Well, the High Court awarded Widow RM490,000 in death in custody case - will there be an Appeal - will the appellate courts overturn this decision. We will have to wait and see...
Remember also some of the EAIC reccomendations
EAIC RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings as stated above, the Commission recommends the following:
1. DISCIPLINARY ACTION BY THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY OF PDRM AGAINST:
(i) The Deputy Head of the CID (Intelligence and Operation) of IPK Kuala Lumpur (SP60), Officer in-charge of D9 (SP27), Second Officer in-charge of D9 (SP39) and D9 Officer (SP44) for jointly or abetting in fabricating false information / misrepresentation of the entries in D9 Lock-up Station Diary (Exhibit P32) in relation to the fact surrounding the death of the deceased.
(ii) The Deputy Head of the CID (Intelligence and Operation) IPK Kuala Lumpur (SP60) and the two members of the Project Team (SP41 and SP43) for instructing the lock-up sentry personnel SP24 to tamper times in entries 3149 and 3150 of the the D9 Lock-up Station Diary (Exhibit P32).
(iii) The Deputy Head of the CID (Intelligence and Operation) IPK Kuala Lumpur (SP60) and Sergent Major Ali of D9 for jointly or abetting in making false police report (Exhibit P38) by using SP25 as the complainant of the report pertaining to the death of the deceased.
(iv) The Officer in-charge of D9 (SP27) and the Project Team Leader (SP44) for an abuse of power or position in instructing the re-arrest of the deceased on 21 May 2013 without any valid justification (Exhibit P50).
(v) The Officer in-charge of D9 (SP27) and Project Team Leader (SP44) for unreasonable delay in giving an access of family member to the deceased which has violated the provision of section 28A of the Criminal ProcedureCode.
(vi) The Officer in-charge of D9 (SP27) and Project Team Leader (SP44) for the failure to supervise the members of the Project Team (SP41,SP42 and SP43) in conducting prompt investigation / interrogation on the deceased which was only carried out on the seventh day (19 May 2013) of the remand.
(vii) The D9 Lock-up sentry personnel (SP24) for leaving the lock-up unattended between 2.30 p.m to 3.00 p.m on 21 May 2013.
(viii) The D9 Lock-up sentry personnel (SP25) for failure to station himself at the lock-up between 3.00 p.m to 4.30 p.m on 21 May 2013.- EAIC’S INVESTIGATION FINDINGS ON THE DEATH OF N. DHARMENDRAN IN POLICE CUSTODY
4 police officers(S. Hare Krishnan,
Jaffri Jaffar, Mohd Nahar Abd Rahman and Mohd Haswadi Zamri Shaari) were charged in court for the death of N Dharmendran BUT they were all acquitted by the High Court after trial - there was an apeal to the Court of Appeal, and then to the Federal Court - on 24/10/2018, it was reported that '...the Federal Court here upheld their acquittal...' - we may look at the Court Judgments later and discuss why prosecution failed - was it 'intentional' or due to incompetency or simply the availability of evidence needed (maybe because fellow police officers chose to 'protect' their fellow officers...or maybe because some of the evidence were tampered with ...or because we still do not have CCTV that records all that happens to arrestees or those in police custody...
Where are these 4 police officers - are they still in the police force? Where are the police officers that tampered with evidence >>> ALL should really be no longer in the Police, and should have been prosecuted in court...
The government(and HOME MInister) should really not be protecting the police - look what happened to the case of ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE of Pastor Koh and Amri...are they investigating the suspected police officers ...or are they trying to discredit SUHAKAM's Inquiry findings?
What happened to the Wang Kelian RCI report? Wang Kelian 'Death Camps' RCI Report was to be ready by September 2019 - Where is it? Make it public?
Where are these 4 police officers - are they still in the police force? Where are the police officers that tampered with evidence >>> ALL should really be no longer in the Police, and should have been prosecuted in court...
The government(and HOME MInister) should really not be protecting the police - look what happened to the case of ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE of Pastor Koh and Amri...are they investigating the suspected police officers ...or are they trying to discredit SUHAKAM's Inquiry findings?
What happened to the Wang Kelian RCI report? Wang Kelian 'Death Camps' RCI Report was to be ready by September 2019 - Where is it? Make it public?
Wang Kelian - An UMNO-BN government cover-up?The secrets of Wang Kelian exposed by investigative journalism?
Death in police custody is a SERIOUS CONCERN
- between 2000 and 2009, 147 died in police
lockup during the same period, revealed Home Minister Hishammuddin
Hussein today. -Malaysian police shot dead 279...and another 147 died in police lock-ups [2000-2009]
- 156 persons died in police custody between 2000 and
February 2011- Unabated Deaths in Custody — Will They Ever End? - Malaysian Bar
- six deaths in police custody was cited as having been
reported for the period of January to October 2019.This was lower than Suaram’s compilation in previous years of 2018
(eight deaths in police custody), 2017 (10), 2016 (15), and 2015 (12). - Deaths in Police Custody, Deaths in Immigration Custody, Deaths in Detention still exist in Malaysia...
See related posts:-
Dharmendran - dead in police custody - classified as murder - but apparently still no police officer arrested..
EAIC’S INVESTIGATION FINDINGS ON THE DEATH OF N. DHARMENDRAN IN POLICE CUSTODY
Unabated Deaths in Custody — Will They Ever End? - Malaysian Bar
Widow awarded RM490,000 in death in custody case
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today awarded Marry Mariay Susay,
whose husband N Dharmendran died in police custody in 2013, close to
half a million ringgit in damages.
The housewife had sued the police and the government in 2016 for
damages over assault, battery, breach of duty, negligence, false
imprisonment and conspiracy.
Dharmendran had been detained for alleged attempted murder involving firearms, and had been kept in the lock-up for 10 days.
Last year, the Federal Court affirmed the acquittal of four policemen implicated in his death.
In awarding the sum, High Court judge Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim said that
Marry had proven that police officers had assaulted her husband.
“She also proved that the assault had led to Dhamendran’s death,” he
said, adding that she had also proved that there was an attempt to cover
up the case.
Marry’s lawyer, N Surendran, said he was glad that Dhamendran’s widow got justice.
He said while it can never be a total consolation, “at least
Dhamendran’s family have some semblance of justice, particularly in
light of the fact that those charged with his murder had been
acquitted”.
He described their acquittal as a “failure in justice”.
Surendran also said that the court’s verdict today was a damning judgment.
“I think the home minister and police must address this judgment and
explain what they are going to do about the fact that there is something
wrong with the system that allows police officers to get away with
this,” he told reporters outside of court, adding that the defendants
were high-ranking officers.
He said that the verdict raised serious concerns as to how the police force was run, and that of accountability.
“I hope the home minister takes note and puts in immediate remedial steps.”
In 2016, the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) said
police had tortured Dhamendran before his death, including having his
ears stapled. - FMT, 10/12/2019
Federal Court upholds acquittal of four policemen in Dhamendran murder case
Nation
Wednesday, 24 Oct 2018 9:34 AM MYT
By Nurbaiti Hamdan
PUTRAJAYA: The four policemen implicated in the death of
N. Dharmendran, who died in police custody five years ago, remain free
men after the Federal Court here upheld their acquittal.
A five-man panel chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Zaharah Ibrahim made the unanimous decision here on Wednesday (Oct 24).
The apex court was satisfied that the Court of Appeal and the High Court did not err when they acquitted the four policemen and therefore dismissed the prosecution’s final appeal.
Justices Ramly Ali, Aziah Ali, Alizatul Khair Osman Khairuddin and Rohana Yusof also sat on the panel.
This is the fourth time that the policemen – S. Hare Krishnan,
Jaffri Jaffar, Mohd Nahar Abd Rahman and Mohd Haswadi Zamri Shaari –
have been acquitted by the courts.
According to lawyer Datuk Baljit Singh Sidhu, who represented Mohd Nahar and Mohd Haswadi, it was the apex court’s findings that the circumstantial evidence in the case was not met and that the evidence was incomplete.
The four men were charged with murdering Dharmendran, 32, at the D9 special investigation office, level 7, Kuala Lumpur Contingent Headquarters, Jalan Hang Tuah between May 18, 2013 and 4.30pm on May 21, 2013.
In November 2014, the four were acquitted of the charge by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, which ruled that the prosecution had failed to establish the charge against them.
However, they were ordered to enter their defence in February 2016 after the Court of Appeal ruled that there was sufficient evidence to try them.
In June the same year, the four were acquitted again.
The case was then brought for appeal before the Federal Court by the prosecution.
Hare Krishnan was represented by lawyer M. Athimulan, while Jaffri was represented by lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik.
According to news reports, Dhamendran was found dead in his cell while in police custody at the D9 Branch lock-up at the Kuala Lumpur Contingent Headquarters (IPK Kuala Lumpur) on May 21, 2013.
He had been arrested on May 11, 2013 on suspicion of attempted murder involving firearms and held under remand from May 12 that year until his death.
Based on the post-mortem conducted at the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital on May 22, 2013, the cause of death was determined to be from “diffused soft tissue injuries due to multiple blunt force trauma”.
A five-man panel chaired by Chief Judge of Malaya Zaharah Ibrahim made the unanimous decision here on Wednesday (Oct 24).
The apex court was satisfied that the Court of Appeal and the High Court did not err when they acquitted the four policemen and therefore dismissed the prosecution’s final appeal.
Justices Ramly Ali, Aziah Ali, Alizatul Khair Osman Khairuddin and Rohana Yusof also sat on the panel.
According to lawyer Datuk Baljit Singh Sidhu, who represented Mohd Nahar and Mohd Haswadi, it was the apex court’s findings that the circumstantial evidence in the case was not met and that the evidence was incomplete.
The four men were charged with murdering Dharmendran, 32, at the D9 special investigation office, level 7, Kuala Lumpur Contingent Headquarters, Jalan Hang Tuah between May 18, 2013 and 4.30pm on May 21, 2013.
In November 2014, the four were acquitted of the charge by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, which ruled that the prosecution had failed to establish the charge against them.
However, they were ordered to enter their defence in February 2016 after the Court of Appeal ruled that there was sufficient evidence to try them.
In June the same year, the four were acquitted again.
The case was then brought for appeal before the Federal Court by the prosecution.
Hare Krishnan was represented by lawyer M. Athimulan, while Jaffri was represented by lawyer Hisyam Teh Poh Teik.
According to news reports, Dhamendran was found dead in his cell while in police custody at the D9 Branch lock-up at the Kuala Lumpur Contingent Headquarters (IPK Kuala Lumpur) on May 21, 2013.
He had been arrested on May 11, 2013 on suspicion of attempted murder involving firearms and held under remand from May 12 that year until his death.
Based on the post-mortem conducted at the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital on May 22, 2013, the cause of death was determined to be from “diffused soft tissue injuries due to multiple blunt force trauma”.
No comments:
Post a Comment