Well, another issue is allegedly arising which shows that this Barisan Nasional government is too free in using Malaysian's money .... KLIA2 Airport Terminal was supposed to cost RM2 billion - and the government approved this, but now it seems that the total cost could be as high as RM5 billion. If there was a cost increase of maybe 10% or 20% more than the earlier cost, one may say that this is reasonable but what is being disclosed is outrageous - RM3 billion more...
Fernandes had said when KLIA2 was first proposed, MAHB said it would cost RM2 billion, a figure that was later revised to RM2.6 billion and later to RM4 billion, with talk now that the total cost would be high as RM5 billion.
"That makes no sense - the low-cost terminal will now cost much more than KLIA. Yes, I asked for a new terminal but one that has simple facilities.
Malaysians need to be given answers - and maybe it is time to change the CEO and the people in charge of MAHB and the building of the airport. Why the extra cost? As it is there is already a low-cost terminal - and now Malaysia, in times when it says that it is in 'dire straits', more money is being wasted...
All these money could have been better used in maintaining those necessary food subsidies and other subsidies, which when taken away has resulted in an inreased cost of living - and increased cost. 1 jug of sugar cane water at the Bazaar Ramadhan in Temerloh now cost RM4, last year it was RM3. Last year, one could get 4 kuih for RM1, but today you get 3 (and sometimes just 2) for RM1.
There should be an immediate independent inquiry about the increases of the cost of building KLIA2 - In fact, if maybe it was handled by Tony Fernandez, it may have been much much lower... Is MAHB wholly owned by the Malaysian government and other staturory bodies like KWSP, LUTH, etc - or is it also owned by certain private individuals and corporation. When Malaysian government money is spent, why should it also benefit individuals and private corporations. In fact, all GLCs ownership should be studied, and private persons and corporations should not be owning these 'safe shares'...
In fact, we need Parliamentary Oversight Committees that is made up of both Opposition and government MPs and .Senators monitoring such projects and their expenditure, who should have public hearings from time to time....so all Malaysians will know that all is well and our monies are being spent wisely..
AirAsia must shift to KLIA2, insists MAHB
Utusan Malaysia today quotes MAHB managing director Bashir Ahamd as saying any refusal to move to the new airport does not arise as the terminal was built for AirAsia, on top of accommodating increase of passengers.
"When the terminal is completed, (it) must move. The present low-cost terminal will be closed once KLIA 2 is opened," Bashir is quoted as saying.
In an interview with Business Times last month, new AirAsia chief executive officer for Malaysia Aireen Omar (left) said the no-frills carrier had a "back-up plan" should it decide not to move to KLIA 2 if it failed to meet the airline's requirements.
Aireen had said that AirAsia had hubs at Kota Kinabalu, Kuching and Senai as well as a virtual hub in Changi, Singapore.
Two days after the interview was published, AirAsia group CEO Tony Fernandes, who has since moved his office to Indonesia to oversee the carrier's regional expansion, lamented at the slow pace on work on KLIA 2 and the excessive cost overruns.
Fernandes had said when KLIA2 was first proposed, MAHB said it would cost RM2 billion, a figure that was later revised to RM2.6 billion and later to RM4 billion, with talk now that the total cost would be high as RM5 billion.
"That makes no sense - the low-cost terminal will now cost much more than KLIA. Yes, I asked for a new terminal but one that has simple facilities."These cost overruns are matched by delays in the completion date from the original 'up and running' date of September 2011 to the first, and later, the second quarter of 2012.
"Well, here we are and construction is only half-done. We have been told the terminal will only be operational by the first quarter of next year at the earliest, or possibly early 2014. But I wouldn't hold my breath," Fernandes (right) had said.
However, MAHB's Bashir told Utusan Malaysia that KLIA 2 would be operational by April next year and that MAHB would no longer entertain any request for changes to the airport design to prevent further delays.
Aside from AirAsia, he said, the other airlines that would operate out of KLIA2 are Cebu Pacific Air, Mandala Airlines, Tiger Airways and Airphil Express. Negotiations with Jetstar and Lion Air were still going on.
Bashir also denied in the report that the cost of the KLIA 2 would balloon beyond the estimated cost of RM3.6 billion to RM3.9 billion. - Malaysiakini, 11/8/2012, AirAsia must shift to KLIA2, insists MAHB
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment