Sunday, February 21, 2010

56 Groups Letter to ASEAN - Plight of Workers in Burma

Open Letter
 
19 February 2010

 
Dr Surin Pitsuwan,
Secretary General of ASEAN,
The ASEAN Secretariat,
70A Jl. Sisingamangaraja,
Jakarta 12110 , Indonesia
Tel : (6221) 7262991, 7243372
Fax : (6221) 7398234, 7243504

 
Heads of Government of
Brunei Darussalam , Cambodia , Indonesia ,
Lao PDR, Malaysia , Burma ( Myanmar ), Philippines ,
Singapore, Thailand & Viet Nam ,
c/o Secretary General of ASEAN


 
Dear Sirs/Madam,

 
Re:      Justice for Workers in Burma
            3,600 Workers Protest for Worker Rights – February 2010

 
On 8/2/2010, about 3,600 factory workers, mostly women, from 3 factories in the Hlaing Tharyar industrial zone in Rangoon , Burma , protested against low wages and the substandard working conditions they are forced to endure in the factories.

 
It was reported that the workers at the Taiyee shoe factory and the Opal 2 garment factory began protests on Monday calling for higher daily wages, overtime payments and several other demands. On Tuesday, workers from the Kya Lay garment factory joined the strike action.

 
The workers, mostly women, staged protests outside the factories and inside a factory compound, where they sat down and refused to work. The three factories employ a total of about 3,600 workers.

 
The monthly income of most factory workers in Burma is very low, ranging from 20,000 kyat [USD20] to 40,000 kyat [USD40], thus forcing many workers to work overtime. Most workers work from 7 am to 11 pm daily. Many factory owners employ temporary workers who have no legal recourse if they are fired without compensation, according to former factory workers in Rangoon . More than 80 percent of factory workers in Rangoon work on a day-to-day basis. Most are young women between 15 and 27 years of age who come from the countryside in search of a better living.
[The Irrawaddy, Authorities Threaten Violence at Rangoon Strike – http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=17771]

 
The workers’ demands in these actions, for example, with regard to wages, as was reported, are for a mere USD10 increase per month.

 
The Burmese government’s response to this legitimate industrial action by workers was excessive and oppressive It was reported that, the “…Authorities used barbed wire barricades to block roads leading to the factories in the Hlaing Tharyar industrial zone in the city's north-east, and more than 50 truckloads of riot police carrying batons and shields were deployed and at least six fire engines and five prison vans were parked near the factories…” [AP - Straits Times, 10/2/2010, Myanmar workers on strike]

 
Today (19/2/2010) although the workers are back in the factories, they continue demanding for their rights. In Burma , they are even more vulnerable and powerless without a change in the existing laws to allow the right to assembly and to allow workers the right to form unions.

 
Burma is a member of ASEAN, and as such we call upon ASEAN and all ASEAN member countries to do the needful to ensure that workers in Burma, just like other workers in other ASEAN countries, also receive just wages, have a safe and healthy working environment, enjoy the right to form unions and all other universally acknowledged worker and human rights.

 
We also call on ASEAN, and ASEAN member countries to closely monitor the current situation at the Hlaing Tharyar industrial zone, and ensure that these workers rights are recognized and respected, and that the Burmese government refrains from further interfering in this pursuit of rights by workers in Burma .


 
Further, on 23 October 2009, the Heads of State/Government of ASEAN presided over the Inaugural Ceremony of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR), during which they also announced the “Cha-am Hua Hin Declaration on the Inauguration of the AICHR” to pledge full support to this new ASEAN body and emphasize their commitment to further develop cooperation to promote and protect human rights in the region.

 
Noting that the primary purpose of the AICHR is to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms of the peoples of ASEAN, we hope that the AICHR will begin proving that it is not merely a toothless tiger by ensuring that the human rights of these workers in Burma are promoted and protected.

 
Many ASEAN member countries, like Malaysia , Singapore and Thailand , invest significantly in Burma . We hope that these economic and other self-interest considerations will not affect the way ASEAN, and its member nations, response to human rights violations of the ordinary people and workers in ASEAN.

 
I look forward to hearing your response,

 
Yours sincerely,

 
      -sgd-
Pranom Somwong
Charles Hector
 
3585A Kg Lubuk Layang,
Batu 3, Jalan Mentakab,
28000 Temerloh, Pahang, Malaysia. Tel+60192371300
 
 
For and on behalf of the 56 Organizations/groups listed below:-

 
ALTSEAN-BURMA
All Kachin Students and Youth Union
All Burma Federation of Student Unions (Foreign Affairs' Committee)
Asia Pacific Forum on Women Law and development (APWLD)
Asia Pacific Solidarity Coalition (APSOC)
Asian Migrants Center(AMC)
Alliance of Progressive Labor (APL) – Youth and Women
Amnesty International Philippines
Batis Aware, Philippines
Burma Global Action Network
Burmese Women's Union (BWU)
Burmese Rohingya Association in Japan
Burma Campaign , Malaysia
Canadian Friends of Burma (CFOB)
Center for Migrant Advocacy (CMA) Philippines
Center for Overseas Workers (COW)
Coalition against Trafficking in Women – Asia Pacific
Chin Democracy and Human Rights Network ( South Korea )
Civil Society Committee of LLG Cultural Development Centre Bhd(LLGCSC), Malaysia
Committee for Asian Women (CAW)
Coordination of Action Research on AIDS and Mobility (CARAM) Asia
Democratic Party for a New Society (DPNS)
Empower Foundation , Thailand
Free Burma Coalition Philippines (FBC-Philippines)
Free Burma Coalition – Philippines (Women's Committee)
Foundation for Education and Development, Thailand
Human Rights Education Institute of Burma (HREIB)
Human Rights and Development Foundation ( Thailand )
Initiatives for International Dialogue (IID)
JERIT (Oppressed People's Network , Malaysia )
Kachin Development Networking Group
Labour Behind the Label, United Kingdom
MAP Foundation , Thailand
Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC)
MSC/NWC-  Sri Lanka , 
MAKALAYA (Women Workers Network)
Migrant Forum in Asia (MFA)
National League for Democracy [NLD (LA)], Malaysia
Network of Action for Migrants in Malaysia (NAMM)
Network for Democracy and Development
Parti Sosialis Malaysia (Socialist Party of Malaysia , PSM)
Pagkakaisa ng Kababaihan para sa Kalayaan (KAISA-KA)
Piglas Kababaihan
Partido ng Manggagawa (PM - Workers' Party)
Seoul-Gyeonggi-Incheon Migrants' Trade union (MTU), Korea
Studio Xang Art for Migrant Children, Thailand
Thai Labour Campaign (TLC), Thailand
Think Center ( Singapore )
The Action Network for Migrants (ANM), Thailand
The Shan Refugee Organization (SRO), Malaysia
Task Force on ASEAN and Burma (TFAB)
Worker Hub for Change (WH4C)
Women Health, Philippines
World March for Women - Philippines
 
 
 
c.c.     Workers in Burma -  solidarityburma@gmail.com
 
 

Thursday, February 18, 2010

ISA :- Malaysia, an obedient servant of US?some "...other governments, international intelligence agencies and anti-terrorist bodies..."?

So did some country(ies) ask Malaysia to arrest A, B, C,.... if they turn up in Malaysia, and then send them to us?

So, when A, B, C,.... was found in Malaysia, Malaysia dutifully arrested and detained these people under the ISA...., and will now be sending them to....where?

Has Malaysia become a 'faithful servant' to some country(ies)? Hishamuddin seem to imply that these arrest was made because someone else told Malaysia to do this...
Hishammuddin said the arrests of the nine was proof of the Malaysian authorities’ capabilities and their good working relations with other governments, international intelligence agencies and anti-terrorist bodies.- Star, 18/2/2010, Nine foreigners with alleged terror links will be sent home, says Hisham
Was the US behind this? Were the persons arrested really Palestinian, Iraqi, Afghanistan 'freedom fighters'? US and Israel will consider those fighting for Palestinian independence and freedoms 'terrorists' - and will Malaysia hand them over to be possibly 'tortured', detained, etc...?

So, Malaysia would blindly arrest and hand over persons to which countries? to which 'international inteligence agencies'?..to which 'anti-terrorist bodies'?

What happens to these persons if they are subsequently tortured, denied a fair trial, killed? What then is Malaysia's position? What then would be Malaysia's sin? Is Malaysia  now pro-US? Or is Malaysia pro-human rights and justice? 

What about presumption of innocence until proven guilty? This has to apply to all persons... go see Malaysia's Constitution, i.e. Art. 8 that guarantees this equality and equal treatment to all persons

(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.

Are these people under the ISA really refugees? 

Are they mere suspects? 

More importantly, did they commit any crime in Malaysia that allows the Malaysian authority to arrest and detain them...and now, deport them to who knows where?

A person can be arrested and detained under the ISA only if it is going to be prejudicial to the security of Malaysia... (not if it is going to be prejudicial to the security of US, Israel, France,...the world...)


(1) If the Minister is satisfied that the detention of any person is necessary with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of Malaysia or any part thereof or to the maintenance of essential services therein or to the economic life thereof, he may make an order (hereinafter referred to as a detention order) directing that that person be detained for any period not exceeding two years.

UMNO youth recently protested about Malaysia's sovereignty in front of the Australian embassy concerning some remarks opinions about the Anwar trial. Maybe, they should also be protesting about these 'ISA arrests' ... ? 

You cannot simply arrest any person, and then detain them under the ISA...and then later deport them.

Malaysians deserve to know why Malaysia arrested them under the ISA. Who asked that they be arrested? 

Getting into good books of "other governments, international intelligence agencies and anti-terrorist bodies" is no justification of arresting people under the ISA.

I wonder whether Malaysia would arrest the operators of the un-manned US drones that bombed and killed innocent civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan? Surely, these were also acts of terrorism that goes against the rule of law? Or will Malaysia only do the bidding of selected countries and bodies?

PUTRAJAYA: Arrangements are being made to extradite the nine foreigners who were detained recently under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for alleged links with international terrorist organisations.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said the nine are high on their home countries’ wanted list and the respective governments were reported to be already making arrangements for them to be extradited.

