrant workers to recover the 'levy' and other payments that they made to bring in the foreign worker to work for them. This is against the law - but alas there is really insufficient law enforcement by the Human Resource Ministry in this area.
He thanked the government for accepting the ministry's recommendation to double the levy on foreign workers, with the exception of the construction, plantation and domestic help sectors.

Subramaniam said the higher levy on foreign workers would make it more expensive for employers to hire them and make local workers more attractive. - New Straits Times, 11/3/2009,
Higher 'foreign' levy a boon
Now, the Malaysian government is doubling the 'levy on foreign workers' - but the hope is that employer do not just continue the practice of illegally deducting workers wages to recover what they paid.

The law on wages and deductions, in brief:-

1 - Workers should receive wages every month.

2. The total of any amounts deducted under this section from the wages of an employee in respect of any one month shall not exceed fifty per centum of the wages earned by that employee in that month. - Section 24, EMPLOYMENT ACT 1955

3. No deductions shall be made by an employer from the wages of an employee otherwise than in accordance with this Act. (section 24, Employment Act 1955)

4 - Permissible deductions, amongst other, are:-
a) deductions to the extent of any overpayment of wages made during the immediately preceding three months from the month in which deductions are to be made, by the employer to the employee by the employer's mistake

b) deductions for the recovery of advances of wages made under section 22 provided no interest is charged on the advances [section 22 limits the advances to not more than one(1) months wages -
'No employer shall during any one month make to an employee an advance or advances of wages not already earned by such employee which exceeds in the aggregate the amount of wages which the employee earned in the preceding month from his employment with such employer, or if he has not been so long in the employment of such employer, the amount which he is likely to earn in such employment during one month...'

c) deductions authorized by any other written law. (Examples of this is SOCSO and EPF, and in that law, there is clear provisions that allow for deduction from wages like ...'The amount of any contribution payable by the employer on behalf of the employee shall, notwithstanding the provisions of any written law or any contract to the contrary, be so recoverable by means of deductions from the wages of the employee due from the employer to the employee and not otherwise..."


See earlier posting - Levy, Air Fare,...cannot be deducted from Migrant Worker's wages..it is LAW.

I have perused the law, the Human Resource Ministry websites, the Immigration Department Website and the Home Ministry websites - and I have found no law, etc that permits employers to not pay foreign workers for months...or to deduct from workers wages levy, etc...

Where is the SIAP Bill (another "IPCMC" substitute)? Not there on the Parliament website

It is already bad enough the the government of the day 'secretly' and suddenly table Bills in Parliament to be passed, and become law.

The people really are never even consulted - or given any opportunity to be heard. (All the government need to do is to ensure that these Bills are, as soon as ready, immediately placed on the Parliamentary Website. (I found Bills tabled until 2008 - but alas nothing there about this SIAP Bill, tabled already in 2009.

Put the SIAP Bill up on the Parliment Website now...

The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Bill (or Siap by its Malay acronym), which covers 21 government agencies, was tabled for first reading in Parliament today.

MCPX

The body originated from a proposal for an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) which mutated to a weaker Special Complaints Commission (SCC) after the government back-pedalled on the concept.

bad police officersThe powerful IPCMC was recommended by a royal panel of inquiry on police operations to wipe out corruption and abuse of power in the police force.

The government, giving in to police objections, came up with the SCC Bill - one that has less power and which covers all other enforcement agencies as well.

However, the SCC Bill ran into a wall of criticism from human rights groups and opposition parties.

They argued that the proposed body was a "completely different animal" to the original IPCMC and that the SCC Bill was a watered-down version of the one envisioned by the royal panel.

Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who has vowed to push through a number of reforms before he retires later this month, is now making his final attempt with the Siap Bill. - Malaysiakini, 11/3/2009, Siap - the IPCMC 'replacement' bill


It is good that it will be covering all Enforcement Officers...including RELA, but all that really need to be done is to revert to the original IPCMC Bill as drafted by the 1st Royal Commission (and supported by the 2nd Royal Commission)

Besides the police and other enforcement agencies, Rela (People's Volunteer Corps) will also come under the purview of the Enforcement Agencies Integrity Commission, a bill on which will be tabled in Parliament soon. - Bernama, 4/3/2009, Rela To Be Monitored By Enforcement Agencies Integrity Commission

Do not disrespect the Yang Di Pertuan Agung's (King) by ignoring what the His Majesty's Royal Commissions proposed. Please table the originally proposed draft.

Permissible maybe to extend its coverage to other Enforcement officers, or maybe just keep it for the police. Table a similar Bill for other enforcement bodies later on.

Before that the government tabled another alternative Bill, called the SCC Bill, and it is best to remember the differences it had with the original Bill. Malaysiakini analysed this differences for us...Source: Malaysiakini, 27/12/2007, SCC vs IPCMC: Check out the difference

The controversial Special Complaints Commission - a much watered-down version of the independent body mooted by the Royal Police Commission -

has come under intense fire for its lack of power and independence.

Given the widespread opposition to this new proposal - which some ex-commissioners and opposition politicians described as a completely ‘different animal’ - the bill has been postponed to the next parliamentary sitting in March 2008.

The SCC bill is the government's answer to the proposed Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission bill drafted by the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police two years ago.

In its report, the Royal Police Commission recommended the formation of an independent agency to oversee public complaints against the police, arguably the most powerful watchdog ever proposed in Malaysia.

Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang will be calling for a parliamentary roundtable
tomorrow to discuss how to salvage the original proposal made by the Royal Police Commission.

The roundtable, which was originally scheduled for today, will be attended by a number of human rights organsations and some of the royal commission members.

But what exactly are the differences between the SCC and IPCMC? Malaysiakini

compares the key features of the two bodies. Members

The SCC chairperson and three other commissioners are appointed by the prime minister and may be revoked at any time without explanation. Commissioners will hold office for two years, not more than two consecutive terms.

The inspector-general of police, director-general of Public Complaints Bureau and director-general of the Anti-Corruption Agency will automatically be members of the SCC.

Whereas IPCMC commissioners are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. The king is to choose no more than seven commissioners, including a chairperson and two deputies who will hold full time posts. The chairperson and deputies are required to have at least 10 years legal experience.

Parliamentarians, state legislators, former or current members of the police force are not eligible as commissioners. Commissioners may hold office for a period not exceeding two consecutive three-year terms.

Powers

The IPCMC has the power to launch its own investigations whereas the SCC would channel it to a special task force.

The SCC task force is to be headed by a chief executive officer and the commission is to engage task force officers from the public services, police force, legal officers or its own commissioners.

On the other hand, the IPCMC has the freedom to establish a task force or joint task forces or cooperate with other such groups. It may also engage consultants or officers to perform services for it and these may include retired or former police officers.

The commission will work with relevant bodies in its investigation including the Anti-Corruption Agency, the auditor-general, the Securities Commission, Bank Negara and overseas police forces.

Functions

The IPCMC's main function is to receive and inquire into complaints, particularly "to detect, investigate and prevent police corruption and other serious misconduct."

On the other hand, the SCC merely receives complaints related to an enforcement officer's misconduct and will direct its task force to investigate. The investigation will then be forwarded to the appropriate disciplinary authorities or public prosecutor if legal action is required.

In contrast, the IPCMC has the power to discipline and can, via its chief legal counsel, initiate legal action against police officers found guilty of misconduct.

It is interesting to note that the SCC bill has dropped corruption from its functions and focus.

The IPCMC has a broader scope of function that goes beyond investigating complaints. It is tasked to develop and implement mechanisms to detect, investigate and prevent misconduct. It may also examine and verify any procedural infringement, corruption and misconduct.

Further, the IPCMC will make provisions to audit and monitor particular aspects of the police force's procedure and operations. It may also play a role in promoting awareness of police ethics and integrity or recommending appropriate methods to the government for that purpose.

The IPCMC also has the right to visit police stations and other places of detention.

Investigative powers


The SCC may conduct preliminary investigations "to determine the merit of a complaint" after which it will refer its early findings to relevant bodies for further investigation or action.

On the other hand, the IPCMC may investigate on its own initiative any reports received, referred to it or complaints it has become aware of.

The IPCMC also has the power to direct the IGP to investigate or stop the investigation of any complaints. It may also take over investigation from the IGP without being required to disclose anything to the IGP.

Who can it investigate?

The SCC can investigate all enforcement officers at the federal level while the IPCMC can only probe police personnel.

The IPCMC will investigate any misconduct "by way of action or inaction or alleged" that includes corruption or any corrupt conduct as specified by the Anti-Corruption Act, the commissioning of criminal offences, failure to follow laws or the IGP's rules and any matters which a complaint can be made under the Police Act.

The IPCMC cannot investigate a case involving the employee of a public body or statutory authority if the complaint does not also involve a police officer.

However, it may investigate others cases involving police officers, regardless of whether a police officer was on duty or not, regardless of whether the alleged misconduct occurred within or outside Malaysia and if the misconduct occurred prior to the existence of this Act.

The IPCMC may even investigate cases where no police misconduct is suspected or cases where no particular police officer or other person is implicated.

The SCC will not examine any complaints that are deliberated by other disciplinary authorities, courts and enforcement agencies. Neither will it consider cases that have already been determined by those authorities.

Disciplinary powers

The SCC can only refer investigation papers and documents to the disciplinary authorities if the established misconduct is disciplinary or the public prosecutor if the misconduct is criminal.

The IPCMC may refer a matter to relevant authorities for investigation or action but it can also act on its own prerogative.

The IPCMC can caution and discharge, remove badges and allowances, stop salary increments or impose a fine upon establishing guilt and considering the severity of an officer's misconduct.

It also has the power to demote, transfer duties or dismiss the officer concerned. These disciplinary powers are final and cannot be "challenged, appealed or overturned in any court."

While the IPCMC can initiate its own legal action via its chief legal counsel, it may also refer to the public prosecutor matters involving money laundering, confiscation or recovery of crime proceeds.

The IPCMC may enter into arrangements with the public prosecutor and may recommend that legal immunity be granted to certain persons.

If a corporation is found guilty by the IPCMC, the maximum penalty is double of the monetary penalty stipulated for that offence.

Further action

If the IPCMC is unsatisfied with the disciplinary action taken by the appropriate authorities or public prosecutor, it may submit a report and recommendations to the prime minister after giving the relevant bodies a chance to comment. If it is still unsatisfied, the IPCMC may also submit a report to parliament.

There is no such provisions in the SCC bill.

Power to amend Act

Under the Special Complaints Commissions Act, the prime minister has the power to amend any provisions of the act to "remove difficulties and prevent anomalies" within two years of its enactment.

The IPCMC bill has no provisions for amendments.

Secrecy laws

The SCC's investigations are curtailed by the Official Secret Act 1972 [Act88] or any laws regarding confidentiality of documents or information while these do not apply to the IPCMC.

The IPCMC can intercept any method or form of communications for its investigations.

Commission reports

The IPCMC reports directly to parliament on any investigations or public hearings it has conducted.

It may also recommend that a report be made public, irrespective of whether it has been laid before parliament or not.

The IPCMC may submit special reports to parliament at any time on matters of administration and general policies that relate to its function. It may also submit reports to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong at any time, with a copy made available to the prime minister.

The SCC submits its annual report to parliament while the IPCMC annual reports must be submitted to the prime minister and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, who will then make it available in parliament.

Arrest and search warrants

The IPCMC has the power to issue arrest warrants for persons who have failed to appear at its hearings while the SCC can apply to a magistrate for a summons to secure a person's attendance.

IPCMC commissioners or any officer authorised in writing may enter premises, inspect documents at the premise and take copies. The IPCMC is also empowered to issue a search warrant if necessary and if there are reasonable grounds to do so.

IN BRIEF: SCC vs IPCMC

Appointments

SCC - Prime minister to appoint commissioners

IPCMC - Agong to appoint commissioners

Members

SCC - Inspector-general of police, Public Complaints Bureau director-general and Anti-Corruption Agency director-general are automatic members.

IPCMC - Unlike SCC, parliamentarians, state legislators, former or current police officers not eligible as commissioners.

Investigative powers

SCC- Task force to investigate complaints.

IPCMC - Power to initiate own investigation and to direct IGP on investigations.

Secrecy laws

SCC - Bound by Official Secrets Act and secrecy laws.

IPCMC - Not subjected to secrecy laws and can intercept any form of communication.

Investigative powers

SCC - Power to probe all enforcement officers at the federal level.

IPCMC - Can only investigate current and former police officers whether alleged misconduct was committed on or off duty.

Disciplinary powers


SCC - Refer investigation to disciplinary authorities or public prosecutor for legal action.

IPCMC - Has disciplinary powers and can initiate legal action via its chief legal counsel.

Amendments


SCC - PM empowered to amend the Act in the first two years.

IPCMC - No provisions for amendments.

Annual reports

SCC - Annual reports submitted to parliament.

IPCMC - Annual reports submitted to parliament through PM and Agong. Case and special reports can be made direct to parliament.




Which Minister is telling the truth? HR or Home Minister?

Who is the Minister in charge of manpower needs - the Human Resource Minister...or the Home Minister (in charge of Immigration).

Today(10/3/2009), there were 2 reports in the Star newspaper...

- the Human Resource Minister says estimated 70,000 - but good old Home Minister embarrasses the HR Minister, who is supposed to be the Minister who should be best informed on matters concerning manpower matters, etc..

Home Minister says that there is no such thing. In fact, he says all 55,147 visas had already been canceled, and no new visas have been issued.

- Maybe the Human Resource Minister should resign...He should have just come out and stated that the earlier report was wrong. (But was the HR Minister wrong? Maybe, it was good old Home Minister who made the mistake...). That's it - there is confusion. Are there 70,000 new workers from Bangladesh coming in or not...

- The Human Resource Ministry should really be the Ministry responsible for foreign workers, and not the Home Ministry.

The HR Minister's statements reported:-
The Human Resources Ministry will work closely with the Home Ministry to ensure that the estimated 70,000 Bangladeshi workers expected to enter the country are only employed in sectors they are allowed to work in.

Human Resources Minister Datuk Dr S. Subramaniam said the authorities would ensure that the foreigners do not work in sectors where a freeze has been imposed by the Government.

“There are two sectors in which we have not frozen (the intake of migrant labour), namely the plantation and construction sectors.

“This is because there is still a great demand for foreign workers in these sectors as we are unable to find locals to fill them,” Subramaniam told reporters at the Marsimaham Hindu festival in Krubong yesterday after fulfilling a vow he had made.

He was commenting on the recent statement by the Bangladesh High Commission labour counsellor Talat Mahmud Khan that some 70,000 workers were expected here soon to work in the plantation, construction and service sectors.

Subramaniam said his ministry would liaise with the Home Ministry and the high commission to ensure that the workers only came in for sectors where there was no freeze.

He added that Bangladeshis were permitted to work as cleaners as the employment of foreigners in the service sector had yet to be frozen. - Star, 10/3/2009, Bangladeshis only for allowed sectors, says minister

And the report about what the Home Minister said -

PUTRAJAYA: All entry visas for Bangladeshi workers, approved in 2007 and who had not entered the country, have been cancelled immediately, said Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar Tuesday.

Speaking to reporters after his ministry’s monthly assembly here, he said the move was in line with the government’s decision to not accept any new applications unless they were for critical sectors.

”The government has decided to cancel all entry visas for Bangladeshi workers wanting to enter the country.

”This is due to the current scenario in the country, in that there is no need for foreign labour, except for certain sectors identified by the government,” he said.

With the move, Syed Hamid said the government will refund workers’ levies paid by employers.

“The government gives assurance that the levy would be refunded in the near future and hopes the issue would not be politicised by certain quarters,” he said.

Syed Hamid said this in response to a statement by the Labour Counsellor at the Bangladeshi High Commission here, Talat Mahmud Khan, on Sunday that more than 70,000 Bangladeshi workers would enter Malaysia soon to work in various sectors.

Correcting the figure, Syed Hamid said government entry-approval for the workers who had yet to enter the country but had not done so was for only 55,147 persons.

”No new approval was made after that year and I do not know how the figure was arrived yet. I will ask the Bangladesh counsellor to meet the Immigration Department to clarify the matter.

”Decision to take in foreign workers after that period would be made carefully for sectors classified as 3D or dirty, dangerous and difficult. That too if really necessary,” he said. - Bernama- Star, 10/3/2009, Visas for 55,000 Bangladeshi workers cancelled

Pay cut for CEO, Management,Directors..of companies taking 'rakyat's RM60 billion'

RM60 Billion - a lot of money, but sadly a lot of it going to companies and businesses, and very little going to the rakyat directly.

Wonder whether conditions will be placed on these companies who receive these monies, like what Obama did in US?

Maybe, the government should fix the maximum Director allowance payable, and also the salary/allowance limits for the CEO and management staff.

It is absurd that these companies take the money of the people (duit rakyat) but still still continue getting exhorbitant salaries and large allowances, and other benefits. Pay rises of CEO and upper management should also be frozen, and not essential benefits and allowances should be done away with?

After all financial crisis is not a new thing - and it comes around every 10 years or so. Thus, if some companies have not put in place the required 'protection' for a rainy day, and now requires to take government money by reason of their lack of preparedness - then the people responsible being the Directors, CEO and Upper Management must also pay for their failings.

The government unveiled a RM60 billion stimulus package today as it attempts to arrest the export-driven economy's slide into recession.

MCPX

The RM60 billion package will be implemented over two years up to 2010.- Malaysiakini, 10/3/2009, Najib unveils RM60bil stimulus package


Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Malaysia: Ok to terminate worker's contracts but not OK to terminate contract with toll operators, etc...

What about the contractual obligation of employers to their workers - their foreign workers. Normally, the obligation by contact is to provide employment for 3 years (or 5 years)?

Apparently, the Malaysian government says that these contracts can be broken - and to help employers break contracts with migrant workers, the government in fact enacted also a provision in the Employment Act, i.e. section 60N (which I believe, is definitely discriminatory and unconstitutional - it goes against the guarantees of equality provided by Article 8 of the Federal Constitution..see my earlier post - Malaysia's 'Foreign Workers First Out'(FWFO) principle is unconstitutional and discriminatory)

So, today during the financial crisis that we are going through, which is expected to see a lot of retrenchment, employers are using that unconstitutional section 60N - and terminating foreign workers, and breaching the contractual obligations to these workers.

Remember also the importance and the 'un-breakability' of all the other kinds of contracts, with them toll operators, water companies. Remember how the government is now taking millions of ringgit of our money and paying the toll operators as compensation for not yet increasing certain toll rates. {Also our money is being used for worker re-training programs in companies - WHY? Wonder whether like US, the government has conditions about maximum salary/allowance that the CEO, Management and Directors be getting when they receive government aid?}

But, when it comes to workers - the migrant workers, the government is encouraging employers to break these contracts. In fact as incentive, the government is also saying that they will give back employers speedily the levies that they paid for their foreign workers. Is the government paying these workers any compensation?

Malaysia's employers can apply to fire foreign workers early
Last Updated(Beijing Time):2009-02-04 09:03

Companies with foreign workers and are facing the economic crunch can now apply to let go these workers even if their service contracts have yet to expire, Malaysian Human Resource Minister Subramaniam said in Langkawi, northern Kedah state on Tuesday.

"I have discussed this with Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and it is to help companies that are affected by the economic downturn," he told reporters after opening a hospitality course organized by the Manpower Department.

Besides this, companies that retrenched foreign workers could also reclaim any balance on levies already paid to the government, he said.

Prior to this, companies were having difficulty retrenching foreign workers because they had to honor the contracts with their foreign workers while the foreign worker levy had to be paid on an annual basis.

So far this year, the ministry had received applications from companies to retrench 9,000 workers of whom 6,000 were foreign workers, Subramaniam said.

Till Jan 31, a total of 15,000 workers were retrenched nationwide with most of them in the manufacturing sector, he said.

To address the problem of lay offs, his ministry had introduced re-training programs for workers with the government absorbing the costs, he added.

This was better than having employees asked to go on extended leave because of the slowdown, he said. Source:- China Economic Net Website


Is the government doing anything to find these retrenched foreign workers new jobs? NO - but they are bringing in more new migrant workers - about 70,000 from Bangladesh. Should Malaysia not be giving jobs to retrenched migrant workers? [See earlier post - Absurd that Malaysia bringing in 70,000 more Migrant Workers now]

Monday, March 09, 2009

Malaysia's 'Foreign Workers First Out'(FWFO) principle is unconstitutional and discriminatory

When it comes to retrenchment, the general principle followed was 'Last In First Out' (LIFO) but today in Malaysia a new principle is emerging 'Foreign Workers First Out'(FWFO) - and the question is whether this is right.

Remember the highest law of the land is the Federal Constitution - and Article 8 (1) provides that 'All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law...'. The word used is 'person' - and that clearly means it applies to both citizen and non-citizen.

Again Article 8(3), which uses the term 'person' states as follows: 'There shall be no discrimination in favour of any person on the ground that he is a subject of the Ruler of any State.' Does this refer to only the States in Malaysia - or does it refer to 'any State' as in any nation...any country? The word used is 'person', and not 'citizen' and as such it leans towards the interpretation that this applies also to foreigners.

There are stated exceptions in Article 8, where discrimination is permissible - but alas there is nothing that allows discrimination based on the fact that a worker is not a Malaysian national.

In the Employment Act 1955, Section 60N, it states:-

60N. Termination of employment by reason of redundancy.

Where an employer is required to reduce his workforce by reason of redundancy necessitating the retrenchment of any number of employees, the employer shall not terminate the services of a local employee unless he has first terminated the services of all foreign employees employed by him in a capacity similar to that of the local employee.

[Ins. Act A1026]

Thus, it seems that the FWFO principle seems to be coming from the Employment Act - but is not section 60N going against the Federal Constitution?

Section 60N is ultravires the Federal Constitution - and that FWFO principle is unconstitutional, and must be stopped.

Foreign workers who have been retrenched using this FWFO principle can possibly commence legal action against their employers - and be awarded damages.
Employers must retrench their foreign workers ahead of their Malaysian staff as they seek to weather the current economic slowdown, said Deputy Human Resource Minister Datuk Noraini Ahmad.

She reiterated that employers should adopt the Government’s foreign worker first out (FWFO) principle. - Star, 28/2/2009 - Retrench foreign workers first, employers told

Article 8 of the Federal Constitution is laid out in full belowto convince you that there is no provision there that justifies discrimination of workers based on their not being citizens:-

FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTIES

8. Equality.

(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.

(2) Except as expressly authorised by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent, place of birth or gender in any law or in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment.

[Am. Act A1130]

(3) There shall be no discrimination in favour of any person on the ground that he is a subject of the Ruler of any State.

(4) No public authority shall discriminate against any person on the ground that he is resident or carrying on business in any part of the Federation outside the jurisdiction of the authority.

(5) This Article does not invalidate or prohibit -

(a) any provision regulating personal law;

(b) any provision or practice restricting office or employment connected with the affairs of any religion, or of an institution managed by a group professing any religion, to persons professing that religion;

(c) any provision for the protection, well-being or advancement of the aboriginal peoples of the Malay Peninsula (including the reservation of land) or the reservation to aborigines of a reasonable proportion of suitable positions in the public service;

(d) any provision prescribing residence in a State or part of a State as a qualification for election or appointment to any authority having jurisdiction only in that State or part, or for voting in such an election;

(e) any provision of a Constitution of a State, being or corresponding to a provision in force immediately before Merdeka Day;

(f) any provision restricting enlistment in the Malay Regiment to Malays.


Sunday, March 08, 2009

Absurd that Malaysia bringing in 70,000 more Migrant Workers now

Absurd and very wrong - 'a great injustice'.

It is better to retain the existing Migrant Workers for their promised term of employment of 3 years or more is completed rather than bringing in fresh new migrants...

Migrant Workers are being retrenched - sent back. Many will not even have made enough to settle their debts back home - i.e. the monies they had borrowed to pay agents/etc to come over here to Malaysia to work.

It is shocking to read that Malaysia is now still bringing in another 70,000 Bangladeshis...
More than 70,000 Bangladeshi workers are expected to arrive in Malaysia soon to take up employment in the plantation, construction and services sectors, the Labour Counsellor at the Bangladesh High Commission here, Talat Mahmud Khan, disclosed Sunday.

Talat said that despite the economic downturn and rising retrenchment in Malaysia, Bangladeshi workers were still in demand as they were considered to be hardworking, efficient, obedient and trainable and did not demand a high salary.

Bangladeshi workers were known to be able to handle multiple tasks, he added.

He explained that though there was a temporary freeze on the intake of foreign workers in the services sector, the visas for these Bangladeshi workers were approved before the imposition of the restriction.

With the upcoming arrival of more Bangladeshi workers, their number in the country would swell to almost 500,000, including 2,000 women, he told Bernama.

Talat said that at present Bangladeshi women workers were confined to the manufacturing sector, mainly in the garment and glove-making factories. They were not allowed to work as domestic maids.

He said the main grouse of the Bangladeshi workers here was that many of them were not given the promised proper living quarters and medical benefits by their management.

They were also unhappy with the delay in the renewal of their visas, which sometimes took up to three months. In the interim period, they were considered illegal immigrants, he added.

"This is why many of the Bangladeshi workers get caught by the Malaysian immigration (authorities)," he explained.

The Bangladesh High Commission has set up a halfway centre in Semenyih to house such workers. The centre, which can accommodate about 1,000 workers at any one time, has modern facilities from kitchen to television and also computers.

Talat said he hoped that the Malaysian government would reduce the transfer fee for workers wanting to change their sector of work. The fee now is RM350.

He said the compound fee for expired visa was also high, at RM30 per day, and suggested that this fee be reduced to about RM100 for the first three months.

Talat said he was happy with the cooperation extended by the Immigration Department as it had helped the High Commission to resolve many issues pertaining to the workers.

On the social impact of the Bangladeshi workers on Malaysian society, he said the impact was low as the workers were confined mostly to their workplaces and seldom ventured outside.

"However, considering the huge Bangladeshi population in Malaysia, I do not discount the possibility of a few Bangladeshi youths getting involved with local girls, but this is very rare," he stressed.

By and large, Bangladeshi workers were here to earn a honest living and return to their homeland after finishing their contract, he said - Bernama - The Star, 8/3/2009, 70,000 more Bangladeshi workers coming to M’sia

If migrant workers are needed for the Plantations - then use the 'retrenched' or 'soon-to-be retrenched' Migrant Workers from the other sectors.

Do not bring in new migrant workers now..at this time of financial crisis - when jobs are being lost daily.

Bahasa Melayu versus English? Political Games or real issues?

English or Bahasa Melayu? Which language should Science and Maths be taught in?

About 6 years ago, the government suddenly changed its policy and started teaching Science and Maths in English....and now, 6 years later, people are protesting this and asking that we go back to using Bahasa Melayu..

Interestingly, amongst the groups protesting are the the PKR, PAS...and also aparently the Dong Zong, the Tamil Foundation, SUARAM and civil society groups.

Faisal stressed that the movement was multiracial, saying that the United Chinese School Committees Association of Malaysia (Dong Zong) had been formally invited into the coalition. Representatives of the Tamil Foundation Malaysia were present at the launch.

The problems of PPSMI

PKR Youth exco Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad said that PPSMI compromised constitutional sovereignty.

"This is treachery to the spirit of the Constitution, which affords special status to Malay as the national language," he said.

Nik Nazmi added that the current policy prejudiced students from poorer backgrounds and widened the gap between the middle and lower classes, as those proficient in English tend to live urban areas and are more likely to come from higher-income families. - The Nut Graph, 1/2/2009, Parties join forces to fight PPSMI

GMP telah mendapat sokongan terbaharu daripada Majlis Permuafakatan Persatuan Ibubapa & Guru Nasional (PIBGN) yang mempunyai 8000 persatuan PIBG di seluruh negara. Pihak Suara Rakyat Malaysia(SUARAM) bersama 53 persatuan lain telah turut sama menyokong GMP. Gerakan Mansuhkan PPSMI (GMP) Website, Bersama Menjayakan Himpunan Aman 100 Ribu Mansuhkan PPSMI - 27/2/2009

What is the history?

It seems that '...The change to medium of instruction in Bahasa Melayu began in 1970 for Standard 1 and by 1983 the whole exercise was completed in tertiary education .Which means we’ve used Bahasa Melayu as medium of instruction for Maths and Science for 32 years..." and the shift in policy, i.e. the teaching of Science and Maths in English started in 2003.

From the Education Ministry website (which as usual has not been updated for some time with regard to this page..), a brief history of the usage of Bahasa Melayu in the Malaysian system of education..
Bahasa Melayu in the System of Education
1957 . Compulsory subject in primary and secondary schools
1970 . Medium of instruction in Standard 1
1975 . All English Primary Schools were converted into National Primary Schools
1976 . Medium of instruction in Form 1
1979 . Medium of instruction in Form VI, arts stream
1980 . Medium of instruction in Year 1 of arts faculty in universities
1981 . Medium of instruction in Form VI, science stream
1982 . Medium of instruction at all levels in schools
1983 . Medium of instruction for all courses in universities
Source: Ministry of Education Website

There must be choices - and maybe compulsory education of subjects in one language may need to be abolished.

