Monday, May 27, 2024

PKR State Chiefs are chosen by President Anwar - not democratically by the State membership...or even the PKR's Majlis Pimpinan Pusat? Party Constitution indicates the government we will have if we elect them?

PKR names new State Chiefs - and interestingly the power of choosing and deciding State Chiefs rest with the PRESIDENT(now Anwar Ibrahim) only - odd, when really should it not be democratically elected by the members of the State or maybe the Branch or Division leaders of the State.

It is the President - not the PKR Central Leadership Council(Majlis Pimpinan Pusat).

Note that some are elected by members... but MANY are chosen by the President of PKR.

Anwar, PKR - Danger of becoming Autocratic and not Democratic? President just too much power?

By this appointment of State Chiefs, it also affects the composition of the Central Leadership Council - as the State Chiefs are also in the Central Leadership Council.

This rather undemocratic elements in party constitution is worrisome when the party is part of the government or forms the government.

 

We need to consider Party Constitutions, as it can be indicative of the kind of government we can be getting if we vote such a party into government. The constitution indicates the values and principles that a political party advocates - Democracy or ....

In brief, Anwar will be able to choose and insert 21 members of the Central Leadership Council. {See PKR Constitution at http://keadilanrakyat.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Perlembagaan-Parti-Keadilan-Rakyat.pdf

PKR Constitution provides for so many 'political appointments' by the party President (as seen in Clause 21.7 of the Party Constitution. In fact, even the Secretary General of PKR is a political appointment by the President - and that today is our Home Minister SENATOR Saifuddin Nasution Ismail. 

In Malaysia, political appointments(NOT democratic elections by the people) continue to happen in the Senate, Local Government(Local Council), Local Community Leaders(Ketua Kampung, etc) - When will Malaysians enjoy TRUE DEMOCRACY - the ability to freely elect our leaders at every level. Now, in Malaysia, democratic elections only for Members of Parliament(MPs) and State Assembly Persons(ADUNs). Local Government elections was there - but ended in late 60s because of an 'emergency' - but is yet to be restored despite the fact that when in Opposition, Anwar's PKR and DAP were all out for Local Council elections. 

Implementing local council elections is not a priority for the Housing and Local Government Ministry at the moment, the Dewan Rakyat was told.

Minister Nga Kor Ming said the focus was currently on developments that could benefit and uplift the people’s well-being.

“This year, we will also continue to prioritise basic facilities for local councils such as roads, clean public toilets and clear drains to ensure we give the best services to the people,” he said in a written Parliamentary reply on Friday (March 7).

Prime Minister Anwar seem to be avoiding the question of local government elections - just said discussing..

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today criticised the Opposition for fearmongering about local council elections, after it was brought up by federal government coalition member DAP recently.

The Pakatan Harapan (PH) chairman said the Malay community's position in the country is secure, and the group should instead be encouraged to reach greater heights rather than being held back with a siege mentality.

"We're only discussing it. Is it not even possible to discuss it? We're not even at the stage of deciding on it," Anwar told senior editors in a dialogue session in Seri Perdana Complex here, referring to the proposal to revive local council elections.

Remember, the people pay the Local Government lot of monies every year for houses and building within the boundaries of the Local Government. This monies are to be spend for the maintenance and development of the area within the vicinity of the Local Government. Now, because of the 'political appointment' by State for Local Governments within a State, and political appointments by Federal Government for Federal Territories - the power on how to use these monies inadvertently is with the State or Federal government, not the people. Who is responsible for the actions/decisions of the Local Government - it is the Local Government itself - but sadly how these monies are spend are difficult to know as most Local Government websites today do not disclose accounts, do they? WHY won't Anwar and the PH-led government allow local government elections? Why stick to the culture of 'political appointments' and not democratic elections.

Political parties must change their ways in favour of DEMOCRACY and end the culture of political appointments. The people in the area may have voted for the Opposition to be MPs and/or ADUNs but then the Local Government(Local Councils) representatives are chosen by the government that rules the State or the Federation - ODD is it not? Odd when the appointed Ketua Kampung is from PH when the overwhelming majority in the community supports PAS?

WHERE IS DEMOCRACY? Which political party will give us DEMOCRACY - true democracy so people in a kampung/taman/kampung baru and Local Government can choose their OWN people's representatives through FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS?

Even Thailand have local council (local government) elections. Shame on you, Malaysia.

Cambodia just finished their  municipal, provincial, town and district council elections

Local Council Elections - Increased DEMOCRACY? Why does PAS, UMNO, PKR, DAP,...oppose it? People choose?

Will PR allow people to elect their own Local Councillors? Civil Society Deadline for Local Council Elections:- '..by or before 2010..'

 

 

 

PKR names new state chiefs, Rafizi, Nik Nazmi and Sangkar dropped

FMT Reporters-

Mustapha Sakmud is Sabah PKR chief, replacing Sangkar Rasam, who has been appointed to the central leadership council.

4Rafizi-Nik Nazmi- Sangkar
(From left) Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad relinquish control of two states, while Sangkar Rasam joins the central leadership council.

PETALING JAYA: A slew of new state PKR chiefs were named today, with Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad relinquishing control of two states each, and a new leader in Sabah replacing Sangkar Rasam.

Rafizi, who is deputy president, has been replaced by Azman Abidin as federal territories PKR leader and Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh Azman as the Johor chief. Azman is the political secretary to Prime Minister and PKR president Anwar Ibrahim, while Syed Ibrahim is the Ledang MP.

Vice-president Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad was relieved of his position as Kelantan and Terengganu PKR chief, with the posts now going to Suparadi Noor and Ahmad Nazri Yusof, respectively.

In Sabah, deputy higher education minister Mustapha Sakmud replaces Sangkar, who was recently urged to step down by 15 of 26 division chiefs. He had rejected the demand, and Anwar later said he would intervene in the matter.

Sangkar has now been appointed to the central leadership council, along with former Indera Mahkota MP Azan Ismail and Roslan Hussin, listed in the statement as a training director.

Deputy domestic trade and cost of living minister Fuziah Salleh takes over from party vice-president Amirudin Shari as Pahang PKR chief, though Amirudin will continue to lead the Selangor chapter.

There were no changes to the other state leaderships.

In a statement, PKR information chief Fahmi Fadzil said the changes were decided by the party’s central leadership council.

He added that the top leadership also discussed the looming by-election for the Sungai Bakap state seat in Penang following the death of Nor Zamri Latiff of PAS on Friday. - FMT, 26/5/2024

Local council elections not a priority, focus is on development, says Nga


facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
telegram sharing button
linkedin sharing button
By Gerard Gimino
  • Nation
  • Friday, 08 Mar 2024

PETALING JAYA: Implementing local council elections is not a priority for the Housing and Local Government Ministry at the moment, the Dewan Rakyat was told.

Minister Nga Kor Ming said the focus was currently on developments that could benefit and uplift the people’s well-being.

“This year, we will also continue to prioritise basic facilities for local councils such as roads, clean public toilets and clear drains to ensure we give the best services to the people,” he said in a written Parliamentary reply on Friday (March 7).

Nga was responding to a question by Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan (PN-Kota Baru).

Takiyuddin had asked whether the government intended to carry out local council elections following “pressure” from certain quarters for it to begin in Kuala Lumpur.

Local council elections were previously carried out in Malaysia but were suspended in the 1960s following the Confrontation periods between Indonesia and Malaysia.

It has never been revived since.

Separately, Nga said the ministry would continue engagements with state governments to finalise the draft of the Residential Tenancy Act.

“Input and views from the engagement will be taken into account to improve the draft, so all quarters will be protected and taken into account,” he said.

Nga added that the Residential Tenancy Act would be neutral, with the rental of any premises being subject to agreement by the parties involved.

“It will also define the rights and obligations for premise owners and renters, alongside preparing a mechanism to resolve any conflicts when it comes to renting,” he said.

This was in response to a question by Syahredzan Johan (PH-Bangi) who asked about current developments on the Residential Tenancy Act, and whether it would overcome complaints of racial discrimination against potential renters. - Star, 8/3/2024

 

Cambodia's ruling party sweeps most votes in local council elections


facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
telegram sharing button
linkedin sharing button
  • Cambodia
  • Monday, 27 May 2024

The CPP won the most majority votes in the elections, gaining some 10,052 votes, or about 86 per cent of the total votes.

PHNOM PENH: The ruling Cambodian People's Party (CPP) on Sunday (May 26) won the most votes in the municipal, provincial, town and district council elections for the fourth term, according to preliminary results released by the National Election Committee (NEC).

Five political parties, namely the CPP, the Khmer Will Party, the Nation Power Party, the Funcinpec Party and the Khmer National United Party, took part in the non-universal elections.

The preliminary results, issued by the NEC and announced one polling station by one polling station on the state-run TVK, showed that the CPP received most of the votes in the elections.

NEC's Chairman Prach Chan said 11,598 sitting commune chiefs and councillors, or 99.79 per cent of the 11,622 eligible voters, cast their ballots for 4,200 municipal, provincial, town and district councilors on Sunday.

"The elections were conducted smoothly with good security and order, and without any violence or intimidation," he said in a press conference at the conclusion of the elections.

"The elections were held in a free and fair manner based on the principle of liberal multi-party democracy," Chan added.

CPP's spokesperson Sok Eysan confirmed with Xinhua that based on the party's tally, the CPP won the most majority votes in the elections, gaining some 10,052 votes, or about 86 per cent of the total votes.

"This is another great success for the CPP after we won a landslide victory in the senate election in February 2024 and the general election in July 2023," he said.

According to the NEC, the official results will be publicised on June 8.

The municipal, provincial, town and district council elections are held once every five years. - Xinhua

DAP's Aziz Bari: Malays will benefit from local govt election if done properly

DAP's Aziz Bari: Malays will benefit from local govt election if done properly
DAP’s Tebing Tinggi assemblyman Abdul Aziz Bari said local government elections was a way to address grassroots complaints about matters affecting their daily lives. — Picture by Farhan Najib

KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 19 — Amid renewed protests against the proposal to reinstate local government elections, Perak DAP leader Abdul Aziz Bari said that the Malays will not lose power as feared and might even benefit from the move.

Malaysiakini reported Aziz as saying that Malay leaders who issued statements against the idea after it was recently proposed by Federal Territories DAP chairman Tan Kok Wai, should stop scaring the Malays with such fear.

“If it is properly done, the Malays may benefit from the local election instead of losing power.

“States like Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis may see Malay-dominated local councils, such may also be the scenario even in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur,” he was quoted saying.

Advertisement

Aziz, a constitutional law expert, was responding to Umno supreme council member Lokman Noor Adam and Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu) youth chief Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal over their comments on the matter.

The Tebung Tinggi assemblyman said that both the Malay politicians were against the reinstatement of local government elections based on their assumptions that everybody votes along racial lines.

“It’s time for them to wake up rather than be stuck in the past,” he reportedly said.

Aziz said that contrary to claims that local government elections are DAP’s way of consolidating its dominance in urban areas, the move was a way to address grassroots complaints about matters affecting their daily lives.

He also recalled that the first general election in 1955 had its roots in the Kuala Lumpur municipal council election held three years earlier.

“Both of them (Lokman and Wan Ahmad Fayhsal) who were born after independence should study more about the subject.

“The fact that the older generation like me and Tan who is in his 70s is concerned about democratisation, while the younger generation is stuck in the past,” he explained.

Malaysia last held a local council elections in 1963. However, the next round, which was supposed to be held the following year, was temporarily suspended.

The temporary suspension became permanent in 1976 when Parliament passed the Local Government Act which abolished local government elections and provided for the appointment of local councillors.

In any case, Aziz pointed out that the proposed local government election would be subject to certain limitations.

He reminded Lokman and Wan Ahmad Fayhsal that they too are also welcome to take part in the consultative process to enact such laws.

Malaysiakini also reported former federal territories minister Khalid Abdul Samad calling for Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders to discuss the DAP-backed proposal so they can decide on the coalition’s stand.

The Parti Amanah Negara (Amanah) leader also remarked that all levels of elections, including any move to revive the local council election, will be used as a platform for “race politics”.

“At the moment, priority should be put on showing the unity of the government, and as such I would suggest these issues be discussed internally within the coalition first, not being brought up in the open by individual parties, which will show differences and cause a split.

“So in terms of wisdom, discuss internally first, hear all arguments. When a decision is made, decide what to do in the event the decision is not in line with your party’s stand,” Khalid was quoted as saying.

The former Shah Alam MP also noted that while calling for the local government election to start in Kuala Lumpur, there are no positions for local councillors under the Kuala Lumpur City Hall’s structure.

At present, Kuala Lumpur only has MPs, and the federal government runs Kuala Lumpur City Hall.

“What I’m trying to say is, a lot needs to be done structurally too. Not just the local council election,” khalid was quoted saying.

Tan, an eight-term Cheras MP, had recently called for the government to reinstate the local elections in the capital city. His proposal came after the recent cabinet reshuffle that saw the appointment of a minister in charge of Federal Territories.

Yesterday, newly appointed Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Federal Territories) Dr Zaliha Mustafa said there are more basic matters that need to be prioritised including governance of strata properties, instead of discussions on reintroducing the local council election. - Malay Mail, 19/12/2023

 

Sunday, May 26, 2024

Senators independently choose the President of the Senate - not the Prime Minister...not the party leaderships...not the Cabinet?

It is the Senators themselves who pick the President and the Deputy President of Senate - not Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim or the political party leaders.

If Senators cannot decide on their OWN as to who will be the President and Deputy President of Senate, then they should simply RESIGN. 

Senators are supposed to be INDEPENDENT after they are appointed as Senators - they are no more just doing what their Party orders them, or the Prime Minister or State leaders tells them. 

Remember, Parliament, that includes the SENATE, are supposed to be the check and balance - to monitor the Prime Minister and the Cabinet(EXECUTIVE) - so, if Anwar still decides on who is President and/or Deputy President..

President and Deputy President of Senate
56. (1) the Senate shall from time to time choose one of its members to be yang di-pertua Dewan negara (president of the Senate) and one to be Deputy president of the Senate, and shall, subject to Clause (3), transact no business while the office of president is vacant other than the election of a president.

There is already a problem with the APPOINTMENT of Senators - by the State, and at the Federal level by the King acting on the advice of the Prime Minister. The PM chooses the Federal Senators.

It is time for the abolition of appointment, and for the direct election of Senators by the people. It is provided for in Article 45(4) of the Federal Constitution

(4) parliament may by law—
(a) increase to three the number of members to be elected for each State;
(b) provide that the members to be elected for each State shall be so elected by the direct vote of the electors of that State;
(c) decrease the number of appointed members or abolish appointed members.
BN regime may have started this practice/policy - but now we have a government led by Pakatan Harapan that promised 'REFORMS".

So, why is the Anwar's Cabinet still involved in deciding who is the Senate President - the Senators themselves should choose,

End dictatorship of the EXECUTIVE - and let's be a TRUE Democracy.

The candidate for the next Dewan Negara president will be discussed tomorrow with the Sarawak top leadership, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim

Last week, Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil said the government would make an announcement on the appointment for Dewan Negara president in the near future.Fahmi said the cabinet had discussed the matter and had decided on the name for the next Dewan Negara president.

"The cabinet discussed on the matter in the meeting today and we have the name for the Dewan Negara president

And, there should not be an issue of QUOTA when it comes to deciding who will be Senate President...the BEST Senator will be chosen by his/her fellow Senators.

"The quota for the (Dewan Negara) president's position has been given to the government's counterparts in Sabah and Sarawak."
Remember that the President and Deputy President of the Senate has a lot of power - they can even decide on the agenda(changes in the agenda). They decide on which of the Senators who have their hands raised get a chance to speak. So, a pro-government of the day chair of the Senate meeting can prevent good points that may be coming from Senators from Opposition parties.

Where is the REFORM? Has PH just become another BN?

When it comes to Senators, those who contested Parliamentary elections and lost [rejected by the people] should never be appointed as SENATORS as this is a clear indication of the wishes of the people.

Sadly, our current Home Minister is such a case - He stood for elections and lost during GE15, and then was made Senator and Anwar chose him to have the powerful position of Home Minister... 

see some earlier posts:

Restore Right to Democratically Elect Peoples’ Representatives through Free and Fair Elections for True and Effective People’s Participation in all levels of Government including the Local Community Level, Local Government (Council) and the Senate (16 Groups)

Senate - Problems with a majority UMNO-BN appointed Senators, and the REFORMS needed?

PM to discuss Dewan Negara president vacancy with Sarawak top leaders tomorrow

KUALA LUMPUR: The candidate for the next Dewan Negara president will be discussed tomorrow with the Sarawak top leadership, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

In a press conference held during the Postnormal Times Madani Exhibition today, Anwar said the matter will be discussed during his visit to Sarawak tomorrow.

"We will discuss with the party leadership (in Sarawak), this is as two (senate presidents) ended their positions before their due date.

"(Hence,) God Willing I will discuss the matter tomorrow, (as) I will be going to Sarawak)," he said.- NST, 26/5/2024
 

Sabah, Sarawak ex-lawmakers among top nominees for Dewan Negara president

KUALA LUMPUR: Several individuals, including politicians from Sarawak and Sabah, have been tipped for the position of Dewan Negara president ahead of the upcoming parliamentary sitting.

The position became vacant last month following the appointment of Tun Dr Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar as the eight Sarawak Yang di-Pertua Negeri on Jan 26, replacing Tun Abdul Taib Mahmud.

It is understood that the announcement on the appointment of the new Dewan Negara president was expected to be made on Feb 19.

Sources say among the names rumoured to fill the vacancy are former Bukit Mas member of parliament Datuk Mutang Tagal and former foreign minister Tan Sri Anifah Aman.

"The quota for the (Dewan Negara) president's position has been given to the government's counterparts in Sabah and Sarawak."

However, speculation is rife that Mutang is the top pick for the next president of the Upper House.

Mutang was Bukit Mas MP (now renamed Lawas) from 1982 to 1990, having served the constituency for two terms. He holds a Bachelor's Degree in Law from Universiti Malaya.

Anifah served as Beaufort MP from 1999 to 2004, and as Kimanis MP from 2004 to 2013, and holds a Bachelor's Degree in Philosophy, Economics and Law from Buckingham University.

Mutang and Anifah, however, could not be reached to confirm the matter.

Previously, an online portal reported that a former Sarawak MP who served from 1982 to 1990 has been tipped to be appointed as the next Dewan Negara president.

It was learnt that the individual with a legal background had also received the appointment letter, but is waiting for the official announcement on Feb 19.

Last week, Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil said the government would make an announcement on the appointment for Dewan Negara president in the near future.

Fahmi said the cabinet had discussed the matter and had decided on the name for the next Dewan Negara president.- NST, 12/2/2024

Govt to announce new Dewan Negara president soon

PUTRAJAYA: The government will announce the new Dewan Negara president soon, following the appointment of Tan Sri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar as the eighth Sarawak governor.

Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil said the announcement will be made by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim before the Upper House sits next month.

"The cabinet discussed on the matter in the meeting today and we have the name for the Dewan Negara president.

"I also believe that it will be announced in the nearest time," he said at a press conference held after the cabinet meeting today. - NST, 7/2/2024

Parliament, not Prime Minister, must decide on Malaysia's stance on the Palestine issue - after PM Anwar allowed those who supply arms to Israel to participate in exhibition in Malaysia?

Malaysia needs to CLARIFY and reaffirm its position on Palestine

* Our current position is that we are against the Zionist regime of Israel, and as such Malaysia does not have diplomatic relations with Israel. We are not ordinary citizens of Israel - many of whom are against what their government is doing to Palestine and Palestinians.

* Malaysia also do not have any economic-financial relationship with Israel - We have even recently barred the entry of any Israeli ships

* As a sign of protest, many in Malaysia are also BOYCOTTING Brands that support or have dealings with Israel and/or nations who support Israel - as a sign of solidarity with Palestinians and for a peace in the region.

* Malaysia is for the 3-State Solution, as per the UN Resolution 1947 - Israel, Palestine and an independently governed Jerusalem. This means that Israel must withdraw back to its borders as per the UN 1947 Plan. {Here, Malaysia is confused - because sometimes our government talks about 2-State solution, and talks about the 1967 borders which includes territories Israel occupied after wars. At best, we should demand a return to the 1947 Borders??]

Palestine - The UN created the problem without prior consultation of the inhabitants, causing the refugee problem since 1947, and now still denies Palestine UN membership?

* Malaysia should advocate for the UN to recognize the State of Palestine - full membership

* Malaysia should take a position of no business/economic agreements with Israel or pro-Zionist companies. Here there is concern with MAHB... - the possibility that pro-Israel companies will have a state in Malaysia's airports?? Anwar says it is a baseless allegations - but sadly as usual, he fails to deal with specifics - Is GIP owned by BlackRock? Remember, after the deal, shareholders of GIP can also change and maybe some Israeli company may become the biggest shareholder - is there any provision that prevents the possibility that Israeli companies may end up owning Malaysian airports. Will the agreement be nullified automatically later if say GIP is taken over in the future by Israeli companies or shareholders? 

Politically, the possible involvement of the New York-based GIP in the takeover has drawn accusations, by Opposition lawmakers and civil society groups, that the government is indirectly supporting Israel.

GIP is owned by BlackRock, reported as the world’s biggest asset manager with huge investments directly in Israel.

Among companies the fund invests in are Lockheed Martin, RTX, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and General Dynamics — firms that are said to manufacture weapons and vehicles that are used in Israel’s brutal military campaign against Palestinians.

* But then,when Malaysia allowed companies that sell/supply arms to Israel to come to Malaysia and participate in an exhibition, and not be immediately expelled when this fact was highlighted, Malaysia's strong position on Palestine 'crumbled'...

Hypocritical - Allowing Arm Suppliers to Israel to participate in Exhibition in Malaysia? Minister decide not to act - but leaves it to organisers - so different from Good Vibes Festival reaction?

Then, Anwar tells US to halt weapons supply - It makes no sense when Malaysia just hosted some of these companies that sell/supply arms to Israel. It is companies that sell/supply arms - not countries - so, Malaysia should have taken POSITIVE ACTION of immediately asking these arm supplier companies to leave Malaysia, when the government became aware. But then, it is ODD that the government did not know that Israeli arm suppliers will be at the exhibition.

There needs to be clarification as to whether Malaysia has any agreements with companies that sell arms to Israel or not. 

This is troubling times for Palestine as 

At least 35,857 people killed and 80,293 wounded in Israel's war on Gaza since October 7.

What is Malaysia's position - it is BEST that this matter be decided by PARLIAMENT, for leaving it to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and his Cabinet alone is dangerous- more so since the government allowed arm suppliers to Israel to participate in an exhibition in Malaysia recently ...

When it comes to sports or even professors being invited to speak, the fact that they are from Israel or support Israel is not a big deal - BUT not arm supplying companies whereby the weapons they supply are used to kill Palestinians and cause destruction...

On this issue of Palestine - Malaysia can not just pass a MOTION in Parliament, but can also enact a LAW ...

It is OK to privatize airlines, and let foreign companies or shareholders in >> but it is different when we are talking about AIRPORTS (Do we want to pass on ownership/control to private companies, even foreign companies and shareholders). Airports,Ports,etc should be in the hands of the government or government controlled companies in my opinion. So, we really need to see what is happening to MAHB..  

See also:

Academic Freedom and Students' Rights, Prof Gilley's views - criticize if we do not agree, BUT no to Prior Government Approval for Speakers invited to talk in Universities/Schools? 

Muhyidin's statement on Palestine is not sufficient to address 'forced eviction' of Palestinians, illegal settlement of Israelis and other fundamental issues?

Palestinian Issue - Independence? 2-State Solution? British created problem? UN membership?