“I hope that they will be extradited as soon as possible because I want to reduce the number of people being detained under the ISA.

“I have worked so hard at reducing the number (of detainees) but in one night, I filled up (the detention centre) again,” he told reporters after chairing his ministry’s post-Cabinet meeting here yesterday.

Hishammuddin said the arrests of the nine was proof of the Malaysian authorities’ capabilities and their good working relations with other governments, international intelligence agencies and anti-terrorist bodies.

Last month, 10 people — nine of them foreigners — were held under the ISA.

The minister, however, declined to provide details on where and when the suspected terrorists were arrested and which terrorist networks they were linked to. Star, 18/2/2010, Nine foreigners with alleged terror links will be sent home, says Hisham

How many migrant workers were wrongly arrested? detained? Be truthful..reveal all Mr Home Minister

The Home Minister 'smartly' reveals not the number of arrests made - but the number of detentions made. He is reported to have said, "...47,310 detentions were made..." in 2009.

"This involved 26,545 cases of illegal entry; 8,655 cases of overstaying after the visit pass or permit had lapsed; 6,836 cases of flouting pass or permit conditions or having fake permits; and the rest were for other offences," he said.

Then, he gives a breakdown for the reasons of detentions...

26,545 cases of illegal entry
8,655 cases of overstaying after the visit pass or permit had lapsed 
6,836 cases of flouting pass or permit conditions or having fake permits
That brings the total to 42,036 persons - and what are the possible other offences that caused the other  5,274 to be detained. 

Were they detained because they could not produce their original passport and pass/permits because the employer wrongly was holding on to them? I believe that this could have been the reason for the arrest and detention. 

Remember, this is Malaysia, and we have stories of even Malaysians being arrested and detained in the these Detention Centres. I recall the story of the pregnant Malaysian women who was arrested and detained for months....[Pregnant Malaysian mum wrongfully detained in Migrant Detention Centre for 11+ months ]

How many innocent persons, with proper documentations, were arrested and detained by Malaysia's Immigration, RELA, etc.? Based on the figures provided, and in light of the lack of detailed information of the possible other offences, I would say that at least 5,274 were wrongly arrested and detained at the Detention Centres. 

But, that does not indicate at all the numbers that were arrested, 'treated like "criminals" ' for hours/days, and later released because they were innocent? That could be a rather high figure - maybe even 100,000....a guess, no doubt. Mr Minister, do tell us the number that were arrested and released later because they were innocent, and their travel papers/visa/pass were all valid and proper.

I am also very doubtful about the figures given by the Minister - it seems a bit low. Between 2006 and 2008, it was disclosed in Parliament that there were 248,939. [If we take it as being 3 years, then number of detainees per year was about 83,000].

Mohsin Fadzli had also wanted to know the number of illegal immigrants held between 2006 and 2008 and the centres where they were detained in as well as the period of their detention.

Abu Seman said 248,939 were held at immigration depots nationwide during the period.- - Star, 10/12/2009, Parliament: RM30mil spent to send back 154,729 illegals

How many were really arrested and detained? Or is the Home Minister telling us that Malaysia is finally cutting down on its crackdowns on migrant workers?

A mechanism and system will be established to monitor the status of each foreigner in the country from the time they enter the country and leave??? - do we not already have it. Surely in all countries, including Malaysia, this already exists - just check the Immigration Computer records, Mr Minister. I am sure that the Immigration Department can tell you at any time whether a foreigner (tourist or migrant worker) is still in country or have left the country. So, this 'new proposal' may just be another scheme to waste public funds unnecessarily...



A mechanism and system will be established to monitor the status of each foreigner in the country from the time they enter the country and leave, said Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein.

He said enforcement should be under a comprehensive monitoring mechanism which could only be set up if there was a integrated information system.

bagan pinang by election nomination 031009 hishammuddin hussein"We are studying to improve the current information system to enable the checking of the status of a foreigner at any time and at any place.

"Our purpose is to check on the whereabouts of a foreigner who is not having legal status so that the person would be worried and concerned enough to leave the country quickly," he said in a statement today.

Hishammuddin (left), who saw for himself the large number of foreigners in the federal capital during the Chinese New Year holidays, said the proposal to have the mechanism will be tabled at the cabinet committee on foreign workers and illegal immigrants meeting which will be chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin on Feb 22.

"Taking into account that the issue of foreigners involves various ministries and agencies it is necessary that the proposal be tabled at the cabinet committee level that involves 13 ministries," he said.

Employers to assist

Hishammuddin said improvement in the management and monitoring of foreigners through a new strategy was needed in line with the current scenario where the movement foreign workers in and out of the country was difficult to detect through conventional means.

As an example, he said although enforcement involved various agencies from time to time, it still could not fully deter the entry of illegal immigrants.

bangladesh foreign workers migrants 030108As many as 7,099 operations had been conducted by the Immigration Department throughout the country last year and 47,310 detentions were made.

"This involved 26,545 cases of illegal entry; 8,655 cases of overstaying after the visit pass or permit had lapsed; 6,836 cases of flouting pass or permit conditions or having fake permits; and the rest were for other offences," he said.

Besides that, he said employers who hired foreign workers would also be roped in to help out as they played an important role in ensuring an effective improvement in the management and monitoring of foreigners.

– Bernama - malaysiakini, 16/2/2010, On-demand tracking of foreigners in the works

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

ASEAN HR Commission (AICHR) - a 'toothless' tiger?

ASEAN... ASEAN Community...and ASEAN people - this is what Malaysia and the other ASEAN member countries are trying to work towards.

Soon, like the European Union, there will be freedom of movement of the peoples of ASEAN across the borders of ASEAN nations. There will be a common ASEAN market... and one ASEAN community.

We are talking about 1Malaysia now...but soon we will be talking about 1ASEAN - but let us all hope that this all not just about the market...or economic/financial matters only - but is also about human rights and justice. 

The ASEAN have taken the 'first' step in the setting up of the ' ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights' (AICHR) - but alas there are concerns about this structure.

1- Decision Making - just like the ASEAN, there is a requirement for 'consensus' (6.1). This means that if the ASEAN wants to act against a Human Rights violation committed by Malaysia, and the Malaysian representative only votes against this, then the AICHR will not be able to act. It should have been simple majority or 2/3 majority - not consensus.

2. We have a Commission - but it seems to be only a 'consultative body' and a 'toothless' tiger. But, let us give it a chance and see how it performs..

It is time for Malaysians (ASEANs) to discuss more about the ASEAN, in particular this AICHR
* Who should be allowed to forward complaints about Human Rights violations to the AICHR?
* What kind of human rights violations should it be dealing with? 
* How should the representatives of the AICHR be selected? Maybe in ASEAN Countries that do have Human Rights Commission - it should be that Human Rights Commission that chooses one of its present(or past) HR Commissioners to be part of this AICHR. For ASEAN countries that have yet to have National Human Rights Commissions, they should immediately take steps to set up Human Rights Commission. There must be a direct relationship between the National Human Rights Commissions and this ASEAN Human Rights Commission. 
* The names of the members(and the alternate member) to the AICHR must be disclosed. There must be safeguards put in place to ensure independence and immunity.
* There must also be a change of name, i.e. by dropping the "Intergovernmental", so it becomes the ASEAN Commission on Human Rights. This will make clear that this Commission is not merely confined to matters that are 'intergovernmental' - and can deal with human rights violations affecting individual persons, private companies/bodies, etc...



Terms of Reference of ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights

Pursuant to Article 14 of the ASEAN Charter, the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) shall operate in accordance with the following Terms of Reference (TOR):

1. PURPOSES

The purposes of the AICHR are:

1.1       To promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms of the peoples of ASEAN;

1.2       To uphold the right of the peoples of ASEAN to live in peace, dignity and prosperity;

1.3       To contribute to the realisation of the purposes of ASEAN as set out in the ASEAN Charter in order to promote stability and harmony in the region, friendship and cooperation among ASEAN Member States, as well as the well-being, livelihood, welfare and participation of ASEAN peoples in the ASEAN Community building process;

1.4       To promote human rights within the regional context, bearing in mind national and regional particularities and mutual respect for different historical, cultural and religious backgrounds, and taking into account the balance between rights and responsibilities;

1.5       To enhance regional cooperation with a view to complementing national and international efforts on the promotion and protection of human rights; and

1.6       To uphold international human rights standards as prescribed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, and international human rights instruments to which ASEAN Member States are parties.

2. PRINCIPLES

The AICHR shall be guided by the following principles:

2.1       Respect for principles of ASEAN as embodied in Article 2 of the ASEAN Charter, in particular:
a)         respect for the independence, sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity and national identity of all ASEAN Member States;
b)         non-interference in the internal affairs of ASEAN Member States;
c)         respect for the right of every Member State to lead its national existence free from external interference, subversion and coercion;
d)         adherence to the rule of law, good governance, the principles of democracy and constitutional government;
e)         respect for fundamental freedoms, the promotion and protection of human rights, and the promotion of social justice;
f)          upholding the Charter of the United Nations and international law, including international humanitarian law, subscribed to by ASEAN Member States; and
g)         respect for different cultures, languages and religions of the peoples of ASEAN, while emphasising their common values in the spirit of unity in diversity.

2.2       Respect for international human rights principles, including universality, indivisibility, interdependence and interrelatedness of all human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as impartiality, objectivity, non-selectivity, non-discrimination, and avoidance of double standards and politicisation;

2.3       Recognition that the primary responsibility to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms rests with each Member State;

2.4       Pursuance of a constructive and non-confrontational approach and cooperation to enhance promotion and protection of human rights; and

2.5       Adoption of an evolutionary approach that would contribute to the development of human rights norms and standards in ASEAN.

3. CONSULTATIVE INTER-GOVERNMENTAL BODY

The AICHR is an inter-governmental body and an integral part of the ASEAN organisational structure. It is a consultative body.

4. MANDATE AND FUNCTIONS

4.1.      To develop strategies for the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms to complement the building of the ASEAN Community;

4.2.      To develop an ASEAN Human Rights Declaration with a view to establishing a framework for human rights cooperation through various ASEAN conventions and other instruments dealing with human rights;

4.3.      To enhance public awareness of human rights among the peoples of ASEAN through education, research and dissemination of information;

4.4.      To promote capacity building for the effective implementation of international human rights treaty obligations undertaken by ASEAN Member States;

4.5.      To encourage ASEAN Member States to consider acceding to and ratifying international human rights instruments;

4.6.      To promote the full implementation of ASEAN instruments related to human rights;

4.7.      To provide advisory services and technical assistance on human rights matters to ASEAN sectoral bodies upon request;

4.8.      To engage in dialogue and consultation with other ASEAN bodies and entities associated with ASEAN, including civil society organisations and other stakeholders, as provided for in Chapter V of the ASEAN Charter;

4.9.      To consult, as may be appropriate, with other national, regional and international institutions and entities concerned with the promotion and protection of human rights;

4.10.    To obtain information from ASEAN Member States on the promotion and protection of human rights;

4.11.    To develop common approaches and positions on human rights matters of interest to ASEAN;

4.12.    To prepare studies on thematic issues of human rights in ASEAN;

4.13.    To submit an annual report on its activities, or other reports if deemed necessary, to the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting; and

4.14.    To perform any other tasks as may be assigned to it by the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting.

5. COMPOSITION

Membership

5.1       The AICHR shall consist of the Member States of ASEAN.

5.2       Each ASEAN Member State shall appoint a Representative to the AICHR who shall be accountable to the appointing Government.

Qualifications

5.3       When appointing their Representatives to the AICHR, Member States shall give due consideration to gender equality, integrity and competence in the field of human rights.

5.4       Member States should consult, if required by their respective internal processes, with appropriate stakeholders in the appointment of their Representatives to the AICHR.

Term of Office

5.5       Each Representative serves a term of three years and may be consecutively re-appointed for only one more term.

5.6       Notwithstanding paragraph 5.5, the appointing Government may decide, at its discretion, to replace its Representative.

Responsibility

5.7     Each Representative, in the discharge of his or her duties, shall act impartially in accordance with the ASEAN Charter and this TOR.

5.8      Representatives shall have the obligation to attend AICHR meetings. If a Representative is unable to attend a meeting due to exceptional circumstances, the Government concerned shall formally notify the Chair of the AICHR of the appointment of a temporary representative with a full mandate to represent the Member State concerned.

Chair of the AICHR

5.9      The Chair of the AICHR shall be the Representative of the Member State holding the Chairmanship of ASEAN.

5.10    The Chair of the AICHR shall exercise his or her role in accordance with this TOR, which shall include:

a)         leading in the preparation of reports of the AICHR and presenting such reports to the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting;

b)        coordinating with the AICHR’s Representatives in between meetings of the AICHR and with the relevant ASEAN bodies;

c)       representing the AICHR at regional and international events pertaining to the promotion and protection of human rights as entrusted by the AICHR; and

d)         undertaking other specific functions entrusted by the AICHR in accordance with this TOR.

Immunities and Privileges

5.11     In accordance with Article 19 of the ASEAN Charter, Representatives participating in official activities of the AICHR shall enjoy such immunities and privileges as are necessary for the exercise of their functions.

6. MODALITIES

Decision-making

6.1    Decision-making in the AICHR shall be based on consultation and consensus in accordance with Article 20 of the ASEAN Charter.

Number of Meetings

6.2       The AICHR shall convene two regular meetings per year. Each meeting shall normally be not more than five days.

6.3       Regular meetings of the AICHR shall be held alternately at the ASEAN Secretariat and the Member State holding the Chair of ASEAN.

6.4       As and when appropriate, the AICHR may hold additional meetings at the ASEAN Secretariat or at a venue to be agreed upon by the Representatives.

6.5       When necessary, the ASEAN Foreign Ministers may instruct the AICHR to meet.

Line of Reporting

6.6       The AICHR shall submit an annual report and other appropriate reports to the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting for its consideration.

Public Information

6.7       The AICHR shall keep the public periodically informed of its work and activities through appropriate public information materials produced by the AICHR.

Relationship with Other Human Rights Bodies within ASEAN

6.8       The AICHR is the overarching human rights institution in ASEAN with overall responsibility for the promotion and protection of human rights in ASEAN.

6.9       The AICHR shall work with all ASEAN sectoral bodies dealing with human rights to expeditiously determine the modalities for their ultimate alignment with the AICHR. To this end, the AICHR shall closely consult, coordinate and collaborate with such bodies in order to promote synergy and coherence in ASEAN’s promotion and protection of human rights.

7.  ROLE OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL AND ASEAN SECRETARIAT

7.1       The Secretary-General of ASEAN may bring relevant issues to the attention of the AICHR in accordance with Article 11.2 (a) and (b) of the ASEAN Charter. In so doing, the Secretary-General of ASEAN shall concurrently inform the ASEAN Foreign Ministers of these issues.

7.2       The ASEAN Secretariat shall provide the necessary secretarial support to the AICHR to ensure its effective performance. To facilitate the Secretariat’s support to the AICHR, ASEAN Member States may, with the concurrence of the Secretary-General of ASEAN, second their officials to the ASEAN Secretariat.

8. WORK PLAN AND FUNDING

8.1       The AICHR shall prepare and submit a Work Plan of programmes and activities with indicative budget for a cycle of five years to be approved by the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting, upon the recommendation of the Committee of Permanent Representatives to ASEAN.

8.2       The AICHR shall also prepare and submit an annual budget to support high priority programmes and activities, which shall be approved by the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting, upon the recommendation of the Committee of Permanent Representatives to ASEAN.

8.3       The annual budget shall be funded on equal sharing basis by ASEAN Member States.

8.4       The AHRB may also receive resources from any ASEAN Member States for specific extra- budgetary programmes from the Work Plan.

8.5       The AICHR shall also establish an endowment fund which consists of voluntary contributions from ASEAN Member States and other sources.

8.6       Funding and other resources from non-ASEAN Member States shall be solely for human rights promotion, capacity building and education.

8.7       All funds used by the AICHR shall be managed and disbursed in conformity with the general financial rules of ASEAN.

8.8       Secretarial support for the AICHR shall be funded by the ASEAN Secretariat’s annual operational budget.

9. GENERAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

9.1.      This TOR shall come into force upon the approval of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting.

Amendments

9.2.      Any Member State may submit a formal request for an amendment of this TOR.

9.3.      The request for amendment shall be considered by the Committee of Permanent Representatives to ASEAN in consultation with the AICHR, and presented to the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting for approval.

9.4.      Such amendments shall enter into force upon the approval of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting.

9.5.      Such amendments shall not prejudice the rights and obligations arising from or based on this TOR before or up to the date of such amendments.

Review

9.6.      This TOR shall be initially reviewed five years after its entry into force. This review and subsequent reviews shall be undertaken by the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting, with a view to further enhancing the promotion and protection of human rights within ASEAN.

9.7.      In this connection, the AICHR shall assess its work and submit recommendations for the consideration of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting on future efforts that could be undertaken in the promotion and protection of human rights within ASEAN consistent with the principles and purposes of the ASEAN Charter and this TOR.

Interpretation

9.8.      Any difference concerning the interpretation of this TOR which cannot be resolved shall be referred to the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting for a decision

****************************
Note:-  On 23 October 2009, the Heads of State/Government of ASEAN presided over the Inaugural Ceremony of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR), during which they also announced the “Cha-am Hua Hin Declaration on the Inauguration of the AICHR” to pledge full support to this new ASEAN body and emphasize their commitment to further develop cooperation to promote and protect human rights in the region

Parliamentary quorum should be 60% (not 11.7% as it is now) & Abolish Bloc Voting - Let MPs have the freedom of opinion

Well the people elect their representatives to Parliament - the Members of Parliament...but many MPs are not there most of the time in Parliament. Hence, the people do not have any real representative in the Dewan Rakyat (Parliament Lower House)... most of the time.

Odd too that MPs get and accept appointments as High Commissioners/Ambassadors - are we that short of good qualified people? Or rather the question should be is the UMNO-led BN so short of 'good' people? The Rompin MP, I believe is the US Ambassador is Jamaludin Jarjis, the Rompin MP - Wonder how he can serve his constituents in Rompin. Wonder how he can attend Parliamentary session. He should resign as MP - and let the people of Rompin elect a new MP.

Attendance in Parliament is pathetic on most days. People should just go visit Parliament, and sit in the public gallery and watch the proceeding. [There is a dress code - men (long sleeves with tie & p-ants), women (formal attire - no jeans, etc...)]. There are usually so few MPs from the UMNO-led BN, and now we are told that the quorum in the Dewan Rakyat is only 26 MPs (and that was the quorum apparently since pre-independence(1955), when the total number of MPs was only 52.

The quorum was thus 50% of the total MPs, but the UMNO-led BN (before the UMNO-led Alliance) was not interested in changing the quorum despite increasing the number of MPs, which stands at 222 today. Reasonably, the quorum should be 111 - but they never changed the quorum, and it apparently still stands at 26. Why? Because maybe the UMNO-led BN did not think democracy was very important ....did not think attendance in Parliament was very important...did not think Parliament was very important.

That explains also why reports of Parliamentary proceedings are given so little coverage by the print and electronic media. All the debates...and objections get voiced out in Parliament but then the media does not report this - and the people are kept in the dark. 

But, they have TV Parliament Reports - well, these are 'censored' ...selected - so that all the audience see is what the government wants you to see. You really do not see the views of the opposition, do you. Live telecasts - again, most of the time, it is interviews and stuff. Really, the government should just have TV4 - which will be broadcasting live proceedings from Parliament (or when Parliament is not sitting, maybe proceedings from State Legislative Assemblies). There is no need for commentaries...and analysis (or interviews) during sessions - all those could be done during the 'lunch breaks' or after the sitting for the day. 

Increase the quorum to at least 60% of the total number of MPs ...

Live telecast (without interruption) for the full parliamentary proceedings.

Bloc voting - this must definitely go, and MPs should be allowed to vote freely based on their own stand. The 'whip' should be used only in certain special circumstances - not always. This applies to both BN and Opposition MPs.

PETALING JAYA: The Barisan Nasional Backbenchers Club (BNBBC) is proposing to abolish the quorum and bloc voting as part of its recommendations on parliamentary re-form.

Its deputy chairman Datuk Abd Rahman Dahlan said a committee was looking through the recommendations and working closely with Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz.

“We have discussed the matter in general. It’s an ongoing process,” he told The Star yesterday.

“We have talked a lot about the Dewan Rakyat quorum since Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad’s time as BNBBC chairman.”

He said the quorum — 26 MPs or part of the 52 seats in the 1955 legislative election — had remained unchanged since Merdeka.

The Dewan Rakyat now has 222 seats with Barisan controlling 137 seats.

The proposal became crucial after Budget 2010 was nearly defeated at its third reading last Dec 14 when more than half of the Barisan parliamentarians were absent when the vote was called.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and his deputy Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had to rush to Parliament House that night to guarantee that the Budget was approved.

The Budget was passed with 66 votes coming from Barisan while 63 MPs from the Oppositions who were present blocked its approval.

Rahman said the committee was also looking at other recommendations to reform Parliament, including having more researchers for MPs and offices for them to conduct meetings.

“Parliament can be in session for months and the meetings can stretch for long hours. Some MPs have appointments, yet there is no specific area for them to hold meetings,” he added.
He said the committee had proposed that one of the halls be converted into offices for MPs to hold meetings.

The committee, he said, had also discussed introducing a national internship programme whereby undergraduates could be attached to MPs as interns.

Hopefully, he said the Higher Education Ministry would look into the proposal as it could be a way to expose undergraduates to how Parliament works. - Star, 17/2/2010, MPs: Get rid of quorum


Tuesday, February 16, 2010

MALAY or NON-MALAY, and Muslim or Non-Muslim - is this the new way of classifying students in Malaysia?

Apparently some(if not all) schools are now classifying students as MALAY or NON-MALAY, and Muslim or Non-Muslim. Is this a new policy of the UMNO-led BN government? of the Education Minister?

Previously, students were classified as Malay, Chinese, Indian, or Others...Previously, students were also classified as Muslims, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists and others...

Now, it seems that this new classification is a 'simplification' - but it certainly goes against Najib's 1Malaysia - as it still tends to instill 'differences' into even the minds of little children. Should not these ethnic distinctions in particular be removed once and for all? Should not we be talking about just being Malaysians?
Religion - well, there is an argument for still having this - possibly for religious education, etc - but really respect for the other religions must also be shown. It is so disrespectful to classify the rest of us in Malaysia as just being non-Muslims, is it not.

The problem with the classification of Malay-Non-Malay. Well, non-Malaysian Indonesians could also be Malays. 

Example:
* Announcement: "All Malay students go to class A for religious classes, and all non-Malay students go to class B for Moral Studies.." But some Muslim students ends up in Class B. Why because they are not Malays - but Indians and Chinese Muslims. 

Origins of forefathers seem to be a concern with the UMNO-led BN government, but not for all. There seem to be a concern about those who originally came from China, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka (Ceylon) - but really for those who came from Indonesia, Phillipines or Thailand. Surely, and most reasonably, the largest group of persons  would be those whose forefathers came from Indonesia (or other countries that share borders with Malaysia). But we do not see statistics about how many Malaysian Indonesians, Malaysian Thais, Malaysian Filipinos - but only statistics about Malaysian Chinese, Malaysian Indians, etc.. Why? Discrimination?
Finally, UMNO-led BN have reached the stage of acknowledging that we are one Malaysia with one Malaysian people - 1Malaysia is the slogan of the latest Prime Minister, Najib Tun Razak.

Is it just only a new 'slogan'? Or is the UMNO-led BN finally going to acknowledge and do things right?
But classifying people as Malay or NON-Malay, or as Muslim or NON-Muslim is really not the way forward...




Sunday, February 14, 2010

Government/Politicians - No need for hypocritical greetings/gestures... do what is required...

What is the meaning of concern and care for Malaysian, of Chinese heritage? 

Some of our Ministers and politicians think it is just handing out oranges during Chinese New Year (and making sure photos get taken and publicized)...or maybe walking around shaking hands and wishing 'Happy Chinese New Year" -- or maybe putting up those big banners all around town wishing everyone "Happy Chinese New Year"

Remember the people are not stupid - and all this is just a 'show' - not a true caring for the people... better for the government to get proper tarred roads built to cemeteries and temples. Good for a proper sign board to be put up, and maybe even road signs. 
In Temerloh, the road to the Christian cemetery is a very bad 'muddy road' - and the cemetery floods every time it rains.... , and, of course the local council have not put up a good sign board. The road to some Chinese temples are also in the same state of affairs. Hindu cemetery??? Same situation.

Show your respect and care for Malaysians, of Chinese heritage, and other Malaysians not by these pathetic 'hypocritical' acts of handing out oranges, placing banners, etc  BUT by some real action. You can start by ensuring proper roads build to access all temples and cemeteries. Start by allocating good land for usage of cemeteries - giving a 'swamp' for a community to use as a cemetery is wrong.


The peace we want is true peace - when there is already justice, democracy and rights...

Happy New Year to all...and this Year of the Tiger increase our resolve and actions towards greater justice, human rights, democracy, equality and peace.

I hope that we will truly become a truly democratic Malaysia soon - and that the people get back the power, that has been usurped by those that call themselves the 'people's representatives' and 'government'. What difference is Malaysia from other authoritarian dictatorship - the only time the people of Malaysia becomes important and gets a chance to 'express' themselves, and exert the 'people's power' is once every 5 years when we get a chance to vote for our Member of Parliament...and State Assemblyperson.

We sadly do not even the right to democratically elect our own kampung/kampung baru/taman/kampung orang asli/kawasan perumahan/condominium/flat representatives and leaders - in fact, the people are not even consulted - the State Government chooses the leaders/reps at this level. Why can't the rakyat democratically elect their local community leaders? [Only Perak , during the reign of PR, had kampung leaders democratically elected. Hopefully, this right to choose my own community leaders becomes a reality in this year of the Tiger.

Local Council Elections - Hopefully, this right to democratically choose my own Local Council  members becomes a reality in this year of the Tiger.

Senators -  Hopefully, this right to democratically choose my own Senators becomes a reality in this year of the Tiger.

Transparency 
- Hopefully minutes/decisions of Cabinet/State Exco (and Local Councils) are made available to the public, at the very least on the net.
- Hopefully Agenda & Minutes of the State Assemblies are  made available to the public through their respective website (This is not yet available in the Pakatan Rakyat States as well.) Look at the Parliament Website, and follow the same for the State Assemblies. All laws/enactments of the State should be available online (at least) so that the people know the laws.... [some Federal Laws can be bought in bookshops - but you cannot easily find State Laws...Local Council Rulings, etc...anywhere] So, just make this all available online. 

Death Penalty 
- Well, the Sultans have the power to pardon - and maybe all death sentences should be commuted to life imprisonment ...or natural life imprisonment. So many 'mules' get cheated into carrying drugs, and they do not deserve death by hanging See:- Star, 1/11/2009, Malaysian girls easily duped
See also earlier posts:-

Sultans/YDPs in Pakatan Rakyat States can lead the way by commuting death sentence to imprisonment

 MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY PROVISIONS IN LAW SHOULD BE REPEALED

Is Pakatan for the abolition of the death penalty? Malaysian girls easily duped (Star)

It is a NEW YEAR - and let it re-ignite our HOPE ... and drive us to action to struggle for justice, human rights, democracy and peace in Malaysia

We are not talking about the peace - brought about by fear, by silence, by 'not standing up for rights', etc..

The peace we want is true peace - when there is already justice, democracy and rights...

Thursday, February 11, 2010

In support of Burmese workers struggle for worker rights

Standing up for your rights takes a lot of courage - and there is always risks involved. 

And in a country like Burma (Myanmmar), under a 'notorious' military junta, it really takes even more uts for people to stand up for their rights...and it was recently reported that Burmese workers have decided to stand up in 2 factories...

And the government's response was to send '....more than 50 truckloads of riot police carrying batons and shields were deployed and at least six fire engines and five prison vans...'.

We call on the Burmese military government not to 'crackdown' on the workers, who have every right to demand their rights. It is hoped that the workers demands are given due consideration - and that they be paid a reasonable wage. 
Low wages, poor inhumane working conditions, etc are some of the reasons why so many people of Burma have fled to neighbouring Thailand and Malaysia.

ASEAN should maybe step in, to ensure that their member, the Burmese military government, do not further stifle the rights of these workers. Trade Unions from fellow ASEAN nations, International Labour Organisation (ILO) and others should also press for a fair resolution of what really is a dispute between workers and the employer. Better wages and better working conditions are long overdue in Burma...

Myanmar workers on strike

Truckloads of riot police carrying shields are parked on a road leading to Hlaing Tharyar industrial zone in Myanmar. Myanmar's military government tightened security at the industrial zone where factory workers were staging a rare strike for better pay. -- PHOTO: AP

YANGON (Myanmar) - MYANMAR'S military government tightened security on Wednesday at an industrial zone in Yangon where factory workers were staging a rare strike for better pay. 

Protests of any kind are unusual in Myanmar, where the junta does not tolerate dissent. 

Authorities used barbed wire barricades to block roads leading to the factories in the Hlaing Tharyar industrial zone in the city's north-east, and more than 50 truckloads of riot police carrying batons and shields were deployed and at least six fire engines and five prison vans were parked near the factories. 

Workers at the Taiyee shoe factory and the Opal 2 garment factory began protests on Monday calling for higher daily wages, overtime payments and several other demands, said an official from the Myanmar Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The labour action spread to the Kya Lay garment factory on Tuesday, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to release the information. 

The workers, mostly women, staged protests outside the factories and inside a factory compound, where they sat down and refused to work. The three factories employ a total of about 3,600 workers. 

The official said factory owners and Labour Ministry officials were trying to settle the dispute, and some factories near those on strike had been closed to prevent the labour agitation from spreading. -- AP - Straits Times, 10/2/2010, Myanmar workers on strike