Thursday, September 03, 2020

Minister Mohd Khairuddin can be charged for even attempted murder when others put at risk of Covid-19, which kills?

Media Statement – 3/9/2020

No Special Treatment For Minister Khairuddin Aman To Protect Public Perception Of Malaysia’s Administration Of Justice

Investigate for attempted murder and other crimes, not simply crimes under the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988

MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) would like to state that Minister Datuk Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali, who put at risk so many Malaysians including our Members of Parliament, who many could have been infected by Covid-19, a disease that can cause death, ought to be investigated not just under Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988, but also for attempted murder and other offences under the Penal Code and other laws.

Covid-19 – Highly infectious and caused death of about 128 in Malaysia and 867.000 worldwide

Covid-19, is a highly infectious disease that has already infected about 9,360 in Malaysia, and about 26 million worldwide. In Malaysia, 128 have died as a result of Covid, whilst worldwide, the death toll is about 867,362.

Everyone, especially a current Minister, knows that Covid-19 is imminently dangerous with the risk of causing death, or causing others to be infected by this life threatening disease.

As such, Malaysia, and countries worldwide, have put in place strict measures in place to prevent risk of infection and death, including restrictions on movement and also quarantine requirements. Effective 24 July 2020, all passengers travelling into Malaysia are now required to undergo 14-day mandatory quarantine at dedicated quarantine centres upon arrival. Previously, there was the option of self-quarantine.

The imposition of the 14 day quarantine requirement, is because we know that a single Covid test is considered insufficient. On his return, a nasopharyngeal swab sample to screen for Covid-19 was taken from him which turned out negative does not mean that he can avoid quarantine, or be Covid-19 free.

One of the high risk categories are those that come  to Malaysia from other countries, whereby Turkey is  now the country with the 18th highest number of Covid-19 infections worldwide, where there is a recorded about 271,515 infections and 6,462 deaths, whereby yesterday there were about 1,596 new infections, and 45 deaths.

King, Queen and Prime Minister also had to undergo 14-day Quarantine

Even Malaysia’s King, Queen and members of the royal family had to undergo a 14-day self-quarantine at Istana Negara after several of the palace staff were tested positive for Covid-19 two weeks ago.(New Straits Times, 9/4/2020). On 22 May, Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin was also placed under a 14-day quarantine at home, after attending a meeting with a later detected Covid-19 patient.(Malaysiakini, 20/5/2020).

Plantation and Commodities Minister Khairuddin travelled to Turkey allegedly on July 3, returned to Malaysia on July 7, and was in Parliament on July 13, just six days later.

Questions arise as to why he was even allowed to travel to Turkey, and also the possibility of crimes committed by public servants and the government, when he was not placed on a 14-day quarantine on his return. Even if he was allowed to freely move, any reasonable person would had known that they ought to have placed themselves at the very least under self-quarantine for 14 days.

Even after Minister Khairuddin’s presence in Parliament, when he should have been under quarantine, was discovered, the fact that he was not immediately detained and placed under quarantine also raises questions. In fact all Members of Parliament and staff, present on that day, should have at the very least been subjected to quarantine, and Parliament thereafter disinfected.

Are the police investigating the offence of attempted murder?

It was just reported that the police is yet to complete their investigation into the Mohd Khairuddin’s case. Bukit Aman CID deputy director DCP Mior Faridalathrash Wahid was quoted saying, “At the moment, the investigation paper is still open and we will send it to the Attorney General’s Chambers in the near future,”(Malay Mail, 2/9/2020).

Minister Khairuddin’s investigation should not be simply confined to crimes under the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988, but must also include crimes under the Panal Code and other laws, including attempted murder and crimes of putting people at risk of being infected by life threatening diseases.

Even if the result of Khairuddin’s actions has allegedly infected no one, he can still be charged for the crime of attempted murder, attempted culpable homicide and other crimes.

One of the Malaysia’s Penal Code definition of murder is that ‘if the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death, or such injury as aforesaid.’(Section 300(d)), and for the lesser offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, it requires only that any actions/omissions was done ‘with the knowledge that he is likely by such act to cause death, commits the offence of culpable homicide.’(section 299).

The current sentence for attempted murder is ‘…imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine…’(section 307) and for attempted culpable homicide, it is ‘imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine or with both’(section 308). If hurt, which reasonably would include being infected by Covid-19, then the sentence will be even higher.

Negligent act likely to spread infection of any disease dangerous to life (Section 269) is another Penal Code offence. ‘Whoever unlawfully or negligently does any act which is, and which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months or with fine or with both’. There is also the offence of Malignant act likely to spread infection of any disease dangerous to life (Section 270) which provides for a higher sentence.

Equality and equal protection of the law – same treatment even if Minister

How the Khairuddin’s case is investigated and prosecuted will have a significant impact on the perception of the administration of justice in Malaysia, noting also that the Federal Constitution guarantees’ all persons equality and everyone is ‘entitled to the equal protection of the law.’  Special treatment of a sitting Minister and Members of Parliament will be wrong.

Many in Malaysia that violated laws relating to Covid-19 have been arrested, detained and even convicted by court. We recall an individual in the Sivagangga cluster for failure to remain under home quarantine, was recently convicted and sentenced to five months’ jail and fined RM12,000.(Malay Mail, 13/8/2020).

As such, MADPET urges that no special treatment be accorded to Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali, simply because he a member of a political party that is now forms the government.

Charge in Court, and not simply offer compound

MADPET also condemns the action of offering a compound of RM1,000 to this Member of Parliament, when he should be charged in court for his crime.(New Straits Times, 22/8/2020) A offer and payment of compound, which is an administrative action, generally precludes him from later being charged for the same offence in court. A compound in not a fine, for a fine is a sentenced imposed on a person convicted in court.

Compounds should justly never be offered to persons who breached quarantine and/or did something that knowingly putting others at imminent risk of a life-taking infectious disease, death or injury. Employers who breach laws that caused death or injury to workers should also never be compounded – they should be charged, tried and if convicted, sentenced by court.

The practice of ‘special treatment’ of Prime Ministers, Ministers and government politicians in the past in Malaysia have resulted in too many crimes going unpunished in the past for too long. The past Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister and now past Finance Minister was charged only after they were not in government, and this is wrong for speedy investigation and prosecution is needed irrespective of whether they are Ministers or politicians of political parties, part of government. Delayed prosecution can result in further crimes committed by the same person.

No one is above the law, and that includes the Prime Minister and Ministers. What happens to Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali and all others that allowed these crimes to happen and/or continue matter, and will impact the perception of administration of justice in Malaysia.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

Police expect to finalise probe on quarantine-breaking minister soon

Bukit Aman CID deputy director DCP Mior Faridalathrash Wahid says the police have not completed their investigation into Datuk Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali for violating the mandatory Covid-19 quarantine. — Bernama pic
Bukit Aman CID deputy director DCP Mior Faridalathrash Wahid says the police have not completed their investigation into Datuk Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali for violating the mandatory Covid-19 quarantine. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 2 — The police have not completed their investigation into Datuk Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali for violating the mandatory Covid-19 quarantine but should do so soon, said Bukit Aman CID deputy director DCP Mior Faridalathrash Wahid.

Mior said investigators still needed to verify some matters regarding the plantation industries and commodities minister’s failure to perform the compulsory 14-day quarantine after returning from Turkey in July.

"At the moment, the investigation paper is still open and we will send it to the Attorney General’s Chambers in the near future,” he was quoted as saying by Astro Awani today.

The police recorded Khairuddin’s statement late last month.

On August 13, Khairuddin’s predecessor, Seputeh MP Teresa Kok, pointed out that the minister was already back in Parliament on July 13 despite only returning to Malaysia six days prior.

Despite being fined RM1,000 over the incident, Khairuddin insisted he did nothing wrong by failing to observe the mandatory 14-day quarantine and described the matter as a procedural error.

Under the National Security Council’s SOP, all returnees are tested on arrival and those with negative results must then serve out their 14-day quarantine while those testing positive are sent to a hospital for further treatment.

A breach of this order is punishable under the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988 by up to two years’ imprisonment, a fine, or both upon conviction. - Malay Mail, 2/9/2020

 

Muhyiddin under quarantine after officer contracts Covid-19

Published
Modified 22 May 2020, 7:26 pm

CORONAVIRUS | Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin has been placed under a 14-day quarantine at home beginning today, after attending a meeting with a Covid-19 patient on Wednesday.

His office said Muhyiddin was tested for Covid-19 this morning and the results came back negative but he is required to undergo quarantine under Section 15 of the Prevention of Infectious Diseases Act 1988.

The Prime Minister’s Office said Muhyiddin was chairing a post-cabinet meeting at the office in Putrajaya that day. One of the officers present have since tested positive for Covid-19.

“All attendees at the meeting have also been ordered to undergo testing and quarantine at their respective homes for 14 days beginning today.

“For information, all meetings at the PMO practice social distancing and high levels of hygiene at all times,” the PMO said in a statement today.

Previously, Muhyiddin's predecessor Dr Mahathir Mohamad was placed under mandatory quarantine at home as well after taking a picture with Bandar Kuching MP Kelvin Yii who later tested positive for the disease.

Mahathir had tested negative for the disease and was released from quarantine when the quarantine period ended.

Malaysia has reported 78 new Covid-19 cases today, for a total of 7,137 cases since the beginning of the outbreak. One death was also reported today, involving a 65-year old man while multiple chronic diseases.

Of the latest cases, 53 were local transmissions while the remainder were imported cases.

Most of the cases (25) involve Pakistani nationals detained at an immigration detention facility in Bukit Jalil while another 11 are linked to the Sungai Lui cluster in Semenyih. - Malaysiakini, 22/5/2020

 

King, Queen complete self-quarantine, now free of Covid-19

KUALA LUMPUR: Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah and Raja Permaisuri Agong Tunku Hajah Azizah Aminah Maimunah Iskandariah have completed the 14-day self quarantine and were confirmed free from Covid-19.

Comptroller of the Royal Household for Istana Negara Datuk Ahmad Fadil Shamsuddin said Their Majesties and members of the royal family were in good health and had expressed appreciation to the people for their prayers and concerns over the safety and wellbeing of the royal family.

Their Majesties and the members of the royal family have observed self-quarantine at Istana Negara as advised by the Ministry of Health (MOH) after several of the palace staff were tested positive for Covid-19 two weeks ago.

“Following the positive cases, all 116 Istana Negara staff were instructed by the MOH to undergo Covid-19 screening and to observe 14-day self-quarantine, which ended today,” he said in a statement here today.


Ahmad Fadil said Al-Sultan Abdullah, who was concerned about the current Covid-19 situation, repeated his advice for the people to comply to the instructions given by the MOH and other authorities, especially in regard to self-quarantine and Movement Control Order (MCO).

“His Majesty also expressed his disappointment over the fact that there are certain people who selfishly refuse to comply with the MCO, hence causing an increase in the number of positive Covid-19 cases and red zones.

“Let’s play our roles together by staying at home to help flatten the curve of Covid-19 infection. If there is a need to go out, then wear a face mask and observe social distancing,” he said.

Ahmad Fadil said Al-Sultan Abdullah also conveyed his gratitude and appreciation to the MOH, Royal Malaysia Police and the Malaysian Armed Forces personnel, especially those in the frontline, for their sacrifices and perseverance in discharging their duties.

The high percentage of patients who have fully recovered from Covid-19 and the low mortality rate in Malaysia proved that the government has some of the best pandemic-handling methods in the world, he said.

“Their Majesties also extended their condolences to the families of all Covid-19 victims and hoped that their families will remain strong in facing this difficult time.

“Their Majesties also expressed hope that all Muslims in the country will continue praying for the grace and mercy of Allah so that Malaysia will always be protected and that the pandemic will end soon,” he added. – Bernama, New Straits Times, 9/4/2020

Ismail Sabri: Sivagangga cluster ‘Patient Zero’ jailed five months and fined

Senior Minister (Security Cluster) Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob speaking to the media in Kuala Lumpur August 3, 2020. — Bernama pic
Senior Minister (Security Cluster) Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob speaking to the media in Kuala Lumpur August 3, 2020. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 13 — The person responsible for the Sivagangga Covid-19 cluster in Kedah was sentenced to five months’ jail and fined RM12,000, Senior Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob revealed today.

The defence minister said the authorities viewed the transgression seriously in a stern warning to the public amid growing concern over the emergence of new clusters as the government has eased restrictions.

“PDRM has taken action against an individual in the Sivagangga cluster for failure to remain under home quarantine,” the defence minister said during a press conference held in the Parliament building here.

“As we all know, this individual was supposed to be under home quarantine but instead went out to open his restaurant, and as a result, a few villages in Kedah and Perlis had to be locked down because of this individual’s failure to observe the regulation or standard operating procedure.”

The emergence of new clusters has prompted calls for stern punishment against those found breaching the Covid-19 mandatory quarantine.

Lawyers polled by Malay Mail said there are laws that can be used against the violators following public uproar over news that a permanent resident in Kedah behind the so-called Sivagangga cluster had ignored the quarantine order.

The index patient who broke his mandatory home quarantine has been identified as causing at least 40 others to be infected, some of which were third-generation cases.

Ismail Sabri said today the authorities have acted against 270 individuals for failing to remain under home quarantine.

From July 24 to August 12, 10,173 persons returned from abroad and have been placed under quarantine in 59 designated hotels and public training facilities throughout the country, the minister said.

From the total, 44 patients were sent for treatment while 2,332 had been discharged.- Malay Mail, 13/8/2020

Khairuddin slapped with RM1,000 fine for breaching quarantine

KUALA LUMPUR: Plantation Industries and Commodities Minister Datuk Dr Mohd Khairuddin Aman Razali was fined RM1,000 for failing to adhere to the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988 (Act 342), the Health Ministry said.

Khairuddin had been the centre of attention of late, after claims were made that he failed to observe the mandatory 14-day home quarantine after returning from a trip to Turkey on July 7.

In a statement today, the Health Ministry said the compound was issued to Dr Mohd Khairuddin on Aug 7 and that the minister has paid the amount.

"The Health Ministry issued a compound to Khairuddin after he was found to commit an offence under the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases (Measures within the Infected Local Areas) Regulations 2020, the Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases Act 1988 (Act 342).

"Khairuddin had returned from Turkey on July 7, in which, his nasopharyngeal swab sample was taken for the first time on the same day and tested negative.

"The second and third Covid-19 screening conducted on him also showed that he is negative of the virus.

"Since Khairuddin had failed to adhere to the regulations under Act 342, the authorised officer has issued a RM1,000 compound against him on Aug 7 and he has settled the compound," the statement read.

Dr Mohd Khairuddin, who is also Kuala Nerus Member of Parliament, was previously alleged to have violated his compulsory isolation period after returning from Turkey, having been present during Dewan Rakyat proceedings in the 14-day period after arriving in Malaysia.

Khairuddin's alleged quarantine violation became a hot topic in Dewan Rakyat and created a social media storm.

Seputeh MP Teresa Kok claimed that the minister had been on an unofficial visit to Turkey from July 3 to 7, but had attended Parliament only a week later.

Malaysians returning from abroad and other nationals permitted to enter the country must undergo a 14-day compulsory quarantine even if their first Covid-19 test upon arrival came up negative. - New Straits Times, 22/8/2020

 

Wednesday, September 02, 2020

Abolish minimum mandatory jail sentence for drunk driving, says NGO(FMT News)

Abolish minimum mandatory jail sentence for drunk driving, says NGO


sharethis sharing button
Madpet says rehabilitation is a better remedy for those charged with being under the influence of drugs or alcohol. (Bernama pic)

KUALA LUMPUR: A human rights NGO has called for judges to have full discretion when sentencing drunk driving cases following the recent amendments to toughen the punishments for such offences, including a minimum seven year jail term for causing death or injury.

Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (Madpet) said it would be a great injustice for someone on a drunk driving charge, who caused a minor injury, to be jailed for a minimum of seven years under amendments to the Road Transport Act 1987 (RTA).

“While Parliament may set the maximum sentence for particular crimes, it should never oust judicial power when it comes to sentencing by also imposing a mandatory minimum prison sentence.

“Judges and courts should be trusted to decide on the sentences after considering the relevant facts of each case,” the NGO said in a media statement today.

The Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020 was passed in the Dewan Rakyat on Aug 26 and will be tabled for the Senate’s approval before being sent to the King for royal assent to become the law.

This law will cover people who are under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

Drawing a comparison, Madpet said there are very serious crimes like corruption and abuse of power that affect all Malaysians badly, and as such, it may be unjust to mete out a harsh sentence on a first time drunk driving offender for causing injury to another.

“For corruption, a former prime minister was just sentenced six years for each of the four convictions, but if the RTA amendment is passed, a drunk driver that causes injury (not death) at the very least will be sentenced to seven years.

“Surely corruption and abuse of power by ministers and public servants requires a higher deterrent sentence,” Madpet said, adding that alcoholism and drug abuse should be viewed as a disease.

“Intoxication is a condition of having physical or mental control markedly diminished by the effects of alcohol or drugs, and is also now a recognised defence in criminal law.

“A period of rehabilitation may be a better remedy to alcohol and/or drug addicts, even when they have killed or injured another in a state of intoxication,” added the NGO.- FMT News, 1/9/2020

 

See full statement at:- 

Abolish Minimum Mandatory Prison Sentence for Drunk Driving Ensure one offence in Malaysian laws, not same offences under different laws carrying different penalties

Tuesday, September 01, 2020

Abolish Minimum Mandatory Prison Sentence for Drunk Driving Ensure one offence in Malaysian laws, not same offences under different laws carrying different penalties

Media  Statement – 1/9/2020

Abolish Minimum Mandatory Prison Sentence 

for Drunk Driving

Ensure one offence in Malaysian laws, not same offences under different

laws carrying different penalties

 

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) calls for the removal of mandatory minimum prison sentence in the Road Transport Act 1987(RTA), that imposes high sentences on drunk drivers that cause death or injury, and ask that sentencing discretion be left with the judges and courts. The mandatory minimum prison term being proposed by the Bill to amend the the RTA  is 10 years if death is caused, and 7 years if injury is caused.

It will be a great injustice for someone that caused a minor injury to be imprisoned for the minimum 7 years.

Parliament should leave sentencing discretion to the judges, who after hearing a particular case will determine an appropriate and just sentence taking into consideration all factors.

Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020

The Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020, was passed in the Dewan Rakyat on 26/8/2020, and it will now be tabled at the Senate for approval, and thereafter be sent to the King for royal assent, before it becomes law.

Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act will be amended to read; ‘…(1) Any person who, when driving a motor vehicle on  a  road  or  other  public  place—(a)  is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drug, to such an extent as to be incapable of having  proper  control  of  the  motor  vehicle;  or(b)  has  so  much  alcohol  in  his  body  that  the  proportion of it in his breath, blood or urine exceeds  the  prescribed  limit, and  causes  the  death  of  any  person  shall  be  guilty  of  an offence and shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment  for  a  term  of  not  less  than  ten  years  and not more than fifteen years…’ For causing injury to  any  person  ‘…with  imprisonment  for  a  term  of  not  less  than  seven  years  and  not  more  than  ten  years…’

This law will covers persons who are drunk with alcohol, and those who are on drugs.

There are very serious crimes like corruption and abuse of power that affect all Malaysians badly, and comparatively it may be unjust to sentence a first time drunk driving offender for causing injury to another. For corruption, a former Prime Minister was just sentenced 6 years, for each of the 4 conviction, but if the RTA amendment is passed, a drunk driver that causes injury not death, at the very least will be sentenced to 7 years. Surely corruption and abuse of power by Ministers and public servants requires a higher deterrent sentence.

Alcoholism and drug abuse is a disease. Intoxication is condition of having physical or mental control markedly diminished by the effects of alcohol or drugs, and is also now a recognized defence in criminal law. A period of rehabilitation may be a better remedy to alcohol and/or drug addicts, even when in a state of intoxication they kills or injures another.

No Minimum Mandatory Sentence – Leave Sentencing Discretion to Judges

Whilst Parliament may set the maximum sentence for particular crimes, it should never oust judicial power when it comes to sentencing by the imposition of a mandatory minimum prison sentence.

Judges and courts should be trusted to decide on the sentences, after considering relevant facts of each case.

Penal Code already have offences for causing death or Injury

Note that the Penal Code today provides for the offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, the sentence of ‘…with imprisonment for a term which may extend to thirty years…’ if there was intend to cause death, and ‘…imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years.. if the act is done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death, but without any intention to cause death…’. The other offence of causing death by negligence stipulates that anyone who ‘causes the death of any person, by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years’

For voluntarily causing hurt, the punishment is ‘…imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to two thousand ringgit or with both…’ Those who ‘…voluntarily causes grievous hurt, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine…’

Note that, in all these Penal Code offences of causing death and/or injury, Parliament rightfully does not set any mandatory minimum prison sentence but just the maximum penalty, leaving judges the discretion to impose a reasonable and just sentence.

The Penal Code already does cover offences of causing injury or death committed by persons under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and as such there is really no need to create or maintain such offences under the Road Transport Act.

Drunk Driver that killed – One charged for Murder, another for Road Traffic Offence?

On 1/6/2020, it was reported that an alleged drunk driver that caused another’s death was charged for murder, under section 302 of the Penal Code, that carries the mandatory death penalty(1/6/2020, New Straits Times).

Another report of a drunk driver that caused death was being investigated under section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act, and if he was charged and convicted would face a sentence of sentence of imprisonment of not less than 3 years and not more than 7 years.(The Rakyat Post/Malay Mail, 1/6/2020). There is no reasonable explanation as to why one case was considered murder, and another a lesser RTA offence. It will also be a violation of the Federal Constitution.

2 Acts with the Same Offence – Discrimination and no equality before the law?

Malaysia’s Federal Constitution in Article 8(1) states that ‘(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.’

As such there should be only one offence in one law, and not the same offence under different laws, which also raises the question why was one charged for an offence carrying the mandatory death penalty, and another under another Act which provides a lesser sentence.

The possibility of discrimination, abuse and corruption arises when there exist different laws for the same offence. For killing or causing injury, the Penal Code already provides for this offence, there is no need for Road Transport Act to have the same offence.

If need be, for a special offence committed whilst drunk or intoxicated, then maybe such offences should be inserted in the Penal Code.

Therefore MADPET calls on the government to immediately amend the Road Transport (Amendment) Bill 2020 and the Road Transport Act 1987 to:-

1) Remove the mandatory minimum sentences for all offences and restore sentencing discretion to our judges and courts;

2) Consider removing the offences of causing death and/or injury in the Road Transport Act, given the fact that today  any driver, under the influence of drugs or alcohol, who kills or injures another can already be charged under the Penal Code.

MADPET also urges the repeal of similar or same offences now found in different laws, to ensure compliance with our Federal Constitution, and this will dispel possibilities of discrimination and other abuses.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET (Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 


Alleged drunk driver in Kuantan crash charged with murder [NSTTV]

KUANTAN: A 41-year-old fish wholesaler was charged at the Magistrate's Court here today with murdering an Alam Flora supervisor last week.

Teoh Kian Peng from Tanah Putih here nodded when the charge was read to him in Bahasa Melayu before magistrate Najwa Hashim.

However, no plea was recorded from the accused – who is believed to have been drunk during the incident – for the charge under Section 302 of the Penal Code, which carries a mandatory death sentence upon conviction.

Based on the charge sheet, Teoh is accused of murdering Irwan Herman Kamarudin, 41, along the Jalan Kuantan Bypass near Petronas Bukit Rangin here at about 9.20pm on May 25.

Deputy public prosecutor Nasrul Hadi Abdul Ghani did not offer bail, saying that it was a non-bailable offence.

Nasrul Hadi said the accused will be detained while waiting for proceedings to begin and requested a new mention date to allow the prosecution to receive case-related documents.

"The prosecution will wait for the post-mortem, and the Puspakom (Computerised Vehicle Inspection Centre), Chemistry Department and forensic reports.

"The accused will be sent to the Penor Prison," he said.

Meanwhile, Teoh's lawyer, Tay Yi Kuan, sought permission to explain the charge to his client for a few minutes after today's proceedings.

Najwa later set July 8 for mention.

Irwan Herman was killed after his Toyota Yaris was hit by the driver of a Toyota C-HR, which was moving against the flow of traffic, along the stretch.

He was travelling to work in Gebeng, near here, and was killed on-the-spot due to chest injuries, while the suspect escaped with light bruises.

The suspect is believed to have consumed alcohol at a friend's house in Semambu before getting behind the wheel of his vehicle and driving against traffic flow before the crash. - New Straits Times, 1/6/2020

Man Out Delivering Food Killed By Suspected Drunk Driver In KL

Kirat Kaur


A food delivery rider died in the early hours of the morning after a suspected drunk driver crashed into his motorbike at the Sultan Iskandar Highway in Kuala Lumpur.

Malay Mail reports that the 1.30 am accident involved 44-year-old victim Mohamed Zaili Mohamed, a contract worker who was on his way home to Bukit Antarabangsa after delivering food sold by his wife.

The police have clarified that he was not a rider under FoodPanda despite images of the food delivery service bag seen at the accident site.

Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department chief ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that it is believed that his motorcycle was struck from behind by a dark blue Nissan Grand Livina.

The hit led to the victim crashing into the shoulder of the road and his motorcycle was dragged for around 2km. Mohamed Zaili died on the spot with severe head injuries, while the 21-year-old driver was unharmed.

According to ACP Zulkefly, the driver stopped under the Titiwangsa LRT station pedestrian bridge after being detained by the public. He was then arrested and brought to the Jalan Tun HS Lee police station where he was screened. Alcohol content was detected in the man’s breath.

The case is currently being investigated under Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987 which covers driving under the influence of liquor or drugs.

Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987.
(Credit: Search Results Web result with site links Attorney General’s Chamber Official Portal)

Food delivery rider dies in KL highway accident involving suspected drink-driver aged 21

Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that the fatal road accident occurred at around 1.30am this morning at the Sultan Iskandar Highway heading to the Kuala Lumpur city centre. — Bernama pic
Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that the fatal road accident occurred at around 1.30am this morning at the Sultan Iskandar Highway heading to the Kuala Lumpur city centre. — Bernama pic

KUALA LUMPUR, June 1 — A 44-year-old man died in the wee hours this morning after a 21-year-old driver suspected of drink-driving was believed to have crashed into his motorcycle at a highway in Kuala Lumpur, the police has said.

Kuala Lumpur Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department chief ACP Zulkefly Yahya said that the fatal road accident occurred at around 1.30am this morning at the Sultan Iskandar Highway heading to the Kuala Lumpur city centre.

The accident involved 44-year-old victim Mohamed Zaili Mohamed who was a contract worker residing in Bukit Antarabangsa, Selangor and who was on a red motorcycle of the Honda Ex5 model, while the driver is a 21-year-old youth who was driving a dark blue Nissan Grand Livina.

Zulkefly said Mohamed's motorcycle was believed to have been struck from behind by the Nissan Grand Livina while he was on the way home to his residence in Bukit Antarabangsa after delivering food sold by his wife.

“As a result of that hit, the victim crashed to the left shoulder of the road and his motorcycle was dragged about 2km from the location that was hit by the Nissan Grand Livina. The driver stopped the vehicle under the Titiwangsa LRT station's pedestrian bridge after being detained by the public,” he said.

According to Zulkefly, the motorcyclist sustained severe injuries to the head and died on the spot, while the driver did not sustain any injuries. The back part of the motorcycle was found damaged, while the Nissan Grand Livina's front parts were found damaged.

While photos of the incident showed a FoodPanda food delivery pack, Zulkefly has confirmed that the motorcyclist was not a rider under the food delivery service, clarifying that the motorcyclist was delivering food prepared by his wife.

The driver was arrested and brought to the Jalan Tun HS Lee police station, with screening tests showing that there was alcohol content detected in the man's breath, Zulkefly said.

The police are investigating the case under Section 44(1) of the Road Transport Act 1987.

Section 44(1) covers the offence of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, with the crime being driving while under the influence to the extent of being incapable of having proper control of the vehicle or having alcohol levels in the body beyond the prescribed limits and causing the death or injury of any person.

The offence is punishable by a jail term of between three to 10 years, and a fine of between RM8,000 to RM20,000, with conviction also resulting in the offender being disqualified from having a driving licence for not less than five years from conviction date, while repeat offenders would be barred for 10 years from conviction date from having a driving licence.

In a separate statement, Kuala Lumpur police chief CP Datuk Seri Mazlan Lazim confirmed the facts of the case where the motorcycle was dragged about 2.2km from the incident scene, adding that the Evidential Breath Analyser screening test on the suspect showed that the alcohol content in his breath had exceeded limits.

Mazlan said the driver will be remanded for further investigation.

“The Kuala Lumpur police seriously views the issue of drunk drivers that put the lives of other road users in danger. To curb this issue, the police will carry out more operations.

“Besides that, the public is also advised to be more responsible and not to be selfish, by avoiding from driving the vehicles themselves if they are intoxicated,” Mazlan said, adding that those with queries or information to share could contact the Jalan Tun HS Lee police station at 03-20719999 or the Kuala Lumpur police hotline at 03-21159999 or any nearest police station. - Malay Mail, 1/6/2020