Maybe, there must be options available to studying Maths and Science (and other subjects), in Bahasa Melayu or English or Mandarin.

When we slowly stopped the usage of English for teaching of all subjects, save English, from our schools, there was definitely a deterioration in the grasp of that language - and that becomes an impediment, if and when our students wants to further their studies overseas, where English is the medium of instruction.

We must note that Malaysia has also, at the same time, not been very serious in the promotion and usage of Bahasa Melayu at the higher levels. We cannot really find many reference books in Bahasa Melayu in our bookshops and libraries. Look at Thailand - where all kinds of books and magazines are also translated into Thai.

Bahasa Melayu is used by persons in Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Southern Thailand, ....
...today Malay-Indonesian ranks around sixth or seventh in size among the world's languages. With dialect variations it is spoken by more than 200 million people in the modern states of Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei. It is also an important vernacular in the southern provinces of Thailand, in East Timor and among the Malay people of Australia's Cocos Keeling Islands in the Indian Ocean. It is understood in parts of the Sulu area of the southern Philippines and traces of it are to be found among people of Malay descent in Sri Lanka, South Africa and other places. Source: Bahasa Indonesia: The Indonesian Language

And another source reveals:

Language list by number of speakers

(Number of speakers in millions, as of midyear 1991; includes native and non-native speakers)
 1. Mandarin (China)  885
2. English 450
3. Hindi 367
4. Spanish 352
5. Russian 294
6. Arabic 202
7. Bengali 187
8. Portuguese 175
9. Malay-Indonesian 145
10. Japanese 126
11. French 122
12. German 118
13. Urdu (India, Pakistan) 94
14. Punjabi (India, Pakistan) 87
15. Korean (Koreas, China) 72
16. Telugu (India) 69
17. Tamil (India, Sri Lanka) 66
18. Marathi (India) 65
19. Cantonese (China,
Hong-Kong) 64
20. Italian 63
21. Wu (China) 63
22. Javanese (Java, Indonesia) 60
23. Vietnamese 59
24. Turkish 56
25. Min (China, Taiwan,
Malaysia) 49
26. Thai 48
Source:- Major Languages of the World
Looking at the facts, it makes sense having a good grasp of Bahasa Melayu

Of course, if we also have a good grasp of English - then it is better still

And, if we have a good grasp of Mandarin, it is even better still...

Good grasp of languages is important when it comes to furthering studies overseas..and for relating/communicating when it comes to business,etc.

Still strong in his convictions that the move to start using English for the teaching of Science and Maths is our former PM - Mahathir Mohammad

The former premier explained that Malaysia cannot any longer offer itself as a cheap labour country.

He explained that with Malaysia's population expected to hit 35 million by 2020, a mass consumer market would make local manufacturing more viable.

"Against this, expect increased and less restricted imports. We must be more competitive and develop skills in hi-tech products and we must pay higher wages.

"The days of low labour costs would have been over before 2020," he said.

He noted that local workers must then be highly qualified and be trained in higher skills. Training of workers must be done at specialised training centres with computer programmes needed to carry it out.

"What all these means is that specialised education and training would become big business. The training centres would also cater for foreign students if we use English as a teaching medium," he said.

But chances are, the local highly trained workers would still cost less than similarly trained workers in the developed countries, which could mean a shift of some middle range hi-tech industries into Malaysia.

He added that although the country's present advantage was still the ability to take instructions in English, there would be a spread of the English language capabilities in China, Vietnam and other competitors.

"I hope the teaching of science and mathematics in English would continue.

"But I am not sure. If the decision is made not to, then the hi-tech industries are going to bypass us," he said. - Bernama, 8/8/2008, Malaysia Needs To Manage And Adjust To Higher Cost Economy, Says Mahathir
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi seems to be non-commital - apparently waiting for the Education Ministry's report...

The issue in these protest is not so much for a decreasing on the emphasis of English mastery - but more the manner in which the promotion of the usage of English is currently done. They seem to be saying teaching the subject of Science and Maths in English is not the way...

On the ground, the problem seems that it is the teachers that are having difficulty teaching in English now. Students seem to be able to cope. Remember, only teachers above 47 years studied Science and Maths in English - the others studied it in Bahasa Melayu - in fact they studied all subjects in Bahasa Melayu, except for English language.

Of course, this 'teething problem' is expected - and it also did happen when suddenly teachers had to teach in Bahasa Melayu.

It takes time...at least 15 years before we will see the emergence of the 1st batch of teachers that also studied Maths and Science in English.

The poor grasp of English by teachers today will also impact the teaching and hence the achievements of students - there will be a drop in performance.

The shifting back to Bahasa Melayu after 6 years will also bring about an adverse effect to students who have been studying Science and Maths in English for the past 6 years.

We need to study this matter - maybe even have a referendum, after providing Malaysians the pros and cons...Let the people decide.

Some of these who are now promoting the reversion back to using Bahasa Melayu in Maths and Science may be doing it just to fulfil some political agenda.

After all, the struggle seem to be a unifying struggle having the capacity of bringing Malaysians from different ethnicities and religious beliefs together.

It is also a good issue that puts UMNO and the BN against the wall, does it not?

But politiscs and political games aside, this is a serious issue and decisions should not be made speedily as it will affect our children and their future.

The biggest victims will be the poor and those from the rural areas - for the rich and the middle class are already resorting to private education institute and extra classes to increase the English language grasp of their children.

It also irks me that many of the proponents of language rights are sometimes hypocrites themselves.

When it comes to their own children, they really do not sent them to the Tamil schools (for the advocates of Tamil education) or Bahasa Melayu schools ... It is all 'politics'...

Even our past Prime Minister Tun Razak - did not want to send his kid to the schools in Pahang, he sent Najib to St Johns - and when it came to secondary education, off went Najib to England...
Najib is the eldest son of Malaysia’s second Prime Minister, Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, and was born in the district of Kuala Lipis in the state of Pahang on 23 July 1953. He received his primary and lower secondary education at one of the leading schools in the country, the St John Institution. He then continued his secondary education at the Malvern Boy’s College, Worcestershire, England. Upon completion of his secondary education, Najib enrolled at the University of Nottingham graduating in 1974 in industrial economics. - Who is Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak?
In fact, I believe that many of our 'leaders' children never get their education fully (from Std 1 to Form 6) in the Malaysian government schools.

They shout about the 'goodness' of the education system in Malaysia - but alas, when it comes to their very own children, what they say is good for all Malaysians certainly seems not good enough for the kids of these political/economic elites of our society.

I am also concerned about the reason why this teaching of Science and Maths in English have today become an issue, after 6 years...

The Education Minister is also wondering...
Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein is puzzled why only now, after six years, is the policy of teaching of Science and Mathematics in English being demonised.
"Why is there a police report six years later... only after six years it (the policy) is being questioned on a constitutional basis, only after six years they have a gathering?" he asked.

Hishammuddin was commenting on the demonstration and handing over of a memorandum protesting against the use of English in the teaching of Science and Mathematics in schools at Istana Negara yesterday.

"This is more so when whatever decisions to be adopted can only be implemented next year with Year One students." - New Straits Times, 8/3/2009,
Why bring up issue 6 years later?
Is it all just politics...and political games...to be 'more Melayu' in wooing the support of Malays?

What is the percentage of Bahasa Melayu usage in our education system - I believe that it is used for all subjects save English, Maths and Science - so, talking about it being a violation of Article 152 of the Federal Constitution is rather lame..

Persons have the right to prootest ...to peaceful assembly- and definitely the actions of the police again have to be strongly condemned...

Police came down hard on some 8,000 people taking part in a protest march from Masjid Negara to Istana Negara in Kuala Lumpur this afternoon.

MCPX

ppsmi march 070309 crowd.jpgThey cordoned off the road leading to the palace, firing rounds of tear gas at the crowd as they approached the palace.

The march was organised by the coalition against the teaching of science and maths in English (GMP).

GMP, known in its Malay name as Gerakan Mansuhkan PPSMI, is a coalition of 14 NGOs. Some of its pro-tem committee members include opposition politicians. - Malaysiakini, 8/3/2009, Language march: Tear gas fired

Saturday, March 07, 2009

SUHAKAM: "...denial of medical attention.. a serious violation of that person’s right to life..."

In the case of Lourdes Mary, SUHAKAM views the denial of medical attention to the point of endangering one’s life as a serious violation of that person’s right to life. If there was such negligence on the part of the police, we agree that the matter should be investigated into and proper steps should be talcen to ensure that such disregard for life does not happen again, As such, SUHAKAM will highlight the matter to the police and recommend for a thorough investigation to be conducted into the matter. - letter of SUHAKAM to AHRC dated 13/1/2009

Health-care in detention in Malaysia is a very serious concern today...

People are dying in custody by reason of the government failing to provide the necessary health-care.

Persons under detention, who in normal circumstances would have been admitted in hospitals, and just taken back to their lock-ups and places of detention - and some die.

Persons who need to be sent to the hospital must be sent there immediately...

Persons who need to be hospitalized must be hospitalized.

Generally, the place of detention that is worst off in terms of conditions and hygine is the Malaysian police lock-ups. The men's lock-ups are worst off compared with those for women. Remand prisons and prison lock-ups are so much better compared to police lock-ups.

The Detention Centres for undocumented migrants is also very bad.

Recalling some of the cases highlighted in the media...

