Yes - after 31st August 2015, MAS Bhd may be nothing but an empty shell with no business, work, assets and monies...
1/9/2015 is the day that the new company, Malaysian Airline Berhad(MAB) will start operating the Malaysian airlines...
1/9/2015 is the day that the new company, Malaysian Airline Berhad(MAB) will start operating the Malaysian airlines...
Now all cases involving MAS Bhd have come to a halt - the effect of the 'moratorium' - and when the 'moratorium ends, will MAS Bhd have anymore capacity to do justice to workers claiming wrongful dismissal, claiming other rights in law, ...
The government of Malaysia now owns both companies - and the Najib Tun Razak is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Khazanah Nasional..the owner on behalf of all Malaysians.
A government that cares will not 'simply visit further injustices' on workers, unions and others in court in legal disputes claiming rights against MAS Bhd - But to date, it seems that Najib and his government seem not to care > all they are interested is 'saving the Malaysian Airlines' business...
Do we know why MAS failed? Who was responsible for these failures? Well, in any company, the person who make the ultimate decisions are the owners and between general meetings, it is the Board of Directors? What has happened to these Directors? Why have they not be penalised? Or are they still there...?
So, is it really 'saving the airlines' - or is it really just another 'bail out'? Is it all a 'trick' to get more of Malaysians' money to help out a business?
MAS Bhd was a private company, not a wholly owned Malaysian company. Now, it is, after Khazanah bought back all the shares from the private entities/individuals - but wait, Malaysia plans to later sell shares of the new entity(MAB) to private entities/individuals - WHY?
Should we not just make the airlines a Statutory Body? Keep in totally owned and controlled by the Malaysian government? Then, maybe the Auditor General can monitor it and keep us informed of all the 'wrong-doings' and abuses... [Now, the Auditor General does not as of right audit even GLCs, even if they are wholly owned by Malaysia.] Hence, we and even Parliament cannot continuously monitor our money and how it is not 'wasted', 'donated',...
MAS Act unjust to workers and trade unions
We, the undersigned 66 civil
society organisations, trade unions and concerned groups, are disturbed
by the Malaysian government’s unjust use of an Act of Parliament to
suspend and/or deny existing worker rights in law, including also access
to justice mechanisms, for the benefit of a private business and
employer, being the Malaysian Airlines System Berhad (MAS Bhd), now a
wholly-owned private company by Malaysia’s Khazanah Nasional Berhad.
Malaysia
tabled and passed speedily the Malaysian Airline System Berhad
(Administration) Act 2015 [Act 765], which came into force on 20/2/2015.
This Act is most unjust to workers and trade unions of employees of the
airline.
The Act, in section 11, states that “...on the
appointment of the Administrator, a moratorium shall take effect during
which... (e) no proceedings and no execution or other legal process in
any court or tribunal may be commenced or continued with, and no
distress may be levied, against the Administered Companies or their
property except with the prior written consent of the Administrator;” -
whereby the Administered company includes MAS Bhd, its wholly owned
subsidiaries and some partially owned subsidiaries. The Administrator
was appointed on or about 25/5/2015, and the period of administration
could last for a maximum period of two years commencing from the date of
the appointment of the Administrator.
What is disturbing is that
when administration and moratorium ends, all monies, assets and business
of MAS Bhd would most likely be transferred to a new legal entity
Malaysian Airline Berhad(MAB). MAS Bhd would most likely be left an
empty shell.
Rights cases against MAS Bhd stopped
There
are currently many cases initiated and filed, now pending before access
to justice mechanisms, including tribunals and courts between workers
and MAS Bhd, the employer, claiming wrongful dismissal and/or other
worker rights, or between trade unions and MAS Bhd. The effect of the
moratorium is that all these actions and cases will stop, and not
proceed further until administration of MAS Bhd ends.
At the end,
when moratorium is lifted, MAS Bhd would most likely be an empty shell -
with no work and no money. Hence, it will be workers and trade unions
that will suffer. Workers and trade unions do not just lose their right
to justice, but also will have to shoulder additional loses, including
all the monies utilised for lawyer and court fees, time and others.
For
many workers, it may also mean loss of wages for the days they could
not work because they had to attend at relevant departments, tribunal or
court in their pursuit for justice. Hence, not only will workers and
trade unions be denied justice, but will suffer even more injustice by
reason of this anti-worker legislation.
Right to join parties to satisfy worker claims denied
Normally,
when the employer has lost the ability to provide remedies, damages or
compensation to satisfy the claims of the worker, to ensure justice, the
worker can proceed with an application to join third parties to the
suit, possibly the owners (Khazanah Nasional) or others.
This MAS
Act now unjustly prevents this ability to join parties, in amongst
others, in section 25(2), which states that “ The Malaysia Airlines
Berhad, the appointer and the Administrator shall not be named as a
party in any claim or application made or joined as a party in any
proceeding commenced or continued by or on behalf of any employees or
former employees of the Administered Companies pursuant to the
Industrial Relations Act 1967 [Act 177], Employment Act 1955 [Act 265],
Sabah Labour Ordinance 1950 [Sabah Cap. 67], Sarawak Labour Ordinance
1952 [Sarawak Cap. 76] or the Trade Unions Act 1959 [Act 262].’
In
fact, section 25(1) says clearly, amongst others, that ‘...the
Administered Companies, the Administrator, appointer or the Malaysia
Airlines Berhad shall not - (a) be regarded as the successor, assignee
or transferee or a successor employer to the Administered Companies; (b)
be liable for any obligation relating to any retirement plan or other
post-employment benefit plans in respect of the employees or former
employees of the Administered Companies or any predecessor of the
Administered Companies that exists prior to the assumption of control or
appointment; or (c) be liable for any sum which is calculated by
reference to a period of time prior to the Malaysia Airlines Berhad
becoming the employer of the person in question…’
Same owner of both MAS Bhd and new Malaysian Airline Berhad (MAB)
Considering
that the it is Khazanah Nasional that is the sole owner of MAS Bhd, and
also the new company MAB, clearly all that is happening is really
nothing other than the ‘same person changing shirts’ - and justice would
demand that the new entity MAB or the owner, Khazanah, should be justly
taking over the obligation and responsibility of MAS Bhd especially for
cases involving worker and trade union rights.
The new MAB and
MAS Bhd, both owned by Khazanah, really is nothing other that the same
owner
forming a new company to escape responsibility and liability to
workers, is also supported by the following:-
- Christoph Mueller, the new chief executive of MAS Bhd, was appointed on 1/5/2015, would later assume the same position with MAB. Same CEO for MAS Bhd, and new MAB?
- When the employees of MAS Bhd received their termination letters in early June 2015, those that were offered employment by the new MAB, were offered a different termination package from those not offered employment in MAB. Those offered employment in MAB, which was to take effect from 1/9/2015, were asked to continue coming in to work in MAS Bhd, while the others, about 6,000, were asked to stop coming in to work with the assurance they will continue to receive normal salary but could not commence employment with another employer before Aug 31, 2015 unless they first get approval of MAS Bhd’s Human Resource Department. For many airline employees, other than basic wages, income from allowances and such if they are working makes up sometimes 50 percent or more of their monthly take home income. Rightly, all employees of MAS Bhd, irrespective of whether they will be later employed in MAB, should have received the same benefits and ex-gratia on termination by MAS Bhd.
In the name of justice, MAB or Khazanah or the Malaysian government
should really take over the obligation of any or all claims of employees
and trade unions against MAS Bhd.
Avoiding just principles of lay-off and termination
When
an employer wants to reduce staff, they would justly retrench the
number of workers they no longer need - and there are just requirements
that need to be complied in any retrenchment exercise like the ‘Last In
First Out’(LIFO) principle. Here, this is avoided by MAS Bhd simply
terminating all employees on Aug 31, 2015. Justly, the about 6,000 who
were no longer required to come into work since June, should have been
laid off then and there and paid all their entitlements.
Union busting?
With
the termination of all employees of Malaysia Airlines Systems Bhd (MAS
Bhd), it would also mean the demise of about seven in-house trade
unions.
The only national trade union, the National Union of
Flight Attendants Malaysia (Nufam), managed to show support of 62.73
percent of the qualified employees, and obtain the minister’s order that
made it a recognised union in MAS Bhd. Rather than accept this, MAS
Bhd went for judicial review challenging the minister’s decision.
Nufam
alleges that only two out 10 executive committee members of the union,
who are employees in MAS Bhd have been offered employment in the new
MAB.
As such, this ‘restructuring exercise of the airline’ and this new law can also be considered a means of union busting.
Loss of regular employment until retirement
Many
workers who are regular employees until retirement in MAS Bhd, who have
been offered employment in the new MAB find that they will now become
precarious employees on short-term contracts, some even on three or six
months employment contracts. There is no law in Malaysia that stipulates
that short-term contract employees will continue as employees if the
work they were hired to do still exist.
Short-term and other
precarious forms of employment also would likely deter union formation
or involvement, deter workers from claiming rights and facilitate easier
exploitation of workers.
Ignoring workers’ and families’ financial security and well-being
Workers
in Malaysia have families and dependents, and also many now have
monthly loan-repayment obligations, and justly they should be provided
secure regular employment until retirement, whereby they still could be
terminated for misconducts, or laid off where the employers has to
reduce jobs.
Whilst Malaysia says that it is concerned about the
airline business, it has demonstrated a serious lack of concern for the
welfare and well-being of workers.
We therefore urge:
That
the said Malaysian Airline System Berhad( Administration) Act 2015 be
repealed, and the effect this Act has had on workers and trade unions be
reversed. No law should be enacted to suspend/deny worker rights for
selected employers;
That all pending cases with regard to labour
matters, be it with workers or unions, shall be justly resolved or
settled forthwith by MAS Bhd, and its owners Khazanah Nasional;
That
for all worker and trade union cases against MAS Bhd, MAB and Khazanah
Nasional shall agree to be joined in as parties and assume obligations
of MAS Bhd to workers;
That if the Malaysian Airlines is desirous
of reducing the number of employees, it be done by letting go employees
in compliance with the Last In First Out (LIFO) principle and other
established just legal principles;
That if the Malaysian Airlines
is to be taken over by another entity, like the Malaysian Airlines
Berhad (MAB), workers should be employed by MAB as secure regular
employees and not by means of precarious forms of employment like
short-term contracts;
That Malaysia considers the rights, welfare
and wellbeing of workers and their families are just as important, if
not more, than the wellbeing and profits of government-owned or linked
businesses.
Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud
Mohd Roszeli Majid
Pranom Somwong
For and on behalf the 66 organisations, trade unions and groups listed below
Aliran
Airlines Workers’ Union Sarawak
Alternative Asean Network on Burma (Altsean-Burma)
Asia Monitor Resource Centre (AMRC), Hong Kong
Centro de Reflexión y Acción Laboral, Cereal (Labour Studies and Action Centre), México
Centre for Orang Asli Concerns (COAC), Malaysia
Clean Clothes Campaign
Club Employees Union Peninsular Malaysia
Committee for Asian Women
CWI Malaysia (Committee For Workers’ International, Malaysia)
Daeduck Employees Union-Ind., CEPZ, Rosario, Cavite, Philippines
Eagle Ridge Golf Course and Residential Estate Employees Union, Cavite, Philippines
Electronic Industry Employees Union (EIEU) Southern Region, Peninsular Malaysia
Electronic Industry Employees Union (EIEU) Northern Region, Peninsular Malaysia
Garment and Allied Workers Union, Haryana, India
Globalization Monitor
Hye Sung Workers Union, CEPZ, Rosario, Cavite, Philippines
Institut Perempuan (Indonesia)
Jaringan Kampung Orang Asli Semenanjung Malaysia (JKOASM)
Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Perodua
Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Mitsui Copper Foil (MCFEU)
Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja MHS Aviation Berhad (MHSEU)
Kesatuan Eksekutif Airod
Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Perodua Engine Manufacturing Sdn Bhd
Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional Sdn Bhd (KPP Proton)
Knights For Peace, International
Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (Madpet)
Network of Action for Migrants in Malaysia (NAMM)
Nagkakaisang Manggagawa ng Keyrin (trade union), CEPZ, Rosario, Cavite, Philippines
North South Initiative
Malaysian Humanist and Rationalist Movement (‘myHARAM’)
Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC)
Metal Industry Employees’ Union (MIEU), Malaysia
MAP Foundation, Chiangmai, Thailand
Masyarakat Akar Rumput (Makar Indonesia)
Migrante International
Myanmar Ethnic Rohingya Human Rights Organization Malaysia (MERHROM)
National Union of Transport Equipment & Allied Industries Workers (NUTEAIW)
National Union of Flight Attendants Malaysia (Nufam)
National Union of Hotel, Bar and Restaurant Workers (NUHBRW)
National Union of Journalists (NUJ) Cawangan Utusan Melayu
National Union of Tobacco Industry Workers (NUTIW)
National Union Employees in Companies Manufacturing Rubber Products (NUECMRP)
Non-Metallic Mineral Products Manufacturing Employees Union (NMMPMEU)
National Union of Banking Employees (NUBE)
Paper Products Manufacturing Employees’ Union of Malaysia (PPMEU)
Parti Rakyat Malaysia (PRM)
Peoples Service Organization (PSO)
Perak Women for Women Society (PWW)
Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor & Wilayah Persekutuan (Permas)
Persatuan Sahabat Wanita Selangor
Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor
Persatuan Komuniti Prihatin Selangor dan Kuala Lumpur
PINAY (Filipino Women's Organization in Quebec), Canada
Pusat Komas
Railwaymen’s Union of Malaysia (RUM)
Sahabat Rakyat
School of Acting Justly, Loving Tenderly and Treading humbly (SALT)
Solidarity of Cavite Workers, Cavite, Philippines
Tenaga National Berhad Junior Officers Union (TNBJOU)
Tenaganita
Workers Assistance Center, Inc (WAC)
WH4C (Workers Hub For Change)
Yayasan Lintas Nusa Batam - Indonesia
Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja Airod Sdn Bhd
Society for the Promotion of Human Rights, Malaysia (Proham)
No comments:
Post a Comment