Friday, December 12, 2025

Health Club Raid - SUHAKAM raises concerns about PRIVACY, legality of the Raid/Arrest/Detention/Disciplinary Actions, Pre-Conviction 'defamation' of patrons and business?

Recently, there was a police raid on what the police allegedly said was 'a health club believed to have been used for unnatural sexual activities'. Pictures of men in towels were circulated ... 

Was not the premises a LEGAL business operation - which had the needed permits by the Local Government/Council, and all other needed permits/licenses by relevant authorities - unfortunately no mention of the establishment, or these relevant facts. If they were carrying out any 'illegal activities' - then naturally the premises and the business would be de-registered > to date no mention of this.

If the police/authorities raid a LEGAL massage parlour - and ask customers getting a massage to step out, not giving them time to bathe or change into their clothes - they too will end up just with towels.

No body used a SAUNA fully clothed..Nobody uses a Jacuzzi fully clothed...Nobody uses a hot bath, or even a swimming pool fully clothed - and if the authorities did not allow them to change into their normal clothes - and made them come out in their towels... it will end up with a group of towel clad men..and sometimes even women. DOES this mean that they are involved in 'illegal' or unnatural sexual activities.

At the end of the day - there was NO EVIDENCE of any illegal or unnatural sexual activities. Even if there was, it would definitely not involve ALL the patrons in a LEGAL Business establishment..

After the raid, all the patrons were arrested indiscriminately and the police then went to apply for REMAND so they could detain them for more than 24 hours - and guess what, we had a GOOD Majistrate, who did not blindly give the remand order simply based on the police/authorities allegations...

WHY did this happen? Our PM Anwar Ibrahim was previously tried and convicted for SODOMY - and the convictions was affirmed by both appellate courts - including the Federal Court, and he was sentenced to imprisonment -Months before he completed serving his sentence, after PH won the GE, he was released from incarceration by reason of a ROYAL PARDON. However, Anwar has always insisted on his INNOCENCE - and, after he became Prime Minister, there has been crackdowns - was it to prove that Anwar Ibrahim was straight - and not a gay, bisexual or one with other sexual preferences?

* A concert was stopped because 2 of the male performers kissed one another on stage - but NO charges was levied against them - WHY? Was it because they were popular foreign artists? 

* There was a crackdown where 172 rainbow-coloured SWATCH watches were illegally seized, because that 'rainbow colour' was identified with other kinds of sexual preferences > 

* Then, there was a crackdown on GISBH -  were allegations of human trafficking, exploiting children....- children were asked to sodomise other, etc ... BUT since the crackdown that happened more than a year ago, there has still been NO court convictions proving the truth of these allegations. Even, if there 1 or 2 cases of Sodomy, the only crime of any leader, officer or GISBH is not reporting the crime >> and even then, whether SODOMY occurred and whether the perpetrator ought to be charged is up to the police after investiagtion and the Public Prosecutor.. to date, I believe there is still NO charges..

* The health club crackdown follows a 'similar mindset' - a crackdown on unnatural sexual activities?

One wonders is it all about the IMAGE of the PM Anwar Ibrahim - a demonstration that he is against all forms of 'unnatural' sexual activities, and other sexual preferences other than the traditional man-woman sexual activity? Then, the IMPORTANT question, as to whether Malaysia should CRIMINALIZE sexual activities different from man-woman sexual activities? 

DANGER...danger - a perusal of the current SODOMY offences makes criminals of even husbands if they do certain crimes.. The definition of 'carnal intercourse against the order of nature' NEED to be amended - if not how many husbands within a lawful marriage may also be guilty of the CRIME?

377A  Carnal intercourse against the order of nature

Any person who has sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature.

Explanation Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual connection necessary to the offence described in this section.

LGBTQ - What consensus of the Malaysian people? Did Anwar misrepresent to the world? Repeal Section 377B Penal Code - decriminalize consensual sexual acts between man and wife, and consenting adults?

Back to the RAID on the Health CLUB - there are other issues - like PRIVACY, and also the 'defamation' of the patrons?

If the premises are LEGAL - then it is wrong also to target Public Officers caught in the RAID - Is there a LAW preventing Public Officers going for masssage, sauna, hot baths, jacuzzi or even health centres? NO - there is NOT at the moment.

Is there any ISLAMIC law prohibiting Muslims from going for a massage, sauna, jacuzzi, public baths, etc...? 

WHO made the police report - should he/she also be investigated? Was there some other ULTERIOR motive on the part of the maker of the report?

If someone makes a police report of immoral and illegal sexual activities happening at the PM's residence/premises or some Minister's or some political party premises, would the police have acted in a similar manner? 

Consider, some of the possible reasons for such a RAID on massage centres and health clubs?

# CORRUPTION - would some premises to prevent such raids, that can seriously impact their businesses now be willing to "BRIBE" the police or others to prevent such publicized raids? 

# ELIMINATION OF BUSINESS COMPETITION - did some competing business try to get rid of a competitor? After all customers tend to avoid premises that have been raided by the authorities, and patrons end up being arrested or taken in for questioning? WORSE if it is reported in media, as people tend to blindly believe on reported allegations...and so the victims, although later proven innocent or the report/allegations baseless do suffer the prejudice caused...

This is NOT the first time - for we often read of arrest of WOMEN, usually foreigners, on premises allegedly providing illegal sexual services - here too, we then do not see any trial or convictions for the said charges... so, everyone would have got the impression that they are prostitutes or sex-workers breaking Malaysian laws > when they may be just INNOCENT persons. Many of the foreigners may later find themselves being sent back after their social visit passes expire... and once, they are out of Malaysia, they cannot even easily take action against the law enforcement officers...

As SUHAKAM pointed out - law enforcement cannot simply raid/arrest/detain based on just some police report -  

SUHAKAM notes reports that the raid was conducted and arrests hastily effected without the presence or identification of victims. Enforcement actions, especially involving personal conduct and arrest, must be based on verified information and credible evidence. In the instant case, the absence of identifiable victims and evidence, as clarified by the Kuala Lumpur Police Chief Officer (CPO), raises concerns about the basis of the mass arrests and any ensuing disciplinary measures.

Here, they did not even have ANY EVIDENCE of the Crime, or even any 'VICTIM' of the alleged crimes.   

 

 

Media Statement No. 56-2025_SUHAKAM Calls for Transparent and Fair Process Following Raid at Wellness Centre

No comments: