Showing posts with label Malaysian Migrants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Malaysian Migrants. Show all posts

Friday, June 11, 2010

STOP PENALIZING WORKERS WHO WANT TO GET JUSTICE - MAXTER GLOVE SHOULD REINSTATE BURMESE MIGRANT WORKER WHO COMPLAINED TO LABOUR DEPARTMENT

Media Statement – 11/6/2010
STOP PENALIZING WORKERS WHO WANT TO GET JUSTICE
- MAXTER GLOVE SHOULD REINSTATE BURMESE MIGRANT
WORKER WHO COMPLAINED TO LABOUR DEPARTMENT

We, the undersigned 66 organizations, groups and networks, concerned about migrant and worker rights, are appalled at the treatment of workers at Maxter Glove Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (229862-H), at its factory at Lot 6070, Jalan Haji Abdul Manan, 6th Miles off Jalan Meru, Klang, Selangor, Malaysia.

We are appalled at the dismissal of Thu Maung, a Burmese migrant worker, who courageously lodged a complaint at the Labour Department to claim his rights as a worker. Claiming worker rights by lodging complaints against errant employers at the Labour Department is the proper and legally recognized procedure in Malaysia. It is very wrong for employers to discriminate against and/or terminate workers who are exercising their legal rights. It is also wrong for employers to discourage and/or threaten workers from seeking justice, when worker rights are being violated.

Maxter Glove Manufacturing Sdn Bhd is a subsidiary of Supermax Corporation Berhad. Maxter Glove Manufacturing Sdn Bhd is a gloves manufacturer that makes Latex Powdered Examination gloves, Clorinated & Polymer Coated Latex Powder Free gloves, Nitrile Gloves and Sterile surgical gloves which is also exported overseas. Supermax Corporation Berhad is an established company, that according to their 2009 Annual Report made an after-tax profit of about RM126 million.

On 23rd March 2010, Thu Maung and another Burmese migrant worker from Maxter Glove Manufacturing Sdn Bhd lodged a complaint at the Subang Jaya Labour Department. Their complaints, amongst others, was that the employer:-
a. had wrongfully deducted levy, that employers have to pay when they employ migrant workers, from the worker’s wages,
b. had unlawfully deducted the medical check-up fees of RM1000 from the worker’s wages,
c. had wrongfully withheld 2 months wages,
d. had failed to provide the migrant worker with accommodation,
e. had not been giving the workers one rest day per week,
f. had made the workers work overtime(sometimes up to 13 hours per day), and also on public holidays and rest days, and had thereafter failed to pay overtime wages and wages for working on rest days and/or public holidays at the statutorily stipulated rates.

On 23rd March, Thu Maung and another had also lodged a complaint at the Malaysian Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM).

On 12 April 2010, Thu Maung went again to the Labour Department in Rawang and gave a detailed complaint, whereby the Rawang Labour Department did record the complaint and forward the same to the Labour Department office in Port Klang, because they said that the Port Klang Labour Office, has the requisite jurisdiction since the employer, Maxter Glove Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, is in Klang.
According to Thu Maung, after about 1 month since the lodging of the complaint at the Subang Jaya Labour office, company’s representatives started intimidating workers individually by asking them who had complained to the Labour Department, and whether they were also going to complain to the Labour Department. This form of intimidation of workers is deplorable. This kind of actions by employers has the tendency of instilling fear and preventing workers from claiming their legally recognized labour rights.

On 28 April 2010, Thu Maung’s supervisor at the company, for no reason, suddenly asked him to return the worker’s pass and not to come back to work. Thu Maung was wrongfully terminated, and he verily believes that this was done just because he had complained to the Labour Department, and was perceived as the leader of the workers who wanted to claim their rights.

It is even worse when the worker is a migrant worker, for a termination will usually mean a cancellation of the work visa, and deportation back to their home country. This also would mean that they would not be able to even pursue their claims at the Labour Department, Labour Courts, Industrial Relations Department, Industrial Courts and/or Civil Courts as the physical presence of the complainant and/or litigant is necessary for the continuation of process of claiming rights.

The practice of terminating, cancellation of work visa and immediate deportation is a blatant disregard of the laws in Malaysia that exist to protect worker rights.

Work passes in Malaysia allow workers to work only for a specific employer – and hence a termination would leave the worker with no ability to work and earn a living legally in Malaysia, while he awaits the determination of the process that may give the worker justice. Cancellation of the work pass also makes his stay in Malaysia illegal, and he risk being arrested, detained and deported.

It is sad that the current laws and practices of Malaysia, which used to employ more than 2 million migrant workers have not been amended yet to ensure that workers who claim their rights are not wrongfully terminated and sent back.

Whilst there is a clear provision in the Industrial Relations Act 1967, that is section 5, which explicitly prohibits employers (or persons acting on behalf of employers) from discriminating, threatening, dismissing or acting negatively against workers who are interested in forming, joining, and/or encouraging other workers to join trade unions, there is no similar clear provision in law protecting workers who want to claim their worker rights through the Labour Departments and other available avenues. As an example, section 5(1)(c) and (d) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967is as follows:-
(1) No employer or trade union of employers, and no person action on behalf of an employer or such trade union shall -

…. (c) discriminate against any person in regard to employment, promotion, any condition of employment or working conditions on the ground that he is or is not a member or officer of a trade union;


(d) dismiss or threaten to dismiss a workman, injure or threaten to injure him in his employment or alter or threaten to alter his position to his prejudice by reason that the workman -
         (i) is or proposes to become, or seeks to persuade any other person to become,
a member or officer of a trade union; or
        (ii) participates in the promotion, formation or activities of a trade union; or…

There should be a similar clear provision in law that will prevent employers from harassing, threatening, discriminating and/or dismissing workers that claim their worker rights using existing avenues of complaints and remedies. The act of employers impeding, dismissing (or threathening to dismiss) workers who claim their worker rights should also be made an offence with a hefty fine. Workers should also receive a significant sum in exemplary damages, over and above their claim. Deterrence is needed to stop this unhealthy practice of employers violating worker rights, and preventing them access to justice.

In the case of Thu Maung, we call for the immediate reinstatement of Thu Maung without any loss of benefits.

We call on Dato' Seri Stanley Thai, Executive Chairman cum Group Managing Director of Supermax Corporation Berhad, to ensure that the wrong done by their subsidiary, Maxter Glove Manufacturing Sdn Bhd, to Thu Maung and other workers in the said company is ended, and that all workers are paid forthwith what has been wrongly deducted from their wages, monies that have wrongly been withheld returned, outstanding overtime payments, and that all legitimate claims are settled.

We call on the government of Malaysia to do the needful, including enacting laws that will deter employers in Malaysia from exploiting workers, and also protect workers that claim their worker rights from the negative acts of repercussion and/or ‘revenge’ by some bad employers.

We also call on the government of Malaysia to ensure that all migrant workers can continue to stay and work legally in Malaysia until their cases in the Labour Department, Labour Courts, Industrial Relations Department, Industrial Courts and/or Civil Courts, and appeals thereafter are completed.

Charles Hector
Pranom Somwong

For and on behalf of the following 66 organizations

ALIRAN, Malaysia
Alliance of Health Workers Philippines
Arakan League for Democracy (ALD-LA-MALAYSIA)
Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD)
Asian Migrant Centre (AMC)
Asian Migrants Coordinating Body-Hong Kong (AMCB)
Association of Indonesian Migrant Workers in HK (ATKI-HK)
BAYAN USA.
BOMSA, Dhaka, Bangladesh
BUGKOS
Burma Campaign, Malaysia
Burma Partnership
Canada-Philippines Solidarity for Human Rights (Vancouver, BC Canada)
Center for Japanese-Filipino Families
Clean Clothes Campaign -International Secretariat
Committee for Asian Women (CAW)
Communication Union of Australia (Vic Branch)
Empower, Chiang Mai
Filipino Migrant Center
Frank-Hubner-Scholl Resistance Movement of the White Rose
Free Burma Campaign Singapore (FBCSG)
Friends of Burma, Malaysia
Gabriela-Taiwan
IMA Research Foundation, Bangladesh
Institute for National and Democratic Studies of Indonesia (INDIES)
Interfaith Cooperation Forum
KAFIN-Migrante (Saitama)
Kafin Migrant Center, Japan
Labour Behind the Label, United Kingdom
MADPET - Malaysians against Death Penalty and Torture
Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC)
May 1st Coalition for Worker & Immigrant Rights, USA
Mekong Migration Network (MMN)
Migrante Aotearoa New Zealand
Migrante B.C. (Canada)
Migrante Denmark
Migrante Europe
Migrante International
Migrante-Middle East
Migrante Nagoya
Migrante Taiwan
Migrante UK.
Migranteng Ilonggo sa Taiwan
National League for Democracy [NLD (LA)], Malaysia
National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (NNIRR), U.S.
Network of Action for Migrants in Malaysia (NAMM)
PAN Asia and the Pacific
Parti Rakyat Malaysia (PRM)
Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER)
Persatuan Masyarakat Malaysia & Wilayah Persekutuan (PERMAS)
Philippines Australia Union
Philippine Society in Japan
PINAY (Filipino Women's Organization in Quebec)
Pusat Komas
Rights Jessore, India
Shan Refugee Organization, Malaysia
Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), Malaysia
The Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants (APMM)
The Best Friend Library - Chiang Mai, Thailand
The Hong Kong Coalition for Free Burma Campaign
Think Centre Singapore
United Indonesians against Overcharging (PILAR)
United Filipinos in Hong Kong
Workers Hub for Change (WH4C)
YASANTI, Indonesia
ZOMI National Congress- Malaysia

Tuesday, June 08, 2010

World Cup Soccer Balls: EXPLOITATION STILL THE NORM - Take action

As we prepare to enjoy the 2010 World Cup - let us also be aware of violation of rights of workers that stitch the soccer balls. Read the press statement below, download the full report and read, and thereafter take action. Click on the link [Take action now  >>]
 
Make your voice be heard today to put pressure on FIFA. New research reveals that workers stitching soccer balls in Pakistan, India, China and Thailand continue to experience alarming labour rights violations.

Take action now  >>

Problems highlighted in the report are:[Download the report here >>]
  • child labour still exists in the Pakistani industry especially within home-based work.
  • gender discrimination of female home-based workers, being paid the least and facing the constant thread of losing their jobs due to pregnancy;
  • overtime working hours as in one Chinese factory, where workers were found to work up to 21 hours a day every day for an entire month;
  • the lack of proper drinking water or medical care facilities, and even toilets, as found in Indian stitching centres.
About 75% of the over 200 workers interviewed in Pakistan were not permanent workers and therefore didn’t have access to benefits and social security.

Over the past decade, regular reports of violations of human rights in soccer ball production have been presented to key players in the industry including global brands and FIFA.

The CCC is shocked that after all of these years, low wages and other labour rights violations are still the norm and not the exception in the industry. Please remind FIFA that they are responsible for their sport, and that as fans worldwide get excited about the games, the public expects the soccer ball industry to finally live up to its promises.

Send a letter to FIFA now!
Thanks for your support.
-------------------------
Take action now at:
http://www.cleanclothes.org/campaigns/soccer-ball-stitchers-need-your-support#action


Press release: World Cup Soccer Balls: EXPLOITATION STILL THE NORM
Monday, 07 June 2010 00:00
Report reveals Child Labour, Poverty Wages, Temporary Workers

As the frenzy grows over the upcoming FIFA World Cup in South Africa, there is a part of the World Cup that won’t be broadcast on TV.  The Play Fair Alliance today asked FIFA to respond to the report “Missed the Goal for Workers: the Reality of Soccer Ball Stitchers”, released by US-based NGO International Labor Rights Forum (ILRF) on 7 June. The report reveals that workers stitching soccer balls in Pakistan, India, China and Thailand continue to experience alarming labour rights violations. The research found that child labour still exists in the Pakistani industry and is also occurring in India and China.

In the 13 years since the soccer ball industry signed the “Atlanta Agreement” committing to clean up the industry, regular reports of violations of human rights in soccer ball production have been brought to the attention of key actors in the industry including global brands and FIFA. Most recently, in 2008, the Play Fair Alliance, which consists of the Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC), the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Federation (ITGLWF),  published research on China, India and Thailand, where workers reported wages below the legal minimum despite working 12-13 hours a day. Home-based workers in India reported piece rates as low as US$0.35 per ball, completing two to four balls a day.

It is shocking that after all of these years, low wages and other labour rights violations are still the norm and not the exception in the industry,” commented Ineke Zeldenrust from the Clean Clothes Campaign.  “As fans worldwide get excited about the games, the public expects FIFA and the soccer ball industry to finally live up to its promises.

The ITUC has invited FIFA today to discuss concrete measures that can be taken to clean up the industry.  It is a scandal that so many workers are subjected to appalling exploitation in an industry that generates so much wealth, and we are looking to FIFA to take the lead in ensuring a fair deal for these workers,” said ITUC General Secretary Guy Ryder.

Other problems highlighted in the report are gender discrimination against female home-based workers, who are paid the least and face constant threat of losing their jobs due to pregnancy; overlong working hours as in one Chinese factory, where workers were found to work as many as 21 hours a day without a day off for an entire month; and lack of proper drinking water or medical care facilities, and even toilets, as found in Indian stitching centers.

These conditions are absolutely unacceptable” said Patrick Itschert, general secretary of the ITGLWF.  “FIFA must take concrete steps to ensure that the human rights of all those engaged in producing soccer balls are respected.

The Play Fair Alliance calls on FIFA and the soccer ball industry to take immediate action to address the issues of extremely low wages, proliferation of temporary workers, and a lack of civil society engagement in working to improve conditions for the very workers that produce the ball at the center of the World Cup 2010 games.

The Global Union for Construction Workers, the BWI, has also been in dialogue with FIFA, to enlist its support for better rights and conditions for workers building and renovating venues used international tournaments.

We have had to issue FIFA a yellow card on this, since workers building the stadiums where these tournaments are held are not getting a fair deal either,” said BWI General Secretary Ambet Yuson.

The report is available at:
http://cleanclothes.org/documents/ILRF_soccerball_report.pdf

Kristin Blom, International Trade Union Confederation, + 487 38 44 91
Ineke Zeldenrust, Clean Clothes Campaign/Play Fair Alliance +31-6-51280210
Trina Tocco, International Labor Rights Forum (USA), + 1 269 873 1000
-------------------------
Notes to the editor:

In April 2008, Play Fair 2008 issued the report, “Clearing the Hurdles: Steps to improving working conditions in the global sportswear industry”, revealing that violations of worker rights is still the sportswear industry norm and outlining steps to improve working conditions. Report at www.playfair2008.org/docs/Clearing_the_Hurdles.pdf

Read the Play Fair Alliance letter to FIFA

The Play Fair Alliance 2008 consists of the Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC), the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), and the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers Federation (ITGLWF). Play Fair organisations have been campaigning since 2003 to commit Olympic organisations and the sportswear industry to take responsibility for ensuring workers’ rights in their supply chains. More at http://playfair2008.org

A public appeal asking FIFA to clean up the soccer ball industry was released by CCC and can be accessed at: [coming soon]

More on the BWI campaign at: http://www.bwint.org/default.asp?Language=EN

International Labor Rights Forum is an advocacy organisation dedicated to achieving just and humane treatment for workers worldwide. ILRF works to stop child labour, promote and protect the rights of working women, end sweatshop labour, and to end violence against trade unions. ILRF has worked on labour-rights issues and specifically the prevalence of child labour in the soccer ball industry since 1996.  More at www.laborrights.org.

Missed the Goal for Workers: the Reality of Soccer Ball Stitchers in Pakistan, India, China and Thailand
Monday, 07 June 2010 15:52
June 7, 2010, by International Labor Rights Forum

This report presents the key findings of the International Labor Rights Forum’s research in the four largest soccer balls producing countries: Pakistan, India, China and Thailand. This report also highlights the current missteps of typical corporate social responsibility initiatives such as fair trade certification and factory monitoring where wages and temporary work must be transformed in order for labour rights to be realized by the many soccer ball production workers.

The report find that labour abusive practice across the soccer ball industry in Pakistan, India, China and Thailand includes the predominant use of precarious labour in the hand-stitched soccer ball industry, wage violation, health and safety violation, and lack of respect for freedom of association and the right to bargain collectively.

Finally, the problems identified and analysed in this report were not new. ILRF thinks that the way in which the soccer ball industry is constructed, the unequal relationship between buyers and suppliers, and other factors have often negated even the best efforts to fix the endemic problems that continue to plague this industry. Also, ILRF firmly believes that further research and dialogue among various stakeholders is absolutely crucial in order to have a real impact on the labour rights violation across the soccer ball industry.
Download the report here >>

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Incomplete facts paint the wrong picture - Did Home Minister intend to propagate wrong perception about foreigners..migrants?

Malaysian government is complaining that there are so many foreigners in Malaysia's prisons - and that they have spend so much money on them...but what really is the intention of the Home Minister and the Malaysian Government. Is it to propagate and/or enhance the prejudicial perception that Migrants/Foreigners are bad...'criminals'...the reason for crimes,...What is it you are trying to do? Why no mention about the number of Malaysians in prison, and the cost incurred? How many tried and convicted persons in Malaysian prisons are Malaysians...and how many are foreigners? How many of these foreigners have been tried and convicted for crimes other than offences against the immigration act (lapse visa, no passport, etc...)? 

Hishammuddin [Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein] said that in 2009, there were 81,396 foreigners in Malaysian prisons and a staggering RM171.08mil was spent on them, adding that between 2006 and last year, 408,979 illegal immigrants were detained at 13 immigration depots.

Last year alone, the Government spent RM341,881 daily to feed them. - Star, 24/3/2010, One month for foreign labour experts

Question that must be asked is:-
Who are these persons who are in prison, and why are they in prison?

How many are convicted persons? (i.e. those that have been tried and found guilty by the court, OR those who have pleaded guilty in court - and are in prison because they are serving out the court sentences of imprisonment.)

Then, with regard to those convicted and sentenced, what are their offences? (i.e. how many for murder, robbery, theft, etc....and how many for some immigration offence like overstaying, visa violations, not having documents, etc...)

How many are really REMAND PRISONERS? These are persons being detained whilst they wait for the trials to start...or be over. These are innocent persons because we believe in the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. 

Many of the poor, and also migrant workers and other foreigners sometime cannot afford to pay the bail - which can be high sometimes - RM2,000, RM3,000, RM10,000, RM50,000... it all depends on the Magistrate and/or judges - and when it come to non-Malaysians, it is sometimes even higher. Foreigners and migrants also have the difficulty getting sureties, and courts normally insist that they be Malaysians. Would you be willing to put your money in court and stand as surety for a foreigner - knowing that if he runs away or not turn up in court the next day, you will lose all (or most) of your money. Surety guarantees the attendance of the accused at the next and subsequent court dates. It is very hard for many foreigners to get sureties...

Next problem that faces the foreigners is that their entry and stay in Malaysia is governed by visas. A social visit visa may be for 90 days(or less), and  many of these visas expire (or are going to expire) by the time the foreigners is brought to court and charged, and this makes it more 'difficult' for courts to grant bail. 

I say 'more difficult' because in Malaysia, all persons are entitled to be treated equally, and a person charged with a bailable offence is entitled to be bailed out. [Only limited offences like murder, drug trafficking, etc ... do not allow for bail - but even here, in certain cases bail would be granted].

What happens if the social visit visa, work visa, etc has expired (or is about to expire)? Well, in granting bail, the court can direct the Immigration Department to issue the foreigner with a 'Special Pass' - that will allow him/her to remain legally in Malaysia. Normally, when it comes to a foreigner, the courts as a condition of granting bail, will also require the passport to be deposited in court as security. Hence, even taking the passport to the Immigration to get a Special Pass is tricky. Court may require a personal undertaking from the lawyer to take the passport from court to the Immigration Department, to get the 'Special Pass' and thereafter return the Passport back to Court. Most lawyers may not be willing to do so. 

There is another problem - as the Immigration Special Pass (costing RM100) is a 1-month pass usually, and the process have to be repeated every month. Delay in trials starting and ending in Malaysia makes it an extremely time and cost consuming exercise - and maybe only the rich foreigner an afford  this.
Another problem is that Passport can expire - and how does one renew it. Possible if renewal can be done in some embassies. 

What happens when passports are not in the possession with the detained 'suspect' - as in Malaysia, against the law, employers and 3rd parties hold on to migrant's passports. (and Malaysian government seems OK with this...) .. passports get 'lost' when someone gets arrested, and employers/agents so easily deny that they had(or have) the foreigner's passports. Should special passes be given to the accussed foreigner? If it is a bailable offence, I say it must.

The problem why there are co many foreigners in Malaysia's prisons is because of  Malaysia's UMNO-led BN  government's failures, and the Home Minister should not be complaining about this...I believe that most of them are remand prisoners, and if they had been 'richer' Malaysians, they would have been out on bail - and hence saving the government money needed to keep them in prison.

QUESTIONS FOR THE HOME MINISTER & Malaysian Goverment (which maybe some MP could also ask - or the government could just give us all the answer?)

* How many foreigners in Malaysian prisons are 'convicted and sentenced' prisoners? How many are remand prisoners? How many of the remand prisoners are charged with offences that are bailable (that they could be released on bail)? For the foreigners, how many of them are in a situation where their visas are expired? How many have passports that have expired? How many do not have a copy of their own passports?

** How many Malaysians in Malaysian prisons are 'convicted and sentenced' prisoners? How many are remand prisoners? How many of the remand prisoners are charged with offences that are bailable (that they could be released on bail)? 

*** For the foreigners who have been sentenced, and serving prison sentences, how many are with regard to immigration law offences?

***What is the per day per prisoner cost? Malaysia's Home Minister said that RM171.08mil was spent on 81,396 foreigners in Malaysian prisons in 2006-2009(3 years), how many actual prison days are we talking about, and what percentage of this sentenced prison time, and what percentage was really remand prison time? How much was spent on Malaysian prisoners for the same period?

The giving of information without full details and particulars leads to people making wrong conclusions, i.e. that migrants are 'bad people' and commit crimes...that most of the crimes in Malaysia are committed by foreigners, etc.. This is called tarnishing the image of foreigners - and it is wrong, and one reason for doing this is to continue to propagate this prejudice against the poor foreign migrant workers....

In the past, there was a perception that Malays were lazy and stupid, and there was nothing 'straight' about a Chinese except his hair - i.e. they are untrustworthy. The propagation of such prejudice based on ethnicity (religion, citizenship, ..) is so wrong. Is the Malaysian Home Minister trying to propagate a negative image of migrants in Malaysia...of foreigners in Malaysia? I wonder....

Hishammuddin [Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein] said that in 2009, there were 81,396 foreigners in Malaysian prisons and a staggering RM171.08mil was spent on them, adding that between 2006 and last year, 408,979 illegal immigrants were detained at 13 immigration depots.

Last year alone, the Government spent RM341,881 daily to feed them. - Star, 24/3/2010, One month for foreign labour experts


See also earlier posts:-

This proposal to register them as workers is also economically feasible, as Malaysia now spends about RM30-00 per migrant per day in the detention centres.

Deputy Home Minister Datuk Wira Abu Seman Yusop said the government also had to shoulder expenditure of RM30 a day for every illegal immigrant held at immigration depots.

"This covers the daily cost and treatment cost only, and not medical cost. The cost of air, sea and land charges is borne by the government," he said when replying to a question from Mohsin Fadzli Samsuri (PKR-Bagan Serai). Star, 10/12/2009, Parliament: RM30mil spent to send back 154,729 illegals [Earlier post:- Registering undocumented migrants and allowing them to work will profit Malaysia]
The Home Minister 'smartly' reveals not the number of arrests made - but the number of detentions made. He is reported to have said, "...47,310 detentions were made..." in 2009.
"This involved 26,545 cases of illegal entry; 8,655 cases of overstaying after the visit pass or permit had lapsed; 6,836 cases of flouting pass or permit conditions or having fake permits; and the rest were for other offences," he said.


Then, he gives a breakdown for the reasons of detentions...
26,545 cases of illegal entry
8,655 cases of overstaying after the visit pass or permit had lapsed 
6,836 cases of flouting pass or permit conditions or having fake permits
That brings the total to 42,036 persons - and what are the possible other offences that caused the other  5,274 to be detained. 

Were they detained because they could not produce their original passport and pass/permits because the employer wrongly was holding on to them? I believe that this could have been the reason for the arrest and detention. -How many migrant workers were wrongly arrested? detained? Be truthful..reveal all Mr Home Minister
When they talk about cost, I also wonder whether this cost is caused by other reasons like corruption, giving out over-priced tenders to certain parties, ... Looking at the Al-Jazeera video on the condition of detention centers, especially the food that they get, one wonders whether so much money is spent on detainees/prisoners. 

Maybe, Malaysia should be looking at how money can be saved by cutting down unnecessary expenses. Would it not be cheaper if food is prepared with the help of the detainees/prisoners? Would it not be cheaper if laundry is done by prisoners/detainees? Maybe, instead of detaining them in prisons, while they await their trial, they should be released on Bail with proper papers to stay/work in this country. Maybe, the government will increase the number of courts & judges, and expedite all cases involving foreigners (and all other remand prisoners) - maybe it should commence  within 2 weeks, and should be completed not later than 3 months from the date of being charged? 

A lot of money get wasted because of the policies, priorities of the UMNO-led government of Malaysia. A few years ago, it was revealed that we have only 2.4 judges to a million people, and it was a far cry from what we needed. If you do not have enough court and judges, of course there will be a lot of 'prisoners' languishing in court waiting for their trial to start and finish - and sometimes,  even the 'innocent' may plead guilty so that he can just serve his sentence and get out of jail. A grave injustice brought about by the UMNO-led BN government's failings.

Special courts - what we need is more Judges...and more courts."...The Malaysian ratio is 2.4 judges to a million people — a far cry from the ratio in India (10.5 judges), Australia (57.1), Britain (50.1) and Canada (75)..." - 2.4 judges to a million people [See earlier posts:-Eradication of poverty, Free Universal Healthcare, Worker Safety - seem to be not priorities of PM Najib]



 



Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Malaysian ex-domestic worker, after serving sentence, given £4,500 by the Government to leave England.

Well, for one there are Malaysian domestic workers in other countries...

Second, when the domestic worker commits a crime, the law steps in and she is tried, convicted and sentenced...

But after release, should she be deported back to her home country if she was there as an asylum seeker or refugee? That is the question...

In this, this Malaysian woman has served out her sentence for her crime .... she was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment, and after 2 1/2 years she has been released. Yes, for good behaviour, etc prison sentences can be cut short - but will it be cut short by 50%... it can.

An immigrant convicted of the horrific killing of a 17-month-old baby has been given £4,500 by the Government as a 'bribe' to leave the country.

Malaysian Agnes Wong, 29, was jailed for five years in 2008 for the brutal manslaughter of a toddler she was supposed to be child-minding.

She was let out of prison in July this year, and two weeks ago was put on a plane at Heathrow and sent to with a 'voucher' worth £4,500 to spend when she got there.
Wong was jailed after a court heard how she had swung the boy, Hugo Wang, by his ankles and smashed his head. He died of brain injuries.

Wong's payment has sparked disbelief and outrage, coming just days after the Prime Minister said he understood the public's mounting concerns over immigration.

Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green said: 'Only last week, said he "gets it" on immigration but this is proof he doesn't get it. For an immigrant who killed a child to get taxpayers' money to help with her future life is nothing short of appalling.'
Mr Green demanded to know why Wong had not been automatically deported without a penny of public money.

'Even while Labour repeatedly boasted about introducing automatic deportation for people like this, it now appears they have been using public money to help people get round that very system,' he said.

The horrific story of Hugo's last hours caused national revulsion when Wong's  sadistic behaviour was exposed in court.



The unregistered childminder, who came to the UK in 2003, was paid £120 a week to look after Hugo in her home in Salford, Greater , while the boy's parents worked 16 to 20 hours a day to make ends meet.

She was accused of waging a 'regime of terror' against him, torturing him with a hairdryer and hitting him so hard with a ruler that it snapped.

Hugo died in January 2007, a day after he was taken, unconscious, to hospital where he underwent emergency surgery.

He had been struck with such force that his brain had shifted in his skull and caused internal bleeding. Doctors also found bite and burn marks on his body.

Wong, who denied murder, was found guilty of manslaughter but was sentenced in May 2008 to just five years in prison.

The Mail on Sunday has now learned that Wong served only the minimum jail term of two-and-half years, including her time in custody before and during the trial.
The Chinese restaurant where Hugo Wang's parents worked
Making ends meet: The Chinese restaurant where Hugo Wang's parents worked


Just two weeks ago, she was deported to Malaysia under a controversial 'Facilitated Returns Scheme' under which foreign prisoners are paid up to £5,000 if they agree to leave the UK as early as possible without fighting their deportation using human-rights laws or by claiming asylum.

So far, around 1,000 have left the UK and been given the money.

It is not known for certain whether Wong - who used the anglicised name Agnes, although her Malaysian name is Siew Teng - entered Britain legally or illegally. However, any immigrant who commits a serious crime can forfeit their right to remain in Britain and can be deported.

David Wood, the UK Border Agency's director of criminality and detention, defended the scheme, saying: 'We don't want foreign criminals in the UK. Every day that we can get these individuals out of the country early removes the risk they present to UK citizens and saves our taxpayers more than £100 a night in detention costs as well as administrative and court costs.'
As Wong boarded a plane at Heathrow on November 2 bound for Kuala Lumpur, immigration officials handed her a letter confirming that she was entitled to a 'reintegration fund' payout of up to £4,500.

The letter informed her that the money, provided by UK taxpayers but administered by an international migration organisation, could be 'invested' in training for a new job, housing, education, medical treatment or to help set up a small business.

The letter - seen by The Mail on Sunday - also advised Wong, who was kept in an immigration detention centre between her release from jail in July and her deportation earlier this month, how to claim the money.

Hugo's parents, who were immigrants from , both worked at the China City restaurant in Southport, where football star is a regular.
Letter offering Agnes Wong £4,500, under her Malaysian name
Final insult: The letter offering Agnes Wong £4,500, under her Malaysian name


Friends have now spoken of how Hugo's father, Jian Lin Situ, never got over the death of his son and how he had taken the baby's ashes back to China.

They also voiced their anger that the boy's killer would get thousands of pounds of public money to build a new life. One said: 'It is an absolute disgrace that she has got this money. That sort of money will go a long way in Malaysia.'

The friend recalled how Hugo's father had been distraught to learn that some of his son's body parts were initially retained by the coroner in case Wong appealed against her conviction.

'When Hugo died it was big in all the newspapers in China. We followed the proceedings and were all horrified by what happened to that poor boy,' said the friend.

'Jian and Hugo's mother Zhen split up soon after. I think they both blamed each other for their son's death.

'I think Zhen went back to China. Jian never got over Hugo's death. He was absolutely devastated. He took Hugo's ashes back to China, to the Canton district, the family's ancestral home. After that, Jian moved on to a restaurant in Liverpool. From there he went to another restaurant in Blackburn and we lost touch.'

The friend added that Mr Situ would be 'horrified' to learn that Wong had already been returned home, especially as he protested that she should originally have been given a 15-year jail sentence.
'Jian thought five years was too lenient. This is just an insult to Hugo's memory. What are they playing at, letting her out so early? They should have thrown away the key.'

Sir , chairman of the Migrationwatch think-tank, said: 'It is absolutely wrong in principle that criminals who thoroughly deserve to be deported should be paid for going. This should not happen at all.'

A Home Office official confirmed there were two other voluntary schemes offering illegal immigrants incentives to return: one for individuals in the asylum system paying up to £4,000; and one for immigrants who have no right to be here but have not claimed asylum, paying out a maximum of £1,000. - Mail Online, 15/11/2009, Fury as immigrant baby killer is paid £4,500 'bribe' to quit Britain


In Malaysia, s.300 of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with the question of suspending and remitting sentence

300.  Power to suspend or remit sentence.
(1) When any person has been sentenced to punishment for an offence the Ruler of the State, acting in accordance with Article 42 of the Constitution, in which the offence was committed or in which the conviction was had may at any time, without conditions, or upon any conditions which the person sentenced accepts, suspend the execution of his sentence or remit the whole or any part of the punishment to which he has been sentenced.
(2) Whenever an application is made to a Ruler for the suspension or remission of a sentence the Ruler may require the convicting Judge or Magistrate to state his opinion as to whether the application should be granted or refused and the Judge or Magistrate shall state his opinion accordingly.
(3) If any condition on which a sentence has been suspended or remitted is, in the opinion of the Ruler by whom it was granted, not fulfilled, the Ruler may cancel the suspension or remission; whereupon the person in whose favour the sentence has been suspended or remitted may, if at large, be arrested by any police officer without warrant and remanded by a Magistrate to undergo the unexpired portion of the sentence.
(4) Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to interfere with the right of the Ruler of any State to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment.

Aricle 42 of the Federal Constitution is as follows:-

42.  Power of pardon, etc.
(1) The Yang di-Pertuan Agong has power to grant pardons, reprieves and respites in respect of all offences which have been tried by court-martial and all offences committed in the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya; and the Ruler or Yang di- Pertua Negeri of a State has power to grant pardons, reprieves and respites in respect of all other offences committed in his State.
[Am. Act A1095 - prior text read - The Yang di-Pertuan Agong has power to grant pardon, reprieves and respites in respect of all offences which have been tried by court-martial and all offences committed in the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Labuan; and the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri of a State has power to grant pardons, reprieves and respites in respect of all other offences committed in his State.]
(2) Subject to Clause (10), and without prejudice to any provision of federal law relating to remission of sentences for good conduct or special services, any power conferred by federal or State law to remit, suspend or commute sentences for any offence shall be exercisable by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong if the sentence was passed by a court-martial or by a civil court exercising jurisdiction in the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya and, in any other case, shall be exercisable by the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri of the State in which the offence was committed.
[Am. Act A1095 - prior text read - Subject to Clause (10), and without prejudice to any provision of federal law relating to remission of sentences for good conduct or special services, any power conferred by federal or State law to remit, suspend or commute sentences for any offence shall be exercisable by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong if the sentence was passed by a court-martial or by a civil court exercising juridiction in the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Labuan and, in any other case, shall be exercisable by the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri of the State in which the offence was committed.]
(3) Where an offence was committed wholly or partly outside the Federation or in more than one State or in circumstances which make it doubtful where it was committed, it shall be treated for the purposes of this Article as having been committed in the State in which it was tried. For the purpose of this Clause the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, the Federal Territory of Labuan and the Federal Territory of Putrajaya, shall each be regarded as a State.
[Am. Act A1095 - prior text read - Where an offence was committed wholly or partly outside the Federation or in more than one State or in circumstances which make it doubtful where it was committed, it shall be treated for the purposes of this Article as having been committed in the State in which it was tried. For the purpose of this Clause the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur or the Federal Territory of Labuan, as the case may be, shall each be regarded as a State.]
(4) The powers mentioned in this Article -
(a) are, so far as they are exercisable by the Yang di- Pertuan Agong, among functions with respect to which federal law may make provision under Clause (3) of Article 40;
(b) shall so far as they are exercisable by the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri of a State, be exercised on the advice of a Pardons Board constituted for that State in accordance with Clause (5).
(5) The Pardons Board constituted for each State shall consist of the Attorney General of the Federation, the Chief Minister of the State and not more than three other members, who shall be appointed by the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri; but the Attorney General may from time to time by instrument in writing delegate his functions as a member of the Board to any other person, and the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri may appoint any person to exercise temporarily the functions of any member of the Board appointed by him who is absent or unable to act.
(6) The members of a Pardons Board appointed by the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri shall be appointed for a term of three years and shall be eligible for reappointment, but may at any time resign from the Board.
(7) A member of the Legislative Assembly of a State or of the House of Representatives shall not be appointed by the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri to be a member of a Pardons Board or to exercise temporarily the functions of such a member.
(8) The Pardons Board shall meet in the presence of the Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri and he shall preside over it.
(9) Before tendering their advice on any matter a Pardons Board shall consider any written opinion which the Attorney General may have delivered thereon.
(10) Notwithstanding anything in this Article, the power to grant pardons, reprieves and respites in respect of, or to remit, suspend or commute sentences imposed by any court established under any law regulating Islamic religious affairs in the State of Malacca, Penang, Sabah or Sarawak or the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya shall be exercisable by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong as Head of the religion of Islam in the State.
[Am. Act A1095 - prior text read - Notwithstanding anything in this Article, the power to grant pardons, reprieves and respites in respect of, or to remit, suspend or commute sentences imposed by any court established under any law regulating Islamic religious affairs in the State of Malacca, Penang, Sabah or Sarawak or the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Labuan shall be exercisable by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong as Head of the religion of Islam in the State.]
(11) For the purpose of this Article, there shall be constituted a single Pardons Board for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya and the provisions of Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Pardons Board under this Clause except that reference to "Ruler or Yang di-Pertua Negeri" shall be construed as reference to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and reference to "Chief Minister of the State" shall be construed as reference to the Minister responsible for the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya.
[Am. Act A1095 - prior text read - For the purpose of this Article, there shall be constituted a single Pardons Board for the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur and the Federal Territory of Labuan and the provisions of Clauses (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Pardons Board under this Clause except that reference to "Ruler or Yang di- Pertua Negeri" shall be construed as reference to the Yang di- Pertuan Agong and reference to "Chief Minister of the State" shall be construed as reference to the Minister responsible for the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur and the Federal Territory of Labuan.]
(12) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Constitution, where the powers mentioned in this Article -
(a) are exercisable by the Yang di-Pertua Negeri of a State and are to be exercised in respect of himself or his wife, son or daughter, such powers shall be exercised by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong acting on the advice of the Pardons Board constituted for that State under this Article and which shall be presided over by him;
(b) are to be exercised in respect of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, the Ruler of a State, or his Consort, as the case may be, such powers shall be exercised by the Conference of Rulers and the following provisions shall apply:
(i) when attending any proceedings under this Clause, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall not be accompanied by the Prime Minister and the other Rulers shall not be accompanied by their Menteri-Menteri Besar;
(ii) before arriving at its decision on any matter under this Clause, the Conference of Rulers shall consider any written opinion which the Attorney General may have delivered thereon;
(c) are to be exercised by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or the Ruler of a State in respect of his son or daughter, as the case may be, such powers shall be exercised by the Ruler of a State nominated by the Conference of Rulers who shall act in accordance with the advice of the relevant Pardons Board constituted under this Article.
(13) For the purpose of paragraphs (b) and (c) of Clause (12), the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or the Ruler of the State concerned, as the case may be, and the Yang di-Pertua-Yang di-Pertua Negeri shall not be members of the Conference of Rulers.

Your comments would be appreciated on this rather interesting issue of migrants, crime, money for starting a new life provided they accepted to be deported, ...




Saturday, September 06, 2008

All Malaysians are migrants ultimately, Saudara Ahmad Ismail

Did Anwar Ibrahim, PKR, PAS and the Pakatan Rakyat come out strongly against what was allegedly said by that Bukit Bendera Umno chief Ahmad Ismail about Malaysian Chinese....It is very very important for the 'other than Malaysian of Chinese descendancy' to also come out very strongly on these issues.
Bukit Bendera Umno division chief Datuk Ahmad Ismail had called the Chinese pendatang (immigrants) at a ceramah prior to the Permatang Pauh by-election. - Star Online, 3/9/2008,Najib: Umno apologises
Reading out a 16-page statement, Ahmad recollected his by-election rally speech and did not deny it contained the statement that “Chinese were immigrants squatting in this country”. - Malaysiakini, 5/9/2008, Penang Umno backs Ahmad, snubs Pak Lah
We all know that our DPM, Mohd Najib Razak, did come out and apologize for and on behalf of UMNO
Umno deputy president Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has apologised for the statement made by one of the party's division leaders which resulted in a lot of criticism from the Chinese community.

“We will apologise. Umno apologises,” he told a press conference after launching the Chery Eastar multi-purpose vehicle at a hotel here yesterday.

“It (The comment) was totally unwarranted and doesn’t reflect the position and attitude of Umno or the leadership of Umno. We regret it very much,” he said. - Star Online, 3/9/2008,Najib: Umno apologises

We all know that even Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had said "I’ll make sure to tell him not to use it again"

Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi will personally see to it that Bukit Bendera Umno chief Datuk Ahmad Ismail does not repeat his remarks about the Chinese community.

“I will tell him not to do it again. You know in a campaign all sorts of things can come up. I don’t think he meant it. I’ll make sure to tell him not to use it again,” the Prime Minister said after chairing the Bertam Umno division meeting yesterday.

Ahmad had allegedly called the Chinese pendatang (immigrants) and was also reported to have said that “as the Chinese were only immigrants it was impossible to achieve equal rights amongst races” during a ceramah in Permatang Pauh in Aug 25.

He had allegedly uttered the remarks in the presence of Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. - Star, 31/8/2008 -Ahmad didn’t mean it, says Abdullah

I just read the Malaysiakini report 'Penang Umno backs Ahmad, snubs Pak Lah', and am very disturbed by this new turn of events about this whole issue surrounding alleged words used by the said Ahmad Ismail

Backed by all 13 Umno divisions from Penang, the embattled Bukit Bendera Umno division chief Ahmad Ismail today fervently defended his stand not to apologise for his alleged racist remarks against the Chinese community.

MCPX
All Penang Umno divisions, including Prime Minister and Umno president Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's Kepala Batas, fully supported Ahmad's stance, which erupted into a national furore since last week. - Malaysiakini, 5/9/2008 Penang Umno backs Ahmad, snubs Pak Lah
He also did issue a 16-page statement, which you can read in Malaysiakini at http://www.malaysiakini.com/doc/ahmad_ismail.php.

While I agree, that maybe injustice has been done to the said Ahmad Ismail by the media - with him not really been given the chance to respond and clarify earlier, I must state that there are many things in that current statement which is really unbecoming of an UMNO leader after 51 years of Independence. The statement only fuels divisions rather that forging unity of the Malaysian people.

At the same time, I do not think that Najib (who apparently was there when the remarks were made) would not have apologized if what had come out in the media was not true.
He had allegedly uttered the remarks in the presence of Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. - Star, 31/8/2008 -Ahmad didn’t mean it, says Abdullah
It is very important NOW that Anwar Ibrahim, the PKR, PAS and Pakatan Rakyat also respond strongly to this new statement, more so since it is coming from a person allegedly a Malay Muslim and the statement refers to Malaysian Chinese. If only the Malaysian leaders from the Chinese ethnic groups respond - it may provide an opportunity to cause a rift that may be exploited to even declare an emergency in light of threat of change of government by September 16.

Let not it be a fight between one ethnic group and another BUT rather between concerned progressive mature Malaysians against other conservative 'racial' divisive Malaysians.

We also wait and see how that Barisan Nasional (and/or UMNO) will react to what this minor UMNO member said about the President of one of the major BN parties.

Ahmad Ismail also forgets that human persons and migration is something that has always been happening. At the end of the day, we can only talk about who migrated here first, and who came later. Of course, the first people of Malaysia were the Orang Asli (Temuan, Negrito, Mah Meri, etc...) and in fact they are still the most impoverished and oppressed of the different Malaysian ethnic groups. Borders were created and changed from time to time - and at the end of the day, it was the colonial powers that ended up deciding where the borders are - and many a times, these are not at all the natural borders.

There has been so much of movement - so much so it is becoming more and more difficult to identify persons as being pure this ethnic group or that. Different ethnic groups have mixed - and today, we are more Malaysian than any ethnic group. Our Prime Minister is married to a Eurasian, a former Catholic Christian... Our former Prime Minister was said to have Malayalee blood flowing through his veins. We have so many in the West Coast who are Indonesian descendants..and in the North, there are many with Thai blood.

After 51 years, we must be talking about Malaysians - just Malaysians.

UNITY under a single Nation - one people should be the priority.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Malaysia should treat people based on love & care - not based on the kind of ID papers they hold, etc.

The present government in Malaysia (i.e. the BN government) and the next government in Malaysia (i.e. the Pakatan Rakyat government) must now state clearly their response and position with regard to issues concerning rights and realities migrants and their families.

One very humanitarian demands would be:-

Equal access to health care and medical facilities to ALL, irrespective of the status
- The practice of charging foreigners a lot more by government health care providers must stop
- The practice which requires an identity card/passport/formal papers before health care is provided must stop - realising that many are refugees.. or others that really do not have proper identification papers/documents - Human Care should supercede all such 'procedural requirements', that will deny access to medical treatment to the sick.
(A very bad proposal(in para 55) is to even suggest "health care insurance scheme" - because this will not cover all migrants, which also include the 'undocumented'. What happened to those without that "health care insurance" Just demand for FREE health care for all. )

Having read quickly, the statement below entitled "Malaysia National Consultation on the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers", which allegedly resulted after a 2-day meeting, i.e. on 13-14 August 2008 in Shah Alam, I must state that there are many GOOD things in that statement which I would have no problems with, and I have highlighted some of this in red.

I wonder really whether the participants had the opportunity to go through this lengthy 88 point statement with a fine-tooth-comb before agreeing with it, which I doubt. There are certain matters in this statement which are not correct (or inaccurate), some in ignorance of the reality, and some even which will have the effect of further depriving migrants of their rights. The statement also needs tightening up.

For example, Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) - that is what civil society is calling for, and I believe that is what this statement is talking about at para 52 not some new "Independent Commission for the Police".

Another example, with regard to domestic work - it is recognized in the law BUT the law specifically excludes rights and other protections in law that is accorded to other workers. So, what we want, is to remove these exclusions to enable domestic workers to enjoy all rights as other workers enjoy. Maybe, some additional provisions to deal with matters specific to domestic workers situation. { Para 29 states this "29. The Government should revise the Employment Act to ensure that domestic work is covered under the law and that domestic workers have recourse to redress under that law. ...}

There is also concern about only 'UNHCR-recognized refugees, etc'. Well. whilst the UNHCR is generally been doing good work BUT it also has its bias. The UNHCR allegedly does not accord those from the Shan State in Burma refugee status - and as such it may be best to talk about refugees, stateless persons, etc generally - not just limited to those accorded the status by just the UNHCR. By the way, how many Shan in Malaysia (or Thailand or anywhere) have been recognized as refugees by the UNHCR - and why this discrimination against the Shan?{para 60-65 deals with Refugees];

I do hope that organisations in Malaysia would carefully study this statement before endorsing it. Or maybe it be best left as a rough statement by invidual participants - not organisations.

