Showing posts with label PKR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PKR. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Will PKR give all candidates access to media - Suara Keadilan & PKR Website...

The requirement for merely a proposer and a seconder to be able to contest would have been so much better than the need to get 2 Division nomination to qualify to contest...Many, who may not be able to get 2 Divisions to nominate, will win the elections because their support lies with the ordinary members in many many Divisions. This would also reduce 'corruption' and allay fears that many Divisions feel about the consequences of nominating the 'wrong persons'. Sadly, there is little lobbying based on real issues...and positions...

PETALING JAYA: PKR is looking to emulate MCA by requiring only a seconder and proposer to qualify for party elections.

PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution said he would propose that the party do away with the minimum two nominations from divisions to qualify.

“MCA’s method is more practical.

“If we can make the amendments to the party constitution, we need not hold multiple meetings for nominations, division polling and central party polling.

“We can hold division and central polling on the same day, just like the state and parliamentary elections that are held concurrently.

“This will help address logistical shortcomings, especially for members living in remote areas in Sabah and Sarawak,” he said in an interview.

Saifuddin said he would propose amendments to the party constitution to scrap the ruling that nominations for central party positions be made during the division AGM. He is also proposing amendments pertaining to AGM notices.

“Now, notices of meetings must be sent individually to members.

“We want to amend it, to put the onus on the members to check the party website for the notices,’’ he said.- Star, 28/9/2010,Sec-gen proposes simpler election rules

It would also be more democratic if all PKR members were allowed to vote - not just those that qualify to attend Division level meetings.

Odd also that allegedly agents of candidates (and candidates) have not been allowed to watch the vote counting process - it should have been open and transparent.

One also wonders whether candidates have been given adequate and equal access to party media. Media, including alternative media seem to be giving a lot of space to Zaid Ibrahim, Azmin, Nurul Izzah.... but what about the other candidates vying for position of Deputy President like Tian Chua,...and other positions. Hopefully, we will not see candidates with lesser nominations pulling out of the race - they should still offer themselves as candidates and let the members choose. For the Deputy President's position, many ordinary members may prefer some person other than Zaid and Azmin - and they should be given the right to choose who they prefer despite the fact that the candidate has only received 2 Divisional nominations, the minimum to qualify to stand for elections.
Maybe, now after nominations, the PKR Website and/or the Suara Keadilan should allow candidates the opportunity to post a statement for members stating why the membership should vote for them. [Or will PKR behave just like the BN by denying candidates access to media...]


Monday, September 20, 2010

PKR GE :- When individual voters do not elect - but results depend on number of nominations

What is happening in PKR resembles what happens in UMNO - and it seems that the number of nominations obtained by the Divisions is more important that the number of votes garnered by a candidate by election by the members. Media reports do not seem to be helping the situation.

What is important is that one gets sufficient nominations, not how many. In fact candidates who already have the required number of nominations should just tell Divisions to cease nominating them....in fact, maybe even not nominating anyone if they have no other candidates to nominate. The current trend between the 'Zaid-Azmin'  number of nominations fight will only be bad...for many Divisions may just be be wanting to end up in the 'correct' side to avoid UMNO like discrimination after the elections. Let the voters make the final decision.[That is why, I believe that when it comes to nominations, all that should be required is the nomination by 2 (or a certain number of) members. Let the members vote in their leaders...in a 'secret ballot' - not an open declaration by Divisions of their preferences, which really may be governed by other factors not merely preferences.

Zaid Ibrahim's contest for PKR deputy president has gone up several notches after Penang's Batu Kawan and Tasek Gelugor, Pahang's Maran, Paya Besar and Temerloh and Negeri Sembilan's Rembau along with Malacca's Tangga Batu and Sabah's Putatan cast their nominations for the former minister in their respective meetings today.

azlanWith these additional nominations, Zaid, who is also Federal Territory PKR chief, has gathered support from a total of nine divisions Saturday.

The latest tally this evening brings the total nominations today for Zaid to 19, as compared to Azmin's eight for the day so far.

Azmin stlll blazes ahead, however, with a total 36 nominations. - Malaysiakini, 19/9/2010, Zaid closing in on Azmin in No 2 nominations


Is the Azmin-Zaid a proxy fight between Anwar and some other, given the fact that Anwar still do not have the guts to face the PKR electorate and get their mandate to lead the party. Sad, that Anwar wants to remain leader unelected....He should just contest the position of President. If there are to be party 'advisers', etc - then this should be Past Presidents (or maybe Past Deputy Presidents or old leaders of the party). Azmin, after all is but Anwar's personal political assistant for years...

Zaid, on the other hand is a former UMNO's 'favourite' son. He, after all, was the few that was given a Senatorship so that he can be made Minister after the last General Elections. Being from Kelantan, his political future was bleak  in UMNO for it is a real uphill task for PAS to be ousted there....

Personally, I believe it would be best for PKR if some other than Zaid or Azmin is chosen as the PKR's No. 2. Maybe, Syed Husin should chose to get into the competition...Maybe, some other 'Reformasi' leader should be elected. Maybe, even some person from a different ethnic group from the 'Supreme Leader' and President should be elected to prove that PKR is not a race/religious party but a Malaysian party

PKR supremo Anwar Ibrahim is adamant about staying out of the contest for the post of president at the upcoming party elections.

He thanks the divisions that nominated him, but added that he will not reconsider his decision that he announced on Sept 14.

NONE"This is my final stand. I am not ready to reconsider it,” he said at an open house in Guar Perahu, Penang, today.

Anwar said he had very strong reasons not to contest the position, since his spouse Wan Azizah Wan Ismail had led the party since its founding in 1999
. - Malaysiakini, 19/9/2010,
Anwar adamant on staying out of PKR race






Given, that now in 2010, there is no legal impediment to Anwar contesting in a democratic election for the position of PKR's leadership, one  wonders why he wishes to cling on to the unelected leadership position, and keep his spouse as the Party president.

After the next General Elections, if the Pakatan Rakyat wins with PKR having the most number of seats, will our new Prime Minister be the democratically elected President of PKR - or will she just hand over the position to her husband? Many, I believe may prefer the wife to the ex-UMNO Deputy President (and former PM) ...and why not? After all, if she is democratically elected as President we know also that she has the support of the PKR membership....[Maybe, Anwar will be satisfied with the role of Advisor then...]. By staying out of the elections, Anwar will not also be able to show that he has the majority support of PKR members, would he not....when did they ever elect him? Is it fear of losing that keeps Anwar out ... it is after all easier to convince the Supreme Council to choose him...that to get the membership of PKR to choose him? Maybe, there should be a PKR referendum to see whether the membership really wants him to lead...

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

PKR :- Democratic party? Multiracial Party? A party of ex-BN persons? UMNO-lite?

Will PKR members be able to go beyond the issue of ethnicity, religion, wealth and be able to choose leaders who have good principles and values (and maybe even a past history of action for what is good and right for all persons in Malaysia [ not just PKR members/cronies])

Is PKR really a multi-racial party? Well...to date, there seem to be only persons from one ethnicity vying for the top three (or more) positions...

If Dr Syed Husin Ali decides not to stand for the post of Deputy President - would is also be the indication of the end of PRM's effective presence, given the fact that there was a merger between the two. Looking at those fighting for No. 3 (which really is the number 2 position), it looks like it is going to be a fight between 2 ex-BN...ex-UMNO personalities....and this is sad, for PKR seem to be turning out to be another party of ex-BN members - not really a new alternative party...[Well, apparently, he has decided not to contest, and it is sad - who will be No.2 now??] Syed Husin will not defend PKR No 2 post, Syed Husin chooses not to defend PKR post

To contest for a supreme council position, one needs the nominations of 2 Divisions, and this means that many may never be able to contest...at least at the highest level. Nominations by 2 members should have been the requirement ....of maybe even a defined number of individual members, like say 10 or 20 or even 50 members...The UMNO-like BN-like political culture that has permeated PKR will have its effects, and many good persons may never get nominated...given the the nomination by 2 Divisions requirement. It should be easy to get your name in the ballot - for after all, at the end of the day it is the members that choose. Maybe PKR should consider further amendments to the nomination requirement. [Let us re-look at the UMNO elections, where some one like Ku Li also could not get on the ballot because no other UMNO Division had the guts to go against the incumbents - but if it only needed 2 members to nominate, it would certainly have been different, and there would be an elected President of UMNO...]. I bet that many who want to be in the Supreme Council is now out 'begging' persons who can get Divisions to nominate them ...will there be money involved? Will there be promises of this and that involved?

What do these people who stand for elections stand for? Today, maybe nothing at all, and the only question may be whether they are in Team 'A' or Team 'B' or... are aligned to this person or that person...That would explain why many in PKR leadership really have (and expresses) no 'own' voice and 'own' opinions...and  tend to only repeat what Anwar has said...or what other Pakatan Rakyat leaders have said.So many of PKR leaders have blogs but alas many just post media reports...and very few actually take the time to express his position/views on matters of concern. Media reports are after all what the newspapers pick and publish - and certainly we all know that many a time it publishes what it wants not what a speaker had stated in full. [To be reported in the media is no big deal - and if one does post such reports, maybe one should also comment further on what never got reported...etc..including elaborations..]

Some time back a friend from UMNO lamented about the quality of UMNO's (and BN parties) new members. He said that many joined the party...and fought to get higher up in the party hierarchy just for the contracts, the projects, the money, etc.. No more did people join because they believed in the party ideology...and wanted to promote it, or even make contribution to improve party ideology/position on certain matters...I wonder whether given the fact that many in PKR are formerly from UMNO and other BN parties, are they also here in PKR for the same reasons...?? 

Anwar wants to remain 'Supreme Leader' - an unelected position, and will not want to contest for any of the democratically elected positions.?  Maybe, then there should be elections for the Supreme Leader's position too... In 2007, there was a reason...but that reason is no more in 2010...

Back in 2007, Anwar accepted nominations for the party presidency and was pitted against his wife and incumbent Dr Wan Azizah Ismail and another little-known party member Abdul Rahman Othman for the post.

Anwar and Abdul Rahman both withdrew from the contest at the eleventh hour and Wan Azizah won the post uncontested.

Anwar claims that his withdrawal was necessary because the Registrar of Societies threatened to dissolve the party if he was elected, because he was ineligible to hold party post for five years due to his corruption conviction.

Following this, the party congress in 2007 agreed to make him the de facto leader of the party. - Malaysiakini, 14/9/2010,
Anwar will not accept nominations for any post




Accountability and Transparency - Will there be candidates calling for the revelation of Local Council Income and Expenditure Accounts? State Government...State Department Income and Expenditure Accounts?....

But then....it is just another political party in Malaysia --- and today, it really is no more seen as that 'Reformasi' party - but just another party dominated by a lot of ex-BN party members at all levels... Malaysians will be watching to see who gets nominated...and who gets chosen as leaders...and the outcome will affect the perception of many.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Will PKR reward 'party hoppers'? Or will they choose persons with long history of fighting for human rights, justice, ..?

There seem to be a lot of people (within PKR and otherwise) that is lobbying for Zaid Ibrahim to be fielded as the PKR candidate in the upcoming Hulu Selangor by-elections.

I personally hope that he is not the candidate that PKR chooses - Why? Because he is a 'very recent' party hopper from UMNO (and BN), who suddenly seem to have been struck by a 'lightning of conscience' who started 'voicing out' when ISA was used against MP Teresa Kok and some others. I do not think he has much of an history standing up for justice and human rights before this. I do not remember him as being a lawyer that stood for human rights as a member of the Bar. He may have changed - but it is best that we give him some time, at least 5 - 10 years, before we put him up as an MP for PKR - surely there are so many others that are better qualified, and who have a very long history of fighting for change, for human rights, for justice, for the people....
 
In March 2008 elections, Zaid Ibrahim stood as an UMNO/BN candidate and lost. I wonder whether we have the tapes about what he said about the Opposition during the election campaign.
 
Now, despite losing, he was chosen by the UMNO Prime Minister to be made a Senator and a Minister - that tells you a lot, does it not.
 
Zaid Ibrahim, being a Kelantanese UMNO man, really did not have much of a political future within the UMNO/BN if was to contest in Kelantan - hence, not much of a 'sacrifice' to jump over to PKR ...whereby, he really has been 'rewarded' too much - to be sky-rocketed into the position of PR Coordinator, and even there is talk that he may be made the No.2 [3] in PKR after Anwar, Wan Azizah...
 
There is a lacuna in the PKR leadership because PKR itself has filed to project other leaders - spending too much time and effort promoting just one man, his wife and maybe his 'close associates'. I believe that there are more than sufficient persons within the PKR that can be the current leaders and future leaders. But alas, PKR seems to be 'side-lining' even the former Reformasi leaders, the ex-PRM leaders, civil society leaders - preferring rather to promote the more recent party-hoppers from BN. Look and see who are the speakers at the recent PKR ceramahs - Zaid, Chua.... 
 
The people are watching, and we shall see who Pakatan Rakyat fields as its candidate in this upcoming by-elections... Will some UMNO/BN party-hopper be getting their 'reward' for jumping? Or will it be a candidate with a long history of working for 'reformasi' (change), human rights and justice? I do not forsee the Opposition bringing about much changes, if most of their leaders/MPs/ADUNs were really former UMNO/BN persons...all we can then hope, is a mere change of 'faces' but no real changes that will benefit the people.    

We shall see...we shall see...
 
PKR is "most likely" to field supreme council member Zaid Ibrahim in the Apr 25 Hulu Selangor parliamentary by-election if the BN names MIC deputy president G Palanivel as its candidate, according to party insiders.

NONEThey said PKR may change its candidate at the 11th hour if the BN decides not to field Palanivel.

"As for now, what I heard is that Zaid Ibrahim (right) still tops the list of being the best PKR candidate for the by-election. Zaid still carries 'national weight' despite being an outsider and is seen by PKR as the best candidate to challenge the BN.

"However, there could be a change (in the candidate) if the BN decides not to field Palanivel," one party insider told Bernama.

He felt that Zaid and Palanivel would be the ideal candidates as both had served the federal government administration.
NONEZaid, who was expelled from Umno in December 2008, was a minister in the Prime Minister's Department in charge of legal affairs and judicial reform while Palanivel (left) was the deputy minister of Women, Family and Community Development.

"It would be only appropriate if a Datuk fights a Datuk, a heavyweight fights a heavyweight," the insider said.

Another insider said fielding Zaid would be most favourable to PKR in light of the constituency's recent voting pattern.

"Zaid is a recognisable face. Everyone knows him and he is quite popular with the non-Malays as well. Furthermore, Zaid is seen as a principled politician, since he was willing to resign as a minister. People respect him for this,” he said.
Meanwhile, sources claimed that PKR's intention to field Zaid reflected the party's anticipation that the BN would field a political heavyweight.

The Hulu Selangor seat fell vacant following the death of the Member of Parliament, Zainal Abidin Ahmad of PKR, on Mar 25.

In the 2008 general election, Zainal Abidin defeated Palanivel by a 198-vote majority. Hulu Selangor has 63,593 voters.

The BN has announced that it would nominate a candidate from the MIC to contest the seat.

The candidate is expected to be identified on Apr 15, two days before nomination for the by-election.

Speculation is rife that Palanivel, 61, who had been Hulu Selangor MP from 1990 to 2008, would be fielded once again as the BN candidate although there is some clamour for a younger candidate.- Bernama - Malaysiakini, 11/4/2010, PKR to field Zaid if BN chose Palanivel



Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Must be a PKR candidate - becos PKR seat - it is so Barisan Nasional

Well, we have a by-election - and it saddens me that PKR is saying that it is a PKR seat, and hence it will be fielding a P"KR candidate. It is so BN... [Remember, that these were all PAS, DAP, PRM seats before PKR came into being...]

I believe that the best candidate must be fielded - not a PKR candidate...maybe not even a Pakatan Rakyat (PKR-DAP-PAS) candidate. It could be a PSM candidate...maybe even a PRM candidate...or even a Human Rights Party candidate ...or just some other person from the civil society or the communitywho has a proven 'history' of fighting for human rights and justice...

We want the best candidate - and the Opposition must be open (and not be seen taking  a  'protecting my turf/seat' position).

Maybe, we should be placing an Orang Asli candidate - for after all, there is no Orang Asli MP.

Maybe a social activist, who have been working for the community - the people for years and years.

What are the other things that one look at? Ethnic composition of the constituents. Some PKR person in 2008 told me that Temerloh had a Malay majority - so they had to field a  Malay candidate. I was so disappointed with that 'answer', because this was PKR (that multi-ethnic multi-religious party - that is blind to skin colour) - for there really is no place where the majority are from the other than Malay ethnic groups - thanks to the way the UMNO-led BN has divided the Parliamentary Constituencies..

Find the best person - someone with an history of working for rights, justice and peace...

PKR candidate - I am worried as many PKR elected reps have jumped ship - maybe, it should be some other person.

Sometime - what they want is a PKR 'yes person' or Pakatan Rakyat 'yes person' - some person who will not challenge the current party leadership and will be subservient. Many of the Pakatan Rakyat MPs/ADUNs seem to just 'disappear' - just not there taking up or fighting for any issues or causes. We want MPs/ADUNs that are strong...and would be out there championing issues and causes (best if it is someone who has a 20 plus year history of doing this...)

Now, they want a Dr Halili Rahmat - I googled his name - and found out that he is Dato' Dr. Halili Bin Rahmat, MBBS (Mal) FRACS (Neurosurgery) - in Sime Darby's Subang Jaya Medical Centre. Well, a doctor for the rich... and will he really have time to attend Parliament and serve his constituents. Background: - Is he from UMNO - those that followed Anwar out into PKR? Has he got a history of being involved in issues affecting the poor...the ordinary people. I have not heard of him before this...and could not find any blog of his - which would have been good to see what he is about - his views, etc ...Wonder also about his 'Dato-ship' - when did he get it. Was it on recommendation of the UMNO-led BN? [I really do not know Halili - and I hope that those who do will tell me[and the readers] more about this doctor.He may be a good person with a long history of standing up and fighting for rights...]


I believe that we should find a people's person to be the MP - someone who have been involved in issues or rights and justice for a long time - not some Dato...Dr.. 'professional' - maybe we need an ordinary person..


As I said, let us not be trapped in party-self centredness - PKR seat ....so we need a PKR member. If that be the case, then the door is closed for all who are not PKR, DAP, PAS...members. DAP has in the past picked 'non-members' to stand under the DAP ticket - Pick the best person to be the MP...

A noted neurosurgeon, Dr Halili Rahmat, is fast emerging as PKR's choice as candidate for the upcoming by-election in Hulu Selangor.

dr halili rahmat anwar doctor 130904 pcBorn in Ulu Yam, he is known to be a close associate of PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim.

Halili (right) is currently the PKR Hulu Selangor division treasurer.

He has had had two outings on the hustings, but with no success.

In 1999, he contested the Hulu Selangor parliamentary seat, but lost to MIC deputy president G Palanivel.

In 2004, he stood for the Batang Kali state seat, but lost to Umno's Zainal Abidin Sakom by 8,828 votes.

However while Halili's professional credentials are respectable enough, PKR's Hulu Selangor division is also considering its vice-chief Razali Mokhtar as a candidate also.

Razali, born in Batang Kali, is an engineer in his 40s. He was the former general manager of Bumi Highway.

When contacted, a senior leader said the two names - and one more yet to be decided - will be submitted to the top leadership within two days.

The party is expected to discuss the candidacy at Wednesday's political bureau meeting.

It had been earlier speculated that the candidate could likely be national-level leaders such as Youth chief Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin, Selangor PKR deputy chief Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud, who is also MTUC president and Pakatan Rakyat coordinator Zaid Ibrahim.

Choice of candidate
Several top party leaders refused to speculate about the various named being floated.
PKR vice-president R Sivarasa (below) reiterated the party stance that the candidate selected will be the one with the best chance of winning.

NONE"The party will take into account various factors including his/her background, experience and qualifications; the demography of the voters; the particular characteristics of the constituency; views of coalition partners; and all other relevant factors.

"No one of these factors by itself determines who the candidate should be," he said when contacted.
The Hulu Selangor seat was made vacant due to the death of PKR's Zainal Abidin Ahmad, 71. He succumbed to brain cancer on March 25.

This will be the 10th by-election since the 2008 general election, with Pakatan Rakyat having had the better of Barisan Nasional in the overall outcome.- Malaysiakini, 29/3/2010, By-election: PKR to field neurosurgeon?

Monday, November 16, 2009

PKR still relies on slogans without making definite real commitments for change

There comes a time when general ideas will no longer be enough... We want to know specifics...i.e. what exactly are you going to do...

I went to the Parti Keadilan website, and looked at what they are fighting for ... and I could not see much of a difference from what the Prime Minister and the BN is fighting for...

**Building a society that is just and a country that is democratic, progressive and for unity amongst people irrespective of race and/or religion
- How does it differ from what the BN government is saying
- Save for Perak, where Nizar had elections for traditional kampungs for them to chose their own leaders (and Chang Lih Kang had elections for 1 Kampung Baru) - there seem to be nothing much to bring greater democracy even in the states that Pakatan Rakyat rules, or even the constituencies that are under the Pakatan Rakyat. Local Council elections also have been forgotten after they came into power. Senators - people could have democratically chosen or indicated their preferences - but alas, this was not done and the parties picked their own Senators...

Universal Health Care - is the PKR fighting for this? Not sure.

Will they be repealing the Official Secrets Act? Not sure. Apparently local councilors also had to take the oath of secrecy. And a perusal of the websites of Local Councils, Pakatan State Governments see not much of this openness, transparency, ...

Will the ISA and Detention Without Trial Laws be repealed immediately (set time frame please)... or will they not do so when they come into power...and then use it to arrest and detain its own political opponents.

Will the RELA be abolished - or not?

Will Death Penalty be abolished?

Will they set up immediately the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC)?

Will tols be abolished? mmm...that was good for election campaigns - but when they came to power, they forgot about it..

Anwar has declared war.... to retain Selangor - but, unless PKR and Pakatan go beyond slogans...and commit to real things that they will do, people may not again support them.

For after all, the only difference between BN and the Pakatan seems to be the personalities involved.

DAP and PAS is more clear in the positions that they take...but alas PKR likes slogans and general principles without disclosing specifics...This has to change.


Parti Keadilan Rakyat adalah sebuah parti politik yang berjuang membentuk sebuah masyarakat yang adil dan negara yang demokratik, progresif dan bersatu-padu kepada semua rakyat tanpa mengira bangsa ataupun agama.






Matlamat dan asas perjuangan politik kami termaktub di dalam 17 perkara di bawah:


1. Membentuk masyarakat yang adil dan negara yang demokratik, progresif dan bersatu-padu;
2. Menyemai rasa hormat untuk sistem Raja Berperlembagaan, memperkukuhkan Demokrasi Berparlimen dan menyokong hak dan kuasa rakyat, serentak dengan usaha berterusan untuk meningkatkan rangka politik negara sesuai dengan harapan dan kepentingan rakyat;
3. Mengasaskan dan menyemai kedaulatan undang-undang, media dan kehakiman yang bebas serta institusi keselamatan yang mendaulatkan prinsip-prinsip professionalisme;
4. Menjamin kebebasan berfikir, bersuara, bergerak, berhimpun dan berpersatuan untuk semua;
5. Mendaulatkan Islam sebagai agama Persekutuan sambil menjamin hak bukan Islam untuk beragama dan berfikir, dan untuk memperkembangkan peranan agama dan nilai-nilai sejagat demi menegakkan kebenaran, keadilan, tatacara berakhlak, kemanusiaan dan kemuliaan insan;
6. Menjamin Bahasa Malaysia sebagai bahasa kebangsaan dan bahasa rasmi, sambil menjamin hak semua warganegara mengguna, mempelajari dan dididik dalam bahasa-bahasa lain; dan menyemai pembangunan kebudayaan dan kesenian Islam berasaskan unsur-unsur penting warisan kebudayaan yang ada di negara ini;
7. Memperkembangkan sistem Persekutuan yang adil, bertanggungjawab dan demokratik yang mengimbangi kepentingan negeri-negeri dengan kuasa kerajaan Persekutuan;
8. Memperkasakan kemuliaan insan, nilai-nilai keinsanan dan budaya penyayang, mendaulatkan hak asasi manusia, dengan komitmen teguh terhadap prinsip kewibawaan dan akauntabiliti dalam bidang-bidang ekonomi, politik dan pentadbiran;
9. Membentuk ekonomi yang adil dan dinamik, yang mementingkan pertumbuhan dan juga pengagihan yang saksama, yang bebas daripada ketidakadilan, yang tidak bertepatan dan pembaziran, sambil mengatasi kemiskinan dan mencegah kekayaan tertumpu pada satu-satu pihak;
10. Menjamin, berasaskan prinsip keadilan, kedudukan kaum Melayu dan Bumiputera di Sabah dan Sarawak digunakan semata-mata untuk meningkatkan status sosio-ekonomi mereka yang miskin dan terpinggir, dan keperluan yang saksama dibuat untuk golongan miskin dan terpinggir bukan Melayu dan bukan Bumiputera, ke arah mencapai keadilan untuk perpaduan nasional;
11. Memberikan kemudahan sosial seperti pendidikan, kesihatan, perumahan, dan kenderaan awam pada kos berpatutan sesuai dengan tanggungjawab sosial kerajaan, terutamanya buat kumpulan berpendapatan rendah dan sederhana;
12. Memperkembangkan dan melindungi hak bekerja, gaji yang saksama, keselamatan di tempat kerja dan kualiti kehidupan untuk semua;
13. Memperkukuhkan kedudukan wanita dalam masyarakat, menyemai dan melindungi hak-hak dan kepentingan mereka dan menjamin yang mereka dapat menikmati status sama rata dan tidak menjadi mangsa diskriminasi dan eksploitasi;
14. Menyemai hak belia dan pembangunan penuh potensi mereka dan menjamin penglibatan bermakna belia dalam segala lapangan kehidupan;
15. Membaiki mutu kehidupan Orang Asal sambil menghormati adat resam mereka, melaksanakan program pembangunan yang sesuai menerusi perundingan dengan mereka, dan melindungi hak mereka ke atas Tanah Adat mereka;
16. Melindungi alam sekitar daripada kerosakan, mengelakkan pencemaran sambil meningkatkan kualiti alam sekitar dan memastikan pembangunan bersifat lestari;
17. Menggalakkan sistem antarabangsa yang saksama dan demokratik, melaksanakan dasar luar yang bebas dan beretika, membina persekitaran yang sesuai untuk masyarakat bermaklumat yang boleh menghadapi cabaran globalisasi sambil menolak unsur-unsur proses globalisasi yang mengancam kepentingan rakyat, negara dan umat manusia, dan melindungi ekonomi, politik dan keselamatan negara daripada dikiblatkan kepada kepentingan kuasa-kuasa besar dunia. - PKR Website


Why am critical of PKR and the Pakatan Rakyat? It is because I still have hope that there will be changes...real changes...real REFORMASI.

The sad thing about PKR may be the fact that many of their leaders are all ex-BN...and they have inadvertently brought in the BN way of thinking...and of doing things. PKR's objectives and principles are so like the BN, and like the BN it is vague...and it does not commit to anything specific..

And they continue taking in ex-BN people ...and elevating them to leadership positions. Heard that they now want to make that ex-UMNO...ex-BN Minister Zaid Ibrahim into PKR's number 2. Look at his history...Remember that Zaid Ibrahim was a UMNO man that lost in the last General Elections, and he is from Kelantan (and as such, taking into account that the chances of BN winning Kelantan is very slim). I do not think he had much of a political future in UMNO, and in fact he may not even have got a seat come next elections.

It was good that he apparently repented, and took a stand against the usage of ISA last year, and quit...but are we sure that he has changed, or he is just out seeking political glory...now that the tide is moving away from BN. [Or, is he here to break PKR and Pakatan - remember in Perak one BN adun jumped over....and then jumped back again with sufficient ADUNs to enable Perak to go to BN? - this may be far-fetched]

Has Zaid suddenly transformed into a 'new man' - fighting now for justice and human rights? I wonder...for only time will tell. There must be a 'cooling off' period of ex-BN jumpers - they should be thrust into national leadership positions until maybe 3 years or so...

The absorbing of BN leaders and making them PKR leaders overnight is also not good for PKR - for soon, the question would be whether PKR is really different from the BN.

Thus, it is important that a significant number, i.e. at least 80% of its national leadership should NOT be ex-BN leaders. I believe that PKR's Deputy President Syed Husin Ali should continue to be the PKR's Deputy President(the No. 3), with Anwar being No. 1 and his wife being No. 2. Hopefully, we will not be having his long time political assistant becoming the No.3 or some ex-UMNO Minister who just jumped becoming the No. 3.

But most importantly, PKR must commit to real specific changes that it will bring about - and when it will be done...


Sunday, June 14, 2009

'Buying' Zaid Ibrahim and other ex-BN people with gifts of 'positions' into PKR must stop - it is betrayal of the Rakyat...

Why is PKR out to woo former UMNO Ministers....and make a big deal when they do join PKR - even maybe appointing them to PKR's Supreme Council? Is Parti Keadilan Rakyat so desparate?

Remember these are persons who were part of the UMNO-led Barisan Nasional - not just ordinary members - but the chosen ones ...the leaders - made MPs ...made Senators...made Ministers - and now so glad is PKR when they come over...

Who are we trying to replace? It makes little sense if we 'welcome with open hands' ....and even give them great gifts and positions....these persons from that 'evil' BN...Soon PKR will be filled will these ex-evil-BN leaders, who will be the leaders in PKR, who have 'repented the wrongs they did'...and have now transformed into good persons with the correct values, concern for justice and human rights?

Malaysians want a change - not just a name change, i.e. BN to PR but real changes that will benefit the people. They(them BN) were the 'enemy' before - but when they fall out with the current leaders of UMNO/BN parties or seem to have not much of a political future in the UMNO/BN parties ....and they jump over - Guess what Anwar Ibrahim himself and the main leadership are out there with open arms 'welcoming' them -- and not just with open arms - but hands laden with gifts as well. Come next elections, I will not be surprised that these former UMNO, MCA, GERAKAN, MIC leaders will be given the chance to run for Parliamentary seats ....what nonsense...Remember, the Rakyat is not stupid - and political parties are not like English Premier League football teams...

Let them who want to jump come over, jump - and let them be just normal members for a while, and let it be policy that they will not be given the chance to run as an Opposition ADUN/MP in the coming GE - maybe, the GE after ... we will see....we will see.

Surely Malaysian civil society, Reformasi Movement, and even the Opposition Parties have persons not just of calibre, but also a long history that shows their commitment to justice, human rights, etc - these are the ones that must be chosen and promoted now within the political parties...These are the ones who have struggled for change for decades - but now Anwar, PKR and some of the other PR parties seem to be just concentrating on 'party hoppers' from BN parties...

Who is Zaid Ibrahim? He has been around for a very long time - and suddenly he says something 'good' recently and we place him on our shoulders and proclaim him leader for Reformasi...for Makkal Sakti... for Change...Sometime, after mid-2008, he started singing a different tune...and resigned from Cabinet...was then got himself sacked from UMNO. What about all that time before that? In less than a year, Zaid Ibrahim from being an UMNO/BN person has changed and now Anwar (without even consulting the President and the Supreme Council of PKR) has already announced that he will be appointed as a member of the Supreme Council...Beware. Look at his history...Remember Perak...

Remember Rais Yatim - when he was in Semangat 46 - he clearly took a position for the repeal of the ISA (and Detention Without Trial Laws) - he was even amongst the lawyers who drafted the Memorandum of the Malaysian Bar for the repeal of these draconian laws. He also wrote a whole treatise about the evil of ISA, .... and, then, he went back to UMNO/BN...the Government, and he played us all out - he is now for the keeping of Detention Without Trial Laws...

Remember Ku Li - when there was a split in UMNO, and the formation of Semangat 46, we foolishly raised him up as the 'head' of the Opposition Front - and, he too, betrayed all when he went back to UMNO...

Then, we had Anwar Ibrahim(the DPM) who had a falling out with Mahathir (the PM) - and again we have raised yet another ex-UMNO person as 'our hero' - our leader of the Opposition Front...and will we be betrayed again?

I worried when I see that Anwar seemed to be only raising 'Azmin Ali' (a former political assistant, a former UMNO person) as his number 2 - after all, Azmin was made the Whip...now there is talk of making Zaid Ibrahim as the 2nd in Command.

Is not that good man Syed Husin Ali, the 2nd in Command in PKR - or is he now only number 3? Or, is he in reality maybe no. 4 or maybe just number 15...Is PKR a democracy? Is it the Supreme Council that decides...or is it just Anwar that decides, and the Supreme Council just agrees...

PKR needs to promote from within his ranks at least 5 -6 persons (or more) as its leaders, and these must not be the ex-BN persons...(It is sad that even on the logo at PKR's website - we see only one face, i.e. the face of Anwar. In 2004 GE, it was Anwar and Wife...surely this must change...PKR's main logo should have the faces of Syed Husin and other leaders - faces that will reflect that it is a multiracial multi-religious multi-cultural party - not just the face of Anwar...

Former law minister Zaid Ibrahim, who quit the cabinet and was subsequently sacked from Umno last year, has joined opposition party PKR today.
MCPX

The announcement was made by PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim at the PKR extraordinary congress in Bangi, Selangor this afternoon.

pkr egm 130609 zaid ibrahim join party 02Anwar said that Zaid’s membership in PKR will help boost the party because “he is known for his bravery in defending human rights and the independence of judiciary".

...
Anwar said Zaid will soon be appointed as a member in the party’s powerful supreme council and its political bureau, pending approval from PKR president Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail...

He was however not picked to defend his seat at the 2008 general election after falling out with party chieftains in Kelantan.

Nevertheless, he was appointed a senator by former prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in March 2008 and was brought into the cabinet
- Malaysiakini, 13/6/2009, Ex-Umno minister Zaid joins PKR

Another case in a report, just one day later, in Malaysiakini...
Despite his attempt to express his loyalty to Gerakan, it is learnt that Huan would meet PKR supremo Anwar Ibrahim during next week's parliamentary sitting to discuss a possible move to the Pakatan Rakyat coalition.

Sources said Huan was positioning himself for a strong deal with the PKR leadership to ensure that he would join PKR at a high level.

Since he was a Gerakan vice-president, Huan and his colleagues would definitely seek some senior positions in PKR. - Malaysiakini, 14/6/2009, Huan to stay put in Gerakan after all



Anwar Ibrahim the "Ketua Umum Parti"[General Leader of the Party] - is this an elected position or a 'for life' uncontestable position?

I have been wondering about the position being held by Anwar Ibrahim - and so I went to the PKR Website, and it showed Anwar as being the "Ketua Umum Parti"[General Leader of the Party], and he seems to be listed even above the Party President, who is Datuk Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, and the Deputy President, Dr Syed Husin Ali.

Majlis Pimpinan Tertinggi (2007 - 2010)
Ketua Umum Parti
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (URL)
Presiden
Datuk Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail
Timb. Presiden
Dr Syed Husin Ali
Naib Presiden
Sdr Azmin Ali
Dr Lee Boon Chye
Sdr Mustaffa Kamil Ayub
Sdr Sivarasa Rasiah
Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan
Setiausaha Agung
Dato' Salehuddin Hashim
Timb. Setiausaha Agung
Sdr Abdul Halim Mohamed Yussof
Sdr Jonson Chong
Sdri Suzana Manja Ibrahim
Bendahari
Sdr William Leong
Timb. Bendahari
Tengku Maraziah Tengku Sulaiman
Ketua Penerangan
Sdr Chua Tian Chang @ Tian Chua
Pengarah Pilihanraya
Hajjah Zainon Jaafar
Timb. Pengarah Pilihanraya
Hajah Fuziah Salleh
Pengarah Strategi
Sdr Saifuddin Nasution Ismail
Pengerusi Tetap
Haji Hishamuddin Ismail
Timb. Pengerusi Tetap
Sdr Khazizi Ahmad
Ahli-Ahli MPT
Sdr Dominique Ng Kim Ho
Dr Badrul Amin Bahron
Dr Mansur Othman
Sdr N. Gobalakrishnan
Dr Zaleha Mustafa
Sdr Mohd Yahya Sahri
Sdr Johari Abdul
Sdri Irene Fernandez
Sdri Christina Liew
Kapt (B) Usaili Alias
Dato Dr. Zainal Abidin Ahmad
Sdri Latheefa Koya
Sdr Saiful Izham Ramli
Haji Osman Abdul Rahman
Sdr Badrul Hisham Shahrin
Sdr Ansari Abdullah
Sdri Animah Ferrar
Sdr Khalid Jaafar
Sdr Zakaria Abd Hamid
Sdr Cheah Kah Peng
Sdr Omar Jaafar
Sdr S. Manikavasagam
Sdr Ang Hiok Gai - PKR WEBSITE


I wonder whether this is an elected position - or is it a for life position?

How was Anwar Ibrahim made the "Ketua Umum Parti"[General Leader of the Party]. Did the membership vote for him? I think not. Maybe, it was the Supreme Council that elected him...

Who is this "Ketua Umum Parti"[General Leader of the Party]? Is he above the Party President. Is he the de fracto PKR President? After all, he behaves like the Party President, and we have really heard very little from the Party President herself. She resigned her MPship - and Anwar is the new MP for that area, and have also taken over as the Opposition Leader in Parliament.

Some say Anwar is really not a member of PKR - and that is why he is just an 'Advisor' of the party - this "Ketua Umum Parti"[General Leader of the Party]. Some say that he still his a 'wrongly expelled UMNO member' with aspirations to return to UMNO, with the ability to claim that he never once betrayed UMNO by consciously joining any other political party. In a recent interview on Thai TV, I was shocked when Anwar said that he abandoned his idea of returning to UMNO only 4 years ago (mmm that would make it 2005...), and that is very disturbing.

These are doubts best clarified by Anwar himself...we need Anwar to be clear that he is with Pakatan Rakyat (and against the UMNO led-BN), and that he would not suddenly lead his team of ex-UMNO, ex-MCA, ex-MIC and/or ex-Gerakan people from the PKR and return back to UMNO and the BN...

I belive he should just be Party President - and maybe, Wan Azizah should just resign as President - and Anwar should just stand for President of the party, and be 'elected' by all its members, so that it can be said that he leads PKR with the mandate of all its members. To date, his position cannot be said to have the mandate of the about 300.000 PKR members. [Or maybe, there is no provision for the elections if the President suddenly resigns...]

There has been major constitutional reforms made at the recent PKR General Meeting, and maybe this should also have been considered. What is the term of the office of "Ketua Umum Parti"[General Leader of the Party]? Can one person hold this position for a maximum of 3 terms of 3 years each? Is this an elected position?

Sadly, the Constitution of PKR (or its newly amended constitution) was not there in the PKR Website...Maybe, someone can help direct me to where I could get hold of this Constitution?

PKR delegates at the party’s extraordinary national congress today gave their stamp of approval to major constitutional changes after four and a half hours of “lively debate” held behind closed doors.
MCPX

pkr egm bangi zaid ibrahim joins pkr event 130609 21According to party communications director Jonson Chong (left in photo), 1,064 representatives from all states, as well as those from the youth and women’s wing, “voted overwhelmingly in favour of change and democracy”.

“After an emotional vote-counting process, the votes in favour of the reforms numbered 941, with 103 against and 9 abstentions,” said Chong at the end of the one-day special meeting which was held at the Selangor International Islamic University in Bangi.

Among the key amendments are:

  • Direct elections for divisional and central leadership positions.

  • Change of terminology for divisions and branches (from ‘bahagian’ to ‘cabang’, and ‘cawangan’ to ‘ranting’).

  • Implementation of a policy of 30 percent involvement of women in all levels of the party’s leadership.

  • Reduction of the age limit of the Youth wing to 35.

Chong said that the delegates voted in favour of all the amendments “en bloc”.
- Malaysiakini, 13/6/2009, PKR delegates back bold amendments

Sunday, March 29, 2009

NO DAP flags, materials for 3 by-elections - ABSURD

No DAP flags and materials for these 3 by-elections is absurd.

We all know Pakatan Rakyat is PKR, DAP and PAS..

See earlier post :Only PAS flag, materials (maybe speakers later) allowed for Bkt Gantang by-elections - so UNJUST

Monday, March 23, 2009

Is Najib's desperation the cause of the suspension without reason of Harakah and SK?


The suspension of PAS's Harakah and PKR's Keadilan for 3 months - with no reasons given is really so undemocratic..

The Home Ministry has suspended the organs of two opposition parties - PAS' Harakah and PKR's Suara Keadilan - for three months, effective immediately.

MCPX
With the suspension, both newspapers will not be able to publish until the end of June, missing out on a number of crucial political events including the three by-elections on April 7. - Malaysiakini, 23/3/2009, Harakah, Suara Keadilan banned 3 months

I saw the letter from Home Ministry that was sent to Wan Azizah, President of PKR, which was dated 23/3/2009, and I see that there was no reasons given for the suspension. [The letter could be seen in Malaysiakini]

It certainly looks like UMNO-BN is really worried - and wants to cut communications between Opposition parties and the people.

The mainstream print-media generally take a pro-UMNO-BN stance, and to get the perspective of the Opposition parties, many usually read the Harakah, and recently also the Suara Keadilan.

What about the internet media? Well, the truth is that many still rely on print media for their information....and the suspension will cause a 'black-out' to the truth (or to the PAS and PKR's version of the truth...) for 3 months, and it will affect the coming by-elections, and more importantly the possible change in the Premiership of Malaysia.

The Prime Ministership cannot be handed over like a baton in a relay race...but that seems to be the way it is going to happen, possibly some time in April. See my earlier posting :-
Golden Opportunity if Pak Lah Resigns - MPs can determine new PM - Anwar? Najib? Kit Siang?

And, remember that the Prime Minister need not be the President of UMNO. Someone else can be the Prime Minister.

There are many, even within UMNO, who do not want Mohd Najib Razak to become the next Prime Minister...

There may be MPs in BN who do not want Mohd Najib Razak to be the PM...

Hence, there should never be the presumption that since BN numbers outnumber the Opposition MPs, that all the BN MPs want Mohd Najib Razak as the next Prime Minister - or that they want the current PM to resign.

Recently, with the preventing of one of the 3 Deputy President candidate contesting, namely one Mohd Ali Rustam, who did manage to get 46 UMNO Division nominations, one wonders about the support that Mohd Najib Razak will still be having. Note that this man had more votes than even Muhyiddin in 2004...
During the 2004 Umno election, Mohd Ali won one of the three vice-president seats when he secured the second highest vote with 1,329 votes behind the former Federal Territories Minister, Tan Sri Isa Abdul Samad (1,507). The other winner was Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin (then Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister) who secured 1,234 votes.

Last November, Mohd Ali received 46 nominations to contest the Umno Deputy President's post, together with Muhyiddin (now International Trade and Industry Ministry), and Rural and Regional Development Minister Tan Sri Muhammad Muhd Taib. -
Bernama, 17/3/2009, Profile Of Mohd Ali Rustam

Would this barring of some candidates, all seemingly not allied with Najib, have an impact on the support of the UMNO MPs in parliament when it comes to choosing the next Prime Minister. See my earlier posting,'Corruption' and Discrimination in UMNO - Has the report to MACC against Ali Rustam (and KJ) been made?

There can be NO assumptions this time around that all BN MPs want Mohd Najib Razak to be the Prime Minister. The determination of whether Mohd Najib Razak has the requisite support of the majority can and should only be made after Abdullah actually resigns.

But will Parliament still be sitting? Or like Perak, will the Yang Di-Pertuan Agung call in MPs, one after the other, to determine who they support to be the next PM. Will Mohd Najib Razak be there in the room when this is done - or will he like Nizar be kept out? If he is on the room, some MPs may be too scared...and may just lie saying that they support Mohd Najib Razak...

Maybe, Mohd Najib Razak should just remain Deputy Prime Minister for some time to come...

The suspending of the alternative print media - the Harakah and the Suara Keadilan, would surely deprive the Malaysian people of views and opinions about very important things that will be happening in Malaysia in the next few months...

The non-giving of reasons is also very unjust and wrong - surely some reasons must be given.

Many persons employed by these publications directly and indirectly, and those who earn a living by distributing/selling, will lose their jobs and/or earnings - and this again is not at all right.

I urge the Malaysian Government, the Home Minister, to immediately revoke this suspension of permits in the name of democracy and justice.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Pakatan Rakyat will take over from BN - but do we still want it?

Change of Federal Government after 50+ years from the UMNO-led Barisan Nasional (previously the UMNO-led Perikatan/Alliance) to the NEW Pakatan Rakyat government is something that we are all waiting for...

The perception that Anwar Ibrahim had gone around proclaiming that this would happen on 16 September 2008 - and the fact that it did not happen on that date has greatly affected the credibility of Anwar Ibrahim and the Pakatan Rakyat.

But Syed Husin Ali has now assured us that it will indeed happen...
If (the power transfer) is not tomorrow, it will be the day after tomorrow; if it is not in the near future, it will be in the 13th general election (due 2013),” PKR deputy president Dr Syed Husin Ali declared today.

Opening the annual congress of the party's Youth and Women’s wings this morning, the party’s No 2 conceded a lot of people were “disappointed” when the much-talked about Sept 16 plan did not take place.

However, he blamed the powers-that-be for allegedly using underhanded tactics and asserting pressure on BN lawmakers who were purportedly planning to defect to the opposition, such as monitoring their movements through the police Special Branch.- Malaysiakini, 28/11/2008, PKR: There will be change of gov't
So, it did not happen on 16 September, and it is good that Syed Husin says that it will happen...but the when still remains a mystery. We may have to wait for the next General Elections...or maybe even the elections after that.

Many of us will just be happy with a change in the Federal Government - not really bothered whether there will be any real change in policies, the way things are done, etc..

First thing, they say is that we must have a change of the Federal Government...

BUT then we must not ignore that the Pakatan Rakyat have already managed to change amnd form government in 5 very important States - and the people are looking to see whether there is any real significant change or not. To date, safe for that a bit of 'free water' in Selangor and the elections of leaders at the kampung levels in Perak, there seems to be not much changes.

Local Council Elections -- that was a 'promise' made, but that has not happened.

At least in Perak, they did allow the people to chose the local village/kampung level leaders.

I say again, they can have elections to choose the kampung level, taman level, kampung baru level...leaders at the very least...even if they do not want to have the Local Council Elections yet. There can be elections to choose the Penghulu,...even Senators.

It is all possible...and not doing it is indicative that the quest of PKR (or PR) is for the seat of power...not so much to bring about real changes.

Now, they say that the ISA and Detention Without Trial Laws will be repealed, petrol prices slashed, tol done away...blah...blah..blah - BUT will it happen when the PR finally take power.

Is there really any difference in those 5 States, that the PR has taken over? Maybe, I should just say 4 - since Kelantan has already been long in the control of PAS - now Pakatan Rakyat.

There are many issues in Malaysia. How will Pakatan Rakyat handle it? - the same way as being done by the BN, or differently...We are not hearing much about this? And we cannot say that this is because the media is 'censoring' - not now...not in this time and age when we have so many alternatives...

There has also recently been some criticism about this, and the fact that there is not even a 'shadow cabinet' of the Pakatan Rakyat.

There has also not been any steps to formally register the 'Pakatan Rakyat' - the developing of a common Pakatan Rakyat symbol, etc.. Will they still be running as DAP, PAS and PKR? Are there more parties in Pakatan Rakyat now? Is PSM part of Pakatan Rakyat?

Pakatan Rakyat rules 5 States - and is on the verge of taking over the Federal Government, and as such there must more than just 'campaigning' and 'slogans' ...and trying to get MPs to jump over.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

ACA DG 'leaps into the fire from the frying pan' on that 2 PKR State Exco issue...

ACA DG's effort to try convince Malaysians that arrest of the 2 PKR State Exco members 'has nothing to do with politics' just further reinforces the believe that the ACA may have sold its soul to the 'devil'.

If it was a normal usual arrest for the purposes of investigations - there would not have been a Press Statement issued. Remember, they are just suspected of being involved is some corruption at this stage. Are they corrupt? Well, the ACA is still investigating. Maybe they are just persons who may be able to assist in the ACA investigations - i.e. witnesses.

Oh yes, the police/ACA do not just arrest suspects - they also arrest witnesses (or people who, they believe, will be able to help in the investigations) - strange, is it not?

As I mentioned earlier, a notice requiring the attendance to assist in the investigations would have been sufficient - no necessity really to arrest at this stage. They did not do an 'Anwar' by not turning up after being notified that their presence is required to assist in some investigation.

And would these persons now arrested and being detained, i.e. them EXCO members (and the others) run and flee the country....I do not think so.

Do the police/ACA have the power to arrest and detain persons like this -- oh yes they do have - and that is why the law must be reformed --- amended. (See my earlier post for some of my suggestions for reform).

Even if you did arrest, there was no need to go to the media and publicize it --- ACA cannot deny this because they did prepare and issue a Kenyataan Media (Media Statement) - which went into details of the alleged corruption being investigated. Why? [Malaysiakini did publish the full statement]

Remember - in the case of Anwar - there was great secrecy about the contents of even Saiful's police report (which is a public document) - but here the whole world knows almost the full details of the alleged crime.

Now, ACA DG comes out again today in the press saying that the arrest and its timing had nothing to do with politics...This attempt to salvage spilled milk just makes matters worse for the ACA..
The arrest of the two Perak executive council members by the Perak Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) has nothing to do with politics, the agency’s Director-General Datuk Ahmad Said Hamdan said Thursday.

He said he was disappointed with allegations by certain quarters who accused the agency of deliberately detaining the two men when there was by-election fever in the country. “I am disappointed when the ACA is accused of conspiracy, scheming with the ruling party, that is not true. This is a criminal case. We have nabbed many people ... Director-General of Immigration and senior police officers. - Star Online, 21/8/2008 - ACA DG: Arrest of Exco members not politically motivated

He should not have even come out and responded - or is it just a case of 'siapa makan cili dia rasa pedas' (he who eats chily will feel the chilly hot - a very bad translation).

Here, he goes further and apparently blurts out to the press --- we have proof - and that the ACA have conducted investigations for 3 months

WHY is the DG of the ACA telling us all this now?

The investigation is still on-going, and the arrest is to facilitate investigations into determining the truth. Is the DG now implying that they are really the 'suspects', and not just witnesses?

The proof is there so we arrest them,” he told reporters after attending a forum titled ‘Independent Anti-Corruption Commission: Towards Effectively Combating Corruption and Enhancing Integrity’ at the Integrity Institute of Malaysia here Thursday.

Ahmad Said said the ACA conducted investigations on both the Exco members for more than three months and it was a coincidence that the arrests were made close to the by-election.- Star Online, 21/8/2008 - ACA DG: Arrest of Exco members not politically motivated

If the proof is there, why not just charge them in court? End of story...

What you are doing now is violating the rights of the 2 PKR State Exco members, and them others. You are slinging mud at them in the wrong forum - it is becoming a trial by media.

The proper way of doing things is investigate - and if there is sufficient evidence, then charge them in court - and bring forth all them evidence in court. Let them who have been charged defend themselves in court.

The ACA and its DG should not be going to the media at this stage - it is not at all proper.

From the frying pan, the ACA DG has jumped into the fire -- and now, I believe, that more people are going to believe that the whole arrest and the timing of the arrest is really politically motivated.

I fully agree with the DG when he says “Just because of the election (it does not mean) we put aside the case till later...." - but there is proper way of doing things...

Is it becoming the trend that DGs are now going to the media and making statements with regard to on-going criminal investigations. If I am not wrong, the Health DG(Merican) also went to the media even before Anwar was charged... now we have the ACA DG.

I believe that the fumble on the part of the ACA, and now its Director General is significant enough for the ACA DG to be removed, or for him to resign.

It is most important that ACA be seen as independent - and not politically motivated.

ACA must also be professional...and behave professionally....and I believe that they have failed here.

And guess what, this issue is already being used by the BN in its campaign in Permatang Pauh....
...Citing the arrests of two PKR Perak executive councillors by the Anti-Corruption Agency yesterday, he [Khairy Jamaluddin - the Prime Minister's son-in-law] chided the opposition party for being inconsistent in their graft-busting campaign... -Malaysiakini, 21/8/2008 - Khairy: We've come to 'bury' Anwar


In any event, even if the 2 are found guilty ultimately by a fair and open court, some bad apples would not make the whole bunch bad...

OR....would the other saying be more appropriate - 'It is just the tip of the iceberg...

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Freedom of expression within political parties and coalitions...

Must all member parties of the BN or the Pakatan Rakyat have the same opinions, views and positions about everything?

Must all members, MPs or ADUNs of a particular political party have the same opinion, views and position about everything under the sun?

In the past, when the BN was of the position that Detention Without Trial and the ISA, etc were OK - I remember that at one time Gerakan stood firm and took a differing position - i.e. for the abolition of the ISA and other laws that allow Detention Without Trial. This was great........but with time things seem to have changed and Gerakan too just became another obedient 'lamb' and followed the rest of BN.

But after GE2008, there seems to be changes that have been happeing in the various BN component parties - an assertion of their differences, and brave expression of different views and positions on various matters.

For example on the arrest and detention of Uthayakumar and the 4 others under ISA, I believe that to date the GERAKAN, the MIC and the MCA have openly called for the immediate release of the HINDRAF 5 from ISA detention.

GERAKAN seem to be be going back to become the "old GERAKAN"- reclaiming its independent thinking and expressing it openly.

Post GE2008, after the major losses suffered by the BN, BN component parties seem to be re-evaluating matters, and it is not unforseeable that even the BN - that mighty BN may be dis-integrating. One indication was that during the announcement by Abdullah Ahmad Badawi that BN was victorious after the GE2008 results - missing were the leadership/reps from the component parties of the BN. It seemed to be just UMNO there.

There is nothing permanent of the BN and its member parties - and, it is also not uncommon that some parties may chose to just be no more a member of the BN, or even any other coalition.

Maybe, some parties may see that being alone for a while may also be good for the party revival not only with regard to membership BUT more importantly its own party identity and positions.

The question of Gerakan leaving the Barisan Nasional is “open for discussion” but the party will not be “blinded by emotions” over the issue, acting president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon said.

“Other coalition parties have also discussed it. We are not a ‘yes man’ party but we will not be blinded by emotions. We will have an objective analysis of such discussions from time to time.

“Gerakan won’t blindly commit to Barisan, but since Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and his deputy Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak have shown sincerity in bringing change we will perform our role in accordance with our principles,” he said.

“Barisan is a coalition that represents people from different political and cultural backgrounds, so there are bound to be differences. Even Pakatan Rakyat is the same.” - Star, 20/8/2008 - Koh: Gerakan not blindly loyal


Party grassroot members have found their voices at last (or maybe the leaders are finally listening to the grassroots). Fear will no longer hold them captive, and there are calls for internal political party reforms, and even reforms in the relationship between the various BN component parties within the BN itself.

We saw that MCA, MIC and even GERAKAN leaders are learning how not to obediently 'kow tow' or surrender their independence and freedoms this time around. Good first step was the refusal to accept the goodies offered by the PM in the form of them Ministerial positions.

Who is in the Cabinet is ultimately decided by the PM? - and hence this refusal to accept cabinet positions will help preserve their independence when they sit in for their BN meetings as the head honchos of their respective political parties.

Being in the Cabinet can, I believe, compromise their frankness and independence as party reps, for there will always in their minds be that concern about being removed from Cabinet and/or demoted.

Well, now, it seems that things may be changing within the BN - and they seem to have adopted consensus decision making system (not a very practical manner, better to have a 2/3rd or 4/5th majority decision making process.) - and the BN seems to be doing more consulting and more meetings now. Will this mean, that there will be an end of the UMNO dominance, or what some say the 'UMNO dictatorship" of the BN. [Let us be wary also that these may be all 'lies' to woo the voters of Permatang Pauh]

“What is important is that we try to reach a consensus. In the last five months, top Barisan leaders have held more meetings than in the last three years,” he said, adding that response from the Chinese community has been more positive in the Permatang Pauh by-election compared with the March 8 general election.- Star, 20/8/2008 - Koh: Gerakan not blindly loyal

For that, we shall all wait and see - but then UMNO itself is not so interested to practice real democracy within itself - that high quota requirement to even stand as a candidate is certainly not true democracy. There has also been calls within UMNO that all the members be given the right to vote for the leaders at the highest level - which means removing the power of choice that is now vested in Divisional reps only. (It is easier to 'bribe' a smaller number of Divisional reps compared to the all the million over members....)

We need to understand and appreciate the problems that BN has been facing, and is facing today - so that this new coalition of parties called the Pakatan Rakyat will not also end up breaking-up in the near future because of similar reasons. There is thus a need to discuss matters NOW - not only after the seizing of power.

Some previously vocal persons, who have now been elected MPs or ADUNs (or appointed Local Councillors) have now stopped expressing themselves...and/or championing causes and issues. It is so sad.

I say it is right for individuals within a party to have and express a different personal opinion from that of the party they belong to. Of course, it must always be made clear that 'despite the fact that they do have a different opinion, they will still adhere the the current party position'. Staying silent, and not expressing your difference is unacceptable. Anwar's silience then about the 1987 Operation Lallang, the 1988 Judicial Crisis, ... is and was unacceptable

But alas post-1998, Anwar has presumably repented his old ways and is a new man today - and that is what many, including me, would like to believe.

Thus, I say that if you are a member of one of the Pakatan Rakyat, it is perfectly alright and very good if you do also come out and express your 'personal' differences in opinion, always stressing, of course, that it is just your 'personal' opinion.

So, how many of you Pakatan MPs, Pakatan ADUNs, and Pakatan appointed Local Councillors out there is all out for Local Council elections now - as soon as possible, and is against this current appointment.

SAPP has lost confidence in the current PM and government - and is right and proper for them to express this view....and they should not be sanctioned for expressing this position. It is a minority position ... or is it really. After all, some parties may still be fearful...or even still slave of the old BN culture...

After all this PM has the position that BN members are not allowed to even support good suggestions of the Oppositions - and are required to fully support all BN positions. And MPs and others who have been different were sanctioned and disciplines - Devamany, etc... [Devamany now plays it very safe waiting for Big Boss Samy to come out first, and then only repeat the same position...]

Is the Pakatan Rakyat different? Would Pakatan member parties be allowed to hold different party positions BUT one Pakatan Rakyat position?

Would members of the Pakatan Rakyat member parties be permitted to hold different views, and express them BUT have only one party position? [Of course, there may be certain very important matters where members may not have the right to express publicly a different position - or should there even be such a limitation or restriction??? - that is for the Pakatan Rakyat members to decide]

Today, when it comes to the Pakatan Rakyat - there is confusion as to what exactly is the Pakatan Rakyat position.

Are the utterance of Lim Kit Siang or Anwar or Hadi the Pakatan Rakyat position?