Friday, March 27, 2009

If you do not want Najib as PM - off your lights at 8:30 pm, Saturday(28/3/2009)...mmm

A friend of mine just told me that we will be having a national referendum of sorts - i.e. to get the Malaysian public to indicate whether they want Mohd Najib Razak as the next Prime Minister of Malaysia..

If we do not want him as the next Prime Minister - then we are supposed to off our lights at 8.30pm this Saturday (28/3/2009) , whereby Saturday being the last day of that UMNO General Assembly that made him the President of UMNO - as such, by convention possibly the next Prime Minister...

Interesting and creative means of doing a referendum....mmm

Off your lights - if you do not want Najib as the next PM..

Keep your lights on if you want Najib as the next PM...

Anyway, Najib can only become Prime Minister if the current PM resigns,

AND Najib can show that he enjoys the confidence of the majority of them MPs (see earlier posts:- Golden Opportunity if Pak Lah Resigns - MPs can determine new PM - Anwar? Najib? Kit Siang?

AND the King appoints him as the PM...

MALAYSIA is certainly more humane - Rights and Justice are important for us

No politicians...including former human rights activist is today going to come out and champion for justice and human rights of foreign workers - after all they are not the ones who will be voting in the MPs and the ADUNs.

The Foreign Worker First Out policy and practice is unconstitutional, as it goes against Article 8 of the Federal Constitution that guarantees equality. Article 8 (1) provides that 'All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law...'. There is no exception that would allow the discrimination of a person based on whether he is a citizen or a foreigner. There is also no exception that allows for discrimination in the area of employment in the private sector. [see earlier posting:-Malaysia's 'Foreign Workers First Out'(FWFO) principle is unconstitutional and discriminatory. See also the Joint Media Statement that have been endorsed by Malaysia's ‘Foreign Workers First Out’(FWFO) Policy is UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY and UNCONSTITUTIONAL

So, who will champion the rights of these 'foreigners' - more so during this period of financial crisis.

'My political future will be jeopardized if I am seen taking the side of foreign workers at this period...." says the Malaysian politician.

Some may even say - let us just propose an amendment of our Federal Constitution to allow discrimination based on whether one is a citizen or not, especially in matters of private employment.

We should be concern about all human persons - irrespective of their nationality, ethnicity, religion, gender, etc.

Our concern must be Equal Rights and Justice for All..

An official guideline for employers to retrench their foreign workers ahead of local employees has alarmed civil society groups who fear that migrant workers could be sent home with inadequate compensation.
MCPX
Worries about retrenchment and unemployment have been mounting as Malaysia sinks into a recession, its export-oriented economy taking a hit from a slump in global consumer demand.

In the last quarter of 2008, the economy grew by just 0.1 percent and many fear the economy will shrink this year despite a huge RM60 billion government stimulus package.

In January, exports dropped by 28 percent and the number of workers employed by the manufacturing sector fell by nine percent against the previous year.

bangladesh foreign workers migrants 030108Thousands have been retrenched in the last few months. Labour Department statistics for the month of January alone show 4,325 workers retrenched of which 2,153 were local and 2,172 foreign. These of course are only reported figures.

The steady rate of retrenchments has worried the government, which has announced a principle of foreign workers first out (FWFO), meaning that employers should lay off foreign workers before they retrench locals.

Even the country's trade union movement is worried about the influx of migrant workers at a time when retrenchments are rising.

The issue came under the spotlight when the Bangladeshi labour counsellor said that 70,000 workers from that South Asian country with approved visas would be arriving soon to take up jobs in the plantation, construction and services sectors.

A senior official of the Malaysian Trades Union Congress pointed out that thousands of Bangladeshi workers were experiencing employment uncertainty. He said it would be better to revoke their visas while they were still in their country, instead of landing here and becoming unemployed or under-employed.

Don't exaggerate it

But activists point out that many of the foreign workers in Malaysia have paid small fortunes to agents in their home countries to work in Malaysia. Most of the foreign workers in the country are from Indonesia, Bangladesh, India, Burma, Vietnam, Nepal and the Philippines.

They are lured here by foreign recruitment agents or representative of the more than 250 registered outsourcing countries operating in Malaysia.

If visas are cancelled, foreign workers are unlikely to obtain refunds from the agents. Bangladeshi and Indian workers, for instance, have to raise or borrow around RM8,000 to RM10,000 to pay for agents fees and other charges.

Employment agreements are usually for a period of three years while work permits have to be renewed annually.

foreign workers 201107But the government has reportedly slashed its work permit approvals by over 70 percent this year. It has also approved a proposal to double the foreign workers' levy imposed on employers to discourage the hiring of foreign workers.

Activists worry that employers could pass down these higher charges for their foreign workers to absorb. In the case of restaurant owners, this could reportedly amount to RM3,600 per worker. Employers could also be tempted to hire undocumented workers due to the higher levies.

Foreign workers usually have to work one or two years before they can recover what they incurred - or repay the loans they took - in their home countries. If they are sent back earlier, they could well find themselves in debt upon their return home.

Indonesia has expressed fears that some 100,000 of the two million Indonesian workers in Malaysia could be retrenched as companies here shed workers.

"This has not yet happened, so don't exaggerate it," outgoing Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was quoted as saying in the Indonesian media during a two-day visit to Indonesia this week. "And if it ever happens, it will not only happen to migrant workers but also to Malaysians."

It is inhumane

In a joint statement, fifty civil society groups from South and South-east Asia endorsed a statement, pointing out it would be a great injustice if Malaysian employers were allowed to prematurely terminate their foreign workers' employment agreements and send them back home.

Early termination of their employment agreements means they would usually end up in a worse condition than when they first entered into the agreement.

''This is a great injustice, and it is inhumane,'' said the statement. ''If there is going to be early termination of employment agreements which are for a minimum fixed period of employment, then the worker must be paid adequate compensation, at the very least basic wages for the remaining duration of their employment agreement.''

frozen seafood industry protest hong san workers penang 171208 01Paying migrant workers the usual termination benefits that Malaysian workers are entitled to - calculated based on the number of years in service - would not be fair either in view of the huge costs the foreign workers incurred in arriving in Malaysia.

Before they send back anybody, the employers should pay what they owe the workers, says Ruth Paul, the coordinator of the Foreign Workers Service Centre on mainland Penang.

''These workers don't have (statutory) retrenchment benefits; so if, say, they have a year remaining on their contract, the employers could pay their outstanding wages (for the remaining period) plus the cost of flight tickets,'' Paul said.

She mentioned a couple of cases in the city of Ipoh recently, where migrant workers were sent back home without their wages because the company was shutting down.

Paul also fears that some employers might just shut down their factories without adequately compensating their migrant workers, leaving them in a lurch.

In the past, she had encountered cases where the employers, who had held on to their workers' passports, suddenly disappeared and could not be contacted. ''The only thing I tell them is to make a police report and contact their embassy.''

Human rights lawyer and blogger Charles Hector suggests that a new policy could be adopted: if a migrant worker has been retrenched, and if he or she has worked less than three years in Malaysia, a new amended work permit could be given to allow the worker to be employed in another sector that needs workers.

''They may be non-citizens, but they are workers and human beings, and they need to be treated as such,'' he wrote in his blog. ''The government needs to develop just policies and principles.'' -IPS - Malaysiakini, 27/3/2009, Gov't to bosses: Hit foreign workers first






Thursday, March 26, 2009

Why so bothered about UMNO? It may no longer be the party of the majority of Malays in Malaysia.

Why are we so bothered about UMNO - United Malay National Organisation, a Malay ethnic political party?

After all, we all know that most Malays today do not anymore support UMNO - their support is now with PAS, PKR , DAP...

How many members do UMNO have really? Some say, once you register as an UMNO member, you never lose your membership even if you do not pay your annual subscription. Even when you die, your name remains in the rolls. How many members? I know UMNO tries to give the impression that it has millions of members - but really how many active members who pay their own annual subscription does UMNO have.

By the way is UMNO members all Muslims? Are they all Malays?

Well, how many Malays are there in Malaysia? Interesting question but very difficult to get the real answer.

Nowadays, they talk only about Bumiputras - and that is Malays plus the natives of Sabah plus the natives of Sarawak plus maybe the 'Indian Muslims of Penang' plus maybe the Eurasian community plus maybe the Thai Malaysians.. well, I really do not know & sadly my quest for this information gave me no definite answers

Number of Malays in Malaysia - CIA World Factbook says
'Malay 50.4%, Chinese 23.7%, indigenous 11%, Indian 7.1%, others 7.8% (2004 est.) - CIA World Factbook
And with regard to religion, the CIA World factbook says:-
Muslim 60.4%, Buddhist 19.2%, Christian 9.1%, Hindu 6.3%, Confucianism, Taoism, other traditional Chinese religions 2.6%, other or unknown 1.5%, none 0.8% (2000 census) - CIA World Factbook, Malaysia
A government census in the year 2005 - showed that with regard to religions practiced in the country (Information obtained from a paper/presentation by Yayasan Kepimpinan & Strategi Malaysia)
Muslim - 57%
Buddhism - 23%
Christianity - 11%
Hinduism - 6%
Confucianism/Taoism/Traditional Religions/Others - 3%
Note that about 50.10% of Other than Malay Bumiputras are Christians, and only about 36.3% are Muslim.

Now since GE2008, UMNO has clearly lost the support of the majority of Malays to PAS and PKR and other Opposition parties, and so what percentage of Malays do UMNO represent today? 10%? 20%? 40%? maybe just 50%...

And are the Malays in UMNO true supporters of UMNO, its principles and values - or are they there just for the 'contracts' and the other 'opportunities/gifts/benefits'?

UMNO tries to propagate the myth that it is VERY strong ...and has the support of the MAJORITY of Malays...etc but really, it is time for us to wake up and realize that UMNO is just another political party - an archaic party - that is about to lie dawn and die, and may be no more come the next General Elections. Media and the 'past' is used extensively to propagate the idea that UMNO is bigger and more important than it really is...That is why...the UMNO assembly is made to be 'BIG' news - and not just the main assembly but also those of its various wings - Wanita (Women), Pemuda(Youth-Male), Puteri (Younger Women) ....and what happened to the Putera (the younger men).

UMNO is really so old-fashioned - and is not only divided by gender - but also age group.

Only the older men will be leaders of the Party.

So, no woman will be President of UMNO - and no woman will be PM of Malaysia. (Hello - we have already had women Prime Ministers/Presidents in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Philippines, - but not in Malaysia)

Which is the party that has the support of the majority of Malays? PAS...PKR....or UMNO. What do you think?



Is Khairy's victory an indication that majority in UMNO do not support Najib?

The defeat of Mukriz Mahathir was unexpected...but is it also indicative of the support that Mohd Najib Razak really has within UMNO...

I do not believe that Khairy won because the members support him - but rather he won because many of the members are not at all happy with Mohd Najib Razak, and they showed it by supporting Khairy

Of course the money/gifts that members received could have also been a factor - and this is based on the fact that UMNO Disciplinary committee did find Khairy 'GUILTY'...Mukriz was maybe just trying to rely on his goodness, his values, his personality, etc...
What are some of the political implications of Khairy’s improbable victory?

The first and most immediate implication has to do with Najib’s power and influence within Umno. If the ‘signal’ which was sent by Najib was not sufficient to ‘kill off’ Khairy’s chances to become the next Umno Youth chief, one has to wonder if the suspension of Mohd Ali Rustam is sufficient to pave the way for Muhyiddin Yassin to win the post of Umno deputy president and hence become the next DPM of Malaysia. We will find out within the next 12 hours. - Malaysiakini, 26/3/2009,
How Khairy managed the impossible

With regard to nominations, it was Mukriz Mahathir (74 nominations), Mohd Khir Toyo (62 nominations) and Khairy Jamaluddin (53 nominations)

But when it came to votes, it was the reverse with Mukriz Mahathir receiving the least of the votes, Khairy Jamaluddin polled 304 votes, enough to defeat Khir (252 votes) and Mukhriz (232 votes).

Mukriz Mahathir can reasonably be said to have been the choice of Mohd Najib Razak, and his cousin Hishammuddin Hussein, and in fact his allegiance started being expressed immediately after GE2008...

Umno Youth executive committee member Mukhriz Mahathir said he would support deputy president Najib Abdul Razak should he challenge Abdullah Ahmad Badawi for the party presidency. - Malaysiakini, 1/4/2008, Mukhriz backs Najib as PM

Asked if he would contest the Umno Youth chief’s post, he said this will depend on the decision of incumbent Hishammuddin Hussein.

mahathir khir toyo kmu forum 010408 03“I’ve not made that decision. Of course, I will have to consult my boss (Hishammuddin) to decide and announce where he will go next.”
- Malaysiakini, 1/4/2008, Mukhriz backs Najib as PM

MCPX






His father and former Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad, who also now seems to be supporting Najib for PM (but conditionally)...and Muhyiddin for DPM (or Deputy President of UMNO).
“One of the candidates couldn’t write in English, he couldn’t speak English and therefore (that was why) he did something wrong in Australia because he could not understand English. My choice is Muhyiddin (Yassin).”
MCPX

Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad made this sarcasm-tinged comments when asked by a reporter as to who he would endorse as the country’s new number 2 once current Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak takes over the country....“It is important for the party that only personalities 'beyond any suspicion' are in the leadership line-up,” he told a press conference at his KLCC office this afternoon.

He said it was important for Umno members to be aware that Umno had already been rejected by the people as reflected in its poor performance in the March 8 polls last year.

mahathir and rais yatim pc 190309 01“This is caused by widespread public perception that Umno is a party with corrupt leadership and therefore members must elect clean leaders in the party polls next week in order to restore public confidence in the party.

And for him, Muhd Taib who was arrested in 1996 for carrying RM2.4 million in cash in Australia is seen by the public as a corrupt person and does not exactly fit in the ‘clean character’ bill. - Malaysiakini, 19/3/2009, Dr M endorses Muhyiddin as DPM

Mahathir certainly does not support the corrupt - and let us not forget that Khairy was found 'guilty' - but was left off with only a warning.
Meanwhile, former Selangor Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo has been cleared of all charges while Umno Youth deputy chief Khairy Jamaluddin was found guilty but let off with a warning. - New Straits Times, 17/3/2009, Ali Rustam out of Umno deputy presidency contest
Was the victory of Khairy by reason of support for Khairy - or was it really an anti-Najib vote? I believe that it is the latter, taking into consideration the nominations that he got.

The 'barring' of Mohd Ali Rustam from contesting could have been the 'last straw' for some - a 'wake-up call' that Najib must be stopped, and if not 'checked'.

Muhyiddin Yassin, who many believed was the preferred choice of Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to be the Deputy Prime Minister - was certainly not a 'close pal' of Mohd Najib Razak.

But alas, he fumbled when he chose not to offer himself as a candidate for Presidency - settled to contest for just the Deputy Presidency.

Over the months, Muhyiddin has become more and more pathetic. He has been voicing support for Najib - and how he will make a good deputy...how he will be a 'loyal follower' and support Najib's plans and vision....blah..blah. Unfortunately, Najib has been silent..

Some say that Muhyiddin should have been like Shahrizat Abdul Jalil - and gone ahead to offer himself as the Presidential candidate. But then, not a single division nominated him as a candidate for the post of President...

At the end of the day, in fact the members nominated 2 other persons to challenge him for even the post of Deputy President - and then the Disciplinary Committee, a few days before election, barred one from contesting.

So, his only challenge is now with a former Selangor MB, who, I believe, is also not an MP now, i.e. Mohd Taib (a.k.a. Mike Tyson..)...

Mohd Ali Rustam (now 'barred' from contesting) would have been a more real challenge.

If Muhyiddin wins with a small majority or if he loses, then maybe it would be an indication of what people feel about Najib (or maybe the race to monitor is the vice-president race, where Najib's cousin and former UMNO Youth Chief, Hishammuddin Hussein Onn, is contesting..)

Muhyiddin had his window of opportunity...and he missed it. Now, even if he wins, his political future may not be that bright...
"I have been able to cooperate all along. He knows my style, and I know his. If you ask me, we can cooperate. People say we complement each other.

"No leaders are alike but the ambition and spirit of struggle are one. That's important.

"The direction is the same, the vision is the same, the style different. Datuk Seri Najib is more handsome than I, he is younger than I. It's okay. There is no problem."
Muhyiddin said he hoped all quarters would not be influenced by claims that it was unnecessary for Umno to elect someone outspoken to a post below that of party president.

"Of importance is establishing a strong leadership.

"Two strong heads are better than one strong head or 10 heads because the problems we face are complex.

"It is one thing to handle political problems, it is another to handle economic problems.

"The economic issue will grow into a critical issue and this can add or reduce our political dividends.

"If we are not prudent in managing the economy we will lose out in terms of dividends. We need wisdom in managing the economy in a recession."

When asked what he would do first if he wins the Umno deputy president contest, Muhyiddin said: "Firstly, God willing if I win, I have to realise that I am not the No. 1, that I am the No. 2.

"I have always looked back at the history of Umno, that when you are No. 2 you have to act as the No. 2 and not as the No. 1. That is dangerous.

"When people ask about the vision, I say it is not my vision. It is his vision which I am aiding. The No. 2 man must behave as the No. 2, feel as the No. 2 and speak as the No. 2. I am very aware of the fact and I have to behave."

He said party members and the people would observe whether the No. 1 and No. 2 could work together and there would be various pro and contra views and, as such if elected, he would play any role given to him by the No. 1.- New Straits Times, 21/3/2009,
Muhyiddin: Najib and I complement each other

At the end of the day, we will really never know whether the membership of UMNO supports Najib Razak as President - as they never had the chance to vote for him, and the present quota system when it comes to nominations makes it very unlikely for there to be any contest when it comes to the post of President of UMNO...

The victory of Khairy indicates that Najib, who may have had support before, has now lost it...

Hence, again I reiterate that when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi resigns - it will be important to really be sure that Mohd Najib Razak has the support of the majority in the Dewan Rakyat. We cannot assume that all BN MPs...or all UMNO MPs want Najib to be the next Prime Minister.

Maybe, the majority in BN (UMNO) may want Khairy Jamaluddin to be the next Prime Minister...or maybe even Muhyiddin to be the Prime Minister...

Then, Najib, as President of UMNO, can really focus his attention in re-building UMNO and its image in preparation for the next General Elections which may end the UMNO led-BN rule of Malaysia.


Wednesday, March 25, 2009

RM10,629-99 expended to come to Malaysia - an early return is just not right ...or just

Well, I would like to share with you an Editorial in the Daily Star dated 25/3/2009, which carried the joint statement of 59 organisations entitled ' Malaysia's ‘Foreign Workers First Out’(FWFO) Policy is UNJUST, DISCRIMINATORY and UNCONSTITUTIONAL

It says that "...A worker from Bangladesh spends no less than Tk. 2,00,000 on making his trip to Kuala Lumpur...", and this is about RM10,629-99. So, is it fair to suddenly terminate the worker's contract after 6 months, 1 year or even 2 years. Remember that most workers come over to Malaysia based on an agreement (and a representation) that they will be working for at least 3 years (and that further extension will most likely be there for another 2 or more years..).

A worker in Bangladesh is not a fool to expend so much and risk so much just to come over to Malaysia to work for a short period...at a low pay.

Sadly, Malaysian employers (some of them, at least) even go and deduct all their other expenses from these worker's wages. Employer pays the levy to bring in a foreign worker - but alas some employer wrongly deduct this back from the worher's wages...

Live rates at 2009.03.25 10:20:09 UTC

200,000.00 BDT

=

10,629.99 MYR

Bangladesh Taka Malaysia Ringgits
1 BDT = 0.0531500 MYR 1 MYR = 18.8147 BDT



Editorial

In defence of migrant workers

Time to mull global regulatory mechanism is here

FIFTY civil society groups straddling South and South-east Asia have come to the defence of hapless migrant workers, especially in Malaysia. The move reflects the urgency of the situation in which these workers, a very big group of which comes from Bangladesh, find themselves at present. The points which the civil society groups have raised certainly make much sense since they are aimed at cushioning the pain that migrant workers go through when they are informed suddenly that they cannot work any more. In these past many weeks and months, thousands of workers from Bangladesh have had to bear the brunt of the arbitrary moves made by the Malaysian authorities. The latest has been the cancellation of work visas issued to 55,000 Bangladeshi workers even before they could travel to Kuala Lumpur. Making matters worse was the plight of hundreds of others stranded at the airport in the Malaysian capital because they were not being allowed entry.

We agree with the contents of the joint statement issued by the civil society groups, and commend them for it, because they mirror the severe difficulties retrenched workers will face if they are not given adequate compensation by the firms that hire them in Malaysia. The bigger point here is that a contract is a binding agreement that must not be violated with impunity. But when hiring companies in Malaysia take it upon themselves to terminate contracts and tell migrant workers to go home after they have worked for two of the three years they were supposed to, they do not take workers' problems into consideration. That is a wrong approach, for it smacks of exploitation of the helpless and a certain cavalier attitude in dealing with poverty-stricken foreign labourers. While we acknowledge the difficulties that employers may be facing, we also think that when they dismiss workers, they should ensure that these workers go back home with adequate compensation in hand. A worker from Bangladesh spends no less than Tk. 2,00,000 on making his trip to Kuala Lumpur. He has invested a huge amount of money; he is in debt and expects to repay it through his remittances. It is these issues that must be looked into. Migrant workers must not be treated in the same way as local workers when it comes to compensating the affected.

Finally, we believe the time has now come for some serious new thinking into the dilemma all too often faced by migrant workers in different countries. The possibility of an international regulatory mechanism geared to a defence of the interests of the employers and especially of the migrant workers coming into operation ought to be looked into. The arbitrariness of governments needs to be replaced by a system that will be more humane where the rights of such workers are the issue. Perhaps the ILO could be involved. - Daily Star, 25/3/2009, EDITORIAL - In defence of migrant workers, Time to mull global regulatory mechanism is here

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Don't call them 'illegal migrants' - call them undocumented migrants.

Illegal migrants - this is not right for there can be no human being that is illegal.

The correct...progressive phrase to use is 'undocumented migrants' - i.e. referring to migrants whose entry and presence in Malaysia have not been documented in accordance to law. Or maybe their documents that permitted stay is no longer valid. Or maybe, they just do not have any documents...

Their entry...or maybe their continued presence may be against the law - illegal, BUT that cannot make them illegal migrants. They could be migrants that have entered the country illegally, or who have stayed here illegally - but they should never be called illegal migrants.

Let us STOP calling them illegal migrants or immigrants - used the more dignified term, i.e. documented or undocumented migrants/immigrants. The other term used sometimes by the UN and ASEAN is 'irregular migrants', but I still prefer the term 'undocumented migrants'.

The Immigration Department detained 216,373 illegal immigrants from 2005 to 2008, of which 191,583 have been deported.

The largest group of illegals were from Indonesia with 104,026, followed by the Philippines with 32,687, Myanmar with 18,986, Bangladesh with 14,433 and Thailand with 9,481.

“This staggering number shows that there is no effective system in place to send back illegal workers,” said Klang member of parliament Charles Santiago, in a reaction to the answer provided to his written question in parliament on how many illegals were deported.

The DAP lawmaker said that the high incidence of illegal foreign workers will depress wages and called for an “effective exit strategy” to be made available to them.

The incidence of illegal foreigners has been a source of concern, especially in Sabah where it is claimed by opposition politicians that they now outnumber local residents.

The use of foreign labour has also come under criticism for increasing competition with locals for jobs as well as undermining wages as foreign workers are seen as more willing to accept lower pay.

There are an estimated two million foreign workers in Malaysia. The home ministry has set a target of reducing this number to 1.5 million by 2015.

In a recent report, Home Ministry deputy secretary-general Datuk Raja Azahar Raja Abdul Manap said that an average of 250 permits for foreign workers were approved daily for the first two months of this year down drastically from 800 last year.

In an effort to reduce dependency on foreign workers, the government announced in the mini-budget recently that it would double the levy on foreign workers, a move that was widely criticised by some employers who claim that they are unable to find locals who are willing to work in dirty or low paying jobs. - Malaysian Insider, 23/3/2009, Over 200,000 illegals nabbed in past 3 years

Interesting figures, but there must be some more questions asked:-

a) How did these migrants become 'undocumented migrants'?
- Did they come into the country validly with an entry visa, and then were cheated by their agent/employer who did not get them the 'promised' work permit [Pas Lawatan(Kerja Sementara) - PLKS ]
- Did they have a work permit [Pas Lawatan(Kerja Sementara) - PLKS ], and it expired and was not renewed?
- Were they arrested by reason of not having their original passports with them and no employer/agent came forward with the proper pasport and visa - and as such they were classified 'undocumented' and deported?
- Are they really asylum seekers and refugees, which Malaysia may not want to openly recognize as they come from some ASEAN member country, and Malaysia really do not not want to jeopardize its relationship with that ASEAN country?

b) How many of these migrants were charged in court - and how many were not? Why the differential treatment?

c) How many of these migrants were 'whipped' before they were deported?

d) How many months did they spend in Detention Centres before being deported?

e) Why 191,583 out of 216,373 were deported? What happened to the rest?

f) Were the employers of these 216,373 undocumented migrants identified and action taken against these employers? How many of these employers were charged? [Unfortunately, very few employers are investigated...let alone charged, and as such they will again employ undocumented workers for very very low wages...Many arrested undocumented migrants gets 'whipped' before being deported - and errant employers are not even investigated...let alone charged...or tried...or convicted?]

g) How much money was expended for the detention and deportation? Who paid for this? Was the money recovered from those who employed these migrants? Or from those who brought these migrants into Malaysia?

Maybe, it is time we change our way of doing things...

Rather than arresting, detaining...and deporting, maybe we should just document and register them as migrant workers. As they are already in the country, it will save the potential employer much money as the employer will not be required to pay the incoming airfare and cost, etc..

Maybe, we should also allow potential workers to enter the country with social visit passes, and seek employment here. If they find employment within 30 days, then their employer must immediately register them as workers, and the said worker will be issued a work visa. If they cannot find work within 30 days, then they will have to leave ...or maybe apply to extend their visa. This is done in neighbouring Thailand...

For asylum seekers and refugees, who really escaped their home country 'illegally' and are many a times here in Malaysia without any documentations, maybe compassionate caring Malaysia can accord them special 'asylum seeker or refugee status' and allow them to also work in Malaysia. [There may be more than 500,000 'asylum seekers and refugees' in Malaysia coming mainly from Burma, Southern Thailand, Southern Philippines, Aceh (maybe no more or less), ...]

No human being is illegal - and it is wrong to call any human beings...including migrants illegal.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Is Najib's desperation the cause of the suspension without reason of Harakah and SK?


The suspension of PAS's Harakah and PKR's Keadilan for 3 months - with no reasons given is really so undemocratic..

The Home Ministry has suspended the organs of two opposition parties - PAS' Harakah and PKR's Suara Keadilan - for three months, effective immediately.

MCPX
With the suspension, both newspapers will not be able to publish until the end of June, missing out on a number of crucial political events including the three by-elections on April 7. - Malaysiakini, 23/3/2009, Harakah, Suara Keadilan banned 3 months

I saw the letter from Home Ministry that was sent to Wan Azizah, President of PKR, which was dated 23/3/2009, and I see that there was no reasons given for the suspension. [The letter could be seen in Malaysiakini]

It certainly looks like UMNO-BN is really worried - and wants to cut communications between Opposition parties and the people.

The mainstream print-media generally take a pro-UMNO-BN stance, and to get the perspective of the Opposition parties, many usually read the Harakah, and recently also the Suara Keadilan.

What about the internet media? Well, the truth is that many still rely on print media for their information....and the suspension will cause a 'black-out' to the truth (or to the PAS and PKR's version of the truth...) for 3 months, and it will affect the coming by-elections, and more importantly the possible change in the Premiership of Malaysia.

The Prime Ministership cannot be handed over like a baton in a relay race...but that seems to be the way it is going to happen, possibly some time in April. See my earlier posting :-
Golden Opportunity if Pak Lah Resigns - MPs can determine new PM - Anwar? Najib? Kit Siang?

And, remember that the Prime Minister need not be the President of UMNO. Someone else can be the Prime Minister.

There are many, even within UMNO, who do not want Mohd Najib Razak to become the next Prime Minister...

There may be MPs in BN who do not want Mohd Najib Razak to be the PM...

Hence, there should never be the presumption that since BN numbers outnumber the Opposition MPs, that all the BN MPs want Mohd Najib Razak as the next Prime Minister - or that they want the current PM to resign.

Recently, with the preventing of one of the 3 Deputy President candidate contesting, namely one Mohd Ali Rustam, who did manage to get 46 UMNO Division nominations, one wonders about the support that Mohd Najib Razak will still be having. Note that this man had more votes than even Muhyiddin in 2004...
During the 2004 Umno election, Mohd Ali won one of the three vice-president seats when he secured the second highest vote with 1,329 votes behind the former Federal Territories Minister, Tan Sri Isa Abdul Samad (1,507). The other winner was Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin (then Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister) who secured 1,234 votes.

Last November, Mohd Ali received 46 nominations to contest the Umno Deputy President's post, together with Muhyiddin (now International Trade and Industry Ministry), and Rural and Regional Development Minister Tan Sri Muhammad Muhd Taib. -
Bernama, 17/3/2009, Profile Of Mohd Ali Rustam

Would this barring of some candidates, all seemingly not allied with Najib, have an impact on the support of the UMNO MPs in parliament when it comes to choosing the next Prime Minister. See my earlier posting,'Corruption' and Discrimination in UMNO - Has the report to MACC against Ali Rustam (and KJ) been made?

There can be NO assumptions this time around that all BN MPs want Mohd Najib Razak to be the Prime Minister. The determination of whether Mohd Najib Razak has the requisite support of the majority can and should only be made after Abdullah actually resigns.

But will Parliament still be sitting? Or like Perak, will the Yang Di-Pertuan Agung call in MPs, one after the other, to determine who they support to be the next PM. Will Mohd Najib Razak be there in the room when this is done - or will he like Nizar be kept out? If he is on the room, some MPs may be too scared...and may just lie saying that they support Mohd Najib Razak...

Maybe, Mohd Najib Razak should just remain Deputy Prime Minister for some time to come...

The suspending of the alternative print media - the Harakah and the Suara Keadilan, would surely deprive the Malaysian people of views and opinions about very important things that will be happening in Malaysia in the next few months...

The non-giving of reasons is also very unjust and wrong - surely some reasons must be given.

Many persons employed by these publications directly and indirectly, and those who earn a living by distributing/selling, will lose their jobs and/or earnings - and this again is not at all right.

I urge the Malaysian Government, the Home Minister, to immediately revoke this suspension of permits in the name of democracy and justice.

Workers on fixed-term contracts:- HR Ministry fails to provide JUST calculation of benefits when they are retrenched

Today, many employers are using NEW methods to employ workers ...and unfortunately the government has not put in place laws that will protect these workers.

Short-term contracts - Now employers enter into short-term employment contracts with their employees. This could be for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year or maybe even 2 years. There may be promises of renewal but alas, there is no guarantee of renewal - and hence, job security is not there, and workers find it more and more difficult to get new jobs as they get older and gain more experience. What many employers do is not renew these short term contracts after 1 year...or 2 years. Maybe later on, after a month or 2 has passed, they may sometimes hire the same worker back for maybe a different position for another short term.

Using Labour Supply Companies - Again, on record, the employer is the Labour Supply Company (usually some 2 ringgit company with no fixed assets...) - and not the company that uses these workers. Wages are paid by the labour suppliers to the workers - and not by the Company to the workers. These workers also cannot join the unions of the Company, if they exist. Labour supply companies are usually not industry specific - hence workers there also have difficulty even being part of any national union. Employment in Labour Supply companies are also not at all 'permanent' - and even hints of wanting to unionize may invite termination. Further, the fact that workers in Labour Supply companies are placed in different locations for different periods makes 'organizing' workers even more difficult.

Outsourcing Work To Other Smaller Companies - Even Banks in Malaysia have started doing this - and check vetting, internet/phone bankings, etc have been all outsourced. But alas, workers in these 'smaller companies' that do these outsourcing work
are not members of of Union - the NUBE, the National Union of Bank Employees. Bank Employees have been retrenched when banks decide to 'outsource' parts of its work - and with the emphasis on automation (ATMs, etc), internet banking, phone banking - we would be seeing another 30% of bank employees being retrenched in the near future, and this would happen whether global crisis came or did not..

The current provisions in law, as provided for EMPLOYMENT (TERMINATION AND LAY-OFF BENEFITS) REGULATIONS 1980 really will not do any justice for workers who are under these short-term fixed contracts, etc..

To be entitled to termination and lay-off benefits, one must have been working for at least 1 year (12 months),

an employer shall be liable to pay termination or lay-off benefits payment calculated in accordance with regulation 6 to an employee who has been employed under a continuous contract of service for a period of not less than twelve months ending with the relevant date if —

(a) the contract of service of the employee is terminated; or

(b) the employee is laid-off within the meaning of regulation 5.

(2) For the purpose of this regulation a continuous contract of service for a period of not less than twelve months shall include two or more periods of employment which are not less than twelve months in the aggregate if the intervening period or periods between one period of employment and another does not in the aggregate exceed thirty days.- Regulation 3, EMPLOYMENT (TERMINATION AND LAY-OFF BENEFITS) REGULATIONS 1980

and the calculation of termination and lay-off benefits is based on the number of years that one has been working for...
...the amount of termination or lay-off benefits payment to which an employee is entitled in any case shall not be less than —

(a) ten days’ wages for every year of employment under a continuous contract of service with the employer if he has been employed by that employer for a period of less than two years; or

(b) fifteen days’ wages for every year of employment under a continuous contract of service with the employer if he has been employed by that employer for two years or more but less than five years; or

(c) twenty days’ wages for every year of employment under a continuous contract of service with the employer if he has been employed by that employer for five years or more,

and pro-rata as respect an incomplete year, calculated to the nearest month. - Regulation 6(1) EMPLOYMENT (TERMINATION AND LAY-OFF BENEFITS) REGULATIONS 1980

Under the current law, those who have been employed for less than a year will NOT get any termination or lay-off benefits.

When workers were being employed as permanent employees, and generally will be employed until they resign - the 'termination or lay-off benefits' would have been just and fair.

But it certainly will NOT be fair to those being employed under fixed-term employment contracts, and it is proposed that for justice to be done to these workers, the calculation of what they should be paid should be 70% of their basic wages multiply the number of remaining months in their fixed-term contract/agreement.

Why 70%, and not 100%? Because 30% would be roughly the amount of money that they may spend for their food, etc - and this is early termination. [Maybe, they should be given 100% ...]

Some employers may try to terminate the contract alleging worker's breach, etc - and maybe there must be a provision in law, that the employer should be required to deposit the amount due with a HR Ministry Fund pending resolution of any dispute initiated by the worker, etc...

The Human Resource Minister must amend the Employment Act to include this manner of calculation, which shall be the minimum amount that employers must pay their fixed-term contract employees/workers.

The HR Minister must also discourage the practice of using Labour Supply Agencies - maybe these Labour Supply Groups may need to be banned. There must be direct employment of workers by the Company.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody ...Kugan Ananthan,...

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody , passed on 14th March 2009 at the 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur

The Malaysian Bar,

recalling Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:
Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

recalling Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
noting that on 8 July 2008, the Ministry Of Home Affairs reported in Parliament that, based on the Prison Department’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 1535 persons died in prisons, rehabilitation centres and immigration detention camps;

noting that based on the Royal Malaysia Police’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 85 persons died in police custody, while 600 persons died in remand centres for drug addicts;

noting that the victims of custodial deaths are from various ethnic groups;

distressed that on 20 January 2009, Kugan Ananthan, a 22-year old reportedly detained for investigations into car thefts died in police custody;

shocked that the relevant authorities, at first instance, appeared to certify that Kugan Ananthan’s death was not caused by any person criminally concerned;

noting
that the nature of Kugan Ananthan’s death once again raises concerns regarding the treatment of detainees in the custody of law enforcement personnel and the interrogation methods used on detainees;

deeply concerned that custodial deaths continue to occur and erode public confidence in and perception of the Royal Malaysia Police;

1. Strongly calls upon all law enforcement agencies and their personnel to respect, protect and promote the rights of detainees.


2. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately sign and ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, and implement it as domestic legislation.


3. Strongly calls upon the Royal Malaysia Police, the Attorney-General and the Judiciary to cause all custodial deaths to be investigated by inquiries conducted pursuant to Chapter XXXII of the Criminal Procedure Code, and ensuring that all inquiries are conducted expeditiously, transparently and in a meaningful manner.


4. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately advise the King to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate the issue of custodial deaths including, but not limited to, Kugan Ananthan’s case.


5. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately establish the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission and implement all the recommendations of the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police.


The motion was unanimously carried.

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody ...Kugan Ananthan,...

Malaysian Bar Resolution on deaths in custody , passed on 14th March 2009 at the 63rd Annual General Meeting of the Malaysian Bar held at the Grand Ballroom, Legend Hotel, Kuala Lumpur

The Malaysian Bar,

recalling Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:
Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

recalling Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, which states that:

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
noting that on 8 July 2008, the Ministry Of Home Affairs reported in Parliament that, based on the Prison Department’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 1535 persons died in prisons, rehabilitation centres and immigration detention camps;

noting that based on the Royal Malaysia Police’s statistics from 2003 to 2007, 85 persons died in police custody, while 600 persons died in remand centres for drug addicts;

noting that the victims of custodial deaths are from various ethnic groups;

distressed that on 20 January 2009, Kugan Ananthan, a 22-year old reportedly detained for investigations into car thefts died in police custody;

shocked that the relevant authorities, at first instance, appeared to certify that Kugan Ananthan’s death was not caused by any person criminally concerned;

noting
that the nature of Kugan Ananthan’s death once again raises concerns regarding the treatment of detainees in the custody of law enforcement personnel and the interrogation methods used on detainees;

deeply concerned that custodial deaths continue to occur and erode public confidence in and perception of the Royal Malaysia Police;

1. Strongly calls upon all law enforcement agencies and their personnel to respect, protect and promote the rights of detainees.


2. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately sign and ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, and implement it as domestic legislation.
3. Strongly calls upon the Royal Malaysia Police, the Attorney-General and the Judiciary to cause all custodial deaths to be investigated by inquiries conducted pursuant to Chapter XXXII of the Criminal Procedure Code, and ensuring that all inquiries are conducted expeditiously, transparently and in a meaningful manner.
4. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately advise the King to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate the issue of custodial deaths including, but not limited to, Kugan Ananthan’s case.


5. Strongly calls upon the Government to immediately establish the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission and implement all the recommendations of the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysia Police.


The motion was unanimously carried.