Showing posts with label Lock-Up. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lock-Up. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 08, 2020

Detain the infected - and Malaysia cause the healthy to become infected with Covid-19? 128 infected in the Sabah Covid-19 lock-up cluster?

 

Media Statement – 8/9/2020

128 infected in the Sabah Covid-19 lock-up cluster following arrest and detention of infected – Lack of regulations, lock-up condition and overcrowding contributory factors.

Foreigners who became undocumented because of the pandemic should not be arrested, or treated as illegal migrants

MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture) reiterates our call for lock-up and prison reforms, in the light of recent report  when Malaysia recorded a massive jump in new Covid-19 cases on 7/9/2020, with 62 cases, of which 50 were from the new Benteng Lahad Datu Covid-19 cluster in Sabah, which emerged  due to condition of lockups that allowed infections to spread rapidly, the Health Ministry said today. (Malay Mail, 7/9/2020)

Today (8/9/2020), there were 100 new Covid cases, and 62 of these cases originated from the Benteng Lahad Datu cluster in Sabah(Malay Mail, 8/9/2020). This brings the total infected in the Benteng Lahad Datu Covid-19 cluster to 128.

“Based on the risk analysis performed, the transmission of Covid-19 for this cluster was due to the cramped and crowded lockup quarters. It was found that physical distancing was also hard to implement. This is the main factor contributing to Covid-19 infections among inmates,” Health director-general Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah said in a statement (Malay Mail, 7/9/2020)

A total of 66 positive cases from the cluster registered thus far, Dr Noor Hisham said 64 of them involved inmates while two more involved a prison guard and his nephew.

It all started with the arrest of infected persons who were then detained with other Covid-19 free detainees. The source of this Sabah cluster was traced back to the arrests of two undocumented migrants who were then held in police custody at the Lahad Datu police headquarters on August 24.

MADPET and others, have previously highlighted this risk, where it was suggested that alleged Movement Control Order(MCO) violators and others suspected of small crimes should not be arrested, and thereafter detained with others especially during this pandemic – the risk of Covid-19 infection is simply too high.

It is sad that this is happening almost 5 months after the beginning of the Covid pandemic, and Malaysia has failed to learn from past experiences, especially after from the past cases of infections in Malaysia’s Immigration Detention Depots, where to date there have been infections at the Bukit Jalil Detention Depot (650 infections and 1 death), Sepang(72 infections), Semenyih(65), Semenyih 2(1) and Putrajaya(2).

The introduction of possibly infected persons to an otherwise Covid-free community in detention facilities must end. Testing and mandatory 14-day quarantine is a must. Temporary detention in already gazetted quarantine centres is an option.

MADPET urges that new regulations be put in place in all detention facilities, including police lock-ups, which would include the non-introduction of new detainees to detainee population until they have first been tested and/or quarantined, to ensure social distancing whereby there must be no overcrowding.

Persons who do not have to be remanded to enable authorities to complete investigations should not be.

Malaysians already know that remand of suspects is really not necessary for the purposes of investigation, as was demonstrated in many cases involving prominent persons including the case of former Prime Minister, who has now been convicted of 7 crimes of abuse of power, corruption and money laundering.

Remand should never be used as a form of ‘punishment’ by authorities, and one must never forget the only purpose of remand is for the purpose of investigation only.

After arrest, suspects can always be released on police bail, their passports could be seized to counter flight risk, and there could be other conditions placed, like turning up at the station for investigation at a particular day and time. There is no need to place them in remand.

The need for general improvement of Malaysia’s already overcrowded detention facilities to meet with international standards must be a government priority.

Malaysian Prisons Department Deputy Director-general (Security and Correctional) Datuk Alzafry Mohamed Alnassif Mohamed Adahan, was recently reported saying that there are currently ‘68,000 prison inmates are currently housed in 42 prisons nationwide…’ and that this ‘…number exceeded the prescribed capacity of 52,000…“ (Sun Daily, 8/8/2020).

About 25% of them are remand pre-trial prisoners, and the problem for many maybe poverty and thus inability to afford to pay the bail amount. The government should really release a majority of these pre-conviction prisoners on reduced bail or even personal bond, especially when they are being charged and tried for not so serious crimes that did not cause injury or death.

