Choosing Ministers - time for a re-evaluation of how Ministers are chosen, noting that individual Ministers have a lot of power, as contained in Acts of Parliament, which can be exercised without consent of PM or Cabinet, thus, the need to ENSURE that only principled, ethical, suitable and qualified persons are made Ministers and/or Deputy Ministers - Time to introduce laws like PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT, i.e. PM can nominate, but Parliament will vet and approve, before the King appoints.
At present, it is the PM that picks and causes appointment - but it seems, that he alone, picks MAYBE on the basis of whether one is a holder of party position, or by reason of 'deals' with coalition partners, OR .... - END RESULT - RISK of an unsuitable person becoming a Minister, vested with power that even the PM or Cabinet cannot control. Should we also enact a law, that ensures the need for Cabinet approval before a Minister can exercise his/her power?
Was Rafizi and Nik Nazmi even qualified or suitable to be appointed Ministers - or were they appointed simply because they were Deputy President and Vice President of PKR?
Note being a leader of a political party does not translate into suitability or qualification to be a Minister... Some good political leaders of parties make bad members of the Cabinet.. Malaysians should demand ONLY Suitable and Qualified persons be made Ministers.
Rafizi and Nik Nazmi, after they lost party elections - they resigned as Ministers - was it a VOTE of loss of confidence in PM Anwar Ibrahim? Or was it just proof of their 'unsuitability' to be even have been appointed as Ministers.
Worse, Rafizi and Nik Nazmi resigned, and went on leave stating their resignation will be after their leave is over? Should Ministers who wanted to resign be responsible enough in completing their work, and preparing 'hand-over' documents so that their replacements could take over easily. Again, is this a sign of irresponsibility and unsuitableness as Ministers.
Rafizi confirmed that his resignation will take effect on June 17 and that he will be on annual leave until then.... “I have submitted my resignation letter to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, effective July 4, 2025. I will be on leave starting tomorrow until July 3, 2025,” he [Nik Nazmi] said.
You are a Minister of Malaysia, and losing party elections should not mean you forsake your duties/responsibilities as Ministers. If you quit the party in protest, or even stayed in the party but opted to declare loss of confidence in Anwar as PM, it may be OK(as what the BERSATU MPs did), but suddenly abandoning your Ministerial responsibilities is a totally different thing - it is a BETRAYAL of the people of Malaysia.
One must note that some of Anwar's Ministers have been found wanting - thus, the time has come for vetting and approval by Parliament - to ensure Malaysia has suitable and qualified Ministers and Deputy Ministers (Art. 43A(2)(2) Deputy Ministers shall assist Ministers in the discharge of their duties and functions, and for such purpose shall have all the powers of Ministers.)
It must be noted that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's choice of Ministers and Deputy Ministers have raised some concern. Whilst previous Prime Ministers; Muhyiddin and Ismail Sabri, chose not to appoint anyone who was facing investigations and trials as Ministers or Deputy Ministers, Anwar, on the other hand, appointed some of them in the 'court cluster' as Ministers/Deputy Ministers.
One may argue that Anwar had NO CHOICE because that may have been a 'condition' for BN joining PH, so that the coalition government could be formed, and Anwar could finally be the Prime Minister... Alternatively, PH would not be able to form the government...
Many were then supportive of PH because of its REFORM agenda and promises - but today, as REFORMS never really came, people's perception, and possibility support, for PH may have declined.
Now, the fact that you lost PKR elections, and even GE15 elections is not a reason why you are not suitable to be appointed as Minister - the appointment of Saifuddin Nasution as Home Minister is case in point.
But, if you are facing a charge or trial for a criminal offence makes one unsuitable for being appointed Minister, or remaining as Minister..The case in point is Zahid Hamidi, who was appointed Deputy Prime Minister.
The point is made clear in the Federal Constitution itself, whereby Article 33A,(1) Where the Yang di-Pertuan Agong is charged with an offence under any law in the Special Court established under Part XV he shall cease to exercise the functions of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.
Naturally, the same principle ought to apply to the Prime Minister, Minister or Deputy Minister - i.e. if they are charged with any offence and facing trial, they should never be appointed as Minister.
Zahid Hamidi, when PM Anwar made him Minister, and Deputy Prime Minister was still facing trial.
It was only on 4/9/2023, that Zahid Hamidi was granted a DNAA (Discharge Not Amounting To An Acquittal). No problem about appointing Zahid as Minister after he was discharged - meaning facing no more charge, but the appointment when he was charged and facing a trial was wrong - same standards that apply to the King should apply to any of the King appointed Ministers.
That is WHY we need to amend the LAWS requiring APPROVAL of Parliament for all persons that Prime Minister Anwar wants to be appointed as Ministers or Deputy Ministers.
Time for PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT for Malaysia to ensure that only SUITABLE and QUALIFIED persons are made Ministers and Deputy Ministers in Malaysia.
Such an ACT that requires Parliamentary Approval should also apply to the Public Prosecutor, and all heads of Law Enforcement - police, MACC, ...
A NEEDED REFORM....
After Rafizi, Nik Nazmi resigns as minister following PKR election loss
KUALA LUMPUR, May 28 — Following Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli’s resignation as economy minister, Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad has today announced his decision to step down as natural resources and environmental sustainability minister after failing to retain his PKR vice-presidency.
In a statement today, Nik Nazmi said his resignation will take effect on July 4, with him going on leave beginning tomorrow.
“I have submitted my resignation letter to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, effective July 4, 2025. I will be on leave starting tomorrow until July 3, 2025,” he said.
Nik Nazmi reflected on his tenure, highlighting key reforms achieved under his leadership, including amendments to the Environmental Quality Act 1974, increased transparency in environmental impact assessments, and significant progress in biodiversity protection.
“Malaysia became one of the earliest nations to submit the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plan, which received recognition from United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres,” he noted.
He also cited accomplishments such as the passing of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act and the introduction of the much-needed Tariff Setting Mechanism in the water sector.
Nik Nazmi acknowledged that his Cabinet appointment had been influenced by his position as a PKR vice-president, which he lost in the party’s recent elections.
“Given that I was unable to retain the position, I have decided to resign as minister,” he said.
He expressed gratitude to civil servants, his office team, and stakeholders for their support, adding that he looks forward to resuming his responsibilities as Setiawangsa MP.
Quoting late British MP Tony Benn, Nik Nazmi said, “I am leaving the Cabinet to give more time to politics and public service.”
Rafizi, who lost his bid for re-election as PKR deputy president to Nurul Izzah Anwar, announced his resignation as economy minister earlier today.
The Pandan MP had previously stated his intention to step down if he failed to secure the deputy presidency, citing the importance of Cabinet members holding party leadership positions.
The resignations of Rafizi and Nik Nazmi signal significant shifts in the party’s representation within the federal administration and raise questions about the Cabinet’s future composition. - Malay Mail, 28/5/2025
NO. 33 OF 2011
PUBLIC APPOINTMENTS (PARLIAMENTARY APPROVAL) ACT
[Date of assent: 11th November, 2011.]
[Date of commencement: 14th November, 2011.]
An Act of the Parliament to provide for procedures for parliamentary approval of constitutional and statutory appointments and for connected purposes
1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the Public Appointments (Parliamentary Approval) Act, 2011.
2. Interpretation
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires—
“appointing authority” means any person who, under the Constitution or any other law, is required to make an appointment for which the approval of Parliament is required;
“appointment” includes any re-appointment to the same body, whether or not in the same capacity;
“candidate” means a person who has been proposed or nominated for appointment to a public office;
“Clerk” means the Clerk of the relevant House of Parliament; and “Committee” means the relevant committee of Parliament or such other Committee as the Speaker may, for good reasons, direct.
3. Exercise of powers of appointment
An appointment under the Constitution or any other law for which the approval of Parliament is required shall not be made unless the appointment is approved or deemed to have been approved by Parliament in accordance with this Act.
4. Notification of vetting requirements
Any advertisement inviting applications for nomination for appointment to an office to which this Act applies shall indicate that candidates so nominated shall be required to appear before a committee of Parliament for vetting
No comments:
Post a Comment