GAZA : An understanding of history helps - Boycott good way to express ourself

Palestine - Anwar reveals US 'demarche' - so any other pressure from other States? Did Malaysia send protest notes to US, and other countries?

Palestinian Crisis - Forgotten with the ceasefire? Fundamental HR violations in Palestine and the UN? Free and Fair Elections? Democracy?

PALESTINE - Speedy resolution for a people who have been 'oppressed' since World War 1 - End Occupation.

Anwar tells US to halt weapon supply to Israel, use influence to end hostilities in Palestine

KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is calling for the United States to take all necessary steps to stop the atrocities in Palestine.

In a talk show, 'Talk To Al Jazeera', aired early this morning, Anwar said this included stopping the supply of weapons to Israel.

"They (the US) should do whatever is necessary to stop the hostilities, that includes not only (supplying) weapons but also they have the influence, mechanism and diplomatic skills.

"It's just impossible to imagine that one man, (Israel Prime Minister) Benjamin Netanyahu, can dictate the affairs of the world."

He said he is in "no position to deny" that the US was complicit in the war crimes committed by Israel towards the Palestinians.

"The facts are evident. Knowing that atrocities are being committed, whether they are an ally, friend, or nation that has an axis with you; you cannot condone this.

"Otherwise, you have no moral stature or standing in the world to talk about international relations, humanity, or even order and human rights," he said.

Anwar said the international community had made it "abundantly clear" that authorities in the US should do whatever it can to allow complete cessations of hostilities and stop the war.

He said while countries in the west, including the US, continue to champion human rights, their non-action on the attacks by Israel in Palestine was contrary to their rhetoric.

"That's why we see that sometimes most countries in the west seem to be quite hypocritical.

"Between their lectures on human rights and democracy, at the same time (they are) condoning, if not tolerating these obvious atrocities against an innocent population."

Anwar also said he had expressed his stance on Israel during the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) Leaders' Meeting last year, where he had appealed to the US to call for an immediate ceasefire.

He did so in front of US President Joe Biden, during an Apec informal meet and working lunch on Nov 17, and said Biden was listening "very attentively" to his calls.

However, Anwar revealed that there had never been any response following his speech.

"I was addressing (the US) as a friend, as an important ally of Malaysia, who has been in that position for decades.

"You cannot deny that I feel disappointed, not out of interest of my personal position or Malaysia, but because you cannot bear to see daily atrocities inflicted on women and children. It's just atrocious."

Anwar also said no one in "their right mind" could deny the fact that Israel was trying to conduct ethnic cleansing towards the Palestinian people.

"Look at the casualties, the devastation, giving no opportunity for anyone, women, children, elderly to survive. What other terms are applicable?" he questioned.

Meanwhile, Anwar said the people had a right to respond, and demand for independence and freedom in their fight against colonisation.

He said Israel had committed atrocities against Palestinians long before Oct 7, starting with the Nakba or Great Catastrophe in 1948, followed by continued annexation and colonisation.

"How do countries expect to accept the fact that in this day and age, for whatever reason, countries are being colonised, and don't expect a resistance, whether civil or armed?

"The ANC (African National Congress), the IRA (Irish Republican Army)... look at all the experience of these countries."

When asked if he saw Israel as a colonial apartheid state, he replied in the affirmative.

"Clearly… how do you explain their actions against the Palestinians and the fact that they continue to control lands that belong to the Palestinian people?"

Anwar also recognised that it was against international humanitarian law to attack and take captive Israeli children and civilians.

"Yes I think we remain consistent, that's where we differ with the west. But we then question, why don't you (the west) condemn and do whatever is necessary to stop atrocities to others?" - NST, 19/5/2024

 

What’s behind the controversy of MAHB’s Khazanah-EPF takeover, and what does Israel have to do with it?

What’s behind the controversy of MAHB’s Khazanah-EPF takeover, and what does Israel have to do with it?
Palestine Solidarity Secretariat (SSP) spokesman Chua Tian Chang or Tian Chua speaks to the media about a memorandum opposing the proposed takeover of Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB). The SSP had earlier today demonstrated in front of the Transport Ministry in Putrajaya over MAHB’s takeover proposal. Perikatan Nasional’s (PN) Machang MP Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal led the protest. — Picture from Facebook/Wan Ahmad Fayhsal

KUALA LUMPUR, May 24 — Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd confirmed last week a takeover offer from a consortium led by its major shareholders Khazanah Nasional Bhd and the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), a deal reportedly valued at over RM12 billion.

Rumours about the privatisation had floated for months before the country’s biggest airport operator made the offer public through a filing with Bursa Malaysia on Wednesday. The confirmation was both welcomed and criticised.

Some economists suggested privatisation could bolster Malaysian airports’ competitiveness after lagging behind their regional competitors for so long. Opposition lawmakers, however, were more critical although not necessarily about the privatisation proposal itself.

Yesterday, Perikatan Nasional’s (PN) MP Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal even joined a protest in front of the Ministry of Transport over the move, organised by activist group Palestine Solidarity Secretariat (SSP).

Malay Mail explains why the news about MAHB’s takeover has fuelled keen and critical interest.

Rumours about the privatisation had floated for months before the country’s biggest airport operator made the offer public through a filing with Bursa Malaysia on Wednesday. The confirmation was both welcomed and criticised. — Picture by Shafwan Zaidon

Who plans to take over MAHB?

MAHB is currently a listed company with government-linked investment firms Khazanah and EPF among its biggest shareholders.

The two institutional investors own a 33.2 per cent stake and a 7.9 per cent stake in the company respectively but have expressed interest in raising their stakes in a proposal that entails a takeover through a consortium that includes two other funds: Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (Adia).

New York-headquartered GIP is a leading infrastructure investor that specialises in investing in owning and operating some of the largest and most complex assets across the energy, transport, digital infrastructure as well as the water and waste management sectors.

If the deal goes through, the consortium — dubbed as the Gateway Development Alliance Sdn Bhd (GDA) — will own up to 67.1 per cent of MAHB’s shares, with Khazanah and EPF holding a 40 per cent and 30 per cent stake in the consortium respectively.

The remaining 30 per cent will be held by GIP and Adia through a joint venture (JV) company called GIP Aurea Pte Ltd, a joint venture.

Financial newspaper The Edge reported that GIP will effectively hold a 25 per cent stake in MAHB should the takeover take place, since it owns up to 80 per cent of the JV. Adia will only have a 5 per cent effective stake, it wrote.

Putra Business School’s Master of Business Administration programme director, Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff, reportedly suggested that the move reflects a growing confidence, especially by foreign investors in local companies’ financial and growth potential.

Signs carried by protestors during the demonstration in front of the Transport Ministry in Putrajaya over MAHB’s takeover proposal. — Picture from Facebook/Wan Ahmad Fayhsal

Why privatise MAHB?

In the Bursa Malaysia filing of the takeover offer, the consortium said it wants to upgrade and modernise the company’s operations, enhance passenger service, improve airline connectivity and stimulate traffic growth.

“All of these will help unlock the potential of Malaysia’s airport network, and drive the continued development of the Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen [International Airport] in Türkiye,” it said, adding that privatisation is the best way to achieve it.

Services at the country's major airports, including the Kuala Lumpur International Airport, have come under some criticism, and users have long demanded improvement.

Connectivity is also an issue. Compared to Singapore’s Changi and Thailand’s Suvarnabhumi, which scored 102.1 and 89.1 for connectivity, KLIA only has a connectivity rate of 59.9, according to Mavcom’s 2023 review.

An economist from Universiti Kuala Lumpur’s Malaysian Institute of Aviation Technology — Mohd Harridon Mohamed Suffian — was quoted saying the privatisation would significantly ease the pressure on the government’s financial coffers, as the airport operator would not be fully dependent on the government to finance its operational activities and capital expenditures.

MAHB is currently a listed company with government-linked investment firms Khazanah and EPF among its biggest shareholders. The two institutional investors own a 33.2 per cent stake and a 7.9 per cent stake in the company respectively but have expressed interest in raising their stakes in a proposal that entails a takeover through a consortium that includes two other funds: Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (Adia). — Picture by Firdaus Latif

What makes the deal controversial?

Politically, the possible involvement of the New York-based GIP in the takeover has drawn accusations, by Opposition lawmakers and civil society groups, that the government is indirectly supporting Israel.

GIP is owned by BlackRock, reported as the world’s biggest asset manager with huge investments directly in Israel.

Among companies the fund invests in are Lockheed Martin, RTX, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and General Dynamics — firms that are said to manufacture weapons and vehicles that are used in Israel’s brutal military campaign against Palestinians.

From a business angle, the privatisation bid has sparked concerns about the potential lack of oversight.

Emmanuel Samarathisa, a business journalist, said privatising MAHB could keep the public in the dark about shady decisions taken to manage one of the country’s most strategic assets. This may include a change in ownership, divestment or possibly “carved-outs” whereby a “private entity” could be given a lucrative contract to manage one of the MAHB-owned airports.

Transport Minister Anthony Loke, who was accused of misleading Parliament because he said GIP’s involvement in the privatisation bid is merely an ‘assumption’, said MAHB’s takeover could fast-track ‘strategic decisions’ that could boost MAHB’s performance, a view supported by several free-market thinking economists. — Picture by Shafwan Zaidon

What is the official response so far?

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim issued a stern response to claims that a pro-Zionist fund would own a stake in MAHB if the privatisation bid goes through, calling it a “baseless” allegation aimed at inciting anger towards his government. It’s unclear if Anwar’s denial referred to GIP’s involvement in the consortium or the claim that GIP is a “pro-Zionist” fund.

“...there is nothing positive from them, only inciting hatred and envy. All of our statements that have been recognised by the world, including the meeting with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, do not bring anything positive to them, what is sought is slander and incitement," he was reported saying in Kazakhstan during an official visit last week.

Transport Minister Anthony Loke, who was accused of misleading Parliament because he said GIP’s involvement in the privatisation bid is merely an “assumption”, said MAHB’s takeover could fast-track “strategic decisions” that could boost MAHB’s performance, a view supported by several free-market thinking economists.

Loke said he merely responded to the information presented by Machang MP Wan Ahmad Fayhsal that MAHB was to be sold to Global Infrastructures Partners, a logistics investment fund owned by one of the world’s biggest asset managers, Blackrock, which he said was inaccurate.

Wan Ahmad Fayhsal has since filed a motion to refer Loke to Parliament’s Rights and Privileges Committee after claiming the latter had misled the Dewan Rakyat. The notice of motion was submitted this week to Dewan Rakyat secretary Nizam Mydin Bacha Mydin.

In response to SSP’s protest, Loke said the group should instead direct its grievance to Khazanah and EPF over the matter since the ministry is a regulator and has no control over MAHB’s choice to cooperate with any joint venture.

Some economists suggested privatisation could bolster Malaysian airports’ competitiveness after lagging behind their regional competitors for so long. Opposition lawmakers, however, were more critical although not necessarily about the privatisation proposal itself. — Picture by Devan Manuel

Tuesday, May 21, 2024

Death In Police Custody - Cover-Up, Highly Suspicious Timestamps of CCTV footage,...post-death log entries, mandatory health check-ups -

Death In Police Custody  - it is almost impossible for anyone in police detention to commit suicide, as detainees in police lock-ups are monitored 24 hours a day. Then, there is discrepancy with CCTV recordings...

Anand said the timestamps of the CCTV footage were highly suspicious, with a discrepancy of 25 to 30 minutes.

“The footage should have been monitored by the duty policeman in charge. But here there are just small screens hung up on the ceiling, serving just as a playback device. It is shocking.”

He also noted that a logbook for lock-up patrols contained an entry claiming that a patrol was made coinciding with the time of Fadzrin’s death.

“In the logbook, a remark saying ‘buat rondaan’ (patrol) was added at the time of the deceased’s death. It is highly suspicious as it was the only entry of such nature. It is a cover-up, taking advantage of the discrepancy in CCTV timestamps,” he said.

Causing death by negligence is a CRIME in Malaysia - Will the relevant police officers be charged and tried in court >> Or will this be yet another criminal case involving police officers that will be 'covered-up'?

In February 2024, there was another death in custody - where the police FAILED to take a detainee to hospital

 ...Hidayat complained to the officers on duty that he was not well, and that he had also vomited.

The officers gave him a Panadol to ease his pain. Hidayat died the following day.

HR Groups have called for MANDATORY health checks of all detainees in police lock-ups - this is to prevent DEATHS in Custody. Some detainees need to take regular medication - like for patients suffering from Diabetes, High Blood Pressure. Pre-arrest or arrest violence can also result in detainees dying -

Groups have also called for CCTV with recording capabilities, that could not be tampered. In the past, during inquest, it is not uncommon to be informed that CCTV was not working, or that there is no CCTV. There were also live CCTV that is meant to be continuously monitored by police officers from their desk - but the problem is that the police officer is negligently absent ...

In the earlier case, the police officer is expected to regularly patrol the lock-ups - but alas, it seems that they did not - a remark saying ‘buat rondaan’ (patrol) was added at the time of the deceased’s death.

Should not such police officers be CHARGED in court for the crimes, even if it is by reason of Negligence?

Would it not be best that AUTOPSY is conducted for all deaths in custody - so we can be clearer as to the actual cause of death. Non-performance of autopsy presumes an  attempt to cover up the REAL cause of death.

In Malaysia, very few take cases of death in custody to court - so, we will not know the TRUTH.

Everyone can make a mistake even the CORONER - how could he be so sure that it was suicide? Why did he not impose criminal liability to the police for even 'suicides' as it is almost impossible for detainees, being continuously monitored by police to prepare or even commit suicide???

Back to preservation of CCTV records - should it not be done by someone, other than the police?

See earlier posts:- 

Body Cams NOW, not in 2025 or 2026, for all Law Enforcement Officers to curb corruption, abuse of power and violation of rights Explain Delay and Why Mindwave Consultancy Sdn Bhd given the contract? (MADPET)

Death in POLICE CUSTODY - we need the Coroner's Report 'confirming' police did not KILL?

2022 2nd Death in Police Custody(16th Jan) - Pengkalan Chepa. Coroner - Tell us how he died?

If proper procedure followed, 63 year old accused will be alive today, and not died in a police lock-up

3rd Death in Police Custody in 2022 - at this rate, for 2022 we will get 36? All police lockups have CCTV by end 2021

7th Death in Police Custody in 2022 - like Covid, the number of cases in police custody are sky-rocketing this year? Other deaths in custody????

6th Death in Police Custody of 2022 > Has the Coroner(the Sessions Court Judge) already viewed the body, at site of death, started investigation? 

Contempt Proceedings Against Home Minister and Others for failure to complete inquest in death in custody cases as directed by the Judiciary?

16th Death In Police Custody in 2022, and disclosure of Coroner’s investigation and status of reform implementation to reduce deaths, and facilitate investigation needed..(MADPET)




Court finds police negligent over man’s death in custody
Story by Predeep Nambiar • 1d • 3 min read


Fadhelah Othman says she is happy with the court’s verdict but continues to grieve over her son’s death.© Provided by Free Malaysia Today

GEORGE TOWN: The High Court here has ruled that the death of a detainee at a Penang police lock-up five years ago was due to negligence by the police, who failed to prevent his suicide.

In finding the police and the government liable, the court ordered them to pay RM197,600 in damages and costs to the family of Fadzrin Zaidi, 29.

Justice Anand Ponnudurai said the police had breached the duty of care owed to Fadzrin, a gravedigger, by failing to carry out regular patrols which could have prevented his death.

He said such patrols were a requirement under the 1953 Lock-Up Rules.

“The defendants owed a duty of care and it is wrong to say Fadzrin was not a suicide risk. Under the lock-up rules, that risk should have been assessed through a mandatory health check,” he said.

Fadzrin was detained during a drug raid in 2019 and found dead in his cell at the Kepala Batas police station two days later. His death certificate stated that the cause of death was “consistent with hanging”.

A coroner previously ruled that he had committed suicide, citing CCTV footage and testimony from nine witnesses. His mother, Fadhelah Othman, later sued the police and government for negligence.

Footage from an inquest showed Fadzrin wandering in his cell while his cellmates slept at 1.05am before he hanged himself at 1.51am. Paramedics pronounced him dead at 2.55am.

Anand said the timestamps of the CCTV footage were highly suspicious, with a discrepancy of 25 to 30 minutes.

“The footage should have been monitored by the duty policeman in charge. But here there are just small screens hung up on the ceiling, serving just as a playback device. It is shocking.”

He also noted that a logbook for lock-up patrols contained an entry claiming that a patrol was made coinciding with the time of Fadzrin’s death.

“In the logbook, a remark saying ‘buat rondaan’ (patrol) was added at the time of the deceased’s death. It is highly suspicious as it was the only entry of such nature. It is a cover-up, taking advantage of the discrepancy in CCTV timestamps,” he said.


The judge also found the government, as the employer of the police force, vicariously liable for negligence.

He ordered Putrajaya to pay RM57,600 in dependency costs, RM30,000 in bereavement costs, RM50,000 in aggravated damages, special damages of RM10,000 and costs of RM50,000 to Fadhelah.

Fadhelah told reporters outside the courtroom she was happy with the verdict but still grieving over her son’s death.

“My husband passed away heartbroken over our son’s death,” she added.

Lawyers M Visvanathan, V Sanjay Nathan and V Pushan Qin Nathan appeared for the family. Senior federal counsel Nur Ezdiani Roleb and federal counsel Syafiq Affandy Hasan appeared for the police and the government.

Coroner Norsalha Hamzah previously found that Fadzrin had wanted to take his own life, based on video footage shown in court.

She said there were no criminal elements leading to his death, and that Fadzrin was likely “ashamed to have been caught by police as he was about to get married soon”. - FMT, 20/5/2024



Court holds police responsible for construction worker’s death in custody
Story by FMT Reporters • 3mo • 1 min read



Hidayat Abdul Halim’s brother Faiz (second from right) and representatives from NGOs Suaram and Gegar submitted a memorandum to the AGC requesting an inquest into Hidayat’s death in this 2021 file photo.© Provided by Free Malaysia Today

PETALING JAYA: The Kuantan coroner’s court has ruled that the police were responsible for the death of a detainee at the Pekan police station three years ago.

Construction worker Hidayat Abdul Halim was arrested by police at his home on Oct 8, 2021, after allegedly consuming drugs.

He was taken to the Pekan police station and died 48 hours later. He is survived by his wife and six children.

An inquest was held to determine Hidayat’s death, with coroner Ahmad Zamzani Zain finding that Hidayat died of internal bleeding in his brain.

Ahmad Zamzani added that Hidayat’s death could have been prevented if the police had taken him to seek medical treatment.

During the proceedings, the court heard that Hidayat complained to the officers on duty that he was not well, and that he had also vomited.

The officers gave him a Panadol to ease his pain. Hidayat died the following day.


His family contended that the officers in charge should have consulted their supervisors on what to do when a detainee fell sick.

Lawyers Haijan Omar and Nik Zarith Nik Moustapha held a watching brief for Hidayat’s family while deputy public prosecutor Syarifah Nursyuhada Tuan Mat was the inquest conducting officer. - FMT,. 7/2/2024

Should Fadhlina Sidek remain Education Minister, when she considers Zahid Hamidi her 'role model' and/or 'teacher'?

Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek showered praise on Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, calling him one of her “teachers”.

Malaysia's Education Minister considers Zahid Hamidi a 'role model'...a 'teacher', and this makes one very worried... of the suitability of Fadhlina to remain as EDUCATION Minister responsible for the education of children in Malaysia...

Let us not forget that Zahid Hamidi - Prosecution had already proved a PRIMA FACIE case of 47 charges - this means, he will definitely be convicted and sentenced unless he is able to raise 'reasonable doubt' during the defence case, which he already failed to do in cross-examination of the prosecution witness. A rather hard place to be.... The fact that the Public Prosecutor discontinued his criminal case does not change the fact. {For me, if Zahid Hamidi is not guilty, then he must convince the Judge/Court of this fact, ... )

Did Zahid Hamidi take a position in the 1MDB scandal like what Muhyiddin Yasin did? No, he did not - in fact, he still believes that Najib did not commit any crime...

So, if Fadhlina, considers Zahid a 'teacher' and a 'role model' - in my opinion, it is indicative of her character, morals, values and principles > and I certainly will not want her to be EDUCATION MINISTER.

Anwar should consider a new EDUCATION MINISTER...

And, in fact, he really should remove Zahid Hamidi from Cabinet - it is interesting to note that this DPM Zahid may be behaving like the 'Prime Minister' of Malaysia looking at number of media reports about Zahid (he may be the first DPM who speaks so much, and appears in the press so often).  

See also:-

Was PM's comments about Zahid Hamidi's case inappropriate? A personal opinion OK - but as PM?

If DPP Raja Rozela Raja Toran continues to prosecute, Zahid Hamidi will likely be convicted and sentenced? Come back and prosecute to the end..

When AG who discontinued Zahid's case gets appointed Chairman of a GLC - A question of public perception?

What happened to Zahid's DNAA Parliamentary Committee? Separation of AG from Public Prosecutor important but the DNAA?

Zahid Hamidi's can always be charged again, the trial reinstated and continued - section 254A CPC? Explaining and concerns?

29 Bribery Charges - mid-trial discontinuance and acquittal - Time to Abolish ACQUITAL safe for after trial/close of prosecution case?

Zahid Hamidi should not have met 'alleged donors'- 'interference with on-going investigation'? 

 

When Anwar's angry at me, Zahid comes to my defence - Fadhlina
Published:  May 16, 2024 10:01 PM
Updated: May 17, 2024 9:35 AM

Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek showered praise on Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, calling him one of her “teachers”.

During a speech at a Teacher’s Day event, she shared how the Umno president has a more nurturing relationship with her compared to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.

“Every time the prime minister gets angry at me, it is Zahid who will defend me.

“So I have two role models, one who is angry because he wants me to keep working hard and one who defends me because he wants me to keep being better.

ADS

“So I have two teachers who are very important in the Madani leadership today,” she said.

Fadhlina is the chief of PKR’s women’s wing, the same party established and headed by Anwar.

Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi

The event celebrating the 53rd National Teacher’s Day was held at the Zenith Hotel in Kuantan, Pahang.

Fadhlina also thanked Zahid for his efforts in technical and vocational education and training (TVET) programmes.

ADS

He provided support and an ecosystem for national TVET education, she said.

“The establishment of the national TVET council and the national TVET policies would not succeed without the trust of the national leadership and also without his (Zahid’s) commitment, who is willing to go on the ground in several countries to see developments for himself and bring home (methods) to be used by us together,” she said.

TVET programmes are a focus of the country’s education direction, she said.

She said efforts are being taken so that youth and their parents do not see TVET as a second choice but as their main one.

Improving use of technology by teachers

During the event, she also announced initiatives for teachers to enhance their capacity in digital technology.

According to a Bernama report, she said her ministry will collaborate with Apple Professional Learning Specialist Malaysia to train 100,000 “Apple Teachers”.

“Also, in the context of recognising teachers who excel in adapting to digital technology, 1,000 teachers will be selected to attend courses to be certified as digital professionals and recognised as the Education Ministry’s Guru Jauhari Digital,” she said.

Further, the existing Cuti-Cuti Cikgu (CCC, or Teacher’s Holiday) programme will see partnerships with Malaysia Airlines, Firefly, Bank Rakyat, Wetland Putrajaya, Air Asia, and Traveloka this year.

Fadhlina also announced two publishing grants worth RM10,000 each, for writing about “Madani Teacher Figure” and “Madani Leadership Figure” topics.

She then revealed the development of a Teacher Well-being Index, aimed at assessing the educator ecosystem. - Malaysiakini, 16/5/2024