Migrants who became undocumented after the MCO began 

Certain categories of undocumented migrants should never have even be arrested and detained. This could include:-

-       Those whose permits and/or social visit passes expired, and could not return to their home countries because of travel restrictions;

-       Those whose permits/visas could not be renewed because even Immigration Departments were closed during the start of the MCO;

-      Those whose permits could not renewed or extended because of loss of jobs as their employer’s business were affected by the pandemic; and

-    Those who were documented migrant workers, who had an employment agreement for 3-5 years, who now cannot renew their permits because of a sudden change in Malaysian government’s policy restricting the sectors allowed to employ migrant workers

Many foreigners have no choice but to remain in Malaysia since there is still major restrictions of travel out of Malaysia back to their country of origin. There could be other reasons, including the failure of employers to yet provide for their flight tickets back home. Many have simply become too poor by reason of loss of jobs and/or income to now even afford to go back. Malaysia provided financial assistance to Malaysians, but not to migrants – including documented migrants.

Malaysia may want to provide for an amnesty to all these categories of foreigners and migrant workers, which will include no arrests and detentions until the end of movement control orders, and the restoration of international air travel.

We want Malaysian migrants in other countries to be cared for by those countries they are in, and as such Malaysia, must set an example by being a caring government, and should also look into providing assistance to foreigners to help them survive in Malaysia during this pandemic until they are able to return home.

 

Charles Hector

For and on behalf of MADPET(Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture)

 

 

Dr Noor Hisham: Crowded lockup to blame for rapid spread of Benteng Lahad Datu cluster

Health director-general Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah said the source of the cluster was traced back to the arrests of two undocumented migrants who were then held in police custody at the Lahad Datu police headquarters on August 24. — Picture by Choo Choy May
Health director-general Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah said the source of the cluster was traced back to the arrests of two undocumented migrants who were then held in police custody at the Lahad Datu police headquarters on August 24. — Picture by Choo Choy May

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 7 — The new Benteng Lahad Datu Covid-19 cluster in Sabah emerged due to the cramped and crowded condition of lockups that allowed infections to spread rapidly, the Health Ministry said today.

Earlier today, Malaysia recorded a massive jump in new Covid-19 cases today, with 62 cases, of which 50 were from the aforementioned cluster that first emerged on September 1.  

Health director-general Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah said the source of the cluster was traced back to the arrests of two undocumented migrants who were then held in police custody at the Lahad Datu police headquarters on August 24.

Both inmates tested positive for Covid-19 on August 31 and were admitted to Lahad Datu Hospital for treatment.

“Based on the risk analysis performed, the transmission of Covid-19 for this cluster was due to the cramped and crowded lockup quarters.

“It was found that physical distancing was also hard to implement. This is the main factor contributing to Covid-19 infections among inmates,” he said in a statement here.

Dr Noor Hisham reiterated the importance of complying with the standard operation procedures, adding that they must be practised at all times regardless of place.

With a total of 66 positive cases from the cluster registered thus far, Dr Noor Hisham said 64 of them involved inmates while two more involved a prison guard and his nephew.

After the first index case was reported, Dr Noor Hisham said 1,404 people have been screened through the ministry’s active case detection and close contact screening measures.

“A total of 631 inmates, 98 prison staff, 157 family members, 78 police officers and 440 government agency officers have been screened with a positivity rate of 4.7 per cent,” he said.

The cluster involved two districts of Lahad Datu and Tawau in Sabah, of which 30 Malaysians and 36 non-Malaysians have so far tested positive.

In Lahad Datu, 420 people have been screened with 337 testing negative and 33 awaiting their results.

In Tawau, 984 people have been screened with 230 testing negative and 738 awaiting their results.- Malay Mail, 7/9/2020

Health Ministry: Malaysia records another Covid-19 spike today, with 100 new cases

People wearing face masks are pictured outside Pavilion Kuala Lumpur February 10, 2020. — Picture by Firdaus Latif
People wearing face masks are pictured outside Pavilion Kuala Lumpur February 10, 2020. — Picture by Firdaus Latif

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 8 — Malaysia recorded another massive jump in new Covid-19 cases today, the Health Ministry has announced.

Of the 100 new cases registered today, 85 were local transmissions with the remaining 15 imported.

According to the ministry, 62 of these cases originated from the Benteng Lahad Datu cluster in Sabah which first emerged on September 1.

The remaining 23 came from the Sungai cluster in Kedah that was confirmed yesterday.

Today’s figure is the highest since the recovery movement control order (RMCO) came into effect on June 10.

Previously, the highest number of daily reported cases during this period was 62 as was registered yesterday.

Health director-general Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah said the 100 new cases today brought the cumulative infections in Malaysia to 9,559.

“Of this number, 295 are currently active and have been isolated and are undergoing treatment,” he said during his bi-weekly press conference.

The 15 import cases include six from India, two from Indonesia, and one each from Pakistan and the Philippines.

“Meanwhile 12 cases were reported to have recovered from Covid-19 today, bringing the total number of recoveries in Malaysia to 9,136 cases or 95.6 per cent of all total cases.

“Presently seven positive cases are being treated in intensive care units, with four requiring breathing assistance. There have been no deaths reported today, leaving the total number of deaths at 128 cases or 1.34 per cent of all total cases,” Dr Noor Hisham said.

The latest ministry statistics showed that 431 people have been screened in Lahad Datu with 87 testing positive, while in Sungai 470 have been screened in Kedah with 25 testing positive, five in Penang with no positives, and four in Perlis with one positive.

Due to the increase in infections, the director-general said the government took steps to tighten border control in relation to high-risk countries since yesterday.

“The Immigration Department has tightened the entry of citizens from 23 countries into Malaysia. Their entry will depend on the Long-Term Visit Pass, and is applicable to citizens from countries which have recorded a cumulative excess of 150,000 Covid-19 cases or more.

“This is one of the steps taken to secure border control. The ministry will continue the risk-assessment of countries worldwide, with the latest list of countries facing restrictions to be updated and announced by the government from time to time,” he said.

From July 24 to yesterday, approximately 29,330 individuals arriving to Malaysia were placed at quarantining stations.

Of this number, 237 have since tested positive for Covid-19, with the bulk from India at 42 cases, followed by the Philippines at 27 cases, and Indonesia at 26 cases. _Malay Mail, 8/9/2020

 

Friday, March 06, 2009

CCTV with recording capability in all interogation rooms - but still not enough....

We definitely need CCTV (with recording capabilities) in all police stations, and if we did have them already, then it would have been so easy to investigate and to find out what really happened to Kugan (died in police custody - starved, burned, beaten...) OR B Parabakar and C Solomon (allegedly tortured in police custody - scalded with hot water) OR Lourdes Mary (denied required healthcare) .

Was the suspect arrested and detained by the police treated according to the law? Well - here is the CD containing the CCTV recordings(with audio) concerning the suspect to prove that all his rights were recognized and respected. This is what happens in Hong Kong, whereby the police do provide the suspect's lawyers copies of the recordings to prove that all was done in accordance with the law...

These CCTV recordings show how the suspect is informed about his rights...how the interogation was carried out ...how the identity parade was conducted, etc..

Time for the Malaysian Police (and maybe the Minister in charge) to run over to Hong Kong and study their very good practice - so that we can implement the same in Malaysia very very soon.

In Malaysia, some police stations already have CCTV - but alas, I found out that they do not have recording ability...and that there is no audio.

Now, the police is saying that they will install CCTV in interogation rooms - and I hope these will have recording capabilities with audio. (and hopefully they will be working in good condition all the time....)

But, it should not just be at the interogation rooms and the lock-ups, it must be all over the police station. In fact, even police cars and vehicles should be equiped with CCTV. Even police officers on duty can be hooked up with CCTV.

Police will install CCTVs in the interrogation rooms of all police stations.

CID Director Comm Datuk Seri Mohd Bakri Zinin said the installation would be done in stages, with state police headquarters and district headquarters as priority areas.

“The logistics are being worked out. Once we have all in place, we will start installing them to avoid any more allegation of abuse or torture.

“The interrogation rooms will have to be redesigned to accommodate the CCTV,” he said after handing over forensic equipment and polylight (ultraviolet light to detect fingerprints and stains) to the police forensics team at the Senior Police Officers College in Cheras yesterday.

Comm Mohd Bakri said the idea to have CCTV-installed rooms was mooted by Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan, who visited several countries recently and found there were special rooms with audio and CCTV recording facilities for interrogation purposes.

Although police had such facilities here, it was confined only to certain lock-ups. - Star, 5/3/2009, Interrogation rooms in police stations to be monitored




Friday, January 30, 2009

Right of the Arrested: Free Phone Calls, Right to inform friend...meet lawyer...

The law has changed from before - and now persons arrested do have the right to phone calls...

When arrested, the police MUST

a) Tell you the reason for the arrest

b) Allow you to get in touch with a friend or relative to tell them where you are, etc - and the police must provide means of communication (phone, etc) for free. No more asking for RM50 or more to use the phone...

c) Allow you to get in touch with a lawyer (and thereafter provide for a chance for you to meet up with your lawyer) - the police is not to start questioning or take a statement until you have had the opportunity to meet with your lawyer...

(Of course there are some exceptions....

Anyway, the fight for these rights were rejuvenated by the Malaysian Bar when they passed unanimously the following resolution in 2000...

Motion 5:

Whereas:

1. When a person is arrested in Malaysia, he can be detained by the police for a maximum period of not more than 15 days if the police utilize the powers pursuant to section 117 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

2. In Malaysia, there is no right to a phone call. The suspect cannot inform his lawyer, his family, friends and employer of the fact of his arrest and detention.

3. The constitutionally guaranteed right of access to a lawyer may be denied, even though the words used in Article 5(3) Federal Constitution is “Where a person is arrested he …SHALL be allowed to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.”

4. Access to the lawyer is a right that should be available from the point of arrest. When a suspect is brought before the Magistrate pursuant to Section 117 Criminal Procedure Code and when the suspect is charged in court, he/she has the right to be represented by a lawyer.

5. The police do NOT have a duty in law to inform the lawyer: (a) whether the suspect will be charged in court OR whether the police are applying for further detention to complete their investigations. If the latter be the case, the police have no duty in law to inform the exact time when the suspect will be brought before the Magistrate; and the identity of the said Magistrate before whom the suspect will be brought for the section 117 application.

It is hereby resolved:-

A. That the Malaysian Bar expresses concern over the denial of the fundamental liberty guaranteed by Article 5(3) of the Federal Constitution to a majority of the suspects arrested and detained in the police lock-ups.

B. That the Malaysian Bar calls on the Malaysian Government to ensure that the right of access to a lawyer upon arrest and the right to be represented by a lawyer, especially during section 117 applications, be recognised and respected by the police and all concerned.

C. That the Bar Council does whatsoever necessary to ensure that the RIGHT TO ONE PHONE CALL, at the very least, be accorded to a suspect when arrested.

D. That the Bar Council does whatsoever necessary to ensure that the police is vested with the duty in law to inform lawyers of the detained suspect as to whether they are opting for an application for further detention pursuant to section 117 Criminal Procedure Code, and if so, at what time the suspect will be brought before a Magistrate and which Magistrate will be hearing the said application so as to give full effect to the right to a lawyer upon arrest.

Proposer: Mr Charles Hector
Seconders: En. Amin Hafiz
Ms Mary Manickam

Resolution:

The Motion was unanimously carried. (Source: Malaysian Bar Website)
And finally in 2006, it became law...and in middle 2007 this law came into force....See section 28A of the Criminal Procedure Code...

28A. Rights of person arrested.

(1) A person arrested without a warrant shall be informed as soon as may be of the grounds of his arrest by the police officer making the arrest.

(2) A police officer shall, before commencing any form of questioning or recording of any statement from the person arrested, inform the person that he may-

(a) communicate or attempt to communicate, with a relative or friend to inform of his whereabouts; and

(b) communicate or attempt to communicate and consult with a legal practitioner of his choice.

(3) Where the person arrested wishes to communicate or attempt to communicate with the persons referred to in paragraphs (2)(a) and (b), the police officer shall, as soon as may be, allow the arrested person to do so.

(4) Where the person arrested has requested for a legal practitioner to be consulted, the police officer shall allow a reasonable time-

(a)for the legal practitioner to be present to meet the person arrested at his place of detention; and

(b)for the consultation to take place.

(5) The consultation under subsection (4) shall be within the sight of a police officer and in circumstances, in so far as practicable, where their communication will not be overheard.

(6) The police officer shall defer any questioning or recording of any statement from the person arrested for a reasonable time until the communication or attempted communication under paragraph 2(b) or the consultation under subsection (4) has been made.

(7) The police officer shall provide reasonable facilities for the communication and consultation under this section and all such facilities provided shall be free of charge.

(8) The requirements under subsections (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) shall not apply where the police officer reasonably believes that

(a) compliance with any of the requirements is likely to result in

(i) an accomplice of the person arrested taking steps to avoid apprehension; or

(ii) the concealment, fabrication or destruction of evidence or the intimidation of a witness; or

(b) having regard to the safety of other persons the questioning or recording of any statement is so urgent that it should not be delayed.

(9) Subsection (8) shall only apply upon authorization by a police officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police.

(10) The police officer giving the authorization under subsection (9) shall record the grounds of belief of the police officer that the conditions specified under subsection (8) will arise and such record shall be made as soon as practicable.

(11) The investigating officer shall comply with the requirements under subsections (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) as soon as possible after the conditions specified under subsection (8) have ceased to apply where the person arrested is still under detention under this section or under section 117.

[Ins. Act A1274; Subs. Act A1304]