LOURDES MARY ...

hindraf kajang magistrate 241008 lourdes mary faintedDuring the remand hearing, one of the female detainee, Lourdes Mary, fainted in court while explaining the lock-up condition to the magistrate.

According to Surendran, the detainee is a diabetic and her legs have swollen twice the size as she was unable to obtain insulin since her detention yesterday.

“I have never seen this kind of neglect in court before,” lamented the lawyer.

Meanwhile, another legal team member M Manogaran criticised the police for demanding lawyers to register themselves before entering the court building and for barring journalists from entering the complex. - Malaysiakini, 24/10/2008 Child, mother freed, 10 remanded
That incident was also reported in the Star,

At around noon, there was a minor commotion when Lourdes Mary, who is believed to be suffering from diabetes, fainted in the midst of remand proceedings and had to be carried out of the courtroom into a nearby car to be taken to the Putrajaya Hospital. - Star, 24/10/2008 -Ten Hindraf supporters remanded for three days (updated) Source: Earlier Posting

1,300 died because of lack of healthcare and access to healthcare..

ABOUT 1,300 illegal foreigners have died during detention in the past six years, Malaysia Nanban quoted Malaysian Human Rights (Suhakam) commissioner Datuk N. Siva Subramaniam as saying.

He said many of them died in immigration detention centres, prisons and police lockups because they were denied medical treatment at the right time.

He proposed that a doctor and a medical assistant be appointed in each detention camp and prison which should have the necessary facilities to transfer sick prisoners to hospitals during an emergency.

He said detention camps now have appointed doctors who make regular visits.

He also said that Suhakam had submitted a memorandum to the Government proposing the appointment of a doctor to visit police stations to monitor the health of suspects held in lockups. - Star, 18/12/2008 - 1,300 foreign detainees died due to neglect

Uthayakumar, Anwar Ibrahim are examples of persons that have raised the issue of healthcare whilst in detention.

However, after his realese there seems to be little or no talk about healthcare and detentioon places from Anwar Ibrahim...or has he spoke of it, and I missed it.

But alas, most of those who have detained and released just do not want to highlight the injustices that they did suffer whilst in detention, be it on the question of torture...or on the question of healthcare access. Their silence have help maintain 'torture'...in Malaysia today. At last, it is good that there are some who have the courage to raise the issue...and today, the issue of torture and death in custody are important concerns for Malaysians.

I hope that Detention Conditions - including quality of health care and access to healthcare also becomes an issue of concern. Many died because the failings of detaining authorities in the area of healthcare - and these persons who died in custody are just recorded as dying by reason of illness, etc...(and blame is not placed on the detaining authority at all...and as such there is no question of reforms or improvements)

Pakatan Rakyat can initiate reforms - both in the States they control, and also in Parliament - but have they?

There are UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which we should look at...

It may not be practical to have doctors at each and every police lock-up - but maybe, it is possible to have a policy that all sick prisoners (and those that require to be admitted) be admitted in the nearest hospital. One concern seems to be security...but, I believe this is something that the government can work out. Healthcare is of course the priority.

Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners

Adopted by the First United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, held at Geneva in 1955, and approved by the Economic and Social Council by its resolution 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977

Preliminary Observations

1. The following rules are not intended to describe in detail a model system of penal institutions. They seek only, on the basis of the general consensus of contemporary thought and the essential elements of the most adequate systems of today, to set out what is generally accepted as being good principle and practice in the treatment of prisoners and the management of institutions.

2. In view of the great variety of legal, social, economic and geographical conditions of the world, it is evident that not all of the rules are capable of application in all places and at all times. They should, however, serve to stimulate a constant endeavour to overcome practical difficulties in the way of their application, in the knowledge that they represent, as a whole, the minimum conditions which are accepted as suitable by the United Nations.

3. On the other hand, the rules cover a field in which thought is constantly developing. They are not intended to preclude experiment and practices, provided these are in harmony with the principles and seek to further the purposes which derive from the text of the rules as a whole. It will always be justifiable for the central prison administration to authorize departures from the rules in this spirit.

4. (1) Part I of the rules covers the general management of institutions, and is applicable to all categories of prisoners, criminal or civil, untried or convicted, including prisoners subject to "security measures" or corrective measures ordered by the judge.

(2) Part II contains rules applicable only to the special categories dealt with in each section. Nevertheless, the rules under section A, applicable to prisoners under sentence, shall be equally applicable to categories of prisoners dealt with in sections B, C and D, provided they do not conflict with the rules governing those categories and are for their benefit.

5. (1) The rules do not seek to regulate the management of institutions set aside for young persons such as Borstal institutions or correctional schools, but in general part I would be equally applicable in such institutions.

(2) The category of young prisoners should include at least all young persons who come within the jurisdiction of juvenile courts. As a rule, such young persons should not be sentenced to imprisonment.

PART I

RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION

Basic principle

6. (1) The following rules shall be applied impartially. There shall be no discrimination on grounds of race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

(2) On the other hand, it is necessary to respect the religious beliefs and moral precepts of the group to which a prisoner belongs.

Register

7. (1) In every place where persons are imprisoned there shall be kept a bound registration book with numbered pages in which shall be entered in respect of each prisoner received:

(a) Information concerning his identity;

(b) The reasons for his commitment and the authority therefor;

(c) The day and hour of his admission and release.

(2) No person shall be received in an institution without a valid commitment order of which the details shall have been previously entered in the register. Separation of categories

8. The different categories of prisoners shall be kept in separate institutions or parts of institutions taking account of their sex, age, criminal record, the legal reason for their detention and the necessities of their treatment. Thus,

(a) Men and women shall so far as possible be detained in separate institutions; in an institution which receives both men and women the whole of the premises allocated to women shall be entirely separate;

(b) Untried prisoners shall be kept separate from convicted prisoners;

(c) Persons imprisoned for debt and other civil prisoners shall be kept separate from persons imprisoned by reason of a criminal offence;

(d) Young prisoners shall be kept separate from adults.

Accommodation

9. (1) Where sleeping accommodation is in individual cells or rooms, each prisoner shall occupy by night a cell or room by himself. If for special reasons, such as temporary overcrowding, it becomes necessary for the central prison administration to make an exception to this rule, it is not desirable to have two prisoners in a cell or room.

(2) Where dormitories are used, they shall be occupied by prisoners carefully selected as being suitable to associate with one another in those conditions. There shall be regular supervision by night, in keeping with the nature of the institution.

10. All accommodation provided for the use of prisoners and in particular all sleeping accommodation shall meet all requirements of health, due regard being paid to climatic conditions and particularly to cubic content of air, minimum floor space, lighting, heating and ventilation.

11. In all places where prisoners are required to live or work,

(a) The windows shall be large enough to enable the prisoners to read or work by natural light, and shall be so constructed that they can allow the entrance of fresh air whether or not there is artificial ventilation;

(b) Artificial light shall be provided sufficient for the prisoners to read or work without injury to eyesight.

12. The sanitary installations shall be adequate to enable every prisoner to comply with the needs of nature when necessary and in a clean and decent manner.

13. Adequate bathing and shower installations shall be provided so that every prisoner may be enabled and required to have a bath or shower, at a temperature suitable to the climate, as frequently as necessary for general hygiene according to season and geographical region, but at least once a week in a temperate climate.

14. All pans of an institution regularly used by prisoners shall be properly maintained and kept scrupulously clean at all times.

Personal hygiene

15. Prisoners shall be required to keep their persons clean, and to this end they shall be provided with water and with such toilet articles as are necessary for health and cleanliness.

16. In order that prisoners may maintain a good appearance compatible with their self-respect, facilities shall be provided for the proper care of the hair and beard, and men shall be enabled to shave regularly.

Clothing and bedding

17. ( I ) Every prisoner who is not allowed to wear his own clothing shall be provided with an outfit of clothing suitable for the climate and adequate to keep him in good health. Such clothing shall in no manner be degrading or humiliating.

(2) All clothing shall be clean and kept in proper condition. Underclothing shall be changed and washed as often as necessary for the maintenance of hygiene.

(3) In exceptional circumstances, whenever a prisoner is removed outside the institution for an authorized purpose, he shall be allowed to wear his own clothing or other inconspicuous clothing.

18. If prisoners are allowed to wear their own clothing, arrangements shall be made on their admission to the institution to ensure that it shall be clean and fit for use.

19. Every prisoner shall, in accordance with local or national standards, be provided with a separate bed, and with separate and sufficient bedding which shall be clean when issued, kept in good order and changed often enough to ensure its cleanliness.

Food

20. (1) Every prisoner shall be provided by the administration at the usual hours with food of nutritional value adequate for health and strength, of wholesome quality and well prepared and served.

(2) Drinking water shall be available to every prisoner whenever he needs it.

Exercise and sport

21. (1) Every prisoner who is not employed in outdoor work shall have at least one hour of suitable exercise in the open air daily if the weather permits.

(2) Young prisoners, and others of suitable age and physique, shall receive physical and recreational training during the period of exercise. To this end space, installations and equipment should be provided.

Medical services

22. (1) At every institution there shall be available the services of at least one qualified medical officer who should have some knowledge of psychiatry. The medical services should be organized in close relationship to the general health administration of the community or nation. They shall include a psychiatric service for the diagnosis and, in proper cases, the treatment of states of mental abnormality.

(2) Sick prisoners who require specialist treatment shall be transferred to specialized institutions or to civil hospitals. Where hospital facilities are provided in an institution, their equipment, furnishings and pharmaceutical supplies shall be proper for the medical care and treatment of sick prisoners, and there shall be a staff of suitable trained officers.

(3) The services of a qualified dental officer shall be available to every prisoner.

23. (1) In women's institutions there shall be special accommodation for all necessary pre-natal and post-natal care and treatment. Arrangements shall be made wherever practicable for children to be torn in a hospital outside the institution. If a child is born in prison, this fact shall not be mentioned in the birth certificate.

(2) Where nursing infants are allowed to remain in the institution with their mothers, provision shall be made for a nursery staffed by qualified persons, where the infants shall be placed when they are not in the care of their mothers.

24. The medical officer shall see and examine every prisoner as soon as possible after his admission and thereafter as necessary, with a view particularly to the discovery of physical or mental illness and the taking of all necessary measures; the segregation of prisoners suspected of infectious or contagious conditions; the noting of physical or mental defects which might hamper rehabilitation, and the determination of the physical capacity of every prisoner for work.

25. (1) The medical officer shall have the care of the physical and mental health of the prisoners and should daily see all sick prisoners, all who complain of illness, and any prisoner to whom his attention is specially directed.

(2) The medical officer shall report to the director whenever he considers that a prisoner's physical or mental health has been or will be injuriously affected by continued imprisonment or by any condition of imprisonment.

26. ( I ) The medical officer shall regularly inspect and advise the director upon:

(a) The quantity, quality, preparation and service of food;

(b) The hygiene and cleanliness of the institution and the prisoners;

(c) The sanitation, heating, lighting and ventilation of the institution;

(d) The suitability and cleanliness of the prisoners' clothing and bedding;

(e) The observance of the rules concerning physical education and sports, in cases where there is no technical personnel in charge of these activities.

(2) The director shall take into consideration the reports and advice that the medical officer submits according to rules 25 (2) and 26 and, in case he concurs with the recommendations made, shall take immediate steps to give effect to those recommendations; if they are not within his competence or if he does not concur with them, he shall immediately submit his own report and the advice of the medical officer to higher authority.

Discipline and punishment

27. Discipline and order shall be maintained with firmness, but with no more restriction than is necessary for safe custody and well-ordered community life.

28. (1) No prisoner shall be employed, in the service of the institution, in any disciplinary capacity.

(2) This rule shall not, however, impede the proper functioning of systems based on self-government, under which specified social, educational or sports activities or responsibilities are entrusted, under supervision, to prisoners who are formed into groups for the purposes of treatment.

29. The following shall always be determined by the law or by the regulation of the competent administrative authority:

(a) Conduct constituting a disciplinary offence;

(b) The types and duration of punishment which may be inflicted;

(c) The authority competent to impose such punishment.

30. (1) No prisoner shall be punished except in accordance with the terms of such law or regulation, and never twice for the same offence.

(2) No prisoner shall be punished unless he has been informed of the offence alleged against him and given a proper opportunity of presenting his defence. The competent authority shall conduct a thorough examination of the case.

(3) Where necessary and practicable the prisoner shall be allowed to make his defence through an interpreter.

31. Corporal punishment, punishment by placing in a dark cell, and all cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments shall be completely prohibited as punishments for disciplinary offences.

32. (1) Punishment by close confinement or reduction of diet shall never be inflicted unless the medical officer has examined the prisoner and certified in writing that he is fit to sustain it.

(2) The same shall apply to any other punishment that may be prejudicial to the physical or mental health of a prisoner. In no case may such punishment be contrary to or depart from the principle stated in rule 31.

(3) The medical officer shall visit daily prisoners undergoing such punishments and shall advise the director if he considers the termination or alteration of the punishment necessary on grounds of physical or mental health.

Instruments of restraint

33. Instruments of restraint, such as handcuffs, chains, irons and strait-jacket, shall never be applied as a punishment. Furthermore, chains or irons shall not be used as restraints. Other instruments of restraint shall not be used except in the following circumstances:

(a) As a precaution against escape during a transfer, provided that they shall be removed when the prisoner appears before a judicial or administrative authority;

(b) On medical grounds by direction of the medical officer; (c) By order of the director, if other methods of control fail, in order to prevent a prisoner from injuring himself or others or from damaging property; in such instances the director shall at once consult the medical officer and report to the higher administrative authority.

34. The patterns and manner of use of instruments of restraint shall be decided by the central prison administration. Such instruments must not be applied for any longer time than is strictly necessary.

Information to and complaints by prisoners

35. (1) Every prisoner on admission shall be provided with written information about the regulations governing the treatment of prisoners of his category, the disciplinary requirements of the institution, the authorized methods of seeking information and making complaints, and all such other matters as are necessary to enable him to understand both his rights and his obligations and to adapt himself to the life of the institution.

(2) If a prisoner is illiterate, the aforesaid information shall be conveyed to him orally.

36. (1) Every prisoner shall have the opportunity each week day of making requests or complaints to the director of the institution or the officer authorized to represent him.

(2) It shall be possible to make requests or complaints to the inspector of prisons during his inspection. The prisoner shall have the opportunity to talk to the inspector or to any other inspecting officer without the director or other members of the staff being present.

(3) Every prisoner shall be allowed to make a request or complaint, without censorship as to substance but in proper form, to the central prison administration, the judicial authority or other proper authorities through approved channels.

(4) Unless it is evidently frivolous or groundless, every request or complaint shall be promptly dealt with and replied to without undue delay.

Contact with the outside world

37. Prisoners shall be allowed under necessary supervision to communicate with their family and reputable friends at regular intervals, both by correspondence and by receiving visits.

38. (1) Prisoners who are foreign nationals shall be allowed reasonable facilities to communicate with the diplomatic and consular representatives of the State to which they belong. (2) Prisoners who are nationals of States without diplomatic or consular representation in the country and refugees or stateless persons shall be allowed similar facilities to communicate with the diplomatic representative of the State which takes charge of their interests or any national or international authority whose task it is to protect such persons.

39. Prisoners shall be kept informed regularly of the more important items of news by the reading of newspapers, periodicals or special institutional publications, by hearing wireless transmissions, by lectures or by any similar means as authorized or controlled by the administration.

Books

40. Every institution shall have a library for the use of all categories of prisoners, adequately stocked with both recreational and instructional books, and prisoners shall be encouraged to make full use of it.

Religion

41. (1) If the institution contains a sufficient number of prisoners of the same religion, a qualified representative of that religion shall be appointed or approved. If the number of prisoners justifies it and conditions permit, the arrangement should be on a full-time basis.

(2) A qualified representative appointed or approved under paragraph (1) shall be allowed to hold regular services and to pay pastoral visits in private to prisoners ofof his religion at proper times.

(3) Access to a qualified representative of any religion shall not be refused to any prisoner. On the other hand, if any prisoner should object to a visit of any religious representative, his attitude shall be fully respected.

42. So far as practicable, every prisoner shall be allowed to satisfy the needs of his religious life by attending the services provided in the institution and having in his possession the books of religious observance and instruction of his denomination.

Retention of prisoners' property

43. (1) All money, valuables, clothing and other effects belonging to a prisoner which under the regulations of the institution he is not allowed to retain shall on his admission to the institution be placed in safe custody. An inventory thereof shall be signed by the prisoner. Steps shall be taken to keep them in good condition. (2) On the release of the prisoner all such articles and money shall be returned to him except in so far as he has been authorized to spend money or send any such property out of the institution, or it has been found necessary on hygienic grounds to destroy any article of clothing. The prisoner shall sign a receipt for the articles and money returned to him.

(3) Any money or effects received for a prisoner from outside shall be treated in the same way.

(4) If a prisoner brings in any drugs or medicine, the medical officer shall decide what use shall be made of them.

Notification of death, illness, transfer, etc.

44. (1) Upon the death or serious illness of, or serious injury to a prisoner, or his removal to an institution for the treatment of mental affections, the director shall at once inform the spouse, if the prisoner is married, or the nearest relative and shall in any event inform any other person previously designated by the prisoner.

(2) A prisoner shall be informed at once of the death or serious illness of any near relative. In case of the critical illness of a near relative, the prisoner should be authorized, whenever circumstances allow, to go to his bedside either under escort or alone.

(3) Every prisoner shall have the right to inform at once his family of his imprisonment or his transfer to another institution.

Removal of prisoners

45. (1) When the prisoners are being removed to or from an institution, they shall be exposed to public view as little as possible, and proper safeguards shall be adopted to protect them from insult, curiosity and publicity in any form.

(2) The transport of prisoners in conveyances with inadequate ventilation or light, or in any way which would subject them to unnecessary physical hardship, shall be prohibited.

(3) The transport of prisoners shall be carried out at the expense of the administration and equal conditions shall obtain for all of them.

Institutional personnel

46. (1) The prison administration, shall provide for the careful selection of every grade of the personnel, since it is on their integrity, humanity, professional capacity and personal suitability for the work that the proper administration of the institutions depends.

(2) The prison administration shall constantly seek to awaken and maintain in the minds both of the personnel and of the public the conviction that this work is a social service of great importance, and to this end all appropriate means of informing the public should be used.

(3) To secure the foregoing ends, personnel shall be appointed on a full-time basis as professional prison officers and have civil service status with security of tenure subject only to good conduct, efficiency and physical fitness. Salaries shall be adequate to attract and retain suitable men and women; employment benefits and conditions of service shall be favourable in view of the exacting nature of the work.

47. (1) The personnel shall possess an adequate standard of education and intelligence.

(2) Before entering on duty, the personnel shall be given a course of training in their general and specific duties and be required to pass theoretical and practical tests.

(3) After entering on duty and during their career, the personnel shall maintain and improve their knowledge and professional capacity by attending courses of in-service training to be organized at suitable intervals.

48. All members of the personnel shall at all times so conduct themselves and perform their duties as to influence the prisoners for good by their example and to command their respect.

49. (1) So far as possible, the personnel shall include a sufficient number of specialists such as psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, teachers and trade instructors.

(2) The services of social workers, teachers and trade instructors shall be secured on a permanent basis, without thereby excluding part-time or voluntary workers.