Below a short write-up and that statement entitled "Malaysia National Consultation on the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers" , from the ALIRAN website:-

"...Representatives of civil society organisations and trade unions gathered in Shah Alam recently to conduct a National Consultation on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers under the auspices of the Task Force on Asean Migrant Workers mechanism. This is their collective statement.

National Statement

Malaysia National Consultation on the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers

13-14 August 2008
Shah Alam, Selangor

1. As representatives of civil society organizations and trade unions, we have gathered in Shah Alam, Selangor, on August 13-14, 2008 to conduct this National Consultation on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers under the auspices of the Task Force on ASEAN Migrant Workers mechanism. We recognize very clearly that Malaysia must play a central role in the deliberations and determinations of the framework of to protect and promote the rights of migrant workers in ASEAN because it is the destination country for the largest number of migrants in Asia. The economy and society of our country is integrally connected with the fate of these migrant workers since as many as 1/3 of the workers in our country are migrants. Yet for the major role that migration plays in the daily lives of Malaysians, we acknowledge that the policies of the Government of Malaysia towards migrant workers and their families have often been detrimental towards the rights of these migrants. Unfortunately, to date, the history of Malaysia’s treatment of migrants can best be characterized by the continued existence of many laws regulating migrant workers which remain largely unimplemented. We also see that there remain significant failures in good governance among civil servants at all levels when actions are taken to regulate migrant workers.

2. We believe that the fundamental problem that runs like a thread through Government migrant policy is the focus on treating migration as a matter of “security” rather than an issue that is more appropriately handled as a matter concerning “labour” by the Ministry of Human Resources. Migrants are invited to come to Malaysia to work and significant sectors of economy of our country remain dependent on their labour. Yet the Government continues to view migrants as a national security threat, and accordingly provided the leading role to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). In our view, the MHA has continuously mismanaged the policy towards migrant workers, setting out systems that provide the green light for employers to restrict workers’ rights and systematically exploit their vulnerability, which in turn ultimately drives migrant workers to flee their employers and join the swelling numbers of undocumented migrants. By creating a climate of fear among migrants, MHA has made the country less secure by undermining the kinds of policy initiatives need to effectively manage migration for the mutual benefit of migrant workers, employers, and Malaysian society at large.

3. In spite of its ratification of CEDAW, and the concluding comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women in 2006, the Government continues to fail to recognize the multiple sites and forms of discrimination experienced by migrant women, in particular domestic workers, including violations of employment rights, right to a life free from violence, right to reproductive rights, and the right to redress in cases of abuse and violations.

4. Malaysia has been the subject of sometimes severe criticism from neighboring nations in ASEAN about the treatment accorded to their nationals working in our country. In the spirit of a “sharing, caring ASEAN” to which we all aspire, we feel it is important that the Government of Malaysia receive this criticism positively, and take immediate steps to address the myriad problems that has been surfaced in these interventions. As representatives of Malaysian civil society and trade unions, starting from today we renew our commitment to do whatever we can to ensure Malaysia will play a much more positive role in ASEAN in promoting regional policies and mechanisms that respect and promote the rights of all migrant workers.

5. At the same time, it is also important to recognize that many of the NGOs, community-based organizations, and trade unions in Malaysia have worked diligently and selflessly to protect migrant workers, assist them with their needs, and intently involve them in discussions and actions aimed at empowering them to better defend their rights. Tens of thousands of migrants have benefited from this important work. Accordingly, we pledge to redouble our efforts, in cooperation with all stakeholders in Malaysia as well are diplomatic representatives and international organizations present in our country, to continuously work to build an atmosphere of acceptance and respect for the rights of migrant workers and their families.

6. Regarding the current situation of immigrants in Sabah, we believe that the Government’s current forced deportation of migrant workers, refugees and stateless persons constitutes intense human rights violations and will not resolve the root causes of the situation. Real solutions must come with recognition that the undocumented migrant workers, refugees and stateless persons in Sabah are deeply rooted in the fabric of local society and make major contributions to the economic growth of the state. Only by recognizing and legitimizing the presence of these persons will this serious situation be effectively and sustainably addressed.

Recommendations to the Government of Malaysia

Policy principles


7. As a leading country in ASEAN that is receiving migrant workers, Malaysia should effectively implement its commitment in article 8 of ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers, which states that Governments shall “promote fair and appropriate employment protection, payment of wages, and adequate access to decent working and living conditions for migrant workers.”

8. The Government should adopt a rights-based approach to migrant worker policy which adheres to the core principle of non-discrimination in all aspects of law and policy implementation.

9. With regards to terms and conditions of employment for migrant workers, Government policy should maintain “national treatment” as its core premise, meaning that migrant workers shall receive treatment no less favorable than that accorded to Malaysian workers.

10. To ensure that these principles are infused throughout all aspects of policy, the Government should immediately sign and ratify the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, and take all necessary steps to harmonize national laws with this Convention.

11. As a leading member of the ILO in the region, the Government of Malaysia should ensure that its treatment of migrant workers conforms with the ILO’s Decent Work Principles that call for respect for basic human rights, access to employment, safe and healthy working conditions, and social security.

12. We commend the Government for ratifying many of the core ILO Conventions, including Convention 29 (Forced Labour), 98 (Collective Bargaining), 100 (Equal Remuneration), 138 (Minimum Age), and 182 (Worst Forms of Child Labour).

13. We call on the Government to immediately ratify the remaining core ILO Conventions, including 87 (Freedom of Association) and 111 (Discrimination), and to reverse its decision to denounce its ratification of Convention 105 (Abolition of Forced Labour).We also call on the Government to undertake to ratify ILO Conventions 97 (Migration for Employment) and 143 (Migrant Workers).

14. As a member of the UN Council on Human Rights, we believe that it would be an important signal to the people of Malaysia, the migrant workers, and the international community for Malaysia to ratify without delay the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Policy determination, management and coordination

15. Jurisdiction for formulation and implementation of policies focusing on migrant workers should be transferred immediately from the MHA to the Ministry of Human Resources (MHR) which has the necessary expertise to oversee migrant workers policy as part of the overall labour policy. We believe that the MHR is best positioned to determine demands by employers for foreign labour, conduct workplace assessment and inspections, and to investigate and address complaints raised by migrant workers alleging problems at their workplace.

16. A new inter-ministerial coordination system on policies and practices towards migrants is needed to ensure effective implementation of migrant workers policy. This inter-ministerial/departmental body must be chaired by representative of the MHR and it should set up systems (coordinated by the MHR) to direct all matters pertaining to the recruitment, placement, and employment of migrant workers, and set out a clear policy outlining practical steps to be taken to increase the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers. Representation from the following Ministries will be required for this new inter-ministerial/department body – Human Resources (chair), Home Affairs, Health, Foreign Affairs, Women’s Affairs, and Education. This body should also actively reach out to civil society organizations and trade unions as it develops its policies.

17. MHA’s role should be restricted to handling the aspects of entry and exit of migrant workers only.

Recruitment and placement

18. The Government of Malaysia should immediately abolish the system of “outsourcing” under which 226 outsourcing companies have been issued licenses by the MHA but have operated with impunity in exploiting migrant workers and abusing their rights. Based on our experience, the “outsourcing” system has significantly fueled grievous abuses by creating bonded labour arrangements and effectively encouraging human trafficking for purposes of labour exploitation. This system serves to enrich only a select few brokers and their cronies while sullying the reputation of our country throughout the region.

19. In place of this system, the Government should negotiate bilateral agreements with labour sending countries based on a standardized agreement (developed in a transparent consultation process with Malaysian civil society and trade unions) that is in accordance with international labour standards. These agreements should contain clear information about sectors of work, and terms and conditions of work in those sectors. Direct employers would then be empowered to work through the MHR and these bilateral agreements to recruit the workers they need.

Any recruitment fees should be paid by the employer.

20. We recommend that the Government insist that as part of these arrangement, standardized migrant worker contracts would have to be signed in the sending country, specifying all terms and conditions of work, and made in both the migrant’s native language and English. These contracts should be developed in line with guidelines set by the MHR, and these guidelines should conform to international labour standards and set out minimum wages and conditions of work. Upon arrival, the Government should oversee the attestation of the contracts, and ensure that the contracts are recognized by employers and enforced. Government polices should be developed to severely punish cases of contract substitution by employers.

21. The Government should abolish the Foreign Worker Levy, which is a failed policy that further impoverishes migrant workers. The monies accumulated from the levy are not being provided for benefits or services for the migrant workers, and it has not had the intended effect of deterring employers from seeking foreign labour. Since the costs of the levy are passed to the worker, the levy has contributed to the deepening of debt bondage among workers.

22. The Government should mandate the creation of a pre-employment orientation program (in migrant workers’ native language) for migrant workers when they arrive in Malaysia, focusing on ensuring that migrant workers are aware of their rights and responsibilities under all relevant laws and policies concerning migrant workers and receive information about avenues to seek support and assistance in difficult situations. The Government must ensure that the costs of this orientation are borne fully by the employer and not passed on to the worker.

23. Our experience with numerous cases of migrant workers show that the tying of a migrant worker to one employer by contract, with provisions providing for immediate deportation if the worker is dismissed or otherwise unable to work, creates ideal conditions for exploitation of that worker. Therefore, we strongly recommend that the Government review and revise the Work Permit procedure, and provide workers the right to change employers through institution of a “portable” Work Permit registration system. The Government should also hold accountable those employers who negligently fail to renew their employees’ work permits.

24. The Government should consider amending the regulations for the Special Pass to provide longer periods of validity, and provide the Special Pass as a method of regularizing undocumented migrant workers who have lost their jobs through termination or other circumstances. The Special Pass could bridge the period of time while the migrant worker seeks and finds a new employer, and provide an avenue to seek a new Work Permit.

Working and living conditions


25. Migrant workers in Malaysia currently suffer from a wide variety of difficult, dangerous and dirty conditions in their work, and face significant challenges in earning sufficient wages to support themselves and provide support to their families back in labour-sending countries. In our experience, among the litany of abuses suffered by workers are long work hours and no days off, shifting placements, requirements to do multiple jobs, poor wages, lack of benefits, restrictions on the mobility and/or confinement to the workplace, poor housing conditions (connected to overcrowding, lack of proper food preparation and sleeping areas, lack of hygienic facilities for bathing and toilets), restrictions on seeking medical treatment, withholding of passport or other ID documents, denial of access to family and friends, prohibitions on practicing religion, and restrictions on their right to form associations or unions that can protect their rights. Migrant workers often suffer from contract substitution on arrival, compounded by employers’ failure to fulfill even the terms of the substituted contract – yet they can not leave their employer without fear of being fired and then immediately be deported.

26. The Government should implement a national minimum wage of 900 RM per month, supplemented by a 300 RM cost of living supplemental payment, and ensure that all migrant workers are paid no less than the minimum wage.

27. The Government should immediately revise the MHA policy connected to issuance of work permits which contains a prohibition on migrant workers joining associations of any kind. This policy is in violation of the Trade Union Act of 1959 and the Industrial Relations Act of 1967, both of which place no restrictions on the right of migrant workers to join unions. The Government should similarly take punitive action against employers inserting clauses into employment contracts that restrict or prohibit migrant workers from joining trade unions.

28. The Government should pro-actively proclaim its recognition of the right of migrant workers to establish, join, and hold positions in trade unions and should strongly enforce provisions in the law prohibiting harassment and dismissals of migrant workers for trade union activity.

29. The Government should revise the Employment Act to ensure that domestic work is covered under the law and that domestic workers have recourse to redress under that law. Policies should be established to ensure that domestic workers have at least one day off with pay per week, and that employers do not interfere in any way with migrant domestic workers’ right to communication with family members.

30. The Government should strictly enforce the provisions of the Passports Act of 1955 and sanction employers who seize and hold migrant worker’s passports. Furthermore, the Government should issue standard documentation (for example, migrant ID cards) for migrant workers, which can then be used by migrant workers to prove legal presence even in cases where they have had their lost their passport, or had their passport seized and held by the employer.

31. The Government has an obligation to safeguard the living and housing conditions of migrant workers and ensure that migrant workers are provide hygienic conditions and not subject to overcrowding. Migrant worker accommodations should comply with all applicable public health and housing regulations, as well as the Housing and Amenities Act. The MHR should play a leading role in coordinating with other Ministries and agencies to ensure that migrants are provided with appropriate accommodation and to penalize employers who continue to flout the requirement for safe and healthy housing for their workers.

32. The Government should insist that employers be responsible for the provision of nutritious food at reasonable cost in sufficient quantities to ensure continued good health of migrant workers, or provide sufficient and hygienic facilities, and opportunities to purchase raw ingredients, so that migrant workers can prepare their own food.

33. The Government should strictly apply and enforce the Occupational Safety and Health Act to protect the health of migrant workers. Workers injured in workplace accidents should have the right to compensation from their employer and from the Government. Compensation for injured migrant workers should be paid for the Social Security Act and not the Workman’s Compensation Act.

34. In terms of use of violence and sexual harassment against migrant workers, the Government should develop a Sexual Harassment Act which provides guidelines on stopping sexual harassment/violence. The Act should also include provisions that mandate effective education of employers about sexual harassment. The legislation should be developed in a participatory way with the involvement trade unions, employers and NGOs to ensure that the Act is both practical and can be effectively implemented. For migrants who suffer from violent attacks either inside or outside of the workplace, provision should be made to make counseling available to them.

Trafficking in persons


35. The Government is to be commended for the passage of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act (ATIP) which criminalizes trafficking in persons for all end purposes, but there are still significant problems in enforcement of the law that must be addressed. We are prepared to work closely with the Government to achieve effective implementation of the law, but this requires the commitment of key Government agencies to work with us in a transparent, sincere and honest manner as respected partners who have the interests of the victims at heart.

36. The Government should provide effective training to key officials of the agencies mandated under the Act to ensure they understand the procedures of implementation and enforcement of the Act, methods of identification of victims, and use of appropriately gender sensitive procedures which will protect victims.

37. The Government should also educate its personnel on the issues surrounding trafficking for labour exploitation so that law enforcement personnel are able to understand trafficking occurs in many forms and for many end purposes, and not only just sex trafficking.

38. In cases where corruption among Government officials is reasonably suspected to have occurred in relation to human trafficking, the Government must take strict, fast and effective measures to identify those responsible and take appropriate actions, including dismissal and action against them under law.

39. To provide adequate support for victims of human trafficking, the Government should dedicate resources and personnel to open shelter(s) in each State.

40. In order to ensure effective enforcement of the ATIP Act and the root causes that facilitate trafficking in persons, the Government must enact a Whistleblowers/Witness Protection Act.

41. The Government should pay special attention to the protection of highly vulnerable groups, such as stateless persons, asylum seekers, and refugees to ensure that they do not fall victim to trafficking.

Law enforcement and access to justice


42. Arrest and detention of undocumented migrant workers should be treated as an administrative offense, and not a criminal matter.

43. The Government should immediately disband RELA because the original rationale for their existence is no longer valid, they poorly trained in law and law enforcement, and as a unit, they are responsible for significant abuses of their powers and human rights abuses which have brought much criticism against Malaysia from the international community. Moreover, there is little indication that they are screened in hiring, their authority is ill-defined and arbitrary, and methods of oversight and accountability are not sufficiently transparent to inspire our confidence. Accordingly, RELA’s entire resources should be re-allocated to official law enforcers like the police, and to building up the capacity and personnel (possibly through new hires) of the police.

44. The Government’s use of whipping to penalize workers arrested for immigration offences must immediately be stopped, and the Government should ratify the UN Convention Against Torture to ensure that these practices cease permanently.

45. We believe the Government is responsible for ensuring that migrant workers are given an avenue to access and pursue justice. The current dysfunctional system of the “Special Pass” needs significant attention and reform. The duration of the Special Pass (one month) is too short, and the criteria for granting it are unclear and should be clarified. Therefore, the Government should endorse and implement the proposal of the Malaysian Bar Council “Memorandum Relating to Special Pass”, dated 16 July 2008, and immediately implement the following policies contained in that memorandum:

  • Allowing migrant workers in legal procedures to work – by creating a process to allow a migrant worker to pursue legal remedies by issuing workers with a “special pass” followed by a “visit pass”. The special pass provides would provide the opportunity for the worker to stay in Malaysia and seek employment while their court case is proceeding, and then if they locate employment, the visit pass could be issued to allow the migrant to work until the final resolution of the migrant worker’s court case;
  • A policy decision should be taken to allow the “visit pass” to be issued to migrants for temporary employment but to waive the requirement for the visit pass to only be given to a foreigner who is outside the country when applying;
  • Eliminate unreasonable requirements – such as the need to secure a letter from a Court – before the special pass can be issued;
  • Waive the 100 RM a month cost for the special pass;
  • Fast-track applications of migrant workers when processing the special pass and the visit pass.

46. Migrant workers, regardless of status, should have the right to access justice. The Government should recognize the continuum of legal rights of a migrant worker, regardless of his/her immigration status, and make provisions to enable them to realize this right.

47. The Government should provide resources to extend legal aid to migrant workers, thereby supplementing the efforts of NGOs and the Malaysian Bar Council.

48. Access to justice requires that migrant workers understand the legal proceedings which they are involved in. The Government must develop effective and practical mechanisms to provide translation and interpretation services for migrant workers with cases before the Courts.

49. The Special Courts set up in detention centers remain isolated from provisions such as legal aid/right to legal representation, interpretation services, access to prepare a defense, and other requirements required for the realistic delivery of justice. The Government should immediately integrate immigration cases into the main legal system, and end use of Special Courts in detention centers.

50. The Government should immediately establish and empower an independent Commission of Inquiry to investigate the prevailing conditions and treatment of migrant detainees in detention centers. The Government should provide the Commission with resources and personnel sufficient to conduct a full inquiry and ensure the full cooperation of all Government officials with the Commission. The final report should be made public and the recommendations fully considered for implementation by the Government.

51. The Government should adhere to the United Nation Basic Principles for the Treatment of Prisoners 1990 and end punishment/whipping of migrant workers in detention centers.

52. Finally, to counter well-documented allegations of continuing corruption among law enforcement officials, the Government should establish an Independent Commission for the Police.

Health, safety, education and social dimensions affecting migrants

53. Mandatory health testing shall not be a pre-condition for employment. The Government should employ a rights-based approach towards the testing of the health of migrant workers, including voluntary testing, with provision of counseling and access to treatment for migrant workers.

54. The Government should cease mandatory testing for HIV and other treatable diseases for migrant workers while also providing access for treatment for migrant workers through the public health system so that they can recover their health. Workers who wish to change employers to enable them to better recover their health (such as moving to less physically challenging job, or moving to a job closer to the hospital/health facility where they are being treated) should be permitted to do through the use of “Special Pass” until they find a new job and receive a new Work Permit.

55. In line with the principles of non-discrimination, and to support better and more effective public health response for Malaysian society (since migrants compose one-third of the work force), it is imperative for the Government to allow migrant workers access and enjoyment of the same medical benefits that Malaysian citizens are entitled to in the public health system. Health care service should be provided to migrants irregardless of status, and special attention should be placed on provision of gender sensitive health care information, and reproductive health information and services for all migrants. One alternative that the Government should consider is to create a high quality, portable health care insurance scheme – with the proviso that it should not be prohibitively expensive and employers should pay the costs for migrants.

56. Migrant workers being held in detention centers face significant challenges to their health as a result of overcrowding, unhygienic conditions, and maltreatment. Current access to detention centers is quite limited, with treatment usually only available through a medical orderly based at the detention centers and some access by NGOs to operate mobile clinics. The Government should provide significantly increased access to detention centers by international agencies and NGOs so as to enable them to provide additional support for health care in the centers. More nutritious food should be provided, and efforts made to address other conditions deleterious to good health in the centers.

57. In light of its commitment as a signatory to CEDAW, the Government should end its policy of deporting pregnant migrant workers.

58. In line with its commitment as a signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Government should provide free education for all including for children of migrant workers, refugees, asylum seekers and stateless persons, and should ensure that children of migrants are provided with documents that allow them equal access to the same health care services that are received by a Malaysian child.

59. The right to love and marry should be inviolable, and the Government should end policies that penalize marriage with loss of employment. For foreign workers who marry a Malaysian citizen, the person should be able to independently apply for, receive, and renew a spouse visa.

Refugees and stateless persons

60. The Government of Malaysia should immediately ratify the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, and recognize the status of those persons screened and accepted as refugees by the Office of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). The Government should scrupulously respect the principle of non-refoulement and set out appropriate procedures with UNHCR to ensure that refugees are not deported.

61. The Government should ensure civil servants and law enforcement officials at federal, state and local levels respect the inviolability of UNHCR documents issued to refugees, and issue directives forbidding confiscation or destruction of said documents. We recommend that directives be made by the Government to officials at all that levels that in cases where a person carrying UNHCR issued documents is detained, the office of UNHCR shall be immediately informed and arrangements made for the release of the person into the care of UNHCR.

62. The Government should provide UNHCR-recognized refugees with the right to work under the applicable laws and regulations governing the employment of migrant workers in Malaysia.

63. The Government should provide access to detention centers by UNHRC officials to allow them to screen for asylum seekers.

64. In line with Malaysia’s commitments as a signatory to the CRC, all children in Malaysia should be given birth registration regardless of the status of their parents.

65. Government shall publicly recognize the right of stateless persons, especially children, to access social services such as education, healthcare, and other important services.

Recommendations to the Malaysian Parliament


66. We recommend that the Parliamentarians of Malaysia should play a leading role in forming a new Labour and Migration Caucus at the forthcoming meeting of ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA) which will be held in Singapore on September 18, 2008. This Caucus should be tasked with intervening with the national Governments and the ASEAN Secretariat to ensure follow-up action is taken to fully implement the commitments made by the ASEAN governments in the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers.

Recommendations to Suhakam

67. We applaud the Declaration of Cooperation in Bali made on June 26-28, 2007 between the four national human rights institutions established in ASEAN, which includes Suhakam and the national human rights institutions of Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. One of the areas of work to be undertaken under that Declaration is “protection of human rights of migrants and migrant workers.” Leadership in this area has been assigned to Suhakam. We believe that it is critical for Suhakam to play a dynamic leadership role on human rights of migrants, and we call for Suhakam to immediately convene a workshop in Malaysia, hosting its fellow national human rights institutions, to launch a campaign of closer cooperation among these institutions on the issue of migrant worker rights in ASEAN. We believe that Suhakam and its fellow national human rights institutions should deepen the regional commitment to protect and promote the rights of migrant workers. The proposed meeting should set out a plan of action for the four national human rights institutions to move forward on common activities on the portfolio of migrant workers rights in ASEAN. These activities should be planned and implemented in coordination with civil society organization and trade unions, and the members of the Task Force on ASEAN Migrant Workers.

Recommendations to Asean

Policies affecting migrant workers and their families

68. We urge the Member States of ASEAN to immediately ratify all eight core ILO Conventions1, and ensure that their national labour laws, especially those laws governing migrant workers, are harmonized with the standards contained in those core ILO Conventions.

69. We further urge all the Member States of ASEAN to ratify ILO migrant worker Conventions 97, 143 and 181 as well as the UN International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of Migrant Workers and Their Families.

70. We strongly recommend that the ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers shall be considered to apply to all migrant workers present in ASEAN countries, regardless of their country of origin.

71. The ASEAN Governments should collectively ensure the implementation of the Vientiane Action Program concerning human rights matters.

72. ASEAN should play a critical role in consultation with the member Governments of both labour sending and receiving countries to ensure that intending migrant workers are not charged exorbitant recruitment fees to secure foreign employment. Excessively high recruitment fees only serve to deepen the debt of a migrant worker, contributing to vulnerability to debt bondage and trafficking.

73. The Governments of ASEAN should recognize the phenomenon of “statelessness” in the region, and seriously consider the fact that lack of status greatly increases the vulnerability of stateless migrant workers to exploitation. Accordingly, the Governments should publicly acknowledge the right of all persons to health and education services and acknowledge and recognize birth certificates issued by any ASEAN Government.

74. The right of all citizens of ASEAN countries to hold their own passports and Government-issued identity documents should be considered inviolable. This principle contrasts with the reality that brokers, agents, and employers routinely and systematically seize their passports and documents. Member States of ASEAN should adopt a clear no-tolerance policy that imposes tough punishments on all persons who seize or hold migrant workers’ documents.

75. The Member States of ASEAN are urged to ensure that migrant domestic workers are specifically included in coverage of the national labour law.

76. All the member Governments of ASEAN have ratified both the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), and the UN Convention on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). Therefore, in compliance with the provisions of the CRC and CEDAW, each Government must ensure that all children born to migrant workers should be provided with birth registration and access to education and health care.

77. Since all ASEAN Governments have ratified CEDAW, they should ensure the rights of migrant women, particularly domestic workers, are protected and that in cases of violations and abuse that there are viable avenues of redress, including effective laws, policies and programs which are in accordance with the principles of equality and non-discrimination.

78. Since it is clearly recognized that there is a trend of increasing feminization of migration in ASEAN, we strongly believe that the Member States of ASEAN should set out clear gender-sensitive policies on migration, and ensure that Government practices towards migrants reflect these gender specific migration policies.

79. Each Government of a labour-sending countries should clearly designate a focal point within their Embassy in each labour-receiving country to handle complaints and problems faced by their nationals who are migrant workers. Shelters or safe house arrangements should be made by each Embassy to support their migrant workers in serious distress.

80. The Member States of ASEAN should immediately ensure the end of all arrangements which devolve law enforcement authority over migrants to persons who are not law enforcement officials with permanent civil servant status in the Government. It is vital that the Member States of ASEAN take clear steps to protect all migrant workers from any form of human rights abuse perpetrated by civilian auxiliaries/groups.

81. Recognizing that quality of health of a migrant worker does not just affect the worker, but also his/her family residing in the country of origin, we recommend that the Member States of ASEAN create an effective scheme of high quality, portable health care insurance for migrant workers

82. ASEAN should develop a regional system, in coordination with civil society and representatives of migrants, which steps away from the current emphasis on mandatory testing of migrant workers for HIV. The new system would be based on voluntary testing of migrant workers and ensure universal access to treatment for those who test positive.

83. Given the importance of migrant worker remittances to the economy of the migrant’s origin country, a dependable, accessible, and low-cost system for transmitting remittances in ASEAN is vital. The Member States of ASEAN are urged to support the creation of such a remittances system, whether implemented by the private sector, trade unions and civil society organizations, or Government agencies.

84. All ASEAN countries should publicly acknowledge international migrant’s day (December 18) and grant a public holiday to migrant workers to celebrate this important day for affirming their rights.

Asean processes and steps forward

85. We recommend the ASEAN Member Governments should agree that the “instrument on the protection and promotion of the rights of migrant workers” to be developed (as called for in paragraph 22 of the ASEAN Declaration on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Migrant Workers) will be a binding instrument on ASEAN Member States.

86. The National Consultation strongly encourages the ASEAN Secretariat to take pro-active and immediate steps to encourage each member Government of ASEAN to immediately appoint their national focal point to the ASEAN Committee to Implement (ACI) the Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers, as called for in the resolution adopted by the ASEAN Foreign Ministers on July 30, 2007.

87. When constituted, the ASEAN Committee to Implement (ACI) should take immediate steps to formulate the ASEAN Instrument for the Protection and Promotion of Migrant Workers (as called for in Article 22 of the ASEAN Declaration on Migrants), and should ensure the Framework Instrument contributes directly to the harmonization of national labour laws of ASEAN members with the eight ILO core Labour Conventions and the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families. The Member States of ASEAN should give those focal points the necessary authority, and task them to engage substantively with the Task Force as it develops civil society’s draft ASEAN Framework Instrument on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers.

88. Reflecting the fact that migration frequently involves movement across borders, ASEAN should develop an effective regional collabourative mechanism to work on issues of labour migration and human trafficking focusing on the predicament of undocumented migrant workers and their families, and stateless persons.


Done in Shah Alam, Selangor
14 August 2008