Tuesday, December 01, 2015

Drop the criminal charges against Women Human Rights Defender Lena Hendry;

Lena Hendry is no politician or some 'famous' personality in Malaysia. She is simply a woman Human Rights Defender. Her trial starts in less than  15 days, and if convicted, she is facing ‘…fine of not less than five thousand ringgit and not more than thirty thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to both…’ 

Her trial has been fixed for 14-15 December, and 6-8 January 2016. [You can contact Lena at lenahendry@komas.org]. Now, further information could be obtained from  website maintained by the 'In Defence of  Lena Hendry's Campaign Team' -  http://komas.org/indefenceoflenahendry/

LET US REITERATE OUR  Call on the Malaysian Government to immediately and unconditionally drop the criminal charges against Lena Hendry;

 

DROP THE CHARGES AGAINST MALAYSIAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER LENA HENDRY NO TO PRE-CENSORSHIP OR PRIOR APPROVAL FOR USAGE OF FILM/VIDEOS

Joint Statement – 2/10/2013
DROP THE CHARGES AGAINST MALAYSIAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER LENA HENDRY
NO TO PRE-CENSORSHIP OR PRIOR APPROVAL FOR USAGE OF FILM/VIDEOS
We, the  116  undersigned  civil society groups, trade unions and organizations are shocked that the Malaysian government, after the recent General Election has resorted to charging human rights defender Lena Hendry on 19 September 2013 for being involved in the screening of a documentary "No Fire Zone: The Killing Fields of Sri Lanka" at a human rights event in Kuala Lumpur on  9 July 2013.

Lena Hendry was charged for an offence under the Film Censorship Act 2002, in connection with the screening of a video  which  was not  vetted and approved by the Film Censorship Board of Malaysia. If convicted, she faces the sentence of a ‘…fine of not less than five thousand ringgit and not more than thirty thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to both…’ She is charged under Section 6 of the Act that makes it an offence to, amongst others, to produce, manufacture, have in one’s possession, circulate, distribute and display such film or film-publicity material which has not been approved by the Board. This may include video material ranging from family videos, videos of political and human rights material including recordings of forums and speeches, videos about citizen rights including the right to free and fair elections or worker rights, and even videos about rights violations in other countries including Palestine.

A ‘…videotape, diskette, laser disc, compact disc, hard disc and other record of a sequence of visual images, being a record capable of being used as a means of showing that sequence as a moving picture, whether or not accompanied by sound…”, is also included in the definition of ‘film’ as provided for in Section 3 of the Film Censorship Act. It is absurd that in Malaysia, the law requires one to get approval of the Malaysia’s Film Censorship Board for all such material.

The Act is also discriminatory as it does not apply, amongst others, to “...any film sponsored by the Federal Government or the Government of any State...”. The government does not need to obtain approval from the Censorship Board, but everyone else is expected to do so.

At present, the practice of getting approval from the Film Censorship Board usually applies to films screened in cinemas and cineplexes to a paying audience. Even when it comes to television, it is believed that there may be no pre-requirement for getting approval from the Censorship Board for all that is shown except for feature movies.

The charging of Lena Hendry in September 2013 by the Malaysia government is seen as an effort to limit access to information and alternative views particularly those highlighting human rights violations and alternative perspectives. This violates individual and civil society and public rights to information, freedom of expression and opinion.

If the screening and usage of such material incites a criminal act, or violates another person’s rights, there are existing laws to address this. There is no requirement for any prior government approval or ‘censorship’.


In Reporters Without Borders’ 2013 World Press Freedom Index, Malaysia has fallen to its lowest-ever position because of the decreasing access to information. Malaysia embarrassingly dropped 23 places, and now ranks 145 out of 179.

Article 1 of the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms states clearly that “Everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to promote and to strive for the protection and realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms at national and international levels.”

Lena Hendry, has the right to ‘…freely publish, impart or disseminate to others views, information and knowledge on all human rights and fundamental freedoms…’, and that should include the right to use films, documentaries and other video materials.

To advocate a policy or a law that says that film or video material must be pre-approved by the government before it can be used is in itself a violation of principles of human rights and the UN Human Rights Defender Declaration.

Therefore, we

a)   Call on the Malaysian Government to immediately and unconditionally drop the criminal charges against Lena Hendry;

b)   Call for the repeal of provisions in the Film Censorship Act 2002 that obligates persons to seek approval of the government vis-à-vis the Film Censorship Board before a film, videotape, diskette, laser disc, compact disc, hard disc and other record of a sequence of visual images can be used;

c)  Call on the Malaysian government to recognize, promote and respect human rights, including those contained in the UN Human Rights Defenders Declaration


Charles Hector
Pranom Somwong
For and on behalf the 116 organisations listed below
ALIRAN
All Women’s Action Society (AWAM), Malaysia
Angkatan Rakyat Muda (ARM), Malaysia
Aksi  For Gender, Social And Ecological Justice, Indonesia
ASEAN Youth Assembly
Asia Pacific Forum on Women, law and Development (APWLD)
Academy of Tamil Studies, Malaysia
Boat People SOS
Burma Partnership
Cambodian Human Rights Association ( ADHOC )
Campaign for a Life of Dignity for All (KAMP), Philippines
Civil Right Committee of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall, Malaysia
Center for Orang  Asli Concerns (COAC), Malaysia
Centre of Education. Research and Development (CEDAR) Malaysia
Centre for Independent Journalism, Malaysia
Child Development Initiative Malaysia
Committee for a Workers' International (CWI), Malaysia
Community Action Network, Malaysia
Community Resource Centre
Council of Temples Malaysia
Dapur Jalanan Kuala Lumpur
Dignity International
Empower Foundation, Thailand
ENGAGE
Federation of Indian Non-Governmental Organisations
Foundation for Women, Thailand
Friends of Burma, Chiang Mai
Gabungan Pertubuhan-pertubuhan Masyarakat India Selangor
Gender and Development Advocates (GANDA) Filipinas
Group of Concerned Citizens Malaysia
Human Rights Ambassador for Salem-News.com, UK
Human Rights Working Group (HRWG) Indonesia
Indian Malaysian Active Generation (IMAGE) Malaysia
Islamic Renaissance Front (IRF) , Malaysia
JERIT, Malaysia
Kelab Bangsar Utama, Malaysia
Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja Pekerja Perusahaan Alat Alat Pengangkutan Dan Sekutu(NUTEAIW)
Kesatuan Sekerja Industri Elektronik Wilayah Selatan Semenanjung Malaysia (KSIEWSSM)
Kuala Lumpur Indian Entrepreneurs and Professionals
Law and Society Trust, Colombo Sri Lanka
LLG Cultural Development Centre, Malaysia
MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)
Malaysian Association of Indian University Graduates
Malaysian Dravidian Association
Malaysians for Beng Hock
Malaysian Hindu Youth Council
Malaysian Indian Business Association
Malaysian Indian Development & Unity Association
Malaysian Indian Entrepreneurs and Professionals
Malaysian Indian Historical Association
Malaysia Indian Progressive Educational Society
Malaysian Indian Youth Development Foundation
Malaysian Physicians for Social Responsibility
Malaysia Youth & Students Democratic Movement
Malaysia Tamil Artiste Association
MAP Foundation, Thailand
MARUAH, Singapore
Migrant CARE
MTUC(Malaysian Trade Union Congress) Pahang
National Union of Bank Employees, Malaysia (NUBE)
Nationwide Human Development And Research Centre Malaysia
Network of Action for Migrants in Malaysia ( NAMM)
Network for Democracy and Development
Parti Rakyat Malaysia(PRM)
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM)
Pax Romana ICMICA
Peace Institute of Cambodia
Peace Women Across the Globe Indonesia
Peoples' Empowerment Foundation (PEF), Thailand
Peoples Service Organisation (PSO) , Malaysia
PERGERAKAN Indonesia
Perkumpulan Tafena Tabua, Kupang - Indonesia
Persahabatan Semparuthi Johore, Malaysia 
Persatuan Alumni PBTUSM KL & Selangor
Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER)
Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor & Wilayah Persekutuan (PERMAS)
Persatuan Sahabat Wanita, Selangor (PSWS), Malaysia
Projek Dialog, Malaysia
SABM Melbourne, Australia
Sahabat Rakyat Working Committee, Malaysia
SALT(School of Acting Justly Loving Tenderly and Treading Humbly), Malaysia
Sarawak Dayak Iban Association
Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia (SABM)
Selangor Indian Entrepreneurs and Professionals
Semparuthi Iyakkam Malaysia
Sisters In Islam, Malaysia
SUARAM (Suara Rakyat Malaysia)
Tenaganita, Malaysia
The Asian Muslim Action Network (Aman) Indonesia
The Association of Women Lawyers, Malaysia
The Filipino Women's Organization in Quebec, Canada
VIVAT International-Indonesia
WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)
Women's Centre for Change (WCC) Penang
Women's Network for the Advancement and Peace, Thailand
Women's Rehabilitation Center (WOREC) Nepal
World Tamil Federation – Malaysian Chapter
Writer Alliance for Media Independence (WAMI), Malaysia
Yaung Chi Oo Workers Association, Thailand
Yayasan LINTAS NUSA Batam - Indonesia
Youth for Peace Cambodia
Advocacy and Policy Institute (API), Cambodia
Labour Behind the Lablel, United Kingdom
ARTICLE 19
Forum for Democracy in Burma
Bersihkan Malaysia Perth, Australia
Women's Aid Organisation, Malaysia
WAC, Phillipines
Housing Rights Task Force, Cambodia.
NLD LA Malaysia
Tourism Employees Association of Maldives" (TEAM)
CEREAL (Centro de Reflexión y Acción Laboral)
 
Cividep India
Think Centre, Singapore
Kesatuan Pekerja Pekerja Polyplastics Asia Pacific, Malaysia
PROHAM -Persatuan Promosi Hak Asasi Manusia

Human Rights Day Program (7/12/2015) for those interested?





UNITED NATIONS
MALAYSIA









1.   



On behalf of our partners, the United Nations Country Team in Malaysia
cordially invites

You and/or your Representative
……………..………………………………………………………………………………….

 TO THE COMMEMORATION OF Human Rights DAY 2015
&
PANEL DISCUSSION
“RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AS A FOUNDATION FOR AN INCLUSIVE FUTURE”

Date:      Monday, 7 December 2015
Time:      9.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m.
Venue:    Ballroom B, Renaissance Hotel Kuala Lumpur
                   Jalan Sultan Ismail, Kuala Lumpur

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), the Global Movement of Moderates Foundation (GMMF), the Bar Council Malaysia and the Society for the Promotion of Human Rights (PROHAM) and the United Nations Country Team in Malaysia are commemorating Human Rights Day on 7th of December under the theme of Rights and Freedoms as a Foundation for an Inclusive Future’.  This day invites us to reflect on the importance of promoting and protecting the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all people when moving forward to an inclusive and prosperous future anchored on people.  

The event will be launched by YB Senator Datuk Paul Low Seng Kuan, Minister in Prime Minister’s Department in Charge of Human Rights, Governance and Integrity, and will be followed by a Panel discussion echoing the voices of various vulnerable groups and communities in the Malaysian society. Each panellist will offer their perspective on how to unleash the full potential, capacities and abilities of people of all ages and backgrounds to contribute to inclusive sustainable development and how development outcomes can be shared more equitably. The afternoon session will present a diverse programme to show how civil society are advocating for human rights in Malaysia. Various groups will be hosting booths and exhibitions during the afternoon, and a human library will be showcased allowing participants to be part of a journey of human stories that are bound to challenge and inspire us to act for human dignity.


Human Rights DAY 2015
7 DECEMBER 2015

PROVISIONAL PROGRAMME

9.00 – 9.30 am
Arrival of Guests
9.30 – 9.40 am
Poetry Performance 
9.40 – 9.50 am
Welcoming Remarks
YBhg. Tan Sri Hasmy Agam, Chairperson, Human Rights Commission of Malaysia, SUHAKAM

9.50 – 10.10 am
Opening Statement
YB Senator Datuk Paul Low Seng Kuan, Minister in the Prime Minister’s
Department in charge of Governance, Human Rights and Integrity

10.10 – 10.30 am
Tea Break

Panel Discussion:
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as a Foundation for an Inclusive Future

10.30 – 12.30 pm

Moderator: Mr. Wan Saiful Wan Jan of Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS)
1.      Anderson Selvasegaram, Executive Director of SUKA Society
2.      Francis Johen, Commissioner, SUHAKAM (PWD)
3.      Nisha Ayub, Project Manager, SEED Foundation
4.      Shanti Dairiam, Former member of the  CEDAW Committee
5.      Syed Saddiq, Student and University Lecturer , IIUM (TBC)
6.      Yusri Ahon, JOAS President (Orang Asli community in Pahang) (TBC)

Questions & Answers

12.30 – 14.00 pm
Lunch
14.00-14.10 pm
Remarks by:
Ms Michelle Gyles-McDonnough, United Nations Resident Coordinator;
UNDP Representative for Malaysia, Singapore & Brunei Darussalam,
UNFPA Representative for Malaysia
14.10-16.00 pm
·        Exhibition by various CSOs and international organisations
·        A human library by SCOPE Group




RSVP FORM


                  I   will   be attending the Human Rights Day 2015 commemoration on 7 Dec. 2015

              
               I   will not  be attending the Human Rights Day 2015  commemoration on 7 Dec. 2015              

The representative from my office will be:

                             
                              Name:   ___________________________________________________

               Designation:  _______________________________________________

               ___________________________________________________________

              
Name of Organization: ­­­­­­­­­­­_________________________________________

____________________________________________________________

Email:  ______________________________________________________






Kindly please reply by 3 December 2015
Please reply by fax at: 03-2095 2870 or call :
Linda Tham @ Tel: 2091 5116 or email: linda.tham@one.un.org





Would Najib and Malaysia save the life Sarawakian Iban boy facing death penalty in Singapore?

Kho Jabing, a  31-year-old Sarawakian of Chinese-Iban ethnicity, faces the gallows for killing a Chinese construction worker with a tree branch back in 2008 during a robbery attempt. Was this even per-meditated murder? Robbery is certainly a serious crimes, but I believe that the death was an unfortunate outcome. Punished he must, but certainly not hanged to death. 

In August 2013, The High Court reviewed his case, and changed his death sentence to life imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.

But, the prosecution was not happy and appealed to the Court of Appeal, who sentenced Jabing to death in a 3-2 majority decision. [So, 2 judges out of 5 felt that Kho Jabing did not deserve to hang for his crimes]

Kho Jabing is said to be 31 in 2015 - and in 2008, he would have been only 23 or 24 years old... a very young man.

His mother Lenduk Ak Baling, 54, said that her son was not a bad person and had regretted his actions deeply."From the time he was born until he was in school he never fought with his friends, teachers or anyone else … He is not a bad person,"

It is disturbing that some Malaysian political parties and groups get interested based on the ethnicity and the religion of the person facing execution in a foreign country.

Would Prime Minister Najib do anything about saving the life of this young Sarawakian lad who certainly do not deserve to be hanged to death?

 

 

 

Singapore, Malaysia

Malaysian on S'pore death row: Malaysia mulls abolishing mandatory death sentences

Photo: The Star/ANN
KUCHING - The case of Jabing Kho, the Sarawakian on death row in Singapore, is having an impact on Malaysia's capital punishment.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Nancy Shukri said on Sunday abolishing the mandatory death sentence is a 'priority' for her.

Currently, the matter is in the drafting state, she said, adding a bill could be presented to Parliament by March.

"This is one of the most important ones (bills) to me. It's very difficult... especially when we have to face Kho's case.

"We go to appeal (in Singapore) and yet we also have the same kind of law," Nancy said here on Sunday.

"The death penalty will still be there but minus (it being) mandatory, meaning we are giving the power back to the courts."

"Last year, Malaysia executed two on death row, both for murder, she said.

"The country has not executed those found guilty for drug offences for sometime. "We are keeping them in jail. We hope they get their pardons from state rulers," Nancy said.

As of this October, there are 1,022 prisoners on death row in Malaysia. Since 1998, a total of 33 have been executed in Malaysia.

On Kho, the minister said neither the Federal nor state governments have heard from Singapore since November 23, the day its court reserved judgement on the Sarawakian's bid to review his death sentence.

Malaysia and Sarawak's stand was still to urge for clemency, hoping Kho's death penalty would be converted to a life imprisonment.

However, Nancy said, because it was a murder case, "normally, they would not give any clemency".

"We'll just have to wait. The Federal Government had done its part. Now, the State Government is appealing based on humanitarian grounds.

"On record, I must say we respect the laws of another country, which is also why Malaysia is mulling abolishing mandatory death sentences."

She said Kho's case had made it clear this was "exactly the kind of situation that can put us in an awkward place" if another country were to appeal for clemency to Malaysia.

Kho, a 31-year-old Sarawakian of Chinese-Iban ethnicity, was scheduled to hang on November 6, but was awarded a temporary reprieve less than 24 hours to his execution after his lawyer filed a criminal motion at the Singaporean Court of Appeal on November 4 for remittance.

He was convicted for the murder of a construction worker in 2008.

Nancy was speaking to reporters after a charity fundraiser for the Sarawak Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Kuching yesterday.

Earlier this month, Attorney-General Tan Sri Apandi Ali said he would propose to the Cabinet that the mandatory death penalty be scrapped.

He said mandatory death sentences were a "paradox" as it robbed judges of their discretion to impose sentences on convicted criminals.- AsiaOne.Com, 29/11/2015



Singapore, Malaysia

Kho Jabing's family pleads to Singapore for clemency

Jabing's mother, Lenduk Ak Baling, 54, said that her son was not a bad person and had regretted his actions deeply.
Photo: The Star
KUALA LUMPUR: The family of Kho Jabing is pleading with Singapore to commute his death sentence to life imprisonment, claiming he is not a bad person.

Jabing, 31, who is from Ulu Baram, Sarawak faces the gallows for killing a Chinese construction worker with a tree branch back in 2008 during a robbery attempt.
 

His mother Lenduk Ak Baling, 54, said that her son was not a bad person and had regretted his actions deeply.

"From the time he was born until he was in school he never fought with his friends, teachers or anyone else … He is not a bad person," she said sobbing uncontrollably at a press conference to highlight the case on Friday.

Lenduk said that she hadn't been able to sleep or eat properly since hearing that her son was going to be executed.

Jabing was scheduled to be executed on Nov 6 but received a stay the day before, after his lawyer filed a motion raising points of law about the way the case was handled.

The case will be heard by Singapore's Court of Appeal on Nov 23.

Jabing's sister Jumai Kho, 27, said that her family was initially shocked to learn that he was involved in the case.

"He isn't a bad person … he is loving and always took care of us. I hope Singapore won't give him the death penalty … He is the only brother I have," she said adding that Jabing was drunk and influenced by his friends when the incident occurred.

At the press conference, several activist groups called on Singapore president Tony Tan to grant clemency to Jabing.

We Believe in Second Chances founder Kirsten Han said that the group was troubled that Jabing would be executed for a simple majority decision by the Court of Appeal.

"No intent to kill was ever found, nor was a clear sequence of events established. The irreversible nature of the death penalty leaves absolutely no room for error," she said.

Jabing was sentenced to death in 2010 but in August 2013, following revisions to Singapore's mandatory death penalty laws, the High Court sentenced him to life and 24 strokes of the cane instead.

The prosecution challenged the decision before the Court of Appeal, which again sentenced Jabing to death in a 3-2 majority decision earlier this year. On Oct 19, Singapore president Tony Tan rejected a clemency petition before a stay of execution by the Court of Appeal. - AsiaOne.Com, 13/11/2015