50. (1) The director of an institution should be adequately qualified for his task by character, administrative ability, suitable training and experience.

(2) He shall devote his entire time to his official duties and shall not be appointed on a part-time basis.

(3) He shall reside on the premises of the institution or in its immediate vicinity. (4) When two or more institutions are under the authority of one director, he shall visit each of them at frequent intervals. A responsible resident official shall be in charge of each of these institutions.

51. (1) The director, his deputy, and the majority of the other personnel of the institution shall be able to speak the language of the greatest number of prisoners, or a language understood by the greatest number of them.

(2) Whenever necessary, the services of an interpreter shall be used.

52. (1) In institutions which are large enough to require the services of one or more full-time medical officers, at least one of them shall reside on the premises of the institution or in its immediate vicinity.

(2) In other institutions the medical officer shall visit daily and shall reside near enough to be able to attend without delay in cases of urgency.

53. (1) In an institution for both men and women, the part of the institution set aside for women shall be under the authority of a responsible woman officer who shall have the custody of the keys of all that part of the institution.

(2) No male member of the staff shall enter the part of the institution set aside for women unless accompanied by a woman officer.

(3) Women prisoners shall be attended and supervised only by women officers. This does not, however, preclude male members of the staff, particularly doctors and teachers, from carrying out their professional duties in institutions or parts of institutions set aside for women.

54. (1) Officers of the institutions shall not, in their relations with the prisoners, use force except in self-defence or in cases of attempted escape, or active or passive physical resistance to an order based on law or regulations. Officers who have recourse to force must use no more than is strictly necessary and must report the incident immediately to the director of the institution.

(2) Prison officers shall be given special physical training to enable them to restrain aggressive prisoners.

(3) Except in special circumstances, staff performing duties which bring them into direct contact with prisoners should not be armed. Furthermore, staff should in no circumstances be provided with arms unless they have been trained in their use.

Inspection

55. There shall be a regular inspection of penal institutions and services by qualified and experienced inspectors appointed by a competent authority. Their task shall be in particular to ensure that these institutions are administered in accordance with existing laws and regulations and with a view to bringing about the objectives of penal and correctional services.

PART II

RULES APPLICABLE TO SPECIAL CATEGORIES

A. PRISONERS UNDER SENTENCE

Guiding principles

56. The guiding principles hereafter are intended to show the spirit in which penal institutions should be administered and the purposes at which they should aim, in accordance with the declaration made under Preliminary Observation I of the present text.

57. Imprisonment and other measures which result in cutting off an offender from the outside world are afflictive by the very fact of taking from the person the right of self-determination by depriving him of his liberty. Therefore the prison system shall not, except as incidental to justifiable segregation or the maintenance of discipline, aggravate the suffering inherent in such a situation.

58. The purpose and justification of a sentence of imprisonment or a similar measure deprivative of liberty is ultimately to protect society against crime. This end can only be achieved if the period of imprisonment is used to ensure, so far as possible, that upon his return to society the offender is not only willing but able to lead a law-abiding and self-supporting life.

59. To this end, the institution should utilize all the remedial, educational, moral, spiritual and other forces and forms of assistance which are appropriate and available, and should seek to apply them according to the individual treatment needs of the prisoners.

60. (1) The regime of the institution should seek to minimize any differences between prison life and life at liberty which tend to lessen the responsibility of the prisoners or the respect due to their dignity as human beings.

(2) Before the completion of the sentence, it is desirable that the necessary steps be taken to ensure for the prisoner a gradual return to life in society. This aim may be achieved, depending on the case, by a pre-release regime organized in the same institution or in another appropriate institution, or by release on trial under some kind of supervision which must not be entrusted to the police but should be combined with effective social aid. 61. The treatment of prisoners should emphasize not their exclusion from the community, but their continuing part in it. Community agencies should, therefore, be enlisted wherever possible to assist the staff of the institution in the task of social rehabilitation of the prisoners. There should be in connection with every institution social workers charged with the duty of maintaining and improving all desirable relations of a prisoner with his family and with valuable social agencies. Steps should be taken to safeguard, to the maximum extent compatible with the law and the sentence, the rights relating to civil interests, social security rights and other social benefits of prisoners.

62. The medical services of the institution shall seek to detect and shall treat any physical or mental illnesses or defects which may hamper a prisoner's rehabilitation. All necessary medical, surgical and psychiatric services shall be provided to that end.

63. (1) The fulfilment of these principles requires individualization of treatment and for this purpose a flexible system of classifying prisoners in groups; it is therefore desirable that such groups should be distributed in separate institutions suitable for the treatment of each group.

(2) These institutions need not provide the same degree of security for every group. It is desirable to provide varying degrees of security according to the needs of different groups. Open institutions, by the very fact that they provide no physical security against escape but rely on the self-discipline of the inmates, provide the conditions most favourable to rehabilitation for carefully selected prisoners.

(3) It is desirable that the number of prisoners in closed institutions should not be so large that the individualization of treatment is hindered. In some countries it is considered that the population of such institutions should not exceed five hundred. In open institutions the population should be as small as possible.

(4) On the other hand, it is undesirable to maintain prisons which are so small that proper facilities cannot be provided.

64. The duty of society does not end with a prisoner's release. There should, therefore, be governmental or private agencies capable of lending the released prisoner efficient after-care directed towards the lessening of prejudice against him and towards his social rehabilitation.

Treatment

65. The treatment of persons sentenced to imprisonment or a similar measure shall have as its purpose, so far as the length of the sentence permits, to establish in them the will to lead law-abiding and self-supporting lives after their release and to fit them to do so. The treatment shall be such as will encourage their self-respect and develop their sense of responsibility.

66. (1) To these ends, all appropriate means shall be used, including religious care in the countries where this is possible, education, vocational guidance and training, social casework, employment counselling, physical development and strengthening of moral character, in accordance with the individual needs of each prisoner, taking account of his social and criminal history, his physical and mental capacities and aptitudes, his personal temperament, the length of his sentence and his prospects after release.

(2) For every prisoner with a sentence of suitable length, the director shall receive, as soon as possible after his admission, full reports on all the matters referred to in the foregoing paragraph. Such reports shall always include a report by a medical officer, wherever possible qualified in psychiatry, on the physical and mental condition of the prisoner.

(3) The reports and other relevant documents shall be placed in an individual file. This file shall be kept up to date and classified in such a way that it can be consulted by the responsible personnel whenever the need arises.

Classification and individualization

67. The purposes of classification shall be:

(a) To separate from others those prisoners who, by reason of their criminal records or bad characters, are likely to exercise a bad influence;

(b) To divide the prisoners into classes in order to facilitate their treatment with a view to their social rehabilitation.

68. So far as possible separate institutions or separate sections of an institution shall be used for the treatment of the different classes of prisoners.

69. As soon as possible after admission and after a study of the personality of each prisoner with a sentence of suitable length, a programme of treatment shall be prepared for him in the light of the knowledge obtained about his individual needs, his capacities and dispositions.

Privileges

70. Systems of privileges appropriate for the different classes of prisoners and the different methods of treatment shall be established at every institution, in order to encourage good conduct, develop a sense of responsibility and secure the interest and co-operation of the prisoners in their treatment.

Work

71. (1) Prison labour must not be of an afflictive nature.

(2) All prisoners under sentence shall be required to work, subject to their physical and mental fitness as determined by the medical officer.

(3) Sufficient work of a useful nature shall be provided to keep prisoners actively employed for a normal working day.

(4) So far as possible the work provided shall be such as will maintain or increase the prisoners, ability to earn an honest living after release.

(5) Vocational training in useful trades shall be provided for prisoners able to profit thereby and especially for young prisoners.

(6) Within the limits compatible with proper vocational selection and with the requirements of institutional administration and discipline, the prisoners shall be able to choose the type of work they wish to perform.

72. (1) The organization and methods of work in the institutions shall resemble as closely as possible those of similar work outside institutions, so as to prepare prisoners for the conditions of normal occupational life.

(2) The interests of the prisoners and of their vocational training, however, must not be subordinated to the purpose of making a financial profit from an industry in the institution.

73. (1) Preferably institutional industries and farms should be operated directly by the administration and not by private contractors.

(2) Where prisoners are employed in work not controlled by the administration, they shall always be under the supervision of the institution's personnel. Unless the work is for other departments of the government the full normal wages for such work shall be paid to the administration by the persons to whom the labour is supplied, account being taken of the output of the prisoners.

74. (1) The precautions laid down to protect the safety and health of free workmen shall be equally observed in institutions.

(2) Provision shall be made to indemnify prisoners against industrial injury, including occupational disease, on terms not less favourable than those extended by law to free workmen.

75. (1) The maximum daily and weekly working hours of the prisoners shall be fixed by law or by administrative regulation, taking into account local rules or custom in regard to the employment of free workmen.

(2) The hours so fixed shall leave one rest day a week and sufficient time for education and other activities required as part of the treatment and rehabilitation of the prisoners.

76. (1) There shall be a system of equitable remuneration of the work of prisoners.

(2) Under the system prisoners shall be allowed to spend at least a part of their earnings on approved articles for their own use and to send a part of their earnings to their family.

(3) The system should also provide that a part of the earnings should be set aside by the administration so as to constitute a savings fund to be handed over to the prisoner on his release.

Education and recreation

77. (1) Provision shall be made for the further education of all prisoners capable of profiting thereby, including religious instruction in the countries where this is possible. The education of illiterates and young prisoners shall be compulsory and special attention shall be paid to it by the administration.

(2) So far as practicable, the education of prisoners shall be integrated with the educational system of the country so that after their release they may continue their education without difficulty. 78. Recreational and cultural activities shall be provided in all institutions for the benefit of the mental and physical health of prisoners.

Social relations and after-care

79. Special attention shall be paid to the maintenance and improvement of such relations between a prisoner and his family as are desirable in the best interests of both.

80. From the beginning of a prisoner's sentence consideration shall be given to his future after release and he shall be encouraged and assisted to maintain or establish such relations with persons or agencies outside the institution as may promote the best interests of his family and his own social rehabilitation.

81. (1) Services and agencies, governmental or otherwise, which assist released prisoners to re-establish themselves in society shall ensure, so far as is possible and necessary, that released prisoners be provided with appropriate documents and identification papers, have suitable homes and work to go to, are suitably and adequately clothed having regard to the climate and season, and have sufficient means to reach their destination and maintain themselves in the period immediately following their release.

(2) The approved representatives of such agencies shall have all necessary access to the institution and to prisoners and shall be taken into consultation as to the future of a prisoner from the beginning of his sentence.

(3) It is desirable that the activities of such agencies shall be centralized or co-ordinated as far as possible in order to secure the best use of their efforts.

B. INSANE AND MENTALLY ABNORMAL PRISONERS

82. (1) Persons who are found to be insane shall not be detained in prisons and arrangements shall be made to remove them to mental institutions as soon as possible.

(2) Prisoners who suffer from other mental diseases or abnormalities shall be observed and treated in specialized institutions under medical management.

(3) During their stay in a prison, such prisoners shall be placed under the special supervision of a medical officer.

(4) The medical or psychiatric service of the penal institutions shall provide for the psychiatric treatment of all other prisoners who are in need of such treatment.

83. It is desirable that steps should be taken, by arrangement with the appropriate agencies, to ensure if necessary the continuation of psychiatric treatment after release and the provision of social-psychiatric after-care.

C. PRISONERS UNDER ARREST OR AWAITING TRIAL

84. (1) Persons arrested or imprisoned by reason of a criminal charge against them, who are detained either in police custody or in prison custody (jail) but have not yet been tried and sentenced, will be referred to as "untried prisoners,' hereinafter in these rules.

(2) Unconvicted prisoners are presumed to be innocent and shall be treated as such.

(3) Without prejudice to legal rules for the protection of individual liberty or prescribing the procedure to be observed in respect of untried prisoners, these prisoners shall benefit by a special regime which is described in the following rules in its essential requirements only.

85. (1) Untried prisoners shall be kept separate from convicted prisoners.

(2) Young untried prisoners shall be kept separate from adults and shall in principle be detained in separate institutions.

86. Untried prisoners shall sleep singly in separate rooms, with the reservation of different local custom in respect of the climate.

87. Within the limits compatible with the good order of the institution, untried prisoners may, if they so desire, have their food procured at their own expense from the outside, either through the administration or through their family or friends. Otherwise, the administration shall provide their food.

88. ( I ) An untried prisoner shall be allowed to wear his own clothing if it is clean and suitable.

(2) If he wears prison dress, it shall be different from that supplied to convicted prisoners.

89. An untried prisoner shall always be offered opportunity to work, but shall not be required to work. If he chooses to work, he shall be paid for it.

90. An untried prisoner shall be allowed to procure at his own expense or at the expense of a third party such books, newspapers, writing materials and other means of occupation as are compatible with the interests of the administration of justice and the security and good order of the institution.

91. An untried prisoner shall be allowed to be visited and treated by his own doctor or dentist if there is reasonable ground for his application and he is able to pay any expenses incurred.

92. An untried prisoner shall be allowed to inform immediately his family of his detention and shall be given all reasonable facilities for communicating with his family and friends, and for receiving visits from them, subject only to restrictions and supervision as are necessary in the interests of the administration of justice and of the security and good order of the institution.

93. For the purposes of his defence, an untried prisoner shall be allowed to apply for free legal aid where such aid is available, and to receive visits from his legal adviser with a view to his defence and to prepare and hand to him confidential instructions. For these purposes, he shall if he so desires be supplied with writing material. Interviews between the prisoner and his legal adviser may be within sight but not within the hearing of a police or institution official.

D. CIVIL PRISONERS

94. In countries where the law perm its imprisonment for debt, or by order of a court under any other non-criminal process, persons so imprisoned shall not be subjected to any greater restriction or severity than is necessary to ensure safe custody and good order. Their treatment shall be not less favourable than that of untried prisoners, with the reservation, however, that they may possibly be required to work.

E. PERSONS ARRESTED OR DETAINED WITHOUT CHARGE

95. Without prejudice to the provisions of article 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, persons arrested or imprisoned without charge shall be accorded the same protection as that accorded under part I and part II, section C. Relevant provisions of part II, section A, shall likewise be applicable where their application may be conducive to the benefit of this special group of persons in custody, provided that no measures shall be taken implying that re-education or rehabilitation is in any way appropriate to persons not convicted of any criminal offence.

Friday, March 06, 2009

CCTV with recording capability in all interogation rooms - but still not enough....

We definitely need CCTV (with recording capabilities) in all police stations, and if we did have them already, then it would have been so easy to investigate and to find out what really happened to Kugan (died in police custody - starved, burned, beaten...) OR B Parabakar and C Solomon (allegedly tortured in police custody - scalded with hot water) OR Lourdes Mary (denied required healthcare) .

Was the suspect arrested and detained by the police treated according to the law? Well - here is the CD containing the CCTV recordings(with audio) concerning the suspect to prove that all his rights were recognized and respected. This is what happens in Hong Kong, whereby the police do provide the suspect's lawyers copies of the recordings to prove that all was done in accordance with the law...

These CCTV recordings show how the suspect is informed about his rights...how the interogation was carried out ...how the identity parade was conducted, etc..

Time for the Malaysian Police (and maybe the Minister in charge) to run over to Hong Kong and study their very good practice - so that we can implement the same in Malaysia very very soon.

In Malaysia, some police stations already have CCTV - but alas, I found out that they do not have recording ability...and that there is no audio.

Now, the police is saying that they will install CCTV in interogation rooms - and I hope these will have recording capabilities with audio. (and hopefully they will be working in good condition all the time....)

But, it should not just be at the interogation rooms and the lock-ups, it must be all over the police station. In fact, even police cars and vehicles should be equiped with CCTV. Even police officers on duty can be hooked up with CCTV.

Police will install CCTVs in the interrogation rooms of all police stations.

CID Director Comm Datuk Seri Mohd Bakri Zinin said the installation would be done in stages, with state police headquarters and district headquarters as priority areas.

“The logistics are being worked out. Once we have all in place, we will start installing them to avoid any more allegation of abuse or torture.

“The interrogation rooms will have to be redesigned to accommodate the CCTV,” he said after handing over forensic equipment and polylight (ultraviolet light to detect fingerprints and stains) to the police forensics team at the Senior Police Officers College in Cheras yesterday.

Comm Mohd Bakri said the idea to have CCTV-installed rooms was mooted by Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan, who visited several countries recently and found there were special rooms with audio and CCTV recording facilities for interrogation purposes.

Although police had such facilities here, it was confined only to certain lock-ups. - Star, 5/3/2009, Interrogation rooms in police stations to be monitored




PERAK: JC Ridwan Ibrahim got his 'probation' extended another year...

It is rather odd - and goes against the general trend whereby Judicial Commissioners are appointed Judge after 2 years.

In the case of the now famous, Judicial Commissioner Ridwan Ibrahim, his term has been extended for a further one(1) year.

Why was he not made a Judge? What is it that he has done or not done that causes his 'probation' to be extended a further one(1) year?

Maybe, if he does well his duties as 'Judge' in the case involving the Perak Speaker, he will then definitely be made a JUDGE. [See earlier post - PERAK: Judicial Commissioner better behave if they want to become Judges...]

The Minister says that
Ridwan Ibrahim's term was extended, after his 2 year 'contract' expired on 28/2/2009 - but where is the proof of this? Who extends the 'contract'...or the'probation period'? The Minister...the Prime Minister and Cabinet....the Chief Justice...the Yang DiPertuan Agung????

In Malaysia, we have seen how judges who do well - i.e. 'side the government of the day' seem to get promoted and elevated rather fast. Take Augustine Paul, for instance, that infamous High Court Judge of the Anwar Ibrahim trial. Today, he is a Federal Court Judge - and, he surely was elevated speedily all the way to the Federal Court. [But this is Malaysia, and all things are possible. The fear of losing the control of the Executive (and State Governments) saw the quick appointment of a lawyer, too close to UMNO, being made immediately Federal Court Judge, and before GE2008, he was made No. 2 in the Judiciary...Maybe, it was a plan of the UMNO-led BN to at least ensure control of the Judiciary, even if they lose control of the Executive and the Legislative - see earlier post,Fight Corruption in Courts - Get rid of corrupt Judges and court staff...and Zaki Azmi

I am for ending of the practice of appointing Judicial Commissioners - just appoint suitable persons as Judges directly, as has been done before the 1988 Judicial Crisis. No more 'probation Judges'....no more 'contract judges'...there is just too many factors that may infringe into the independence that judges must and should always have...

The tenure of Judicial Commissioner Ridwan Ibrahim, who made an order on March 3 restraining Perak Speaker V. Sivakumar from convening any meeting of the state assembly, has been extended another year from March 1.

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said in the Parliament lobby that Ridwan was appointed as judicial commissioner on March 1, 2007 for a two-year period. The appointment expired on Feb 28 and was extended.

Ridwan’s tenure became an issue when a web-based news agency raised the question whether his order against Sivakumar was valid as his tenure expired on Feb 28.

The order was made in favour of new Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Dr Zambry Abd Kadir and his six executive councillors in a suit they filed against Sivakumar and the Perak state assembly.

Nazri said a judicial commissioner may not be elevated to a High Court judge after two years.

The tenureship could be renewed and elevation made at any time, he added. - Star, 6/3/2009, JC’s term of office extended another year

We