Now, that Paul Low, the President of Transparency International Malaysia has been appointed a Minister in Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak, it is only proper and right that he immediately resigns as President of Transparency International- Malaysia.
In fact, no one that is serving in government, or sitting in any government appointed Commissions should be holding positions executive positions in organizations such as Transparency International.
I hope that Paul Low will do the needful to reduce corruption within Najib's government, and will stick to his principles and values. We hope that he will not turn a 'blind-eye' to corruption, but would act to EXPOSE and eliminate it, and get rid of all the bad apples within the cabinet and the government who are involved in corruption. Do not assist in 'cover ups'.
Maybe one of the first things that Paul Low should do, is to make ensure Najib's cabinet's full cooperation in this Scorpene affair. Make sure that full access is given to all necessary documents, and full cooperation by Malaysia. We all do not want corruption.
Hopefully, Paul Low will be the de facto Anti-Corruption Minister, and with him in there Malaysia will fare better in the 2013 Transparency International Corruption Perception Index and score at least 80. The media statement issued by Paul Low in December 2012 is attached below.
|
|
Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) is
an independent, non-governmental and non-partisan organisation
committed to the fight against corruption. TI-M is registered with the
Registrar of Societies Malaysia and is the accredited National Chapter
of the Berlin-based Transparency International.
|
|
PRESS STATEMENT
5 December 2012. Issued in conjunction with the worldwide
launch of the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2012.
Transparency International (TI) today released its Corruption Perceptions
Index (CPI) results for 2012. The assessment was made for 176 countries based
on the upgraded methodology which allow for more accurate year by year
comparison. Instead of scores ranging from 1 to 10, the new CPI 2012 scores
range from 0 to 100 (0 being most corruption and 100 be corruption free). As
the methodology is an upgraded version, the results are therefore not
comparable with previous results. See attachment for full results of the
survey.
For the CPI 2012 the following are the ten top scores:
Rank
|
Country
|
2012 CPI Score
|
2011 GDP per Capita (US $)
|
1
|
Denmark
|
90
|
59,684
|
1
|
Finland
|
90
|
49,391
|
1
|
New Zealand
|
90
|
32,620 *
|
2
|
Sweden
|
88
|
56,927
|
3
|
Singapore
|
87
|
46,241
|
4
|
Switzerland
|
86
|
80,391
|
5
|
Australia
|
85
|
60,642
|
5
|
Norway
|
85
|
98,102
|
6
|
Canada
|
84
|
50,345
|
6
|
Netherlands
|
84
|
50,087
|
* 2010 figure
Malaysia’s score is 49 with a country ranking of 54, together
with Czech Republic,
Latvia, and Turkey. Malaysia’s position continues to be
in the mid-range average, indicating that while many steps have been undertaken
under the GTP/NKRA initiatives, the respondents have not experienced a
significant decrease in corruption. One very telling indicator of the feeling
on the ground is the result of TI‘s Briber Payers Survey which asked companies
in Malaysia: “During the last
12 months, do you think that your company has failed to win a contract or gain
new business because a competitor has paid a bribe?. 50% answered
“Yes”, the highest score among the 30 countries surveyed (See results
attached). This is an extraordinarily high response and may indicate that
corruption in the public sector is systemic and in some areas institutionalised.
More bold measures must be taken to eliminate entrenched interests and
processes that support abuses. Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) is of
the view that to achieve substantial improvements in our fight against
corruption the following actions are necessary:
1. Reforms in the political arena to reduce monetisation
of politics and eliminate opportunities for state capture which results in
grand corruption
2. Continue to strengthen law enforcement institutions
especially the MACC, Judiciary and Police. Their complete independence must be
established to secure the public’s trust
3. Uphold the rule of law without fear or favour so that
abusers especially “big fish” cases do not have impunity from prosecution
4. Overhaul the Official Secrets Act (OSA) and introduce
a federal Freedom of Information (FOI) Act
5. Firm and consistent actions in upholding transparency
and accountability in public procurement
6. Tackle systemic corruption by focusing on specific
sectors through the involvement of all stakeholders. For example, a coalition
involving CIDB, contractors, professional bodies and other regulators in the
construction industry could be established to drive the initiative to reduce
corruption
7. Further improve whistleblower legislation to provide
wider protection to whistle blowers and encourage more whistle blowing
We must redouble our efforts to fight corruption on
all fronts, as the consequences to our country and its economy will be dire if
we lose this battle. TI-M urges all stakeholders including the civil service,
private sector, enforcement agencies and members of the public to play our part
in saying NO to Corruption.
Issued by
Transparency International Malaysia
Datuk Paul Low, President Contact
No.: +6017 876 2550
|
2 comments:
I completely agree with you.
Here is Transparency InternationaI's guiding principle No. 3: "We will be democratic, POLITICALLY NON-PARTISAN and non-sectarian in our work."
Paul Low must resign as President of TI-M. There is no other way TI can remain "non-partisan" Every time their president speaks he will be perceived as speaking for the Malaysia Govt. That is the exact opposite of "non-partisan". If he remains President of TI-M he cannot avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. His current public perception as a man of integrity will be eroded.
I completely agree with you.
Here is Transparency International's guiding principle no. 3: "We will be democratic, POLITICALLY NON-PARTISAN and non-sectarian in our work."
Paul Low must resign as President of TI-M. There is no other way TI can remain "non-partisan" Every time their president speaks he will be perceived as speaking for the Malaysia Govt. That is the exact opposite of "non-partisan".
If he remains President of TI-M he cannot avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. His current public perception as a man of integrity will be eroded.
Post a Comment