In Malaysia, it is the MINISTERS/Prime Minister that 'PICKS' and appoints DIRECTORS, and also approves CEOs, COOs, CFOs, ... and even decisions on what the entity does. There is UNCERTAINTY as to whether CABINET APPROVAL is needed - or even just the PRIME MINISTER's OK???
Follow the Charles Hector channel on WhatsApp:
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb6UokfB4hdNugYmph1B
The problem is that sometimes persons CHOSEN by these Ministers to be DIRECTORS/ CEO and upper management may be UNQUALIFIED. If the correct qualified persons are appointed, the likelihood of LOSSES, and even crimes by these appointees reasonably will END???
Some may have been appointed because of 'political party affiliations' or 'friendship' > thus HIGHER RISK that ULTIMATELY create LOSSES to Malaysia and the Malaysian people.
We are here talking about appointments in Government Agencies/Bodies, Government OWNED companies or Government CONTROLLED entities (GLCs,GLICs,etc - FELDA, Tabung Haji, -- Now, we see many from these government owned/controlled companies being CHARGED in Court.
Also ODD is how long ago these CRIMES were committed, and the other question is WHY were the crimes not detected earlier, and why was action not taken earlier...???
Should we ENACT LAWS making the PM/Ministers that appointed, that FAILED to monitor to ensure no LOSSES, crimes, wrong decisions that led to LOSSES be also made CRIMINALLY liable for their failures? In Malaysia, it is the DECISION of Malaysians whether such laws are enacted because we are a DEMOCRACY and the people decide on the LAWS...So, SPEAK UP PEOPLE...
SHOCKING when it is the former FELDA DG, Tabung Haji Chairman, former Minister, ...Remember, the Minister/Prime Minister is entrusted with the RESPONSIBILITY for these entities(including all its subsidiary companies) - NO LIABILITY or LIABILITY on Ministers RESPONSIBLE - Criminal liability or just CIVIL Liability, or BOTH.
As it is many MINISTERS may not even be qualified to be MINISTER of a particular MINISTRY - and probably unqualified to chose and appoint DIRECTORS, CEOs and Upper Management >
Should we CHANGE this - and require appointments by an INDEPENDENT qualified body. Now, in Malaysia, JUDGES are no longer chosen by the PM as he/she pleases, we have the JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS Commission who will decide on who is QUALIFIED - and the PM can only chose JUDGES based on persons recommended by the Judicial Appointments Commission(JAC) - this was a REFORM since 2009. So should we have a similar appointments commission to identify QUALIFIED persons to be appointed DIRECTORS, CEO and upper management of government entities like FELDA, TABUNG HAJI, UITM Holdings,...and all government entities/companies and their subsidiaries?
Faizoull Ahmad, A former director-general (DG) of the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) was charged at the Sessions Court here today with deceiving the authority’s board of directors in connection with a power of attorney used to transfer the ownership of 16 parcels of its land at Jalan Semarak in 2014. - Malay Mail, 30/9/2026
The former chief executive officer of Felda Investment Corporation Sdn Bhd (FIC), Zaid Abdul Jalil, faced two charges at the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court today for deceiving the FIC board of directors. - Malaysiakini, 29/9/2026
Former Tabung Haji (TH) chairman Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim has pleaded not guilty to charges of using his position to secure the chairmanship of a company with a RM690,000 (S$216,000) annual salary 12 years ago. - Straits Times, 9/9/2026
Former Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) chief operating officer Datuk Adi Azuan Abdul Ghani pleaded not guilty at the Sessions Court here today to three counts of graft involving over RM302,000 in home renovation works. - Malay Mail, 24/9/2026
A total of five people have been charged since the disclosure of the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report into the management and operations of Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) in late July.former Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Religious Affairs) Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom was the fifth person to be charged today at the Sessions Court here, where he pleading not guilty to three charges involving RM860,308,770.51 in TH funds. Apart from Jamil Khir, those charged were former TH chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim, former THP Bina Sdn Bhd Security and Safety Manager Nasahruddin Ahmad, and former TH Properties Sdn Bhd deputy general manager Tengku Kamarolhisham Tengku Kamaruddin, who was also a former deputy general manager of THP Bina Sdn Bhd. Also charged was Alam Maritim Resources Bhd group managing director and group chief executive officer Datuk Azmi Ahmad. - Scoop, 14/9/2026
A former senior executive is set to be charged in court in connection with an investigation by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) into alleged abuses of power that resulted in approximately RM42 million in losses for UiTM Holdings Sdn Bhd - Malay Mail, 29/9/2026
Thus, should NOT the Minister/Prime Minister be CRIMINALLY LIABLE for these crimes/LOSSES that happens in entities under the government/MINISTRY?
Should not the MINISTER be HELD RESPONSIBLE not ensuring that these GOVERNMENT Bodies under the DIRECT responsibility of the Minister/PM fails?
The CRIME or LIABILITY is based on not whether the Minister/PM took money - but because he/she FAILED in the duty to ensure the success of companies/entities under the said MINISTER's jurisdiction.
Making Ministers CRIMINALLY Liable or liable - certainly would act as a DETERRENT - that will ensure that Ministers act responsibly and WILL always monitor all entities/companies under their jurisdiction to ENSURE they do WELL(not suffer losses), and no crimes/wrongdoings happens that will cause MALAYSIANS to lose monies?
Why have the all the DIRECTORS in these entities yet to be charged in COURT > did they not fail in their duties? NO PENALTY? NO PUNISHMENT for failure in their responsibility?
Company directors are personally liable for corporate losses if those losses result directly from a breach of their legal, fiduciary, or statutory duties.
Do the politically appointed DIRECTORS even know their duties/responsibilities?
SO, if the MINISTER/PM appoints the UNQUALIFIED - should he/she not be personally LIABLE for the losses the company suffers by reason of his/her NEGLIGENCE? YES, they should be. REMEMBER that in Government entities > the MINISTER acts on behalf of all the people of Malaysia...
In Malaysia, some Ministers/PM appoint people from their own political party or 'friends' - who sometimes do not even understand their responsibilities as company DIRECTORS - many of these appointed DIRECTORS end up being mere 'seat warmers' who happily take home their MONTHLY and other allowances.. and DO NOT ensure that the running of the Company is WELL... Do they even have experience in the said BUSINESS - or worse, even understand their RESPONSIBILITIES as Directors of Companies?
NO ONE appoints a LAWYER who is NOT legally qualified, or a DOCTOR who is unqualified > so NEGLIGENT appointment of DIRECTORS, CEOs, etc - who are not the BEST qualified, or sometimes have NO KNOWLEDGE of EXPERTISE in the particular business may result LOSSES and the company failing.
1MDB could not have happened if the DIRECTORS did their JOB > how did they allow NAJIB to do all this wrongs and worse take 'monies' himself? Should they also not be CRIMINALLY liable?
After 1MDB, Malaysia should have LEARNED - and needed changes and reforms of how we do things should have happened > What changes/reforms have PM Anwar Ibrahim's government done >> or is the POSITION of this government not to do anything, and allow the way we did things remain the SAME? WHY?
Why did the Company Directors of FELDA, Tabung Haji and other GLCs not come forward first and report these CRIMES or these wrongs - or did they inform the SHAREHOLDERS, the people of Malaysia here represented by the PM/MINISTER ONLY - who knew BUT did not take action at all or just 'covered it up'? OR was also reaping personal benefits from the wrongdoing...
WHAT REFORMS NEEDED?
The problem starts with the MINISTERS themselves - the fault lies with the PRIME MINISTER who chooses who will be Minister and for what Ministry > BUT now some MINISTERS may not even be QUALIFIED to be a Minister of a particular Ministry - THUS, seriously we should CONSIDER the need for PARLIAMENT APPROVAL before candidates chosen by the PM are appointed MINISTERS.
If there is Parliamentary Approval, Parliament will thoroughly determine a particular nominee of the PM has the requisite qualification to be appointed MINISTER - if yes, KING appoints.
In many nations , the president(and for Malaysia, the PM) must nominate ministers, but they cannot officially assume office until they undergo vetting and receive approval from Parliament or a legislative committee. Similarly, in the United States, presidential cabinet nominees require confirmation by the Senate before appointment.
If we get the RIGHT 'qualified' MINISTERS, then less chances of agencies/companies under that Minister suffering LOSSES - or the occurrence of crimes by Directors/Upper Management happening.
PRIOR Parliamentary approval of MINISTERS, if done, may deal with the 'ROOT CAUSE' of losses and crimes in entities and GLCs.
NEXT, for the appointment of DIRECTORS, CEOs and upper management - there must again be an INDEPENDENT Vetting procedure > this will REDUCE bad Directors/Officers - reducing the possibility of LOSSES and even CRIMES. Maybe PARLIAMENT or some select committee could do this.
ANOTHER problem in Malaysia is the FAILURE OF PARLIAMENT - Parliament is suppose to be a check and balance - to prevent ABUSES, LOSSES, etc ... So, there should maybe be a PARLIAMENTARY Committee that is dedicated to MONITORING FELDA, Tabung Haji,..including the many subsidiary companies > Maybe best for SEVERAL Parliamentary Committees monitoring selected entities and their subsidiaries. This commitee should have the power to get all relevant documents/facts and can conduct PUBLIC inquiries in carrying out their duty...
PARLIAMENT Failed To find out about 1MDB - and allowed all wrong doings to go on so long - resulting in BILLIONS of losses.
It is most sad, that even after 1MDB, the government including PM Anwar's current government FAILED to do the needful to PREVENT a REPEAT of the similar..
One identified problem was the fact that Najib was both Prime Minister and Finance Minister, whereby 1MDB fell under the Finance Minister ... so, it was a GOOD proposal that the Prime Minister should never also be the Finance Minister - but sadly Anwar is now both Prime Minister and Finance Minister (also like Najib, he may be in charge of 1MDB, Khazanah, ...) >> So after Anwar is no more Prime Minister, we may again see similar criminal charges against Anwar, as the crimes Najib has been convicted of/
Should we enact a LAW that Directors of Tabung Haji, FELDA, and all its subsidiaries is answerable to Malaysians, and then Parliamentarians can ask questions and get answers to be able to carry out their 'check and balance' of the Executive who now 'can keep secrets' - for these companies/entities currently only answer to MINISTERS, as the representative of Government/the Malaysian people.
Every year, the AUDITOR GENERAL reveals wrongdoings/failures > but has the Government and the Malaysian Enforcement Agency followed up where those responsible have been charged ..and REFORMS that will prevent similar crimes or actions/ommissions that led to these LOSSES?
Former Felda DG charged with cheating board over Jalan Semarak land transfer
- A former director-general of the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda), Datuk Faizoull Ahmad, has been charged with deceiving Felda's board of directors regarding a power of attorney related to the transfer of 16 parcels of land at Jalan Semarak in 2014.
- By allegedly concealing the details of the power of attorney, Faizoull is accused of inducing the board to approve the transfer of ownership to Synergy Promenade companies, when they otherwise might not have done so.
- He pleaded not guilty to the charges under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which could result in a prison sentence and a fine if convicted.
KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 30 — A former director-general (DG) of the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) was charged at the Sessions Court here today with deceiving the authority’s board of directors in connection with a power of attorney used to transfer the ownership of 16 parcels of its land at Jalan Semarak in 2014.
Datuk Faizoull Ahmad, 66, however, pleaded not guilty after the charge was read out before Judge Suzana Hussin.
Faizoull, in his capacity as Felda DG, is accused of deceiving the board by concealing a power of attorney dated June 3, 2014, granted Synergy Promenade Sdn Bhd authority to transfer ownership of the 16 parcels of land involved in the proposed Felda Lot Development Project at Jalan Semarak.
The act induced the board of directors to agree to the power of attorney, resulting in the transfer of ownership of the said Felda land to Synergy Promenade KLVC Sdn Bhd and Synergy Promenade Sdn Bhd, when the Board would not have done so had it not been deceived.
The offence is alleged to have been committed at the Board Meeting Room, Level 50, Menara Felda, Platinum Park, Persiaran KLCC here on Sept 2, 2014.
He was charged under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which carries a prison sentence of between one and 10 years and caning, as well as a fine, upon conviction.
Deputy public prosecutor N. Joy Jothi offered bail of RM100,000 with one surety, considering the seriousness of the offence.
“We also request additional conditions that the accused’s passport be surrendered to the court and that he report to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) office once a month until the case is concluded,” she said.
Faizoull’s lawyer Datuk Sukri Mohamed sought a lower bail of around RM30,000 on the grounds that his client is the main breadwinner and has four children still in school.
“Previously, his passport was impounded for four years, from December 2018 to September 2022, in relation to two other charges. Throughout this period there was no evidence to show that he attempted to flee or failed to cooperate,” he said, adding that his client had been remanded for five days beginning Sept 6.
Judge Suzana allowed the accused to be released on bail of RM70,000 with one surety, subject to the additional conditions requested by the prosecution.
The court then fixed Nov 6 for the next mention of the case.
The MACC has opened six new investigation papers into allegations of embezzlement, abuse of power and corruption involving Felda and its subsidiary, Felda Investment Corporation Sdn Bhd (FIC).
The probe into the Kuala Lumpur Vertical City (KLVC) project forms part of seven investigation papers, including one older probe.
The investigations focus on the acquisition and investment of assets by Felda and FIC between 2010 and 2020, which are suspected to contain elements of corruption, embezzlement and abuse of power.
Yesterday, former FIC chief executive officer Mohd Zaid Abdul Jalil pleaded not guilty at the Sessions Court here to two charges of deceiving the FIC board of directors in connection with the appointment of a company for a proposed commercial development project and the market value of 24 parcels of Felda land, 12 years ago. — Bernama, Malay Mail, 30/9/2026
Ex-chair of Malaysian pilgrimage fund charged with abuse of position, influencing RM193.5m investment
KUALA LUMPUR - Former Tabung Haji (TH) chairman Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim has pleaded not guilty to charges of using his position to secure the chairmanship of a company with a RM690,000 (S$216,000) annual salary 12 years ago.
Clad in purple police lock-up garb, Azeez, 60, claimed trial after the charge was read out before Sessions judge Azura Alwi on Sept 9.
“I understand (the charge), it is not true at all... I request a trial,” he said.
Azeez is alleged to have used his position as chairman of TH, which is the country’s Muslim pilgrimage fund, at that time for bribery, namely to obtain the position of chairman of Putrajaya Perdana Berhad with a remuneration of RM690,000 per year as well as a luxury car and permanent driver.
Azeez allegedly instructed Ismee Ismail, the chief executive officer of the TH Board at the time, to propose the accused as the TH representative in Putrajaya Perdana; and to convince TH board members during a meeting to approve a proposal to invest up to RM193.5 million (up to 30 per cent of the existing issued share capital) in the company, in which he had an interest.
The offence was allegedly committed at the Tabung Haji Building board meeting room on Jalan Tun Razak on Aug 25, 2014 under Section 23(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009, punishable under Section 24(1).
It provides for a maximum of 20 years’ jail and a fine of not less than five times the amount or value of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher, upon conviction.
Deputy public prosecutor Datuk Ahmad Akram Gharib previously applied for bail of RM1 million with two local sureties and several additional conditions.
However, judge Azura allowed Azeez, the former Baling member of parliament, bail of RM450,000 with two Malaysian sureties.
The court also ordered him to report to the Kuala Lumpur MACC office every three months until the case is resolved.
Earlier, Azeez was also remanded for two days to assist in investigations into the hibah fraud case. - Straits Times, 9/9/2026
US charges three Malaysian state telecoms officials for multimillion-dollar fraud

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter.
Reporting by Rozanna Latiff; Editing by David Stanway - Reuters, 20/5/2026



No comments:
Post a Comment