See related posts:-
Use of draconian Sedition Act against movers of Bar Motion after Resolution adopted is wrong?
Lawyers who proposed action against Apandi to be investigated for sedition (Star, 29/3/2016)
Cops probing lawyers over Malaysian Bar motion calling for AG’s resignation (Malay Mail)
Bar:- PDRM Must Respect the Statutory Duties of the Bar Council and the Statutory Rights of Members of the Malaysian Bar
Bar Council calls for Bukit Aman rally over sedition probe on lawyers
BY BOO SU-LYN
Wednesday March 30, 2016
04:33 PM GMT+8
KUALA LUMPUR, March 30 — The Bar Council has called on lawyers to gather at the federal police headquarters in Bukit Aman tomorrow when four lawyers will be questioned under the Sedition Act 1948 over a Malaysian Bar motion urging the Attorney-General to resign.
- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/bar-council-calls-for-bukit-aman-rally-over-sedition-probe-on-lawyers#sthash.1xut6f8o.dpuf
Wednesday March 30, 2016
04:33 PM GMT+8
KUALA LUMPUR, March 30 — The Bar Council has called on lawyers to gather at the federal police headquarters in Bukit Aman tomorrow when four lawyers will be questioned under the Sedition Act 1948 over a Malaysian Bar motion urging the Attorney-General to resign.
Malaysian Bar president Steven Thiru said in a circular to members of
the peninsula legal body today that it was unacceptable for the police
to record statements from Malaysian Bar secretary Karen Cheah, as well
as the three lawyers — Charles Hector Fernandez, Francis Pereira and R.
Shanmugam — who had moved the motion that was later adopted at the
Malaysian Bar’s annual general meeting (AGM) on March 19 with over 700
votes.
“Members of the Bar are invited to be present at the Bar Council
Secretariat and at the PDRM Headquarters in Bukit Aman, to show support
for our four abovementioned Members,” Steven said in the circular
sighted by Malay Mail Online, using the Malay initials for the Royal Malaysian Police.
“The action taken by PDRM is unacceptable. It is an interference with
the Bar Council’s statutory obligation to convene and conduct the AGM,
and the statutory entitlement of Members of the Malaysian Bar to move
motions for the consideration of the Malaysian Bar, consistent with the
Malaysian Bar’s objects and powers under the Legal Profession Act 1976,”
he added.
The Malaysian Bar has long opposed the Sedition Act, with hundreds of
lawyers staging a march in 2014 to call for the repeal of the colonial
era law that they say violates freedom of speech and expression.
The contentious motion at the Malaysian Bar’s recent AGM had urged Tan
Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali to resign as Attorney-General over his handling
of the cases involving state investment firm 1Malaysia Development Bhd
(1MDB), former 1MDB unit SRC International, and the transfer of RM2.6
billion into the prime minister’s personal accounts.
Apandi told a press conference on January 26 that he found that Prime
Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak did not commit any criminal offence in
the cases of SRC International and the RM2.6 billion transfer, which he
said was a donation from the Saudi royalty.- Malay Mail, 30/3/2016
No comments:
Post a Comment