See earlier post:- More power to Najib if National Security Council Bill 2015 passed?
Well, we knew of this Bill when we read the Malay Mail on 2/12/2015. The Bill wqas apparently tabled on 1/12/2015 - must have been late since I did not see any other news portal pick up the story. Now, I see that there was also a Bernama report dated 1/12/2015
PRESS RELEASE
The National Security Council Bill 2015 is a Lurch
Towards an Authoritarian Government
The
Malaysian Bar is alarmed by the proposed National Security Council Bill
2015 (“the Bill”) that was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat on 1 December
2015 by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Dato’ Seri Shahidan
Kassim, and which is reportedly scheduled for its second reading today.
The basis for this new law is unclear, and the manner in which it is
being rushed through the Dewan Rakyat is inexcusable.
The
Bill is an insidious piece of legislation that confers and concentrates
vast executive powers in a newly created statutory body called the
National Security Council (“NSC”).
The
NSC consists of key members of the executive, namely the Prime Minister
as Chairman and the Deputy Prime Minister as Deputy Chairman, as well
as the Minister of Defence, Minister of Home Affairs, Minister of
Communication and Multimedia, Chief Secretary to the Government, Chief
of Defence Forces, and the Inspector General of Police (see Clause 6).
It is noteworthy that the members of the NSC are all appointed by the
Prime Minister and report directly to him. Accordingly, the NSC is not
an independent body, and would essentially function at the dictates of
the Prime Minister.
The
NSC is to be “the Government’s central authority for considering
matters concerning national security” (see Clause 3). The NSC’s scope
of authority is broad and unchecked, as “national security” is not
defined in the Bill. This provision is therefore open to abuse by the
NSC, as the NSC would be able to treat almost any matter as one of
national security for the purposes of the Bill.
The
NSC will have the power to “control” and “issue directives” to “any
ministry, department, office, agency, authority, commission, committee,
board or council of the Federal Government, or of any of the State
Governments, established under any written law or otherwise” on
operations or matters concerning national security (see Clauses 2 and
5). Thus, a whole host of instrumentalities of the Federal Government
or State Governments — which could include Bank Negara Malaysia,
Securities Commission and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission —
would be made subservient to the NSC. The independence of these entities
would be restrained and compromised. The authority of State
Governments can be overridden.
Critically, the NSC is empowered to advise the Prime Minister to declare any area
in Malaysia as a “security area” if the NSC is of the view that the
security in that area is “seriously disturbed or threatened by any
person, matter or thing which causes or is likely to cause serious harm
to the people, or serious harm to the territories, economy, national key
infrastructure of Malaysia or any other interest in Malaysia, and
requires immediate national response” (see Clause 18(1)). The provision
gives the NSC (and in effect the Prime Minister) extremely broad
discretion to declare an area as a security area given the variety of
circumstances, which may not be genuine national security concerns at
all, such as peaceful public rallies or protests.
Upon
the NSC’s advice, the Prime Minister may, “if he considers it to be
necessary in the interest of national security, declare in writing the
area as a security area” (see Clause 18(1)). The declaration is for an
initial six months and “may be renewed by the Prime Minister from time
to time for such period, not exceeding six months at a time” (see
Clauses 18(3) and 18(4)). The unbridled power in the hands of the Prime
Minister allows him to declare almost any part of Malaysia as a
security area. Further, the Prime Minister may extend the period of such
declaration for an unlimited number of times and therefore, for an
indeterminate duration that could extend for years. The immortal words
of the late Raja Azlan Shah (acting Chief Justice of Malaya, as he then
was) in the case of Pengarah Tanah dan Galian, Wilayah Persekutuan v Sri Lempah Enterprise Sdn Bhd [1979]
1 MLJ 135, must be borne in mind and never forgotten: “Unfettered
discretion is a contradiction in terms … Every legal power must have
legal limits, otherwise there is dictatorship…”
Upon
a declaration that an area is a “security area”, the NSC would have
wide-ranging executive powers. It may issue executive orders that would
include the deployment of security forces (such as the police and the
armed forces) in the security area (see Clause 19(2)), and may appoint a
Director of Operations answerable only to the NSC (see Clause 20). The
Bill does not provide for the qualifications of the Director of
Operations, who has enormous and unrestricted powers, such as the power
to remove any person from the security area, impose curfew, and control
movement of persons or vehicles (see Clauses 22(2), 23 and 24).
As
regards the deployed security forces, they “may, without warrant,
arrest any person found committing, alleged to have committed or
reasonably suspected of having committed any offence under any written
laws in the security area”. The security forces also have powers to
stop and search individuals; enter and search any premises; and take
possession of any land, building or movable property (such as cars) in a
security area (see Clauses 25 to 30).
Thus,
all constitutional guarantees and fundamental rights of citizens in
respect of arrest, search and seizure of property can be ignored or
suspended. This is a grave infringement of the Federal Constitution.
Further,
there is power to dispense with inquests in respect of members
of the security forces and persons killed within the security area, as
long as a Magistrate “is satisfied that the person has been killed in
the security area as a result of operations undertaken by the [s]ecurity
[f]orces for the purpose of enforcing any written laws” (see Clause
35). “Written laws” are not defined, and could well include laws in
respect of minor offences. Thus, this provision permits security forces
to use disproportionate force that could result in the loss of lives,
with impunity.
It
would appear therefore that the Bill enables the Prime Minister, either
unilaterally or through the NSC, to exercise authoritarian executive
powers. These powers are in effect emergency powers, but without the
need for a proclamation of an emergency under Article 150 of the Federal
Constitution. This usurps the powers vested in the Yang di-Pertuan
Agong in, and violates the provisions of, Article 150 of the Federal
Constitution, and is a blatant appropriation of those powers. The Bill
is therefore of questionable constitutional validity. Moreover, the
extensive powers under the Bill effectively resurrects the powers
granted to the Government under the Emergency Ordinances, which were
repealed by Parliament in 2011.
The
Government will no doubt argue that we live in dangerous times, with
the constant threat of terrorism, and that such new powers are necessary
to combat such theats. However, we would remind the Government that it
has more than enough laws giving it more than enough draconian powers
to address security concerns. The proposed legislation extends those
draconian powers even further, allowing the Government to restrict
movement, abandon civil liberties, and administer areas centrally and
directly, bypassing state and local government. It avoids public
scrutiny and proper accountability, and promotes unfettered discretion
and an environment of impunity.
The
Malaysian Bar urges the Government to immediately withdraw the National
Security Council Bill 2015, and to step back from the abyss of
authoritarian rule by respecting the rule of law and our Federal
Constitution.
Steven Thiru
President
Malaysian Bar
3 December 2015
Parliament: National Security Council Bill 2015 tabled in Dewan Rakyat
01 December 2015 | Source: Bernama
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 1
(Bernama) -- The National Security Council (MKN) Bill 2015 which was
tabled in the Dewan Rakyat Tuesday provides 15 special powers to the
Operations Director and the security forces to control and coordinate
national security operations.
The bill, tabled by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim for first reading, among others, cites that the appointed Operations Director is responsible for operations in a security area.
The security forces comprise the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM); PDRM Volunteer Reserve and Auxiliary Police; Malaysian Armed Forces and Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency.
The bill provides for special jurisdiction of powers encompassing arrest upon entry (into a security area) and transfer of people; curfews; the power to control movements on roads; authority to catch; the power to inspect and seize; the power to search premises for hazardous substances; power to screen persons for dangerous items and the power to seize a vehicle, vessel, aircraft or transporter.
Also the Operations Director and security forces can take temporary possession of land, buildings or movable property; demand for resources; compensation.
The power to order the destruction of certain unoccupied buildings; the use of reasonable and necessary force; power to set aside an inquest and the surrender of the person arrested and items seized to the police.
In the special powers for curfew, the Operations Director can order everybody in a security area or any part of a security area to remain in their homes or buildings in the time stipulated in the order issued by the Operations Director.
Anybody who flouts the order commits an offence and would, upon conviction, be fined not exceeding RM5,000 or jailed not more than three years or both.
The bill also provides that members of the security forces can arrest anyone suspected of committing an offence under any written law in the security area, without a warrant.
The bill also spells out membership of MKN which comprises the Prime Minister as chairman, Deputy Prime Minister as deputy chairman followed by three ministers entrusted with defence, internal affairs and communication and multimedia.
The other members of MKN are the Chief Secretary to the Goverment, Malaysian Armed Forces chief and the Inspector-General of Police.
The prime minister on the recommendation of the Chief Secretary to the Government will appoint one person from among civil servants to become Director- General of the National Security and another as Deputy Director-General and any number of other officers from among public officials.
It also proposes giving the Prime Minister powers to declare certain areas in the country as security areas.
Also provided for is that any directive, order or decision made by the existing MKN would be in force immediately in line with the act.
Meanwhile, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nancy Shukri also tabled the Legal Profession (Amendment) Bill 2015 for first reading. - WEBSITE http://www.malaysianlaw.my/general/news/parliament-national-security-council-bill-2015-tabled-in-dewan-rakyat-MY14410.html
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment