Health - a reason given for pice hikes for sugar, but really this seems not true

One of the reasons being given for the price increase of sugar was that it was bad for health.If that be the case, then what the government should have done is to impose strict regulations on products using sugar.

Remember that increasing the price of sugar will automatically increase the cost of a lot of other products - including the teh tareks and kopi-O ice. 

Polls are being done to get the reaction of the people about the 'price hikes' - but wonder whether the poor in the rural and urban area are the subject of these polls. Of course the rich and the middle class, and/or public servants (who now receive good pay and have job security until retirement...pensions thereafter) may not feel the 'pinch'...the sufferings caused by these 'price hikes'. Our UMNO-led BN government is trying to sell 'price hikes' as something positive using the word 'subsidy cuts'... but the truth of the matter, is that it is really 'price hikes' and the majority in Malaysia suffers by reason of this.

What kind of regulations if health was a seriuous concern of the government?

1 - set the limit of sugar that is being used especially in canned  & bottle drinks - xxx gram per 100 ml, and also insist that all companies also produce "sugar free" or "less sugar" versions of their product.

2 - include also a notice just like that presently on cigarette packets - about the danger of consuming more sugar...maybe also with some scary pictures.

3 - for companies using an unhealthy amount of sugar in their products - a 'tax', whereby the money collected should be channeled to use for treatment of excess sugar diseases, dialysis centres, etc.

Reactions in a street poll to yesterday's fuel, natural gas and sugar price hikes were mixed, with many saying they have not felt the pinch yet, while others criticised the increases as unjustified.

All the respondents to the poll in Bangsar expressed shock over the government's sudden move, but not all felt that their current lifestyles would be affected.

“A five sen increment in petrol prices is not a big burden to the public in this day and age,” said 37-year-old civil servant Hasnulhasi Yasin.

Drinks vendor Mohd Sofian and restaurant owner Mohd Iqbal stressed that even though the price of sugar has increased, their prices would remain the same.

“I won't suffer any losses as a result of the sugar price hike. But it would mean less profit instead,” lamented Mohd Iqbal.

'Increases unjustified'

However, many disapproved, because they felt that the price increases were unjustified.

“The prices have gone up because the government is too comfortable now, but when things take a turn for the worse, they will lower the prices again,” said Vivekananda Sukumaran, a 22-year-old law student.

18-year-old marketing executive Mohd Harith added that the government did not offer sufficient reasons for the move.

“The government should match the prices with the public's earnings. Now, it would be difficult to enjoy drinks like we used to because sugar is more expensive”

On Friday midnight, the government raised prices of fuel, natural gas and sugar to reduce expensive subsidies.

Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak said that the controversial “upward price adjustments” would save the government more than US$230 million or RM750 million in subsidies this year.

RON95 grade petrol and diesel prices rose by RM0.05 per litre, whilst RON97 grade petrol will be floated according to market price.

Liquified petroleum gas went up by RM0.10 per kilogramme and sugar prices have increased RM0.25 per kg.

The government has however said it will still be spending RM7.82 billion until the end of the year on fuel and sugar subsidies.

The subsidy cuts are believed to be the first stage of the govenment's plans to reduce subsidies for essential goods as proposed by the Performance and Delivery Unit (Pemandu).

Idris Jala, Pemandu's chief executive officer had warned that Malaysia would face bankruptcy by 2019 and risk becoming like debt-ridden Greece, if subsidies were not cut.

If the only action of the government is to increase prices - then surely that is not because it is a caring government concerned with the health of its people.

Why can's we all have sight of the annual income-expenditure statement of the Federal Government, and State governments. Then, we will all be able to see where the money is coming from ...and how is it being spend - and we will be able to tell the government not to waste money of unnecessary things like military submarines, etc..- Malaysiakini, 17/7/2010, Price hike reactions: Some say 'unjustified'