Press Release | Reinstate Moratorium on Use of Repressive Laws as First Step Towards Repeal
The
Malaysian Bar is very troubled at the statement by the Minister of Home
Affairs, Tan Sri Dato’ Hj Muhyiddin Hj Mohd Yassin, that the Cabinet
has decided to withdraw the moratorium that it had imposed on the use of
the Sedition Act 1948, Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia
Act 1998, Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (“SOSMA”),
Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015 (“POTA”) and Prevention of Crime Act
1959 (“POCA”), which he attributed to the incidents of disorderly
conduct at the Sri Maha Mariamman Temple in Subang Jaya last week.
It
is extremely disappointing that the Government has backpedalled so
quickly, particularly when there are other laws to adequately deal with
the situation. A mere three weeks ago, the same Minister had said that a
draft relating to the review of the preventive detention laws was at
the final stage and that he hoped the review would be tabled at the
current or next sitting of Parliament.
By
withdrawing the moratorium, the Pakatan Harapan Government is reneging
on its commitment — made in “Promise 27” of its election manifesto for
the 14th General Election — to abolish laws that it had itself described
as “oppressive” and “tyrannical”. The Government’s pledge would ring
hollow, were it to resort to the same draconian laws that it had
denounced the previous administration for invoking.
Such
action will invariably give rise to an irresistible inference in the
public’s mind, that the Government did not make its election promises —
which formed the basis for the rakyat’s votes for a change of government
during the 14th General Election — in good faith.
The
statement by the Minister of Communications and Multimedia, Gobind
Singh Deo, that the moratorium “is limited to incidents that threaten
national security, public order, and race relations” is ironic, in that
the previous Government had often justified its use of those repressive
laws on the same basis.
The
Malaysian Bar has through the years repeatedly called for the urgent
repeal of the aforementioned laws, as each one is unconstitutional
and/or an affront to the principles of natural justice and the rule of
law. These laws have been abused in the past and, while they remain on
the statute book, the potential for misuse remains.
Anyone
who is proven to be guilty of unlawful behaviour in respect of the
incident relating to the relocation of the temple must not go
unpunished. The wrongdoers must be identified and prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law. What is necessary is for the police to
conduct a thorough investigation of the alleged criminal acts with
competence, dedication and resolve, without abrogating the rule of law,
which must never be violated for the sake of expediency. If there are
gaps in laws to effectively deal with security concerns, existing laws
can be amended or appropriate new laws enacted, without recourse to the
repressive laws that the Government had promised to abolish..
The
Malaysian Bar calls upon the Government to immediately reinstate the
moratorium imposed on those laws, and to work to repeal them without
delay. We are confident that the Government can rise to the challenges
of governing the nation in line with its commitment to respect
fundamental liberties, principles of natural justice, and the rule of
law.
George Varughese
President
Malaysian Bar
5 December 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment